Science topic
Convection - Science topic
Transmission of energy or mass by a medium involving movement of the medium itself. The circulatory movement that occurs in a fluid at a nonuniform temperature owing to the variation of its density and the action of gravity. (McGraw-Hill Dictionary of Scientific and Technical Terms, 4th ed; Webster, 10th ed)
Questions related to Convection
The theory of plate tectonics has been foundational in explaining Earth's geological features, attributing the movement of tectonic plates primarily to mantle convection currents. However, emerging research suggests that this model may not fully account for all observed geological phenomena. To advance our understanding, it's imperative to critically assess these limitations and consider potential refinements.
Limitations in the Mantle Convection Model
- Neutral Buoyancy and Mantle Convection: Some studies challenge the feasibility of mantle convection as the driving force for plate movements. Applying the concept of neutral buoyancy, traditionally used in submarine design, it has been argued that the density differences required for mantle convection are insufficient to drive the large-scale motions observed in tectonic plates. arxiv.org
- Initiation of Subduction Zones: The current model does not adequately explain how subduction zones originate. While mantle convection suggests that cold, dense plates sink back into the mantle, initiating this process requires additional forces or conditions not fully accounted for in the existing framework.
- Intraplate Volcanism: Traditional plate tectonics explains volcanism primarily at plate boundaries. However, volcanic activity within plates, such as the Hawaiian Islands, challenges this framework. The mantle plume hypothesis suggests upwellings from deep within the mantle, but this remains debated.
Proposed Updates and Considerations
- Incorporating Alternative Driving Forces: Beyond mantle convection, other mechanisms such as "slab pull," where sinking plates at subduction zones pull the trailing lithosphere, and "ridge push," where gravitational forces at mid-ocean ridges push plates apart, should be integrated into the model to provide a more comprehensive understanding of plate dynamics. reddit.com
- Reevaluating Early Earth's Dynamics: Recognizing that plate tectonics may not have operated in the same manner throughout Earth's history invites exploration into alternative tectonic processes that could have been active during the planet's early development.
- Advancing Technological Tools: Employing high-resolution seismic tomography and geodetic measurements can refine our understanding of Earth's interior and surface dynamics, leading to more accurate models.
By addressing these limitations and integrating new perspectives, we can enhance our comprehension of Earth's complex geological processes. Engaging in interdisciplinary research and embracing innovative methodologies will be pivotal in this endeavor.
I'm trying to model a SLM process on COMSOL and I'm finding some issues on simulating the layer addition. For an initial test, I have the substrate and 2 more layers (the laser travels 3 times). In order to simulate their addition, I created piecewise functions that are 1 when the layer is active and 10e-15 when it's innactive, and I multiplied the physical properties of the material by the function. See images below to make it clearer. The GIF shows a zoom on the layers to better see the laser pass.
However, when I use a point probe to measure the temperature inside the layers, it increases even when the layer in question is not supposed to be active. The plot below show the temperature in 3 points. Laser pass time is 0.36 seconds.
For the boundary conditions, the bottom surface has a fixed temperature (ambient), the sides have convection, the top has radiation to the ambient and also convection (but the convection I could only select the last layer surface, the software doesn't let me select the others). But even if theses conditions are not really correct, I think that the points I presented should have the increase in temperature they are showing when the layer is inactive, as you can see I multiplied the material properties by the function.
Does anyone have an idea of what is wrong?





Hubbert's Fluid Potential: An Ignored Concept in Reservoir Engineering?
In an isotropic reservoir, having a fluid flow,
with a constant-density fluid,
the flowlines will be completely dictated by a potential field
(i.e., the flow lines will parallel the gradient vectors of hydraulic head).
If so, then, can't we define a potential field at all,
in an oil reservoir,
having a variable-density flow
(except along WOC & GOC)?
Do we have a finite 'field of force' -
in an oil reservoir
(oil-water system, with a variable density case),
where a rotational component
tending to cause a convective movement?
Whether such a rotational component
is supposed to be regarded
as superimposed on the potential field itself?
Suresh Kumar Govindarajan
I want to simulate TIG welding in ansys using 2 moving heat source to cover circumference and element birth and death method and using convection and radiation as thermal boundary conditions.
I am getting error each time
Please Help Me.
I want to create a model where a laser beam is used to heat up a thin layer (5nm) of gold. It would be required to consider interactions of the laser with both fluid and solid materials as the solid object with the gold layer is submerged in a small micro well. Please refer to the attached document to get an idea about the model.
At this point I beleive using "Radiative Beam in Absorbing Media" in COMSOL 6.2 is a good optiom. Any suggestions would be appreciated.
"When solar irradiation reaches a surface, some of it is absorbed while the rest is reflected. Part of the light absorbed by the surface transforms into heat and increases the module's temperature. Some of the thermal energy from the PV panel is lost to the environment through convection and thermal radiation. Therefore, for thermal losses, I have two equations: Q(radiation) and Q(convection). To introduce them as boundary conditions in Fluent, I used a Mixed approach to incorporate radiation and convection. However, I'm unsure how to apply the optical loss of the surface due to reflection of the panel towards the environment, derived as: Q_reflectance = G_sun * (1-α), as a boundary condition in Fluent applied to a wall.
I need some articles on convective boundary please?
In Abaqus heat transfer analysis, when assigning furnace temperature to a column (H-Section), how we identify exposed and unexposed surfaces? As in a furnace, all surfaces are exposed. On which surfaces should radiation and convection interactions be assigned? As, for beams, typically, the top surface of the flange is considered unexposed while the remaining surfaces are considered exposed. What should be the approach for columns?
I need to explain the local temperature differnce and boussinsq hypothesis validity?
I have other question in setup of mixed convection of water flow in circular tube under an isothermal heat flux using Ansys fluent,gravity is on, In term of density the boussinesq hypothesis is done, also reference density set at reference temperature (inlet temperature), is it necessary to go to operating conditions to more setup?
To know the impact of secondary flow in mixed convection of water in circular pipe under an isothermal heat flux the heat transfer and fluid flow characteristics, the boussinesq hypothesis is done. What is the range of temperature in each cross section of the pipe when the boussinesq hypothesis is valid?
When Prandtl number is increased for two cases tested over same Rayleigh number, the peak vertical-velocity decreases as Prandtl is increased. This is questionable to the fact that in general terms when Prandtl in increased the velocity boundary layer thickness increases due to increase in momentum diffusivity (\nu)
I'm actually uncertain about the fact that I should treat velocity Boundary layer thickness and peak velocity obtained as two different things.
Also, the current observation is done from the Numerically solved Rayleigh Benard Convection problem in OpenFOAM, with Pr and \nu (kinematic viscosity) as input parameters. For both cases (high and low Pr), \nu value is kept constant and indirectly the input is \kappa (thermal diffusivity) when Pr is changed. (can be a factor to get such behavior for velocity peaks)

Earth emits longwave radiation to space most efficiently from the higher atmosphere layers and regions closer to the poles. As a result, there is an increased need for energy transport to the upper layers of the atmosphere and poleward energy transport. If the former holds true I wonder the potential consequences or changes in the Earth's energy dynamics that have to happen. Here are some examples:
1: increasing convection in the tropics - aka more and extreme positive Indian Ocean dipoles and more and extremer EL Niños?
2: increasing poleward moisture transport?
3: increasing poleward warm water transport? E.g. intensifying gyre circulations?
4: extreme convection events injecting water vapor into the stratosphere moving poleward?
5: increasing cold air outbreaks out of the polar air cell during winter, so warm air can move north?
6: Would this increase longwave radiation to space as convective activity increases in the Arctic during winter?
Suppose, we need to solve 1D heat conduction equation numerically to simulate the heat transfer for a steel rod where convection occurs at its surface. Now, how to solve the 1D heat conduction equation considering the convection scenario also as boundary conditions? any suggestion or resources?

Dear Genius Researchers,
I would like your guidance if anyone can help me in model (Numerically) pool boiling heat transfer phenomena. I am working on Mathematical modeling of "Quenching process", and stuck in lot of theories, still unable to find way to model the "convective heat transfer coefficient" during pool boiling in quenching a steel specimen.To make it simple can we use one dimensional FE method in doing so...? Please share your expert opinion and guidance.
Thanks
Recently, I have worked on a subject that I need to analyze the vortex.
Is there any good reference (book, lecture, or paper) that illustrates clearly vortex generation, type of them, convection, and shedding?
Dear amazing members,
I have a doubt.
If I have three adjacent planes with different boundary conditions, in a 3D domain, Dirichlet (fixed temperature) on one plane, Neumann fixed flux on another plane and Neumann heat conduction on another, then what should I do?
Should I consider all the conditions on the common node? I read somewhere that if Temperature and heat flux is specified on a node then only specified temperature should be considered, but I don't know if I should ignore convective heat transfer when temperature is specified.
And in 2D case, when only temperature is specified on one edge, and convective heat transfer on adjacent edge? Then should I consider the heat convection at the common node these two edges?
Thank you 😊
How can I find value of convective heat transfer coefficient (h) of free air at -20 degree Celsius? Is there any h vs T graph? Or data table?
Description: The air is under natural free convection and the pressure is 1 bar to 0.1 bar.
Hi
For the validation purpose, I need some published data for upward flow between parallel plates in mixed convection
Do the convective boundary conditions belongs to the Neumann type?
In Ansys Fluid Flow (Fluent), I performed a thermal simulation on a heat sink, How can I find the thermal coefficient (h) for convection or heat flux for convection values from that simulation?
As we know, in many references (Farmer et al., 1975; Schmidt et al., 2018; Austin, 2019), the harmonic analysis on the individual thermistor temperature records was applied, especially for the high-frequency water temperature data. I think this method is helpful for water temperature analysis, but I still do not fully understand the physical significance of this method. Can anyone make a clear explanation for this?
After a harmonic analysis, we can obtain a signal. It is easy to understand that the magnitude of the signal decreases with water depth. But some researchers assume that it can be fitted with an offset exponential equation (Austin, 2019). In this way, I can not understand. Hope some warm-hearted can help to explain it.
Thanks very much!
Reference:
[1] Farmer D M. Penetrative convection in the absence of mean shear[J]. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 1975, 101(430): 869-891.
[2] Austin J A. Observations of radiatively driven convection in a deep lake[J]. Limnology and Oceanography, 2019, 64(5): 2152-2160.
[3] Schmidt S R, Gerten D, Hintze T, et al. Temporal and spatial scales of water temperature variability as an indicator for mixing in a polymictic lake[J]. Inland Waters, 2018, 8(1): 82-95.
How to prevent convection for top surface of cell while having only conduction with tabs ?
Can i use simply convective boundary condition with 0 heat transfer coefficient value for whole top surface ?
The water temperature in summer is over 30 degrees. This is favorable for the formation of a tropical cyclone. From autumn to spring, the water temperature is higher than the air temperature. This is favorable for the formation of a tropical cyclone. The type of atmospheric circulation is anticyclonic. This is favorable for the formation of a tropical cyclone. The width of the Red Sea is more than 300 km and it is more than the diameter of the convective cell that transforms into a vortex. The salinity of the water in the Red Sea and in the Persian Gulf is much higher than usual. Maybe this is the problem? It is known that salt water evaporates worse than fresh water.
I am trying to develop a UELMAT for a steady heat transfer analysis. My problem is that my element doesn't work when convection interaction is applied to it. I have tried both to apply this concentrated interaction in the nodes (since superficially it does not work in user-defined elements) and trying to add the FILM subroutine inside the UELMAT subroutine. In all it returns me the nodal temperature as 0 in all the nodes.
Tropical cyclogenesis is a sequence of random events that transform convection into a vortex. Many people think so. But there are facts of correlation of tropical cyclogenesis activity in different regions of the planet. There are data on the cyclical strengthening and weakening of the global tropical cyclogenesis. But then it is a natural, not a random process. For more details, see the dissertation of my graduate student Vadim Doli. See also my question "It is believed that tropical cyclones are local eddies that form without a system. I think this is a mistake." There is a discussion on this topic.
I'm now studying the transportiveness of discretisation schemes using An introduction to Computational Fluid Dynamics: The finite Volume Method; HK Versteeg & W Malalasekera; 1995. In Page 144 it says "Since there is no diffusion φ_P is equal to φ_W. If the flow is in the negative x-direction we would find that φ_P is equal to φ_E" (The x-direction is W -> P -> E, and there is only convection and no diffusion, so Peclet number = inf. See the appended figure for details.).
This really confuses me, does it mean if the flow is in the x-direction, then φ_P is unequal to φ_E and they are equal only if the flow is in the negative x-direction?? I cannot understand it because if the flow is in the x-direction, E will be downstream of P and will only be influenced by P, so φ_E is equal to φ_P, which follows that φ_W=φ_P=φ_E.
Do I make a mistake? Please help me, thanks a lot!

- Two-dimensional Steady State Conduction in a Slab Irradiated by a High Energy Laser Beam at The Surface: Use the finite difference method to solve a two-dimensional steady state conduction in a rectangular aluminum (k =200 W/m C) slab subjected to a constant surface heat flux irradiated by a high-energy laser beam at the top surface. For simplicity, assume the heat flux distribution to be to be a constant average value IO = 2 X 108 W/m2 acting over a section of the surface equal to the beam diameter, d=4mm as shown in the figure. The remaining portion of the top surface is subjected to convection with hc=100W/㎡ C. All other surfaces are assumed to be maintained at constant temperature of 𝑇∞=25 C.
Hello everyone, I was wondering about the convection phenomenon in the airgap of a permanent magnet machine. I found in the literature that we need to look for the Taylor number and then Nusselt number based on the flow type (speed) to find the thermal resistance in the airgap. But what about the boundary condition temperatures on the inner stator surface and outer rotor surface? Are they necessary to determine the temperature in the air gap using the LPTM model?
Hello,
I am trying to model a 3D heat transfer problem in COMSOL v6. The geometry is very simple and attached below. The length of model is 2m. Rectangular block is 200mm * 160mm.
The point of interest is to calculate equivalent thermal conductivity of air. Thermal conductivity of air in this region depends on all 3 types of heat transfer. Radiation is from the enclosing material (Insulation material on inner side and steel on the outer side)
Conduction and Radiation can be modelled easily. But including the convective effects is little tricky. Ideally, whole of the system should be simulated with induced velocity. But including a lot of physics is making the computation tediously long.
Does anyone how to model this case? One way is to consider analytical Nusselt number correlations. But I do not know how to couple this correlation as my model is also dependant on radiation.
Thanks in advance.
Dear all
How can be activated the angle of magnetic field (γ) in FLUENT for convection heat transfer, as shown in Figure 1? step by step please.
Hi Everyone,
I am solving a simple heat transfer problem of pipe at a constant temperature. I want to find the heat loss to ambient using radiation and convection but show the following error.
An unknown error occurred during solution. Check the Solver Output on the Solution Information object for possible causes.
Hi ,
I am doing a conduction and convection heat transfer analysis in a layered block. The middle layer emits heat flux which is transfered via conduction and convection to the top surface on both sides. I am getting the following error. Would anyone know what this means ?
***ERROR: STRESS - DISPLACEMENT ELEMENTS OR OTHER ELEMENTS WITHOUT TEMPERATURE
DEGREE OF FREEDOM ARE NOT ALLOWED IN A HEAT TRANSFER ANALYSIS
Many thanks for any help.
In last 20 years, the single phase convection heat transfer studies of transitional and turbulent flow in noncircular ducts with asymmetrical heating are being attempted using numerical methods and CFD mostly without experimental verification of the results; an important shift from earlier experimental approach. I feel this requires thread bare discussion regarding accuracy of the results and other aspects.
do i need to apply temperature , convection and radiation loads all simultaneously or can i apply it by using temperature only?
It is shown that a comparison of the convection heat transfer coefficient of a thin water bearing fracture, αw, with the conduction heat transfer coefficient of the surrounding rock, αr, leads to a drastic αw >> αr difference, called α¬discrepance.It does follow that it is the rock, and not the water, which governs the heat transfer.
Hi, Where can I find the solution manual of the book - An Introduction to Convective Heat Transfer Analysis? I searched on the internet, but couldn't find it. Thanks in advance.