Science topic
Contract Law - Science topic
Explore the latest questions and answers in Contract Law, and find Contract Law experts.
Questions related to Contract Law
Dear All,
I trust this message finds you in good spirits.
This is my first post to the community.
I have written an article that I am planning to submit for publication, however, I have trouble selecting the genre. My submission revolves around assisted suicide and includes elements of both criminal and Human rights Laws; it explores whether an individual assisting in the suicide is a murderer or not and also analyses the human rights considerations that concern the right to life. Most journals that I have researched either ask for the area of law or are specific to an area of law. i.e Criminal Law or Contract Law
I have never submitted an article before so please forgive any mistakes that I may have made in using the correct jargon whilst asking my question.
Kind Regards
Technology poses new challenges for the legal system. This question delves into the legal framework surrounding smart contracts. Some points to consider are contract law principles (e.g., intent, good faith, established rules for interpreting written agreements), code versus natural language, judges may require technology experts to understand the code, jurisdictional differences, adopting specific contract laws, and relying on existing frameworks, adapting to the rapidly evolving technology of smart contracts, dispute resolution mechanisms. Concerns that could arise from potential ambiguities are related to code bugs, unforeseen errors, unclear language, poorly written functions, external dependencies, oracles, and what else?
#research #question #researchquestion #smartcontract #smartcontracts #smartlegalcontracts #laws #regulations #tech #governance #emergingtech #ai #interpretation #ambiguities

Our study consists in noting the progressive apprehension in Iraq and French positive civil law of environmental legislation. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate that there is a functional and interactive relationship between civil law and current environmental concerns. These help to modify Iraqi civil law and force a rethinking of a number of its fundamental principles. When interacting with civil law, environmental concerns will primarily affect contract law. Finally, regarding contract law, environmental concerns affect the general theory by increasing the compulsory content of the contract and the content of named contracts. The environment is also becoming a fully-fledged object of new contracts which have as a direct or secondary purpose the protection of the environment. All the changes thus observed foreshadow a specific legal space, private and public, whose object is the environment and its protection. In view of these concerns, it is possible to wonder how the environment and the contract can really meet, consider each other and more broadly influence each other since, in fact, the environment is part of a long-term perspective. It is developing for current generations but also for future generations. As some authors argue, environmental law is intended to govern a general interest, whereas the contract is the tool par excellence for governing particular interests. But are general interest and particular interests diametrically opposed? Why can't the contract serve the environment? Of course, environmental law has its own instruments, such as impact studies or environmental responsibility, but doesn't this law deserve efficiency from all .
Please refer to the attached PDF document for the full questions and additional information related to the posed question.
Thank you.
Irucka Embry, E.I.T.
This issue involves what court has jurisdiction to hear the case, which involves an English person and an America. The American has been served a claim notice while on a visit to England. The American however, wants to question the Jurisdiction of the high court in London and want to know what European rules apply on allocation of Jurisdiction and their relevance since she is an American.
If anyone is willing to assist, I can give the summary of the case details, so that it case be understandable from your perspective.
What do you think what is the difference between Mandatory Overtime and slavery? and where is the line? Should it be allowed on the legislative basis that in some scenario employers would have a right to have mandatory not paid overtime requests > that employee can not refuse?
Is there a good review on if and how power system operators compensate/reimburse end-customers for black-outs (especially long interruptions with duration of hour or even days)? By contract, law, other regulation?
Comprehensive descriptions of international examples for regulation would also be helpful.
There are exclusions in Article 2(2). I understand that the focus is on contract law and international litigation and arbitration are its primary dispute resolutions.
However, I can make more sense of the New York Convention (1959), because they defer to national laws to make such exclusions.
Respected and dear Researchers, please help me to find court cases of good faith of contract of Islamic countries.... like arbitration where the judge applied during the decision good faith of Islamic contract law..like promissory estoppel, abuse of right, rule of situation changing..
China is making her new Civil Code, though she has already several single laws such as Contract Law, Torts Law and Property Law (Sachenrechts) . The Author is taking part in the draft of Contract of the Code. Should Franchising Contract be regulated as a new normal contract in the Code? DCFR seems to suggest other countries to take this path.
Besides, how about making a new and independent law, Distribution Channels law, including Franchising, Commercial Agency and Commission etc. This Law will be a positive response to Economy and Economics, probably.
I am looking for statistics related to forward contracts results e.g.: the tipical compliance percentages per product has been experienced in the practice when forward contracts are involved, or the bad debts percentage were not ever collected.
This is to determine a risk measure and what could be the real ROI for an investor.
I have seen increased scholarship calling into question the default rule that expectation damages be awarded for a contract default. I am more convinced this is a legitimate question (although it is certainly not the prevailing law I have seen.) A tort seems to be at least as worthy of compensation to the injured as does the innocent party in a contractual contest. Yet, in tort, you are awarded your actual damages. In contract, actual damages would be what we usually call "reliance damages." We award reliance damages when it is difficult to measure expectation damages. Why is it not the other way around? Why not, instead, award reliance damages generally and expectation damages when reliance damages are difficult to determine? Can anyone point me to the most recent literature on this debate? It is a question both old and new, and I'd like to see what is the state of the art is on it. Also, feel free to state your own opinion on the matter. Thanks.
Can I get any previous research papers related to measuring breaches in psychological contracting?
I am writing an article on Chinese sellers on Amazon. One legal question: when a German purchases from a Chinese seller on Amazon.de, is the location and contract law (not T&Cs) Germany or China?
On what legal basis to you base your opinion?
Due to the 'restraint of trade' and 'undue influence' doctrines applied to contracts in the music industry does this give the exploiters of music a disadvantage in their bargaining power?
The doctrine of unconstitutionality is about how the court will decide a contract term being enforceable or not in case one party of the contract has more power than the other. This doctrine is well acknowledged in Common Law. There are many recognition of law relating to one-sided contract in Civil Law. But I am not sure of the official terminologies. Please advise me the theory or any studies relating. Many thanks.
Volumes have been written and there is a lot of resarch to suggest that Construction fails to use ICT, and more suggesting that it is the actual culture of the industry that poses the problem. But is it the Contract Law that now prevails that impedes ICT uptake?
Does anyone know where to find the ordinance for the Portuguese law obliging to provide information of inventories?
I am conducting the comparative analysis of Islamic Law and Law Book of Manu regarding fiscal contracts (Business Contracts). I am in need of detailed commentary of Manu's Law Book, specially that explain the verses regarding Business Contracts.
I would like to have a comparative idea of how is the situación in the different EU Member States. It will be interesting to have different perspectives of how useful can it be the criminalization of cartels in Competición Law.
Generally we know that Legal Due Diligence (LDD) can be performed in a business transaction before signing the contract. But how can it be performed in public projects? Should we use this term of LDD on legislation? Is there any guarantee that it will run well?
What contract clauses and terms do we often see in PBL contracts, but not in traditional contracts, because they deviate from or isn't present in traditional contracts? It would be very appreciated if someone would share their experiences working with PBL or share some of the contractual clauses/terms.
link to policy paper on PBL: http://bbp.dau.mil/docs/ASD-LandMR-PBL-ComprehensiveGuidance-22Nov2013.pdf
I am writing a paper pacing delays, where a contractor chooses to delay work he or she could have otherwise done due to a delay on the part of the owner. I found only a handful of resources, mostly all citing each other. Do you know of papers or resources that would be helpful to expand my literature review?