Computational Social Science - Science topic

Imperfections of the social market economy as unethical business practices do reflect human behavior, i.e. not external to market structures as the market should not be idealized as perfect answer to satisfy human needs.

As the old police officer saying at shift change goes: be careful out there !

A place to start is the paper:

Cioffi-Revilla, C. (2021). The Scope of Computational Social Science. In Handbook of Computational Social Science, Volume 1: Theory, Case Studies and Ethics (Vol. 1, p. 38). https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Claudio-Cioffi/publication/349636618_The_Scope_of_Computational_Social_Science/links/60390f8ca6fdcc37a8557467/The-Scope-of-Computational-Social-Science.pdf

A book by the same author will expand on the concepts:

Cioffi-Revilla, C. (2014). Introduction to Computational Social Science: Principles and Applications. Springer Science & Business Media.

The Aidos-x system is an excellent intelligent system for diagnosing and classifying human diseases. The methods of using the Aidos-x system for diagnosing human diseases are disclosed in lectures with sound "Using automated system-cognitive analysis for the classification of human organ tumors", "Intelligent system for diagnosing early stages of chronic kidney disease", which can be downloaded right now from the website https ://www.patreon.com/user?u=87599532 Creator's title: «Lectures on Electronic Medicine». After subscribing to this site, you will receive databases for medical research to identify the diseases that you will read about in lectures. The acquired skills of working in the Aidos-x system will allow you to apply for grants to carry out scientific research in the field of medicine.

To subscribe to the site https://www.patreon.com/user?u=87599532 you do not need to go to the bank, but you can do it using the Pay Pal system. Send a transfer in your currencies, and the transfer to dollars will be done automatically. After subscribing on the site, you will receive the Aidos-x system with an English user interface for free.

Thank you.

There is even such a discipline called "COmputational Social Sciences"...

Dear

you can follow my items and find what is your interests

yours

Hussein

In my opinion, the current fourth technological revolution is just beginning. Evidence to support this thesis is the ongoing progress in the creation of new advanced technologies Industry 4.0 and their applications in industry, in improving the offering and implementation of services, in improving the organization and functioning of economic entities and financial and public institutions, in improving the management processes of these entities, etc.

Regards,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

The idea is good. Check if there is some already data set available for this problem. And then work on that data. Visualise the data and check if u get any idea from that. It is basically an NLP problem.

Check if this link might help you.

You should be careful. There is a methodological issue (and I know I am in a minority on this) that calibration of an ABM by "fitting" has the potential to undermine the value of the approach. This is because most ABM have lots of parameters and if they were statistical models, we would already know that too many parameters and not enough data = rubbish. The trouble is, unlike for statistics, we don't have a "formal" way of deciding how many parameters we are "allowed" not to know the values of (but fit) relative to the "amount" of data. I suspect that for ABM we will have to rely on some sort of operational procedure (analogous to sensitivity analysis) to understand this issue. But I do not want to overstate the case. Some fitting could sometimes be legitimate depending on the data and the model - but at the moment we are not really sure when or why IMO, we just do it. (But also, ask yourself, is it a bad design principle to specify a model where you cannot see how to collect the data "for real" and only fit? Sometimes the problem is only practical I agree but sometimes it is definitely bad design.) I have tried to develop these arguments more rigorously here: http://methods.sagepub.com/foundations/agent-based-models. I have also shown that calibration/validation without fitting does not have to be an impossible goal: (though I know this article has many weaknesses.)

Yes, you can report experiment 1 and then experiment 2. You can write general methods for both experiments och method 1 and two. The same thing goes for the discussion.

Hello Atef,

Choice of a statistical test depends on:

1. The specific hypothesis you wish to evaluate;

2. The nature of the variables/scores involved; and

3. How the data were collected.

That's pretty terse, but this seemingly simple list covers a lot of different judgments as to how best to analyze the data.

There are various decision trees available that can help you walk through a lot of the usual (e.g., basic, intermediate) statistical test options, but none will be a complete compendium of all tests available (here's an example: https://www.microsiris.com/Statistical%20Decision%20Tree/). As well, talking through your data aims and research project with a local expert may help you to identify an alternative approach that you might not have considered, but might perform better to achieve your research goal/s.

Good luck with your work.

Hello, Furkan. I'm currently finishing my master's in Political Science, and about to start my PhD. That said, I find of the utmost importance that we, Political Science students, start our methodological journey by understanding the role of Political Science as a discipline — otherwise, how are we supposed to make the right research questions?

For that, I recommend the following:

After this, and considering you already have some very basic knowledge of research methodology, you should tackle:

With those readings, I believe you are ready to trace your own path.

And yes, you should definitely start learning R. You can safely ignore SPSS and Stata.

Good luck!

Dear Dr. Gh. Javan-Doloei , Dear all,

I completely agree with you Dear Dr. Gh. Javan-Doloei . A harmonious team is an ultimate pleasure.

Best regards.

The above question inspired me to the following considerations:

Is the progressive increase in the digitization of the education process a feature of the current technological revolution of Industry 4.0?

Is the progressive increase in the digitization of education process instruments a feature of the current technological revolution known as Industry 4.0?Measuring the impact of digital technology, including new online media on the process of learning and the effects of the education process can be based on a comparison of assessments at a specific time, a specific educational process supported by the use of new online media, social media portals and other technologies typical of the digital age. These technologies currently include mainly new technological solutions, streamlining improvements, innovations etc. regarding, among others, advanced data processing, including data obtained from the Internet, data processing in the cloud, Big Data database systems, using artificial intelligence, etc. These new technologies of advanced information processing co-create the current fourth technological revolution called Industry 4.0.In view of the above, the current question is: Is the progressive increase in the digitization of education process instruments a feature of the current technological revolution known as Industry 4.0?

Please, answer, comments.

I invite you to the discussion

Best wishes

Biomedical engineering.

Hope this helps,

Matt

I also like to add that the original conception of smart phones by Nokia is based on Master and Slave arguments from the point of view of technology [communication nodes and receivers] but in reality has a negative social connotation, because the reality is that people became real slaves to the masters of smartphone companies!!

Previously published papers are not considered. Only those papers are considered, which are submitted after the journal is indexed.

http://opus.bath.ac.uk/44849/1/AWilli_Thesis_Final_Version.pdf

Thanks alot for your answer

If you have 98% of all responses fall into a single nominal category (in this case 'yes') then basically any kind of reliability measurement is pretty meaningless.

So I suppose that the reliability statistic is technically correct.

Explanation: Krippendorff's alpha compares 'observed' disagreement with the 'expected' disagreement. The 'observed' disagreement is low in your data, so intuitively we can expect a high reliability. But, since the expected disagreement is strongly influenced by the ratio of values (2-to-98 in your case), the expected disagreement is very, very low in your case, about 4-times lower than the observed one. Combining the two, you will have a low reliability statistics, but as I mentioned, this isn't very indicative in your case.

I highly recommend works and papers by Epstein and Axtell- computational modeling of social phenomenon, macro structures derived as a generative product  of micro motives/states. Features of recursion and contagion emphasized in their models.

Doran's work on social simulation will provide interesting material for the algorithmic treatment of agents' cognitive psychology.

At a spatial level and within an urban ecology, works by Batty. In particular, visualization features of his simulations.

The advice I give my students is to organize the Results section from this kind of comparative work by describing the themes that the groups had in common, and then move on to the ways in which they differed. To the extent that there is meaningful diversity in the important themes, the goal is to account for the sources of those differences.

If the variables are different data types (there are four, nominal, ordinal, interval and ratio) you need to target a data type to convert one or both of them to. Then you can merge

Another way to approach this is to observe if neither of the two variables is ordinal data you could convert both to ordinal and use in a rank test

There are many considerations - it depends on what you wish to test for or analyze?

Dr. Mohamed Benmerikhi,

Sir, Kindly zero size the meaning of "interval sets" in Social sciences disciplines. Honestly say that, Suddenly i cannot understand your points please. 

maybe this helps: http://www.gutenberg.org/wiki/Gutenberg:Information_About_Robot_Access_to_our_Pages

This should help you get the texts and metadata (but no annotations though).

Sahifa, I think that Stata (www.stata.com) is becoming one of the leading packages; it is certainly the major rival to SAS and SPSS, and it is superior in at least some ways. It has a very interesting combination of a commercially developed core with the option of adding user-developed routines. If I were picking a new package now and were willing to pay the price, I'd definitely pick Stata over SAS or SPSS. I use SYSTAT (www.systat.com), which is an excellent value compared to most packages, but does not have the range of features you find in Stata or SAS. A problem with SPSS and some other packages is that they want to sell it to you piece by piece, so if you want a certain feature you may have to add it on as an expensive module. Most packages have limited trial versions available on their websites you can try. SYSTAT also has a free version for students called MYSTAT based on an older release with only minor limitations (limited to 100 variables, and lacking some of the more advanced statistics). In addition to R, there are other free packages out there, such as PSPP (http://www.gnu.org/software/pspp/), which is roughly speaking a free version of SPSS, and MicrOsiris (www.microsiris.com/). Bob

You might be interested in the Open Science Framework: https://openscienceframework.org/

They aim at a large-scale replication of works published in three prominent psychology journals - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Psychological Science, and Journal of Experimental Psychology:

Thanks