Science topic

Cloning - Science topic

Explore the latest questions and answers in Cloning, and find Cloning experts.
Questions related to Cloning
  • asked a question related to Cloning
Question
4 answers
Hi, I have recently started my cloning experments and don't have much experience in doing ligation reactions. I have five insert parts with each having 10ng/ul concentration and i need 200ng of inserts in my final 20ul PCR reactions with 50ng of plasmid. But with this requirement the need of inserts itself will be around 20ul which is not making sense to me.
Therefore, to achieve these reactions, what adjustments do adjustments toadjustmentstoI have to consider for proper calculations, do i need make any adjustment with total volume of reaction or something else. Please guide me with this some explanation if possible as i am a bit confused with this situation.
Thank you in advance.
Relevant answer
Answer
I got confused between the ratio of inserts and vector, which has been resolved now after your clarifications. Thank you so much, Yoav Lubelsky Airat R. Kayumov Usha Kantiwal
  • asked a question related to Cloning
Question
5 answers
Someone who can give advice on this? I wanna use a midigene for a exon-trap assay. I read in several articles (such as: Sangermano et al., 2017 https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.226621.117) that the gateway cloning methode is used for creating a midigene, but wouldn't the gibson methode also be possible and why would you choose one and not the other?
Relevant answer
Answer
Gibson cloning is a method commonly used in molecular biology to assemble DNA fragments seamlessly. It allows researchers to join multiple DNA fragments together without the need for restriction enzymes or ligases. This technique is often employed in the construction of plasmids, expression vectors, and other DNA constructs.
If by "midigene" you mean a DNA construct that includes a specific gene or a portion of a gene, you can potentially use Gibson cloning or other similar methods to create such constructs. However, the success of this process depends on the specific details of your experimental design and the characteristics of the DNA fragments you are working with.
Studying splicing variants typically involves the analysis of different mRNA isoforms produced by alternative splicing of a gene. This can be done using techniques such as reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), quantitative PCR (qPCR), or RNA sequencing (RNA-seq).
If you are interested in creating specific variants for study, you may need to clone the relevant genomic regions, including alternative exons or splicing sites, into appropriate expression vectors. The choice of cloning method will depend on the complexity of your constructs and the specific requirements of your study.
Keep in mind that advancements in molecular biology techniques occur regularly, so it's a good idea to check for the latest literature and protocols related to cloning and studying splicing variants. Additionally, consulting with colleagues or experts in the field can provide valuable insights into the most suitable methods for your specific research goals.
  • asked a question related to Cloning
Question
7 answers
Unwanted base pair insertions/detetions!
This is an age old story with this cloning journey for one particular plasmid ~15kB with a CMV promotor. I get unique base single base pair deletions/insertions that I am pretty sure are happening during bacterial replication, not as a result of a bad ligation, etc.
Details:
-E.Coli DH5a competant cells and heat shock transformation.
-In several stages of cloning, of 6 screened bacterial colonies, all differ by base insertion/deletion, different location in every clone, breaking my reading frame and rendering the construct useless.
Most recently, I screen a clone (12) and confirmed the sequence of my cDNA is 100% correct and there is just 1 moleular species present.
I want more material, so I go to my agar plate with the streaked bacterial colony of clone 12 use this to innoculate my LB + antibiotic. I grow for 2 days at 30' as it the plasmid is large (15 kB) and I worry a bit toxic to the cells.
After miniprepping this culture, sequencing reveals a new base deletion in my protein that didn't exist in the original parent cDNA.
-Any tips? I have tried growing at 37' for 16 hours, 2 days for 30', leaving it a room temp for a day to start and THEN putting in 30', but I'm not sure what else to try and need to produce more of this construct one way or another.
Relevant answer
Answer
For anyone who has stumbled across this post- I just powered through and had success.
I retransformed the confirmed correct DNA and started maxicultures of 4 different bacterial clones. I grow for our standard 2 days at 30'. I just took a small amount of culture and miniprepped it before pelleting the maxi culture and freezing it. I whole plasmid sequenced the miniprepped DNA and happily 2 of the 4 came back without any base indels so I proceeded with maxiprepping the corresponding pellets.
  • asked a question related to Cloning
Question
4 answers
Dear colleaques
I have a problem with cloning of my PCR product (829 bp) into pET101 TOPO vector (5753 bp) by Invitrogen™ Champion™ pET101 Directional TOPO™ Expression Kit. I performed a PCR reaction to obtain my product, which I purified from the gel. The forward primer contains the CACC sequence as recommended. For PCR reaction I use Phusion Plus DNA polymerase whitch generates blunt ends. I got strong band with corect size and purified my DNA by Nucleospin kit. The concentration of my PCR product was 35,2 ng/ul.
For cloning reaction I follow the instructions in manual. It is important to use 0,5:1 to 2:1 molar ratio of PCR product:TOPO vector. So if I used 1 ul of vector (15-20 ng) I dilute my PCR product to concentration 3,52 ng/ul and add 0,82 ul of them into the cloning reaction (molar ratio 1:1) and incubated for 5 min (first time and 20 min second time with the same results). As control I used reaction only with vector (without PCR product). With reactions I transform One Shot TOP10 Chemically Competent E. coli and incubated on the agar plates with ampicilin (100ug/ml) owernight at 37°C. But the results were the same on both plates, where I got hundreds of colonies.
Then I took some 20 colonies and used them as templat in control PCR wth the same primers which I used at the beginning of the process. Reasults were negativ. This was also confirmed by restriction analysis after DNA isolation (miniprep).
Where could be mistake? Thank you very much for any advice.
Relevant answer
Answer
Thank you very much Robert Adolf Brinzer
I mean that this kit with topoisomerasaI needs PCR product with blunt ends, without A-tailing.
Patrik
  • asked a question related to Cloning
Question
3 answers
Hello,
I am transfecting linear DNA along with an Adenovirus transduction to HEK cells and need to isolate the DNA from both the linearised plasmid and viral genome at different passages for restriction digest analysis. I am not interested in the nuclear DNA
Total DNA extraction will include all genomic DNA which I fear will interfere with the restriction digest and produce a highly visible smear on the agarose gel. Ideally, I would want to just isolate cytoplasmic DNA.
Will it be okay to use the total DNA? Could I isolate extrachromosomal DNA using a standard miniprep kit, although they are meant for bacteria? Or would it be better to perform cytosolic isolation followed by DNA analysis?
Relevant answer
Answer
Given the low quantities of linearized DNA that will be present you definitely need some form of enrichment protocol. A miniprep kit might work.
  • asked a question related to Cloning
Question
4 answers
I am doing cloning of a big bacterial insert (3705bp) into a vectors of varying sizes ranging from 3017bp to 3469bp for my bacterial two hybrid experiment. Among other problems with my cloning I have noticed that neither 1% nor 1.2% agarose gel effectively separates my 1kb gene ruler ladder. So, I went for 0.7% agarose gel but I am facing an issue with the time required to run this gel. It runs so slower for me. It took me about 2 hrs (10Volts) to run it so that it crosses the center and reaches close to the bottom part of the gel.
I wonder that less agarose should make the gel run faster but why is it the opposite for me. Can anyone advice or give suggestions on potential factors to investigate or methods to improve migration speed or it is normal to take longer time.
If anyone has expertise in cloning big inserts in the bacterial two hybrid plasmids I would greatly appreciate some tips and suggestions to be successful in cloning.
Thank you in advance for your time and help.
Relevant answer
Answer
10V is too low. Run it at 100V.
  • asked a question related to Cloning
Question
1 answer
How will Matthew Perry Pass on His Genes? Maybe he cannot now because he died. But we may be able to clone him or take his sperm.
Relevant answer
Answer
1) He won't but he doesn't care anymore.
2) He has brothers and sisters and they each share 50% of his genes with him, the same as his children would if he had any. So his genes are still around.
  • asked a question related to Cloning
Question
8 answers
Hello everyone,
I'm currently facing a challenge in my cloning strategy involving the ccdB gene. Despite ordering a gene block with a J13119 and a standard RBS, I've encountered a lack of success after three rounds of cloning using ThermoFisher's ccdB survival strain.
My working hypothesis is that the toxin is being overexpressed, leading to the inability of bacterial cells to metabolize it effectively. To overcome this issue, I'm seeking alternative promoters or sequences that can provide a smaller, more versatile solution than the current chloramphenicol-resistance + ccdb gene from Thermo. Ideally, my sequence should be compatible with both gateway cloning and standard restriction cloning techniques.
Any insights or suggestions regarding suitable promoters or sequences for my specific case would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you for your time,
Juliano
Relevant answer
Answer
Hello everyone, I was finally able to clone using the DB3.1 strain. I think the issue is as mentioned on this thread, the ccdB survival cells cannot handle overexpression of the ccdB gene.
  • asked a question related to Cloning
Question
10 answers
I use restriction enzyme cloning method, and I have been using new reagents e.g., competent cells, and ligase reagent because initially I thought the problem is that these reagents were expired in our lab. Now with these reagents I attempted to clone my shRNA into the vector with 1:3 DNA:insert ratio, but I didn't even see a single colony.
Relevant answer
Answer
I've never tried to anneal oligos without salts. You can easily make appropriate buffer in-house by just searching for "annealing buffer". Good luck!
  • asked a question related to Cloning
Question
5 answers
from where the transcription of the gene in the vector starts , is it always from 5 to 3 or it depends on the direction of the promoter .
Relevant answer
Answer
Ok, are you trying to clone a new gene into pET29a?
  • asked a question related to Cloning
Question
3 answers
Good day everyone, Please how do I select a single clone, from a population of positive cells, I have done puromycin selection and now I want just a single clone from the cell population but I am having difficulties in doing this, please how can this be done. I will appreciate your kind response please. Thanks in anticipation !
Relevant answer
Answer
Thanks for your response, I appreciate.
  • asked a question related to Cloning
Question
3 answers
I extracted DNA from several transformants, but they showed really degraded smear bands. Here're the steps of transformation:
I used Infusion Snap Assembly to ligate a 16kb linearized plasmid fragment, a 100bp fragment, and a 300bp fragment. The linearized backbone undergoes gel extraction and has blunt end. The inserts are overhang-added by PCR, and I also took them from gel extraction.
Then I did bacterial transformation using NEB dh5alpha high efficiency competent cells. Few colonies grew on 50ug/ml spectinomycin plate, 30C in 40hrs. They were picked and inoculated in 5mL LB broth, 50ug/ml spectinomycin, 37C in 22hrs 180rpm shaking. Then I did QIAGEN Miniprep for them.
I used 50ul water for the dilutions, and nanodrop reading shows ~1.8 260/280, and ~2 260/230. However, when I checked the undigested plasmid DNA on the gel, they showed really degraded band. I used the same kit for my 19kB backbone plasmid, and it worked well. When I did digest them, the band looked worse. Also, it's weird that the undigested DNA showed two bands, a large band that degrades a lot, and another small ~500bp linear band.
Therefore, I'm asking for suggestions to improve the result. Could it be the problem of the ligation, transformation, or miniprep? I attached the gel image of the undigested DNA.
Relevant answer
Answer
Some basic clarification about what ligation you’re attempting. Are you trying a three fragment ligation? If so how can your PCR fragments with overhangs lI gate to a blunt ended vector backbone? Based on your lambda DNA size marker transformants 1 & 2 are failures. Trans 2 has DNase contamination; repeat the prep!
  • asked a question related to Cloning
Question
2 answers
I tried and cloned the gene in the 3xFLAG-APEX2-NES vector. i am transfecting 1.5ug of each plasmid in HEK293T cells in 12 well plates at 80% confluency then after 48 hrs of transfection I prepared lysate using RIPA+PIC. on probing with flag antibody only empty vector control is expressed not the fused protein. I have confirmed the clone by sequencing also.
Please help me out with the problem of why fusion protein is not expressed.
thank you
Relevant answer
Answer
If you cloned your gene downstream of APEX2, have you made sure the reading frame is correct so that the correct stop codon is used? You can check this in your sequencing data.
  • asked a question related to Cloning
Question
4 answers
how to add two restriction enzyme sites to primers for cloning a gene sequence (size 1-2kb) to pGEM-T Easy Vector followed by pcambia 1301 and is it necessary to add setting sequence before the restriction sites ?
Relevant answer
Answer
60 for a single primer? good primers have a size of 18 to 23 nucleotides after which there are the bases of your sites which contain 6 or 8 bases.
For GCs it will mainly influence the Tm that you will use to calculate the hybridization temperature for your PCR. If the GC content is large, so will the hybridization temperature.
However, you must try to balance the GC content of the 2 primers so that their Tm (and therefore their hyridation temperatures) are close.
  • asked a question related to Cloning
Question
1 answer
Hi,
1. Does any one know what is the maximum length of amplicons we can amplify using PCR? I need to amplify fragments for assembling a big vector (approximately 100kb).
2. Do you think it's achievable if I amplify 10 genes of approximately 10kB and stitch them together using GIBSON assembly?
Any recommendations/suggestions are appreciated.
Thanks
Relevant answer
Answer
Harculase II claims it can do fragments up to 23kb.
If Gibson assembly does not work you could always use sequential recombineering or SIRA to assemble your final construct.
  • asked a question related to Cloning
Question
3 answers
I have cloned a gene with EcoRI/BamHI restriction sites into p3XFLAG-CMV-14. The sequencing has confirmed that the gene has been inserted in the right direction. For some reason, I would like to reverse the direction of the gene in the same vector backbone. Is there any method to do it?
Thanks in advance!
Relevant answer
Answer
You could PCR your insert and add a different set of restriction sites on the PCR primers so that you can clone it in reverse orientation.
  • asked a question related to Cloning
Question
4 answers
Hello, dear researchers. I am interested in a gene in Pombe. The gene contains 2 introns. I want to overexpress this gene in Pombe. Can I amplify and clone the gene by PCR or do I need to do cDNA translation first? Since the gene already belongs to pombe, will the presence of introns cause any problems?
Relevant answer
Answer
If you're planning to express it in S. pombe, I would keep the introns. S. pombe should be able to express its own genes, and it may also need the introns for optimal expression levels and expression regulation purposes.
  • asked a question related to Cloning
Question
3 answers
Hi all,
I'm attempting to clone a GC rich insert (500bp) into a vector that is approximately 5kb and also GC rich. After sequential digests (one enzyme works at 37 while the other works at 65 degrees Celsius), a 0.5% agarose gel reveals that the vector was efficiently cut as indicated by a 500bp shift down of the parent insert vector. Oddly, the 500 bp insert is barely visible. When blown out, the gel shows a smear near the 500 bp region. Is there a reason this is occurring? We are struggling to get any colonies to appear for diagnostic digests so any help would be appreciated.
Thank you!
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi
I agree with D. Liger. You should use more concentrated gel. If the problem still exists, you can increase the time of the restriction enzyme digest.
  • asked a question related to Cloning
Question
3 answers
I have an insert size of 900 bp, trying to clone it in pET28a vector. But after every the transformation when i am doing colony pcr and digestion check i can only get the fragment of 500 bp. Why is it so? The restriction sites are BamHI and SacI and the gene doesn't have internal sites of these, which i could know by sequencing. So why is it so. Do i need to subclone instead of directly trying to clone in pET28a plasmid?
Relevant answer
Answer
The choice to subclone often has to do with how precious or heterogenous your template samples are. Have you run your restriction digests for cloning on a gel? Are your restriction enzymes still before their expiry date? Sometimes performing an overnight digestion can help. Are you using a CIP treatment step or not?
  • asked a question related to Cloning
Question
7 answers
Hello everybody,
I'm having trouble cloning a 700bp insert into a 18kb plasmid. I'm using Neb Hifi assembly (Gibson assembly) but everytime I have no colonies on the plate. I tried many different insert/plasmid ratio but nothing change. I'm using XL10-Gold bacteria. Both insert and plasmid were purified on agarose gel.
Thank you so much.
Relevant answer
Answer
Sam Carter try electroporation definitely. Heat shock is finicky. Use DH10B strain E. Coli. thermo Fischer sells them
  • asked a question related to Cloning
Question
6 answers
For the Gibson cloning into pH-ePPE vector (19kb), I use NEB Hifi builder mix with 400ng of vector backbone (18kb) and 10ng of 250bp insert and NEB chemically competent 10beta cells for transformation. I know my Gibson assembly is working as I have confirmed by PCR. I have used 1ul to 10 ul of Gibson product as well as 1ul of 1:3 diluted product, but I am not getting a single colony post transformation.
  • The competent cells are functional, verified by transforming the vector pH-ePPE.
  • The vector doesn't have any toxic genes like ccdB and I also confirmed that the gibson mix is not toxic to cells by using positive control.
  • I also used NEB 5 alpha cells, but no no colonies with that also
Can anybody suggest how to troubleshoot this problem.
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi Sanjay T D I'm currently trying to clone a 700bp insert into a 18kb vector and I'm having the same issue as you : no colonies. I'm pretty sure the problem comes from the transformation part and not the gibson assembly. I've read a lot about it and apparently 18kb is really big for bacteria if you're doing a heatshock (like I do). people recommand using electroporation instead (if you can).
If you manage to clone your insert please let me know because I'm really struggling. So far I've tried different ratios 1:1, 1:3, 1:10: 1:20 with vector quantities from 100ng up to 300ng.
Have a nice day.
  • asked a question related to Cloning
Question
4 answers
Hello
Good time everyone
I ran the cloning product on a 1% gel and observed the following band. Can anyone tell me what is the reason why my band has widened?
Relevant answer
Answer
I disagree, the marker looks fine, the image just does not have a high resolution and therefore looks grainy. Yes, there are some smudges on the gel, but this - as we all know - sometimes happens. Just load less PCR product and you will see a sharper band.
  • asked a question related to Cloning
Question
3 answers
I have a insert of 400 bp cloned in vector pbluescript II KS (+) of size 3.0kb at RE sites XbaI and XhoI. But when I try to double digest the plasmid it is not happening. I am sharing picture of result showing the same. Please can anyone provide me the reason and solution for this.
Fig: Lane1: 100 bp plus ladder; lane 2: plasmid double digested; lane 3: plasmid single digested; lane 4: uncut plasmid
Relevant answer
Answer
I am assuming when you say "it is not happening" means you are unable to see the 400bp insert in the gel? You do not say how much plasmid you digested but more than likely there is not enough insert in the gel to visualize.
Your 400bp insert is ~12% of the overall 3400bp size of the plasmid so if you digested only 100ng of plasmid, you would only have ~12ng of insert to see in the gel which is on the low end of what is possible to see in an agarose gel. If you double digest 500ng of the plasmid you should be able to easily see the insert (~60ng).
  • asked a question related to Cloning
Question
1 answer
I was working on a gene construct synthesized in pet29 vector as a clone. Primers were prepared and optimized with gene at Tm 58 degrees. Once primers were optimized, I carried out transformation in expression vector and checked colony PCR with the same set of primers. After some time, I needed to conduct PCR for the same gene again for TA cloning and repeated BL21 transformation but issues occured. My primers that were previously optimized didn't work on the same gene on the mentioned Tm. After numerous trouble-shootings, I decided to check either the problem has appeared in my gene construct or not. I checked my commercially synthesized cloned gene on agarose gel in the intact and digested form and there was no band of gene once visualized. Is there any chance that my clone is destroyed by nucleases? What can be the reason for such conditions? It will be a great help if you can guide me
Relevant answer
Answer
DNA generally does not degrade so easily. You might be aware that people even isolate DNA from fossils. But if it is not working and you want to amplify the gene of your interest you can do that using the colonies you used previously for confirmation of cloning by colony PCR. I hope you had streaked those colonies.
You checked the commercially available clone on agarose gel and you did not get any band there. Did you use a marker there? Did you use any other DNA as positive control? Was that visible on the gel?
  • asked a question related to Cloning
Question
4 answers
I was working on a gene construct synthesized in pet29 vector as a clone. Primers were prepared and optimized with gene at Tm 58 degrees. Once primers were optimized, I carried out transformation in expression vector and checked colony PCR with the same set of primers. After some time, I needed to conduct PCR for the same gene again for TA cloning and repeated BL21 transformation but issues occured. My primers that were previously optimized didn't work on the same gene on the mentioned Tm. After numerous trouble-shootings, I decided to check either the problem has appeared in my gene construct or not. I checked my commercially synthesized cloned gene on agarose gel in the intact and digested form and there was no band of gene once visualized. Is there any chance that my clone is destroyed by nucleases? What can be the reason for such conditions? It will be a great help if you can guide me
Relevant answer
Answer
Ok so you digested the commercial vector with the gene in it. And ran it on a gel.
did you get a band showing the digestion worked? The undigested form is circular and will have multiple bands due to coiling. The digested form should have 2 bands, both different from the undigested, one showing the backbone and one showing the gene you cut out with the endonucleases. Or if you only used one enzyme, you will have one band in the digested lane.
If you used two nucleases and thus expect two bands after digestion, and got none, something went wrong with your loading of the gel or your digestion because there is no DNA. If you used two nucleases and got one band - and it is the expected size of the backbone minus the gene, but you have no gene band - this is unusual. It might mean that there was no insert in the backbone. So what you cut out with the nucleases is a very small segment of the multiple cloning site of an empty plasmid, and that segment has run all the way off the gel. OR it means that your plasmid was a mixture of empty backbone and the desired plasmid, the plasmid with the gene in it - and the proportion was something like 95% empty plasmid, 5% plasmid with gene, so the band for the gene is much more faint than the band for the backbone, and to see it you should use a GBOX and turn up the exposure.
Ok - when you first used this plasmid, you got it from a company, and do you just PCR the plasmid straight from the commercial tube to check the gene was there and then transfect cells and do colony PCR on those? and then just assume the plasmid was pure? or did you then do mini prep with a positive colony, and sequence the resultant plasmid, to make sure you have a pure stock?
Because if you did not do the mini prep and have just been using the original plasmid shipped to you, it might be a mixture of empty backbone and desired plasmid.
im guessing you repeated the transformation the second time and did colony PCR and got nothing - might just be a bad transformation?
Did you then PCR the plasmid?
if you didn’t, do that. If you have a band, your transformation was bad.
if you did, which I assume you probably did, and got no band for your plasmid stock from the company, then what might’ve happened is
the plasmid you got was a mixture of empty backbone and plasmid with gene. When you did the first transformation, you got lucky and got a bunch of the plasmid with the gene in the portion of the stock you aliquoted for that.
now your stock has gone from 95% empty and 5% gene to 99% empty and 1% gene. So your chances of a good transformation are lower
Do your primers bind the backbone around the insert or do they bind the gene? If they bind the backbone, and you did this PCR on the plasmid stock and got no band, the empty vector is outcompeting the one with the gene. try turning up the exposure on the GBOX, you might have a faint gene band. Or it’s outcompeting it so much there is no band. You need primers that amplify only the gene to confirm some plasmids have it.
if the primers bind within the gene and you’re getting nothing, your plasmid stock is a bunch of empty vector.
I recommend, if it turns out the stock is a mixture, you do a transformation and do mini prep to get a pure stock.
It will be ok. Best of luck. Cloning can be confusing. You’re going to figure it out and then you’ll be able to help the next person who has this problem.
  • asked a question related to Cloning
Question
1 answer
Is there any online tool available to check, if designed primers are suitable to get overexpression of the histidine-tagged protein, cloned in pET28a vector?
How to confirm the suitability of primers for the same.
Relevant answer
Answer
There are a few rules to design primers for gene cloning. If you follow them, there will be no issue. The rules can be easily get from PubMed. For in silico gene cloning, you can use the software SnapGene and ApE plasmid editor.
  • asked a question related to Cloning
Question
1 answer
I would like to find out the amino acid sequence for a few CD3 antibodies. Does anyone also know any platform/database that I can find amino acid sequence of antibodies?
Relevant answer
Answer
Have a look at this database:
Maybe you can find those clones.
  • asked a question related to Cloning
Question
3 answers
  • I have been preparing competent dh5alpha cells in the lab with good competency not excellent. however, have not been able to transform my CRISPR plasmid yet. I am following all the desired steps still unable to attain the correct colonies. plz, throw some light where I can be making mistakes. Plasmid is from addgene (pSpCas9(BB)-2A-Puro (PX459) V2.0)
Relevant answer
Answer
If your CRISPR vector is lentiviral based, I think it is better to use other strains of component cells instead of DH5a. It is easier to acquire undesired plasmids in this scenario.
  • asked a question related to Cloning
Question
5 answers
Need to add a gfp tag as well.
Relevant answer
Answer
Get help from the AddGene site to choose the right vector
  • asked a question related to Cloning
Question
5 answers
I am trying to use double selection marker, G418/kanR and BleoR in pPICZalpha plasmid. I am constructing the plasmid with both antibiotic resistance gene and clone it into E. coli Top10. However, I cannot get any colonies in LB low salt KanR BleoR plate. I only know that LB low salt plate is required for BleoR in E. coli. Is there anything else wrong? Any suggestion is welcome and THanks!
Relevant answer
Answer
In continuation of Dr. Michael J. Benedik's suggestion, based on a similar experience I had, I recommend that if you do not have a clone, increase the incubation time (for example, instead of 18 hours t, 24 hours).
some times for some cases, it works.
  • asked a question related to Cloning
Question
1 answer
I recently ordered a cloning product from Thermo Fischer, and the instructions for primer design require that the forward primer have the Kozak sequence ([G/A]NNATGG) on the 5' end. However, I have never designed primers requiring this sequence. How do I design the primer? I made two examples below, but I am not sure which one is correct:
1. GagatctgtcaagagaatccATGG
2. AAATGagatctgtcaagagaatcc
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi Kristen Navarro , if the instruction os specifically to have Kozak at the 5' end I think they are both ot correct. [G/A]NNATGG) means:
position 1 is a purine, either a G or an A; position 2 and 3 can be and nucleotide; and positions 4-7 are ATGG (where ATG is the start of the protein). The sequence makes translation more efficient in some context, so
5'-GAAATGGNNNNNNNNNNNNN-3'
  • asked a question related to Cloning
Question
2 answers
My aim is to identify and amplify the variable regions of mouse Ig and to further clone the sequences in a suitable expression system.
Relevant answer
Answer
Wolfgang Schechinger There are. But, I wanted to interact with someone who has done it in real time. Published articles sometimes have too much information, yet not the minute details.
  • asked a question related to Cloning
Question
4 answers
We are interested in transfecting a CHO cell line to produce a recombinant protein.
We are planning to use the limiting dilution method in 96-well plates to select single-cell clones to be screened for expression and we are looking for a detailed protocol for this cell line. Specifically, we would also be interest to know the cloning efficiency with this cell line (i.e. the expected ratio between wells plated and clones obtained).
 
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi!
Did anyone use any kind of FBS alternative to better the chances of survival of the ExpiCHO cells?
Please let me know.
  • asked a question related to Cloning
Question
2 answers
I want to know about the impacts of cloning process
Relevant answer
Answer
When you are talking about biodiversity on cloning, you are speaking about identical individuals, in this way of thinking, any disease that can affect one of those will exterminate the others by the time goes on... i think the effect on the local biodiversity can be overlayed by the years. (But i took it all from my butt.)
  • asked a question related to Cloning
Question
1 answer
It is possible to transfer genes from plants to humans. This is done through a process called genetic engineering. Genetic engineering is a powerful technology that can be used to improve human health, but it is important to use it carefully. There are potential risks associated with genetic engineering, such as the possibility of unintended consequences.
Relevant answer
Answer
It is difficult to clone plant characteristics to human dna as they vary in both homologous chromosome sequencing, self fertilization and absence of chloroplast. Hence it requires more genetic engineering techniques to achieve this.
  • asked a question related to Cloning
Question
2 answers
How the gene cloning work and mention few steps?
Relevant answer
Answer
DNA cloning is a molecular biology technique that makes many identical copies of a piece of DNA, such as a gene. In a typical cloning experiment, a target gene is inserted into a circular piece of DNA called a plasmid Hint: The insertion of a gene into the plasmid is known as gene cloning, which takes place to insert a specific gene into the plasmid vector for its transformation.
  • asked a question related to Cloning
Question
3 answers
My IPSC clones (not estbished lines) are fargile that when i transfect them with Cas9 palsmids - the cells die. I have used lipofectamine, and electroporation method for transfection. But cells dont survive.
what should i do different?
Relevant answer
Answer
DNA transfections can be toxic, to a degree that really depends on cell type. Have you tried different concentrations / ratios of DNA?
Otherwise to can try electroporation with Cas9/sgRNA RNPs. In other words transfect Cas9 protein complexed with the sgRNA into the cells. I haven't done this with iPSCs but I have found that it permits knockouts in cells that really don't do well with DNA transfections
  • asked a question related to Cloning
Question
4 answers
I want to digest pET28a plasmid (5369 bp) with 2 restriction enzymes (RE)- EcoRI and XhoI for cloning. I checked the REs have single cutting site of each in the plasmid. However when I digest it with EcoRI for 2 hours, it gives 2 bands- 5369 bp (desired) and ~5000 bp (lane 1).
If the construct has an insert that created another EcoRI site then it is now ~10kb plasmid. Interestingly, XhoI digests the plasmid completely (loaded full reaction volume) and gives one sharp band of desired size (5369 bp) not 10kbp (lane 2).
And again in case of double digestion, the undesired band appears again (lane 3).
If it is supercoiled plasmid, then why does it appear in case of EcoRI only? I changed EcoRI brands, incubation time, buffers..but same result.
pET28a: 14ug
EcoRI (invitrogen): 20U
XhoI (NEB):20U
10x Cutsmart buffer (NEB): 2 ul
Rest volume: NF Water
Relevant answer
Answer
I am just guessing here but I wonder if you are seeing some EcoRI* activity where the enzyme is cutting at a second site that is not really a recognition site but is partially recognized. Since digestion at the second site is very inefficient you get some plasmid cut one time and a fraction cut twice.
EcoRI* activity is sometimes triggered if there is too much glycerol and too much enzyme. For example if you are adding 1ul of enzyme to a 20ul reaction then you may be at the glycerol limit. And with the double digest you have even more glycerol.
Try using less enzyme and see if the problem goes away, you should only need 1-2 units so add just a fraction of the enzyme (or increase the reaction volume).
  • asked a question related to Cloning
Question
3 answers
Hi all, is it normal after conduct an E.coli transformation, there were colonies that having low producing protein target and the other having higher producing? What factor(s) that affect this result? Thank you.
Relevant answer
Answer
I have seen this often but don't have an explanation. We would usually screen a dozen or so independent transformants for expression levels and work with the one or two best ones.
  • asked a question related to Cloning
Question
5 answers
I purchased the human clone of this gene and sub cloned it into a Xenopus oocyte plasmid (it contains Xenopus oocyte beta globin to enhance the expression in Xenopus oocyte) with a polyA site. But no functional activity of this protein was detected (I repeated the experiment 3 times). I sequenced the clone and it is correct.
From the literature, I know that its rodent and fish homologues, and some of its family members in human were successfully expressed in Xenopus oocyte with detectable activities without expressing their known co-factor(s). I found an unpublished dissertation work online saying that they couldn't detect function of this human clone in Xenopus oocyte either using a different functional assay.
I ordered antibody of this protein hoping to see whether it didn't express or its function was inhibited for some reason. While waiting for the antibody (it will take weeks), is there anything that I can do to help figure out the reason why I didn't detect its function?
Relevant answer
Answer
Hm. What about cryptic splice sites? Not sure how to detect that, maybe trying to rescue the sequence by PCR and sequence the shorter bands, if any.
Or some unexpected signal sequences.
But all that is just wild guessing.
  • asked a question related to Cloning
Question
4 answers
Hi, I try to clone a V5-TurboID (1Kb) into a roughly 6kb big backbone (pEGFPC2). The restriction enzymes used are NheI and XhoI. Both fragments are gel purified and ligated with T4 Ligase (1h or 16°C overnight), then transformed to Dh5alpha. I can not get any colonies. Ligation ratios varied from 1:3 up to 1:10. Does anyone have any ideas how to solve the problem?
Relevant answer
Answer
Agree with all comments (Sofiane, Matthew, Michael) about the controls for vector antibiotic, competent cells/trafo efficiency (those can all be tested with transforming a low amount of your cloning vector), Ligase / Ligase buffer (ATP, DTT), keeping buffer as alicuots, sometimes adding atp helps.) Another thing: put everything on gel after purification to see if it is really ok and the concentration is right. Sometimes the reads from Nanodrop/etc are not very accurate for purified fragments especially if the concentration is low. Are you using the enzymes together in double digest? Can u see that both sites are cut? could check with individual enzymes to be sure. Good luck.
  • asked a question related to Cloning
Question
6 answers
I have to clone a cDNA to insert in pcdna3.1. The forward primer generated is having tm 83 and reverse primer has tm 67. I am not getting amplification from normal pcr, gradient pcr, hotstart pcr and also touchdown pcr. What should I do? Is it possible to amplify cdna with primer having this much temperature difference?
Relevant answer
Answer
What proportion of your primers are overlapping with your template? You should exclude overhangs from the predicted Tm. Use the lower temp primer for your annealing temp range. Try using a high GC content melting step. Adjust the Mg concentrations. Also have you checked your primers for slef annealing and secondary structure?
  • asked a question related to Cloning
Question
5 answers
We cloned a viral gene into pET28a expression vector and expressed in E. coli. Then, expressed protein was examined by WB and other methods. However, unexpectedly, molecular weight (MW~35KD) of the expressed protein was found to be higher than its predicted (expected~30KD) MW. How could I explain it and what are the major reasons behind it?
Relevant answer
Answer
Hello
It is because of existing the His-tags and other residues of the vector that expressed are with your protein.
  • asked a question related to Cloning
Question
4 answers
Hello,
I previously transfected (by using lipofectamine) rat hepatoma cells with my target gene and used 10%DMEM+PS+500 μg /ml G418 to obtain clones that were expressing my target gene. After a while my negative control cells were dead as expected because they were not transfected and I observed clones in flasks, also as expected. However, I recently started working with HepG2 cells and this method would not work. I checked for transfection using GFP as a positive control under the fluorescent microscope but non-transfected cells (my negative control) would not die, they were just growing fine in G418. I even tried to increase the amount of G418 but this time my transfected cells started to die too. What could be the reason for the non-transfected cells to keep proliferating in G418?
Thank you!
Relevant answer
Answer
Hello Mervre,
each cell line has a different sensitivity to selection factors such as G418. Before you start the transfection and selection you should determine the concentration of G418 that kills untransfected cells. We used Puromycin and fouf that HepG2 needed double the amount as Hek293 and colon cancer cells needed even more.
Hope that helps,
Franziska
  • asked a question related to Cloning
Question
2 answers
Hello scientific community!
I have been trying to establish an IF staining for CD36 in MECs (cardiac, pulmonary and renal glomerular) using CD36:APC (clone REA670; Miltenyi biotec) and CD36:PE (clone CB38; BD Biosciences). But no success so far, even in blood smear stainings.
I have tried different concentrations of each Ab with incubation 4°C ON and 37°C at RT.
Does anyone has experience with CD36 staining? I mostly find successful FACS protocols in publications, but not cell staining.
Thank you!
Relevant answer
Answer
Thanks a lot for your answer, Mark! Yes, I use trypsin to detach the MECs and seed them in fibronectin-coated chamber slides. But then I directly fix them without detaching. So the adhesion molecules should be stable.
  • asked a question related to Cloning
Question
5 answers
I used KAPA hifi pcr kit to linearize the plasmid for in-fusion cloning.
Following the protocol, the DNA template amount was 5 ng and I already diluted it 100x. Annealing temperature: 66 69.
The primer was designed on TAKARA website.
Gel electrophoresis method: 120V 60min
Relevant answer
Answer
5ng of a very small template is a huge number of molecules, i think that there is too much template and possibly too many pcr cycles, Every 10 cycles is 1000 times more pcr product, Aim for about 30,000 molecules as a starting template and set up 4 tubes of pcr and remove one tube at 20, 25 30 and 35 cycles to get an estimate of where you get strong,clean amplification, Your gel looks like great over amplification where there is so much product that you are getting product annealing with other product molecules and creating longer concatamers
  • asked a question related to Cloning
Question
1 answer
To induce Notch signalling in Huh 7 cells, I plan on cloning the NICD and then using it to activate the Notch Pathway. I need the region in the DNA that specifically codes for the Notch 1 intracellular DNA.
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi Umang
We got the Notch1 intracellular domain (NICD) as a gift from another university.
However, You can find the sequence below link-
Hope, this will help you. You can buy it from Addgene ($85).
Best wishes,
Subbroto
  • asked a question related to Cloning
Question
2 answers
BAC vectors are use for cloning purpose and are good for cloning large fragments though they have low copy numbers.
Relevant answer
Answer
If you have designed primers for site-directed mutagenesis to delete a specific restriction site (in this case, the Kpn-I site) in a BAC (Bacterial Artificial Chromosome) plasmid and you are not observing any colonies after transformation, there could be several reasons for this outcome. Here are some potential explanations:
  1. Primer design issues: It's possible that there may be issues with the primer design. Ensure that the primers are designed correctly, targeting the desired site for deletion without introducing any unintended mutations. Verify the primer sequences, including their length, Tm (melting temperature), and absence of secondary structures or hairpins that could hinder primer binding.
  2. Transformation efficiency: The absence of colonies could be due to low transformation efficiency. Check the competency of your DH5α cells to ensure they are competent for successful transformation. Consider using freshly prepared competent cells or optimizing the transformation protocol to improve efficiency.
  3. Toxicity of the modified BAC: The deletion of the Kpn-I site may have unintended consequences, such as affecting the stability or functionality of the BAC plasmid. The modification could render the BAC plasmid toxic to the host cells, resulting in cell death and no colony formation. Consider verifying the compatibility and viability of the modified BAC with the host strain.
  4. Antibiotic selection: Confirm that the appropriate antibiotic resistance marker is present in the BAC plasmid and that the antibiotic concentration used for selection is appropriate. Ensure that the antibiotic resistance gene is functional and active in the host strain.
  5. Screening conditions: If you are using selective media or agar plates for screening colonies, double-check that the medium composition and conditions (e.g., antibiotic concentration, incubation temperature, and duration) are suitable for the growth and selection of transformed cells.
  6. DNA quality and quantity: Assess the quality and quantity of the BAC plasmid DNA used for transformation. Ensure that the DNA is free from contaminants or degradation that could interfere with the transformation process.
It is recommended to carefully review your experimental protocol, primer design, and troubleshooting steps. Additionally, consulting with experienced colleagues or seeking guidance from experts in BAC cloning and mutagenesis could be valuable in identifying the specific issue and optimizing your experimental approach.
  • asked a question related to Cloning
Question
2 answers
when I am expressing my cloned gene, i am getting the desired band in clone induced but the vector induced is also having a band on the same position but faint.
Relevant answer
Answer
If the vector without insert is showing the same band then either your vector-only culture is contaminated, or more likely, the band you are looking at is just a background host protein band and not the product of your clone.
  • asked a question related to Cloning
Question
7 answers
I am trying to clone 2461 bp fragment (restriction enzyme sites are included) into pET28a+ plasmid (which has his-tag that i will be using for purification of protein of interest later). So far, amplification of gene and digestion were completed. Then for ligation step, different V:I ratios were tried and these are 1:1 1:2 1:3 1:5 1:7. Not a single colony was obtained after transformation of ligated product into competent E.coli DH5a. This cycle was repeated multiple times.
What should i do after this point? Is the fragment too large for this vector or can i try a different V:I ratio again or should i use a commercial cloning kit? If so, which kits can be used in this case?
P.S: I have recently used these restriction enzymes and competent bacteria for another cloning experiment and there is no sign of contamination or faulty.
Relevant answer
Answer
If you are digesting the PCR amplicons directly, do ensure that you leave 3-5bp overhangs after the restriction site. Most restriction enzymes require 2-5bp away from the restriction site to sit on and cleave the DNA. This is why first cloning into a cloning vector like pCR-TOPO would be a good idea.
  • asked a question related to Cloning
Question
3 answers
Hi everyone
I'm trying to clone a gene sequence. I have designed specific primers on the gene sequence, but the PCR has more and more bands. I tried to clone, and later did a PCR with both sequence-specific primers and M13 universal primers, obtaining more bands on the gel. How do I get my one band? Do I have to perform the PCR? What do you suggest? Has anyone had this problem before?
Relevant answer
Hi Maria,
What are you performing the PCR on? A plasmid, linear DNA, bacteria? Maybe you have contamination within the sample. Do you have a negative control? Does it also have bands?
First I will make sure that the primers are not the problem: check that they don't bind anywhere else within the template DNA, also if you can design them so that they have a couple of C or G at their 3' end that will increase the affinity to the sequence, make sure that they are not over 5degrees Tm different. And that you are adding the correct primer molar concentration to the reaction!
If you are happy with how you designed your primers and there is no contamination in your starting sample then you should optimize the PCR conditions. You might be seeing multiple bands due to the primers annealing non-specifically to the template, this is normally solved by increasing the annealing temperature. Perform a gradient PCR increasing the annealing temperature in sets of 1 or 2 degrees for each sample, run them on a gel, and see which one has less non-specific bands. If you still have problems there are many troubleshooting guides, I like this one "https://www.bio-rad.com/en-uk/applications-technologies/pcr-troubleshooting?ID=LUSO3HC4S"
Good luck!
  • asked a question related to Cloning
Question
2 answers
Hello Everyone,
I am planing to conduct a Yeast One-Hybrid screen using the Takara Matchmaker Y1H Gold screening kit.
Reading trough the manual I did not really find information on how this strategy would ensure, that the cDNA library clones are translated in frame with the fused Gal4 activation domain. There is only one section elaborating on this problem saying, that yeast can tolerate frame shifts and as I understand still expresses the right protein.
As I remember in the past there used to be vector systems, where you could insert your cDNA clones in different frames (e.g. +1, +2, +3) and therefore one of the three vectors resulted an in-frame protein fusion. (for clarity: in such case you had to prepare 3 libraries one with each vector)
Maybe there is a trick during the SMART cDNA synthesis. I mean that the adaptors which are fused to the cDNA library clones for recombination cloning are ensuring that every third of the cloned transcripts are cloned in a different frame.
I would appreciate if anyone can clarify this question for me.
Relevant answer
Answer
Thank you Didier,
thank you, you make very good points.
I was considering to use oligo dT primers to ensure to clone full size transcripts. Therefore I hope that the adaptor in the 5' end of the transcript ensures the fusion of the Gal4 AD domain in all three frames.
I asked already Takara how they designed the system.
Thank you and best regards,
Janos
  • asked a question related to Cloning
Question
4 answers
Hello,
I am designing a plasmid with an SV40 promoter-driven antibiotic resistance. Does expression from an SV40 promoter require a TATA box upstream of the transcription start site? The original vector had a TATA box at -30, however this is lost in my cloning strategy. With my current plan, the transcription start site is just 8bp from the end of the SV40 promoter. Will this allow for expression, or is a TATA box needed?
Thanks!
Relevant answer
Answer
The SV40 (Simian virus 40) promoter is a strong viral promoter commonly used for driving gene expression in various experimental systems. While the presence of a TATA box upstream of the transcription start site is a common feature in many promoters, the SV40 promoter is unique in that it lacks a canonical TATA box.
The SV40 promoter utilizes an alternative mechanism for transcription initiation called the "TATA-less" promoter. Instead of relying on a TATA box, it utilizes other elements and transcription factors to initiate transcription. The absence of a TATA box in the SV40 promoter does not necessarily impair its ability to drive gene expression.
Therefore, in your current cloning strategy where the transcription start site is located just 8bp from the end of the SV40 promoter, it is likely that the expression can still occur without the presence of a TATA box. The SV40 promoter contains other regulatory elements and transcription factor binding sites that can facilitate transcription initiation.
However, it's worth noting that the exact transcriptional activity may depend on the specific context and the downstream sequence elements present in your plasmid. Experimental verification, such as measuring the expression levels of your gene of interest, can help confirm the functionality of the modified SV40 promoter in your specific system.
  • asked a question related to Cloning
Question
8 answers
I am trying to clone my gene of interest in plasmid but the colonies appear only on 25ug/ml Amp agar plates and not higher then that. Also when I am trying to grow the colonies in 25ug/ml Amp LB broth, no bacterial growth is observed. What could be the possible reason? And any solutions?
Relevant answer
Answer
I think your colonies are not plasmid contining if they do not grow in liquid culture. We routinely use 50ug/ml AMP on plates. If it is old, often AMP becomes less effective. Try Carbenicillin plates, which are more stable and effective.
  • asked a question related to Cloning
Question
3 answers
I have two linear DNA fragments that will be ligated together (each ~700 bp).
This fragment then needs to be ligated into a linearised vector (plasmid).
Would I need to perform a clean up on the first reaction, if it will be directly used for a successive ligation reaction?
Relevant answer
Answer
Yes, it is recommended to perform a clean-up step after each ligation reaction, even if it will be directly used for a successive ligation reaction.
The ligation reaction may generate unwanted byproducts, such as unligated fragments or ligated fragments that contain multiple inserts or mutations. These byproducts can interfere with the subsequent ligation reaction and reduce its efficiency.
Therefore, a clean-up step, such as gel electrophoresis or column purification, can help remove the unwanted byproducts and ensure that only the desired product is used for the subsequent ligation reaction.
Additionally, some ligases may require certain buffer conditions or DNA purity levels for optimal activity, so a clean-up step can also help ensure that the reaction conditions are suitable for efficient ligation.
These video playlists might be helpful to you:
  • asked a question related to Cloning
Question
3 answers
as i cloned promoter region in topo vector but somehow only 18oobp region was cloned instead of 2000bp
Relevant answer
Answer
Robert Adolf Brinzer Thak you! yes, I did. Amy Klocko Thank you.
  • asked a question related to Cloning
Question
1 answer
Hi there,
Is there anybody who can possibly share to me the sequence of the following plasmid: pMDC163, I need it in FASTA format please. I've only found the image of the plasmid but I can't find the sequence, I need it for a cloning process. I would really appreciate it if you could help me.
Greetings, Esmeralda.
Relevant answer
Answer
If this is the plasmid you are looking for: https://abrc.osu.edu/stocks/number/CD3-755
then you should be able to use standard Gateway(R) cloning to introduce your gene of interest. This means the exact sequencing of the plasmid is not needed.
  • asked a question related to Cloning
Question
3 answers
Hi, I need to amplify a tRNA fragment in a normal PCR,
The primers I designed suppose to give me a product of 40 base pairs. I want to transform it into pGEM and send it to Sanger sequencing . My question is what is the minimum size of PCR product that needs to be cloned and then sent to sequencing in order to get accurate sequencing?
Relevant answer
Answer
Typically, the first ~50 bases or so will not give a high-quality read. But the easy fix is to pick primers from the pGEM plasmid backbone that are at least 50 bp away from the insert.
The minimum size is whatever length of DNA you'd need that would be the entire tRNA. I'd go bigger than 40 bp. That's barely enough to get ~20 bp of the rRNA (plus ~20 bp of your primers). Why not design primers that would amplify the entire tRNA coding region?
  • asked a question related to Cloning
Question
3 answers
I have been tring to clone a 25 bp(5`-CACCGXXXX....-3` and 5`-AAACXXXX...C-3`) sgRNA into Px458.
I have been using this method : chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.csr-mgh.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/CRISPR_Cas9_PX458_protocol-1.pdf
However, I am not using plasmid safe
but so far all the colonies that I sequenced (with U6) have no sgRNA in them. I tried to picked 3,6, and 10 colonies but all of which where empty. has anyone faced such a problem? what should be done? any recommmendations?
Relevant answer
Answer
it will be better to do digest and ligate separately.
  • asked a question related to Cloning
Question
2 answers
I have been trying to clone a coding region of my gene in pdonr using gateway method. I successfully cloned CDS but when I sequenced the colony the region from the middle of about 100 BP was missing. What could be the possibly reason of that? Note: It doesn't have any other transcript. What should I do to overcome the issue?
Similarly, for promoter and coding region together, get colonies on zeocin resistant plates but I don't get positive colony PCR with specific primers. What should I do?
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi,
I would suggest to get it cloned from genscript. They will synthesize, clone and seq your whole plasmid with nominal cost. Comparing time, effort and money, getting is done by company is better option. Need help with that, get back I can put you through the right channel.
  • asked a question related to Cloning
Question
3 answers
Available products carry mutations in endonuclease genes cause they are used for cloning applications. Please advise. Thank you!
Relevant answer
Answer
You can purchase EcoR1 enzyme from various scientific supply companies such as Promega, New England Biolabs, and Sigma-Aldrich. You can also find bacteria expressing EcoR1 from ATCC and various other suppliers.
  • asked a question related to Cloning
Question
5 answers
I have to clone a gene below its native promoter but it is part of an operon, so I need to amplify the two genes separately and clone it in two steps.
I found a plasmid in my lab which already has the same gene cloned downstream of the native promoter but after analyzing the sequence, I found that there are two additional bases between the promoter and the START codon apart from the restriction site in between. I can perform PCR and amplify both sequences together by designing primers but the additional bases are going to increase the distance between the promoter and the gene. Would that create major problems during transcription?
Thank you.
Relevant answer
Answer
As long as your UTR does not have another start codon you should be fine.
  • asked a question related to Cloning
Question
4 answers
i am cloning my gene of interest in vector pet32 and pgex4t. upon transformation i got colony on antibiotic containing LB Agar. also colony pcr and pcr with the plasmid extracted from the clone showed the desired band on agrose gel electrophoresis. but when i was inducing them. i didn't got expression of that particular protein. please explain me reason behind it
Relevant answer
Answer
Hello,
1/ Do you have the plasmids in E. coli cells designed for protein overexpression and not cloning?
2/ Check the clones by sequencing (if e. g. a mutation introducing a stop codon is early in the gene, you will get no expression of the desired protein).
3/ The protein may be unstable in your expression strain. Try several protein expression strains.
4/ Sometimes, when overexpressing a protein, no extra band is apparent in the IPTG+ lane in total lysate but when you affinity purify it you still get a reasonable yield. If the sequencing validates your clone, I suggest to at least once attempt to purify it.
  • asked a question related to Cloning
Question
3 answers
I need to clone ftsZ gene from Mycoplasma gallisepticum. But the gene has 2 stop codons inside of it. I was told to use Gibson assembly, but I'm not sure how.
Relevant answer
Answer
Do you have the gene containing DNA fragment already on a plasmid (in E. coli)?
If yes, you can fast and easy do site directed mutagenesis PCR, this is a very efficient and useful method to quickly perform nucleotide substitutions or deletions. All you need is a PCR setup with a specific primer pair containing your sequence of interest (in your case: The sequence without a stop codon, where the nucleotides around the original stop codon should be in the center of your primer) and the DpnI enzyme.
With this primer pair you amplify the whole plasmid (which was extracted from E. coli) by PCR. Afterwards, you digest the template plasmid with digestion enzyme DpnI. Next, you transform E. coli with your digested PCR product, extract the plasmid DNA, and repeat the whole procedure with primers for your second stop codon.
You can see here, for more detailed information: https://blog.addgene.org/site-directed-mutagenesis-by-pcr
  • asked a question related to Cloning
Question
5 answers
I have been using NEB Hifi Gibson assembly for a couple years now and I've been quite happy with it. I regularly make plasmid constructs with 4-8 fragments, and always >1/4 of the colonies are "perfect," while the remaining ones may have some SNPs at the joining sites, or be misassembled due to a repetitive region.
Some colleagues said that Golden Gate has even higher efficiency. That even with 8 fragments, it is normal for 50-100% of colonies to be perfect. Is that true? Is Golden Gate that perfect?
Relevant answer
Answer
The efficiency of Gibson cloning is higher than that of Golden Gate. Gibson cloning is a one-step assembly method that uses a DNA ligase enzyme to join two or more DNA fragments together. It is highly efficient, with reported success rates of up to 95%. Golden Gate cloning is a two-step assembly method that relies on a restriction enzyme and a DNA ligase to join two or more DNA fragments together. This method is less efficient, with reported success rates of up to 80%.
  • asked a question related to Cloning
Question
2 answers
Searching for the correct monoclonal antibody has been quite hard, because, although in most cases companies specify the region/epitope of the antibody (e.g. extracellular domain, 1-20 aa etc), in others there is only the clone id and no more information.
In particular, I am looking for the epitope of TR75-54 or 54.7 clone of a TNFR2 monoclonal Ab. Any advice would be valuable! Thank you!
Relevant answer
Answer
Thank you!
  • asked a question related to Cloning
Question
2 answers
Since lentiviruses are known to preferentially integrate into the transcriptionally active sites in the genome, I am wondering if there was a simple and effective strategy to identify clones that have the lentiviral insert integrated into the genome but not on any site with functional consequence. I would really appreciate any helpful suggestions.
Thanks
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi ! Considering ideally that one particle of LV will infect one cell, how many integration will occur in the cell? Thank you
  • asked a question related to Cloning
Question
1 answer
What are the benefits of adding a pre print of Article in RG ? Will the there any issue in publishing online later on ?
Relevant answer
Answer
Saying “All UGC Care” journals is somewhat too strongly put, but indeed there is a list of known examples of hijacked journals listed by UGC Care which can be found here:https://ugccare.unipune.ac.in/Apps1/Home/Index (click on Group I or Group II). More examples and discussions about this serious form of misconduct can be found here:
The best and most complete and update source of identified examples of hijacked titles can be found here:
Best regards.
  • asked a question related to Cloning
Question
14 answers
Hello All,
I'm facing a problem while transforming genes into P. pastoris. Actually, I'm trying to express an antibody heterologously in P. pastoris. So, for that I engineered the vector pPIZalphaA in such a way that two genes (heavy and light chain gene) of the antibody were inserted under two AOX1 promoters individually. Then I cloned the vector into DH5alpha, confirmed the colonies, and then isolated the plasmid. After linearization of plasmid, I transformed it into P. pastoris GS115 via chemical and electroporation both the methods. After 2-3days, I got several colonies, and I cofirmed the clones by PCR using heavy and light chain specific primers via colony pcr and pcr with genomic DNA of those clones. Mostly, all the colonies were confirmed with light chain integration and barely 2-3 colonies were confirmed with the integration of both light and heavy chain genes. Then, I selected those 2-3 colonies for further expression studies and initially I got expression (secretion into the medium) of the antibody (~150 kDa) which was confirmed by SDS-PAGE. After certain time (approximately 20-25 days) when I performed the same expression studies again, I didn't get the expression from the the same clones. Then I did genomic DNA extraction of the same clones and did PCR with heavy and light chain primers. I got the amplification of light chain gene only, heavy chain amplification was missing. Simillarly, I made fresh recombinants also and again I observed that after certain time, heavy chain gene amplification was missing. So, I'm not getting why the heavy chain gene is missed out, or else it is becoming unstable within the genome of Pichia after certain generations. I need some expert's opinion on this matter.
Thank you
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear @Li
I couldn't find any solution to this problem, so, I screened a lot of clones and from there I got few positive (having both the genes) ones, then I checked the expression once for all, later I performed continuos subculturing of those positive clones, from there I got 1-2 clones in which both the genes remained intact after several rounds (8-10) of subculturing and now I'm using those for further studies, getting results as well.
  • asked a question related to Cloning
Question
6 answers
Hello everyone, I have one doubt regarding cloning ?
I am using pET30a (+) vector for cloning (5422bp) and Insert size 804bp. I tried all the ligation reaction ratio lilke 1:3, 1:5, 1;7 (100ng vector and 300ng Insert) but some time I got positive colonies but the problems is that whenever i am going to isolate the plasmid, I donot found the plasmid in the positve colonies
Please give me some suggestion
what should I do for it
Relevant answer
Answer
How are you checking the colonies for presence of the plasmid? I assume that you are streaking and also making a liquid overnight culture? Then plasmid prep, then PCR. Sometimes, you have to linearize the plasmid to get efficient PCR. Pick a rare cutter that you know will NOT cut in the insert.
Double-check that the antibiotic you are using for the overnight growth is the correct concentration. It's really easy to "drop" a plasmid if you remove the antibiotic selection.
Good luck!
  • asked a question related to Cloning
Question
2 answers
I was thinking what if we use the different promoters for any gene which is being cloned in living organisms? For example what if we use the promoter of a different gene for a different gene which is being cloned? what results can be observed? Wither would it overexpress the gene or downregulate it?
Relevant answer
Answer
In multicellular organisms it can even change where the gene is expressed. If the CDS is for a transcription factor then even larger morphological effects can often be observed.
  • asked a question related to Cloning
Question
1 answer
while doing klenow reaction for blunt end cloning,i am not getting why it is necessary to add dNTPS to chew 3' overhangs
Relevant answer
Answer
because the exonuclease does not stop when the fragment is flush but can continue recessing the DNA. So by having nucleotides the polymerase activity can fill it back in to keep it flush.
  • asked a question related to Cloning
Question
1 answer
One of the projects that I am working on calls for the need for cloning and transformation in cotton. For this project, I plan to perform RNAi-mediated gene silencing using pHELLSGATE 4.
Relevant answer
Answer
  • asked a question related to Cloning
Question
4 answers
I cloned a fairly large cDNA into a pcDps backbone previously modified with a BsrGI restriction site. I was able to cut the cDNA out of a plasmid with the respective enzyme and inserted it into the vector. I performed a test digest with BsrGI and got the expected product.
However, after performing a test digest with BsrGI and BsaI, I noticed that one band was missing. This was always the lowest band, even after I repeated it with a different enzyme that cut into both the backbone and the construct.
Does anyone have any idea what this could cause because I actually assume that the construct is intact when I remove it from another plasmid?
Thanks for help :)
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi there,
You may not have cloned the right cDNA. Did you check the construct by sequencing?
  • asked a question related to Cloning
Question
4 answers
Hello,
I have performed some recombineering protocols and realised that the chances of my plasmid being in a multimeric state are quite high.
I previously designed 7 primer pairs that will produce alternating amplicons of 500 and 700 bp around my recombineered plasmid (which is 35kb) just so that I could get an idea that no weird recombination events occurred when looking at it in a gel.
Anyways, I did the 7 PCR reactions on a control with the original plasmid, and they produced the expected pattern, but when performing it on my miniprep-purified plasmid I was obtaining a lot of bands of all sorts of sizes (larger and shorter than expected amplicon). Funny thing is that these multiple bands seemed to follow the same pattern in all my replicates (different pattern for each primer of course, but same throughout the different colonies tested) which makes me rule out the possibility of salt contaminants affecting primer binding etc. I thought it might be bacterial genomic contamination that was being amplified, so I performed a CsCl-ethidium bromide density gradient to purify it and sent it off for sequencing.
But now Im wondering, would a multimeric plasmid yield multiple bands if amplified with a single pair of primers?
By the way, I can't run it on a gel to assess if it's multimeric because of its large size 35kb, although I am going to ask if anyone at my lab has a pulse field gel electrophoresis just in case.
Thanks!
Relevant answer
Hi all,
Thank you for your answers,
I did a restriction digest with enzymes that cut multiple times and indeed, this plasmid has recombined in all sorts of ways except the one I was planning on...
I don't know if any of you have practiced recombineering before, but if you have I would really appreciate your advice regarding how to reduce unwanted recombination events in this type of cloning.
I am using an L-arabinose inducible plasmid for the λRed system. Are NEB10betas good cells for these protocols or maybe Stabl3 would be a better option? Also, would co-electroporating my plasmid at very low concentrations and the linear dsDNA into E. coli (which contains the induced λRed system-plasmid) help in avoiding these undesired recombinations?
Any other thoughts or help on how to avoid this?
Thanks!
  • asked a question related to Cloning
Question
2 answers
I had sent my article to a journal, but then I realised it was a fake one or a clone and I withdrew my paper. Now, I wish to delete it. The title is ADVOCATING DEEP ECOLOGY IN MASURKAR'S SHERNI. By mistake, I chose the option IT IS NOT MY ARTICLE. Now I want to permanently delete this article. How can I do so? Kindly help me.
Regards,
Sujatha Menon
Relevant answer
Answer
As far as I can see your paper is unfortunately still present at their website https://www.sumc.lt/index.php/se/article/view/898/702 For those interested, indeed there is a fake (hijacked version) active https://www.sumc.lt/index.php/se/index (they hijacked the ISSN 1392-5369) and published by Science Research Society (SRS).
Indeed the legit and genuine journal can be found here https://www.journals.vu.lt/special-education and Scopus mentioned this real homepage as well https://www.scopus.com/sourceid/21100223584?origin=sbrowse (use both ISSN 1392-5369 and ISSN 2424-3299).
Anyway, back to your question. I think you can (re)claim authorship of the link here at RG https://www.researchgate.net/publication/362746881_Advocating_Deep_Ecology_in_Masurkar%27s_Sherniand then go to button “More” and remove the paper. If this all somehow does not seem to work, you should contact the RG team: https://www.researchgate.net/contact and/or RG support team is using this contact e-mail: support@researchgate.net
When it comes to the paper in the cloned version of the journal it will be a matter of “hope and pray” on whether they will honor your request to withdraw/retract the paper. The point is that they are obviously essentially criminals with no other intention than to mislead victims and grabbing as much money as they can. Following proper publishing practices, such as retracting/withdrawing a paper on authors request, is unfortunately not that likely.
Best regards.
PS. For those wondering whether the journal might be hijacked one can check this excellent source: https://retractionwatch.com/the-retraction-watch-hijacked-journal-checker/ (indeed the title Specialusis Ugdymas is included).
  • asked a question related to Cloning
Question
5 answers
Anyone with experience with cloning using E.coli DH5Alfa and Pjet 1.2 plasmid who can share their experience with me? I've been trying to understand and identify if my clones are showing DNA supercoiling, but it's been very difficult to find out about it. Plasmid linearization is a rare subject to find (at least where I looked). Thank you in advance for your contributions.
Relevant answer