Climate Change - Science topic

* model

* rule and regulation ( new2023)

Dear Colleagues,

The energy transition, also known as the shift from fossil-based energy systems to low-carbon and renewable energy sources, is critical to addressing climate change. Environmental analyses guide the energy transition, as they provide valuable insights into the technical, economic, and social aspects of adopting renewable energy sources and mitigating climate change impacts.

Renewable energy sources are essential due to their potential to significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions and curb reliance on fossil fuels. However, the integration of renewable energy into existing energy systems requires the consideration of various aspects, such as resource availability, intermittency, storage, and grid infrastructure, which necessitates sophisticated and comprehensive analyses.

Furthermore, the urgency of addressing climate change cannot be overstated in the context of energy transition. As the world faces the challenges of rising temperatures, changing weather patterns, and environmental degradation, transitioning to renewable energy sources is crucial to mitigate the impacts of climate change. Complex analyses play a pivotal role in evaluating the environmental, social, and economic impacts of energy systems, assessing the potential risks and benefits of renewable energy deployment, and informing policy and decision-making processes.

Research papers that contribute to the understanding of renewable energy sources, and climate change aspects in the context of energy transition are highly encouraged and welcomed to advance the knowledge and inform evidence-based policies in this critical field.

Dr. Viktor Sebestyén Guest Editor

I just took a look at the document just signed in Paris in Nov-Dec 2015 to deal with the issue of global warming, which apparently is to be implemented through sustainable development means:

I am surprised to see they have not defined what type of sustainable development model or market structure is the one that they are using to address the global warming issue since the word "sustainability" seems to be nowhere. There seem to be different indirect definitions of sustainable development in ARTICLE 2, 4, 6, 7, 8, and 10 in the appendix

Are we going to use different sustainable development models or market structures at the same time to deal with the same issue? If yes, how are we going to compare results if using different methodologies later on to monitor progress and if possible link results/responsibilities?

Has anyone else notice this? What type of sustainable development model  or market structure is the UN using against global warming?

Do coral reefs and phytoplankton and fish have major impacts on the energy budget of snowpack, and drought and global climate change and global warming?

my research subject is climate change and asthmatic disease

How does climate change affect Himalayan water resources and components of Himalayan river flows in a changing climate?

Cleaning my bookshelf (and eliminating some items), I found a book the title of which ran: "How to read Heidegger" --- My reply: In no way! Do not do that. --- I did it, and I wrote long ago that I had not found in Heidegger anything which seemed to me (1) understandable, (2) true, (3) relevant and (4) new at the same time. --- Why is Heidegger considered a great philosopher? His exotic language does have a poetic dimension, but it looks empty at the level of content.

In your opinion, can the new technologies of Industry 4.0, including especially artificial intelligence, machine learning, deep learning applied in combination with big data, information and knowledge collected and processed on Big Data Analytics platforms help the development of sustainable organic agriculture based on planning, arranging and managing biodiverse, multi-species crops of agricultural crops?

The process of planning, designing, arranging sustainable crops of agricultural crops grown according to the formula of organic agriculture, which aims to restore highly sustainable, biodiverse natural agricultural ecosystems, should take into account many factors that are a mix of natural biotic, climatic, geological and abiotic factors and changes in these factors that have taken place over the last centuries or millennia within the framework of the development of human, unsustainable civilisation, the development of a robber economy based on intensive industrial development with ignoring the issue of negative externalities towards the surrounding environment.

Considering how this should be a complex, multifaceted process of planning, designing, managing and restoring highly sustainable biodiverse forest and sustainable agricultural ecosystems, the application in this process of new generations of Industry 4.0 technologies, including, above all, artificial intelligence based on large sets of data, information and knowledge concerning many different aspects of nature, ecology, climate, civilisation, etc. collected and processed on Big Data Analytics platforms may prove to be of great help.

In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:

What is your opinion?

What is your opinion on this subject?

Please respond,

I invite you all to discuss,

Thank you very much,

Best wishes,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

How does climate change affect the microbiome andbiome doe’s climate change affect and relationship between climate and biomes?

Dear Researcher,

Global Climate Models (GCMs) of Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) are numerical models that represent the various physical systems of the Earth's climate with respect to the surface of the land, oceans, atmosphere, and cryosphere, and these are employed to provide likely changes in future climate projections. I wanted to know what are the initial and lateral boundary conditions used while developing the models.

Sincerely,

Aman Srivastava

The Department of Analysis of marine ecosystems and anthropogenic impacts of the Ukrainian Scientific Center of Ecology of the Sea, where I work, is going to apply for EURIZON Fellowship and we need a partnership from European Union. Here are the details of the program https://indico.desy.de/event/38700/.  The deadline is on 8/05. The name of the project is " The investigation of small saline groundwater dependent ecosystems biodiversity the arid zone (Odesa region, Ukraine) and evaluation it pre-war conditions. ". We have an archive with samples of zoobenthos and zooplankton, collected at ~190 sampling points on different substrates within ~ 30 limnocrenes, rheocrenes and helocrenes with salinity over 5 ‰ different seasons during the free time 2017-2021. We are planning to use this archive for the EURIZON fellowship, but because of war, our institution has no opportunity to take new samples in the Black Sea and limans.

I wrote to several colleges from Finland and Germany, but now they can take part. So I hope for the help of RG community.

We are studying the impact of climate change on t land use change and plant cover evolution. We need publications on how to know the impact of climate change solely (without the antropogenic factors) on the reduction of forest and agrosystem plants cover.

Thanks.

What are possible influence of enthalpy, entropy and free energy in the process of climate change? Is there any dynamic equilibrium with all energy-changing processes in climate change occur?

How can climate smart agriculture support the achievement of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, particularly those related to poverty reduction, food security, and climate action?

As a consequence of the 2012 green market paradigm shift avoidance all countries are left on their own to address the environmental crisis without a common green market framework to promote, expand, and nurture economic activity systematically.

All countries are following different versions of dwarf green markets and different definitions of green, some of them that are inconsistent with green market thinking, but politically viable....But politically viable, does not make it right as when you burn the gas you get CO2.....

For example, the EU came out with the definition of "green gas" to solve a political problem, in an environmentally unfriendly manner.. Now the US came out with the definition of "polluting gas" as CO2 from burning it is air pollution to address a political problem, but in an environmentally friendly way…. and this raises the question, .Who is wrong: The EU / Green gas or the USA / Polluting gas?.

What do you think?

What are the most effective ways to promote climate smart agricultural practices among small-scale farmers in developing countries, and what role can governments and NGOs play in this effort?

How can sustainable land management practices be used to improve soil health, increase biodiversity, and reduce greenhouse gas emissions?

What are the most promising technologies for reducing agricultural emissions, such as methane from livestock, and how can they be scaled up and deployed?

Climate change is a reality. However, the world has accepted it. But the oil-producing countries come in front of this reality. They don't believe this fact because they think that they will suffer from the cessation of fossil fuel production. Due to this, they are not allowing clean energy policies in the world. Saudi Arabia, China, Russia, Iran, America, and some other Gulf countries whose economy runs on oil. They are not ready to follow international protocols and deals regarding climate change. But they probably don't know that the consumption of fossil fuels will increase due to the tyranny of these countries. Due to this greenhouse gases will be produced. This will further destroy the ozone layer. The temperature of the earth will increase further. When the temperature increases, the weather will change because of it. The result will be that agriculture will be destroyed, due to which food shortage will occur. The melting of glaciers will increase natural disasters. The intensity of heat will increase. Pandemic outbreaks would be common. Scientists are already making predictions. But some black sheep feed/skeptics, who been fed the money by oil companies. They are also creating division among people by giving different opinions. But it is a fact that if the world does not make timely decisions, there will be a lot of loss. God forbid, its effects will be on the whole world. Millions of lives may be lost. So there is still time. The world should take climate change seriously and find a solution to it.

What is the importance of Himalayan Mountains in India and impact of climate change on Himalayas?

What is the importance of Himalayas in Indian climate and Himalaya and coastal states of India will be affected by climate change?

What is the effect of climate change on river system in India and how does climate change affect environment?

How does climate change affect river flow and impact of climate change on water resources?

What are the components of river flow and components of Himalayan river flows in a changing climate?

What is the role of microbes in maintaining temperature and microbial diversity changing with climate change?

What are the effects of climate change on living organisms and the environment and environmental temperature affect microbial physiology?

Why are coastal climates more moderate than inland climates and climate change around coastal areas less dramatic than being further inland?

Including assessment of the robustness of results.

Happy for enlightenment.

What are the potential impacts of climate change on microbial communities and of microbes in improving environmental quality?

What are the causes of climate change and effects of climate change and relationship between climate change and displacement?

What is the role of microbes in maintaining temperature and does climate change affect the microbiome?

Why was it important to keep the growing microbes at a warm temperature and importance of microbes in climate change?

As the internet ecosystems seem to grow exponentially, would be interesting to learn more about the carbon footprint correlation. Concave? Linear? Fixed?

Knowing this distribution provides a good chance to regulate crop planting date to be shorter than usual state to consume less water in order to be more adaptive in climate changes circumstances.

How is climate change affecting agriculture in Pakistan?

Indicators like precipitation intensity, duration, geology, etc.

I am searching for relative information about Nestle's contribution on climate and the environment. I wonder if the company has ever done some negative or opposite to the goal of protecting the environment or if there is any strong evidence that shows they did what they promised. Thanks a lot!

The essence of sustainability derives from the study of sustainable, human-interference-free, biodiverse natural ecosystems of specific natural environments, which contain a wealth of species of flora, fauna and micro-organisms linked by many different ecological relationships. The ideas of sustainability are applied in developing the characteristics of sustainability in various aspects of human activity, the development of civilisation, various aspects of the economy, etc. The importance of the role of sustainability and its application in the context of economic development is growing in direct proportion to the scale of the increase in the negative effects of the development of human civilisation, which include the increasing scale of environmental pollution, the increasing scale of deforestation, the increasing scale of betonosis i.e. These include the increasing scale of environmental pollution, growing scale of deforestation, increasing scale of betonosis, i.e. urbanised areas and shrinking green areas in cities, growing emissions of greenhouse gases, accelerating greenhouse effect, accelerating global warming, growing scale of soil depletion, forest fires, weather anomalies and climatic and natural disasters, decline of biodiversity of the planet's natural ecosystems, etc. The aim is to reverse these negative processes, which have a negative impact on the environment. In order to reverse these negative processes and save as much of the planet's threatened biosphere as possible, it is necessary to carry out a green transformation of the economy on a multifaceted scale. In this respect, a system of 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) has been defined within the framework of cyclical UN conferences on this issue and the global problems of climate change, which should be implemented on as large a scale as possible in order to reduce the scale of action and negative effects of unsustainable, intensive, rapid economic development within the framework of a predatory brown economy based on high scale exploitation of natural resources, including non-renewable natural resources, energy production mainly based on dirty fossil fuel combustion energy, increasing scale of environmental pollution, increasing scale of greenhouse gas emissions, negligible scale of secondary raw material use and recycling, accelerating global warming, rapid degradation of the biosphere, decline of biodiversity, etc. One of the key aspects of achieving a green transformation of the economy is to build a zero-carbon economy based on sustainable, zero-carbon, green energy, i.e. the development of renewable and zero-carbon energy sources. This is essential and should be realised in 100% by the end of this decade of the 2030s at the latest if the main strategic goal of international environmental and climate policy is to be met, i.e. to halt the global average global atmospheric temp. increase of max. 1.5 degrees C since the beginning of the first industrial revolution. This goal was defined and established for implementation at the UN conference on this issue, i.e. during the so-called Paris Agreement of 2015. Of course, the green transformation of the economy is a much more multifaceted process, in which all sectors and branches of the economy, many fields of human activity, many aspects of the development of civilisation, the ongoing development of energy, industry, agriculture, technological progress, etc. should be involved in practice. The green transformation of the economy should take place within the framework of a pro-environmental and pro-climate transformation of the classic growth, brown, linear economy of excess to a sustainable, green, zero-emission growth and closed loop economy, in which the implementation of the goals of sustainable development and increasing the scale of sustainability at the level of development of civilisation in relation to the surrounding environment should be strategically important objectives.

In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:

And what is your opinion on this?

What is your opinion on this subject?

Please respond,

I invite you all to discuss,

Thank you very much,

Best wishes,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

Greetings to all the researchers around the world!

I have a few queries regarding climate change modeling. Any info regarding this would be highly appreciated.

2. As far as I understood, the MARKSIM version 1.1 asks for the .clx file to be given as input. I found the web link where I can generate the .clx file. I am providing the link below.

Is there any other option to generate the .clx file?

3. In the above link, data for IPCC AR5 can be provided. Is there any weather generator that is capable of working with AR6 datasets?

Please help. I really appreciate any help you can provide.

The environmental cost of plastic pollution refers to the negative impact that plastic waste has on the natural environment, including both marine and terrestrial ecosystems. This impact can take many forms, such as entanglement of wildlife, ingestion of plastic by animals, and disruption of food webs. Plastic waste can also contribute to greenhouse gas emissions and climate change, as well as soil and water pollution. The long-term effects of plastic pollution on the environment are still largely unknown, but they could have far-reaching consequences for ecosystems and human health. Addressing the environmental cost of plastic pollution requires a comprehensive approach, including reducing the use of single-use plastics, promoting recycling and waste reduction, and implementing policies to hold companies accountable for their environmental impact.

Which newspapers are the main distributors of climate-related content? The German market has been thoroughly screened and the compartmentalized clusters are striking. How big is the gap in the Anglo-Saxon media market?

Climate change is a major concern for the future which bad impacts already functioning by increasing natural calamities. But global climate change is a buzzword rather than work for climate adaptation, polar icebergs are melting, and natural forests are diminishing by destroying biodiversity, and ecological balance in the forest, wetlands, and sea. World leaders must be serious regarding climate economics, climate refuses and for adaptation policy that is climate resilience,

Voluntary work should include saving our future world by reducing carbon footprint, and CFC gas emissions,s and saving natural forests.

WHAT WE CAN DO MORE? HOW DO YOU LIKE TO CONTRIBUTE?

Picture: Internet

My PhD research is: Future research of food industry businesses in the context of climate change - what model do you suggest for me to implement?

Why do grasslands have high resilience and why is it so important that we protect sea grass meadows for mitigating climate change?

How do mangroves and sea grasses contribute toward mitigating climate change and seaweed farming that could help fight climate change?

Hello everyone,

I am currently working as a sustainability data scientist, and I'm intending to conduct independent research at the intersection of climate change and machine learning. I am highly proficient in data analysis, visualization, time series forecasting, supervised machine learning and natural language processing. Furthermore, I have substantial knowledge in the domains of climate change, biodiversity and sustainability in general. Here are a few examples of my past work:

In case you are interested in collaborating, I encourage you to leave a comment or message me. Thanks you for taking the time to read this post!

Regards,

Giannis Tolios

Energy is at the heart of the climate challenge – and key to the solution. A large chunk of the greenhouse gases that blanket the Earth and trap the sun’s heat are generated through energy production, by burning fossil fuels to generate electricity and heat.

Fossil fuels, such as coal, oil and gas, are by far the largest contributor to global climate change, accounting for over 75 percent of global greenhouse gas emissions and nearly 90 percent of all carbon dioxide emissions. The science is clear: to avoid the worst impacts of climate change, emissions need to be reduced by almost half by 2030 and reach net-zero by 2050. To achieve this, we need to end our reliance on fossil fuels and invest in alternative sources of energy that are clean, accessible, affordable, sustainable, and reliable. Renewable energy sources – which are available in abundance all around us, provided by the sun, wind, water, waste, and heat from the Earth – are replenished by nature and emit little to no greenhouse gases or pollutants into the air. Fossil fuels still account for more than 80 percent of global energy production, but cleaner sources of energy are gaining ground. About 29 percent of electricity currently comes from renewable sources.

source: Renewable energy – powering a safer future | United Nations

Where is the threshold of existence for the local species? Which ones can adapt to a potentially steam sauna-like ecosystem?

Interested in good research about the tipping points of the most relevant species around the equator?

I am looking for the freshwater discharge data of Volga river for the recent years. It seems that the European Space Agency's Climate Change Initiative (ESA CCI) provides estimates of freshwater discharge in one of its projects. Do you know how can I access this dataset?

International Day of Forests, which is celebrated annually on 21 March and was established by the UN General Assembly on 28 November 2012, is an opportunity to reflect on the systemic improvement of forest management in order to simultaneously preserve natural forest ecosystems, enhance the protection of biodiversity, the biosphere and the planet's climate. The celebration of the International Day of Forests aims to raise human awareness of the importance of forests for humans, including the crucial importance of forests in the context of protecting the planet's climate and biosphere. Taking into account the protection of the planet's climate, biosphere and biodiversity of natural ecosystems, it is urgently necessary to transform rabid forest management into rational, pro-climate and pro-environmental forest management. Forest management carried out within the framework of rational, pro-climate and pro-environmental forest management should be carried out in such a way that natural multi-species forest ecosystems are restored as much as possible instead of monocultures of homogeneous stands. When monocultures of forests based on a small number of tree species or even with the dominance of a single tree species are carried out, the incidence of various viral, fungal diseases and tree pests increases significantly. In addition, monocultures dominated by coniferous species are much more prone to the appearance and development of forest fires during the summer season. Tree monocultures are also unfavourable for the coexistence and development of many forest animal species that are found in natural, multi-species forest forests and primeval forests. Unfortunately, in terms of pseudo forest management, archaic forest management practices of monocultures based on a few tree species are still in use, which also causes a significant decline in the biodiversity of natural ecosystems. Accordingly, forest management should pursue rational, pro-climate, pro-environmental, biodiversity-sensitive forest management instead of commercial-oriented predatory management. In addition, forest management plans should respect the principles of nature conservation, protection of rare and endangered species of fauna and flora, protection against the felling of old trees, protection of the biodiversity of natural ecosystems, etc., which is also important in the context of the scale of CO2 absorption from the atmosphere, and is therefore an additional factor in limiting the scale of the ever-increasing greenhouse effect and the global warming process.

In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:

What do you think about this topic?

What is your opinion on this subject?

Please respond,

I invite you all to discuss,

Thank you very much,

Best regards,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

Climate change has greatly impacted on Agricultural Production and Productivity in Sub-Saharan Africa. What can be done? (Mitigation and Adaption Practices)

What are the mitigation strategies to manage the impact of climate change and its effects on crop production in India?

The era of accelerated development of civilisation, significantly accelerating the scale of matter processing, production processes, the scale of environmental pollution, consumption of renewable and non-renewable natural resources, greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, loss of biodiversity, etc. is referred to as the Anthropocene epoch, the Great Acceleration and Ecological Catastrophe has been taking place primarily since the mid-20th century. The term Anthropocene has not yet been introduced into the history of the development of planet Earth by geologists, but this is likely to happen soon. In the Anthropocene epoch, humans are increasingly transforming the biosphere into the technosphere. However, the scale of consumption of non-renewable raw materials is steadily increasing. The stocks of biodiverse forest areas that absorb part of the CO2 emitted by humans are continuing to decline rapidly. The supply of clean drinking water is also declining in increasingly large areas inhabited by humans. On the other hand, the scale of waste separation and recycling is still negligible and does not even compensate for a significant part of the consumption of raw materials and hardly reduces the level of waste pollution. The scale of the ongoing green transformation of the economy, including the implementation of a pro-environmental and pro-climate transformation of the classic growth, brown, linear economy of excess to a sustainable, green, zero-emission growth and closed loop economy is still too small to significantly reduce the level of greenhouse gas emissions, reduce the level of environmental pollution, implement reforestation processes and counteract the accelerating process of global warming is too small. It is essential to integrate a key aspect of the circular economy into the green transformation of the economy, i.e. the concept of zero growth consisting of zeroing out economic growth. This zeroing of economic growth should be implemented in a multi-faceted and multi-year perspective. It is not about zeroing economic growth in the short term (a few months) or in the medium term (a few years), i.e. as a periodic slowdown in economic growth occurring cyclically, within business cycles of several years during economic crises. It is about permanently resetting the rate of economic growth with the recognition of this issue as a key factor in a circular economy. Consequently, the economics of economic growth should be changed into the economics of zero growth, i.e. according to the concept of zero growth already known for several decades but not applied. An important issue of the Anthropocene epoch is also the rapidly progressing and human-induced extinction process of many species of flora and fauna referred to as the great 6th extinction in the history of the development of life on the planet. Consequently, the scale of the loss of biodiversity of the planet's natural ecosystems is progressing rapidly. Paradoxically, the great extinction of millions of species of flora and fauna was caused by just one species of living organisms - homo sapiens. Paradoxically, homo sapiens, which is responsible for this, is widely acknowledged to be the most intelligent species of life forms found on planet Earth. On the other hand, it is assumed that 99 per cent of the species that have lived on Earth over the last 3.5 billion years are extinct or have evolved into other species. But it is extremely difficult to estimate both the number of species and the duration of their existence for those of many millions of years ago and in the context of the evolutionary process. However, an extremely paradoxical and sad all at once process taking place in the Anthropocene epoch is that the acknowledged most intelligent single species of life form on Earth, which is homo sapiens, due to its robbery, combustion economy and rapid development of civilisation based on unlimited greed and disrespect for the surrounding nature, is causing the degradation of both the climate and the biosphere of the planet. Therefore, what has recently been described as a climate crisis should be studied, described, etc. in connection with the ecological crisis determined by the rapidly progressing process of deforestation, degradation of the biosphere, pollution of the natural environment, extinction of many species of flora and fauna life forms and, as a consequence, a rapidly decreasing level of biodiversity of the natural ecosystems of the planet Earth. Thus, the main negative effects of the development of a predatory, combustion-based civilisation and the key attributes of the Anthropocene epoch include not only a climate crisis but also an ecological crisis. The human-induced crises can thus be collectively referred to as the climate-ecological crisis. These crises should be considered, studied, analysed, described, etc. together because there are many relationships between them, synergistic processes, analogous and mutually influencing. By analogy, the process of a future climate catastrophe, which may already occur at the end of this 21st century if man does not manage to bring about a complete green transformation of the economy by 2030, should also be studied, analysed, projected, described, etc., in conjunction with the loss of biodiversity, the degradation of the biosphere, the extinction of species, etc., and thus the ecological catastrophe of the planet. By combining these issues, it is therefore possible and necessary to study, analyse, forecast and describe the future climatic-ecological catastrophe of the planet. If this catastrophe occurs in an extremely negative scenario then the Anthropocene epoch will be over.

In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:

What do you think about this?

What is your opinion on this subject?

Please respond,

I invite you all to discuss,

Thank you very much,

Warm regards,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

Can I find someone who has information about the " 2nd Global Summit on Earth Science and Climate Change "(Adv. ESCC 2023)" conference ? Is it a real international conference? Has anyone ever participated in the first edition?

What are the reasons why it is so hard to completely degreenhouse the agricultural sector?

What is the yearly minimum level in the next decades in billion tons in GHG to expect?

Which is the most promising, apart from forestry projects?

Will wide private adaption occur at a projected break-even monetary level?

Published in March 2023, the new report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) of UN scientists summarises the previous 6 IPCC reports produced and published between 2018 and 2022. These reports have involved a huge amount of scientific work, many thousands of scientific papers have been examined. Thousands of scientific reviews were produced, in which around 100,000 different aspects, comments etc. were included and reviewed. The analysis shows, among other things, that more than 99 per cent of the scientific papers support the thesis that human civilisation has led to a significant and accelerating increase in greenhouse gas emissions since the beginning of the first industrial revolution, which has become a key factor in the increasingly rapid process of global warming. Studies and estimates show that 2.5 trillion tonnes of CO2 have been released into the atmosphere since the mid-19th century, with half of this amount entering the atmosphere in the last three decades. It has been estimated that 3.5 billion people are at risk of serious negative impacts from the ongoing global warming process. According to the results of the study, the processes of green transformation of the economy should be significantly accelerated, including the rate of decarbonisation of economic processes. without this acceleration, the strategic goal of global climate policy established during the Paris Agreement in 2015, which is to limit the scale of the increase in the temperature of the planet's atmosphere to max. 1.5 degrees C since the beginning of the first industrial revolution, i.e. since the 17th century. In order for this goal to be realistically achievable, it is necessary to significantly accelerate the implementation of the green transformation of the economy, so as to halve CO2 emissions by 2030 at the latest and achieve total zero-emission of the economy by 2050. Unfortunately, the populist, opportunistic economic policies supported by the dirty combustion energy sector, including pseudo-climatic policies, continue to ignore the results of scientific research, including the UN IPCC reports on the role of man as regards the sources of the increasingly rapid process of global warming.

In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:

What do you think about this topic?

What is your opinion on this subject?

Please respond,

I invite you all to discuss,

Thank you very much,

Best wishes,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

What are the adaptation strategies for climate change in agriculture India and can agricultural systems be adapted to reduce the impact of climate change?

I am seeking professional input on addressing climate change. In my work, I have seen decades of debate or hesitation of buy in by financial markets to actually address the main problem at play: the anthropogenic over-production of carbon dioxide and destruction of planetary carbon sinks. When we address this anthropogenic problem we say human-caused climate change or global warming or climate crisis. So far, despite saying we need to change, little action, especially in finance, takes place, especially on the scale needed. Often, the problem itself is too confusing and too large of a problem to really tackle a solution that is obvious and measurable.

My scope of work is looking at changing the common vernacular use of climate change to address the exact problem at hand: the anthropogenic over-production of dissolved CO2 gas into the atmosphere and destruction of planetary carbon sinks. The goal is to call that Global Carbon Crisis vs. what we have been calling it with confusion, climate change. After all, climate change has been an ongoing, natural process since the advent of polar ice caps.

The additional piece I am looking to address is the effective measurability which is already an infrastructure in place, called the Global Carbon Index. Essentially measuring a specific location CO2 production by contrast to overall global production at time of measurement.

What I am hoping to accomplish is a discussion if climate change to address this real problem should be used any more and why or why not. Also, to discover if fellow researchers feel this work is warranted to develop a systematic means to solve this difficult problem to assist buy in with financial incentives by using a defined unit of measure, the Global Carbon Index, to incentivize or discourage current production.

Scarcity is on the horizon. Where are the major conflicts between food and alcoholic beverages in conjunction with receding agricultural crop production?

Some volcanoes can send particles and water to the Mesosphere, as Tonga in 2022. The consequences are much more complicated than imagined

this paper is talking about it

Which beverages have the lowest carbon footprint per alcoholic intensity?

Including carbon leakage and downstream Scope 3.

How does agricultural impact the environment and modern agricultural practices helpful in reducing crop loss due to climate change?

What is the effect of climate change on agriculture and solutions and can agricultural systems be adapted to reduce the impact of climate change?

Happy for controversial input on the topic of trade under climate change constraints as carbon markets are heterogenous and local.

How does innovation solve climate change and strategies of climate action and role of technology innovation in combating climate change?

As entropies diffuse swiftly around the realm of expanding science and shifting circumstances in the plasma of time, new major risk factors appear. Others lose importance.

What may have been described as exogenous in the past, may have altered its properties significantly. Of the risks which can be measured or assessed qualitatively some may now be better identified and (re)classified.

Happy for novel independent and waning risk factors in the different branches of sciences. In nature speculative based on observations, so an informal Menti would be beneficial.

What methods does the agricultural sector use to adapt to climate change and ways to reduce emissions from agriculture?

How are climate change biodiversity and food security interlinked and do emerging technologies provide an opportunity for crop diversification?

How can we accurately use pollen data to assess the impacts of climate change on ecosystems and biodiversity?