Science topic
Classics - Science topic
Explore the latest questions and answers in Classics, and find Classics experts.
Questions related to Classics
The tunnel effect is not only a quantum mechanical phenomenon but rather a statistical phenomenon which precisely obeys Cairo statistical techniques.
The statistics of Cairo techniques show that quantum tunneling exists and its description formula by the classic Schrödinger PDE is also correct.
The difference is that the description of Cairo techniques is understandable, while Schrödinger's classic PDE is not.
This is indeed the case.
I isolated EVs from iPSC-derived NSC lines using a commercial kit and characterized the Evs for presence of classical EV positive Markers and detected the expression of CD63, TSG101, and Calnexin (ER marker) as a negative marker. However, when I did the BCA protein quantification assay, protein concentrations were very low in EVs, while the house keeping genes; Actin and GAPDH were also not expressed in Evs but present in the parental cell lysates (image attached). Even though there have been inconsistencies in published EV studies on whether the “house keeping genes“ should be present in Evs or not. I would like to know the opinion of experts in this area, thank you.
Isn't quantum teleportation a bit of a con, given that you need to transmit information classical to realise it? You might as well just have transmitted the information classically.
Furthermore, given that you dont know what information has been transmitted, due to the now cloning theorem, how useful is quantum teleportation?
2) How is the formation of the universe?
The universe, at its most fundamental level, appears to operate according to the principles of quantum mechanics, where uncertainty and indeterminacy play key roles in shaping its evolution. In classical computational theory, Turing’s Halting Problem demonstrates that it is impossible to predict whether a system will reach a final state or run indefinitely. This raises profound questions about the nature of the universe: could it, too, one day halt, reaching a state where no further evolution is possible? However, the inherent unpredictability of quantum mechanics—through phenomena like superposition, quantum fluctuations, and entanglement—may offer a safeguard against such a scenario. This paper explores the intersection of quantum mechanics and the Halting Problem, suggesting that quantum uncertainty prevents the universe from settling into a static, final state. By continuously introducing randomness and variation into the fabric of reality, quantum processes ensure the universe remains in perpetual motion, avoiding a halting condition. We will examine the scientific and philosophical implications of this theory and its potential to reshape our understanding of cosmology.
Stam Nicolis added a reply:
The evolution of the universe, from the inflationary epoch onwards, is described by classical, not quantum, gravity.
Stam Nicolis added a reply:
Turing's halting problem doesn't have anything to do with the subject of cosmology, or any subject, where the equations that describe the evolution of the system under study are known.
In particular the answer to the question of the evolution of the universe is known: It's described by the de Sitter solution to Einstein's equations, that is its expansion is accelerating, although with a very slow rate. The question, whose answer isn't, yet, known is what happened before the inflationary epoch. It is for this question that a new theory is needed, that can match to classical description of spacetime and the quantum description of matter that emerged from it.
Stam Nicolis added a reply:
That quantum mechanics provides a probabilistic description isn't particular to it. Classical mechanics, also provides a probabilistic description, since classical systems are, typically, chaotic and integrable systems are the exception, not the rule. The only difference between a quantum system and its classical limit is the space of states.
Dale Fulton added a reply:
Turing's Halting Problem comes from computer sciences and the study of such systems. The question is whether nature obeys any of our "halting" knowledge and our myopic perspective of the universe. Likely not.
Javad Fardaei added a reply:
Dear Abbas We must realize that our universe is a complete entity that it is running billions of galaxies and place billions solar systems in each galaxy in most accurate way is not result of accident big bang, or run mechanically as our past icons (quantum mechanics, or any mechanical entanglement) stated it. Our universe like anything else (inside of it) has born and it has a natural journey. If you accept this fact, then we are in right track as far as knowing intelligent atom, not mechanical atom.
Unfortunately science believes someone imagination of collapsing our mechanical physics into nature (atom)
Reading this unprecedented articles might help your view of this magnificent universe of ours.
1-Article Universe's Rotation and Its Benefit:
2-Article Intelligent Atom:
How did the beliefs and understanding of "ghosts" or unrestful spirits manifesting in an interactive way develop over the course of ancient greek history?
Scientists believe theories must be proven by experiments. Does their faith in the existence of objective reality mean they are classical scientists who reject quantum mechanics' statements that observers and the observed are permanently and inextricably united? In this case, scientists would unavoidably and unconsciously influence every experiment and form of mathematics. In the end, they may be unavoidably and unconsciously influencing the universe which is the home of all experiments and all mathematics.
In quantum cryptographic protocols, participants typically share both a quantum channel and a classical authenticated channel. Authenticated channels ensure that messages come from legitimate senders and have not been tampered with. However, these channels do not inherently protect against the interception or blocking of messages by an adversary. Blocking or delaying messages in the classical channel is considered an active attack.
Many sources, including the first article in quantum key distribution by Bennett and Brassard, mention that the public channel between participants is only susceptible to passive attacks, not active attacks.
My question is: In quantum cryptographic protocols (such as QKD, QSS, and QPC), can an attacker block or delay messages in the public channel without being detected? If so, wouldn't that compromise the security of many well-established protocols such as the BB84?
It's their QI, one need not describe it, because that QI exude's through whole space and it's inexaustable.
They both Classical Chinese Scholars and Qigong Masters.
Meet my Classical Chinese Tutor... No I need not drop names.
Funny, among Chinese, I instantly transform in those Chinese folk art's depiction of a good peasant (one who eats wheat, as my mum would say).
We assume that the conclusions of Einstein theory of general relativity is included in the 4D unit space where the time t is dimension less integer N woven in the 3D geometry of the system the same way as B-mtrix chains do.
These chains are capable to solve special and general relativity as well as classical and quantum physics.
YThese
If you follow the rules of classical logic, it establishes a structure of the universe that produces the results of the MME experiment, and the the observations of GTR and QM in 3-space. I would be curious if anyone can find a flaw in the theory (page 23).
This question invites researchers from different fields—quantum physics and thermodynamics—to explore interdisciplinary connections. By bridging two seemingly unrelated domains, it encourages discussions on novel applications of quantum phenomena to classical systems. This could lead to groundbreaking insights and experimental proposals, attracting a wide audience keen on exploring the frontiers of physics.
We assume that the Laplacian theorem is a combination of Stoke divergence theorem and curl theorem.
Since Div Curl = Nabla^2,then,
d/dt)partial U = D Nabla^2 U +S(U),
Which is equivalent to,
U(x,y,z,t+dt)= B . U(x,y,z,t)
The transition matrix B , valid for classical and quantum physics is subject to,
B + B^2 . . . + B^N = D(N)
And,
E= 1 / ( I - B) = D(N) for N tends to infinity.
We assume that this is true when the statistical matrix mechanics of the so-called Cairo techniques are used to replace PDE and its classical mathematical methods of solution.
Moreover, the statistical transition matrix chains of Cairo techniques are effectively capable of resolving time-dependent phenomena in classical and quantum physics.
Furthermore, the subject of vacuum dynamics can be defined and described with adequate rules considered missing in modern quantum mechanics.
We assume that we can find a statistical matrix mechanics equivalent to Schrödinger's PDE in two consecutive steps:
i-Transform the Schrödinger PDE describing the wave function Ψ into its square describing Ψ^2=Ψ. Ψ*.
Strikingly, the Schrödinger PDE describing Ψ^2, when supplemented by the natural laws of vacuum dynamics, is more complete than the classical Schrödinger PDE itself.
ii-Use the transition-B-matrix statistical chains to find the required equivalence for the PDE of Ψ^2 (in the same way as that for the PDE of thermal diffusion) and therefore its solution for different internal (spontaneous) potentials ) or external.
Note that the well-known Heisenberg matrix mechanics is neither statistical nor complete.
We assume that the cat in a box paradox may allow an additional approach to include multiple cats in the same box.
We can now see two seemingly different views, quantum and classical.
The difference is huge and compares quantum probability to modern statistical probability.
The special session on “Next-Gen Precise Positioning and Seamless Navigation: From Classical Signal Processing to AI” to be held with 3rd International IEEE Applied Sensing Conference (APSCON 2025) during January 20-22, 2025, at IIT Hyderabad, India, invites original submission, not exceeding 4 pages in standard IEEE format, on one of the following topics from the prospective authors.
1) AI, machine/deep learning for intelligent and seamless positioning
2) Hybridization of AI and classical signal processing approaches
3) Intelligent sensor fusion or multiple signal sources for enhanced positioning accuracy
4) Accurate and Efficient positioning: compression, clustering, approximate computing
5) Mobility models for seamless positioning and navigation
6) Case studies and real-world implementations:
Integrated sensing and positioning for autonomous and intelligent vehicles.
Integrated localization and communications for 6G systems
Intelligent in-home monitoring and e-Health
Mobility aid for disabled persons
Navigation solutions for emergency rescue workers
This special session will explore the applicability of artificial intelligence (AI) techniques and their integration in various sensor data fusion including the newly emerged 5G, 6G network data for precise positioning and seamless navigation systems in satellite-signal denied areas. Traditional signal processing methods are increasingly being supplemented or replaced by AI-driven approaches, offering enhanced accuracy, robustness, and efficiency. Topics will cover state-of-the-art AI algorithms, various machine learning models, and deep learning techniques applied to various sensors and data sources to enable the precise positioning and seamless navigation in complex urban environments.
The best 2 papers of this session will be encouraged to submit the extended versions of the papers to the open access journal "IEEE Journal of Indoor and Seamless Positioning and Navigation (J-ISPIN)", and if accepted, the APC will be waived for publication (this is US$ 1995).
The submission deadline is September 20, 2024. To know more about the submission instructions and to submit your paper, kindly check the link mentioned below.
Special Session - IEEE APSCON (ieee-apscon.org).
In the article linked below, a derivation is done using strictly classical logic and experimental results as the premises. Through logic alone, the processes that mimic superposition, quantum tunneling, black holes, etc are derived implying that quantum mechanics is more very classical... I would be curious if there are any mistakes in the derivations of existence, and time.
My impression:
I: The known empirical facts were tried to explain or describe at least by the known logics and/or respective mathematical relations.
II: The obvious logical or empirical contradictions are tried to exceed by the complex mathematical or experimental procedures, just consisting of respective elementary steps.
According to my classical calculations, the whole universe is based on waves.
There is no particle without waves. Even light particles are completely waves.
Waves and matter are always together. Waves create particles. At the same time as the particles are created, other waves are also created inside the new particles. Again, newer particles create newer waves as a result: and this continues until the last particle is created. The smallest particle in creation is the zero point.
Genesis of creation: Now we reverse the story: in the beginning, the whole space is full of zero point with zero mass. But the nature of zero points is different. It will probably be 2 groups or 4 groups in total. They all ride on steady waves. Every moment they turn into a huge mass of zero particles. As these masses move, electric The currents rub against each other and create an electric arc. As a result of the electric arc: the first atoms are created simultaneously with the waves inside them. And these events continue until the largest electric arc occurs between the plates of the gas mass. Every great arc is the beginning of a universe.
As a result: every world revolves around itself. And they all revolve around the greatest electric arc (core of creation).
Hi everyone,
I need help and yuoue experience!!!
What kind of cell culture contamination is it?
Video attached: The cells are lung cancer cells that are thawed from -80°C fridge and we known that are probably alla dead, but we see this strange, non identify object, that move and change shape.
I never seen this kind of bacteria before. I always seen the classical sand contaminaion with torbid medium.
Thank you for any information or suggestions
Valeria
If you examine General Theory of Relativity (GTR), it operates under the premise of a constant speed of light. Similarly, Quantum Mechanics (QM) is built upon the notion of particles existing in multiple states simultaneously. Following the logical pathways from these premises often leads to logically valid conclusions, but the soundness of these conclusions depends on the accuracy of the initial assumptions.
Now, if one were to construct a theory solely on the assumption that classical logic remains consistent, would it necessarily align with all empirical observations? In other words, does soundness imply empirical?
My goal is to consider the possible risks of using AI and the possibility of solving some of these problems using classical ethics. Ethics in relation to AI is usually considered either through human actions: how should we program AI to be ethical. But how can we apply classical ethical approaches to the artificial agent itself if we cannot be completely sure that it will follow the established norms?
1,The image comes from the scientific classic "the propeties of Gases and Liquids"
The picture is a screenshot of the literature: 1. It illustrates the Crabelon equation derived from the second law of thermodynamics: the calculated heat of vaporization does not match the experiment.
2,The more precise the experiment, the more obvious the inconsistency between the second law of thermodynamics and the experiment.
3,Even in the face of such facts, scientists still confidently persist.
4,The second law of thermodynamics does not conform to experiments, and scientists use it to make money is a scam.
The question seems to be whether mathematics is necessary or not, but the question mark is that if mathematics is essential for physics, chemistry and almost all other subjects, then they should change their methods and language to something understandable for teachers of these subjects.
Which makes sense.
Classical mathematical language and formations are redundant, in many cases illogical and contradictory, and they furthermore have the structural appearance of a heroglipic language.
Personally, I and too many of my mathematician and physicist friends find ourselves paralyzed when faced with the simplest mathematical situation.
So what !?
Hi
I am trying to find a good, classical book or review about disturbance ecology.
Any advice would be very helpful.
Thanks in advance!
The article is: H. von Koch, Sur une courbe continue sans tangente, obtenue par une construction geometrique elementaire, Ark. Mat. Astr. Fys., Band 1 (1904) 681{702. Reprinted in English as On a Continuous Curve without Tangent Constructible from Elementary Geometry, Classics on Fractals, G. A. Edgar, Addison-WesleyPublishing (1993)
Tensor computing and quantum computing are two distinct fields with different applications. Tensor networks, such as MPS, PEPS, TTNs, and MERA, have been successfully used in classical machine learning and quantum machine learning, where they can be mapped to quantum computers for improved performance. These tensor networks are efficient for preparing ground states on classical computers and can be combined with quantum processors for tasks like time evolution, which can be intractable on classical computers. On the other hand, quantum computers aim to outperform classical computers in various computational tasks by utilizing the principles of quantum mechanics. Here is a quick comparison between quantum computing and tensor computing:
Quantum Computing:
1- Based on principles of quantum mechanics - uses quantum bits (qubits) that can exist in a superposition of 0 and 1
2- Leverages quantum phenomena like entanglement and interference
3- Can solve certain problems exponentially faster than classical computers (Grover's algorithm, Shor's algorithm, etc)
4- Still in the early stages of development with small-scale quantum computers built
5- Potential applications in cryptography, machine learning, molecular modeling, etc.
Tensor Computing:
1- Based on multidimensional array data structures called tensors
2- Used extensively in deep learning and AI for parameters and dataset representations
3- Leverages tensors for efficient parallel data processing and manipulation
4- Scales well on classical hardware like GPUs through frameworks like TensorFlow
5- Already in use in many machine learning applications like computer vision, NLP, etc.
For more information and details, please see:
the classical Arabic efforts in the field of dictionaries compilation and the modern ones.
What is the Difference between classical and Advanced IPM?
Can we use IPM without Chemical control?
For black holes, researchers are interested in understanding how quantum effects, particularly those associated with Hawking radiation, impact our classical understanding of these gravitational behemoths. Hawking radiation suggests that black holes are not completely black but emit radiation due to quantum processes near the event horizon. Exploring the interplay between quantum phenomena and the classical gravitational framework of black holes is crucial for refining our understanding of their formation, evolution, and ultimate fate.
How do quantum algorithms, such as quantum support vector machines or quantum neural networks, differ from their classical counterparts?
With these stats probably A LOT:
How do quantum algorithms, such as quantum support vector machines or quantum neural networks, differ from their classical counterparts?
The NULL-result of the Michelson-Morley-experiment (MMX) has a theoretical, let’s say geometrical, explanation. You might see it below: If light goes up with 90 degree and comes from that point to the beam splitter.
If the MMX executed here on earth, using visible light with wave length, the ratio of motion (of the earth) w.r.t the light is one into ten thousand: 0.0001. The difference of the x-position that needs to be focused will be two thousands of a nanometer. If you turn the table of the experiment (like Albert Michelson did), the light coming along Fermat's path will vanish because the path length is different by angle.
Hence, the NULL-result of MMX was a very trivial consequence of the setup: The setup works as selector that removes any non-constant path (in terms of length) from the visible fringe-shift result.
Good day,
Please, what are the conditions, steps, rule of thumb and method for calculating the coefficient constant for a control reaching law in a sliding mode control (both classical and super-twisting) for DFIG active and reactive power control?
how can one determine an appropriate coefficient constant that will achieve a good system stability.
Hi,
I'm searching to find as many articles, mostly in form of dissertations and thesises of M.Sc. / M.A. and Phd,
about classic reviews on SEM, and recent reviews on different methods of SEM (Structural Equations Modeling).
Any guidelines and suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
I can measure positions in classical mechanics because my measurements do not disturb the state of the system.
Why measurements cannot be used without perturbation of the system for atomic or subatomic interactions, for example using smaller scale interactions like neutrinos?
Using a standard rt qPCR kit. When looking at non human miRNA species there is a sort of 'background level' of expression in my results when there shouldnt be - i have tried running samples of pbs, Te buffer, RNA storage solution, H20 as a negative control and they all express at around 33 Cts - i have tried opening new RT kit, new qPCR master mix, new assays/primers, new pipettes, changed all equipment, completing in a pcr hood, all new reagents and a different lab ensirely. I use bleach, RNAseaway and ethanol all the time to remove any contamination. Still no change. I dont believe its from contamination at this stage because of how 'stable' every repeat is - I tried a stabiliser also and that is always clear too, which is also evidence it is not contamination going on here. Any sort of buffer seems to express at ct 33 has any one else experienced this? Do i have my threshold wrong on my qPCR machine? is there something going on with the sequence binding? Please help ! any advice appreciated.
The quantum and classical Liouville equations for free particles are identical. So, why is there quantum wave packet spreading; or, conversely, why is there NOT classical wave packet spreading? Please give a clear, mathematical answer, not one couched in vague, philosophical terms. By the Liouville equation, I mean the classical equation d(rho)/dt = -p/2m d(rho)/dq + dV/dq d(rho)/dp (partial derivatives; rho = probability density distribution of p and q), or its quantum equivalent. SEB
The images below show mice fetuses on prenatal day 15. However, I noticed some swellings that looks more translucent in some cases. I want to know if it is a classical abnormality or just sign of growth delay? Thank you for your contributions.
In my thesis, I deal with the changing role of women in mining families during the period of industrialization. In particular, I focus on the Emscher zone in the Ruhr area, Germany. The years 1850 to 1910 represent a temporal limitation. Now I am looking for scientific literature and sources that can support me in my work. I have therefore divided the topic into the following subsections:
- Housework and child rearing
- economic pressure
- Changes through industrialization
- socio-political consequences
If you have any recommendations or tips, I would be very grateful. Please get in touch with me!
Within Artificial Intelligence there is an assumption that it is speeding things up. We are gathering and getting information organized faster than ever before. This shift in how much data and information is able to be gathered is partly because we as humans have sparked an information revolution with the amount of data we are putting online for large tech companies to use. As humans have began to understand what information large tech companies are taking, there has been a decline in trust. Our Question is: How will the increase in Quantum Computing break the encryption methods of classical computing and force a revolution of new device adoption that runs on the rails of the Blockchain with Decentralized Autonomous Organizations providing the structure of the web for people to connect, instead of large tech companies.
Who agrees life is more about preventing tragedies than performing miracles? I welcome elaborations.
We cannot imagine the existence of classical and modern physics without Newton's second law in its general form.
Newton's second law is a hypothesis of universal law that does not need mathematical proof.
It is inherent in almost all theories of physics such as Hamiltonian and Lagrangian mechanics, statistical mechanics, thermodynamics, Einstein's relativity and even the QM Schrödinger equation.
The famous Potential plus Kinetic law of conservation of mechanical energy, inherent in most formulas of QM and classical mechanics, is a form of Newton's law.
We would like to see a rigorous proof of the famous E = m c ^ 2 without Newton's second law. [1].
The unanswered question arises:
Can Schrödinger's PDE replace Newton's law of motion?
1-Quora Q/A, Does Newton's law of motion agree with the special theory of relativity?
Hawking developped these two main insights:
** Bh radiation. Using classic QM he proved bh's radiate, losing mass, something establiished experimental later. Later a young Italian physicist prove his hypothesis further.
** No boundary proposal. He integrated a Riemanian plus later time Minkoskiam spacetime to avoid insoluble early universe cosmologies, in his work with Hurtle. The theory has predictions and is an active area of research i.e
I know a guy who is trying to remove some infinities that present further solutions
I am just GUESSING, NOT ADVOCATING
I have avoid addressing this topic for the obvious reasons that it´s highly sensitive and explosive. But having written about One Country, Two Systems 30 years ago...
what I would say should be treated as simply a time capsule for thinking about this mega-issue 30 years (i.e. 2053, when One Country, Two Systems have already expired in HK) from now...
Since there´s so much at stake for EVERY SIDES, my own perspectiveS are highly tinged by being IndoChinese (where Former South Vietnam does not exist within the Communists´conquest of US Imperialism), plus a decade in HK (1994 to 2003), and now having lived in Germany for many years (where Former Eastern Germany exists within the Triumph of the West).
I have tried to address an inter-related issue here obliquely in a way that confounds ResearchGate´s algorithms and other search engines. This entry is purely for HUMAN EYES:
My own SPECulation is buried here:
Mirror Mirror on the Wall, What Would It Take for China to Take Back Taiwan?
- The PRC would need to go beyond it´s CCP versus KMT Origin Story based on THE LONG MARCH.
- The TAIWAN QUESTION requires a Meta-Narrative that goes beyond the conquest of the PRC over the ROC.
- The TAIWAN QUESTION is really a residue from the COLD WAR, much in the same way that Germany, Vietnam, and Korea were/ are broken into two systems.
- Such a New Meta-Narrative would need to start with Zhou En Lai...
- But better yet, is to overcome the REVULSION/ SELF-HATRED for anything imperial and revisit the narrative(s) of the Middle Kingdom...
What are the REPUBLIC NARRATIVES, be that THE PEOPLE´s REPUBLIC or REPUBLIC of CHINA?
The concept of a "republic" generally refers to a form of government in which the country is considered a "public matter," and political power is derived from the people or their elected representatives. In the context of ancient China, the term "republic" may not be the most accurate descriptor, as the political structures of ancient China were more diverse and often centered around monarchies, dynasties, and imperial rule.
However, if we broaden the scope to include later periods in Chinese history, particularly the 20th century, the idea of a republic becomes more relevant. The Republic of China (ROC) was established in 1912, following the overthrow of the Qing Dynasty and the end of imperial rule. The ROC marked a transition from dynastic monarchy to a more republican form of government. Sun Yat-sen, a key figure in the Xinhai Revolution, played a significant role in advocating for the establishment of a republic in China.
The meta-narrative of the Chinese Republic, particularly during its early years, could include:
- Nationalism: The overthrow of the Qing Dynasty and the establishment of the Republic of China were driven by a strong sense of nationalism. There was a desire to modernize and strengthen the country to counter external threats and regain its standing in the world.
- Modernization: The early leaders of the Republic of China, particularly Sun Yat-sen, sought to modernize the country. This included political, economic, and social reforms to bring China in line with Western powers and other modern nations.
- Struggles for Stability: The early decades of the 20th century in China were marked by internal strife, regional conflicts, and power struggles among different factions. The meta-narrative might involve the challenges of establishing a stable and unified government in the face of internal and external pressures.
- Ideological Shifts: The Republic of China witnessed ideological shifts, including the influence of different political ideologies such as nationalism, democracy, and socialism. These ideological dynamics contributed to the political landscape and struggles for governance.
It's important to note that the history of the Republic of China is complex and includes periods of war, foreign invasions, and internal conflicts, leading eventually to the establishment of the People's Republic of China in 1949. The narrative of the Chinese Republic is multifaceted and reflects the challenges and aspirations of a nation in transition from traditional to modern forms of governance.
What are the IMPERIAL NARRATIVES of the MIDDLE KINGDOM?
The term "Middle Kingdom" is often used to refer to ancient China, specifically during the period of the Zhou Dynasty (1046–256 BCE). However, it's crucial to note that the concept of a "meta-narrative" is a modern analytical framework, and applying it to ancient cultures requires some abstraction.
In the context of ancient China, the idea of a meta-narrative could be approached through the lens of historical and philosophical texts, such as the "Mandate of Heaven." The Mandate of Heaven was a political and religious concept used to legitimize the rule of the kings or emperors in ancient China. According to this idea, a ruler was granted the right to rule by divine approval, but this mandate could be withdrawn if the ruler failed to govern justly and in the best interests of the people.
Confucianism, Daoism, and Legalism are three major philosophical traditions that shaped the meta-narrative of ancient China:
- Confucianism: Emphasizing social harmony, ethical conduct, and filial piety, Confucianism had a profound impact on the political and social structure of ancient China. The meta-narrative here would involve the pursuit of a just and harmonious society through proper governance and moral behavior.
- Daoism (Taoism): Daoism, with its emphasis on the natural order (Dao) and the concept of Wu Wei (non-action), offered an alternative perspective. The meta-narrative could involve living in harmony with the Dao, advocating a more laissez-faire approach to governance and life.
- Legalism: Legalism, on the other hand, focused on strict laws and centralized control to maintain social order. The meta-narrative might revolve around the need for a strong, authoritarian government to prevent chaos and ensure stability.
The meta-narrative of the Middle Kingdom, therefore, could be seen as a complex interplay between these philosophical traditions, the dynamic relationship between rulers and the divine, and the ongoing quest for a balanced and just society.
It's important to approach these concepts with an understanding of the nuances and diversity of thought within ancient Chinese philosophy and not oversimplify the rich tapestry of ideas present in the historical and philosophical texts of the time.
What are MY LINEAGES/ ALLIGANCES?
I AM BOTH MICHAEL HALLIDAY & PIERRE RYCKMANS
Sydney University was their battle ground in terms of how Chinese should be taught. Halliday decamped to Macquarie University but his disciplines REMAINED in Sydney University.
What did Pierre Ryckmans think of June Fourth? Banal. I thought he was callous at the time. But now, I realised he was expressing a world weariness.
I now regret I didnot interview Michael Halliday on the matter.
I am reading the paper of Jeremy Avigad, Edward Dean and John Mumma, entitled "A formal system for Euclid's Elements".
Could this approach be extended to the books of Apollonius of Perga dealing with conics ?
I am interested in complexity questions and the completeness/incompleteness of axiomatic systems for Greek geometry.
Maybe there is more to the late ideas of Frege about basing Arithmetic on Geometry than is generally believed...
Also, inspired by the well-known correspondence between the elementary theory of field extensions and the classical constructions with ruler and compass, one can ask: what kind of field extensions correspond to constructions in which we can draw conics as well as circles and lines ?
We have prepared 14 nm GNPs by using classic citrate synthesis method where trisodium citrate is being used as reducing and stabilising agent. Then we put 6-thioguanine (purine analogue with an S in it (C5H5N5S) at a final concentration of 0.3 mM in these particles by assuming a self assembled monolayer formation of drug onto the surface of GNPs but they immediately turned blue (aggregated).
we are wondering what happened and also what to do to make it work.
I have only read a few papers where classical markers of cholinergic neurons are mentioned but not shown. I want to differentiate SH-SY5Y cells to cholinergic neurons with RA and BDNF.
What would be the best marker to confirm that they are cholinergic neurons? ChAT? HB9 and ISL1?
The choice of coordinate systems is a mathematical tool used to describe physical events. Local or universal spatial events occur in multiple coordinate systems of space and time or spacetime as we know it under classical, relativistic and cosmological physics.
Whether the fundamental laws of physics remains consistent across different coordinate systems.
I am trying to encode a classical image of size 512*512 gray image into the quantum image like NEQR (Novel enhanced quantum image representation), and GQIR (General quantum image representation), but I can't find any method to encode in quantum image by which I can apply quantum operation on quantum image to generate the quantum image encryption algorithm. Can anyone give me some hints about how to encode the classical image into a quantum image? It will be very beneficial for me.
Thanks and regards
South Park may already be a classic because it so popular, the most popular show on Comedy Central, and it has been around since 1997 making it over 23 years old.
Hi all,
I am searching classical Irf8 -/- mice. They have been used for a long time, but Jackson only have them as Cryo-Recovery. I am wondering, if someone here (preferentially from Germany to have an easier transfer) have such mice (Irf8 fl/fl mice would also be nice).
Thank you all in advance!
Christian
Classical derivations of the Lorentz transformations is given using time dilation and length contraction in [LT].
Observers in $F$ and $F'$ (we also switch to $S$ and $S'$ ) obtain the first and the second equation. As observers do not agree on some events (for example about simultaneity, the length of the rod, ...), do we need some explanation to substitute the first equation into the second equation?
Example 1.
Suppose that $S$ and $S'$ in a standard configuration and that origins $O$ and $O'$ coincide at moment $t'=t=0$ and that we have two identical rods of lengths $l'$ an
in $S'$ and $l$ in $S$ respectively. Of course $l=l'$.
(A) Observer in $F$ concludes that $l=\gamma l'$ .
(B) Observer in $F'$ concludes that $l'=\gamma l$.
Here gamma is Lorentz factor.
Hence $l'=\gamma ^2 l$ and therefore $\gamma =1$. Thus if we substitute the first equation into the second equation we get contradiction.
By the example, we wont to illustrate that we can not combine conclusions of observers in $F$ and $F'$ in some situation.
There is also a debate on researchgate [TP-RG].
There are huge literature and In discussion we can cite much more related relevant papers.
[SD]Satadal Datta, A Revisit to Lorentz Transformation without Light, arXiv:2212.03706v1 [physics.class-ph]
[GA] Vasco Guerra and Rodrigo de Abreu, Special Relativity in Absolute Space:
from a contradiction in terms to an obviousness, https://arxiv.org/ftp/physics/papers/0603/0603258.pdf
[Re] D. V. Red\v zi\'c, Direct calculation of length contraction and clock retardation, Serb. Astron. J. No 190 (2015), 49 - 58 UDC 52–334.2
Suppose I have access to a network of weather station that measure many variables in near-real time. I want to produce an interpolated product with temperature, humidity, pressure, etc.
The first (easy) way of doing this would be to use a classical interpolation method : Nearest neighbour, natural neighbour, Inverse weighted distance, Kriging.... All these methods use some a-priori mathematical and statistical knowledge to derive the best approximation of the variable over a grid. However, they all lack physical knowledge.
I would like to do the same but using a lightweight assimilation technique. Instead of using a classical method I'd give an ideal package every information I have in a certain moment (for example not only temperature measured at stations but also satellite measurements, radar measurements, altitude, sondes measurements...) and get back the best physical approximation of the atmosphere at the surface.
This is formulated exactly as a typical NWP assimilation method, but I want to run it with less variables and to get the conditions only at the surface. I know that these methods can be really expensive so I was wondering if there's any way to do this in a lightweight manner, ideally with a Python package. The final goal is to have kind of a synoptic analysis of temperature, humidity, precipitation, etc.
Thanks
in classical and monetarist theories, money supply causes inflation, but, in Keynesian theory, total demand causes inflation.
Quantum computing is a cutting-edge computing paradigm that uses quantum bits or qubits to process information. Unlike classical bits that can only be in a state of 0 or 1, qubits can exist in superposition, enabling multiple computations simultaneously. This fundamental difference allows quantum computers to perform certain tasks exponentially faster than classical computers.