Science topics: Citations
Science topic
Citations - Science topic
Explore the latest questions and answers in Citations, and find Citations experts.
Questions related to Citations
I am looking for a citation specifically in mice that shows how far water-soluble drugs spread at different injection volumes through cannula microinjections in the brain.
Thanks!
I find contradictory citations and have not been able to get my hand on the original article. Does any of the heavy metal folks on this site have a copy of the original article that they can share, or at least check for the correct citation? Thanks.
Dear Researchers,
If there is anyone with an expertise on important topics such as paper mills, image duplication, editorial practices, plagiarism concerns, citation metrics, peer review evaluation issues and so on.
Also, if you are willing to write in this lines, please message me on ResearchGate. I have an undergoing project wherein I need experts from the above mentioned area.
Hi everyone
I am looking for a method to calculate citations from the Google Scholar database excluding the self citations. I can do it if I check each and every publication however it will cost my time. I am searching for some methods to calculate for a group of articles. Any help will be appreciated.
Devraj Chalise
Senior Soil Scientist
Recently I've switched from a windows computer to a mac. For years jabref (https://www.jabref.org/) has been my reference management software. I use the .bib files with LaTeX for the majority of my citations. However, for reports and some documents that use a word template, I have been using docear4word (https://docear.org/software/add-ons/docear4word/download/) which integrates beautifully with MS Word under windows OS.
Docear for word cannot be installed in word for mac, and I've maintained curated .bib databases using jabref for my CV (over 300 entries) and research (approx. 4000 entries).
Does anyone know feasible alternatives -not requiring the quite imperfect export of .bib entries to .xml- of using .bib files with MS Word using macos? I suspect I'm not alone in this pursuit ...
This is the license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
I want to copy exact figures from papers licensed under CC-BY-4.0.
I will give proper credit, in the form of citation/reference to the original source in my paper.
However, issue is that when I look for permission to reuse the figure on the journal website, they do not usually have any option like Elsevier or Springer has at their article sites (maybe because they have already provided full license ?, but I am not sure ?)
But this license code is clearly mentioned over there. Hence, its fine to just download the figure, paste in my document and move forward ?
Best regards,
Mustafa
Hi
I need to make sure of the journal that I want to submit a manuscript is not fake.
I have the journal citation report for 2022 but I need a journal citation report for 2023.
regards
Multiple researchers have cited my articles and which are not been added in the profile yet.
I publised a paper on arxiv, there are some citations to my paper now. But on google scholar, they all link to a wrong title of my paper with '[citation]' . This wrong reference cannot be found only if using the wrong title. (the title is strange that beginning with authors name.) I'm sure the citing papers use the right cites to my paper. How can I correct this?
I am experiencing difficulty putting citations in author-year format. The Template says it uses natbib for author-year citations. However, when I use \citet{ID number}, It shows question mark in front of authors name.
Example:
Recently, a generalised neural network model was proposed by (author?)
[1] for solving partial differential equations
The error is: Package natbib Warning: Author undefined for citation`raissi_physics-informed_2019' on page 2 on input line 134.
My reference:
@article{raissi_physics-informed_2019,
title = {Physics-informed neural networks: {A} deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations},
volume = {378},
issn = {0021-9991},
shorttitle = {Physics-informed neural networks},
doi = {10.1016/j.jcp.2018.10.045},
abstract = {We introduce physics-informed neural networks – neural networks that are trained to solve supervised learning tasks while respecting any given laws of physics described by general nonlinear partial differential equations. In this work, we present our developments in the context of solving two main classes of problems: data-driven solution and data-driven discovery of partial differential equations. Depending on the nature and arrangement of the available data, we devise two distinct types of algorithms, namely continuous time and discrete time models. The first type of models forms a new family of data-efficient spatio-temporal function approximators, while the latter type allows the use of arbitrarily accurate implicit Runge–Kutta time stepping schemes with unlimited number of stages. The effectiveness of the proposed framework is demonstrated through a collection of classical problems in fluids, quantum mechanics, reaction–diffusion systems, and the propagation of nonlinear shallow-water waves.},
language = {en},
urldate = {2022-01-31},
journal = {Journal of Computational Physics},
author = {Raissi, M. and Perdikaris, P. and Karniadakis, G. E.},
month = feb,
year = {2019},
keywords = {Data-driven scientific computing, Machine learning, Nonlinear dynamics, Predictive modeling, Runge–Kutta methods},
pages = {686--707},
file = {ScienceDirect Snapshot:/home/hell/Zotero/storage/62WUGXLX/S0021999118307125.html:text/html},
}
In academic writing, there is a recent call for having collaborators, shared credits and shared writings. This helps in improving the peer reviewed work and also increases the chances of more citations. It also offers higher citeability, higher technical significance, higher impact and better readership. However, do you support single-authored papers or multiple-authored papers?
As an author who has published within both single authored papers and multiple authored papers, I prefer the later. However, some institutions require single authored papers to be considered for promotion from senior lecturers to assistant professorship roles.
Some other places like in Nigerian universities grade the lecturers for promotions based on the number of Q1 and Q2 international journals, and also preferably those where they have less authors (like 2, 3 or 4) - not really single authored papers.
In China, I learnt they score based on the quality of the journals - as high impact journals are preferred, mainly Q1 and Q2 journals, and also if you are the first author, lead author or/and corresponding author.
There are also some experts or scholars with the opinion that multiple-authored papers are of higher quality than single-authored paper, although that position is subject to debate. Do you think that there should be a question of quality consideration for scoring research output?
To me, I would appreciate better collaborators as co-authors, but it is not usually the case. The first authors mostly do about 55-85% of the work in multiple authored papers. Also, my take based on lessons learnt personally is that a single-author paper requires more work from the author, more time, more effort, more responsibility, more research, more writing, hence it is much more work.
Thus, I will support the motion that a single-author article should have a higher score than a multiple-author paper. However, feel free to share your thoughts. Do you support single-authored papers or multiple-authored papers?
There is no obvious link on the website to allow correction of errors by ResearchGate or myself.
Dear RG members,
Let me share the following information.
Once again, RG is providing an inconsistent score.
May 14 2023: Research Interest 690.9; 431 Citations; 396 Recommendations; h-index 11; Mentions 2, 87,111 reads.
May 17 2023: Research Interest 690.6; 430 Citations; 396 Recommendations; h-index 11; Mentions 2, 87,217 reads.
Research Interest and Citations have declined in three days. This does not make sense.
Please let me know if you are facing this kind of inconsistencies.
Best regards
Philippe
I have a paper with around 110 references which were inserted using Mendeley, but now Mendeley is not recognizing the references. I have tried many possible solutions available online like reinstalling Mendeley, restarting the computer, reinstalling MS word. Are there any solutions? Can Zotero or any other tool detect citations inserted by Mendeley?
Revered RG Researchers,
GPT is new becoming popular among the every sections of the users in the world either academic or non-academic side.
It is marvelous technology which helps to users instantly without providing any valid citations like research documents.
Some are saying that the Chat GPT will bring abundant of information with in a second rather it may not bring the authenticated citations like research articles.
Some are still arguing the issue of the Citations.
How for the Artificial Intelligence is helping the new technology miracle
Inline citations help scholars explore and discover prior literature, but it can be challenging to make sense of them and prioritize them during reading.
That’s why researchers from Semantic Scholar created CiteSee, a tool to better interface with citations as you encounter them by providing useful, personalized context.
The CiteSee paper received a Best Paper Award at CHI 2023.
Looking forward to hearing more comments from the RG users.
Regards
Senapathy
Ethiopia
Citations to published scientific studies do not appear on ResearchGate. What is the path to follow to show it?. Thank you.
The significance of the inquiry, "Is it possible to make the citation process equitable for publications written in a language with a smaller readership than other languages?" resides in the requirement for inclusivity and diversity in scholarly research. This query focuses on the difficulties experienced by authors whose works are published in languages with a lesser readership and discusses the problem of language bias in citation practices. It is possible to make sure that worthwhile research is acknowledged and rewarded regardless of the language in which it is published by developing equal citation policies for publications in various languages. It is important for advancing knowledge and tackling difficult problems to foster variety of ideas and viewpoints in academic research, which can be done by addressing language bias in citation procedures.
Dear friends,
scholar google warn me (https://scholar.google.pt/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=pt-BR&user=g3V8bNsAAAAJ&citation_for_view=g3V8bNsAAAAJ:5nxA0vEk-isC)
that an article written by me and colleagues were uploaded in your servers
The problem is that this PDF is an earlier version that was a wrong abstract and keywords.
I've already uploaded the right one already ( )
but on researchgate it still appears both versions, and one is wrong. I cannot delet it, and the problem is that on scholar google is the wrong version that appears. Can you please delete the pdf that has the wrong abstract ?
I'm adding the right version in attach.
Thank you in advance,
The authors
Open Journal of Clinical and Medical Case Reports (ISSN 2379-1039)
Not indexed on PubMed but NLM/PubMed ID: 101658769 (citations only)
It claims Impact Factor: 2.1
Thanks in advance
A year after its publication, our study ("The Caspian Sea and Its Values in Azerbaijan") has not been cited even once. This article contains interesting information about the Caspian Sea and its disappearing ecosystem values. Is it fair to value an article based on citation count?
iam trying to understand if the language is a condition to get a citations for an article or conference paper,
Hi,
I found a few research/articles shared on Research Gate that cited my work but the citation counts did not appear on my stat. How do I add this manually if possible?
I want to pick a published dataset (after giving proper citation and securing copyright also) from one article and after that I want to solve it with different software and compare it with the published results. Is it ethically fine or there is some violation of ethics?
The accessibility and discoverability of a publication may be impacted by the language in which it is written, which may have an impact on how many citations it receives. For instance, publications written in a language other than English might have a smaller potential readership and be less likely to be mentioned by academics who don't speak that language. The visibility and accessibility of non-English articles can be improved by the numerous citation databases and search engines that are built to index publications in multiple languages. Regardless of the language used for publication, the main aspect that will affect a publication's citation rates is the caliber and applicability of the research that is presented in it.
Hi does anyone know how to merge duplicate entries of my own publications in my research profile? ResearchGate has assigned citations to duplications and I would like to merge those without losing the citations, which might be uniquely assigned but actually refer to the same publication.
How can I add missing citations to one of my publications listed in google scholar?
In the context of academic ethics, how does the scholarly community view the intentional omission of citations to previous work based on personal relationships? Furthermore, to what extent can the selection of peer reviewers influence such omissions? Despite the emphasis on scientific rigor, concerns about these issues persist in the academic world.
Your term paper should include all of the following components:
- Give a brief background and explanation regarding the development of the selected topic or theorem. Relate it to topics covered in our course.
- Break the topic into subtopics to simplify the explanation.
- Provide clear and comprehensive details in your own words. Keep the paper interesting with facts, diagrams, graphs, pictures, etc.
- Provide a conclusion of the theorem or topic.
- Include a paragraph on "Learning Outcome/Experience."
- Provide references / citations.
- All diagrams or figures from external sources must be cited.
- Provide a title page.
- Provide a table of contents.
Dear academicians and researchers
We recently wrote a narrative review paper on “ChatGPT and Academic Research: A Review and Recommendations Based on Practical Examples”. Our findings were
- Initial Idea Generation: ChatGPT is an effective tool for idea generation, brainstorming, and outlining research topics.
- Introduction: The authors found that ChatGPT can generate an introduction without a formal problem statement and research gap. Besides, the introduction part is entirely hypothetical, without any references.
- Literature Review: ChatGPT can summarise and compile the literature into a literature review without emphasizing synthesizing and coherence. ChatGPT cannot develop a story based on existing literature. Second, if a researcher instructs ChatGPT to compose a literature review, it generates fictitious and hypothetical in-text citations and references.
To read the full paper: https://journals.cspc.edu.ph/index.php/jemds/article/view/175
We have also proposed some recommendations for academic researchers based on our findings.
Recommendations are attached here.
However, what is your own experience regarding this issue?
I published the following paper with my international colleagues in the Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition (JARMAC) in 2019.
Eyewitness memory distortion following co-witness discussion: A replication of Garry, French, Kinzett, and Mori (2008) in ten countries.
However, JARMAC was transferred from the initial publisher, Elsevier, to the current publisher, APA, in 2022. Then, both publishers list this paper on their sites with different DOIs. Consequently, the researchgate lists it as two separate ones with different citation records. How can I merge them into a single record?
I mean, in articles, everyone refers to the piezoelectric charge constant d31 or the electromechanical coupling factor k33 or the piezoelectric voltage constant g15 and so on, as if it is the most natural notation in piezoelectricity to state the constants in function of the axes, as described here:
In my view, it is not such a trivial notation that one can understand naturally without studying it. However, very rarely is any explanation given about this notation and the vast majority of articles begin to present piezoelectric constants without the slightest clarification of what they refer to. Even review articles! I already saw the notation of d11 and d33 in an article from 1934, therefore not recent at all:
But I cannot find a reference source where the convention of this notation is defined.
In short, I want to write "the coefficient d33 according to the notation by [citation X]." Is there any convention or standard that we can refer to?
Good afternoon.
I want to introduce my self, I am Dede Kosasih from Sundanese Language Education Study Program, FPBS UPI Bandung.
I apologize for permission to submit questions and suggestions, related to a paper that I have uploaded on ResearchGate, entitled Toponimi Masyarakat Sunda and incidentally many have cited it, but it is not integrated (not recorded) on my Google Scholar. I hope the ResearchGate team can help integrate this ResearchGate with Google scholar so that the citations are recorded.
Regards.
e.g. name of the member, number of reads / citations
Dear ladies and gentleman,
One of my publications has more citations than listed in Researchgate. How to give hints that they will be added?
How to add missing citation and missing papers at Scopus?
Manuscript citation purpose via mendeley software
Hello!
I'm preparing a manuscript for a specific portion of a larger research from my ongoing doctoral thesis. I want to cite the ongoing work in this manuscript in Vancouver style. What would be the correct format for the in-text citation and bibliography?
I get notifications from RG that I have new citations, the message invites me to find out more, but going on to RG I cannot find how to access citations of my work, merely a list of my publications.
I have some articles that have cited in online journals however, they do not appear on my cited by on Google scholar.
I would like to know what could be behind this.
Hi. The citation detection system of the authors' publications is really chaotic in RG. For example, in the paper Diagnosis of a family carrying a translocation between chromosomes 5 and 15, 6 citations of my work appear and only two are recognized !!!!.
Please I need to know your experience.
thanks
Luis
Hellow.
I released My Thesis in Theoretical Physics 2 Years ago, last version 7 months ago. Almost 15,000 unique people have downloaded it. Total 34,000 downloads. An amount bigger than the entire Theoretical Physics community. I wonder how is it possible that I have not received not a single mention, in other peer reviewed paper. That is despite solving ,with no doubt, one of the most burning questions in the field by providing a numerical proof.
What kind of people are those who do Theoretical Physics ? They either don't know, which is not likely at that point, March 2023, considering the total download volume. The second option is that they do know that answer was found and they are quite, which is not likely either. What should one do In such Situation ?
Two of my case reports have been 'CITED' in 'Reactions' (a springer journal) under certain drug effects. They are published under subscription basis so the citations are not counted in RG or Google scholar. What is the average embargo period of such articles and if these are never made free to access, will the citations never counted?
Your experience on the matter are much welcome!!!
How to distribute citation weightage of any Research Publications, if there are more than one author according to their sequence of names.
I have seen some researchers who publish 4 to 5 articles per year but only in high impact factor journals (IF > 7.5) as well as many others who publish 20 to 30 articles per year inluding both the Q1, Q2, Q3 and Q4 journals as well as book chapters.
However, I would like to know the metrics on which a scientist is being recognised by his/her university to be qualified to receive grants and to become a Professor?
The responses are welcomed.
Hello,
unfortunately I have been facing problems with Mendeley since I started using it 1,5 years ago... Now I wanted to get back to it once again for a bigger lab report I have to write and I am having the following problem:
I have the Citation Plugin installed in LibreOffice. Whenever I click on "Insert citation" it asks me to run Mendeley Desktop first. I reinstall Mendeley Desktop (have been using Reference Manager eversince), try to log in but the very same Email and password that work perfectly fine when logging in online give me the "PW/username incorrect" error!
Why can I not use it the Plugin with the reference manager? And why would Desktop not let me log in? I really hope to find some help!
Antonia
I love ResearchGate! I think you are doing a wonderful job, and I love getting reports on reads/citations/etc of my articles. I understand why you wanted to discontinue Projects, but that raises a question I had been meaning to ask you for a while now.
Most of my work is computational and I generated new computer code for most of my projects. I am making my code available freely via GitHub. I was wondering if there is any way for me to provide a link to the code associated with my articles on ResearchGate.
In general, I think ResearchGate would be even more useful to scientists if associated information (especially code or data) could be linked to articles on your excellent platform.
Dear managers,
Today I found out that I have one real profile and the second is fake. What should I do?
My real profile is https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Oleg-Kharchenko-2
It matches my Google Academy profile - https://scholar.google.com.ua/citations?user=TKXFLtwAAAAJ&hl=uk&gmla=AJsN-F5tU_-rjJNn1p_LwfJbqYTB10fd_2q1jykcbglYEo9q8QDmBuGEesfdQ6FlHX9IjXCMCIHzwZaKBzKCTYoy4w_1j6VsE71KbQDuN7iWVBmTDiRbXgAxLJasBhiKmj1iNaoqCJMmzf-hN3YosxL6FyLvpoyqjQ&sciund=15489026993401338689
The second profile is fake - https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Oleg-Kharchenko
It almost does not have my articles. Somebody created it recently. What should I do?
With respect, Oleg Kharchenko
Hi there! I've just moved from ENDNOTE previous version to the last one v20. In the previous ones I could insert automatically a reference on while writing on word while being in the integraded mode. You could set this by clicking the icon halfhouse/halfworld, which I canno't find in the new v20; so that if I perform the search online, by PubMed Database and I try to insert the citation while writing I get the following error: There are no references selected in the frontmost EndNote library. To fix this, they say I should work on the integrated mode. How can I set this in v20? Thanks in advance
I do not find this decently sensible in any way. They (RG site persons) imply that they just want to have members go to (or back to) what THEY 'see' as THE major research (so, ALL should be reading just largely out-of context and esoteric published research (or pre-published articles) and, that is all).
Somehow they, apparently, think Projects are needlessly distracting and of lesser value; this outlook will make what is presented by each and every member LIMITED (not to mention boring and with many of the Articles' presentations poorly-founded and esoteric). And, these very poorly based or poorly contextualized studies ARE OFTEN unintelligible as presented in the revered peer-reviewed Articles, no matter how learned a reader may be.. (Citations or multiple citations for just about EVERY sentence, surely does not mean high quality NOR well-integrated OR useful for ANY true science OR for any supposedly developing science.) Researchgate wants to recreate that which is top of mind for many :Psychology pseudo-'scientists' ; publications, publications, publications !! -- peer-reviewed, but often RUINED. And for academics used to or highly rewarded for such, this place (RG), simply stated, will be just what was present before the Internet.
I, myself, in a shortly-upcoming post, will provide everyone a way to my major Projects and ALL the Updates to them. ALL THAT will be available through my OWN DOMAIN AND WEBSITE. (Watch for new post, a post with the needed address information.)
Do researchers have limits to self-citations to have an effect to the h-index level/score?
Why are we finding journal articles that use more and more numbered citation style instead of "Author, year" citation?
This is very annoying as while we read, we need to go back all time to the referencing to see who and when this is said


I am writing a word document, using my Mac. When trying to insert a citation from Mendeley I get a Microsoft message saying "Citation/Bibliography is wrongly placed in index area, please delete the placed citation/bibliography in index area."
What should I do?
Many thanks
Although, whatever chatGTP providing is seem fine for basic information. But its seems not providing proper citation if asked. It is mixing author name, manuscript title, journal name even page number and volume. Please share your opinion if you are using the same.
Recently, i observed that an author has cited a couple of my papers abnormally. my citation count in research gate and google scholar has gone up within few days. When i checked the papers published by the authors, none of the papers are relevant to the cited papers. for example, published papers belong to engineering and sciences and my papers are in management. I am in dilemma, as anyone who looks into my citation will consider as i am faking the citations. Any solutions?
In 1990 in Transfusion I published a paper intitled "doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1990.30290162894.x.. 1990 Feb;30(2):109-13.Transfusion
The gel test: a new way to detect red cell antigen-antibody reactions
Y Lapierre , D Rigal, J Adam, D Josef, F Meyer, S Greber, C Drot.
I would like to know all the paers citing this article.
Thank you
Dr D RIGAL
As we know, there exist a section called Abstracting/Indexing of a particular Journal where you can know whether the Journal is SCI/SCIE/ESCI/SCOPUS etc. But if the mentioned section is not listed there on the Journal home site, how do we know its Abstracting/Indexing? Please let me know if any alternatives are available.
after 81 reads the article ,why i didnot have any citation . what is the diffrence between read and citation ?.how to improve that.
Please do not send me continuously a news about old citations. This year each day I receive an email from you as a new citation on my article, but most of them is not new (2019, 2020 etc.)! It is very disturbing information.
Of course new citations are interesting for me, but most of them is not new and your system has alredy mentioned them earlier! These are not based on new uploaded documents just can be a wrong and disturbing setting.
I quite often receive a wrong citation info as well, articles where nobody citates me, but you write my article is there.
Please try to retake these mistakes. Thanks, Ferenc Kovács
Recently I keep getting citation listings for works I didnt write. I have been confused with Noel Cressie, who wrote Statistics for Spatial data. I did not write this book, although I previously did publish papers with Noel Cressie. Can you please stop sending citation notifications to this work which I didnt write.
Hello Everyone!
I hope you guys are having a fine day.
I am using Mendeley as my reference manager. I prepared a document that had a couple of citations in it. I wanted to copy that paragraph to another doc and generate a bibliography there but the citations are not being detected by Mendeley? Can someone guide me how to resolve this issue?
Thank you
I have heard that Bayesian Networks handle noisy data sets with more accuracy than other machine learning approaches, including improved learning and predictions. Are there any citations that support this?