Chronology - Science topic

To what extent does the need for integrity force the notion not all of us are (or perhaps ever were) from this planet "originally"...

Why do "we" come back? It isn't for the glory, it is for Stored Energy.

Does starting a wave in the name of "humanity" (or any other) guarantee the forbidden FRUIT never reaches beyond the Matrix? For example, Spring "FLOWERS" = Storm Watch Parties when Intelligent Design meets Game Theory?

@Communities of Interest

#Odds of Rebuttal

^Common Denominator Subjects

*Epistemology Separating Chronology

%Fathoming Living "AS"

(Seemantick Fussion: Baseless NLP = Root of small evil)

Hello colleagues! I published an article (a systematic review) and later found out that a very similar article was published by another journal. After reading it and investigating, I realized that many ideas were similar and often verbatim, many of the references were in the same order as mine (no alphabetical or chronological order), and there were many other details that suggested plagiarism. Additionally, there were many references mistakes (it was very messy, info from text was often not in the references, they used info from blogs, etc.). I contacted the journal and explained all the details. The authors were not able to explain how they got to the results, why their results were in the same order, and did not answer some questions asked by the editors. They did not have any methodology to their paper. Also, I was able to prove that they used my results because of some technicalities (measurement units) that the original papers did not have. So, it was pretty obvious that they copied the info from my paper and probably didn't even read the original papers.

Their journal is now issuing a retraction or "corrections" as they call it. They are adding a phrase in the middle of the article saying: "In a previous article by Dr. Fuzimoto, 19 papers were retrieved that investigated the subject... etc...". However, I feel that they are only adding one more citation to their paper, and not really making it clear that the authors used my results to compose part of their paper. As I know there are many editors here, I ask you guys: What is the proper and fair way to do this retraction? Shouldn't the editors be more explicit and say that the authors used my results to compose part of their paper? What do you think should be written in this case? I would appreciate the help... I have no experience with this and I need to talk to the editors. Thank you!

I have completed the age-depth model Using Bacon 2.2 software for radiocarbon age dating, where the calibrated age range (minimum-maximum), mean and median values are only provided. However, there is no uncertainties value are given at the output. I want to add the error bars on the calibrated obtained chronology, as they could be an important factor. How to add error bar to the obtained chronology?

The investigation of astronomical tablet VAT 4956, 13 lunar + 15 planetary observations. Nebuchadnezzar 'year 37' per Seder-Olam -Torah Discovery Chronology is 404 BCE +/- 1 year. I am hoping to get a few perspectives comparing the tablet observations with the sky-charts from 404 BCE. Of the 28 VAT 4956 observations: How many, if any, conflict with 404 BCE?

(If 404 has conflicts please also test years 405 & 403 BCE. ) Assume planet names unknown in case the observed differ w/ the presumed. Assume month one 'Nissan' started in either March or April. As depends when extra month 'leap year' declared.

Please give detail why, if any observation/s conflict, so we can consider if/how able to reconcile.

Thank you, roger m.

1www.caeno.org/pdf/F019_Translation.pdf

2 www.starrynight.com or try: www.ap-i.net/skychart//en/start

Can anyone help me to identify the list of blind schools in India in chronological order?

I am currently working on my MSc research project and have come to a blockade with the statistical analysis. I am looking to see if temperature has an effect on denning chronology (i.e do higher november/december temperatures result in later den entry) and my variables are den entry/exit dates (qualitative) and temperature (quantitative). The data is non-parametric and I am unsure which statistical test to do to determine if there is a relationship. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

I am working in the lake sediment system and I have both radiocarbon and osl ages. In order to build a full chronology of the lake is Bayesian age depth model a good option? If not could you please suggest me the alternatives? Thanking in advance.

Got 3 treatments and would like to see the trend of their effect on several parameters. Data is not normal.

I am a sociolinguist/applied linguist whose part of research focuses on heritage language education. I would like to know details on GCSE/A levels in community languages (number of those who sit those exams, grades and pass rates, which languages, how many boards, chronological changes etc.). Where do I find data on GCSE/A levels in community languages?

Last year we have excavated Dobrogea (South-Eastern Romania) a small flat necropolis or a part from a large one. The dead were buried in flexed position with a lot of ocre. Chronologically (first half of the 3rd mil. BC) there are contemporaneous with the tumular burials of Jamnaja type and there are similar in ritual.

Hello,

I have fire chronologies from different sites across a large region. I would like to cluster these sites and I am on a mission to find the appropriate technique to use. The datasets I have for each site are binary time series (fire/no fire for each year). I found that Fuzzy C-means clustering is used to cluster time series, but the papers I found talking about it mention numerical time series and I have not been able to find how to proceed if the time series is binary. Please, would anyone be able to point me in the right direction?

Could be "Sr isotope chronology" applied to carbonate-rich tuffites?

how to use ice -core oxygen isotope value to establish precise chronology?

I am currently working on my PhD, and need some background information on the shore-line chronologies related to archaeological cultures and sites in the northern Fennoscandia. I would like to ask the community, if any could give some good references on the subject: a) basic works on the shore-line chronologies and archaeology, and b) new research on the same issues in the coast of Norwegian Arctic Ocean (and Varanger Fiord) and in the coastal Kola Peninsula, Barents Sea and also the White Sea.

I am looking for an output style in Endnote to list publications in one's CV. These would have to be be listed in reverese chronological order. Recommendations and opinions welcome.

I need it for comparison with north Iran.

Hello,

In the framework of a broader article on Hellenistic ceramics in Central Asia, I worked on grey-black paste ceramics in order to try to establish connections between Central Asia and the Mediterranean world. One of the objectives was to specify the chronology of their appearance but also to understand if there was a cultural link between this ceramic and the evolution of the colonization of Central Asia during the Seleucid and Greek-Bactrian period. This unpublished work could be an interesting field of work for those who have already had the opportunity to work on the subject in other parts of the Hellenized world. The question is whether this type of pottery corresponds to specific needs, to specific tastes for a particular population.

Thank you for your help.

JBHoual

I'm using LaTex and trying to have citations in chronological order, but want to keep the references ordered alphabetically.

Thanks for your help.

I am only in the beginning phases of this research and could use all the help you are willing to give! If anyone has anything that may be of use to me, be it the oxygen isotope concentrations or articles about Neanderthal breathing habits please send it this way! Thank you!

Hello,

How many authors names can be used in an academic article? Does the chronology of authors name carry any value?

Thanks

This may seem like a simple question, but I have found a case example that is really difficult for me. It is an archival piece from around 1900, when such information was kept by register books or file cards.

Usually customer lists from sales departments or stores are an information tool for marketing and current accounting. The example in the appendix may have had a more special purpose:

Only two categories are displayed: one number (probably the customer number) and the name of each customer. I only found this one piece of paper. The headline shows that it was the first page of a longer list. The paper cut is located on the right hand, i.e there can’t have been further columns and categories on a conceivable adjacent page. So, this listing structure seems to be complete.

What was the purpose of a customer list, if neither the numbers nor the customer names were listed consecutively numerically or alphabetically? And why do some numbers appear twice or three times with different names, but often with the same city?

Apparently this was a list for a specific purpose. How was it worked out? What was the information base?

I have only a vague idea what it might have been. The flow logic of the lines could be chronological, perhaps from the order book of the previous year. Thus, it could have served to compile statistics on the number of active customers. However, I have doubts as to whether this was the usual method for producing such statistics. And if so, the list must have been of limited value as an only intermediate document for the final statistical result. Why did just this composition survive?

Does anyone have any alternative ideas on the case? I would be happy about any ideas, including vague, tentative or hypothetical ones.

many young athletes are among the most outstanding of their disciplines worldwide

From pre-processing to post-processing of Sentinel and Landsat satellite imagery in ArcGis or Idrisi Selva.

Hello! I have an array of data, it is updated: the last element is deleted and the new one is added (the values ​​of the random number generator). The question is that the array "A" is constructed in such a way that the new element is the last A [n], and the old element is the first A [0]. It is updated from right to left. Each time on the new iteration, the old value of A [0] is deleted and the new value is appended to the end of A [n]. Then there is training and so on until the termination of the run-out. Question! How does the array interpret the neural network at the input: 1) it does not matter? Or 2) as a chronological sequence of the set of numbers from the old to the new element and in which direction from left to right \ right to left?. It is important that ANN on a set of numbers predicts the next number ... Rather it is necessary that the network understood where the old element is A [0], and where the new A [n] .. Perl Language. Library AI :: NNFlex

I have tree ring data of a stand until 2006 and dendrometer data from 2000 to 2017. I wish to combine both data sets to a unique chronology to be used in denro-programms like dplr. Waht is the best way to do it? The trees cannot be joined individually.

What is the best way of writing review of related literature? Is it thematic approach? or in chronological order? or from foreign to local? . I know there are different formats but I am just asking what is the best one according to your own perspective?

I have started research on the conflict in yemen, but whilst I digged most of the concrete structures anf the chronology of events, I lack the theory.

Thanks for any answers.

Hi, I am looking for a way to use rhinoceros (a engineering app) to create pottery plates/profiles. Pottery plates/profiles are use in archaeology to establish a relative chronology.

In the NIH format of writing up an experiment, the aim, methods, results, etc. are clear and follow one another in order. This standard of writing is good, but it is not always feasible in the lab where one is working, thinking, and recording constantly.

Should I keep a "rough" lab notebook for day to day use and a "clean" one just for recording experiments? The only problem that I see with this strategy is that the rough notebook is actually more revealing as to the chronological thought process of the scientist and therefore more important than the clean one. I don't know if having dual notebooks is even allowed under NIH guidelines.

I want my notebook to be useful for future readers, but I don't want to painstakingly record while in the midst of an experiment. I want to jot down interesting things without carving them in the stone of my lab notebook.

When we understand dating methods as being based on models (i.e. representations of some portions of reality), we shall ask ourselves whether those models are linear deterministic, non-linear deterministic, stochastic, or hybrid. I am under the impression that often archaeologists expect dating methods to behave in a linear deterministic way, while they most often behave stochastically or in a hybrid way. It looks like this misconception may be particularly problematic when combinig the results of different dating methods (scientific, archaeological, historical) to obtain a general chronological framework for a site or a period. What do you think? Which examples would you provide to illustrate the deterministic, stochastic and/or hybrid models used in archaeological chronometry?

I am currently investigating Okun's Law. As both the dependent and independent variable is I(1)(and hopefully cointegrated), I am going to extend the regular first difference model proposed by Okun to an ECM (I am going to test for Cointegration directly in the ECM). To construct my ECM I start out with an ADL model. I start out with an ADL(4,4) (MaxLag of 4) as I use quarterly data. By using a combination of the AIC and general-to-specific to check for lag significance, I get that I should include the first and the third lag for the dependent variable and only include the second lag for the independent variable and thus skip some lags due to their statistical significance.

Questions:

I am really stuck here and can't seem to find any literature that address' this.

Kind regards,

I am trying to fit ARIMA(p,d,q) model to chronological accidental death data for the period of 50 years in R software. The data set consists of upward trend clearly. So, to achieve stationarity, I did fist difference of the data and plot acf and pacf of the difference data. But there is no significant correlation has been observed in ACF and PACF except one. But while I did stationarity test by ADF test of the differenced data, the result revealed that the differenced data is still non stationarity. My question is that do I go for 2nd difference of the data?

But auto.arima() function in R selects ARIMA(1,1,0) with drift model.

I am endeavouring to reassess some Australian palynostratigraphic zones for the Mesozoic, which no one has done (that I know of) since before the release of the latest geologic time scale (2012). Am I correct in saying that palynostratigraphic zones are determined by their stratigraphic placement in the rock record? So if the timing changes (e.g. the Middle-Late Triassic boundary shift from 229 to 237 Ma), the palynozones would become older like the stratigraphy and not remain where they are relative to the chronologic ages?

Causality in the context of general relativity

pollution chronology related question

It is commonly stated that the prefrontal cortex typically is not fully functional until as late as age 24. If true, this must be an average figure.

If one considers young children that, due to circumstances, are required to act responsibly and independently, far beyond their chronological age, and how they continue through their adulthood to being very responsible and independent.

On the other hand, consider the child who has a "helicopter" mom or other overindulgent caregivers, and how everything is done for them so they often do not act responsibly or independent. This lack of character building then results in an adult who continues acting like a child who is undisciplined, unethical, and irresponsible.

Of course, a middle ground is needed for child development to result in an adult who is well-balanced.

Are my impressions supported by empirical evidence or well-founded theory? Is there a neuroscientific explanation re. the plasticity of the brain?    

When treated with PE, why the tension researches its peak(8-10mN) and drops continually to its initial tension(2-3mN) in DMT620M?

At last U46619-treated mesenteric arteries shows the same situation, why???

The following pictures are the tension in chronological order.

Thank you very much!

Dear Researchers,

We know that Turquoise is one of the last minerals of the system which is mineralized. Is there any appropriate method to date the mineralization of Turquoise directly working on this mineral?

Hello,

I am trying to write a chapter for my thesis about the most important models of economic growth, but somehow I can not figure out how to make a proper classification.

So far, I have this structure:

1. The classical theory of economic growth

a. Adam Smith theories

b. David Ricardo theories

c. Robert Malthus theories

2. Keynes theory of economic growth

3. Post-keynes theories of economic growth

a. Harrod-Domar model

4. Neoclassical theories of economic growth

a. Solow-Swan model

b. Ramsey - Cass - Koopmans model

5. New theories of economic growth (endogenous models)

a. Romer

b. Lucas

I fear that this classification is wrong and that I am not looking at the primary models/theories of economic growth. Can anybody guide me?

Kind regards,

Stefan

Do you believe in portable XRF dating of desert varnish?

Do you think that associated dates for single component sites spatially associated with the rock art are reasonable?

What techniques have you used?

How have you attempted to obtain chronological controls?

I don't seem to be able to find a description of variable selection for chronological clustering. Excluding correlating variables makes a difference in the analysis output and, intuitively, it should... But how to formalize this choice?

I want to carry out research to estimate age using tooth development in the African population however I should compare this to actual age of the individuals. My challenge is there is no birth registration in my country and yet I do not want to depend on reported age. My intended population is 5-27 years. Can anyone help please?

Seriation is a basic technique in archaeology, but recent literature on it's implementation is scarce.

K-Ar dating method sometimes can mislead us, for example Kilauea Iki basalt, Hawaii (A. D. 1959) dating age are 8.5±6.8 Ma (Krummenacher, 1970). But, in practice, how do we assess the reliability and uncertainty of the published K-Ar age data? What aspects should I consider about? Could someone give me some related papers or give me some advice? I just want to use the age data, and not to date the rocks.