Science topic

Catastrophization - Science topic

Catastrophization is a cognitive and emotional processes encompassing magnification of pain-related stimuli, feelings of helplessness, and a generally pessimistic orientation.
Questions related to Catastrophization
  • asked a question related to Catastrophization
Question
1 answer
Parametric curve
Relevant answer
Answer
Not answering your question specifically, it seems that the cusp method of bifucation seems the popular choice of the seven types of catastrophe of René Thom, perhaps due to the fact that it can produce irregular outcomes and sudden ones as prevalent in catastrophe theory, such as by Joseph, J. Jacobson (2020) in ‘Cusp Catastrophe Model of Climate Change - Companion to Basic Global Warming’. The Journal of Business, Economics, Sustainability, Leadership and Innovation, 16th January, 2019(2). Available at: https://besli.pubpub.org/pub/cuspcatastrophe/release/3. Jacobson interestingly applies this as a postulation that reliance on linear prognostication to do with global warming may miss a trick and also suggests that sudden changes could and should be matched by suitable premptive behaviour. Could it be a suggestion that you innovate application of the swallow tail type as regards this vital area of research of global warming/ climate change, where perhaps this has not been done before, perhaps because it might suggest a stable or relatively stable outcome? Just a thought. Good luck.
  • asked a question related to Catastrophization
Question
6 answers
System and Application Software are Obsolete! Sooner or later. Do you agree?
Note: We will address several questions related to this issue.
The Next Question: What is an alternative?
fuse is a standard device found in any electrical system. Examples include a home, an automobile, a power tool, and many more. The fuse is common and comes in a relatively small variant of the required application and the amperage or load the fuse is expected to carry. For a particular application and load, fuses are typically interchangeable. If the FUSE fails, the circuit is open and will not conduct electricity. Plug in a new fuse, and the circuit is complete and resumes operation.
How many software programs are there in the world? Joseph Newcomer, Former Chief Software Architect (1987–2010) and Author have 14.7K replies and 3.7M answer views. Billions. Probably not trillions. But certainly, more than hundreds of millions. Some are one line long. Some are a hundred million lines long. And everything in between.
These software programs have insidious problems, such as:
• Lack of reliability.
• Lack of stability/unstable
• Excessively costly (billions) to build, purchase, and operate.
• Brittle
• Software projects continue to fail at an alarming rate.
This data immediately prompts two questions:
1. Is it a problem with the project methodology or how organizations administer software engineering projects?
2. Is it a problem with the quality of software engineers available within the marketplace?
There is plenty of blame; however, these are not the root causes of the failings of contemporary software applications and software products.
The problems are manifold:
1. Every software solution must be targeted for an operating platform, and invariably, a software engineer or team of engineers must build out not only the functional capabilities of the software but also must deliver the plumbing of the software itself. The multitude of questions must be addressed at the commencement of a software engineering project:
a. How does information move within the application?
b. What algorithms and patterns will be used, and which will be avoided?
c. How do different components interact?
d. Is there a need for a message bus?
e. Will the application employ services?
f. How is information stored, retrieved, rendered, reported, and transmitted to consumers of other details?
g. What are the performance requirements of the application?
h. What is the mechanism for recovering from routine application failures? Or catastrophic failures?
i. How do we prevent the application from suffering from design constraints that effectively lock the application from evolving to meet changing requirements over time?
j. How can we prepare for inevitable changes in requirements and ensure the integrity of the application across many design changes?
Functional and non-functional requirements must be vetted, and a solution that satisfies these questions and many more is needed. Plus, there needs to be a holistic methodology for efficiently documenting a software application's functional and non-functional requirements, neither at its inception nor throughout its lifecycle. Approaches to writing these requirements are as diverse as the number of software architectures today. For example, FUSE employs a holistic approach to software architecture; software design and applications are simply artifacts of the architecture and design.
We could spend hundreds of pages analyzing the many weaknesses of contemporary software engineering practice, but the purpose of our research is different. The compendium of research into the failures of modern software methods is vast, and each new methodology and technique introduced addresses point solutions to only specific problems and weaknesses in software engineering. Unfortunately, no unified and holistic software approach addresses the issues with prior methods.
One may ask, "How so?" or, "How did we get into this desperate situation?
Unfortunately, this specific line of questioning perpetuates the problem and keeps the software engineering community on the wrong track. The question pre-supposes that minor tweaks to how software is engineered are adequate to "fix" the problems that genius software engineers have bequeathed to our world. We cannot just tweak things as has been tried before. We cannot replace zero methodologies with waterfalls to fix how projects are managed. We need to replace waterfall with agile and get a better outcome.
We have made meaningful advances in Software Engineering in the past 50 years. Waterfall methodology was an essential improvement over the diverse approaches used before Waterfall methods were introduced. Object-Oriented Analysis, which led to Object-Oriented Design and Object-Oriented programming, was a similarly crucial step forward. This object orientation motivated the Gang of Four to introduce their notion of systems of patterns, ushering the concepts of patterns into the contemporary world of software engineering. So pervasive was this concept and so widely adopted that it is unlikely to find any software undertaking that does not employ the idea of patterns today.
However, if this is the case, why are the artifacts of software not improving markedly? Why do we still have failures with alarming frequency across all software projects? Shouldn't we expect more from software projects that employ the correct techniques and methods? However, again, this question needs to be corrected. It assumes that we can adjust a small error here or there and solve the fundamental and conceptual problems of software architecture, software design, and software development. There is little more to be done.
Relevant answer
Answer
Being a Computer Science student and a software developer aspirant, I do not agree that System and Application Software will be obsolete soon.
  • asked a question related to Catastrophization
Question
7 answers
The sorting out of the devastating earthquake has catastrophic economic, social and political effects on the Syrian economy and society, which is already suffering from a devastating war for more than 12 years. All of this creates new economic and social behaviors and practices, represented in dependence on aid, theft of aid, trading in aid, chronic unemployment, and runaway inflation. All of the above will produce a new Syrian political economy, I think. The question is, can this case not be called the political economy of the earthquake?
Relevant answer
Answer
yes, earthquakes damages infrastructure and as such the process of rehabilitating and rebuilding requires economic intervention.
  • asked a question related to Catastrophization
Question
6 answers
The amount of medical waste generated from COVID-19 since the outbreak is estimated to be 2.6 million tons/day worldwide and is still growing. Such an amount of medical waste can be also attributable to global mask mandates which are still in force despite the global vaccine rollout. As the Wuhan spike protein-based vaccines have waning efficacy against transmission of new variants, medical mask mandates are still applicable, but there is a need to discuss more focused approach when it comes to medical masks recommendations/mandates in a incidence-dependent manner, meaning that higher the new COVID-19 cases stronger should be the recommendations/mandates, and vice versa, in case of significantly lower incidence of new COVID-19 cases, recommendations/mandates should be relieved. There is also a need for the development of new technologies in medical masks manufacturing towards easily recyclable and biodegradable protective medical equipment, if possible, as well as the need for the improvement of existing technologies for medical waste sanitation. Open scientific debate on the ecological sustainability in the context of COVID-19 pandemic is mandatory.
Relevant answer
Answer
  • asked a question related to Catastrophization
Question
6 answers
The question is basic relation of human mind with war in history
Relevant answer
Answer
Poor strategy.
  • asked a question related to Catastrophization
Question
4 answers
To Everyone out there - thank you for your comments in advance. I welcome all comments and suggestions.
I am involved in a project studying country/region level catastrophe response systems.
To be clear, I need to clarify my use of the term catastrophe.
Insurance companies define disaster and catastrophe differently. There are 2 main contextual differences.
Disasters are predicable and local.
Catastrophes are widespread (regions, country wide) and not predictable.
Disaster Example: Tornadoes in Oklahoma
Catastrophe Example: The 2004 Indian Ocean Tsunami
Our research is trying to codify differences in the context of (for example) widespread floods, fires, hurricanes, cyclones, wind events, chemical spills, earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, etc. impacting a large geographic area.
Catastrophe Response:
Here is our Main Area of Inquiry (let's call this Q1):
In your country, when there is a large scale catastrophe, what international, country or regional Institutions are in control and what is the scope of their control (to what level are they responsible for the response)? Please clarify if they are governmental or public/private organizations. Also, are they local, regional or national? What does it take to elevate a regional catastrophe to receive country level (national) response? To what degree is the response elevated to international response?
Here is our Secondary Area of Inquiry (let's call this Q2):
To what degree are independent, non-governmental or local response organizations involved? (UN, Red Cross, local NGOs). If they are involved, how responsible are they (in a percentage compared to a government agency or military role)? In a catastrophe, to what extent (% response) is left up to local businesses, regional governments, local citizens?
We welcome ALL answers, comments and questions.
Thank you.
MT
Relevant answer
Answer
  • asked a question related to Catastrophization
Question
3 answers
Most of the studies on corporate accountability focus on the legal aspect. I'm looking for studies that focus on the lived experience on the ground and the aftermath. Thank you.
Relevant answer
Answer
I hope the cases developed in my book, "Fighting for Andean Resources", could be helpful (see chapters 3 and 5). Just in case, please note that MUSE allows for institutional access to the ebook: https://muse.jhu.edu/book/75847
  • asked a question related to Catastrophization
Question
10 answers
As we know there are 2 types of errors in hypothesis testing. Type I & type II.
When applied to real life situations, which are more catastrophic ?
Examples would be helpful.
Thanks.
Relevant answer
Answer
Both could be catastrophic. Here are 2 examples:
Type I error: You incorrectly assume that a new expensive cancer treatment is helpful when in fact it is not effective. People may die because they receive the new (ineffective) treatment rather than a treatment that could really help them. Plus you waste a lot of money and time on something that isn't useful.
Type II error: You fail to see that an effective cancer treatment works. People die because they do not receive the treatment.
  • asked a question related to Catastrophization
Question
11 answers
The United Nations says we could have just 12 years left to limit a climate change catastrophe. The climate emergency has resulted from humans putting additional greenhouse gases in our atmosphere. These have heated our planet and at current levels are already a true disaster on a global scale. Unless removed, these gases will result in a level of global warming that will be catastrophic for humanity and much of the world's remaining ecosystems. http://www.caceonline.org/what-is-the-climate-emergency.html
Relevant answer
Answer
Because the life of people and other living organisms on planet Earth in several dozen years will depend on it. What we do in the next decade may determine how large the scale of the climate crisis, which may already occur at the end of the 21st century, may be.
Best regards,
Dariusz Prokopowicz
  • asked a question related to Catastrophization
Question
7 answers
With fast melting ice at poles, we must find alternative ways to conserve our resources and protect our Earth from facing catastrophic consequences
Relevant answer
Answer
The circular economy is one of the ways to reduce the consumption of natural resources and the emission of greenhouse gases (such as carbon dioxide). Some publications below:
  • asked a question related to Catastrophization
Question
4 answers
Flooding and associated loss of life and property has become a norm with several catastrophes in the recent years. I am interested in understanding how scientists and researchers can contribute towards preventive solutions. What sort of research can one pursue to gain skillset that enables better understanding of flooding patterns? Additionally, until we have "concrete" solutions, what can be done to alleviate the severity of the events?
Relevant answer
Answer
Research should be focused on understanding the factors responsible for erratic and excessive rainfall and the city structures - planned or unplanned. Once the factors are known then suitable modeling with GIS and other techniques may be carried out to locate the vulnerable areas of the flooding. The results can be helpful to the city planners to a greater extent. Floods are natural phenomena and with the changing rainfall patterns throughout the globe, floods are likely to occur. Hence, apart from afforestation and eco-friendly urbanization research needs to be carried out for preparedness in the event of floods. The greatest solution to this is multi-criteria modeling and simulations of floods in the cities. So, true research based on appropriate parameters to delineate the vulnerable zones of floods during erratic and excessive rainfall would provide better preventive solutions.
  • asked a question related to Catastrophization
Question
7 answers
Serious infection and SARS from Covid-19 presently has little specific treatment other than ventilator and oxygen, supportive care. We are urgently waiting for vaccination, immune care, antivirals, etc., to be made available for the masses. This was published in JAMA only two days ago, but things are evolving rapidly. Today, I am aware of three new articles, identifying the antiviral properties of chloroquine. I suggest that quinine is an even better agent than chloroquine, in malaria it has less resistance, has been tested and used extensively throughout the world, for more than a century, available ubiquitousl, and is inexpensive. It's safety, side-effects, and contraindications are widely know. It is over-the-counter, versus chloroquine generally requiring a doctor visit and an expensive prescription. Quinine is ubiquitously available as "tonic water" originally as prophylaxis and treatment for malaria. Perhaps this probable prophylactic and therapeutic antiviral agent can prevent the impending catastrophe. One glass of tonic water has about 100mg of quinine, which is a low dose. Not for patients on cardiac medications, side-effects, or complications. Is it time to notify the public that a little tonic water may be considered prudent at this time?
Relevant answer
Answer
  • asked a question related to Catastrophization
Question
3 answers
His disproof of cosmic expansion is a catastrophe for Stockholm, and for the young generation’s trust in their elders. And for the survival chances of humankind.
Sept. 24, 2020
Relevant answer
Answer
Zwicky brightest human being since 1929?
  • asked a question related to Catastrophization
Question
1 answer
water hyacinth has for a long time been a menace in Lake Victoria, Kenya, despite both social and economic efforts being put in place to curb its impact on the region's economy. Should more research and focus therefore be directed to its eradication or rather to maximizing the benefits that may be derived from the hyacinth?
Reference
Guerena, D., Neufeldt, H., Berazneva, J., Duby, S., (2015) Water hyacinth control in Lake Victoria: Transforming an ecological catastrophe into economic, social, and environmental benefits. Sustainable Production and Consumption. VL - 42
DO - 10.1016/j.spc.2015.06.003
Relevant answer
Answer
Harvesting using machines and incorporating in for building sector. Read this paper attached.
  • asked a question related to Catastrophization
Question
5 answers
Wherher 1T mode is only responsible for catastrophe in rocket engines. Whether equal 1L mode will not be similarly dangerous as 1T mode. Is it the case that 1L mode will damp, but 1T doesn't. Whether 1T mode possess the maximum acoustic energy?
Relevant answer
Answer
I think Mr. Pempie's reply is the key. I try to expand more based on what I know. The longitudinal mode is composed of a wave that travels in the same direction of the mean flow in a positive and negative way. For this reason, part of its acoustic energy gets expelled from the main combustion chamber from both the nozzle and the injectors. The latter however can come back after interacting with the other engine parts (feed lines, tanks, turbines) causing the feedback loop closing with the combustion itself. The main point here is that due to the nature of the perturbation, the axial derivative of the velocity: \partial u / \partial x is the one that fluctuates the most. This component is not responsible (or very marginally responsible) for the boundary layer at the walls to be thickened, except at the face plate which, however, is not as thermally overloaded as one might expect due to the fact that low temperature propellants are injected in its vicinity and therefore they have a sort of protective effect from the heat loads. On the other hand transverse modes evolve in a direction that is orthogonal to the main flow and for this reason they excite velocity components that are related to \partial u / \partial y and z, hence directly related to the boundary layer thickness at the walls. These walls now are predominantly wet by combustion products that are hot. Every time that the wall experiences a pressure anti-node (highest value), the boundary layer gets squeezed and the thermal loads increase because the temperature gradients at the wall becomes very large locally (\partial T / \partial y and z). Same holds for the mechanical loads. The injector impedance help to dissipate part of the acoustic energy at each cycle however this portion is larger for a longitudinal mode because it evolves in the same direction of the mean flow. For a transverse mode, some portion of the acoustic energy can go in the injectors too, but in general is less because the wave is orthogonal to the mean flow. As a result, a pressure anti-node for a transverse mode can result in a significantly larger mechanical load than a corresponding longitudinal mode. Putting together the thermal and the mechanical loads, you can see now why the transverse mode is much more dangerous than a longitudinal mode. Hope that this helps.
  • asked a question related to Catastrophization
Question
13 answers
I have questions regarding the report of the vaccine status from one company, that sent the stock price soring yesterday.
1. The report printed in part below stated that the subjects had only mild symptoms, and that all developed antibodies and immune response. But the news last night showed interviews with purported subjects who became so ill from the vaccination that they dropped out of the study. I don't see any of this reported by the company in the news. We have a discrepancy here that needs to be clarified. I really hope this is not the fiasco my vivid imagination can see brewing.
2. Admittedly, there are perhaps hundreds of labs working on COVID-19 vaccines. That being said, the first one to publish, will be making 500 million doses per year. There are 8 billion people to vaccinate. Maybe two doses required? I hope the people realize that this is going to be a long while before the vaccine is distributed and working. We will probably be beyond Phase Three of the viral death curve by then, and unwitting herd immunity if it takes too long.
3. I pray that there are people in that industry who have an influence on the ethics and morals of everything and everyone involved in this endeavor, to do the right thing this time. I pray that the catastrophe has evolved those ethics and morals in this time of need, and especially for future scenarios.
Relevant answer
Answer
November 22, 2020: For various reasons, the population of the USA has a prevalent aversion to current vaccinations. I don't believe this is so in most countries, or at least as bad as in the USA. An article in today's JAMA discusses some of the depressing polls concerning US vaccinations.
"What Is Driving the Decline in People’s Willingness to Take the COVID-19 Vaccine in the United States?
Jarrett Ramos Lewis, BA, MBA
Over the past few months, there has been an indisputable decline in the number of people in the US who say they plan to get the vaccine for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) when one becomes available. A national survey by Pew Research Center in May found that 72% of people in the US said they would get the vaccine if it were available. By September, that number had dropped to 51%. Survey results from CNN showed a similar decline, from 66% who said they would get the vaccine in May to 51% in early October.
What is disputable, however, is why this decline is occurring. The COVID-19 pandemic has become highly politicized, with partisanship affecting attitudes toward wearing a mask and confidence in the accuracy and validity of COVID-19 statistics. Similarly, much has been made about the politicization of the vaccine. And a number of voters believe that politics have influenced the development of the vaccine. A Kaiser Family Foundation survey from early October found that 62% of people in the US are worried that the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will rush to approve a COVID-19 vaccine without making sure that it is safe and effective owing to political pressure from the Trump administration. Moreover, the survey found that 55% of people believe that President Trump is intervening with the FDA’s job of reviewing and approving a COVID-19 vaccine.
But while coverage has primarily pinpointed the driver of the decline to be political in nature, there are a number of other factors at hand. First, people in the US have a history of reluctance to accept new vaccines. Shortly after the polio vaccine was made available in 1954, Gallup found that 60% of people said they would get the newly created vaccine, while 31% said they would not get the vaccine and 9% were not sure. We know how history transpired, with near universal adoption of the polio vaccine in the US today; however, a sizable number of people were hesitant at the outset. Similarly, after the attacks of September 11 elevated concerns of biological attacks on people in the US, including the use of smallpox, Gallup found that 55% of people would get a smallpox vaccine, while 35% would not get the vaccine and 10% were unsure.
Next, attitudes in the US on the importance of vaccines have endured some erosion over the past 20 years (though they are still high). A 2019 Gallup survey found that 84% of people believe it is extremely important that parents get their children vaccinated, down from 94% who said the same in 2001. Similarly, a 2018 Research America/Zogby Analytics national survey found that 70% of people in the US said they believe vaccines are very important to the health of our society, down from 80% who said the same in 2008.
The decline in willingness to get the COVID-19 vaccine might be a result of who people believe are driving decisions on the vaccine itself. A 2016 Pew Research Center survey in the US found that 73% of people believed that medical scientists should have a major role in making decisions about policy issues related to childhood vaccines. Comparatively, just 25% felt that elected officials should have a major role in those decisions. A study published in JAMA Network Open based on a convenience sample collected in July 2020 found that the probability of choosing a COVID-19 vaccine was higher when recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention or the World Health Organization than by President Trump or former Vice President Biden.1
Many people in the US are concerned about the expedited development and trial process. The Kaiser Family Foundation/The Undefeated Survey on Race and Health conducted in September found that 43% of people are not confident that the COVID-19 vaccine will have been properly tested for safety and effectiveness when one becomes available. And despite our desire to return to normalcy, a survey from Pew Research Center in September found that 78% of people in the US are more concerned that the approval of a COVID-19 vaccine will move too fast, compared with 20% who are more concerned that the approval will move too slow. The same survey found that 77% of people believe it is likely that a vaccine will be used before we fully understand whether it is safe and effective.
Black individuals in the US, who have indicated from the early days of the pandemic that they are much less likely to be willing to get the vaccine than White individuals in the US, are highly skeptical about the development of the vaccine. The Kaiser Family Foundation/The Undefeated survey found that 33% of Black individuals are confident that the development of a COVID-19 vaccine is taking the needs of Black people into account, compared with 65% who are not confident.
The decline in willingness to take the vaccine has not been more significant for voters of one party or another. As the Pew Research Center data show, in May, 79% of Democrats and 65% of Republicans said they would get the vaccine. By September, those numbers had dropped to 58% of Democrats and 44% of Republicans, a 21-point drop among voters of both parties.
People in the US are ready to move on from the COVID-19 pandemic, but when it comes to a vaccine, many have a wait-and-see attitude. An October NBC News/Wall Street Journal survey found that just 20% of people in the US say they will get the vaccine as soon as they can, while another 50% plan to wait until the vaccine has been available for a while to see if there are major problems or adverse effects.
The mumps vaccine was the fastest vaccine to be developed, taking 4 years. All signs point to the development of the COVID-19 vaccine shattering that record. The breakneck pace of development is a testament to our innovative medical system and the research and development efforts by pharmaceutical companies and public health agencies. But as we move toward having an approved COVID-19 vaccine, it is important to understand that for many, it will take time to feel comfortable and confident in getting the vaccine. While the politicization of the vaccine is to blame for some of that delay, the increased reluctance of people in the US to get a COVID-19 vaccine runs much deeper than politics."
(This is strictly a business perspective based upon polling data, but presented in a prestigious medical journal. Must I say: "We all know the validity of polling over the past 10 years!" Hopefully, the acceptance rate will be higher than these polls report, or we may have a big problem with 'vaccine mediated herd immunity'. A number I have heard is that we need at least 70% of the population immunized to produce 'vaccine mediated herd immunity.' Fortunately, the effectivity of the recent vaccines is about 95%, otherwise we would need a higher percentage. The thing that we don't know, is how long the vaccine immunity lasts. If it is only a year, this will be a further problem. This future fact, plus the fact that two doses are required, combined with the other myriad of vaccinations now recommended, may result in a new syndrome that I will call "Vaccine Fatigue." Culturally, this may not bode well with the other newly found syndrome, "COVID-19 Fatigue".)
Thank you for your support and stay safe, please. November 22, 2020; Gary Joseph Ordog, MD
  • asked a question related to Catastrophization
Question
6 answers
Could there have been some subtle underlying, seemingly unidentifiable cause of death that combined with the closely related catastrophes (eg asteroid impact hypothesis and/or disruption in animal food chain), these got me thinking because discerning virus effects in geological past is not a common practice in geology as far as I can relate, but I am open to insights from experts in this regard. Thank you
Relevant answer
Answer
2. Later it turned out that such anomalies exist at the boundary of the Eocene-Oligocene, Permian-Triassic, at the boundary of the Famen-Fran in the Late Devonian and early Phanerozoic. All this indicates that the penetration of cosmic bodies into the Earth's atmosphere in the geological past was not a rare event, but probably occurred with a certain frequency and it is usually associated with the vast majority of large extinctions.
The fall of a large cosmic body should leave traces on the earth's surface in the form of an impact crater. It is established that the oldest of the known craters is located in South Africa. It has a diameter of about 140 km and formed about 2 billion. years ago. Sudbury Crater in Canada was 1.84 ± 0.15 billion. years ago. The vast majority of known impact craters are less than 300 million years old. 65 million years ago, on the border of the Mesozoic and Cenozoic, Karsky, Ust-Karsky, Kamensky and Gusevsky (the last two are located on the Black Sea coast) craters with a diameter of 3 to 25 km appeared. The most likely candidate for large craters formed on the Paleogene Cretaceous is now the Chixulub Crater (Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico). Its age exactly corresponds to this boundary, and numerous features - specific minerals and rocks, geochemical anomalies, etc. - confirm the cosmic origin. In addition, among the rocks in which this crater is located, there are sulfates, which could be the cause of the entry into the atmosphere of a significant amount of sulfur dioxide, which is harmful to living organisms. Data were also obtained on the close, if not identical, age of another large crater - Karsky on Pai-Hoi. There is evidence of the existence of such a crater in the Pacific Ocean. It is assumed that the largest crater from the collapsed asteroid is at the bottom of the Barents Sea. There are other views on the problem of extinction.
  • asked a question related to Catastrophization
Question
7 answers
The mechanism of seismoturbidites, produced by catastrophic events, such as a strong earthquakes, is explained in the paper:
Mutti E., Ricci Lucchi F., Séguret M. & Zanzucchi G., 1984. Seismoturbidites: a new group of resedimented deposits. Marine Geol., 55-1/2, 103-116.
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Valentino,
Between your research items exist some very beautiful works... (I have only one work is published official: the planet erosion in Hungarian: Bolygóerrozió, and exist some geological thoughts in gravity theory articles... Others I did not publish, actually, nobody has any interest from them, as a Chinese clothes seller, I have learned well that all only such things have to offer to the clients what they really want, and they make clear visible their interset...
Regards,
Laszlo
  • asked a question related to Catastrophization
Question
1 answer
Organizational trauma may result from a catastrophic event, from repeated wounding, or the deleterious effects of an organization's work. The impacts result in patterns that cause the organization's people and culture to suffer. www.organizationaltraumaandhealing.com
What are your experiences of organizational trauma?
Relevant answer
Answer
Interesting topics.
  • asked a question related to Catastrophization
Question
7 answers
The outbreak of pandemic Covid-19 all over the world has disturbed the political, social, economic, religious and financial structures of the whole world. World’s topmost economies such as the US, China, UK, Germany, France, Italy, Japan and many others are at the verge of collapse. Besides, Stock Markets around the world have been pounded and oil prices have fallen off a cliff. In just a week 3.3 million Americans applied for unemployment and a week later another 6.6 million people started searching for jobs. Also, many experts on economic and financial matters have warned about the worsening condition of global economic and financial structure. Such as Kristalina Georgieva, Managing Director of International Monitory Fund (IMF), explained that “a recession at least as bad as during the Global Financial Crisis or worse”. Moreover, Covid-19 is harming the global economy because the world has been experiencing the most difficult economic situation since World War-II. When it comes to the human cost of the Coronavirus pandemic it is immeasurable therefore all countries need to work together with cooperation and coordination to protect the human beings as well as limit the economic damages. For instance, the lockdown has restricted various businesses such as travelling to contain the virus consequently this business is coming to an abrupt halt globally.
Keeping in a view the staggering situation G-20 nations called an emergency meeting to discuss worsening conditions and prepare a strategy to combat Covid-19 as losses could be reduced. The spread of the epidemic is picking up speed and causing more economic damages. It is stated by the U.S. official from federal reserves that American unemployment would be 30% and its economy would shrink by half. As for as the jobs of common people are concerned, there is also a real threat of losing their jobs because with business shutting down that shows that companies will be unable to pay to workers resultantly they have to lay off them. While when it comes to the stock market, it is severely damaged by Covid-19 such as the stock market of the United States is down about thirty percent. By looking over the existing condition of several businesses, most of the investors are removing its money from multiple businesses in this regard $83 billion has already removed from emerging markets since the outbreak of Covid-19. So, the impact of Covid-19 is severe on the economic structure of the world because people are not spending money resultantly businesses are not getting revenue therefore most of the businesses are shutting up shops.
It also observed that the economic recovery from this fatal disease is only possible by 2021 because it has left severe impacts on the global economy and the countries face multiple difficulties to bring it back in a stable condition. Most of the nations are going through recession and collapse of their economic structure that points out the staggering conditions for them in this regard almost 80 countries have already requested International Monetary Fund (IMF) for financial help. Such as Prime Minister of Pakistan Imran Khan also requested IMF to help Islamabad to fight against Novel Coronavirus. Furthermore, there is uncertainty and unpredictability concerning the spread of Coronavirus. So, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) stated that global growth could be cut in half to 1.5% in 2020 if the virus continues to spread. Most of the economists have already predicted about the recession to happen because there is no surety and still no one knows that how for this pandemic fall and how long the impact would be is still difficult to predict. Besides, Bernard M. Wolf, professor, Economics Schulich School of Business, said that “it is catastrophic and we have never seen anything like this, we have a huge portion of the economy and people under lockdown that’s going to have a huge impact on what can be produced and not produced”.
As Covid-19 has already become a reason for closing the multiple businesses and closure of supermarkets which seems empty nowadays. Therefore, many economists have fear and predicted that the pandemic could lead to inflation. For instance, Bloomberg Economics warns that “full-year GDP growth could fall to zero in a worst-case pandemic scenario”. There are various sectors and economies that seem most vulnerable because of this pandemic, such as, both the demand and supply have been affected by the virus, as a result of depressed activity Foreign Direct Investment flows could fall between 5 to 15 percent. Besides, the most affected sectors have become vulnerable such as tourism and travel-related industries, hotels, restaurants, sports events, consumer electronics, financial markets, transportation, and overload of health systems. Diane Swonk, Chief Economist at the Advisory Firm Grant Thornton, explained that “various nations have multinational companies that operate in the world because the economy is global. For instance, China has touchpoints into every other economy in the world, they are part of the global supply chain. So one should shut down production in the U.S. by shutting down production in China”. Besides, Kristalina Georgieva in a press release suggested that four things need to be done to fight against Covid-19 and avoid or minimize losses. Firstly, continue with essential containment measures and support for the health system. Secondly, shield affected people and firms with large timely targeted fiscal and financial sector measures. Thirdly, reduce stress to the financial system and avoid con tangent. Fourthly, must plan for recovery and must minimize the potential scaring effects of the crisis through policy action. Concerning the serious and worsening conditions all over the world, nations need cooperation and coordination among themselves including the help and mature as well as sensible behaviour of people to effectively fight against Coronavirus. Otherwise, because of the globalized and connected world, wrong actions and policies taken by any state will leave a severe impact on other countries as well. This is not the time of political point-scoring and fight with each other rather it is high time for states to cooperate, coordinate, and help each other to defeat this fatal pandemic first for saving the global economic and financial structure.
  • asked a question related to Catastrophization
Question
3 answers
The gravitational-redshift proportional size increase got overlooked for 113 years: Why?
A catastrophic fact.
March 17, 2020
Relevant answer
Answer
Why 113 exactly?
  • asked a question related to Catastrophization
Question
9 answers
Black swan risks are described as an extreme outlier events that come as a surprise to the observer, and in hindsight, the observer rationalizes that they should have predicted it. Those risks have the maximum impact, but the minimum likelihood, and it's never easy to predict them. How can we draw the line between realistic risk scenarios and those perceived as unrealistic, but nevertheless possible ones, with catastrophic outcomes?
Relevant answer
Answer
Black swans are events that happen once in a long time and in time series data it will be an outlier. Whatever estimates we have will not be accurate because of the outliers which will be averaged out. Perhaps a std deviation analysis will help to take into account outliers like black swans. In scenarios analysis, a deviation of 40-50% have been built into models to take into account crisis. Predicting such events is not within our tools of analysis yet because it happens out of the blue. Most prediction used a trend analysis.
  • asked a question related to Catastrophization
Question
4 answers
If economic theory is about stripping a problem down to its absolute essentials, and deriving meaningful insights from those essentials. Then, how do we reconciled the game of resources allocation?
Relevant answer
Answer
Please clarify the question so that I can understand it
  • asked a question related to Catastrophization
Question
136 answers
Excessive use of fossil fuels has recently (over the last 30 years) revealed itself as a major problem that could have catastrophic consequences, There are many paths to address this problem. The path most traveled recently is to replace fossil fuels with "renewable" fuels like wind, solar or even nuclear. There has also been a large push towards "biofuels" which to many means turning plants that could be food into fuel instead. There are obvious pros and cons with that approach.
Fossil fuels will probably still be around for a long time because no technology has stepped up as a clear successor of fossil fuels. Solar, Wind and Nuclear power have been the leading contenders ease the transition from fossil fuel to for a while now but they do not yet appear to be up to the task. What technologies do you believe are capable of replacing fossil fuels and providing a sustainable future for our planet.?
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Rick Manner:
Advanced research on alternative and green energy is increasing at a faster rate now, but so is climate change.
  • asked a question related to Catastrophization
Question
6 answers
A gramophone gets music or the spoken word back from incised grooves in a disk. The grooves were made by vibrations laid down as sound in matter. Is it possible that Nature left its imprint in matter such as rock and metals (e.g. coins) that could be retrieved as sound from the past? For example, battles, impact of meteors and asteroids in the K/T boundary, 66 million years ago?
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear James and Louis, I know about Wikipedia's text concerning music, Stonehenge and Mexico's pyramid with contributions from 1998-2017. I was more concerned with the enormous noise of an incoming meteor or an asteroid because if this did not leave a measurable soundtrack behind, what do we expect from music and battle noises? So, the question is still up-to-date, I suppose.
  • asked a question related to Catastrophization
Question
3 answers
PGK2.2 is used for CRISPR CAS9 , but it has a catastrophic
transfection efficiency using lipofectamine.
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi again! ok 11kb starts to be big but not so dramatic. What is your problem actually? Is really the delivery the problem or the final editing? What cells do you try to transfect? and which Lipofectamine did you use (2000, 3000, RNAiMAX)? Do you have a control? To get some help, you need to provide some more details. Looking forward to helping you. Best, Sandra
  • asked a question related to Catastrophization
Question
2 answers
A light caustic is the result of light reflected from a curved surface.
The attached images show an example of a coffee cup caustic and its geometry. A coffee cup caustic has two main parts:
cusp: Each of the pointed ends of the crescent of a coffee cup
caustic, formed by light rays making smaller angles on a coffee
surface.
fold caustic: The tails of a coffee cup caustic, formed by light
rays making larger angles on a coffee surface.
Another example of a coffee cup caustic appears in J.F. Nye*.
In general, F.J. Wright** observes that a caustic is the envelope
along which geometrical light rays coalesce.
The coffee cup caustic is an example of what is known as photonic catastrophe.
Photonic catastrophe theory comes into play here in the study of
sudden and dramatic shifts in the behavior of reflected light.
--------------
* Nye, J.: Natural Focusing and Fine Structure of Light. Caustics and Dislocations.
Institute of Physics Publishing, Bristol (1999). xii+328 pp., MR1684422
** Wright, F.: Wavefield singularities: a caustic tale of dislocation
and catastrophe. Ph.D. thesis, University of Bristol,
H.H. Wills Physics Laboratory, Bristol, England (1977).
Relevant answer
Answer
This topic is new to me. My layman's answer is that the light caustic and the photonic catastrophe are the same. The latter probably more sensitive to incident light angles, but the same. I wanted to read about the catastrophe but the link you gave does not work.
Do you like snorkeling? The ever moving and changing light patterns on coral caused by tiny waves of the sea-surface could be labeled caustic, but just as well catastrophe.
  • asked a question related to Catastrophization
Question
9 answers
Two step tensile failure has been observed in welded Al joint. I want to know the significance of two step tensile failure. Is it a type of failure which gives a pre-failure alert and is this failure has some extra advantage over sudden catastrophic failure which usually we see for tensile failure of Al joints. For reference, the image of the fractured zone and the corresponding tensile graph are provided.
Relevant answer
Answer
I think Dr Mikhail Answer is acceptable scientifically. Best regards
  • asked a question related to Catastrophization
Question
3 answers
According to the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) this year’s flu season is more damaging and dangerous than any other since the catastrophic “swine flu” epidemic of 2009.
Relevant answer
Answer
One hundred years ago influenza killed as many as 50 million people, or one out of every 30 human beings on the planet. World Health Organization, the National Academy of Sciences and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, predict influenza pandemics are nearly certain to recur. A pandemic flu virus could emerge anywhere and spread globally.
  • asked a question related to Catastrophization
Question
3 answers
The major apprehension of genetic engineering is that through recombinant DNA experiments , unique micro-organisms or viruses (either inadvertently, or sometimes deliberately for the purpose of war) may be developed that would cause epidemics and environmental catastrophes. Are these fears unfounded? Don't you think the benefits or potential benefits of genetic manipulation outweigh the downsides?
Relevant answer
Answer
Varieties obtained by genetic engineering are as dangerous or safe as varieties created by mating or mutations are, at least this's what scientifics have proved to date. Mostly of genetic modifications used commercially occur in nature and not represent a danger by theyself. The correct management of resources is important to preserve the environment and, at the same time, provide food for human beings. Probably the unequal distribution of food in the world is more dangerous that genetic modification of crops.
  • asked a question related to Catastrophization
Question
3 answers
Hello! I would like to use some VR in my theses which should concentrate on firemen. I would like to ask if somebody know some programs which are for firemen or could be use as simulation of the situations there are in contact with? Meaning like natural catastrophe, fire, floods etc. Thanks in adcance for every lead!
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Tereza
You probably already heard about Flaim Trainer app, which is an Immersive VR combined with a patented haptics feedback system and real equipment that provides a emergency services training experience. In terms of academia research, you might want to read the following:
Cha, Moohyun, Soonhung Han, Jaikyung Lee, and Byungil Choi. "A virtual reality based fire training simulator integrated with fire dynamics data." Fire Safety Journal 50 (2012): 12-24.
Xu, Z., X. Z. Lu, Hong Guan, C. Chen, and A. Z. Ren. "A virtual reality based fire training simulator with smoke hazard assessment capacity." Advances in engineering software 68 (2014): 1-8.
Hope it helps.
Marko
  • asked a question related to Catastrophization
Question
20 answers
Human beings are dependent on one another, that is what makes us as a society. But, can complete dependence on someone be always fruitful or it can be catastrophic?
Your valuable inputs would be appreciated.
Regards
Relevant answer
Answer
Related human groups come to develop a certain degree of dependence, which is positive from the point of view of maintaining the cohesion of the group and adapting to the rules of social coexistence for survival of the species.
When the societies thus formed become very conservative, they are closed to external influences that could be positive to enrich their experiences, experiences, traditions and special ways of life. If these societies remain rigid, then they have to extinction.
There must always be a harmonic balance between Dependency for group cohesion but a certain freedom of thought to make individual decisions for their own benefit and for dependents in a certain area of experience. For example, the dependence of the young children of the parents while they form, grow, mature and form new families. Also in work groups and educational processes.
  • asked a question related to Catastrophization
Question
4 answers
Is solar geoengineering frightening science fiction or bona fide scientific research that someday might provide the tools for staving off catastrophic climate change? Does humanity still have a choice between such extreme and risky schemes and reduction of emission? Are we willing to shoulder the economic burden now, or are we going to wait until we have no alternative to such strategies?
Relevant answer
Answer
"Solar geoengineering could depress crop yields...." C&EN, Aug. 13/20, 2018
  • asked a question related to Catastrophization
Question
3 answers
While analyzing the socio-economic inequality in catastrophic health spending, I have converted my catastrophic health expenditure (CHE) variable into natural log transformation (rather than taking actual CHE) as a dependent variable for decomposition.
I have used following command in STATA 13:
gen logcata10=ln(cata10)
Here cata10 is the catastrophic health spending at 10% threshold.
I have obtained the odds of CHE (incurrence of catastrophic spending at 10% e.g. 16000 households out of say 100000 households), figures which is showing only the number of observations, and is showing 0 mean SD and other estimates.
I am unable to understand where I am doing the mistake.
Any timely help would be really helpful.
Thanks
Regards
Rinshu Dwivedi
Relevant answer
Try nonparametric tests like runs test or rank sum test.
You can also try probit models since 0,1 can be converted into probaility frequencies.
S.K.Mallick
  • asked a question related to Catastrophization
Question
3 answers
Ethics committees get very concerned when a study involves the administration of questionnaires that ask participants to rate their levels of depression, anxiety, etc., or report if they have had some traumatic experiences. Although this concern is justified, I’ve found they tend to anticipate catastrophic scenarios that I have never observed in my clinical experience. Does anyone know of empirical studies that have examined the potential harm questionnaires could cause? Or any study investigating this area in general?
Many thanks
Relevant answer
Answer
Many thanks Beatrice
  • asked a question related to Catastrophization
Question
6 answers

We have normally the 'stress due to 'climat changes'.
And the 'crisis' or catastrophe ?
How and why we are ready to bear the evil to protect our children and not the nature?
Relevant answer
Answer
One of the most compelling reasons for studying environmental science and management is the fact that, in the view of many leading authorities, we are now experiencing an environmental crisis; indeed, many authors have claimed that the present environmental crisis is unprecedented in its magnitude, pace and severity (Park 2001). Awareness of this environmental crisis has grown since the 1970s, partly as a result of the prominence given to major so-called 'environmental' disasters such as the Sahelian droughts of the 1970s and 1980s and the nuclear accident at Chernobyl in 1986. A major assessment of the global environment published in 1999, the UNEP Global Environment Outlook 2000 report (UNEP 1999), drew attention to two critical, recurring themes:
  • the fact that the global human ecosystem is threatened by grave imbalances in productivity and in the distribution of goods and services - as evidenced by the fact that a large proportion of the human population lives in poverty, and that a widening gap exists between those who benefit from economic and technological development and those who do not
  • the fact that accelerating changes are occurring at the global scale, with rates of economic and social development outstripping progress in achieving internationally co-ordinated environmental stewardship - with the result that improvements in environmental protection due to new technologies are being 'cancelled out' by the magnitude and pace of human population growth and economic development
Consequently, a wide range of environmental problems has emerged; those problems include anthropogenic climate change ('global warming'), the depletion of stratospheric ozone (the 'ozone hole'), the acidification of surface waters ('acid rain'), the destruction of tropical forests, the depletion and extinction of species, and the precipitous decline of biodiversity. Yet, while all of these problems have physical (environmental) manifestations, their causes - and their potential solutions - are invariably bound up with human attitudes, beliefs, values, needs, desires, expectations, and behaviours. Thus the symptoms of the environmental crisis cannot be regarded purely as physical problems requiring solutions by environmental 'specialists'; instead, they are intrinsically human problems and they are intimately related to the question of what it means to be human.
Main features of the environmental crisis
At this point, a very brief overview of the environmental crisis may be helpful. It is important to emphasise that a wide range of views about the nature and severity of the current environmental crisis exists, and some of the issues are highly controversial. Nevertheless, there is broad agreement that the environmental crisis encompasses the following main issues.
  • Climate change: anthropogenic climate change due to pollution of the atmosphere by greenhouse gases (and other contaminants) is now regarded as one of the major global environmental issues. It occurs largely as a result of the combustion of fossil fuels, emissions from agriculture and pastoralism, and land-use changes that accompany the destruction, clearance and burning of forests. Climate change already has observable ecological and social effects, and its projected impacts could potentially result in profound changes in global mean surface temperature, sea level, ocean circulation, precipitation patterns, climatic zones, species distributions and ecosystem function.
  • Stratospheric ozone depletion: the depletion of stratospheric ozone due to the pollution of the atmosphere by halocarbons (such as chlorofluorocarbons, or CFCs) is another serious environmental issue. It is a significant concern because the lack of protective ozone at high altitudes results in increased levels of harmful solar ultraviolet (UV-B) radiation reaching the earth's surface, causing a range of health-related and ecological impacts.
  • Degraded air quality: other forms of air pollution are also significant, particularly at regional and local scales, as they may seriously degrade air quality; worldwide, approximately one billion people inhabit areas - mainly industrial cities - where unhealthy levels of air pollution occur. Many air pollutants are responsible for the degradation of air quality, but some key pollutants include particulate matter (such as soot), tropospheric ozone, oxides of nitrogen, oxides of sulphur, lead and various aromatic compounds (such as benzene). Many air pollutants may cause or aggravate respiratory and cardiovascular illnesses; some are known carcinogens; and some can cause damage to vegetation and, in turn, produce a range of ecological effects.
  • Degraded water quality: similarly, water quality can be seriously degraded by contamination with pollutants, giving rise to a range of health-related and ecological effects (such as the degradation of coral reefs). A major source of water pollution is the terrestrial run-off to inshore waters that occurs in many coastal locations; such run-off may contain significantly elevated levels of nitrogen and phosphorus from agricultural land and from human settlements. Many other human activities lead to water pollution, including mining and industrial processes, which may create toxic effluent. Oil spills, accumulation of plastics and the bioaccumulation of persistent organic chemicals are some of the other causes of serious degradation of the marine environment.
  • Scarcity of fresh water: besides the pollution of freshwater sources, there are a variety of other reasons for the scarcity of fresh water for drinking in many parts of the world - many of which are related to poor water resource management practices. For instance, the over-abstraction of water from rivers results in water shortages and problems of salinisation downstream. Irrigation practices may also be responsible for the depletion of local water sources and the salinisation of irrigated land. Vast differences in water security exist at the global scale, reflecting both demand for fresh water and the scale of public and private investment in water supplies, treatment and distribution.
  • Land contamination: land contamination occurs as a result of chemical or radioactive pollution, especially by long-lived (persistent) chemical species that enter the soil. Land contamination may cause profound ecological effects and it presents severe constraints to development, since contaminated land must typically be rehabilitated before it is safe to use for agriculture, construction or recreation.
  • Deforestation: it has been estimated that around half of the world's mature forests have been cleared by humans. Deforestation occurs for a variety of reasons, but the majority of deforestation now occurs when tropical forests are cleared for agriculture and pastoralism; other reasons include the destruction of trees for charcoal production and the selective logging of forests for timber. Whilst tropical forests cover only around 6% of the earth's surface, they are an essential part of the global ecosystem and of the biosphere: they help to regulate climate; they protect soils from erosion; and they provide habitats for a vast number of plant and animal species. One estimate suggests that around 90% of the world's species are found in tropical forests (Park 2001).
  • Soil erosion and degradation: concerns about soil erosion, soil degradation and the problem of desertification have become acute. In part, these concerns are based on the historical experiences of dramatic soil erosion and transport in New World countries including the USA (during the 'Dust Bowl' of the 1930s) and Australia. Whilst analyses of the problems of soil erosion and degradation have become more sophisticated, recently, it is clear that these problems continue to have important consequences for agricultural and pastoral productivity as well as for the functioning of natural ecosystems.
  • Land use change and habitat loss: these issues overlap with others, such as deforestation, but they are broader and include the clearance of forest for agriculture and pastoralism, the transformation of land during urban growth, the development of new infrastructure (such as roads), the drainage of wetlands, and the destruction and removal of coastal mangrove forests. The impact of land use change on forest and grassland environments is depicted in 1.4.1.
  • Biodiversity loss: many plant and animal species are threatened with extinction, due to the spread of disease, the destruction and degradation of their habitats, and direct exploitation. In 1999, UNEP (1999) estimated that one-quarter of the world's mammal species and around one-tenth of the world's bird species faced a significant risk of total extinction. Threats to biodiversity are not confined to terrestrial ecosystems; serious concerns have been raised about the future of marine and coastal wildlife species as a result of the pollution, over-exploitation and acidification of ocean and seas.
  • asked a question related to Catastrophization
Question
1 answer
  • Are we all victims of testosterone? How is the hormone linked to aggression? To hegemonistic tendencies? Can we do something about it?
  • Testosterone-fired and dehumanized men fight and die for a foot of two of desolate land or a piece of tinsel at the battle front, while wives and girlfriends and children and family members pray, weep, and keep flowers on the coffin or the bier. Others like Boko Haram use testosterone-fired rape as a weapon of war. When American troops are involved in rape-murder as in Afghanistan, the US of A swiftly removes them for public eye and into comfort of their own country with the UN and the Hague making appropriate noises.
  • Will we ever rationalize the catastrophe of war? If so, how?
  • The dehumanizing roots of war are not easily apparent but start rotting the core of humans decades before the event, making monsters out of each other ("them" versus "us") by a sustained campaign of largely false vilification, giving us sufficient time to take proactive action. Will we? Or is this all baloney?
  • Are we, then, fated to suffer more wars in future?
  • Is peace the last resort for humans after collapse at the battlefront? Should it be that way?
  • In what ways does the victor further dehumanize the vanquished?
  • Do certain countries like the United States of America thrive on war? Do the coffers of their exchequer swell up with drumming up of war? Is war a business for such countries? Or hegemony? On misery in other countries?
  • Certain countries like the US of A are experts in justifying war, after propping up puppet regimes that are then surprised by the intensity of the American attack and the incomprehension of its complex rhetoric, extending from Plan A to Plan Z.
  • How would Americans feel if an Afghanistan-like force ravaged their own country in a sustained manner over decades with no respite, with better weapons and a crueller streak? Or UK or France or Russia or China?
  • I know of no Indian cricketer who has refused to play Pakistan in convenient third country venues as a conscientious objector to the blatant cross border aggressions and terrorist attacks that spew forth from Pakistan killing both Indian troops and civilians. That is why India is overshadowed by a pip of a country such as Pakistan, that is covertly supported by the US of A. No PIL has ever been filed in the Supreme Court of India to prevent such comi-tragic overtures in India as well in other countries.
  • The Supreme Court of the US of A has never condemned invasion of another country by the US of A. And the justices in the US of A consider themselves enlightened. The power is there but the cowering is all that is evident. No Chief Justice of the apex Court has ever resigned out of moral compunctions on the issue of war involving American troops at the drop of a hat.
  • Nature is the supreme balancer and time is the best reckoner. 2000 years is but a nano hiccup in existence.
  • Countries with extensive coastlines always remain vulnerable to the vagaries of Nature and the machiavellian tendencies of their neighbours.
  • The map of the world was not always what it is now.
  • What goes around, come around in boomerang fashion.
Relevant answer
Answer
It is interesting question. I follow its answers.
Kind regards
  • asked a question related to Catastrophization
Question
8 answers
So we now see the capitalist system recover from the 2008-09 crisis and banks are back ruling the world. We seem more likely to see a catastrophic collapse of the world under the weight on global warming than an effective social regulation of financial capital.
What can be done? Especially in the developing or third world where the impact is most serious?
Relevant answer
Answer
Aalbers, M. (2009) made a comparison of the global effect on an example of US, where the crisis was affecting mostly and on a highest scale the low-income communities while the high-income communities had a possibility to recover from the setback. It is also symbolic for what happened on a global scale. The author in his work also argues the power balance shift which due to rising oil prices has moved towards Asia and predicts (which is already happening and had happened) the increasing importance of some financial centers in Asia, because investing is slowly starting to go both ways and not only from US and Europe elsewhere.
Furthermore, the dynamic movement of capital created a smooth path for the crisis development. All industrialized countries were seeking for new markets, especially for cheap production inputs and the FDI enlarged exponentially on the global level in the last two and a half decades. Moreover, many economic analysts argue that global increase in debts was an additional factor for creating the crisis. All countries in development process were facing huge budget deficits and they also were trying to grow their economy and infrastructure.
  • asked a question related to Catastrophization
Question
3 answers
When a BMG sample is subjected to a tensile test, the sample deforms elastically with a maximum elastic straks and then fractures catastrophically .
Relevant answer
Answer
Dr. Patel:
Ductility is a function of plasticity and plasticity in bulk-metallic glasses (BMGs) is associated with the creation of multiple shear bands throughout the sample. There is a subtlety here though as one unchecked single shear band can tranverse a sample and lead to near zero tensile ductilities (which you describe in your question). And so one approach to creating much larger strains to failure is to arrest shear bands before they become long enough to exceed the critical crack size and lead to catastrophic fracture. This can be achieved by adding a second phase to the metallic glass matrix to locally arrest shear bands before they get too long and to encourage further shear bands to form. This is the basis of bulk-metallic glass composites which, along with the characteristic high strength of BMGs, can display good ductilities and spectacular fracture toughness values. So in this context, adding alloying elements will enhance ductility in BMGs. (Hofmann et al., Nature 2008).
For monolithic BMGs, a different approach must be used to encourage multiple shear band formation, but again it can be achieved by adding the right alloying elements. One initial and highly successful approach has been to develop alloys with a high bulk to shear modulus (B/G) ratio - the low shear modulus promotes easier shear band formation whereas the high bulk modulus inhibits the cavitation (opening) of these shear bands to cause cracks. This approach has been used with a Pd-based glass to create, I believe, is still the highest toughness BMG ever - although the material is not very practical as it contains Pd which is prohibitively expensive! (Demetriou et al., Nature Materials 2011)
More recent theoretical studies have shown though that shear band formation can be assoicated with local regions of unstable short-range order (termed GUMs - geometrically unstable motifs) in the amorphous state. (Note that they have been theoretically predicted but experimental characterization and quantification is still lacking - Ding et al., PMAS 2014). Again these GUMs can be created by composition (adding specific alloying elements) or by rapid quenching and so forth, but this appears to be the fundamental source of ductility in BMGs.
ROR
  • asked a question related to Catastrophization
Question
3 answers
During the 2017 edition of the World Science Forum Conference ( www.worldscienceforum.org) held at King Hussein convention centre, Dead Sea- Jordan 7-11 Nov. 2017 much emphases were put on the resilience and recovery issues after major disaters, I wanted to see more emphases on prevention agaist disasters, besides, man-quakes are more destructive than earthquakes, what is resilience in the case of a nuclrar holocaust ? whether accidental or or intentional? , knowing that every minute that passes brings humanity closer to this type of mega catastrophe, dont you think that we should focus on working towards a better informed World as a mean of prevention? So that no deceptive monopoly of media is possible.
Relevant answer
Answer
What does the media have to do with nuclear weapons? Those who push the button in the end are not really dependend from media. And you as the onlooker do not have control over the button. It is for sure not the media that creates an event, but they justify action for or against it to the masses, don't they? And beside that: Do you know how many security gates nuclear weapons do have? You can for sure not say that pushing the button would happen 'unintentinally' or 'by accident'. No. It is a well made decision following a row of tactical considerations, even if it is based on madness. And then again: What's madness here? You call something madness because from your point of view as a social being you are trained to think in the realms of 'humanism'. Others who are in charge to push the button may not have adopted that thinking. And what's the real madness here then? The real madness is to give such subjects who are dangerous for society power to make those decissions for many others. But isn't that the case in so many cases when it comes to humanity? That the mass empowers the mad guys who literally give a shit?
Why is that so? Because they are 'more skilled'? No. I tell you why this is so: Because you are sheeps ruled by wolves. And as sheeps you have learned to be more social and show more compassion and put others before you. And you do not understand how they abuse your skills and qualities. Then they give you little space to do your sheep thing. But for their sake only if it helps them! And then you feel a little bit like receiving some consideration. And while climbing up their shitty ladders you all the sudden see: Hey... something really stinks here! Some things are not like they should be. But even then they have already brainwashed you on your way up, that you are so stupid and blind, little blind fools, that you learned to go the way of the wicked.
"We want to prevent!". Prevent what? Prevent them from being ruthless assholes that make antisocial decisions while you still give them access to the button? How? With words? Do you even think they are open for your words? Do you even think you are heard? How well did that work when it came to Nagasaki?
In first place it should have already rang a bell when they invented 'the button'. But as sheeps you believe it it good for you. And now you are facing your own destruction and you start to wake up, rubbing your eyes and saying: "I cannot believe what I see.". But even then you rather choose to circumscirbe the situation. Let's not go too far here. Someone might loose their reputation by finding clear words.
Be realistic: A massmurder once in charge cannot be stopped by words. We gave power into the wrong hands by closing our eyes for too long and thinking that writing about it or demonstrating might make a change.
"We first need to analyse and describe the problem. Please, make a coffee. We need much coffee, because we need much talking now. Yes, we need to understand their point of view first and research it until we come to a feeling it is good.".
When will you wake up and face the situation you are in? When will you see that 'research' and 'science' is in such cases not sufficient and understand that their logic and rationality is different from yours? Yes, you have empathy for each and every being. But they have not. And that is the only difference you have to make here and see that for some strange reason those with empathy are not in charge. Just open your eyes and see how some people are not implicit blessed with the same qualities. And then ask yourself how it could happen that they are in charge while others with different qualities are not.
Then you will come to the conclusion too that they are in charge of the media and that is what spoils others too. Not vice versa. It is not the media that makes the war. They make the war. And they make you love it.
  • asked a question related to Catastrophization
Question
4 answers
In the coming years, communities across the United States will face the catastrophic effects of tornadoes due to a contribution of several factors.  Climate change will alter the coverage, frequency, and intensity of said events.  Tornadoes most frequently occur across the Midwestern and Southeastern United States, and these regions have seen rapid urbanization and an increasing number of large population centers.  These factors combine to put more communities at risk of being impacted by large, damaging tornadoes.  While devastating, these events provide an opportunity for redeveloping in a manner that reduces future risk.
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Tristan, this article could shed some light into the topic: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1758-5899.12038/abstract
  • asked a question related to Catastrophization
Question
61 answers
 We are all very familiar with the concept of anthropogenic climate change, usually expressed in its negative to potentially catastrophic terms.
What is less frequently discussed is that pre-industrial levels of C02 had dropped to dangerously low levels. Low levels of atmospheric C02 pose a number of dangers to life on Earth, not only by the loss of the positive aspects of the greenhouse effect and to the ability of plant life to flourish, but in the evolution of alternative photosynthetic processes that have materially affected our abilities to grow food crops.
Did burning fossil fuels over the last 1000 years actually have a positive effect as well as the negative ones we are so frequently reminded of?
Relevant answer
Answer
We were already set up for extinction, its a consequence of evolution
  • asked a question related to Catastrophization
Question
15 answers
Many years ago I recall a paper in a high-impact journal (probably Nature, maybe Science) predicting the future of the human species. The argument, as I recall it (and this may be faulty) was that the population curve of the human race was an exponential increase up to a catastrophic threshold, after which it would collapse to a stone-age level again, stay like that for ~1 million years, and we would then become extinct. As the time before the crash is when most humans would be alive at any one time on the planet (a variation of the old argument that X% of humans that have ever lived are alive today), the probability is that we are now living in that time, and hence we can expect a complete collapse of the human race in 50 - 500 years. This I read sometime between 1988 and 1992 I think, so at this distance in time I may have many of the arguments wrong. With that caveat, does anyone recall this paper??
Relevant answer
Answer
You may be thinking of the 1968 book "The Population Bomb" by Paul Erhlich, which predicted food shortages and collapse. Perhaps it was just a rehash of this idea? Pew recently did a nice compilation for forecast. Soylent Green in people, it's people! :-) A more recent upbeat take on this came out by Fred Pearce in 2010 with his book "The Coming Population Crash: and Our Planet's Surprising Future ", but I don't recall an actual article in the peer reviewed literature.  There was one in Science recently, but not predicting doom. Hope this helps!
  • asked a question related to Catastrophization
Question
1 answer
In relation to finding mechanisms of pain catastrophizing in healthy humans and what it will likely be when HPA axis is disrupted by disease.
Relevant answer
Answer
first of all, their are many studies regarding PCS in relation to experimental pain sensetivity.
second, HPA axis disruption will be likely be only in a disease state, but it can only influence pain sensitivity and not PCS because catastrophization is a trait and it cant be changed by hormonal changes.
  • asked a question related to Catastrophization
Question
3 answers
I am aware of works on large scale social disorganization brought about by environmental crises, such as in the cases of Teotihuacan in Mexico and the fall of the Maya empire in Yucatán. But I am interested in cases where people were able to predict major change and prepare for it, not relying on modern technological prediction apparatuses. 
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi Renzo - if you research the periodic floods that sweep Egypt (pre - modern day) you may find references to temple scribes who gauged the severity of future flooding by annual river height variation - hope this helps :)
  • asked a question related to Catastrophization
Question
7 answers
I am trying to formulate decision rules for capturing and segregating near miss catastrophic events in a risk management system. I would like suggestions on how to segregate near miss into robust system or intervention driven .
How can one design a mechanism to analyse this? Is there any research work on this?
Thank you
Relevant answer
Answer
A broader issue is how to interpret near-miss events.
If you know (or think you know) what percentage of potentially dangerous behaviors end in a near-miss and what percentage end in a serious accident, then an an increase in the number of near-misses is a warning: the more near-misses, the higher the probability of a serious accident.  "We almost exploded the tank!"
But if you don't know that, then a near-miss can be seen as evidence that a serious accident is unlikely.  "We've 'almost exploded the tank' hundreds of times and yet the tank has never exploded.  Defense-in-depth must be working.  Those 'near-misses' aren't so near after all!"
This is a fundamental problem in talking to people about near-misses.  What is intended by the communicator as a warning can easily be seen as reassuring by the audience.