Science topic
Bullying - Science topic
Bullying is an aggressive behavior intended to cause harm or distress. The behavior may be physical or verbal. There is typically an imbalance of power, strength, or status between the target and the aggressor.
Questions related to Bullying
Bullying on high school students.
A discussion on the death of a student who is bullied and beat until he was nearly dead and died two days later, makes sense. The Clark county School district i
s rampant with bullying and it starts with the administrations funneling down through the teachers and to the students.
"Gender Role in School Bullying" has 10 citations in GS but 22 in RG.
Dear fellow researchers,
I am an independent researcher seeking constructive feedback on a paper I recently submitted to a journal. After submission, I received a request for major revisions, which has left me somewhat perplexed and wondering if there might be some misunderstandings.
For your convenience, here's the abstract of paper and its preprint link:
Two Types of Resources: Non-Replicable Material and Replicable Information, and Their Different Distribution in Society
Abstract
Resources are typically discussed in economics as factors of production. This article proposes defining resources from the perspective of human needs, thereby dividing resources into two categories: material resources and information resources. The key distinction lies in whether they can be replicated, which determines if their marginal cost of supply is zero, and leads to their different distribution in society.
For material resources, the main indicator is wealth, and the distribution of wealth follows a power law. This means that a small minority of people control a large amount of wealth, leading to severe inequality issues. This led to Karl Marx's idea of abolishing private property, which ultimately failed.
For information resources, the article suggests that reputation can serve as a main indicator for observation and proposes an algorithm for calculating reputation scores. The article points out that the distribution of reputation scores does not follow a power law, contrary to wealth distribution, and results in a multi-centered, star-like social structure. A star chart model is introduced to visualize this structure, illustrating the roles of creators, reflectors, and recipients in information dissemination. Thus, the social structure resulting from information activities has a relatively low level of inequality. Furthermore, the modern information infrastructure has lowered barriers to knowledge acquisition and reputation building, potentially mitigating wealth inequality by providing new income channels. It also addresses challenges in the digital age, such as cyberbullying and misinformation, proposing principles for effective governance of online spaces.
I would be incredibly grateful if researchers with backgrounds in Society, and/or Economics could take a look at my paper and provide their thoughts. I'm particularly interested in your opinions on:
1. The overall narrative structure of the paper
2. The clarity and relevance of the main themes
3. The coherence of the arguments presented
4. Any areas that you feel might need further elaboration or clarification
Your insights would be invaluable in helping me address the reviewers' concerns and improve the overall quality of the paper. I'm open to all constructive criticism and suggestions.
If you're willing to help, please comment below or send me a private message. I can then share more details about the paper and the specific feedback I received.
Thank you in advance for your time and expertise. Your help would be greatly appreciated in this challenging phase of the publication process.
Best regards,
Zhang
- Is it the bullies fault? Or are they inherently needed in society in some shape or form? Is it the genetics of this person? is it the fact that she or he might give up and let themselves go? or do you think it is the fact that bad experiences, inevitable will lead to horrid internal thorugh processes and storms, which ofc course (if that is the case, without help.) wrosen the external behaviour...
- Do you think a popular person, girl or boy, should step in when this downwards spiral is clearly at it's beginning?
I want to analyze the relationship between a student's experience of bullying and other variables using regression, the Process macro, or SEM.
1. Should I recruit both students who have experienced bullying and those who have not, or should I only recruit students who have experienced bullying?
2. If I need to recruit students who have not experienced bullying, should I control for the proportion of students who have and have not experienced bullying? I know that in regression analysis, the assumption is normal distribution for variable, but if I have a higher number of students who have not experienced bullying(Which will be coded as 0), won't the distribution be skewed instead of normal?
I need a copy of the research titled “An Efficient Automated Multi-Modal Cyberbullying Detection Using Decision Fusion Classifier on Social Media Platforms"
So I am doing my thesis on the relation between cyberbullying perpetration and life satisfaction and if physical activity is a moderator. But in my moderation analysis the interaction is non-significant but the conditional effects are all significant. Is physical activity a moderator? or not? And why yes or no?
role do parents and educators play in preventing and addressing bullying
psychological and emotional impacts of bullying on children
Like with all professions, interpersonal dynamics are crucial, though arguably it matters more for some fields and at some places more than others. For example, you really need reasonable interpersonal skills if you want to run a lab or research group properly - but you would need it even if you were more of traditional solo humanities scholar who always publishes alone, since you need to work with your colleagues to agree on teaching and governance as well as with non-academic staff for administration of the department, managing grants, organizing conferences, etc. Like with every profession, some people are better at this than others: so many young scholars leave academia because of awful senior people who are just bad managers, bullies, or only interested in growing their own power, but there have recently been high-profile cases (in the UK) where the bullies have faced consequences so there may be hope yet. The general rule of 'be a good person' should be followed.
Dear colleagues. I would like to make a big request from you. Do you know of any questionnaire on sociocultural differences in children in early adolescence? It is that we are preparing research on bullying with colleagues from Slovakia and Georgia (Asia). I am currently in Georgia and I have noticed significant differences in the behaviour of Georgian children compared to our Czech children. However, I do not know if this is just my impression. Thank you very much for any helpful ideas.
What promotes workplace bullying and how does it affect employees and how can an organization deal with it
Specifically, I am currently doing my research on the impact of school bullying on the level of self-esteem and subjective happiness in adulthood. Thank you in advance for any help. :)
There is a fine line between what might be considered bullying, and what might be considered a boss doing their job and acting in line with management instructions.
This fine line seems to be blur when it comes to identifying which is which?
Do you have any experiences that you can share here.
All the best.
Thanks and regards
Stay safe and take care
I am doing a project - comaprison of ethnic minority and majority mental health in terms of their past experiences of racism, discrimination and bullying.
Im unsure what descriptives I need and don’t, what sort of statistical analysis ill be conducting. As well as if my project is a 2x3 or 2x4 repeated measures design, unsure?
Determine the appropriate method for selecting a sample to study the issue of cyberbullying
hello everyone, I am looking for resources for research about the psychological effect of cyber bullying ,especially on the personality of adolescents and /or elementary schoolchildren? Any help or recommendations will be a great help. Thanks
Any research about corellation between school bullying and addiction behavior?
Hello all. I have a research study proposal that examines a database of mass shooters (the Violence Project) where I want to do a comparison test regarding which group is more likely to commit a mass shooting, those that experienced strain prior to the shooting (5 categories: trauma, abused, bullied, employment trouble, parental suicide) , or those with past criminal records (4 categories: criminal record, history of violence, domestic abuse, history of sex offenses).
Which statistical test should I use to compare the two groups? Thank you in advance.
Silent bullying.....
Many of the articles, shared here on Researchgate, link bullying to violence and aggression.
But bullying can be non-aggressive and non-violent. Are we ignoring/leaving out work on silent and quiet bullying?
What do you think?
Constructive discharge is a legal term used to describe a situation where an employee decides to resign or leave their job voluntarily due to intolerable working conditions or a hostile environment. In such cases, the working conditions are so difficult or adverse that it is as if the employer has forced the employee to quit. Although the term "constructive discharge" implies a voluntary resignation, it is considered involuntary in a legal sense because the working conditions essentially compelled the employee to leave.
In the context of academics, constructive discharge can occur when faculty members or researchers decide to leave their academic positions due to factors such as:
- Hostile Work Environment: Persistent harassment, discrimination, or unfair treatment based on gender, race, ethnicity, or other protected characteristics can create a hostile work environment that pushes academics to resign.
- Lack of Support: Inadequate support from the institution or colleagues, such as limited resources, lack of mentorship, or insufficient opportunities for professional development, can lead academics to feel frustrated and unsupported.
- Excessive Workload: Overburdening academics with heavy teaching loads, administrative tasks, and research responsibilities without adequate compensation or time can lead to burnout and the decision to leave.
- Unclear Expectations or Inconsistent Policies: If the institution has ambiguous or ever-changing expectations, it can create a stressful environment for academics who struggle to meet unclear standards.
- Toxic Leadership: Poor leadership at the institutional level, including micromanagement, favoritism, or lack of transparency, can create a negative work environment and drive academics to seek employment elsewhere.
- Bullying or Professional Intimidation: Instances of bullying or intimidation from colleagues or superiors can create an untenable situation for academics, leading to their decision to resign.
- Salary and Benefits Issues: If academics feel their compensation or benefits are inadequate compared to their workload or industry standards, it may contribute to their decision to leave.
- Restrictive Research Environment: Institutions that impose significant constraints on research topics or methodologies may discourage academics seeking intellectual freedom.
In academics, constructive discharge can have detrimental effects on individuals and institutions. Losing talented faculty members or researchers can lead to a loss of expertise and hinder the institution's academic reputation. It can also have broader implications for the academic community and the pursuit of knowledge.
If academics believe they are facing a situation of constructive discharge, they may consider seeking legal advice or support from human resources to address the issues and protect their rights. Additionally, addressing the underlying problems and fostering a supportive and inclusive work environment can help prevent constructive discharge and create a positive academic environment for all members.
Explica y opina si solo con la ayuda de la escuela se puede abolir el bullying y la violencia.
The 'scientific' research methodology fails to lead to solutions to real-world 'wicked' social problems. We have a plethora of literature reviews discussing toxic leadership and bullying yet do any of these reveal the truth?
In an attempt to undertake human behaviour research into workplace bullying and harassment, a myriad of real-world issues were faced ultimately resulting in a failure to report the truth of what the research found.
Irrespective of how sound the research methodology started off, the end result propagated a lie. Is this why we fail to solve 'wicked' problems?
Human behaviour research into real-world problems need to be designed to accommodate real-world issues. Where toxic leaders taint the research, researchers must find a new way to report the results.
I am doing a literature review on the effect of workplace bullying on nursing practice in the United Kingdom. I have been struggling to get primary studies or peer review papers.
I am frustrated because the deadline is very close.
What can I do?
Bullying - someone seeking to harm, intimidate or coerce. Would love to hear your opinion with regards to this issue.
Do you have any suggestions on using digital forensic software for research purposes?
Could data extracted through phone forensic methods give a never-before-seen insight into children's social networks?
Is data extracted through phone forensic methods more reliable than self-report methods?
which questionnaire may facilitate detection of denial by parents bullying their child
Can I please have questionnaire for my study. It is a quantitative study
One of my research hypothesis is:
There is a positive relationship between General bullying victimization and Social Media Use (SMU). The relationship between Cyberbullying victimization and SMU is stronger than between Traditional Bullying victimization and SMU.
Scaling:
Social Media Use:
0 = never
1 = rarely
2 = often
3 = very often
--> in my opinion this is an ordinal scale
Traditional Bullying Victimization and Cyberbullying Victimizations are Sum Scores. Also metric variables.
Thanks in advance for your help!
Is there anyone whose research domain is cyberbullying detection?
what are the forms of bullying within the school premises, hostel and while the student is going home
My intention is especially bullying in schools.
Dear friends
One thing I noted in academia is that competition can sometimes be just as fierce as in the world of business.
Sometimes it can be small and petty like who should be first author, often triggered by purely selfish reasons and following justifications.
In other cases competition can be about grands, effectively rendering someone unemployed in some cases. I have seen bullying, discrimination more frequently than in the world of business, the place I come from.
This is truly the dark side of academia, there are also positive things but these are things that make me sick to my stomach.
What is your experience? Do you agree with my rather dark view? If not, why? If yes, how can we fix it?
Best wishes Henrik
Hello there,
I am preparing focus groups with health professionals.
The content in general is not going to touch on any sensitive topics.
However, please state your opinion on how to react if someone reports that he/she was a target of bullying, harassments, or was verbally abused by line manager/supervisor/co-worker etc...
What can I should I do if something like that is reported?
Should I suggest contacting occupational psychologist? Talking to someone else from the supervision/management?
In general what guidance could I use to help those people who reveal content suggesting they have suffered at work and what is my role as a moderator for that?
Please share your experience and perhaps some examples from literature.
Many thanks in advance
Witold
I will be using these tools on my thesis.
Is there any article explaning workplace bullying trauma with polyvagal theory?
I'm working on a research proposal paper for my Senior Seminar in Psychology course, and I am unsure which statistical model to use. My research question is whether victims of workplace cyberbullying have higher absenteeism rates than employees who do not experience cyberbullying. My proposed hypothetical study will utilize a cross-sectional self-reported survey methodology. I believe Pearson's r would be appropriate to analyze the data, but I'm not sure.
It is common that we have significantly contributed to writing general reports (e.g. WHO reports) that are expected to result in several papers afterwards. This has especially been the case during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Afterwards, there are two scenarios:
1) You continue to contribute significantly to all the papers derived from the primary report and write the better part of them.
2) You stop contributing after the report is delivered and another team writes the papers.
What would you do if you get a message from the affiliated organisation (that claims the ownership of the main data or hired you during the report development) informing you that you are not the first author of the papers in each of these cases? Please feel free to expand and build upon the discussion.
P.S: To be clear, I am NOT talking about a thesis as the primary report.
Looking into workplace bullying came across the definition "Revenge" as experessed its a platform within organisational culture.
I want an example of a questionnaire or survey form for my research work(effects of Cyberbullying on undergraduate students). I have found few researcher papers but not related to my research work. Anyone can help me to find research questions or help me to share links. Thank you in advance.
This study examines the behavioural, individual and contextual variables that are expected to impact the perceived severity of workplace bullying behaviour. It also identifies the toxic behaviour involved in interacting with workplace bullying for the employees at AlHakim General Hospital in Iraq. Thus, to find the psychological symptoms associated with the related behaviours, the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) was used. Based on the analysis, the findings indicated that the severity and classification of workplace bullying behaviours had been influenced by the toxic behaviours involved through the characteristics of the employee who is subjected to those behaviours. The analysis conducted in this research also indicated that the behaviours that were personally harnessed from the corresponding target were more severe and frequent than other categories of behaviour. Finally, having an appropriate organisational system is of great importance to guarantee high performance in the organisation
I create a balanced data set and use it in cyber bullying detection ,All the performance metrics ( ACC, F1, Recall and Precision) are the same what is the interpretation ??
Dear all,
I wrote my bachelor's thesis. The topic is whether social support by a best friend moderates (mitigates) the relationship between bullying and emotional problems in primary school children.
For the first hypothesis (bullied children have more emotional problems than non-bullied) I performed an independent samples t-test (one-tailed).
However, for my second analysis - I did a moderation analysis using PROCESS macro (controlling for gender differences). I did not find a moderation of social support by a best friend and as recommended by Hayes (2018), if there is no moderation, you should do a regression without the interaction term. Thus, I did a hierarchical regression without the interaction term. I found that bullying has no effect on emotional problems anymore.
How can I explain that in the t-test bullying had an effect on emotional problems but not anymore in the hierarchical regression?
A post-hoc power analysis showed that my moderation analysis had a very high power of 0.98, thus type-II error is very low.
A preliminary t-test also showed that bullying had an effect on social support (bullied students had fewer social support than non-bullied students).
Bullying is someone keeps doing or saying things to have power over anther person .
there are many intervention around the world are being implemented in schools to reduce or prevent school bullying. Keen know about your experience and opinion it.
I am using the 'Revised Cyber Bullying Inventory'. This instrument has 2 sub-scales (bully scale and victim scale). From the responses, they will be divided into 4 groups (pure cyberbullies, pure cybervictims, bully/victim and uninvolved).To classify the individuals who are pure cyberbullies or victims, individuals would have to report engaging in or experiencing at least 1 out of the 14 behaviors on two or more occasions, on the bully or victim scale respectively. Individuals who are in the category of bully/victim are required to meet the criteria for both the bully and the victim. Those who are uninvolved or non-involved reports either a single behavior on a single occasion on either scale or having reported never having engaged in or experienced any of the mentioned behaviors.
I don't know how to group them into these 4 separate groups in SPSS. I’m worried about never knowing how to do this and I really need assistance!!
what are the emerging areas under "workplace bullying" that have a gap in knowledge
What is distraction in driving? How to measure the level of distraction? When and where is a driver more likely to be distracted?
I am exploring the effectiveness of State Anti-bullying policies.
i am currently conducting a study to assess bullying behaviors on student nurses during clinical placement .
My objective is to explore organisational factors that influence bullying behaviours at the hospital.
I would be glad if anyone can offer me a scale and permission to measure this objective.
thank you.
张文新老师在1999年在心理发展与教育上发表了《Olweus儿童欺负问卷中文版的修订》这篇论文,大神们有张文新老师修订后的欺负问卷吗?需要初中版的详细题目、维度和评分细则。正在做毕业论文,需要这个量表,求!
How do I measure self reporting quality of life impact on population with victim of bullying?
Please share relevant instrument if available or suggest some relevant instrument
Looking for collaborators/info sources for a new book I am writing in the career/life coaching
field on "Adult Bullies". Most research has been done on childhood bullying, however they
eventually grow up and cause problems at work, in organizations, etc. There are very few books written in this field, and I have a wealth of experience, however I am a career coach and IT
person, not a counselor. Anyone interested in joining this effort ? I have technical books out,
this will be first one in career self-help.
Here is an excrept from a paper:
Attrition analyses performed using Chi-square tests for independence (with Yates Continuity Correction) revealed that targets of bullying at T1 had a higher probability of dropout at T2 as compared with non-targets, χ2 (1, N = 2249) = 5.43, p = .02, phi = -.05. An
independent samples t-test also revealed that participants who only responded at T1
had significantly higher levels of job insecurity at T1 (M = 5.17, SD = 2.98) compared to
those who also responded at T2 (M = 4.81, SD = 2.8; t (1236.738) = 2.68, p = .007, twotailed), indicating that job insecurity is associated with higher probability of dropping
out from the study during the two-year time lag. No such tendency was found for
laissez-faire leadership.
Reference: Glambek, M., Skogstad, A., & Einarsen, S. (2018). Workplace bullying, the development of job insecurity and the role of laissez-faire leadership: A two-wave moderated mediation study. Work & Stress, 32(3), 297-312.
Hi,
I downloaded some social media messages on Twitter for cyberbullying detection. I want to detect cyberbullying based on machine learning through the data I have. Is there a dataset that you can recommend in English or Turkish on this subject?
I intend to write a research proposal that is the part of a PhD application, I recently has done thesis on workplace bullying and it's impact on employee creativity, so please suggest me latest topics for my proposal. Thanks
Most of the researches on bullying were from psychological perspective . Are there any researches on bullying from educational perspective?
I am conducting a qualitative research on the process women go through to overcome workplace bullying in the financial sector. What approach can be used in obtaining participants? Are there qualitative research sites out there as is available for quantitative research?
That has been some commentary about increased racism, bullying and xenophobia against Chinese/ Asian people in the wake of the Coronavirus.
Can anyone point me to quality resrouces for schools to help prevent and respond to this behaviour in the school community. Any research or relevant resources following the SARS outbreak in 2002?
Having to shift to remote or online teaching and learning is new to many of us. Unfortunately, not knowing how to make this shift is leading some of those in leadership to resort to bullying storms, causing more anxiety and intimidation in addiion to all the uncertainty of COVID-19. How are you dealing with these bullying storms and other emotionally charged exchanges in academia at this time?
am looking for a self report scale measuring cyberbystander behaviour, an currently working on it, thinking of using participant role scale, a subscale of it measure bystander behaviour but for traditional bullying, there seems to be no scale that measures bystander behaviour in cyberbullying
any help pls
Academic bullying is more pervasive in science than previously thought.
see:
Below is the research question I would like to work on as a practice improvement project in my final year at uni.
Increasing the minimum age limit to 16 in conjunction with identity verification for users of social networking applications to reduce the prevalence of cyber bullying and suicide among 11 to 16 year olds.
This is an area Im passionate about however Im not even sure where to start in scaling the research down to make it a pilot study and manageable for a university project.
We dont actually have to carry out the research but just interpret how we would carry this out and the results we would hope to see.
Any help would be appreciated.
TIA.
The Einstein Rocketship explained to Young and Old
Otto E. Rossler
Faculty of Science, University of Tuebingen, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany
Abstract: Popular talk given at the Nell-Breuning Highschool in Rottweil on January 12, 2016
***
It is fun to picture this most beautiful brainchild of a scientist who always called it “the happiest thought of my life.” What is it that is so “happy” about it? Can a thought be happy?
It is maximally simple and yet maximally absurd in its consequences. Such a coincidence is unprecedented. This lad was a gift to the planet.
Just embark on an Apollo-like rocketship in your mind. Unlike the real one, it is not filled with propellant throughout: In the middle it has a narrow passenger cabin that runs along the whole length and width of the ship. Therefore you can make simple experiments on board if you brought along your pocket laser-pointer and a pocket frequency counter. Thirdly, you may bring along a smoke-filled glass tube through which to send a laser pulse while the tube lies on the floor or is glued to the ceiling, so as to take snapshots of an internally advancing light pulse from above or below. The ship is assumed to be accelerating constantly in outer space while you make the measurements.
The same equipment (pointer, counter and tube) you can also use inside a huge church tower on earth, with predictably the same measurement results. The experiment is so simple that “mere thinking” suffices to make valid predictions. This is what Einstein did in 1907 with all the mentioned equipment not being available as of yet.
The least surprising prediction is that, when you hold the laser pointer horizontally at any height inside the accelerating rocketship, the horizontal light ray that comes out will be gently downward-curved inside the accelerating rocketship. This effect is very small since the rocketship is so slender. Moreover, von Soldner had already predicted gravitational light bending a century before in 1804.
The most famous surprise found by Einstein is the following: When the laser is pointing upwards from the floor and you count the pulses at the tip, the counter will show a reduced ticking rate compared to what is valid on the bottom – despite the maintained distance. For during the time the light is ascending with its limited universal velocity c, the tip did continue picking up speed away from the emission point. Hence a Doppler effect applies, like the slowed pitch of a receding ambulance.
This was Einstein’s main prediction. It appeared totally absurd at the time. Nonetheless Einstein’s “gravitational redshift” is confirmed everyday by the GPS in our cars. The satellites overhead make for the ceiling of a rather high church tower indeed (their fast motion does not abolish the effect).
Pointing the laser downwards from the tip will show the opposite effect – an increase in the count rate compared to what holds true above when measuring downstairs.
What else can we do with this mental or real toy? The second big implication seen by Einstein applies when the tube with the smoke in it is lying on the bottom while watched from the tip. Einstein predicted correctly that the light speed inside will look reduced from above: A second absurd prediction made out of the blue by sheer thinking. And when you look from the bottom up to the ceiling, the transversal speed of light will look increased there (a fact that remained unmentioned).
The correctly predicted observable change in c caused Einstein to fall silent on gravitation for almost 4 years. For the theory of special relativity with its by definition globally constant c had produced an implication that amounts to a contradiction-in-terms. This illogical state of affairs is still the accepted teaching of to date. I hope you did enjoy the ride. But: is there not something missing here?
When staring a bit longer into the Einstein-Apollo-rocket, we may suddenly realize that the light ray, while visibly “creeping” across the floor (or else visibly “zipping” across the ceiling), is not moving horizontally as this was assumed so far. The tilt – an upwards tilt in either case – is owed to the fact that when the propagating light ray reaches the next spot on the horizontal floor, the previous point has already fallen back a bit relative to the tip in the meantime (or else has come somewhat closer to the bottom from above, respectively). Hence the no longer horizontal light ray has re-gained in either case the universal speed c – as originally presupposed.
At this point, an encouragement from the part of the reader or listener is vital because the relative upwards slant seen is not part of the narrative since 1907. Can Einstein have possibly overlooked this detail?
The Virtual-Reality-like thoughts described – which hopefully will soon be part of a computer game – were so taxing for Einstein that they “singed” his brain as he once confessed. He feared to go crazy and looked for mental shelter from his longtime friend,, mathematician Marcel Grossmann, in order to continue functioning. Everyone knows that the most difficult dynamical equation of history would come out eventually: the Einstein field equation. Does that equation contain the “relative upwards slant” proportional to vertical distance that we just spotted jointly? The answer is in the negative.
But the present playful text is supposed to be a kindergarten version of Einstein’s equivalence principle between gravity and ordinary acceleration, is it not? Virtually all specialists (except Wolfgang Rindler) scoff at texts without equations: Can it be that the mathematically educated establishment has gone astray for so long?
“Thinking helps” according to Hewlett-Packard. The new “relative upwards slant” of light rays hugging the horizontal floor inside the Einstein rocketship, valid relative to above (or below), repairs the so far accepted violation of c as a global constant of nature in the vacuum. A well-known result from special relativity – that the speed of light inside a transversally receding light tube appears reduced (or increased if approaching) was overlooked. So everything is fine again: c remains a globally (and not just locally) valid constant of nature in a return to the pre-1911 Einstein.
Why be hesitant? The reader will be appalled to realize that the retrieved global c entails that the cosmos cannot expand any more since distant points can no longer recede from each other at more than c as everyone believes does occur. By denying the Big Bang you will make yourself a laughingstock among your peers when you tell them that you approve of the above “mental analog computer” of the Einstein-Apollo rocketship. So you will have to decide whether rather to trust your own firm judgment or let yourself be bullied into behaving like a dogmatist. In science and elsewhere, dogmas have a knack for being deadly. Therefore: Is the above conclusion (“relative upwards slant”) correct or is it not?
I for one am sure 99 percent of the time that it is correct. One reason to remain skeptical is the fact that it is such an immense fun to be more right than 3 ½ generations of specialists from the year 1911 on. This feeling, if legitimate, is accompanied by an immense gratitude to this young amateur scientist of 1907 who took on the whole establishment with the verve of a total outsider. I need not tell you that at present, the scientific community is gladly betting the planet on the above story being false. But this is another tale. Thank you for having lent me your ear, my young colleagues, gentlegirls and gentlemen.
Paper dedicated to the late Wolfgang Rindler (who liked it as he wrote me).
07.10.2019
Some of our friends or colleague give an assignments a lot to the students, because they want their students learn some thing beyond the students capability. Its bullying in education or what??
Recently, collective bullying by a veteran teacher was conducted for a young teacher in Kobe in Japan. This is a big problem, and every time I watch TV and Internet news, I feel sad. In Tokyo, the recruitment ratio for elementary school teachers is 1.1 times, and it is expected to drop further. I am worried that the Japanese education system will be destroyed by the Deterioration of teacher quality. Such a problem will influence Japan and other countries in the near future. I hope any comment which is useful for children.
People are being tracked with their data in every possible manner.
This has led to nations/states using data to discriminate, bully, and condemn citizens and used as a means to pre-judge, punish and cutoff citizens from access to all of the benefits of citizenship. China currently uses a "Social Scoring system ", a manipulative and coercive attack on society to force homogenization and brainwashed acceptance of standards set by corrupt people who are in power.
This, in turn, makes the discriminated people become prisoners against their will and for arbitrary purposes with no rational or legal process. It also makes them to be slaves, economically and physically.
Is it just for other humanity to sit idle and observe this form of Hitlerism, or should all forms of Social Scoring be called out as violations 9f human rights.
For the record, I clearly view this as as an animalistic manipulation against human rights and condemn China and all others who use a social scoring system to abuse humanity. It is shameful, globally illegal and a violation of human rights.
What are theories of bullying at work?
What patterns or types of bullying theories work?
What bullying theories mean?
Can I know the types of bullying theories at work?
Is there a study studying bullying and its relationship to leadership?
What is the questionnaire used to bully at work?
What are the measures and questionnaires used to measure bullying at work?