Science topic

Braces - Science topic

Braces are orthopedic appliances used to support, align, or hold parts of the body in correct position. (Dorland, 28th ed)
Questions related to Braces
  • asked a question related to Braces
Question
1 answer
I am at the initial stage any suggestion or help will be highly appreciated.
Relevant answer
Answer
"I'm sorry, but I do not have expertise in this topic. For accurate and reliable information, I recommend consulting with an expert or someone with experience in this field."
  • asked a question related to Braces
Question
2 answers
I am reading two articles about the determination of equivalent viscous damping( 1. "Wijesundara KK, Nascimbene R, Sullivan T (2011) Equivalent viscous damping for steel concentrically braced frame structures" and 2. "Jayasooriya1 · D. W. U. Indika1 · K. K. Wijesundara1 · P. Rajeev Equivalent viscous damping for steel eccentrically braced frame structures with buckling restraint braces"). From the flowchart and description, I understand that we first determine the equivalent damping ratio ξeq = ξel + ξhyst (ξhyst form cyclic analysis in opensees). From ξ, we find the damped displacement spectrum. From this spectrum and for the plasticity we are examining, thus for the given horizontal displacement (Δtarget), we find the effective period Teff. Then, we determine the effective mass meff = (Keff * Teff^2) / (4π^2) and distribute the mass in the two nodes of the frame where we run the analysis in opensees. If the average horizontal displacement resulting from the inelastic time history analyses is close to the level of displacement we are examining (deviation less than 5%), then the ξ we took is accepted. If we have a greater deviation, we consider a new ξeq, resulting in a new spectrum, a new Teff, and a new mass (Keff remains the same from the initial hysteresis loop).
From the above, I deduce that if the displacement found is less than Δtarget in the time history analyses, the initial mass calculated is not sufficient and must be increased to increase the mass, thus increasing Teff. This means that for the same Δtarget, the spectrum must "drop," thus increasing the damping. In other words, a smaller Δ means that in the new approach, higher damping should be considered to increase meff and result in greater displacements (only ξel is defined as Rayleigh damping in the model). In the second paper, in paragraph 4, an example is mentioned where the correction is the opposite. That is, it starts with a high damping ratio with Δ < Δtarget and ends with a smaller one to approach Δtarget. If we look at the logic of the correction process described in both papers, smaller ξ would lead to a smaller Teff, smaller mass, and therefore smaller displacement. I suppose I have not understood something correctly in the iterative correction process.
Relevant answer
Thank you very much for the response. That's what I understood as well (and indeed it seems counterintuitive), but I got confused with the second article which describes in the example reduction of damping in order to achieve the target Δ. Thank you again
  • asked a question related to Braces
Question
4 answers
Different clinicians follow different aligner wear protocols for their patients such as, 7,10 or 14 day protocol. What are your views?
Relevant answer
Answer
This unique process works because each new tray is straight than the preceding tray Aligner wear protocol
It's worth noting that the clear aligners are only effective when they are in physical contact with the teeth
For that reason Invisalignly recommends that the tray bewor atlist 20-22hours per day
  • asked a question related to Braces
Question
5 answers
Hi everyone, I want to model the shear links in an Eccentric Braced Frame Structural System. My problem is selecting the best element object in opensees/openseespy which can replicate the hysteretic behavior of its as the experimental test results show. I have found some papers: 1) 2018.05.22 - Experimental and numerical assessment of EBF structures with shear links (Silvia Caprili et al) 2) 2016.06.02 - Seismic Behavior of Direct Displacement-based Designed Eccentrically Braced Frames (Mohebkhah et al) I think the 1st one is more easier to model. Has anybody have any idea whether there are other object elements more straight forward to use instead while it can best replicate the hysteretic behavior? I also need an example of how to use that suggested approach if available (and also for any of the above mentioned models). Thanks, Husayn
Relevant answer
Answer
Thank you Mr. Yousef Bahrambeigi
I will apply the code you provided for me and if I had any questions I will bother you asking again.
  • asked a question related to Braces
Question
3 answers
I am currently working on my thesis in Retrofitting of soft story. At first step i am trying to validate a experimental test. There i need to model a bracing with gap in it. The bracing should act only in compression after the gap is closed and free in tension. For creating simplified model i tried to create compression only element with uniaxial non linear elasticity model available for steel in Diana where i gave input to stress-strain diagram with very small value in tension and in compression, i gave nearly 0 value upto strain when gap closes and after that normal stress strain value of steel. I got the hysterisis result where there is increases in lateral resistance as compared to test result. how an i fix this? Is there any approach to model gap element? i tried contact analysis too but could not make it out.I have attached hysteresis result of Experiment and Diana Modeling. The bracing should start working after 1% drift.
Thank you.
Relevant answer
Add an interface element with your manual stiffness properties almost 0 till a certain displacement and then increase the stiffness when the gap is closed.
drop me an email if you need more info.
a.vandenbos_NLyseConsultants.com
  • asked a question related to Braces
Question
3 answers
Hello researchers,
I have been modelling the cyclic behavior of bracings using ABAQUS. when I take the hysteresis loop once the model has run I get the graph with straight lines as shown in the first figure. Even though I have defined the plastic model for the material, I am unable to obtain the Bauschinger effect during load reversals. Can someone please help me out !
Thanks in advance !!
Relevant answer
Answer
as I understand you have basically two questions: 1) why the force-displacement curve consists of straight lines ans 2) why there are no Bauschinger effect.
1) It may be beneficial to increase the number of field output frames per step.To do this, in Step module go to Output->Field Output Requests Manager. From there, try to set the "Frequency" option to at least 100 frames per one circle. You can do thisby choosing frame time "Every x units of time", or by total number of frames "Evenly spaced time intervals".
2) Exactly what manifestation of the Bauschinger effect do you want to see on the cyclic test graph? To me, the results look quite plausible, although the curves are not exactly smooth. If you determine the properties of a plastic material using a kinematic hardening flow curve (in your case flow line, as you define linear plasticity), the force-displacement curve will reach a steady state circle after a few amplitudes and will remain almost unchanged regasrdint the number of amplitudes.
In Abaqus for the cyclic modeling the Chaboche material model is used:
The model consists of an isotropic and kinematic part. The isotropic part determines the expansion of the yield locus, and the kinematic part controls the displacement of the yield locus. In your material properties description, there is only the kinematic part, meaning that the material does not harden, only the yield locus shifts.
If you want define both kinamatic and isotropic part, you can use "Combined" hardening option for kinematic part and "Suboptions->Cyclic Hardening" option for isotropic part.
Sincerely,
Pavlo
  • asked a question related to Braces
Question
1 answer
I am make a model of eccentric braced frame and I need to run it with FNA but no Plastic Hinges Results appear
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Michael,
I think FNA does not support hinge analysis. Try Nonlinear Time History analysis with Direct Integration. With such analysis You will get Plastic Hinges Results.
Best regarts.
  • asked a question related to Braces
Question
1 answer
For my graduation project I need to determine the cost of buckling restrained braces of different sizes and properties. Does anyone know how much is the approximate cost of each one and the cost of the tests required? For example, for the case of fluid viscous dampers, there are relationships in the literature of the type Cost = A*ForceDamper^b that allow estimating its cost.
Does anyone know if there are similar relationships exist for BRBs?
P.S. I have tried to contact some manufacturers but that kind of information is confidential
Thanks
Relevant answer
Answer
Here they present a cost depending on the core material. Consider inflation and that's it.
Guerrero, H. et al.(2017) ‘Evaluation of the economic benefits of using Buckling-Restrained Braces in hospital structures located in very soft soils’, Engineering Structures, 136, pp. 406–419. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.01.038.
  • asked a question related to Braces
Question
3 answers
I want to model the link-to-column connections in the ABAQUS program. But I need a sample resource.
Relevant answer
Answer
in the below link you can find a video tutorial about eccentrically braced frames. hope to be helpful.
  • asked a question related to Braces
Question
2 answers
How to assign force-deformation relationship and performance levels and parameters adopted from FEMA (2005) in SAP2000 or braces
Relevant answer
Answer
Yes Sir. Thank you
  • asked a question related to Braces
Question
4 answers
I work on a model of steel frame of vertical and upper bracing in Abaqus... after run by dynamic explicit , I found 2 of the upper bracings and 4 of the vertical ones have got away from building... Although I tied them to columns
any one had similar problem could help?
Note :- the same model of all details did the run successfully in static...
Relevant answer
Answer
thanks all for your help
  • asked a question related to Braces
Question
2 answers
The "two groups" will be in fact the same group of people. The first time they will not wear a brace while the second time they will wear one. The posttest measure will be after a fatigue protocol is executed.
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Marilla,
If the measurement is a continuous variable, then you could use a paired (Student's) t-test.
Best regards,
Carl Ribaudo
  • asked a question related to Braces
Question
1 answer
If we consider corn, it has primary, seminal and crown roots. Primary and seminal roots are embryonic roots while crown (and brace) roots are post embryonic. I am wondering if hormonal release such as strigoractone release would be different in above mentioned root types of corn.
Relevant answer
Answer
I'm not aware of a specific study, but I would expect at least a slight difference, as the adventitious prop (crown) roots have a physical support role (like the buttress roots of tropical rainforest trees; https://www.jstor.org/stable/23694348) and are particularly lignified. Very often plant tissues face a trade off between physiological and mechanical roles, and in this case the prop roots should be seen as an investment in mechanics. You could grow maize in a simple hydroponics system using glass jars or tubes of Hewitt's nutrient solution, with different roots in different jars, 'sealed' with cotton wool. Change the nutrient solution every 2/3 days, and finally swap out the nutrient solution for distilled water for 24 hours. Collect the water (which will be full of root exudates) and root tissue, and measure the strigolactone concentration in both using ultra high performance liquid chromatography ( ).
  • asked a question related to Braces
Question
4 answers
I am modelling a steel truss bridge with a steel deck for IRC Roadway vehicular loading. We know that the top chord (while in compression) is susceptible to buckling. Although there are members such as diagonals and verticals connecting the bottom chord with the top chord, which could offer some amount to lateral resistance, I am not able to find a solid way to account for that. How do I ensure lateral stability check in this case? Do I ignore the resistance offered by verticals and diagonals? Let me know if you need more details?
Relevant answer
Dear friend please pose the question properly. What is the span? What is the width of the deck? What is the height of truss girders? What is the span to depth ratio? My dear friend fundamentals in behavioral mechanics is very important. If the span to height is low, shear predominates in that case you don't need a brace for the compression chord. Dear friend you must understand that at this age please improve your fundamentals. What are you doing IRC in HKP?
  • asked a question related to Braces
Question
3 answers
Dear All,
I have the MATLAB files of the isolated benchmark building. However, in those files the building is modeled using its eigenvalues and no information is given regarding the columns, beams, and braces section sizes, spaces, and other data so that someone can use to model the benchmark building in another software.
I would appreciate your assistance if someone can share this information or can guide on how to obtain the data.
Regards,
Relevant answer
Answer
I suggest contacting Professor Satish Nagarajaiah, as mentioned on the webpage:
  • asked a question related to Braces
Question
1 answer
I want to design a building with BRB. for modeling BRB in it I have two kinds of sections ("core brace" and "star seismic") when I use "star seismic" and define "Area of yielding core", after design, I found that the area that used, is about 4 times bigger than that I define. Do you have any idea about this problem?
and
for defining inelastic data for BRB, in the picture that I send, I do not know how should I fill it? and what does this parameter means?
thank you for your help
Relevant answer
Answer
Nice
  • asked a question related to Braces
Question
2 answers
According to Eurocode 3, multiplanar KK-Joints have to be prooven for shearing in the gap between the braces. Do i have to do the shearproof for each plane or for the whole connection, or both? If for the whole connection, what is V gap? Some literature only uses the maximum axial braceload multiplied by sin(brace angle) other use both loads in the braces. The second approach is very conservative isn't it? What happens if they are asymmetricaly loaded? 
Relevant answer
Answer
That is a good question.
  • asked a question related to Braces
Question
3 answers
Hi all,
I have been modeling Buckling Restrained Brace(BRB) for more than 2 months, the analysis is aborting every time with following errors and warnings:
warnings:
1. 2 unconnected regions in the model ( I have been seeing this warning right from the start).
2. The system matrix has negative eigenvalues
errors:
1. Time increment required is less than the minimum specified
2. The analysis has been terminated due to previous errors. All output requests have been written for the last converged increment.
The modeling details are:
1. The core and casing is completely made with steel, with the combined hardening plasticity model.
2. Their is a gap of 12 mm around the steel core and steel casing(please see the second photo) with surface to surface interaction with penalty of 0.1 frictional coefficient.
3. One end is fixed and at the other end subjected to axial displacement increments and analysis out is attached below (U1 in third photo is in mm).
What I observed was as soon as the core touching the casing, the analysis will continue for short time and gets aborted.
Any answer is helpful.
Thanks in advance.
Relevant answer
Answer
That is a good question.
  • asked a question related to Braces
Question
2 answers
Hello
I intend to model a diagonal steel brace in an experimental model using the finite element method. Can anyone introduce a valid experimental model?
The model must have details of the dimensions and specifications of the materials.
Relevant answer
Answer
  • asked a question related to Braces
Question
2 answers
I want to model buckling restrained bracing in SeismoStruct software but i could not find any resource on this. What type of element should I use as there is no direct element for buckling restrained bracing.
Please help.
Relevant answer
Answer
You may carry out a search on Seismosoft's Forum(https://seismosoft.com/forum/) for the term "buckling restrained".
  • asked a question related to Braces
Question
1 answer
Compare the three systems ( Fixed base, Base isolation, and Fluid Viscous Damper of braces corner) I need someone to help me with this system.
  • asked a question related to Braces
Question
8 answers
On what basis are the section size of the chevron brace and the SR (The ratio of the stiffness of the brace and the damper to the stiffness of the story) determined in design of the TADAS damper?
Relevant answer
Answer
Mehran Shahpari thank you for sharing these articles.
  • asked a question related to Braces
Question
1 answer
I am doing a non-linear time history analysis of my structure in sap2000. so when I assign hinges to diamond bracing I am facing the below issue. kindly help me to how to solve it. Thank you
Relevant answer
Answer
When using the “auto” option on steel structures, the software only allows certain sections to be assigned to the “auto” joint. It is because the software in the auto joint must detect whether the section is compacted or not, such as box sections and I-shaped profiles. If the sections you are using are not like these sections, you must define the joint manually, and it is up to you to determine whether it is compact or not.
  • asked a question related to Braces
Question
8 answers
I have performed a nonlinear static analysis in etabs for a steel braced frame. The pushover curve is linear and the model has shown any yielding. But the analysis has stopped before reaching the target displacement. I do not know why?
Please suggest what to do. Why the analysis is stopping if there is no plastic hinge formed before reaching the target displacement?
Relevant answer
Answer
Complementing Karim Aljawhari 's comment, this problem may be related to numerical convergence issues (assuming the nonlinear hinges were assigned properly). When I performed pushover analysis in ETABS, I found out that if the target displacement is unrealistic big the software stops running before hinges are formed. My suggestion is to reduce the target displacement and check if the software will at least run until the target is reached. If the software still stops prematurely, then it probably means that you have to change some of the nonlinear analysis parameters.
I hope this helps :) Good luck
Rafaela
  • asked a question related to Braces
Question
4 answers
I am performing pushover analysis in Etabs of a steel braced frame but oI do not know what value should I use for target displacement. The height of the building is 20m. I want to know what value should I use according to ASCE 41-17?
Please help me to solve this issue.
Relevant answer
Answer
Thank you very much, sir.
  • asked a question related to Braces
Question
2 answers
I am trying to model a concrete-filled steel tube as bracing in my work. I am confused about how to model the plastic hinge for the brace.
Which type of plastic hinge should I use for this purpose?
Please suggest how to do it in sap2000 / etabs ?
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi Muhd Ubaid,
SAP200 allows you to use the concentrated plasticity approach (e.g. hinges). Therefore, you need a backbone curve for the concrete-filled steel tube that is calibrated experimentally in order to estimate the necessary parameters (or you use some theoretical concepts like moment-rotation). Otherwise, you can model it simply using fiber sections, which are unfortunately not supported by SAP2000. I recommend SeismoStruct for that purpose.
I hope this helps :)
Good luck with your work.
Karim
  • asked a question related to Braces
Question
3 answers
Dear researchers
What are the primary defects associated with welding druring construction-stages which might influence the capacity of the gusset-plate connections in concentrated braced frames? (Considering the fillet weld, for example, can one quantify the capacity reduction of gusset-plates due to the presence of those flaws?)
Any reference, guideline, or research regarding the above issue which clarify the following would be good
- Different types of defects associated with regular welding types
- Can the effect of defects be quantified?
- Is there any mathematical distribution for each defect?
Relevant answer
Answer
One more http://books.totalarch.com/node/6250, but in Russian
  • asked a question related to Braces
Question
12 answers
I am trying to model the shear-link in etabs for nonlinear time history analysis.
I do not know how to model the nonlinear behavior of this link.
Please help.
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Amir Shirkhani sir,
Thank you very much for your clarification.
  • asked a question related to Braces
Question
4 answers
I am trying to model the shear link in sap2000/ etabs by I do not know how to model the web stiffened beam in this software because for the shear link we have to use web stiffness.
Please suggest how to do it.
I want to perform a nonlinear dynamic analysis of this model.
Relevant answer
Answer
Thank you sir.
  • asked a question related to Braces
Question
1 answer
Dear all,
I was wondering if anyone can tell me how to get the viscous story shear resulting from Rayleigh damping of a component ( e.g., a brace) in OpenSees?
Thanks in advance.
Relevant answer
Answer
Arash Poursadrollah , You cannot do it. You can just evaluate damping forces at the nodes of the model. Indeed, Damping matrix is built starting from stiffness and mass matrix...
  • asked a question related to Braces
Question
4 answers
Dear colleagues
I have experimental tests databases for steel structures (bracing and outrigger). If any of you have interest and specialty in this area can join our research group. We decided to include artificial neural network (ANN) combined with metaheuristic algorithm to estimate the results of experimental test.
I can share more information if you are interested.
You may contact me here or my personal email address:
Relevant answer
Answer
I am working on NN and metaheuristcs
  • asked a question related to Braces
Question
5 answers
I modeled a bridge on ANSYS APDL and added cross bracings / diaphragms as shown below. The diaphragms are not straight along the x or y or z direction, they are inclides BEAM188 elements.
how can I get the axial stress for inclined Beam188 elements?
Relevant answer
Answer
by using an Element Table, see Ansys Help
  • asked a question related to Braces
Question
3 answers
Eccentrically Braced Frame building of 6 story modeled in SAP 2000. Conducting a non-linear dynamic response to earthquakes.
Relevant answer
Answer
pm
  • asked a question related to Braces
Question
8 answers
During Pushover analysis, the curve doesn't reach defined target displacement and the curve becomes almost linear when bracing is provided on the top floor.
Any Idea how to fix this?
Relevant answer
Answer
Vibgyor Tash Repost your query as a question then someone would answer you.
  • asked a question related to Braces
Question
5 answers
For the modelling of inverted V bracing, I need to provide node at the center of the beam to create the inverted V bracing but if I am providing the node as a hinge, the model is not running. However, if I am giving it as a fixed connection, the model is running but in actual fixity should not be there..
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi Brij Shah
let's say you have two beams connection in the middle (where chevron brace is meeting). simple it will have a moment in both side. I recommend you, first simply model a chevron brace in sap2000 ( it is easy to assign it, just see some YouTube videos), and then compare your results with Opensees, it will be easy to comprehend. After that, you can do whatever you want in OpenSees.
regards,
  • asked a question related to Braces
Question
6 answers
I have modelled a steel building according to example 5 given in opensees in which I have provided cross bracing on each storey and I am two applying earthquake force one having scaling factor of 0.1 and one having scaling factor of 1. after performing the analysis the difference in their displacement is coming out very less which should not be in real because the difference of magnitude of earthquake is very high. So how to check were the mistake has been made. If I am removing the bracings from ground floor or from middle floor, I am getting correct values.
Relevant answer
Answer
Al Mouayed Bellah Nafeh Sure, will do that. thank you so much for your advice.
  • asked a question related to Braces
Question
4 answers
Are there any commercially available test system/walking simulator to test
(1) ankle foot orthotics
(2) knee braces
(3) knee ankle foot orthosis
Relevant answer
Answer
Yes, there are many lower body exoskeletons commercially available.
  • asked a question related to Braces
Question
3 answers
There is a steel pipe rack with normal framing system including horizontal and vertical bracing systems, all the connections of the horizontal bracing are defected, for some reasons it is nearly impossible to re-weld the connections without a shutdown for the operation. What are the alternatives for horizontal bracing system? For example adding new members and removing the horizontal bracing members completely as in the portal framing which is an alternative for vertical bracing.
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi, if the weld connection is not a must for the project, I think a cable bracing system with bolt connections can be installed as the horizontal bracing of the pipe rack.
  • asked a question related to Braces
Question
4 answers
Practically, how to retrofit existing building with:
- Shear walls
- Base isolation
- Viscous dampers
Lateral Bracing
Kind Regards.
  • asked a question related to Braces
Question
3 answers
Hi I'm modeling a structure in opensees. Static linear analysis is modeled in opensees. The question is can i consider imperfection and buckling for my braced members or in static linear analysis it's not necessary to consider buckling of braces?
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi Nariman. I did not understand your question quite well. However, as far as I know, buckling analysis (stability analysis) is another type of nonlinear analysis which considers the second-order effects which exacerbated the instability issues of the structural model.s
  • asked a question related to Braces
Question
3 answers
Dear all,
Currently I am doing a performance based earthquake analysis for a braced steel structure in SAP2000 using the nonlinear time-history procedure.To obtain the storey shears, I am using the -section.-cut method available in post processing. However it is seen that the link element could not be selected during the section cut and hence the obtained resultant forces are not correct. Kindly suggest me how to include the links in a storey as well in the computation of storey shears.
Relevant answer
Answer
You could find answers to your questions on SAP2000 at its specific forums, e.g., https://www.eng-tips.com/threadminder.cfm?pid=801
  • asked a question related to Braces
Question
1 answer
Actually for a project of FEA class, I need to perform FEA analysis for braces application. Please guide from where could I get the CT scans files. Because CT scan files can be converted to CAD model.
Relevant answer
Answer
There are few links which may be helpful for you:
In addition to these links, following papers may be more insightful for your complete project:
1. Wallner, J. et al. Computed tomography data collection of the complete human mandible and valid clinical ground truth models. Sci. Data. 6:190003 https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2019.3 (2019).
2. Aki Hasegawa, Akikazu Shinya, Yuji Nakasone, Lippo V. J. Lassila, Pekka K. Vallittu, and Akiyoshi Shinya, “Development of 3D CAD/FEM Analysis System for Natural Teeth and Jaw Bone Constructed from X-Ray CT Images,” International Journal of Biomaterials, vol. 2010, Article ID 659802, 7 pages, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/659802.
  • asked a question related to Braces
Question
3 answers
I'm working with my senior design group to create a customizable brace for PCL injuries. We are able to find general specs for fitting. We are looking for screw hole sizes to give us a starting point to help us join the pieces together.
Relevant answer
Answer
  • asked a question related to Braces
Question
4 answers
Hello everyone!
I am new to abaqus and i am trying to model buckling restrained braces. I am finding difficult in modeling brace. As we know that the brace is composed of core (restrained and yielding), transition (restrained and unyielding) and end section (unrestrained and unyielding). My doubt is how to define these three elements having difference behavior in abaqus.
Thank you!
Relevant answer
Answer
For modeling BRB in ABAQUS
you should modeling yielding core , concrete core and steel tube .
Interaction between Yielding core and concrete core is contact without friction ( friction less , normal behavior : Hard contact )
interaction between concrete core and Steel tube is contact with coefficient of friction 0.3 (friction coefficient is 0.3 , normal behavior : Hard contact)
  • asked a question related to Braces
Question
7 answers
I have to validate my project for finite element analysis.
Relevant answer
Answer
My suggestions are:
Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering by Wiley
Journal of Constructional Steel Research by Elsevier (If your structure is steel)
  • asked a question related to Braces
Question
6 answers
Dear researcher
I need to design the shear plate metallic damper connected to chevron bracing for retrofitting the reinforced concrete frame, So could you please provide me any reference or design procedure for this type of dampers.
best regards
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi Ahmed
In my recently published paper, I provided a simple way to design a structural fuse embedded in a bracing member by considering a reduction factor, you can also find some related pieces of information which I mentioned below:
if you need additional help, feel free to message me.
good luck.
  • asked a question related to Braces
Question
4 answers
Hi,
Could you please advise how to model an X bracing, in which the diagonals are continuous for their full length and are not connected at the intersection point in ETABS?
Please see attached picture.
Thank you,
Linh
Relevant answer
Answer
draw one element from a to c
not two elements ab and bc
  • asked a question related to Braces
Question
11 answers
If designer has two options of selection of one X bracing in one span or two Z bracing in two spans in steel structures, what are the advantages/disadvantages of using one X bracing in one span compared to two Z bracing in two spans in steel structures?
Relevant answer
Hi, prof Sadeghi.
Yes, in the past I was forced many times to change the X solution to others. I didn't say a word about what some call as "double Y" solution. If you retire one of the legs bellow and at the same time move the plate connecting the other bars in such way to reduce to less than middle length the leg wich is now alone, you will form one Y. If you make this twice, in a mirrored way, you reach the "double Y". This construction is very expensive, requires a lot of work in design, fabrication and most of all at the site, when doing the assembly.
In general, the designer seldom thinks that the columns are not perfectly vertical, the pieces have some curvature, the plates of conncection have some differences caused by the welding contraction. The result is that the perfect angle of the drawing is hard to reach in the assembly. One of the most tragic things is the diference of level, don't think it is so much. Some diference from 2 to 4 mm can appear suddenly and you just don't know from where it come from. To avoid this condition, many companies require that any kind of bracimg must be pre-mounted before ship, or even and best, before the welding of the connecting plates. Therefore, the welding is done with everything pre-mounted. This arises the cost and the part of workman hours per ton, which obviously the companies try to avoid as much as possible.
Add to this that it is usual practice of the designer to reduce from 1 to 3 mm the length of the bars that form the legs, to induce some kind of pre-tension in the legs (removing the gap of the holes, when using bolts). This thing increases the "nightmare". (lgs).
I guess that the double Y solution don't reach 50% of efficience, based on your parameters of study, but when the industrial owner or manager requires some free space in the bracing system for operating machines and transport, the situation becomes very complicated for the projetist engineer.
And things can be even worse, when the X braces are criminously cut (the industrial workers without consentiment of the engineer department or of the constructor remove some leg) or the whole set., without any notice.
To prevent accidents comming from this, I always used two bracing systems in the buildings up to 5 bays, and not less than 3 for the bigger.
In the last times, I used more of the "V" or "A" shape brancing system, which provides a better open area and is more atrative then other solutions. And this I recommend when you cannot use the X. The geometrical draw with triangles please me so much and also the most of architects.
Thank you so much for the opportunity the contribute with my words.
I love this subject. Bye.
  • asked a question related to Braces
Question
8 answers
I'm working on the RCC bracing concept to reduce the displacement. using push over analysis through  Etabs V13. Do the bracing required to be assigned with hinge, if yes which book could I refer?
Relevant answer
Answer
Depends on actual situation of connections in your frame modelling. If they have fixed supports, no need for applying hinge at the the phases before post-elastic phases and after performing plastic hinges you may model the connections as plastic hinges, but if you have designed the joints with simple connections you may consider normal hinges in safe side.
  • asked a question related to Braces
Question
11 answers
Is there any relationship available to relate brace angles and lateral displacement in steel diagrid building ?
I am looking for possible optimum brace angle which result in low lateral displacement.
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi Mridul Rawat
in my paper is the optimum angle would come between 60-70 degrees
link of my paper is
  • asked a question related to Braces
Question
4 answers
hi iwant to model sma braces in opensees ,
do you have any examples of modeling sma braces in opensees?
Relevant answer
  • asked a question related to Braces
Question
7 answers
Orthodontic treatment
Relevant answer
نعم
  • asked a question related to Braces
Question
2 answers
In designing high-rise buildings, the three parameters of strength, hardness and stability are very important, and the higher the building is built, the greater the impact of hardness and stability on the optimal design of the structure, and the effects of these two factors, designed to design against the lateral loads of wind and earthquake, dominate They go back. The best way to meet these two factors is to use the forms and models of the structures, which, while maintaining hardness, reduce the structural stability by reducing the deformations and drafts resulting from the lateral loads. The steel frame system with truss belt and hinged bracing is one of the innovative and new systems in long structures, which use a significant reduction in the amount of steel used and the cost of building a tall building.
Relevant answer
Answer
Bracing system or truss belt systems are used in high rise building to resist lateral loads due to wind or earthquake loads. The truss belt system consist of almost two floor levels given truss type structure either at outer core or central core of the structure thereby increasing the stiffness of the structure at this level and reducing the lateral deflections. These truss belts can be provided at some levels of buildings.
  • asked a question related to Braces
Question
3 answers
For a Structure say 15 meters high, 12 meters long and 12 meters wide and has 200mm*100mm I-section column with lateral bracing. The stages should include things such as concrete footing casting and curing, steel material preparation, time for connecting each steel members, installation of roof truss etc. and the help i am seeking is name of each stages duration, each stages take.
Relevant answer
Answer
Following answers
  • asked a question related to Braces
Question
8 answers
I am doing a project on buckling restrained braces in SAP2000. Hope you could help me how to model a BRB in SAP2000?
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Siddiq Shaik
For modeling BRB in Sap 2000 software, first of all you should model the structure in Etabs 2016 which has StarseismicBRB sections. Then using this prepared sections, you can model BRBs in Sap 2000 using "Link properties".
  • asked a question related to Braces
Question
4 answers
Lately i have been reading a lot of papers about BRB and their optimum configuration, but i can´t seem to find an article which demonstrate the concept.
I'm hoping someone can point me in the right direction.
I'm will appreciate a lot any help!!
  • asked a question related to Braces
Question
6 answers
sometimes there is problems with compliance for the FAB after Ponseti. so is there any alternative of FAB. any suggesssions, ideas
Relevant answer
Answer
work is still going on to compare various FABs after Ponseti treatment. But the FAB still remains the answer to averting relapse after treatment
  • asked a question related to Braces
Question
3 answers
Can anyone suggest papers or any source where I can find experimental results of cyclic loading test of concentrically braced frames with X bracings and I sections as braces?
Relevant answer
Answer
  • asked a question related to Braces
Question
3 answers
Instead of modelling a BRB using the nonlinear link option, can it be modeled using a frame elements with cross sectional dimensions so as to produce the same elastic stiffness and with an axial plastic hinge? I will be doing a nonlinear time history analysis of a braced frame with BRB. I have assigned flexural plastic hinges at the ends of the beam and columns to study their damages if any.
  • asked a question related to Braces
Question
1 answer
Will brace or orthosis usage improve cosmetic result after resection of rib hump? In case of idiopathic scoliosis surgery with multilevel fusion, apical derotation and thoracoplasty. Do you have expirience of using brace after same surgery in adult patients (about 40 y.o.)? What type of brace or orthosis do you use?
Relevant answer
Answer
Yes I brace for 3 month in severe rigid scoiliosis, growth rods.
  • asked a question related to Braces
Question
3 answers
I am working on modeling the dynamic response of a steel brace frame by applying ground motion acceleration using ABAQUS. For the most part, the response that is observed makes sense. However, at points where the braces rapidly go from yielding in tension to a compression state, unexpected results are observed. At this points, the brace's axial load exceeds the expected buckling load by as much as 2 times.
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Mr. Cano,
It is a rather interesting phenomenon which we recently studied in the following paper:
I believe it is in fact the mass of the brace which is causing this. When a brace is subjected to rapid shortening, due to the inertia effect of the brace’s mass, it will take a certain amount of time for the member to deflect laterally and buckle, and within this time period, the axial force of the brace can exceed its static buckling load significantly. This can be called dynamic overshoot, as it has been in the above paper.
Must also mention that, the lack of imperfection as a result of "too much stretching under tension" can also cause a similar effect, however, the behavior would be somewhat different.
You may run your exact same model with "massless braces" to see if the overshoots disappear. If yes, it means that the reason for the high compressive forces is dynamic overshoot. Nevertheless, don't forget that such dynamic overshoots are a part of the "actual" behavior of a brace member.
Hope this helps.
Best regards,
Sina
  • asked a question related to Braces
Question
5 answers
i have 4 storey SCBF in which i have to give to properties of brace section as round HSS elements in opensees.
can anyone help me with the command to give section properties
Relevant answer
  • asked a question related to Braces
Question
1 answer
i have 4 storey SCBF. I want to analyse it by opensees. It has chevron brace in middle bay
Relevant answer
Answer
following ....
  • asked a question related to Braces
Question
5 answers
I am currently modelling 15 storey steel structure of moment resisting frame, X bracing and V bracing in ETABS to generate the the fragility curve of these structures. I am not sure how it is possible to check that structure going to fail, therefore I came up with the idea that add plastic hinges to my beams and column to find out if structure withstand with conditions I provided
Relevant answer
  • asked a question related to Braces
Question
7 answers
I am trying to do a time history analysis of a Buckling Restrained Braced Frame (BRBF) using SAP2000. For time history analysis SAP2000 provides two options namely modal i.e. Fast Non Linear Analysis (FNA) and Direct Integration. I am in a dilemma regarding which one to use for the analysis. On one hand, CSI Knowledge Base claims FNA to be "generally more accurate and efficient than direct-integration time-history analysis" and on the other, on another page for Hinge FAQ it says that "FNA is based upon the mode-superposition method, intended for primarily linear-elastic systems which may have a limited number of predefined nonlinear elements."
Now I find these statements to be quite ambiguous.
Also I have analysed the same frame employing both the methods, thereby getting different results. Please help.
Relevant answer
Answer
FNA is faster (hence efficient), but only accurate for a specific range of problems - for example simple material non-linearity modeled via concentrated plasticity.
If you are introducing any other type of non-linearity (such as geometric) or more realistic (therefore more complicated) hysteretic rules you should perform direct integration.
  • asked a question related to Braces
Question
9 answers
We have 4 frames including intermediate steel moment frames, special steel moment frames,braced steel frames and concrete moment frames, which are designed based on the current seismic design codes. which one of theme has more strength and stiffness degradation under seismic loads?
thanks for your answers.
Relevant answer
Answer
The steel bracing systems have different responses according the type of bracing such as SCBF, EBF and BRBF. But generally the bracing systems have less stiffness and strength degradation in comparison to steel moment frames. You may refer to Ductile Design of Steel Structures by M. Bruneau for further information.
As far as the seismically designed steel and reinforced concrete frames are compared, the steel moment frame has more strength degradation due to the formation of local buckling of flanges, while the RC moment frames has more stiffness degradation due to the crack and yielding of rebars in tension zone. You may refer to Seismic Design of Reinforced and Precast Concrete Buildings by Robert E. Englekirk.
  • asked a question related to Braces
Question
3 answers
What is your opinion regarding using a seismic proofing system such as fluid brace damper or base isolator for residential house either single story or and apartments?
I'm a student researching about damper application in small scale project such as residential house
Relevant answer
Answer
Technically it is feasible but economically nonfeasible
  • asked a question related to Braces
Question
3 answers
Skeletal trauma leads to pain and discomforting positioning often with cumbersome braces/splints/plaster etc. How it affects sleep quality. That might also be contributing to various I'll effects in future.
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi Ganesh. Please look at this article
Shulman BS1, Liporace FA, Davidovitch RI, Karia R, Egol KA. Sleep disturbance after fracture is related to emotional well-being rather than functional result.
J Orthop Trauma. 2015 Mar;29(3):e146-50. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000217.
Kind Regards
Fabian
  • asked a question related to Braces
Question
7 answers
I was recently trying to model a BRB using SAP2000 by defining axial plastic hinges at either ends of the brace. But the problem that I am facing while doing pushover analysis is that the brace is buckling in compression and hence achieving much lower axial strength than what it is having in tension. I have also referred to the paper : Karimi, M. R. B., Yaghin, M. A. L., Nezhad, R. M., Sadeghi, V., & Aghabalaie, M. (2015). Seismic Behavior of Steel Structure with Buckling-Restrained Braces. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, International Journal of Civil, Environmental, Structural, Construction and Architectural Engineering, 9(4), 488-496. But could not solve the issue. Can anyone help?
Relevant answer
Answer
If you are performing nonlinear analysis with sap2000, you should uncheck the option "P-delta" or "P-delta plus large displacements" in analysis settings. In this way, second order effects are not considered in the entire model, including braces.
Differently, if you want to include buckling of other members, such as columns, you can modify the inertia moduli of the section assigned to the brace. In this way, elastic buckling is avoided and in non linear branch it will follow the rule of the plastic hinge.
  • asked a question related to Braces
Question
8 answers
in the PhD thesis (Tremblay, 1993), it is presented a brace frame that dissipate energy through friction instead of yielding and buckling, but in the literature such as in the book " Principles of Passive Supplemental Damping and Seismic Isolation" it is presented as a friction damper.
Relevant answer
Answer
The system has been implemented in a number of buildings in Mexico and very likely elsewhere. The affiliation of the authors of the attached paper (in Spanish) could give you some more hints. The paper itself also contains details of how the system works.
  • asked a question related to Braces
Question
1 answer
I tried shear hinge using FEMA 356 table parameters but my calibration with actual test experiment is off for cyclic loading. If I am concerned about nonlinear shear behavior of my member, still P-M3 Fiber hinge would work? I believe it takes shear behavior elastically if we assign fiber hinge. I tried this as well and assigned a moment - rotation curve but it its not calibrating. For example, if I am looking at shear link member in eccentrically braced frame. Do you have a recommendation to get good hysteresis using particular type of hinge in SAP 2000?
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Ahmad,
If you concern about the shear behaviour of your element, I am afraid that you should not use the P-M3 fiber because it only allows plastic hinge to be formed under bending action whereas the shear constitutive is remain elastic. Based on my experience, I would suggest you to use the link-type element such as Plastic Wen type that you can later fit with your experimental data by adjusting the post-yield stiffness, yield strength and the smoothness of the curve. With link element, you can easily define the local degree of freedom (DOF) in which your shear forces can reach the plastic capacity. Please remember to use either non-linear static analysis (pushover) or dynamic time history analysis if you want to get the hysteresis curve of your element. The hysteresis won't show up if you only conduct linear analysis of course. Hope it helps!
Best regards,
Andri Setiawan
  • asked a question related to Braces
Question
1 answer
How can model the fracture of braced frames  in opensees by the picture attached?
I want to assign the fracture model in Fig.7 to the green and blue spring
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Mojtaba
Hi
According to figure, I suggest using pinching4 or hysteretic material; But I don't try to model it.
  • asked a question related to Braces
Question
3 answers
I try to model the BRB in ABAQUS, and I now I get the results, but the hysteretic curve just looks like that of ordinary brace since the brace buckles when compressed. Do anyone know why? In the model, I use the surface to surface to represent the interaction between the core and the restrained segment,and when I use frictionless model the curve looks good while I use friction model with coefficient of 0.05, the curve implies that brace buckle when compressed. And I do not figure out why. Can anyone do me a favor to work this out? Of course, possibilities that many problems with my model needed to solve exist.
Relevant answer
Answer
I agree with  Gonzalo Torrisi.
  • asked a question related to Braces
Question
6 answers
hello, am trying to model a braced frame which has columns and beams of shell elements(s4R) and the brace as a truss element(T3D2),  how can i connect them with a pinned condition at the end of the brace?
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Poorna, 
Please open the attached link which may be a solution to your problem.
Regards
  • asked a question related to Braces
Question
3 answers
Present is a 6 mm overbite with one top incisor rotated due to overcrowding.  Bottom incisors are also overcrowded.  The mandibular arch has a deep curve of Spee.  No cross bite.  Currently using Damon III braces top an bottom with class iii elastic.
Relevant answer
Answer
A) Deep bite is one of the most common malocclusion seen in children as well as adults that can occur along with other associated malocclusions. ‫It is said to be one of the most deleterious malocclusion when considered from the viewpoint of the future health of the masticatory apparatus and the dental units. There are two types of deep bite: incomplete and complete deep bite.
If not treated, deep bites can result in: TRAUMA to the palatal mucosa, behind the upper incisors or to the labial gingiva of the lower incisors. This can result in painful soft tissue and periodontal defects overbites greater than 40% as excessive, compromising the periodontal tissues and acting as a co-contributing factor in the aetiology of TMD. Excessive ATTRITION of anterior teeth, especially lower incisors, is often associated with a deep anterior overbite and Bruxism.
Orthodontic treatment mechanics to correct a deep bite must be specific for: the TYPE of deep bite and ETIOLOGICAL FACTORS identified in the diagnosis for each individual patient; the amount of GROWTH remaining also affects treatment decisions and modalities. Deep bite corrections achieved during periods of active growth have been found to be more stable than those in adult patients
Treatment modalities include:
1. Intrusion of upper and/or lower incisors
2. Extrusion of upper and/or lower posterior teeth
3. A combination of anterior intrusion and posterior extrusion
4. Proclination of incisors
5. Adult surgery
The successful treatment of deep bite correction depends on an elaborate clinical examination, thorough cephalometric analysis, and judicious treatment planning among the various available options and by- using appropriate mechanotherapy followed by a proper retention protocol.
REMOVABLE APPLIANCES- The anterior bite plane is a modified Hawley’s appliance with a flat ledge of acrylic behind the upper incisors. The anterior bite plane consist of 1) Adam’s clasps on the molars (help in retaining the appliance) 2) A labial bow (counter any forward movement of incisors) 3) Base plate with anterior bite plane (1.5 – 2 mm) - As the posterior teeth erupt the height of the bite plane is gradually increased.
Fixed appliances 1) Use of anchorage bends: given in the arch wire mesial to the molar tubes (the anterior part of the arch wire lies gingival to bracket slot)2) Use of arch wires with reverse curve of Spee. 3) Use of utility arches: Utility arches are arch wires that are bent in such a way that they bypass the buccal segment & are engaged on the incisors (activated by giving a V bend in the buccal segment of the wire.
If we want to achieve the desired rotation of maxillary incisor while correcting the deep bite, we can incorporate Z spring along with the anterior bite plane.
  • asked a question related to Braces