Book Industry - Science topic

In my opinion this approach is true. Because short size texts are more attractive for people, due to the fact that they can consider that they will read it in a few minutes and understand easily. Actually, to produce short and understandable texts in academy is not that simple ( because we want to write everything clearly ) , readers and researchers need this type of readings.

Alexander would you like to hire money.

This continuum would certainly apply to psychology. There is some use of mathematical models and a great deal of methodology applied in some cases but there are many non-quantitative hypotheses only tested statistically. Sometimes the concepts employed in these studies are not clearly defined. Worse still the sampling of subjects is opportunistic and stimuli are often selected on an ad hoc basis. Mostly it is not tight (hard) science.

I am not sure whether sociology should be included in the discussion of science, in which case you need to go beyond soft to hairy. I have met quality material but innumeracy and and lack of clarity are all too common features of the thinking found here.

Noura Jabbar If you plan to build a library with various books, you will need a free GitHub account and minimal knowledge about markdown. Still, this last one is optional because there is also a WYSIWYG editor at your disposal. Good luck!

Al-Sukkariya is a novel written by the Egyptian writer Naguib Mahfouz, and it is the third part of Naguib Mahfouz's trilogy, for which he was awarded the Nobel Prize in Literature in 1988. Al-Sukaria is the name of a neighborhood in Cairo, and it is the neighborhood in which most of the events of the novel take place. The events of this part begin eight years after the end of the events of the previous part, i.e. in 1934, and end in 1943.

Scientific books are collections of chapters=reviews. Standalone reviews are better in terms of dissemination. But the words "book" and "chapter" are magic spells. So every sincere academic-ladder climber wants to have a chapter or two in their lists of publications. Books are usually not "open access," but they are often "open, sesame."

I think you can include in your CV with a note that it has been reprinted.

One my recent books was written in Lotus WordPro, then converted to Adobe PDF and MSWord. It was copyedited in Wales, typeset in India, printed in Singapore, and published in England. When I read the printed book against the copyedited manuscript, I was aghast. So many errors that I couldn't count them all. Spaces were eliminated, resulting in gibberish word combinations; uppercase letters were reduced to lower case, and vice versa; etc., etc., etc.

Digital handling of texts was supposed to improve the whole process, but in my experience, the opposite is true.

We seem to have a language barrier issue here - I certainly did not indicate that the revenue was the same, I said that the percentage was the same. To wit, if your book sells for $6, you get 60 cents on a 10% scheme, and if it sells for $30, then you get $3: the revenue is clearly not the same, but the contracted % worth is wholly unaffected.

I'm not clear as to why you'd sprinkle an English language text with misleading foreign-language words ? Maybe if you happen to not know a word a less misleading way would be to look it up rather than using a foreign word without forewarning or explanation....

Your issue in d) must be addressed beforehand in the contract you write. Self-publishing would of course leave you with a higher percentage, but self-publishing, especially in science, is usually not a good idea; maybe the fees you leave to the publishing house can be deemed as your recognition of the true service they provide in enhancing your exposure. No one will ever read , let alone review, a self-published science book, because of all the Dunning Kruger's out there who self-publish.