Science topic

Bacterial Biofilm - Science topic

Explore the latest questions and answers in Bacterial Biofilm, and find Bacterial Biofilm experts.
Questions related to Bacterial Biofilm
  • asked a question related to Bacterial Biofilm
Question
1 answer
Fibra cel discs are carriers used for adherant mammalian and insect cells during fermentations. Can someone give me an example or refer publications where the same material have been used for e coli or bacterial biofilms instead ? Also, any suggestions on how this system can be applied in fermentor (glass) would be appreciated.I am attaching the link for referring the material i am stating about:
Relevant answer
Answer
I don't know about "Fibra cel disks" specifically, but the concept of solid "carriers" is very common in wastewater treatment using bacteria. So is "solid phase fermentation. E. coli could be an issue, as many lab strains were developed for planktonic growth :-(
More from Perplexity.AI
  • asked a question related to Bacterial Biofilm
Question
6 answers
For qualitative analysis of gram-negative bacterial biofilm. What is the ideal stain that we can go with? I have tried CV, it gives good images but not good compared to gram-positive ones. It gets washed during washing steps. On searching I got Safranin and other alternatives. If anyone has used this. Please share your experience
Relevant answer
Answer
If your expectation is to qualitatively observe biofilm formation congo red is ideal
  • asked a question related to Bacterial Biofilm
Question
4 answers
Storage and maintenance of pathogens is a costly and time-consuming affair, the recent study indicated that most of the pathogenic bacteria can be stored for several months at room temperature in sterile tap water without any hustle.
Ref DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.34672.84480
Relevant answer
Answer
No, it is not recommended to use sterile tap water to store pathogens in a microbiology laboratory. Water, even if sterile, can easily become contaminated, and some pathogens can survive and grow in water environments. Water may not provide the necessary conditions for preserving pathogens effectively. It is better to use specialized media or culture media designed for pathogen storage. Following established laboratory protocols and guidelines is important for sample safety and integrity.
  • asked a question related to Bacterial Biofilm
Question
2 answers
have any of you come across articles on the protection of carbon steels by bacterial biofilms? can anyone help me please?
Relevant answer
Answer
Thank's for your answer M.Phil Geis
  • asked a question related to Bacterial Biofilm
Question
2 answers
I am interested to know if there is a difference in the bacterial biofilm compositions between:
1. cool and warmer seas
2. on different surfaces
Is anyone here investigating this and would like to collaborate?
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi David, we are doing quite a bit of work in this field and are just down the road from you:) Very happy to have a chat. We're also collaborating on a new ARC Biofilm training centre. Just get in touch. Scott
  • asked a question related to Bacterial Biofilm
Question
1 answer
N-glycanase
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Dadimi,
Mix the samples with N-glycanase (10 µg/mL) and/or dispersin B (20 µg/mL). Incubate the mixture at 37°C for 30 min. Because the composition of extracellular polysaccharides in biofilm matrix varies between different bacterial strains, the ideal enzyme for degrading polysaccharides likely differs according to the strain studied. Of the bacterial strains tested in our laboratory, N-glycanase works well for eDNA extraction from the biofilm matrix developed by Escherichia coli K12 and Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923, and dispersin B is effective on biofilms from Stenotrophomonas maltophilia and Acinetobacter baylyi AC811. For eDNA extraction from mixed species biofilms or environmental biofilms, a mixture of both enzymes may be used.
  • You can multiply the concentration in micrograms per milliliter by the conversion factor to obtain the concentration in units.
  • Typically, N-glycanase is used at concentrations between 0.1 and 1 unit per milligram of biofilm biomass. However, the optimal concentration may vary depending on the biofilm composition and other factors. It is advisable to start with a lower concentration and adjust accordingly based on the obtained results.
I hope this answer proves helpful to you. Best of luck with your endeavors!
  • asked a question related to Bacterial Biofilm
Question
10 answers
We are working on Biofilm and Quorum sensing genes of E.coli, we suggest some of reasons maybe:- Contamination, Annealing Temperature, Melting Temperature, DNA Extraction mistakes in the Techniques, we identified them by biochemical tests to be sure the isolates are E.coli, but now we are collecting samples from the beginning and doing the procedure again
Relevant answer
Answer
There could be several possible reasons why no bands are observed in the PCR amplification of 16S rRNA of E.coli genes:
  1. Contamination: Contamination with other organisms, DNA, or PCR reagents can lead to false-negative results. Make sure that your reagents are free from contamination and that you use appropriate precautions to avoid contamination during the entire PCR process.
  2. Annealing temperature: The annealing temperature of the primers may be too high or too low, which can lead to poor amplification or no amplification. You can try adjusting the annealing temperature to optimize the PCR conditions.
  3. Melting temperature: The melting temperature (Tm) of the primers may be too low or too high. If the Tm is too low, the primers may anneal nonspecifically to other regions of the DNA, resulting in no amplification or non-specific amplification. If the Tm is too high, the primers may not anneal to the template DNA, resulting in no amplification. You can try adjusting the Tm to optimize the PCR conditions.
  4. DNA extraction: Mistakes in the DNA extraction process can lead to poor DNA quality, low DNA concentration, or PCR inhibitors in the DNA samples, which can affect PCR amplification. Make sure that you follow a standardized DNA extraction protocol and use appropriate controls to monitor the quality and quantity of DNA samples.
  5. Genetic variation: There is genetic variation among different strains of E.coli, and the 16S rRNA gene sequences may vary among different isolates. Make sure that the primers you are using are appropriate for the E.coli strains you are working with.
  6. PCR conditions: Other PCR conditions, such as the extension time, cycle number, or buffer components, may also affect the PCR amplification. You can try optimizing the PCR conditions to improve the amplification efficiency.
These video playlists might be helpful to you:
  • asked a question related to Bacterial Biofilm
Question
5 answers
I have observed opposite response from gram negative and gram positive bacterial cells on plasma modified polymeric surface in terms of adhesion and biofilm formation.
gram negative cells show above 90% reduction in adhesion and gram positive show only 9% reduction. What could be the reason behind this?
Which property of bacterial cell type might be playing a role?
Please explain.
Thanks in advance.
Relevant answer
Answer
"repel" was your term. the differecne is yours to establish.
  • asked a question related to Bacterial Biofilm
Question
5 answers
I have previously used LB broth medium in biofilm inhibition experiments against P. aeruginosa. However, I could not detect an effective biofilm formation in the negative control wells. Which medium would you recommend for sufficient biofilm formation in P. aeruginosa?
Thank you.
Relevant answer
Answer
Fuat Tüfekci No problem. You can also extend incubation time to 48 or 96 h to get more biofilm.
  • asked a question related to Bacterial Biofilm
Question
4 answers
Hello,
Hope everyone is doing great. I have synthesized an antimicrobial peptide gels. Now I need to perform antibiofilm assay to check its biofilm inhibition potential.
There is this paper I am following. They grew biofilms on silicon wafers modified with gel and then incubation. I don't have silicon wafers.
Could someone please tell me that is there any alternative? Can I grow biofilms in 12-well plate already modified with gels?
Secondly, why they grew biofilms on silicon wafer? Is there any technical aspect related to SEM analysis afterward?
Regards,
Zeeshan
Relevant answer
Answer
Thanks Phil Geis for you response,
I have never thought about this aspect. Well, It really seems natural as it mimics the real life problem in case of biofilm formation on medical equipment and devices.
But when it comes to SEM analysis how are you gonna prepare sample? And incase of silicon wafer, you just cut a small piece and its ready to be analysed along with its surface.
Maybe that is the only reason of establishing biofilms on it.
  • asked a question related to Bacterial Biofilm
Question
5 answers
We are doing a research on Biofilm formation of Bacteria, for knowing each isolate strong, moderate or weak, by calculations tables of Standard deviation, Variance and Cutoff (Ct) etc… and with the help of Microsoft Excel but the results in the program differ from the hand written and don’t know the best way to calculate and compare the results, any help will be very appreciated, Thank you
Ali
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Ali,
There are probably many ways you can differentiate bacterial biofilm formation and I'd suggest either following the procedure described in a research paper working on the species or strains you are interested in, or by using your own criteria. We characterise our air-liquid interface biofilms using a combined biofilm assay measuring biofilm strength, attachment levels and total growth - which means we can describe 'biofilms' using one or all three quantitative measurements. We tend not to use 'no biofilm' control strains, as many biofilm-formers produce such weak and poorly attached structures it is not clear when a 'no biofilm' becomes a measurable one (though we can use a sterile microcosm/culture as the negative control if appropriate).
I can't comment on your problems with Excel, but one simple way is to graph the mean results from your experimental replicates, and divide these into quartiles about the median (i.e., from the minimum values to Q1, from Q1 to the median, from the median to Q3, and from Q3 to the maximum value). You could then simply state that no or poor biofilm formers are min - Q1, biofilm formers are Q1 ≤ Q3, and good biofilm-formers are Q3 - max (if you liked, you could divide your bacteria into no biofilm, poor biofilms, good biofilms and very good biofilms – the number of categories is up to you, but you can't have lots when you have relatively few bacteria to distribute across these categories).
There are statistical tests you could use, and assuming that data (or residuals) are Normally distributed, you could say that no or poor biofilms are not significantly different to a no-biofilm control, etc., but this gets messy because it is hard to know when a very poor biofilm is effectively no biofilm, etc.
Andrew
  • asked a question related to Bacterial Biofilm
Question
5 answers
I am working with e.coli. I need help with interpretation of the results. I have worked with two E.coli strains. I did triplet technical replicates. I need to do statistical T-test.
Below is some of my datta:
Strain 1 0,407 0,544 0,639 Ave.: 0,53
Strain 2 0,384 0,515 0,34 Ave.: 0,413
Negativ control: 0,161 0,181 0,14 Ave.: 0,160667
Can someone help me with this. Please. There are several methods that are available to measure bacterial biofilm adherence. I was told to do a t-test beetween my average negatic control and a strain of E.coli.
PLEASE HELP
Thank you
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi Maryam, are these results of optical densities measuring at 600 nm?
Have you made calibrations of spectrophotometric readings vs. bacterial cell densities prior to the test? These data are necessary for any further statistical analysis.
I would like to recommend the following article:
Corte, L., Casagrande Pierantoni, D., Tascini, C., Roscini, L., & Cardinali, G. (2019). Biofilm specific activity: a measure to quantify microbial biofilm. Microorganisms, 7(3), 73.
  • asked a question related to Bacterial Biofilm
Question
4 answers
I am currently investigating biofilm formation in Salmonella isolates using 96-well crystal violet assays. The protocol I follow utilizes multichannel pipettes (opposed to other rinsing and removal methods I have read about others using). From 1:100 diluted overnight broth plates are inoculated and incubated (at various temperatures), broths are removed after and wells are washed using MQH2O until clear. I then stain using 0.1% CV for approx. 15mins (using a higher volume than the broth; e.g. 100ul broth and 125ul 0.1% CV), then washing wells once more after. after drying for 48h or more I solubilize the dye using 30% acetic acid and record the OD600. when comparing the results to a blank negative control of 30% acetic acid (approx. 0.05 OD600) calculations are showing very high biofilm formation (high OD600 in contrast to the negative control) when the lab isolates are supposed to have for example low formation or even none. I suspect there is insufficient pipetting of planktonic cells/ CV leaving a coating which is skewing OD600 measurements. This issue is consistent across most replicates and temperatures. I would love to hear any insight, thank you.
Relevant answer
Answer
Aaron Turner Hi, I have recently checked biofilm forming ability in E. coli using CV assay. This paper will help you:
  • asked a question related to Bacterial Biofilm
Question
3 answers
Does the sample should be solid for SEM and how to prepare it?
Relevant answer
Answer
no, sorry
  • asked a question related to Bacterial Biofilm
Question
5 answers
On some E coli cells, I see some opening of cell wall as shown in this image. Please guide what is it and why such things happen i.e. under what kind of conditions ?
Relevant answer
Answer
Dead cells, as cell preparation is for electron microscopy
  • asked a question related to Bacterial Biofilm
Question
2 answers
Hello everyone,
I am working on bacterial biofilming activity and was observing the same on glass surface. I have the z-stacks but i am unable to directly calculate the thickness of biofilms under varying growth conditions. Please anyone guide. Dye used was acridine orange.
Relevant answer
Answer
Md Ramim Tanver Rahman thank u for the reply but how to calculate the thickness using which software?
  • asked a question related to Bacterial Biofilm
Question
7 answers
I know the technique which is sub-culturing the bacterial treated with sub-MIC for the specific days like 30 days. I am writing if anyone knows another technique to investigate this?
Relevant answer
Answer
Sorry, I have no such research
  • asked a question related to Bacterial Biofilm
Question
3 answers
We are studying biofilm formation on differently coated 15mm diameter uPVC discs - these are opaque and may be white or black in colour depending on coating. The current setup includes forming biofilms on discs, rinsing to remove non-adherent cells, fixing each disc to a glass slide and then adding a drop of LIVE/DEAD BacLight mixture (Invitrogen L7012) to the centre of the disc. After incubation, the excess stain is rinsed off, a coverslip is placed on top of the disc and the edges of the coverslip fixed to the underlying slide with nail polish. After drying, the whole piece is placed in the inverted microscope coverslip side down. When imaging it is possible to see a hue of green or red depending on filter but not to resolve cells, and it is unclear whether this is just autofluorescence of the disc or coating. The opacity of the discs seems to block much of the light.
Thank you for your assistance and advice.
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi James,
The opacity shouldn't matter since you are illuminating as well as observing from the coverslip side, so neither excitation nor fluorescence need to propagate through the disk. We image biofilms on steel plates in a similar way. Is there water between the coverslip and the PVC disk?
  • asked a question related to Bacterial Biofilm
Question
3 answers
My bacteria sample is Acinetobacter baumannii. I found one protocol just centrifuge and using congo red and check OD 490 nm supernatant. I need more better protocol for extraction EPS with reference.
Relevant answer
Answer
For extraction, you can simply centrifuge & precipitate with ethanol/ acetone. Additionally, you may partially purify it with TCA precipitation to take out the residual proteins. For quantification, you may use Congo red, apart from that alcian blue is also an option.
  • asked a question related to Bacterial Biofilm
Question
9 answers
I would like to know any simple stain or test bu which i could stain or quantify only the EPS or biofilm present and not bacteria present in it.
Relevant answer
Answer
FilmTracer SYPRO Ruby biofilm matrix stain
  • asked a question related to Bacterial Biofilm
Question
8 answers
Dear Researchers:
Greetings! I am interested in learning electron microscopy image analysis of bacterial biofilms, mainly using open-source software. I have been using basic functions and tool available in ImageJ/Fiji. Could please suggest other software and learning tools that are acceptable in peer-reviewed publications? Thank you.
Relevant answer
Answer
Garima Chaturvedi Thank you. I will check that software.
  • asked a question related to Bacterial Biofilm
Question
2 answers
Hello everyone,
I am planning to work on engineered enzymatic quorum quenchers but I am a little bit confused about the selection of quorum quenchers. Which one is the best QQ for gram-negative bacteria?
Relevant answer
  • asked a question related to Bacterial Biofilm
Question
7 answers
Hey,
I want to check my phages against the bacterial biofilm. I have read papers in which they have added phages in a specific MOI (0.6, 1 etc) either in pretreatment or post treatment of phage infection.
I have a question if cfu/ml of bacteria is1×10^12, it means 1ml of bacterial culture contains 10^12 viable cells. MOI will be calculated accordingly. I don't know the no. of bacterial cells in 100 or 150ul.
How much volume of bacterial culture do you pipette in 96 well microtiter plate? I'm a bit confused as 200ul is the total volume you can pour in 1 well of 96 microtiter plate. How to maintain a specific MOI in each well of microtiter plate?
Relevant answer
Answer
Reduction of CFU may or may not have any correlation with biofilm reduction, it all depends upon the protocol you are using as to whether you are really reducing biofilm or merely reducing planktonic cells.
  • asked a question related to Bacterial Biofilm
Question
3 answers
How can i get nonsporulating bacterial bacillus subtillis strain Δ spoIIE without antibiotic growth conditions ?
This ΔspoIIE::erm strain is showing growth conditions with antibiotic erythromycin , but I need wildtype Δ spoIIE without antibiotic growth conditions. Can I order only Δ spoIIE strains if yes then please suggest.
Relevant answer
Answer
  • asked a question related to Bacterial Biofilm
Question
17 answers
I have recently carried out the Minimum biofilm inhibition concentration (MBIC) on my compound and the value for MBIC is higher than the MIC values for two compounds and MBIC value lower than MIC for another two compounds tested. Is it normal? or should the MBIC value be similar as MIC value?
Relevant answer
Answer
I agree with Seeiki
  • asked a question related to Bacterial Biofilm
Question
3 answers
According to the Baier minima, surfaces having critical surface tensions between 20-30 mN/m are considered as foul release surfaces. PDMS or silicone material falls under this range according to literature then why silicone catheter surface allows biofilm formation on to it ?
Relevant answer
Answer
I suggest that you read these two papers:
DOI: 10.22203/eCM.v0S0u7rfaa0c6e p
They show that the situation, especially in a biological setting, is much more complex than surface tension or Baier minima. Silicone is always coated with a host - derived protein / glycopeptide conditioning film when inserted into the body, and this completely alters the surface characteristics. In addition, in vitro without the conditioning film, some bacteria possess binding proteins that can attach to native silicone, eg vitronectin - binding protein.
  • asked a question related to Bacterial Biofilm
Question
34 answers
I know it is more or less a philosophical question, however quite intriquing. Bacterial cells on agar plate adhere to surface and majority of cells is covered by slime layers. Thus it matches the biofilm definition, however I haven't heard anyone who would define "agar" colonies such way.
Relevant answer
Answer
I agree, a very good question. I myself have been using colonies grown directly on agar plates and referring to them as colony biofilms. Note these are different to those that Phil Stewart introduced by growing on filter papers and transferring them to refresh nutrients or to add a treatment in the underlying agar. Phil used these for measuring antibiotic transport and also physiological heterogeneity by sectioning.
I dont have an answer, I guess it is for the community to decide on the strict definition of what constitutes a biofilm. So lets look at how these direct agar colony or filer colony biofilms are similar or differ from those more conventional biofilms grown under a bulk liquid on a solid surface. In no particular order and off the top of my head. Apologies for research I might have left out which refute or support these arguments:
Similarities
1) High cell density.
2) Gradients of metabolic activity.
3) Tolerance to antibiotics.
4) Persister populations - but planktonic culture do as well.
Differences
1) Solid vs gel substratum - well arguably agar gels look more like epithelium, endothelium, mucosal membranes or tissue than glass, metal, etc. So here it is important to consider the system being modelled.
2) And for me the biggest difference - an overlying water or air bulk fluid. In water daughter cells and dispersed cells can be released to the bulk fluid and washed away so only those truly attached cells remain. In air dispersed cells can just pile up and so those cultures have both "planktonic" and biofilm type cells.
-plate type cultures can have zero or minimal shear stress by the overlying fluid thiose biofilms grown under liquid can be done so with shear stress.
3) Shear stress - while both agar colonies and unstirred well=
Undecided
1) EPS - still under consideration but a recent thought provoking paper by Hoiby and the Danish group showed that an agar plate culture transitioned to a biofilm phenotype after a certain number of hours - thus defining the zone of inhibition.
2) Cell signaling - Im not sure if there are data on this but it is hard to imagine that cell signaling would not be occurring in these communities as it does in dense planktonic cultures and in conventional biofilms.
3) Closed vs open system - some degree of nutrient depletion and replenishment is usual in the real world. In both agar plate and submerged biofilms nutrient / metabolite exchange can be designed in (Stewart filter colony biofilm, or for liquid submerged biofilms continuous culture reactor or sequential batch (i.e. periodic nutrient exchange).
So my thinking of a response (not an answer) to a very interesting question. Discussions??
  • asked a question related to Bacterial Biofilm
Question
4 answers
As part of a research project i have obtained plant root samples that are currently frozen. I need to isolate bacterial DNA from the plant root, however i first need to remove the possible bacterial biofilm from the plant root as the bacterial DNA is of interest, not plant root DNA.
Any advice would be greatly appreciated
Relevant answer
Answer
I agree with Debapriya Sarkar in this question but you can also use some commercially available kits, e.g., FastPrep DNA isolation kit for bacteria
  • asked a question related to Bacterial Biofilm
Question
3 answers
Using LB broth, overnight, shaking, Polystyrene 96 wells.
I would like to use E.coli ATCC 25922 as a positive control for a CV assay, but I have not had much luck reproducing published example values. I bought a lyophilized E.coli. I am using LB broth, overnight/24 hr, 1:100 dilution of overnight preparation, shaking/not shaking, and measuring at 570 nm. My values are 0.1 to 0.2, but published papers are getting >1 using similar conditions that I am using. I have better results with PVC plates, but that shouldn't make a difference. Thanks
Relevant answer
Answer
Is this strain of E. coli K12 MG1655 is pathogenic type bacteria?
  • asked a question related to Bacterial Biofilm
Question
8 answers
Why is there a greenish metallic sheen to E coli colonies in EMB agar?
Relevant answer
Answer
Binsy Mathew green sheen is produced by a chemical compound formed by the pH changes in the media. When the pH is sufficiently lower (4.9 or below), eosin and methylene blue join by covalent bond results in EMB complex which appear green sheen. you can find more details in the following link.
  • asked a question related to Bacterial Biofilm
Question
3 answers
Dear all,
most of the research papers that I found about QS agents described their activity in the inhibition of biofilm formation. I found some manuscripts that demonstrated their potential at different biofilm stages (e.g. https://aac.asm.org/content/aac/59/4/2265.full.pdf ). But I still do not know/understand exactly how QS agents can disrupt or at least have impact against preformed biofilms.
Relevant answer
Answer
To my knowledge there are no such anti-QS agents that disperse the existing biofilm mass .
Best
  • asked a question related to Bacterial Biofilm
Question
9 answers
I am trying to quantify the biofilm formed by a Pseudomonas species grown on a cellulose membrane. What is the best solution to use to solubilize the dye? SDS or acetic acid or ethanol? Also, how can I transfer the solubilized dye from the membrane to a 96-well microtiter plate to measure the OD?
Relevant answer
Answer
I know this is a rather old thread, but for anyone else looking for info on this, we use 0.1% SDS in diH2O to solubilize crystal violet used to stain our cancer cells in 24-well plates. The dye goes into solution almost instantaneously, and it is not subject to rapid evaporation as with EtOH (or odorous like acetic acid).
  • asked a question related to Bacterial Biofilm
Question
5 answers
I'm working on different paan leaf which is known as Piper betle. Different types/ varieties of this leaf found in my country. Therefore, I need to know if the scientific name remain same for all types of Piper betle found ot its change due to geographical and phenotypic variation.
Relevant answer
Answer
Yes, All Paan varieties have one scientific name "Piper betle L. "
  • asked a question related to Bacterial Biofilm
Question
6 answers
Can biofilms be seen by pathologists when they do lab studies? For example, if a human has a biofilm in their colon and does a colonoscopy with biopsies sent to the pathologist, could the doctor doing the scope and/or the pathologist reviewing the biopsy actually be able to identify the biofilm? Or is the biofilm too microscopic for even today's advanced imaging.
Relevant answer
Answer
not all bacterial may be see in slides , but in general we can see the bacterial colonies in infected tissue section, especially in severe bacterial infection
  • asked a question related to Bacterial Biofilm
Question
1 answer
Viruses can't replicate without host, and the so-called in-vitro virus culture actually cultures virus on bacterial biofilm or embryos. would viruses not replicate even if they are presented in a medium with enough ribosome, enzyme, DNA, RNA etc, without any pre-existing "life"? I am asking this as a materials science student, about viability of virus replication in presence of suitable biomaterials,biomolecules and nutrients , without life. How virus detects whether the biochemicals they are using is from "alive" or "dead" host? can that pathway be genetically tweaked?
Relevant answer
Answer
Any form of life that can replicate in vitro, i.e. without a host, is by definition not a virus.
  • asked a question related to Bacterial Biofilm
Question
5 answers
In some articles, the authors reported that, MIC of antimicrobial agent have an ability to disrupt the bacterial biofilms. How it will happen? In general, biofilms are group of bacteria more strong than single cells. Then how this MIC of antimicrobial agent will work against bacterial biofilms?
Relevant answer
Hello madam also you expert this work. you know everything. you r asking question what?
  • asked a question related to Bacterial Biofilm
Question
5 answers
I am currently performing biofilm studies using the Calgary device (96-well plate with peg lid) and a non-motile bacterial species (S. aureus) but am having difficulty forming biofilms on the pegs.
I'm considering adding a few parameters to try promote adherence and biofilm growth, but first wanted to know if it is possible considering the bacterial motility?
Or should I opt for growing the biofilms within the wells rather than on the pegs?
Thanks!
Relevant answer
Answer
It shall be worth to attempt the formation of biofilms on both peg and well-surfaces to find out the actual preference of the organism to create such niche. Streptococcus mutans does form biofilm/ plaque formation on teeth and is nonmotile. Adherence may be modulated/ promoted by pre-exposure of the surface with sterile solution of some sugars [dextrose, sucrose etc.], amino acids [Lysine] and ECM [Collagen, fibronectin, albumin etc.].
  • asked a question related to Bacterial Biofilm
Question
3 answers
Hello everybody, we are working on the eradication of Helicobacter pylori and inhibition of its biofilm. We are looking for the suggestions that what compounds would be better to use against H. pylori to inhibit the quorum sensing.
Relevant answer
Answer
Enzymes like lactonases, acylases which target the AHLs, various oxidoreductases, use of antibiotics, synthetic molecules that sequester the signal can be used. (Interference With Quorum-Sensing Signal Biosynthesis as a Promising Therapeutic Strategy Against Multidrug-Resistant Pathogens by Martinez et al., 2019)
Also some methanol extracts of roots of Albiza schimperiana (ASRM), Solanum torvum and petroleum ether extract of seed of Justica schimperiana (JSSP) and many more have been used and good results have been seen.
  • asked a question related to Bacterial Biofilm
Question
3 answers
Any specific easy method form biofilm formation on cell lines followed by anti-biofilm activity of any oil-based compund
Relevant answer
Answer
The video in the given link will be helpful:
  • asked a question related to Bacterial Biofilm
Question
6 answers
In recent years, the most of researchers and interesting ones in the field of microbial biofilm documented that nano particles like silver, metal ions play a significant role in biofilm approach.
Here i would like to concentrate a light on the modern technique in biofilm and the role of nanotechnology in combating medical resistant microbial infection.
  • asked a question related to Bacterial Biofilm
Question
11 answers
I want 1000 bacteria (numbers) to begin my experiments .How will i get these numbers? Any specific methods? please give suggestions.
Relevant answer
Answer
Hello, believe me if any possibility available for receiving exact numbers you will Hello, believe me, if there was any possibility available for receiving exact numbers, you saw the exact numbers in all Certified Reference Materials for microbiology. So we all talking about approximal numbers, nothing else..
  • asked a question related to Bacterial Biofilm
Question
3 answers
My team is currently studying bacterial biofilms, but have had trouble getting our strain of E. coli to form strong biofilms. We're currently using E. coli 25922 (I believe) growing in M9 media. We're using 24 and 96 well flat bottom plates. Plates are tissue culture treated non-pyrogenic polystyrene.
After some deliberation with my team and research professor we've decided to try a new strain of E. coli for our experiment. I was hoping to get some input about what strains are superior biofilm formers?
Relevant answer
Answer
Stain K12 is very much pathogenic but you can use other strains to do that
  • asked a question related to Bacterial Biofilm
Question
3 answers
I would like to analysis the S. aureus biofilms to know the effect of certain quorum sensing inhibitor on ultra structure. Could someone elaborate the method to prepare sample for TEM analysis (Fixation, dehydration, drying, staining, embedding, ultra sections etc)? Many thanks for your valuable time and help
Relevant answer
Answer
The best results can be achieved with high-pressure freezing, freeze substitution and flat embedding.
Good luck!
  • asked a question related to Bacterial Biofilm
Question
8 answers
When catheter is inserted in to the bladder, fibrinogen gets deposited on to catheter surface and that becomes favorable site for bacteria to grow.
I want to understand from where and why (due to which forces or mechanism or reason) this fibrinogen gets deposited on to catheter surface ?
Relevant answer
Answer
Mustapha Umar: logic answer
  • asked a question related to Bacterial Biofilm
Question
21 answers
I am trying to culture P. aeruginosa (PAO1) biofilms in 96-well plates. I have tried pipetting off the media, wicking it up with blotting paper or tapping it out. All of these methods results in severe disruption of the mucoid growth.
Can anyone advise on a successful method for removing the media, leaving just the biofilm?
Many thanks
Relevant answer
Answer
Another good way might be a microscope slide in a 50 mL centrifuge tube. If you don't mind going to the large volumes required for these (usually I use 25 mL). The other good thing about these is the ability to transfer the slide to a new tube with fresh media. This allows growth over multiple days/week without completely starving the biofilm. I do grow these with rocking (usually a shaker set to 100 rpm).
I actually have 50 of these tubes going right now with PAO1 and it is giving some really robust biofilms on the slides.
You can also try this method with the 24 well plate and use small plastic/glass cover slips. It seems to work but it depends on what you want to do with the biofilm or how high throughput you need it to be.
  • asked a question related to Bacterial Biofilm
Question
18 answers
Kindly assist me with a probable method that i can use to deduce biofilm formation in the general environment/ natural habitant- aquatic biofilms and also biofilms responsible for biological fouling.
Relevant answer
Answer
You may use crystal violet binding assay. It is the most commonly used method for the enumeration of adhered cells.
  • asked a question related to Bacterial Biofilm
Question
8 answers
For those connected with the ICU settings : Do you routinely send tips of removed central lines for culture?
Is identification of the biofilm from these lines helping?
Relevant answer
Answer
As per CDC- Catheter tip cultures have been shown to have higher rates of contamination than blood cultures. Furthermore, not all laboratories are able to perform quantified catheter tip cultures. Catheter tips are a part of other types of non-NHSN surveillance such as catheter-related BSI (CRBSI) which is generally thought of as a clinical definition, used when diagnosing and treating patients.
I agree with you all to send it in immunocompromised patients, as far as I know this is clinical practice -do we have it in any guidelines or any RCT ?
  • asked a question related to Bacterial Biofilm
Question
3 answers
There are many MSSA Biofilm producing strains such as Rosenbach and ATCC 35556 strains. But I am interested to work on strong Biofilm producing MRSA lab strains. Please share the names of these strains. Thank you.
Relevant answer
Answer
Try mrsa 33591
  • asked a question related to Bacterial Biofilm
Question
3 answers
I read this paper1 by which states specific growth rate of bacteria in biofilm is different than that of planktonic cells. How do I modify the typical BioTimer assay2 to compile with it?
1- A Method for Quantitative Determination of Biofilm Viability. Ken Welch , Yanling Cai and Maria Strømme (2012)
2- BioTimer Assay, a new method for counting Staphylococcus spp. in biofilm without sample manipulation applied to evaluate antibiotic susceptibility of biofilm. Fabrizio Pantanella a, Piera Valenti a, Alessandra Frioni a, Tiziana Natalizi a, Luana Coltella b, Francesca Berlutt (2008)
Relevant answer
Answer
Following
  • asked a question related to Bacterial Biofilm
Question
7 answers
I read this paper on determining the viability of cells by BioTimer assay1 and improvement of the same by another paper 2, but I am still not very clear upon the methodology. Could someone please elaborate on the same? A noble method also works. I need to determine the number of viable bacteria in the biofilm sample.
1- BioTimer Assay, a new method for counting Staphylococcus spp. in biofilm without sample manipulation applied to evaluate antibiotic susceptibility of biofilm. Fabrizio Pantanella a, Piera Valenti a, Alessandra Frioni a, Tiziana Natalizi a, Luana Coltella b, Francesca Berlutt (2008)
2- A Method for Quantitative Determination of Biofilm Viability. Ken Welch , Yanling Cai and Maria Strømme (2012)
Relevant answer
Answer
You can do a live/ dead staining
then microscopy followed by image analysis using ImageJ
  • asked a question related to Bacterial Biofilm
Question
4 answers
Is it because of convience or there is some other reason?
Relevant answer
Answer
If you plot the cfu on the Y-axis, it only goes to suggest that bacteria grow arithmetically, but they don't. They grow logarithmically. That is why you have the log transformation. If you have attempted a plot of cfu against time, you will never have the growth curve that clearly shows the lag, log, stationary, death and survival phases.
  • asked a question related to Bacterial Biofilm
Question
4 answers
My bacterial biofilm tends to aggregate and agglutinate and I want to separate them at physiological temperature (25 - 30 C) in liquid. Any good suggestions of enzymes and preferably with protocols? Thank you all in advance.
Relevant answer
Answer
Following
  • asked a question related to Bacterial Biofilm
Question
6 answers
I'm performing assays on a number of bacterial strains, some of which are capable of forming biofilms.
What effects would a "tissue culture treated" plate and a "non-tissue culture treated" plate have on bacteria suspensions??
Would a TC treated plate cause lower amounts of planktonic cells and/or promote biofilm formation as compared to non-TC treated plates?
Thanks!
Relevant answer
Answer
Hello Kevin. My team compared the biofilms on different brands of 96-wellplates (TC-treated, non-TC-treated), and found that some non-TC-treated plates (super cheap) had the lowest biofilm of the same bacteria. We then concluded that non-biofilm experiments can be used on certain non-TC-treated plates, while biofilm experiments should be used on TC-treated plates.
  • asked a question related to Bacterial Biofilm
Question
3 answers
Does anyone have any experience of imaging bacteria and/or bacterial biofilms using SICM? One cannot find much literature about it but it seems as a good alternative to AFM which, in my experience, does not really work with softer samples.
Any input would be highly appreciated!
Thank you so much!
Relevant answer
Answer
Thank you both!
  • asked a question related to Bacterial Biofilm
Question
9 answers
protocol for biofilm sample preparation for SEM analysis
Relevant answer
Answer
1. The spread microbes on glass slides must dry (recomended dry frrezer) before SEM analysys.
2. If the glass slides are not possible to do SEM in your institute then spread microbes on aluminium foils and dry it and go for SEM.
  • asked a question related to Bacterial Biofilm
Question
4 answers
Biofilm Formation
Biofilm
Acinetobacter baumannii
Microbial Biofilms
Bacterial Biofilm
Relevant answer
Answer
If you are intrested in mature biofilm you can use the classical crystal violet assay, for example see Runchi et al., 2017
If you are interested in the early stages (attachment) see the recent paper by Nimrod Shteindel
  • asked a question related to Bacterial Biofilm
Question
1 answer
I'm looking for a method of coating Biofilm Peg lids (not Innovotech) with Hydroxyapatite. 
I have the HA solution made which works fine to coat a 96 well base plate, however the evaporation/precipitation process does not work to evenly dry down and coat a peg lid (the precipitate sinks to the bottom).
I have tried soaking the pegs in a plate then inverting and drying in an oven at 65.c (any higher melts the peg lid) for 15 min intervals.
Alternatively I'm looking for any basic/simple methods of looking at S. mutans biofilms in vitro in an oral/dental context.
Thanks in advance for your help!
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi Fiona,
This may be helpful.
See Section 2.1.1 of Gail Martin's PhD Thesis entitled 'Development of an orally relevant biofilm disinfection model'.
Regards
  • asked a question related to Bacterial Biofilm
Question
3 answers
Hi!
Does anybody know about other peg lids for biofilm assaying besides the Thermo Scientific Nunc-TSP peg lid?
I'm looking for peg lids or peg "strips", where a row of pegs can be snapped/cut off and used when not having a lot of samples to fill out a whole 96-well plate. - In order to economize the amount of pegs used per experiment.
Relevant answer
Answer
Batch culture of biofilm on peg lids is a versatile method that can be used for microtiter determinations of biofilm antimicrobial susceptibilty. work has been presented detailing a core protocol and set of parameters( surface composition, the of rocking or orbital motion, temperature, cultivation time . inoculum size, atmospheric gases and nutritional that can be adjusted to grow single, or multispecies bioflims on peg surfaces. For details consult Nat. Protoc. 2010, vol. 5( 7 ): 1236 - 54.
  • asked a question related to Bacterial Biofilm
Question
9 answers
I am doing my research project at university Tarbiat Modares , and currently designing a bioreactor for biodegradation of petroleum hydrocarbons, it is somewhat continuous bioreactor.
the aim of the present work is The peroxidase-mediated biodegradation of petroleum hydrocarbons in a H2O2-induced using in-situ production of peroxidase
but i need some help how to choose bioreactor
Any prospective leads and suggestions would be highly appreciated.
Thank you.
Saeed Molaei
Relevant answer
Answer
As stated Faheem, you should start with batch reactor and after optimisation of conditions make a scale-up or work with continous reactors.
regards,
G
  • asked a question related to Bacterial Biofilm
Question
4 answers
I need some papers( both research + review) where plant extracts been used both for both antibacterial and antibifilm candidate.
Secondly, any database of secondary metabolites having antibacterial activities..
Thanks for your co-operation
Relevant answer
Answer
In reality, your question should have sounded like this: so much information exists in PubMed, how can I digest all this? But we again sending you to the search engines like google scholar
  • asked a question related to Bacterial Biofilm
Question
3 answers
I want to know if there is a time or duration that is expected for AOC to change and cause bio-film development on membranes. This question is also applicable to pipelines for water distribution. Although the conditions for these two scenarios may differ due to several factors like material properties (membrane and pipes) and surrounding chemistry
Relevant answer
Answer
AOC means Assimilable Organic Carbon
  • asked a question related to Bacterial Biofilm
Question
4 answers
Hello, I work inducing aggregation of E. coli with polymers, I need to asses the metabolic activity and survivability of my bacteria under different polymers.
I am trying with FDA in DMSO, 5mg/mL. 1ug per every 10^6 cells.
How I am doing is to transfer the bacteria at a OD600=1(in LB, and some washed twice from the media) to 96 well plates, inoculate it with my polymers, then after that (without cooling or anything else) pipette the FDA. After that I analyze the fluorescence at ex:490nm and em:514nm.
Problem is that the fluorescence I am getting is really low, most of my cells should be metabolically active (at least the ones in LB), so I am doing something wrong.
I also have some questions about this assay:
1) Is it suitable to measure activity at different time points, like 2-4-6-8-24 hours? Or just to take a sample and measure at one point then discard the sample?
2) Do I need to get rid of the media?
3) Do I need to cool down the sample?
4) What is the lifespan of the die?
Relevant answer
Answer
José,
As Steve mentions, it is the hydrolysis product of FDA which is the source of fluorescence: fluorescein. The absorption and emission of fluorescein are strongly pH dependent, which may in part explain the response you mention. A useful paper that describes this pH dependence is J. Luminescence 10 [1975] 381-390; it shows how quantum yield varies significantly with pH. [I've been involved in the industrial manufacture of FDA years ago - I echo Steve's point that FDA will hydrolyse to fluorescein in the presence of water: its concentration along with pH and temperature are influences on rate of deacetylation.]
  • asked a question related to Bacterial Biofilm
Question
4 answers
All I am finding is related to bacterial biofilms. I want some way to create it from plant origin.
Relevant answer
A biofilm is a compsortium of unicelullar organism that join and behave as a supracellular one.
What you are asking is that a pluricellular eucariotic organism makes biofilm and this is not possible.
What you can do is to induce plant callus formation by a combination of different hormones.
  • asked a question related to Bacterial Biofilm
Question
10 answers
Crystal Violet is commonly used in the microtitre plate assay to assess biofilm formation. Can any other dye be used instead?
Relevant answer
Answer
There are several methods which additionaly characterize the biofilm formation. One is the CFU /ml of the biofilm cells. In this method you:
- wash the unattached cells
-add the ringer solution
-use the ultrasonic bath to de-attached cells (not to kill them!)
-dilute and plate the samples
These are described in:
Hoewer, we just optimise and published one excelent method based on PCR for direct, accurable and specific quantification of attached cells. Here we use dPCR for direct quantification of standard curve and qPCR for ct determination of the sample. Please read:
Enjoy your science!!!
Anja
  • asked a question related to Bacterial Biofilm
Question
3 answers
The next stage of my project requires growing single species biofilms in 96 well microtitre trays by placing PCR plates with the 'pegs' sitting in the bacteria culture to grow biofilms on them, as described in this paper: " Antibacterial Activity of Blue Light against Nosocomial Wound Pathogens Growing Planktonically and as Mature Biofilms" by Halstead et al.
However previous groups have struiggled due to the coned shape of the pegs, are there any with flatter bases and/or more cylindrical rather than conical pegs?
Thanks
Relevant answer
Answer
Interesting question and looking forward to read answers
  • asked a question related to Bacterial Biofilm
Question
2 answers
I am interested in the synergistic effect of the electric current and certain antimicrobials in treatment of bacterial biofilm. Looking in the literature I could not find a real explanation of the bioelectric effect, only postulates and assumptions.
I would highly appreciate it if anyone has any insight into this field!
thanks!
Relevant answer
Answer
I would like to know what is your plan. Are developing a new thing?
  • asked a question related to Bacterial Biofilm
Question
5 answers
I wonder what is the solubility of any EPS? Does it contributes to alkalinity/acidity of a medium? What is the pKa/pKb? Does it really depends on the functional groups of the EPS?
Relevant answer
Answer
The solubility of EPS varies greatly, depending on its composition. Even within a single organism, such as certain Lactobacilli, homopolymers can vary greatly, depending on their structure. For example, Streptococcus spp. produce two types of glucose polymers: water-soluble dextran and water-insoluble mutan, as well as intermediate combination forms of both.
Regarding the pKa and acidity, that also depends on the EPS structure. In the case of neutral polysaccharides, composed of neutral sugars like glucose or mannose, it's not much of an issue. In the instance of acidic polysaccharides like bacterial alginate, it MAY be an issue. However, these usually exist in the salt form at physiological pH, rather than in the protonated, acidic form. The presence of acidic carboxylate groups will definitely affect the buffering capacity and metal-binding capacity of such biofilms. So, yes, it can depend on the functional groups within the EPS.
  • asked a question related to Bacterial Biofilm
Question
3 answers
How can I assess the effect of vapour-phase essential oil on bacterial biofilm?
Relevant answer
Answer
Essential oils are valuable natural products used as raw materials in many fields including perfumes, cosmetics, aromatherapy, phototherapy, spices, and nutrition. Peppermint (M. piperita) oil is one of the most popular and widely used essential oils, mostly because of its main components, Menthol, and menthone. Previous studies have shown antiviral, antibacterial, antifungal, antibiofilm formation, radioprotective , antioedema , analgesic, and antioxidant activities
  • asked a question related to Bacterial Biofilm
Question
3 answers
We want to confirm presence of bacterial biofilm in-vivo. I have two questions regarding this:
1. What staining technique would be the best?
2. What is the best way to fix the samples in order not to disturb the biofilm itself?
And maybe is there any other technique that can be used to check for biofilm presence in-vivo?
Relevant answer
Answer
You can use acridine orange staining see this link
  • asked a question related to Bacterial Biofilm
Question
3 answers
How many mg of CHO present in 1mg of lyophilized biofilm polysaccharide? I know it varies with bacteria but any one know range?
Relevant answer
  • asked a question related to Bacterial Biofilm
Question
6 answers
we tried to get the surface profile of the untreated sand sample and bacteria treated sand with biopolymers on the surface of the sample in wet condition. we used 3D OSP for this purpose. we got the surface profile of untreated sand sample but for biopolymer coated sand in wet condition does not give any results. The instrument does not sense the sample. we tried 5 times but no result. what will be the problem? how to get surface profile/ surface rough ness of the wet biopolymer coated sand surface?
Note: 3D OSP instrument is working fine.confirmed.
Relevant answer
Answer
Manish Gupta: You are right for white light interferometry or phase shift techniques. On the contrary, white Light Axial Chromatism actually work well on rough more specular surfaces. Inteferometry will work up to an angle level depending on magnification used.  White light Axial Chromatism will work to a higher minimum angle for flat polished surfaces like glass and can go up to close to 85degree angular on highly specular surfaces. 
  • asked a question related to Bacterial Biofilm
Question
4 answers
Hello,
I'm fixating bacterial biofilms on plastic surfaces for SEM imaging and I don't have the facilities for critical point drying, nor access to Hexamethyldisilizane (HMDS) as a drying agent.
So I wonder, what are the properties that a chemical drying agent should bring for preserving bacterial morphology? Is there any "quick and dirty" method I could use instead?
Best,
Joana
Relevant answer
Answer
The HMDS method has be tested and even less expensive especially comparing it with the CPD method. I think you should just use the method as it is very reliable. See the procedure here
Transfer your sample from 100% ethanol into a 1:2 solution of HMDS: 100% ethanol and leave for 20 minutes
2.  Transfer your sample to a fresh solution of 2:1 HMDS:ethanol for 20 minutes
3.  Now transfer the sample into 100% HMDS for 20 minutes, and repeat this step
4. When you sample is submerged in the final 100% HMDS solution leave covered or capped loosely in a fume hood overnight
5.  All HMDS steps need to be carried out in the fume hood wearing the necessary personal protection gear as it is highly toxic
6.  The HMDS will evaporate, leaving your sample ready for sputter coating and imaging in the SEM.
Best wishes....
  • asked a question related to Bacterial Biofilm
Question
4 answers
Hello,
I have some problems with scum on the top of anaerobic digester. Does anyone know what this could be? In the biological sludge there are bacteria Nocardia A.
Many thanks.
Mr. Francesco Baldini
Relevant answer
Answer
I deal the problem of scum in my book https://www.crcpress.com/Managing-Biogas-Plants-A-Practical-Guide/Rosato/p/book/9781138626614 (corrected and improved English edition) and in the former Italian edition (http://www.editorialedelfino.it/manuale-per-il-gestore-dell-impianto-di-biogas-1763.html) and in this article in Italian (http://agronotizie.imagelinenetwork.com/bio-energie-rinnovabili/2017/02/13/lo-schiumometro-per-gli-impianti-di-biogas/52868).  My personal experience is that the story of filamentous bacteria is bullshit. Scum forms because of protein or saponin rich biomass and / or too much alkalinity and VFA at the same time (another bullshit the FOS/TAC, one should look at the individual values not at just the quotient , you can download my paper from researchgate).
  • asked a question related to Bacterial Biofilm
Question
7 answers
Along with which virulence factors produced during that biofilm transition stage from the planktonic cells. Its good that it was found that cells experience shear stress and flow for formation of biofilms. 
Relevant answer
Answer
Time of forming biofilm or quality of that depends on many factor, especially virulence genes. In my project toxin-antitoxin, I had many strains that isolated from patient but only some few one had ability to producing biofilm.
Good luck with your research.
  • asked a question related to Bacterial Biofilm
Question
3 answers
The smooth pattern or surface of the inner lumen helps microorganisms to attach and form biofilm within those regions. A change in the smoothness can decrease the attachment of microorganisms and in turn decrease the ability to form biofilm.
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Vikrant, surface roughness is an important parameter in the biofilm formation of bacteria. With increasing surface roughness on biomaterial surfaces, more bacteria attach and form biofilm. Smooth surfaces and antimicrobial coatings decline adhesion of bacteria and decrease or prevent biofilm formation. We have one paper related to this issue on alloy material surfaces.
J Biomed Mater Res 81A: 663–668, 2007
Best regards
  • asked a question related to Bacterial Biofilm
Question
3 answers
To test the antibiotic effect on anaerobic oral bacteria in biofilm setting, which methods are most acceptable and recommended?
Relevant answer
Answer
 
Hi:
You can use the following practical reference (attached file). It is very helpful: SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTING OF ANAEROBIC BACTERIA
Regards
  • asked a question related to Bacterial Biofilm
Question
3 answers
Hello everyone, I am having difficulty growing Listeria monocytogenes biofilms using the Calgary Biofilm Device (CBD) for the purpose of completing a MBEC assay.  It seems like the biofilms are not adhering to the pegs, as tested by a CV staining assay. I have tried using different broths (brain heart infused (BHI) broth, BHI broth with 0.1% glucose, BHI broth with 1% glucose, BHI broth with 2% glucose, Tryptic soy broth (TSB) and TSB with 0.6% yeast extract), different incubation temperatures (37 degrees celsius and 30 degrees celsius), different rotation speeds (110 rpm, 200 rpm and stationary) as well as different incubation times (24hrs, 48 hrs, & 72hrs (changing media every 24hrs)). Iv'e tried all of these different methods with no success. Does anyone have any suggestions or different methodology? Thank you! 
Relevant answer
Answer
Thank you Mert Sudagidan for your valuable input. You are right, this strain of Listeria monocytogenes is probably not a strong biofilm former. We will try with another strain for these experiments, thanks again!
  • asked a question related to Bacterial Biofilm
Question
7 answers
According to my observation P. aeruginosa dominate S. aureus when they grow in together. 
Relevant answer
Answer
This is a great article to read. 
  • asked a question related to Bacterial Biofilm
Question
3 answers
I would like to do a test with the most similar washing machine conditions in order to evaluate a surface developed to prevent biofilm growth.
i would like to do in a short time if it  was possible.
I did several lab test and the results were really good, but no I have to do the most real test. 
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Lydia Horndler,
Your project seems to be very interesting since biofilms develop on several biotic and abiotic surfaces including washing machines.
The laboratory conditions are different from those in washing machines. It is necessary to take into account the standard conditions in these machines including the products used and presenting antimicrobial effects.
I'm anxious to know the progress of your project. S.M.L. Seddiki
  • asked a question related to Bacterial Biofilm
Question
2 answers
Hi dear scientific community,
please suggest me,
How to prepare samples for the FESEM study of Phage- biofilm interactions. please provide me the procedure...
Thank you in advance...
Relevant answer
Answer
Thank u stalin....
  • asked a question related to Bacterial Biofilm
Question
7 answers
I want to identify, separate and quantify S. aureus and P. aeruginosa from dual-species cultures both from planktonic and biofilm. Could there be any other method to do so without using flow cytometry or fluorescence proteins?
Thank you in advance,
Legesse
Relevant answer
Answer
You can use a real-time fluorescent quantitative PCR reaction with specific primers of S. aureus and P. aeruginosa.
  • asked a question related to Bacterial Biofilm
Question
3 answers
Is it possible to identify or differntiate bacterial biofilm and algal biofilm by naked eyes?
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Sundar, you can visualize bacterial biofilms by staining crystal violet or safranin after washing non-adhering cells.
Best regards.
  • asked a question related to Bacterial Biofilm
Question
3 answers
lyophilized extract of E. coli, E. cloacae, E. faecalis and K. pneumoniae biofilm to find some sugar component
Relevant answer
Answer
Proteinase helps but considering the nature of the exopolysaccharide matrix I would also  consider a cocktail containing polysaccharase. you can check the work of I.W Sutherland on the topic. It is a very valuable source of informations.
Also for purely chemical analysis of monosaccharide, mild acid hydrolysis (diluted H2SO4 and Trifluoroacetic acid (TFA)) at 100C works very well.
  • asked a question related to Bacterial Biofilm
Question
1 answer
I am running a small scale 7 litre MBBR and would like to work out how many exact carriers I will need to achieve 50 % reactor volume fill (of empty reactor). The density is 0.95 kg/m3, diameter of ONE carrier is 12.5 mm, height is 10 mm,  and each carrier has an effective surface area of 500 m2/m3.
Relevant answer
Answer
Here I am referring K1 type Kaldnes carriers, you can find for K3
The units of carrier K1 per m3 were 1,030,000 (Supplier will provide this number for K3)
In your case
Reactor vol: 7 lit; Fill fraction: 0.5 (50 %)
Req. Carrier Media Vol:  3.5 lit
So required number of carriers: 3605
Otherwise, take simply 3.5 lit carriers volumetrically.
  • asked a question related to Bacterial Biofilm
Question
2 answers
Biofilm Growth
Relevant answer
Answer
The simple protocol is Crystal violet (CV) assay in a 96-well plate described by staphylococci (Stepanovic 2007).
  • asked a question related to Bacterial Biofilm
Question
5 answers
Did any one have a paper on primer sequence for evaluation of biofilm formationby Streptococcus mutans using real time pcr.
Relevant answer
Answer
Differential gene expression profiling of
Streptococcus mutans cultured under biofilm and
planktonic conditions
  • asked a question related to Bacterial Biofilm
Question
2 answers
What is the formula of calculating biofilm age in MBBR? In some papers, we need dettachment rate of biomass to measure biofilm age. Do you know that? Do you have any idea? Could you please introduce me a reference or paper?
Thanks a lot!
Relevant answer
Answer
Hello, I think that biofilm age = biofilm mass / detachment rate. According to my knowledge detachment rate is not measurable. Biofilm age can therefore only be estimated with a model as proposed in our paper: A zero-dimensional biofilm model for dynamic simulation of moving bed bioreactor systems: Model concepts,
Peterson matrix, and application to a pilot-scale plant. Biochemical Engineering Journal 40 (2008) 392–398.
  • asked a question related to Bacterial Biofilm
Question
3 answers
Actually, I went through some searching about the quantification of biofilm AHLs, but I can't find any publications about it yet. Most researches would be about quantification of AHLs in cell cultures, but not in the biofilm. Could anyone help me to suggest some publications about it? Thank you very much. It will be very helpful to my current research.
Relevant answer
Answer
I think this review article would be very helpful:
 N-Acylhomoserine Lactones, Quorum Sensing, and Bioflm Development in Gram-negative Bacteria
  • asked a question related to Bacterial Biofilm
Question
9 answers
That the bacterial biofilm formation jest on non living organisms surfaces or can found inside living host . So what the simple methods to detected it ? 
Relevant answer
Answer
You can use this protocol, normally work for most bacteria.
Biofilm formation assay
The amount of biofilm formed by the different strains was determined using a semi-quantita-tive adherence assay in 96-well polystyrene microtiter plates (BD Biosciences) as previouslydescribed [23,26,28]. Briefly, 20μl of stock cultures were inoculated into 5 ml (selective) BHImedium and grown to the end-exponential growth phase in a shaking incubator at 37°C. Cul-tures were subsequently diluted to an OD600of 0.005 (5.x106CFU/ml) in fresh BHI mediumwhether or not supplemented with 4% NaCl or 1% glucose. 200μl of the diluted cultures ofbacteria were pipetted into sterile 96-well polystyrene microtiter plates and incubated over-night at 37°C without shaking.After incubation, the wells were rinsed 3 times with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) anddried afterwards. The adhered material was stained with 200μl of a 1% (w/v) crystal violet(Sigma) solution for 10 min, and subsequently, the wells were washed 3 times with water andagain dried. For quantification, 160μl of 30% (v/v) acetic acid solution was added to each wellto dissolve the crystal violet. The OD595of the dissolved stain was measured in a multipurposeUV/VIS plate reader (VICTOR3TM; PerkinElmer)
The Possible Role of Staphylococcus epidermidis LPxTG Surface Protein SesC in Biofilm Formation. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/291518077_The_Possible_Role_of_Staphylococcus_epidermidis_LPxTG_Surface_Protein_SesC_in_Biofilm_Formation [accessed Dec 19, 2016].
  • asked a question related to Bacterial Biofilm
Question
8 answers
Sorry I have a very simple and basic question. Now I am screening the ability for  S. aureus and S. epidermidis to form biofilm in 96-well plates. The media is TSB with 0.25% glucose. After 24h culture, I found one strain of S. epidermidis form biofilm at the air-liquid interface on the well. However, I also found some strains form at the bottom of the well. So I am a little confused, does S.aureus and S.epidermidis form biofilm at the air-liquid interface in 96-well plates (just like P.aeruginosa), or they can also form biofilm at the bottom.
Thank you very much.
Relevant answer
Answer
Staphylococcus is quite a large genus and encompasses a lot of different strains.
If you are just screening for biofilm formers then you can go with the species that forms biofilms attached to  the plate. The films that float would probably be more difficult to work with !  The films that float may be interesting because they could contain biofilm amyloids which some biofilm species express at certain stages of maturity , but i haven't really seen that many in Staphylococcus.
To promote more biofilm growth in Staphylococcal species , I use  high bind (ELISA type) plates or just Hi-bind . These have a specially modified surface for binding organic molecules . Lower grades of plastic do not grow biofilms very well.
Not all species will form biofilms at 37C but if you drop the temperature to 20 C you might discover some more .
My optimal biofilm cultivation technique is to grow my species of interest to stationary phase, usually overnight  then I dilute the suspension 1/100 in weak media. The media is usually  1/2 strength TSB or 1/5 in the case of environmental isolates. Lastly it is very rare that I shake or rotate the 96 well plates. For S. aureus, I would follow the protocol described , incubate for 3 days at 20-25C  (cover with aluminium foil , make sure plates are on a flat surface and then quickly stain with crystal violet in the procedure described by McGloughlan I think .
good luck with your screen .
some of the procedures are outlined here
and specific for staphylococcus here
  • asked a question related to Bacterial Biofilm
Question
5 answers
Hi,
I would like to know that in general, is there any relation between biofilm growth and planktonic growth. Is it possible that biofilm formation and growth reduces the planktonic growth in the bacteria culture media, during the intended incubation time (e.g., 24 hours)?
I would appreciate if anybody can help me,
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Ima Ghaeli,
Thanks for your question. Maybe the following is of help.
1)      Cell numbers. A surface in contact with a liquid containing biodegradable nutrients and microorganisms will in general lead to growth of microorganisms on the surfaces and in the liquid. Detachment of (lumps of biofilm) cells from the biofilm into the liquid may occur, affecting the number of microbial cells in the liquid. So, it is a bit how planktonic growth is defined. The increase in the total number of cells in the liquid could be increased due to detachment from the biofilm.
2)      Growth of cells in a biofilm may affect conditions for microbial growth, such as (local) changes in oxygen/nutrient concentration, pH, which possibly may reduce the total or rate of growth of microbial cells in the liquid.
Hypothesized is that two counteracting affects may occur. An increase in liquid cell number by detachment from the biofilm, and a decline in liquid total cell number by the biofilm growth affecting growth conditions negatively.
Best regards, Hans
  • asked a question related to Bacterial Biofilm
Question
5 answers
As it have noted everywhere, there are control positive and negative strains for biofilm formation, however, when detecting the level of biofilm formation (strong, weak, ...) several different quantities have considered. Is there any specific formula for the levels determination based on OD values? 
kind regards... 
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Abdolmajid, 
A better approach would be to use the negative control data (using sterile media) to compare with each of your tests using something like Dunnett's comparisons of means using a control. This will allow you to test the significance of the difference in OD600 (or whichever measurement you use - we use Crystal violet binding as measured by A575) directly, rather than accepting a common practice of plus or minus 2 SE,
Regards, Andrew
  • asked a question related to Bacterial Biofilm
Question
6 answers
I am preparing AT medium, and I have to prepare an FeSO4·7H2O stock separately from the other components.
I prepare the 50x solution (34,75 g/L), but the problem comes when I filter it:
The initial solution turns yellow after mixing the powder, but when I filter it (either 0.2 um or 0,45 um) the solution is colorless and the filter turns yellow.
What am I missing?
Thanks in advance,
Xavi.
Relevant answer
Answer
The correct color of FeSO4 should be pale green to colorless (depending on your concentration). The yellow color should come from trace amount of Fe[III] in the FeSO4. Fe[III] will hydrolyse and become Fe2O3 gel (yellow to orange). The gel is filtered out and left on the filter. As Fe[II] is readily oxidized by O2 in air, it is better to prepare your solution with degassed water and  keep your FeSO4 solution isolated from air .
  • asked a question related to Bacterial Biofilm
Question
1 answer
Experiment description
We want to compare bacterial biofilm production in normal conditions and  in negative pressure  environment. 
Group #1
Bacterial strains growing in 96-wells microtitle plate/
For each strain we do 4 replication.
 Group #2
The same strains growing in negative pressure environment.
Actually we prepare two similar 96-wells microtitle plates. One goes to normal thermostat and another goes to thermostat with negative pressure (for this we created special system.).
After incubation we measure Optical density for both plates and compare them.
 Questions:
 What stat method do we need to apply?
How many strains should be in experiment?
What is our “n”? Numer of strains or number of replication?
Relevant answer
Answer
What stat method do we need to apply?
Your description is a bit unclear RE replication. Are there four 96-well plates for each strain, or 4 intra-plate wells per strain?
You can test one variable (pressure), or multiple (strain + pressure). Paired t-test or ANOVA per strain simplest for former. Define null hypothesis first. I suspect you are first examining whether negative pressure has a statistically-significant effect on biofilm formation/adherence for an individual strain. Note, define your acceptable level of confidence that means/medians are significantly different (95, 90%) pre facto, not afterwards.
How many strains should be in experiment?
As many as you have and as practicable. However, if you have strains with known differing biofilm forming characteristics (EPS chemistry, gross EPS amount/cell biomass, etc.), strains of each kind would be optimally tested. If multiple strains of each kind, even better. Limited by logistics.
What is our “n”? Numer of strains or number of replication?
Depends on the hypothesis being tested. If between pressure/ no pressure and 4 wells per strain, n = 4. If 4 plates per strain, n = 96 X 4.
Not sure about your O.D. method, unless the wells are repeatably stained and rinsed to increase sensitivity. A number of stains are available, see O'Toole (2011) J Vis Exp. 2011; (47): 2437.
  • asked a question related to Bacterial Biofilm
Question
2 answers
collecting samples from hospital environment
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi Mahmod,
An easy way to quantify biofilm production of environmental isolates is a microtiterplate assay using kristalviolet. More information regarding the procedure can be found in Bosmans et al. 2015.
For a more reliable estimate in realistic conditions, we use a pilot-scale system to evaluate biofilm formation capacity (and efficacy of chemical or physical treatments to remove biofilms). Fot the latter: see Vankerckhoven et al. 2011; Bosmans et al. 2016; and Lambert et al.
  • asked a question related to Bacterial Biofilm
Question
3 answers
Hi,
I'm trying to learn bacterial biofilm FISH microscopy.I used universal RNA probe EUB338c 16s tagged with Cy3. What exact color should be observed by CY3 tagged probe? I found my sample fluoresce dark pink, even many a paper suggested it must be red or pink, but I found its emission wavelength 570nm, that must be yellow zone. Is my result giving pseudochrome or there is any problem with my protocol?
Relevant answer
Answer
There is no problem with your protocol. I was also surprised when I first encountered this problem. The color of Cy3 is pinkish red and that of Cy5 is blue to the naked eye. However emission spectrum of Cy3 is in the greenish yellow and that of Cy5 is in the Red region. This happens if they were excited with monochromatic light equal to their  excitation maxima (Which is true when you are scanning it in a microarray scanner). But In Confocal/ FISH/ Floroscence microscope , the excitation spectrum contains a range of wavelengths which leads to a range in the emission spectra. That is why the color of Cy3 and Cy5 is same both in microscope and as you see in visible light. 
  • asked a question related to Bacterial Biofilm
Question
4 answers
How can i research about a bacterial population increasing or decreasing in a biofilm produced by the bacteria by basic methods? Are there any staining and screening basic methods ?
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Mert,
          You can quantify bacterial population within a biofilm by disintegrating biofilms using sonicator and then count the no. of cells by serial dilution method. 
You can follow the following article: http://aem.asm.org/content/64/12/4789.long
Good luck!
Prasun Kumar, Ph.D.
  • asked a question related to Bacterial Biofilm
Question
7 answers
Hello- during our study on antibiofilm activity of nano-silver on some food borne pathogen (salmonella) on polystyrene 25 wells micopaltes, we found that as we increase nano-silver concentration, the antibiofilm activity decrease. I would be happy to have my colleague ideas about this unpredictable phenomenon.
All the best
mehran
Relevant answer
Answer
my guess is the more bacteria you killed, the higher biofilm substrate you increased in certain time span.adding with biphasic  dispersing reagent may help.
  • asked a question related to Bacterial Biofilm
Question
3 answers
In biofilm-induced corrosion on polymer coated metal/alloy Is it the organisms by themselves damage the structure of the coatings by their metabolic activity or is it the moisture impact of bio-film/bio-fouling reduces the protective behavior of the coating?
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Mark Reuter
Thanks for your reply. So far I understood that biofilm/ biofouling formation on coatings (on metal structures) reduce the insulative behaviour of the coatings.  I too agree that these organisms interact directly wit the metal/alloys. But I do not know how they participate in lowering the protective performance of the coating on a metal surface.
  • asked a question related to Bacterial Biofilm
Question
4 answers
I am trying to grow mature P. aeruginosa biofilms (4 days old) in the Innovotech MBEC Assay apparatus (which is originally designed for growing young biofilms i.e. 24 hours old). I am using Mueller Hinton Broth as the growth medium. I refresh the bacterial suspension everyday. However, I am failing to see an increase in the bacterial load in the mature biofilms that grow over the pegs as compared to the young ones. What changes in the growth conditions would you recommend to achieve a higher bacterial load ?
Relevant answer
Answer
I have personally found that changing the media of biofilms in a 96 well plate is disruptive to the development of the biofilm (the thinking being that the force of removing and replacing the liquid media could be displacing parts of the biofilm, therefore losing more loosened during the washing stages).  This may not apply if you are quantifying biofilms on pegs.
I've found P. aeruginosa biofilms can develop nicely in 3-5 days in low nutrient conditions and usually go for diluted nutrient broth.
Look at some methods for flow-chamber media replacement, I think it is more common there.