Science topic
AutoDock 4 - Science topic
Explore the latest questions and answers in AutoDock 4, and find AutoDock 4 experts.
Questions related to AutoDock 4
I have been trying to perform docking with autodock4 and it seems like the operation starts but never completes. The attached dlg file doesn't show any results and I am not getting any error messages in the console. Any help would be appreciated.
Hi, guys. I started doing some dockings a few days ago and there was an constantly error showing up on the autodocktools cmd:
"swig/python detected a memory leak of type 'BHtree *', no destructor found." (PFA a printscreen of the error).
The error kept showing up after every command i gave. For example, after every missing atom added it showed up again. I didn't mind at first, because everything was working just fine, even though I was wondering if my results would be realiable with such an error.
But now, there is another error showing up on the autodock (You can also find a printscreen attached), and i can't dock anything anymore. I have already tried reinstalling autodock and MGLtools.
Has anyone had this same errors? Would you know how can I solve it? Just making clear that I'm not familiar with programming.
Thank you so much!


I have tried many times to dock ubenimex n (Compound CID: 72172) with a protein but every time the ligand breaks into two pieces. Kindly help. i have used chemdraw, 3d sdf file, gaussian fchk file, mol2 file to convert the ligand into pdb file but every time Autodock splits the ligand. Hydrogens and charges were added. ligand is neutral.
[Traceback (most recent call last):
File "C:\Program Files (x86)\MGLTools-1.5.6\lib\site-packages\ViewerFramework\VF.py", line 898, in tryto
result = command( *args, **kw )
File "C:\Program Files (x86)\MGLTools-1.5.6\lib\site-packages\AutoDockTools\autoanalyzeCommands.py", line 3852, in doit
d.readDlg(dlgFile)
File "C:\Program Files (x86)\MGLTools-1.5.6\lib\site-packages\AutoDockTools\Docking.py", line 105, in readDlg
self.ch = ConformationHandler(self.ligMol,
AttributeError: Docking instance has no attribute 'ligMol']
Hi everyone, I'm currently working on an autodock4 and I've received those warning in my running process. I don't know how to fix or how it affects to my final results. Attached below are my dpf file and cmd warning.
Thanks for your advices.


Hello,
I was wondering if there is a procedure available for implementing and running an exhaustiveness setting of 24 in Autodock 4.
My goal is to conduct a comparative analysis between the pose results obtained from Autodock Vina and Autodock 4 while maintaining consistent control parameters, including exhaustiveness, for both programs. Is running exhaustiveness = 24 possible in Autodock 4 just like in Vina? If so, how does one go about it?
Thank you in advance!
Dear scientists, I need help with molecular docking with Autodock.
- When I upload the Protein or Ligand structure, the command "swig/python detected a memory leak of type 'BHtree *', no destructor found" appears on the screen (Picture 1).
- Then, I can't Run AutoGrid or AutoDock. When I press the Launch command (with files created), it only results in a window like this and sometimes nothing happens and The error log says "Sorry, I can't find or open Grid Parameter File "C:/Users/..." . I have everything in one folder already so it should find the files (Picture 2).
Can anyone tell me what have I done wrong and how to correct it? I tried a few times and it is still the same.
I look forward to receiving help from you.
Thanks very much.


I'm performing interactions between DNA as the macromolecule and Ethidium Bromide as the ligand. I'm looking to make the entire DNA molecule flexible in order to perform blind docking. However, I am getting this error every single time I try to do so and am confused what is going on. Can someone help me figure out how to make the DNA flexible?

I researched about this but most of the instructions online is for AutoDock 4. I tried the same steps by adding the needed parameters to AD4_Parameter.dat and AD4.1_bound.dat but I cannot find the .gpf and .dpf files so the changes i made with the parameters were useless. Please help me, what should I do if I cannot find the .gpf and .dpf? Thank you.

either autodock 4 output file show h bond and other program dose not show it ,
or other program show it and autodock dose not show it
hello,
i am getting idle1.2.2 error in autodock1.5.6. to open my pdb 1j5e file, file is not even visualized on my screen. so i am getting error in first step of docking.
please give response
thank you.

"ERROR! Too many atom types have been found: maximum is 14; we cannot continue"
Does anyone know how to solve it?
Running Linux ubuntu in windows 11 using WSL
I have anaconda3 installed
I'm running the covalent docking tutorial for autodock vina available from:
When i run the prepareCovalent.py script I get the following:
Input:
(vina) gorrie06@DMGLaptop:~/docking/covalent$ python ~/docking/covalent/adcovalent/prepareCovalent.py --ligand /3upo_test/ligand.mol2 --ligindices 1,2 --receptor /3upo_test/3upo_protein.pdb --residue B:SER222 --outputfile ligcov.pdb
Output:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/gorrie06/docking/covalent/adcovalent/prepareCovalent.py", line 36, in <module>
import pybel
File "/home/gorrie06/anaconda3/envs/vina/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pybel.py", line 89, in <module>
informats = _formatstodict(_obconv.GetSupportedInputFormat())
File "/home/gorrie06/anaconda3/envs/vina/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pybel.py", line 68, in _formatstodict
broken = [(x, y.strip()) for x, y in broken]
ValueError: need more than 1 value to unpack
This is the function that is being referred to by the output (from pybel.py):
def _formatstodict(list):
if sys.platform[:4] == "java":
list = [list.get(i) for i in range(list.size())]
broken = [x.replace("[Read-only]", "").replace("[Write-only]", "").split(
" -- ") for x in list]
broken = [(x, y.strip()) for x, y in broken]
return dict(broken)
I have been able to modify pybel.py to prevent error but then the script prepareCovalent.py fails to read the pdb file.
Any help is greatly appreciated!
Thank you!
Is it the only way to validate the docking protocol in Autodock?
hallo everybody , iam using autodock vina for small molecule docking , however after finalizing everything with the grid the running of autogrid cannot be predeeded and no gld file is created with the following error.
can any one help me with that?
thnx in advance

Hello, I've been attempting to simulate a beta cyclodextrin and drug inclusion complex, where this drug is one that I'm working on for a research project and can act as a ligand. The idea was to have the cyclodextrin act as a receptor to create an inclusion complex, but I haven't been able to achieve this. I have some experience with Autodock4 so I do know that protein-ligand interactions can be simulated with ease. However, I recall reading a post a few days ago that had me thinking if my efforts were for naught. Several commenters claimed the software wasn't viable for simulating these types of interactions. Could anyone please enlighten me on this?
Hi,
I am using AutoDock 4 for covalent docking. I wonder - is it possible to provide as input a pdbqt file with multiple ligands included, and later parse the dlg output accordingly? If so - what main modifications are required to the docking process, and is there a tutorial (or examples of the format of the batched pdbqt input and output files) available? Thanks!!
I would appreciate people's thoughts on a methodology consideration.
We're docking several thousand small molecules at a specific location on the receptor. We're using Autodoc Vina to reduce the library to e.g., 20 compounds. Then, further reduction follows using generalised Born and surface area solvation (MM/GBSA), etc.
This is my concern. The crystal structure is a substrate-bound enzyme. Those that prepared the structure mutated Glu to Gln to prevent activation. This single-point mutation is far from where we are docking the compounds e.g., > 4 nanometres.
We are considering what our risks and limitation in our study are before running anything. Will an in silico modification (reverting from Gln to Glu) in the crystal structure affect calculation performed by Autodock (vina of AD4) if those changes are outside the grid box in which docking calculations are performed?
I understand the calculations performed by Adutodock/Vina are stochastic to a degree, so a direct comparison of how that mutation affects the results would be tough to produce. However, is there any merit in performing a before and after screening on the receptor, even if that change is far from the docking site?
I would appreciate people's thoughts on a methodology consideration.
We're docking several thousand small molecules at a specific location on the receptor. We're using Autodoc Vina to reduce the library to e.g., 20 compounds. Then, further reduction follows using generalised Born and surface area solvation (MM/GBSA), etc.
This is my concern. The crystal structure is a substrate-bound enzyme. Those that prepared the structure mutated Glu to Gln to prevent activation. This single-point mutation is far from where we are docking the compounds e.g., > 4 nanometres. We are considering what our risks and limitation in our study are before running anything. Will an in silico modification (reverting from Gln to Glu) in the crystal structure affect calculation performed by Autodock (vina of AD4) if those changes are outside the grid box in which docking calculations are performed?
I understand the calculations performed by Adutodock/Vina are stochastic to a degree, so a direct comparison of how that mutation affects the results would be tough to produce. However, is there any merit in performing a before and after screening on the receptor, even if that change is far from the docking site?
I've downloaded a text file full of curl and wget (two separate files) commands to download PDBQT files from ZINC20. However, none of the commands work. I've tried it on two machines using different internet connections.
This is published work, so it should work "off the shelf" and require no intervention. This is an example of a failed command:
shodan@DESKTOP-L2JG9M2:~/MMP1/COLLAGEN_DOCKING$ curl --remote-time --fail --create-dirs -o BA/AAMN/BAAAMN.xaa.pdbqt.gz http://files.docking.org/3D/BA/AAMN/BAAAMN.xaa.pdbqt.gz
% Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time Current
Dload Upload Total Spent Left Speed
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 --:--:-- 0:01:04 --:--:-- 0
curl: (56) Recv failure: Connection reset by peer
Answers are appreciated.
Hello! I would very much appreciate some help. I have the 3d structure prediction of subunits alpha and beta of a dioxygenase from Phyre2 and I would like to merge these components in a final model of the complete enzyme using Chimera (preferably) or a similar program. Is this possible? What steps should I follow? Thank you in advance!
After selecting the residues of the protein for flexible docking, when I click on "Choose Torsions In Currently Selected Residues", under the " Flexible Residues" tab, I get this error:
prot:A:MET1:HN1 and prot:A:MET1:HN1 have the same coordinates
ERROR *********************************************
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "C:\Program Files (x86)\MGLTools-1.5.7\lib\site-packages\ViewerFramework\VF.py", line 941, in tryto
result = command( *args, **kw )
File "C:\Program Files (x86)\MGLTools-1.5.7\lib\site-packages\AutoDockTools\autoflexCommands.py", line 369, in doit
map(self.setAutoFlexFields, flex_residues)
File "C:\Program Files (x86)\MGLTools-1.5.7\lib\site-packages\AutoDockTools\autoflexCommands.py", line 414, in setAutoFlexFields
rotatables = rbs.select(bondlist)
File "C:\Program Files (x86)\MGLTools-1.5.7\lib\site-packages\MolKit\bondSelector.py", line 534, in select
rotatable = BondOrderBondSelector().select(bnds,1)
File "C:\Program Files (x86)\MGLTools-1.5.7\lib\site-packages\MolKit\bondSelector.py", line 507, in select
atype.assignHybridization(allAts)
File "C:\Program Files (x86)\MGLTools-1.5.7\lib\site-packages\PyBabel\atomTypes.py", line 137, in assignHybridization
self.valence_two()
File "C:\Program Files (x86)\MGLTools-1.5.7\lib\site-packages\PyBabel\atomTypes.py", line 266, in valence_two
angle1 = bond_angle(k.coords, a.coords, l.coords)
File "C:\Program Files (x86)\MGLTools-1.5.7\lib\site-packages\PyBabel\util.py", line 47, in bond_angle
raise ZeroDivisionError("Input used:", a, b, c)
ZeroDivisionError: ('Input used:', [2.015, -1.769, 0.66], [2.015, -1.769, 0.66], [2.015, -1.769, 0.66])
Is there a way to solve this problem?
Dear Experts
I am using AutoDock 4.2.6 in my desktop since 2 years. However, from an unknown reason, it gave up working last week. When I click on the AutoDock Tools 1.5.6 icon on the desktop, the cmd window and the AutoDock tools interface appears, but in a very short time (when the upload bar on the interface shows 6%) it fails, and therefore I can not use the AutoDock tools interface for my docking studies.
Can you please explain me what could be the problem, and what should I do to overcome this ? Also, the python molecule viewer (pmv) is not working in MGL Tools as well as manually when initiated from command prompt window.
Looking forward to hearing your valuable comments.
Sincerely,
While docking SiO2 with a receptor protein in Autodock vina, the software threw an error which says "Si" is not a valid Autodock type. What is the possible reason and how to rectify this. How can we dock such compounds with a protein to see if we can use them in their nanoparticles form to inhibit the protein function?
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Vinay

I have a library of covalent compounds, and I want to run covalent docking for them using Autodock 4. Is there any possible way where I can run multiple compounds at once, like is it possible to use all ligands in a single file, or a certain command that can run all of them at once?
Hi guys!
So im trying to run some small molecules in autodock 4 using pyrx and the following error message keep coming up:
self.tree.SelectItem(self.frame.autodockNav.autodockTree.ligandTree.treeDict[path], False)
AttributeError: 'SelectMoleculesPage' object has no attribute 'tree'
How can i solve that?
Dear Researchers
I am using Autodock-Vina for small molecule docking, I have a library of molecules around 400,000 and I have minimized ligands by MMFF94 and converted them into PDBQT file using Openbabel.
when I look into the pdbqt file number of active torsions are different from no of rotatable bonds.
In the following example number of active torsions are 9 and number of rotatable bonds for the same molecule is 11.
REMARK 9 active torsions:
REMARK status: ('A' for Active; 'I' for Inactive)
REMARK 1 A between atoms: C_1 and C_2
REMARK 2 A between atoms: C_2 and CA_3
REMARK 3 A between atoms: CA_3 and C_4
REMARK 4 A between atoms: CA_3 and N_6
REMARK 5 A between atoms: C_7 and C_9
REMARK 6 A between atoms: C_9 and O_10
REMARK 7 A between atoms: O_10 and C_11
REMARK 8 A between atoms: C_27 and C_29
REMARK 9 A between atoms: C_27 and C_30
Is it mandatory to have an equal number of active torsions are and the number of rotatable bonds?
Please let me know the way to specify the number of torsions in the ligand preparation (command line ).
Thank you
I was trying to dock zinc oxide nanoparticle with protein using Autodock 4. I took protein as macromolecule and nanoparticle as ligand, however instead of docking whole Nanoparticle with protein, it docked only one molecule of zinc oxide with protein. Is there any way to dock nanoparticle with protein ?

First, I've had MGLTools on Windows 10 working fine up until today. Unfortunately, it was about 4 months ago since I last opened it and I forgot the *hack* that was required.
Here is the problem. I've installed AutodockTools (MGLTools - or which order it comes in) and despite it working once before I can't get it to open. This is the error:
Python 2.7.11 (v2.7.11:6d1b6a68f775, Dec 5 2015, 20:32:19) [MSC v.1500 32 bit (Intel)] on win32
Type "copyright", "credits" or "license()" for more information.
==== No Subprocess ====
>>> Traceback (most recent call last):
File "C:\Program Files (x86)\MGLTools-1.5.7\lib\site-packages\AutoDockTools\__init__.py", line 433, in runADT
title=title, withShell= not interactive, verbose=False, gui=gui)
File "C:\Program Files (x86)\MGLTools-1.5.7\lib\site-packages\Pmv\moleculeViewer.py", line 1026, in __init__
trapExceptions=trapExceptions)
File "C:\Program Files (x86)\MGLTools-1.5.7\lib\site-packages\ViewerFramework\VF.py", line 523, in __init__
self.userpref.loadSettings()
File "C:\Program Files (x86)\MGLTools-1.5.7\lib\site-packages\mglutil\preferences.py", line 138, in loadSettings
self.set(key, value)
File "C:\Program Files (x86)\MGLTools-1.5.7\lib\site-packages\mglutil\preferences.py", line 107, in set
cb(name,oldValue, value)
File "C:\Program Files (x86)\MGLTools-1.5.7\lib\site-packages\ViewerFramework\VF.py", line 760, in startupDirPref_cb
root = self.setUserPreference.form.root
AttributeError: SetUserPreference instance has no attribute 'form'
hit enter to continue
Any idea what on earth is going on? A few things to note.
This seems to be trying to launch Python 2.7. The software is also packaged with that version of Python itself (wow, that strikes me as very strange). I tried using Python 3.8, and predictably it did nothing.
Working solutions welcome.
Dear All
I performed docking calculations by Autodock4.2 of certain molecules against a metalloenzyme (Zn2 + is its active site). Then I converted the mean pose (ligand in the active site of the proteine, togather) to a pdb file, and after that I visualized it by Discovery Studio. The Discovery software gave 2 types of interactions (for 2 different ligands ) between the ligands and the active site (Zn2 +):
The first (see image1) in the form of coordination bond (Zn-O) and the second in the form of a weak metal-acceptor (Zn...O) interaction (image2). The first case is best in energy and Ki compared to the second one.
For the first case, I read a recent article (see link) which got a similar results but it didn't explain the nature of the Zn-ligand bond. The second case will certainly be a partial interaction of Zn2+ with negative lone pair of oxygen.
My question how to interpret (or what is the nature of) the intermolecular interaction Zn-O in image1?
Thnk You


My ligand has a quaternized pyridine ring in it's structure, but after editing, when I export it from AutoDock Tools as a .pdbqt file and open it in Discovery Studio Visualizer, the structure of my ligand changes and nitrogen appears to no longer be quaternized (a C=N double bond is lost, the +1 charge on the nitrogen is lost, there are now only 2 double bonds in the ring). The rest of the ligand stays as is, the problem appears to be happening only to the quaternized nitrogen. Is there a way to fix this from happening?


I have searched on PDB but I didn't succeed in retrieve ACE 2 from PDB. Does there any option to obtain this Enzyme.?
Hye researches,
Currently, I require to convert 300 ligand compounds in .pdb format to .pdbqt format to run docking using AutoDock Vina. Since, I have quite many ligands, to save time, I decided to use the AutoDock4 script to convert my ligands to a .pdbqt file. Therefore, I prepared a prepare_ligand4.bat (batch file) to run the script. I followed exactly the method given on the AutoDock4 website yet I can't run the batch script. I'm new to computational study, but curious to learn.
I really need help. Please kindly let me know how can I fix my problem. I will attach my script down here.
Thanks in advance.

hello dears
I have an image from Autodock4. I think the residue text size needs to be increased in this picture of the compound-protein interaction. Anyone know how to do this in autodock4?
I use Covalent Docking from AutoDock4 and I got "!unable to use ligand.TORSDOF! torsdof always set to ligand.ndihe= 9" code out from generating a DPF step. It seems not influence the following step and I pass the docking by ignoring this warning. But what it means? Does it affect my results?
Hi all,
Please imagine this to be a brand new machine with the latest installation of:
Autodock Vina
Autodock
AutodockTools (MGLTools).
I'm following a Nature Protocol for the prediction of activation sites with AutoLigand. This is the first time I've run AutoGrid on my machine, that's important to consider.
I've set up my macromolecule, assigned hydrogens, assigned Kollman charges, saved as a pdbqt, assigned grid map types, and finally defined the gridbox.
The protocol states that I must "Run AutoGrid at the command line". It can also be performed inside AutoDockTools by selecting Run->AutoGrid. However, when I do this I get the following error (please see below):
I was disappointed to learn the autodocktools executes Python. And from the output of the error quite an old version of python too. Any idea what on earth is going on and how to correct this?
Python 2.7.11 (v2.7.11:6d1b6a68f775, Dec 5 2015, 20:32:19) [MSC v.1500 32 bit (Intel)] on win32
Type "copyright", "credits" or "license()" for more information.
==== No Subprocess ====
>>> {'gui': None, 'cmd': <Pmv.selectionCommands.MVSelectCommand instance at 0x10AE6440>, 'name': 'select'}
{'gui': None, 'cmd': <Pmv.selectionCommands.MVDeSelectCommand instance at 0x10AE6530>, 'name': 'deselect'}
{'gui': <ViewerFramework.VFCommand.CommandGUI instance at 0x1043BE90>, 'cmd': <Pmv.selectionCommands.MVClearSelection instance at 0x10AE6580>, 'name': 'clearSelection'}
{'gui': None, 'cmd': <Pmv.selectionCommands.MVExpandSelection instance at 0x10AE6710>, 'name': 'expandSelection'}
{'gui': None, 'cmd': <Pmv.selectionCommands.MVSelectAround instance at 0x10AE6B20>, 'name': 'selectAround'}
{'gui': <ViewerFramework.VFCommand.CommandGUI instance at 0x1043BEB8>, 'cmd': <Pmv.selectionCommands.MVSaveSetCommand instance at 0x10AE6CB0>, 'name': 'saveSet'}
{'gui': None, 'cmd': <Pmv.selectionCommands.MVCreateSetIfNeeded instance at 0x10AE6EE0>, 'name': 'createSetIfNeeded'}
{'gui': <ViewerFramework.VFCommand.CommandGUI instance at 0x10AE63F0>, 'cmd': <Pmv.selectionCommands.MVInvertSelection instance at 0x10AE6FA8>, 'name': 'invertSelection'}
{'gui': <ViewerFramework.VFCommand.CommandGUI instance at 0x1043BF80>, 'cmd': <Pmv.selectionCommands.MVSelectSetCommand instance at 0x10AC5800>, 'name': 'selectSet'}
{'gui': <ViewerFramework.VFCommand.CommandGUI instance at 0x10AE6210>, 'cmd': <Pmv.selectionCommands.MVSelectFromStringCommand instance at 0x10AC5A58>, 'name': 'selectFromString'}
{'gui': <ViewerFramework.VFCommand.CommandGUI instance at 0x10AE6238>, 'cmd': <Pmv.selectionCommands.MVDirectSelectCommand instance at 0x10AC5DA0>, 'name': 'directSelect'}
{'gui': <ViewerFramework.VFCommand.CommandGUI instance at 0x10AE6378>, 'cmd': <Pmv.selectionCommands.MVSelectSphericalRegion instance at 0x10AC5E68>, 'name': 'selectInSphere'}
{'gui': <ViewerFramework.VFCommand.CommandGUI instance at 0x10AE6418>, 'cmd': <Pmv.selectionCommands.SelectNoWaterHeteroAtomsCommand instance at 0x10AC5EE0>, 'name': 'selectHeteroAtoms'}
Exception in Tkinter callback
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "C:\Program Files (x86)\MGLTools-1.5.7\lib\lib-tk\Tkinter.py", line 1410, in __call__
return self.func(*args)
File "C:\Program Files (x86)\MGLTools-1.5.7\lib\site-packages\Pmv\guiTools.py", line 353, in do_1
self.kill(e.widget.get(e.widget.nearest(e.y)))
File "C:\Program Files (x86)\MGLTools-1.5.7\lib\site-packages\AutoDockTools\autostartCommands.py", line 144, in kill
if self.manager.processCts[prog]>0:
KeyError: 'Program'
Exception in Tkinter callback
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "C:\Program Files (x86)\MGLTools-1.5.7\lib\lib-tk\Tkinter.py", line 1410, in __call__
return self.func(*args)
File "C:\Program Files (x86)\MGLTools-1.5.7\lib\site-packages\Pmv\guiTools.py", line 353, in do_1
self.kill(e.widget.get(e.widget.nearest(e.y)))
File "C:\Program Files (x86)\MGLTools-1.5.7\lib\site-packages\AutoDockTools\autostartCommands.py", line 144, in kill
if self.manager.processCts[prog]>0:
KeyError: 'Program'
Exception in Tkinter callback
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "C:\Program Files (x86)\MGLTools-1.5.7\lib\lib-tk\Tkinter.py", line 1410, in __call__
return self.func(*args)
File "C:\Program Files (x86)\MGLTools-1.5.7\lib\site-packages\Pmv\guiTools.py", line 353, in do_1
self.kill(e.widget.get(e.widget.nearest(e.y)))
File "C:\Program Files (x86)\MGLTools-1.5.7\lib\site-packages\AutoDockTools\autostartCommands.py", line 144, in kill
if self.manager.processCts[prog]>0:
KeyError: 'Program'
While running docking of indomethacin with a receptor, Autodock4 doesn't work. In the DLG file, it was stated that the Cl.map file is not found. How can I resolve this problem?
I am very interested to do MLSD calculations in Autodock4. I want to dock two ligands at the same protein place in Autodock4 and I have red a lot of papers about MLSD method but still I do not understand where is a problem. Is there anyone who have example of merged .dpf file of ligands which is necessary for this type of calculations?
May I kindly ask you to tell me if that is possible am I wrong in merged file which I attached?
best wishes,
Marina
Hi all,
I am using OS X El Capitan. I installed AutoDockTools (ADT), but I get an error upon its start. It seems there is a problem with starting X11 or pointing to the correct python libraries.
They mention on the website that starting ADT doesn't invoke X11, so I am not sure how to fix this. This is the error message I get:
"Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/Library/MGLTools/1.5.6/MGLToolsPckgs/AutoDockTools/__init__.py", line 416, in runADT
from Tkinter import Tk
File "/Library/MGLTools/1.5.6/lib/python2.5/lib-tk/Tkinter.py", line 38, in <module>
import _tkinter # If this fails your Python may not be configured for Tk
ImportError: dlopen(/Library/MGLTools/1.5.6/lib/python2.5/lib-dynload/_tkinter.so, 2): Library not loaded: /usr/X11/lib/libX11.6.dylib
Referenced from: /Library/MGLTools/1.5.6/lib/python2.5/lib-dynload/_tkinter.so
Reason: image not found
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/Library/MGLTools/1.5.6/MGLToolsPckgs/AutoDockTools/bin/runAdt.py", line 16, in <module>
AutoDockTools.runADT(sys.argv, ownInterpreter=ownInterpreter, AdtScriptPath=__file__)
File "/Library/MGLTools/1.5.6/MGLToolsPckgs/AutoDockTools/__init__.py", line 574, in runADT
raw_input("hit enter to continue")
EOFError: EOF when reading a line"
Dear all,
I am trying to (blind) dock a hydrocarbon to a protein using autodock4.2 (GA runs = 500). because of the flexibility the ligand is not showing any cluster at rmsd= 2.0. I want to know how to score the best cluster? Even if I guess the cluster (or the active site) by any other method, is there any reliable method to re-score for getting the correct pose?
PS: I have already used DINC (http://dinc.kavrakilab.org)
There is much software that is there for Docking but I was confused about how can I choose the right one from iGEMDOC,AutoDock 4 and AutoDock Vina.
I want to know the difference between these. please answer me regarding my confusion.
Thank You.
npts 64 108 86 # num.grid points in xyz
gridfld 1QZQ.maps.fld # grid_data_file
spacing 0.375 # spacing(A)
receptor_types A C H HD N OA SA # receptor atom types
ligand_types A C HD N NA OA SA S # ligand atom types
receptor 1QZQ.pdbqt # macromolecule
gridcenter 22.346 107.315 207.808 # xyz-coordinates or auto
smooth 0.5 # store minimum energy w/in rad(A)
map 1QZQ.A.map # atom-specific affinity map
map 1QZQ.C.map # atom-specific affinity map
map 1QZQ.HD.map # atom-specific affinity map
map 1QZQ.NA.map #atom-specific affinity.map
map 1QZQ.N.map # atom-specific affinity map
map 1QZQ.OA.map # atom-specific affinity map
map 1QZQ.SA.map # atom-specific affinity map
map 1QZQ.S.map # atom-specific affinity.map
elecmap 1QZQ.e.map # electrostatic potential map
dsolvmap 1QZQ.d.map # desolvation potential map
dielectric -0.1465 # <0, AD4 distance-dep.diel;>0, constant
Here I have added the map for S file as per instruction from research gate but not got my result.
Still showing error autodock4 I,m sorry I can't find or open "1QZQ.S.map"
Hi all,
There are two big questions here. I am extremely grateful for even the smallest contribution that yields a result.
This is concerning Raccoon(1) original, not Raccoon2. The original Raccoon allows your current workstation to perform VS, the new Raccoon2 does not it must be a cluster with PBS queue).
I have two questions:
1) I performed an active site prediction using AutoLigand. From the results I have a site of potential interest, "#Option 7" from a calculation performed with 400 points. When I now come to perform a drug VS on the receptor, how do I specify the location of the potential site on the receptor? I do not want VS to scan the whole surface, only the site I had identified earlier.
I have tried to generate a map file for the receptor target. This is done by loading the target into AutoDockTools, loading in the predicted target .pdb. Building a grid box around the predicted site. However, when I save the grid output as a .gpf file, Raccoon will not accept this map file for the receptor. I see the error:
Map file not found! The .fld map is missing. Select another directory.
(A) Which tool generates the .fld file? (B) Why aren't these generated automatically by ADT? (C) Why does the save .gpf file reference e.g., map.<xxx>_for_docking.A.map yet these files do not exist?
2) I'm running Raccoon(1) along with the latest of AutoDockTools, AutoDock and AutoDock tools. Within Raccoon(1), when I've specified Ligand(s), Receptor(s), Maps, and Docking (all are green), I come to execute "G E N E R A T E" and I'm faced with the error:
Impossible to calculate the cached maps here:
C:/Users/.........\maps
GIVING UP...
Any idea why?
Why is it impossible to calculate the cached maps? No explanation is offered, only the somewhat dire and very unhelpful statement "GIVING UP...".
3) If I select "at each job" for the map generation, I end up with a slightly different error:
Impossible to create the directory:
None
GIVING UP...
Again, not much information to go on. I suspect having seen a post back in 2013 that the problems in (2) and (3) are related to incorrect atom-types in the ligand when generating maps/
#autodock #virtualscreening
Question1: Am I doing this right , means do setting up conda on server works for virtual screening (AUTODOCK)?
Question2: How can I modify the script (submit4.py) according to my server requirements?
Please read bellow for detailed explanation of the question.
Hey
I am new to Virtual Screening.
To learn this I had started with tutorial named “Using AutoDock 4 for Virtual Screening” (Attaching pdf) (http://autodock.scripps.edu/faqs-help/tutorial/using-autodock4-for-virtual-screening).
I was able to replicate the results (UPTO exercise 11) on my local machine.
Now I am trying to replicate the section named “Using the TSRI cluster: garibaldi” on my college server (page 32 in the pdf attached).
I do not have sudo rights in my college server.
So what I did was:
1) Installed CONDA on the server. I made a virtual environment there.
2) Installed autodock, autodock Vina, autodocktools, mgltools on CONDA environment.
3) Then I downloaded the file “submit4.py” and kept it in the path (here in the bin file of my CONDA environment) (I had changed the default path in the script) (attaching the script of submit4.py).
4) When I am launching my jobs. There I am getting this error -
“sh: 7: qsub:Permission denied”.
I had traced this problem back to 32nd line of the submit4.py script.
The line is-
“ qsub -l cput=23:00:00 -l nodes=1:ppn=1 -l walltime=23:30:00 -l mem=512mb %s.j >> %s ”
----------
**so my questions are:**
Question1: Am I doing this right , means do setting up conda like this works for virtual screening ?
Question2: How can I modify the script (submit4.py) according to my server requirements?
The script for submit4.py:
```
#!/usr/bin/env python
#
# Usage: submit4.py stem ndlgs
import sys, posix, time
path = "/home/tushar19221/anaconda3/envs/tushar_env/bin/autodock4"
stem = sys.argv[1]
ndlgs = int(sys.argv[2])
ndlg_start = 1
if (len(sys.argv) == 4):
ndlg_start = int(sys.argv[3])
cwd = posix.getcwd()
created = time.time()
jobIDsName = """%s.%.2f.jobIDs""" % (stem, created)
command = """touch %s\n""" % (jobIDsName,)
posix.system(command)
for i in xrange(ndlg_start, (ndlg_start + ndlgs)):
#
jobname = """%s.%03d""" % (stem, i)
#
command = """echo "ulimit -s unlimited
echo SHELL is $SHELL
echo PATH is $PATH
cd %s
/home/tushar19221/anaconda3/envs/tushar_env/bin/autodock4 -p %s.dpf -l %s.dlg" > %s.j
chmod +x %s.j
qsub -l cput=23:00:00 -l nodes=1:ppn=1 -l walltime=23:30:00 -l mem=512mb %s.j >> %s
""" % (cwd, path, stem, jobname, jobname, jobname, jobIDsName)
#
posix.system(command)
#
# next i
command = """echo "Job %s was launched on %d processors with these
job_identifiers:"
cat %s\n""" % (stem, ndlgs, jobIDsName,)
posix.system(command)
```
Thank you for reading.
Your help is highly appreciated.
I am doing a prediction based study as of now. Hence want to compare the results of Autodock4 with another reliable and free Docking software. Can I do it with Vina, or I need to compare it with other software?
Validation is the most important factor in molecular docking. In molecular docking validation, there is internal validation (searching for <2 A RMSD) and Retrospective Validation (ROC validation). Recently, most of molecular docking paper are use retrospective validation to measure validity of the method that have been chosen. I want to measure the validity of my protein and method through retrospective validation. But, most paper didn't explain how to measure it clearly. Any advice and suggest can help, especially the step by step procedure how to do it. Thank you
Hello,
I am using autodock4 for blind docking of ligand-protein.the size of protein is very large, its contain 5 domains. now i want to make large grid box that cover the whole macro-molecule but according to the protein X, Y and Z coordinates, its cover approx half of the protein structure. i have select 1A spacing with maximum number of points in all dimensions (I.e. 126).
Please guide me is there any way to cover my complete protein structure with the grid box. i have attached my protein structure.
what does this error means while running AutoGrid 4?:
"Found a H-bonding atom with three bonded atoms."
What should I do to solve it?
Hello, I am new in docking. I am using autodock 4. I found minimum binding energy from RMSD table of autodock run. But when I run pdb file on chimera or pymol then show no hydrogen bonding between protein and ligand. I found there were several bond ( vanderwal force, pi bond, etc) are responsible for minimum binding energy other than hydrogen bond. So please tell me about other interpretation software which show all kind of bonding between proteins and ligands.
is discovery studio more accurate then autodock4 ?
I have docked a ligand with a perticular receptor and obtained the most stable 10 binding place. i need to visualize the binding site using pymol and i only can input pdb files to pymol. how can i make pdb containing both the receptor and ligand docked to a particulate place.i have found a way to do that using autodock tools.
thank you.
I have synthesized few heterocyclic compounds which show good cytotoxicity against MCF7 cell line in the in-vitro assay (i.e., MTT assay). Now for in-silico molecular docking study, I am not sure which receptor should I choose? In some literature, the receptor protein selection is made by using the binding affinity database (e.g., Thomson Reuters MetaDrug). My question here is that to link the in-vitro study to in-silico study how to choose the receptor protein for molecular docking study?
I am now using Autodock Tools and Autodock 4 to figure out the interaction of ligand-protein.
However, there is a problem I have to face now is that the Zn in the protein has 0 charge instead of +2 charge
How I can add charge in to this atom using Autodock 4 PROCEDURE?
Spending much time on this but still not figure out. Im hopeful of your help. Thank you.
While going through various articles, I found the common practice of selecting a particular chain over others if a protein is in multimeric form. In this regard, I have the following questions
1) Is there any rule regarding which chain should be kept and which one should be deleted.
2) Since we mimic biological molecule in docking study to find the binding mode then how far it is valid to select only particular chain of the protein. Moreover, what if we took the whole protein pdb for docking study?
I am using Gold to dock the Maybridge fragment library into the PDE4b target. I use Chemscore for docking and ASP for rescoring (as suggested by the program template for phosphodiesterases). I have decided to begin with a fast screening. My question is how can I use the scores of the initial screening to filter out some compounds and redock the selected ones in a slower more accurate way?
Hace unos días realicé un curso donde se corría el proceso a través de autodock 4, sin embargo, me recomendaron usar vina. ¿Cuál es la diferencia a nivel de ejecución?
A few days ago I did a course where the process was corrected through Autodock 4, however, I was recommended to use vina. What is the difference at the execution level?
Hello everyone,
I am a new student in the Bioinformatics world. I have this assignment where I used different docking tools, such as AutoDock 4, DSX-CSD and -PDB, Vina, GOLD and Xscore.
A part of this project we were asked to figure out a consensus scoring function for ligand-protein complexes where their best RMSD values exceeded 2 Å. RMSD values and scores from these three tools should be used in this scoring function; AutoDock, DSX-CSD and DSX-PDB as shown in the file in the attachment.
I should use this consensus score function to bring one of the RMSD values less than 2 Å to the top of the list, as a best pose.
My question is, how do I do that? Is there a specific way to solve this kind of problems?
Your help is greatly appreciated.
I have modelled the structure using both ChemDraw and MarvinSketch separately. The structures were recognised as correct. However, once submitted into AutoDock, the torsion tree root cannot be detected and the Ir atom is marked as unknown, this is followed by failure to set the map types and eventually to run the simulation. I've tried using SwissDock, however once I submit the ligand, I am asked to review the topology. I have used the PRODRG server, however the Ir atom is not recognised by this software. Anyone has come across this sort of struggle?
I've modified the parameters file and managed to launch autogrid. It's been a few hours already, where most tutorial examples take 20 mins.
How should I rename the ‘Zn’ as ‘M’ and provide energy coefficients for Zn in Autodock Tools? I have just started with autodock tools. My protein has Zn ion in it. In the tutorial, it says something about Grid macromolecules.
"ADT also determines the types of atoms in the
macromolecule. AutoDock can accommodate up to 7 atom
types in the macromolecule. It uses a standard set with two
customizable types, ‘X’ and ‘M’. If your macromolecule has a
non-standard atom type, ADT will prompt you to set up a
customizable type X or M for it by entering energy parameters.
For example, Zn is not in the standard set. If your
macromolecule has Zn, for AutoDock you have to rename the
‘Zn’ as ‘M’ and provide energy coefficients for Zn. ‘X’ can
be used as a second customizable type. It is not possible to
have more than 7 types in the macromolecule."
I do not know how to rename and give charge to Zn. Every time I try to save the file as .pdbqt, it gives 0.000 to Zn. [WARNING: These atoms have zero charge: Zn].
I tried using a PDB file editor, but I always do something wrong.
If someone could help in this aspect.
Thank you very much in advance.
I synthesized some novel heterocycles which shows a particular in-vitro bioactivity. After this, I decided to go for its docking study. Synthesized heterocycles are in the racemic mixture; also the in-vitro bioactivity is assessed by using a racemic mixture. My question is, for docking purpose is it necessary to use each and every individual from the racemic mixture one by one or the individual single isomer structure (among its racemic mixture) after energy minimization is sufficient? Out of this which method is correct?
(For energy minimization I used ChemDraw program)
the error in autodock read like this. autogrid4: ERROR: Grid data file need the extention .fld for AVS input
could you help me to fix this issue?
Is there a way to choose the site where we want to place the grid box using the command line?
When creating the grid parameter file in ADT, in the graphical interface, you go to Grid ---> Grid Box --> Center. Then you have to chose to center the grid box in either: 1) Pick an atom 2) Center on ligand 3) Center on macromolecule 4) On a named atom. Therefore, it is possible to chose to center the grid box in the ligand.
My question is how can you do it (chose the position of the grid box) with the command line? Is there a script that I could use? There is no option in the grid parameter file. I have more than 10000 compounds and it would take me a really big amount of time to do it graphically. Then, I would like to automatate the process. Is there a way that I can do it?
I am going to do rescoring which means that the grid will not be in the same place of the ligand automatically.
Dear friends.. I have a question about autodock. I was wondering if some of you might help.
What is the parameter you use in the docking parameter file (.dpf) to perform rigid docking?
For instance, there is a parameter in the docking parameter file (.dpf):
move ligandG.pdbqt # small molecule
that refers to the ligand but it is indicating that the docking should be flexible.
What parameter can I use or what can I do to perform rigid doking?
Is there some parameter that allows me to point out the ligand (ligand.pdbqt) without having to order the program to move it?
I have a problem with pdb files edited with pspad text editor. When I make any change and save the file it cannot be read even if I retrieved the change and save again to make the file typically as it was before any change. In other words, what is wrong with saving the changed file?
I'would be grateful if someone helped me .
Thanks in advance...
I am running AutoDockTools 1.5.6 under Windows 7 (32-bit, in Spanish).
During running autogrid4 I encounter the ERROR: can't find or open receptor PDBQT file "Protein.pdbqt".
I followed almost all suggestions I found in Internet but nothing works. Any help would be appreciated.
I am new to docking and have been following a rigid docking procedure using AUTODOCK 4. I have received an error while saving the docking parameter file. The error message is attached here. I have one more question too, how do we know that Autodock has finished running?
My ligand and receptor don't exist in RCSBPDB and the PDB protein structure has been taken by the protein structure suggested by the phyre2 and my ligand has 62 aa. When I run autogrid it runs properly, but cannot run the Autodock.
Can anyone explain why am I facing these problems in running autodock?
When i tried to dock im windows cmd shows Error: could not open "conf.txt" for reading. I have tried to change the path for cmd e.c.t, but it was not helping. And i tried to change from program file to AutoDock folder also, then too its not working..My system configu is 500GB hard disk, 4GB ram, I5 intel core processor running in windows 7. please do kindly help me with this error. i have attached the picture of the error in cmd and my ligand and receptor with the config file..
thank you.

Dear All,
The ligand which we have selected for our docking studies contain a Platinum atom, whose parameters need to be defined prior to docking. In this regard, could you please suggest a way to get parameters for Platinum atom type, given the fact that AutoDock version 4.0 has parameters only for H, C, N, O, F, Mg, P, S, Cl, Ca, Mn, Fe, Zn, Br and I.
I am using PyRx interface for running AutoDock 4.2 After docking I get .dlg files as usual. now i wish to create complexes of poses obtained from dlg file.
There are these two python scripts to get this job done. (to extract the docked configurations from dlg file using the script "write_all_complex.py" can be used. This script will write the ligand - receptor complex coordinates into pdbqt format. subsequently, "pdbqt_to_pdb.py" script can be used to convert the pdbqt files into pdb.) But these scripts are known to run via ADT (Not through PyRx).
So my question is that is it possible to run these scripts independently (like using python GUI like IDLE) and obtain results without using ADT.
I would be grateful if some one provide me with these two scripts since i am not using ADT. Or is there any other easy means to generate complex of poses obtained in dlg file and protein used as target in docking run.
Dear All,
I have a structure which has a covalent link between Asp of enzyme and aldehyde group of glucose where I want to do docking calculation without distracting this covalent link. To do this have tried is as follows:
1. I removed the crystal ligand along with covalent linked residue,waters and added hydrogens during receptor preparation.
2.I kept the ligand along with covalently liked residue(flexible) as ligand for ligand preparation.
3. Set the grid around the selection (which contain ligand along with covalently link residue)
4. Ran the docking calculation by using autodock vina.
5. After calculation I superimpose the docked poses against crystal ligand which is exactly same as original.
Everything is fine but I am not sure this is correct way of doing it. So, If someone has experience in doing covalent docking kindly correct me with some suggestion.
Thanking you in advance
I wish to perform docking study with iron oxide (Fe2O3) nanoparticle. Is there a database or tool to obtain this?
I attempt study to perform docking for a protein that have metal ion as co-factor. The method as link gave excellent response to me but i cannot use because it is not free program for long times. For autodock, docking was followed by http://autodock.scripps.edu/. The program notify that Calcium ion have zero chrage when i prepare receptor in pdbqt format shown in fig 1. I modify charge +2 by text editor program shown in fig 2. After process, autodock shown binding energy = -3.78 if modified charge +2 and -3.93 if not modified. This is the correct way or not? If the way is right. Why binding energy is incompatible with wet lab that shown binding of protein with ligand after calcium ion was added.
Thank you very much for all answer and suggestion.


Then I cannot run autogrid4 when I did in the terminal.The extension .dpf was not generated.
Then tried to run auto dock in terminal. It appeared as;
autodock4: can't find or open parameter file 3.dpf
autodock4: Unsuccessful Completion.
How can I fix this problem? Thank you very much.
Hello everyone..
I am new in autodock4 and when i am preparing the ligand as pdbqt ( add polaronly, computing Gasteiger charges and merge non-polar), i am getting warning msg that say (these atoms have zero charge: Re Cl) .
so when i open this PDBQT file by ADT, i see that some bonds have not visualised, as Re-Cl , Re-N
am unable to understand how to plot these bonds ??
please help me
I am unable to run Autogrid command by cygwin. Is there anybody know the right commands to work in cygwin.
I performed a docking between a cyclodextrin and a ligand using Auto Dock 4.2.
After completion of the job, I got a binding energy (after the step write complex and play rank by energy) with out any unit ! There is no any clear direction in the Auto Dock 4.2 used guide. Can anyone guide me with the energy unit please?
Hello
I am a pharmacy student, who is a beginner in using Autodock. While autogrid4 was running by my order, it showed this message...
"warning: attempt to divide by zero was just prevented"
So, I want to know what's wrong in my order and how to solve this problem.
Regards
Suman Chanyoung
Hi every body
I am a beginner in docking and have some questions.please help me in detail.
1- what considerations might be taken into account to have a docking with RMSD lower than 2?I have done a docking but the RMSDs are between 0.5 -15 , and I dont know where I am wrong. please help me.
2- if a docking is done and the reported RMSDs are some large and some small, does the docking validate? May use just small RMSD and ignore the big ones?
3- if the lowest binding energy corresponds to a large RMSD, then the next lowest binding energy with favorable RMSD should be taken into account?
best regards.
please tell how to perform multiligand simultaneous docking with autodock4. and also analyze the result.
Docking of Gold complex using Auto dock:please how and where can i locate parameter files in auto dock ADT 4.2
I have made docking using Autodock vina and used Chimera to visualize the results (the docked ligands inside the protein active site). I was able to visualize hydrogen bond interactions, but I need to visualize hydrophobic interactions between hydrophobic parts in the ligand and the protein.
I ran AutoDock 4 via PyRx. I got this error: "AttributeError: Docking instance has no attribute 'ligMol'."
How do I solve it?
I wish to do some molecular docking using AutoDock4.2 softaware. But I do not know how to calculate the free energy of binding of a complex. Can anyone suggest me a way to do the free energy calculations using any software?
Can I take the docking result of autodock vina (ligand receptor complex) in pdb format for simulation in desmond?
When I run autodock command, I am getting the following error?
"Unknown ligand atom type "D";
add parameters for it to the parameter library first!"
Please help me!!
when i did docking with autodock (using command mode), I got one set of RMSD values (referred to as refRMS) in protein.dlg file under RMSD Table section. There is also a python program in AutoDock Tools ("compute_rms_between_conformations.py") in Utilities folder which gives RMSD values. These values differ. (e.g. between ligand.pdbqt and ligand_1.pdbqt, RMSD using python code gives value as 2.9117 and refRMS in protein.dlg file has value of 1.67).
Can someone please help me to know why these values differ and how both these values are calculated?
For example to dock a silver molecule to a receptor in various size ranges from 10nm,20nm,50nm,100nm e.t.c. Is it possible to do so in the docking software in place of ligands?
could anybody kindly guide me so as to what to do next ?
Hi everybody,
I'm using Autodock4.2 and I have taken these steps respectively. Can anyone assure me that I have been on the right path? I'm concerning about "spacing" and the accuracy of each step, especially the big spacing and box size in the first step.
-step1 (whole molecule):
NELEMENTS=108*94*126 & Spacing=0.755
-step2 (focusing on docked part from step1):
NELEMENTS=126*126*126 & Spacing=0.316
-Step3 (set flexible amino acid at the binding site from step2): NELEMENTS=106*84*80 & Spacing=0.375
Thanks
I am working with autodock vina for virtual screening and docking. Autodock vina generates conformers for multiple ligands. I want to make the complex of these conformers with receptor. e.g. I have 100 .pdbqt files for vina output for conformers and one receptor pdbqt file. By running command-
cut -c-66 inh*.pdbqt > inh*.pdb
I can convert inh*.pdbqt to pdb, but I have to do this individually for all ligands (* here are random numbers from pubchem database).
With command-
cat Receptor.pdbqt inh*.pdb | grep -v '^END ' | grep -v '^END$' > complex.pdb
With this command the pdb of complex of receptor and ligand is generated, but again this I have to do for each ligand, receptor file is fixed in this case.
I want a bash script for above to commands to run in cygwin. Aim is to use multiple ligand files - convert them to pdb - merge with receptor.pdbqt - generate multiple complexes as per ligand names.
This may need a simple script. Though I have worked with many scripts I don't know how to write such bash scripts. Naively, I have given a try and wrote one script-
#!/bin/bash
for f in inh*.pdbqt; do b=`basename $f .pdbqt`;
$b; mkdir -p data02; cut -c-66 inh*.pdbqt > inh*.pdb;
cat 3V3VN.pdbqt inh*.pdb | grep -v '^END' | grep -v '^END$' > complex*.pdb;
$f --out data02/$f.pdbqt --log data02/$f.txt; done
(I have tried it from the VS02.bash script, http://www.bioinformation.net/006/97320630006387.pdf)
It generates the complex but only one complex with all ligands in it !!!
Can anyone write or suggest the script for this problem?
When I run Autogrid4 from terminal I get a warnings like
Found an H-bonding atom with three bonded atoms, atom serial number 479 Found an H-bonding atom with three bonded atoms, atom serial number 888 Found an H-bonding atom with three bonded atoms, atom serial number 889
I need to run docking protocol for Protein-ion. More precisely my required ion is Copper(II). Can you suggest an appropriate protocol as well as the tool with which it should be implemented.
I can not make flexible and rigid.pdbqt files of DNA. I can not select sugar and nucleotides separately .
I am trying to dock a ligand with DNA using autodock. In the preparation of flexible and rigid DNA, how should I choose and what code to be given? As in protein, interactions of amino acids in binding site can be known and can give as for example: ARG16. My ligand is a DNA intercalator.
Anymore suggestions in parameter optimizations for DNA-Ligand docking using Autodock?
During preparation of .pdbqt file I had a warning like that : Total kollman charge added = -166.952. What's that? explain please.