Authenticity - Science topic

I would be grateful to you if you can tell me what you know authentically about it. Please don't mince words.

This is a common and demanding question asked from the young resaechers on daily basis. They want to conduct the research in an effective and authentic manner. The goal is to conduct a valuable research that can contribute to the well-being of humanity.

I want all the professional researchers here to contribute to this and share your precious insights on this topic.

Our new article explores how generative AI, when ethically implemented, can support educational integrity. By aligning AI with educational theories like constructivism and Self-Determination Theory (SDT), we argue that AI can promote personalized, meaningful learning and foster student autonomy and intrinsic motivation. Key ethical considerations are highlighted, including the need for transparency, respect for privacy, and fairness to ensure AI empowers students while preserving trust and data integrity. These principles create a foundation for using AI in ways that support, rather than undermine, academic honesty. For educators, this framework offers insights into reshaping assessment and learning practices responsibly in the AI era.

We invite you to read our article to explore these points in depth and learn how AI might become a valuable tool in fostering integrity-driven education.

Key Points and Discussion Prompts:

Below are the links to the paper on ResearchGate and Frontiers, respectively:

OR

Ensure to do these :

Wrap up the interview and write the transcripts on the same day of interview (let your memory help you here) , you can keep responses authentic by focusing on minimal editing for clarity only- do not go for detailed explanations of the interview, focus on having the abridge versions for discussion, and by conducting validation checks with stakeholders or other fellow researchers to confirm that cleaned data reflects their intended meaning (Patton, 2002).

"How can digital marketing strategies be leveraged to promote and preserve cultural heritage sites, artifacts, and traditions while ensuring authenticity, respect for local communities, and sustainable tourism practices?"

This question encompasses several critical considerations in the digital marketing of cultural heritage, including:

1. Authentic Storytelling and Content Creation: How can digital marketing efforts authentically convey the unique history, significance, and cultural value of heritage sites and artifacts through compelling storytelling, multimedia content, and immersive experiences?

2. Community Engagement and Empowerment: How can digital marketing initiatives involve and empower local communities, indigenous groups, and cultural stakeholders in the storytelling and promotion of their heritage, ensuring that their voices and perspectives are respectfully represented?

3. Sustainable Tourism Promotion: What digital marketing strategies can be employed to promote responsible and sustainable tourism practices, encouraging visitors to engage with cultural heritage in a respectful and environmentally conscious manner?

4. Accessibility and Inclusivity: How can digital marketing initiatives ensure that cultural heritage content and experiences are accessible to diverse audiences, including people with disabilities, international visitors, and individuals from different cultural backgrounds?

5. Preservation and Conservation Advocacy: In what ways can digital marketing be used to raise awareness about the importance of preserving and conserving cultural heritage sites, artifacts, and traditions, and mobilize support for conservation efforts?

6. Ethical Considerations in Digital Representation: How can digital marketing of cultural heritage navigate ethical considerations related to the representation, interpretation, and commercialization of heritage, ensuring that it is presented in a respectful and culturally sensitive manner?

7. Digital Technologies for Heritage Interpretation: What role can emerging digital technologies, such as virtual reality, augmented reality, and interactive multimedia, play in enhancing the interpretation and presentation of cultural heritage, making it more engaging and accessible to a global audience?

8. Measuring Impact and Effectiveness: How can the impact of digital marketing efforts in promoting cultural heritage be measured, and what key performance indicators can be used to assess the success of these initiatives in terms of visitor engagement, conservation outcomes, and community benefit?

Addressing these questions is essential for stakeholders involved in the digital marketing of cultural heritage, including heritage organizations, museums, cultural institutions, tourism authorities, and digital marketing professionals, to ensure that the promotion and preservation of cultural heritage are approached with sensitivity, integrity, and a focus on long-term sustainability.

in terms of local and foreign brands example in foods like rice how do they see it

My academic pursuits align with my broader goal of connecting traditional cultural expressions with modern pedagogical methods, ensuring that future generations can experience and appreciate authentic cultural heritage. This is particularly important in a time when cultural traditions are increasingly vulnerable to the pressures of modernity. I am committed to finding solutions that honor both the preservation of heritage and the evolving needs of today’s education systems.

MOLECULAR MARKER

molecular method

Despite the fact that AI holds a mass amount of opportunities to improve learning and change the old school education, its integration in modern learning and careful regulation to reduce the risks of academic dishonesty ensure ethical application in promoting authentic student growth

I want to use ReverseDock for off-target analysis in molecular docking. How authenticate and reliable are the results of ReverseDock and can I put those results in my research paper ?

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) has emerged as a critical factor in shaping brand image perception among various stakeholder groups. Research indicates that CSR initiatives can significantly enhance a company's reputation and brand image when implemented authentically and strategically. For instance, a study by Martínez et al. (2014) found a strong positive correlation between consumers' perception of CSR and both functional and affective aspects of brand image[1]. This suggests that companies engaging in genuine CSR efforts can effectively improve their overall brand perception among customers.

The impact of CSR extends beyond customers to other key stakeholder groups, including employees, shareholders, and broader community stakeholders. Employees, in particular, play a crucial role in this dynamic. When companies involve employees in CSR activities and communicate their efforts effectively, it can lead to increased job satisfaction, loyalty, and pride in the organization. This, in turn, can transform employees into brand ambassadors, further enhancing the company's image externally[1]. For shareholders, CSR initiatives can signal long-term value creation and risk mitigation, potentially improving their perception of the brand and its future prospects.

However, it is essential to note that the positive influence of CSR on brand image is contingent upon avoiding greenwashing or superficial green labeling. Authenticity and transparency in CSR efforts are crucial for building trust and credibility among all stakeholder groups. As Bianchi et al. (2019) highlight, a company's reputation and international presence play a significant role in shaping consumer perceptions and attitudes toward the brand[1]. Therefore, to maximize the positive impact of CSR on brand image, companies must ensure their initiatives are genuine, aligned with their core business values, and effectively communicated to all stakeholder groups. This approach can lead to a more robust and positive brand image across customers, employees, shareholders, and the broader community.

Is anyone familiar with 4th International Conference on Applied Science & Engineering or any of their previous conferences? I've been invited as a speaker, can anyone speak to the authenticity of this invitation?

I want to ensure it is not a hijacked journal. While the journal appears professional and is indexed in Scopus, the prevalence of hijacked journals makes me cautious.

Could anyone confirm whether the "Journal of Applied Bioanalysis" is legitimate or provide any insights into its authenticity? Any experiences with submissions or knowledge of its current status would be greatly appreciated.

Green publisher

Interesting comment, posted on a recent research document.

So I've laid out a few steps of authentication, based off of my mathematical, and physics-based education, and consulting with various other associates.

This is something being studied for peer review and an upcoming conference. The challenge is this:

Lots of people in research gate have their own and unique theories. There's lots of technical discussion about the technicalities which may invalidate these theories, but in reality, invalidating or authenticating theories such as this is a highly rigorous process more akin to hard mathematics than it is to anything which can be put verbally.

Below is a comment for context and brevity. It was posted under a research gate paper.

After this context, a few standards for authentication will be laid out, and I would challenge anybody with their own theories to attempt to meet these standards.

Context:

"would like to extend congratulations to John, as anyone performing these calculations will also see as I did, that this theory is easily renormalizable at one Feynman loop, by my current calculations.

Anybody else who can verify this as well. It's either exactly at one loop, or around there, indicating high stability in versatile QM/GR scenarios and means it handles infinities that other popular theories such as String Theory Struggle with exceptionally well, among other implications.

It also means the applications of the actual elements of the framework structure are easily adaptable in many scenarios traditionally difficult, I.E, Early birth of the universe, large rotating black holes, ECT

This evidencing, that is part of a small group of theories, such as qed, string theory, loop Quantum gravity, and many others recently emerging, which have indicated high authentication rates for rigorous academic standards of how this would historically be addressed.

I'm investigating also, another colleague who seems to have a very robust framework indicating a similar confluence of being normalizablity, with just one Feynman loop also being currently calculated to renormalize his theory, this of course will take additional analysis from people beyond me, in the spirit of peer review.

We all need to remember that unilateral acceptance of a theory is unlikely due to the decentralized networks contrasting with what's allowed a theory such as quantum mechanics in general relativity to propagate.

I fully believe, that there is a range of unified theories possible, all based off of competent identification of similar mathematical principles, and general principles, with a range of uses and complexity all adhering to these principles based off of personal development and usage needs.

Zero sum thinking it is absurd in this matter, attempting to invalidate theories such as this based off of a small and minor inconsistency does not hold up to rigorous academic standards of how one would systematically and historically address how a theory could be considered a functioning Unified theory.

This type of thinking, with the cognitive dissonance that continues to refuse acknowledging that even theories like quantum mechanics and general relativity have inconsistencies and are still very valuable.

We could pretend to invalidate these Frameworks based off of a small and general technicalities as well. But this would be foolish, which is why the zero sum thinking is the bane of science. Imagine, if a logic of a small inconsistency in validating an entire framework, such as his common here on Research a, was applied to General relativity, seeing his quantum mechanics was already prevalent at the moment it came out.

Fact of the matter is, authenticating unified theories boils down to something more akin to hard mathematics, and cannot be invalidated by simple verbal English phrases of potential technical inconsistencies. It's far more advanced, and complicated than that, and no matter what you say, you're not going to be able to invalidate or supersede at the mathematical authentications needed to validate theories such as this,.

Again, if you apply that logic to conflicting theories such as quantum mechanics in general relativity, the argument becomes an inherently illogical. Especially if any point made to argue this is based on quantum mechanics or general relativity.

The dissonance, of when it is acceptable to ignore a certain technicalities, and when it isn't, based off of what other people are championing, is beyond ridiculous. If you apply this to even the inconsistencies and quantum mechanics in general relativity, you can pretend that all of our advancements in these areas in the past 40 years didn't matter.

We act as though just because things like certain inconsistencies in Quantum mechanics, General relativity, and string theory, some of the most major theories done integrate, that they're not still utilizable and good efforts. Seems to be a dissonance, and when this logic is applied to popular theories versus one that is developed by somebody less or known, or a less widely accepted theory.

There will not be one, once we start seeing the greater Mosaic of understanding will all move forward.

such as String Theory Struggle with, among other implications."

In lieu of this, here are the standards I challenge people to meet, when attempting to authenticate their own theories, and post the results here if you want to:

Computational Verification:

1. Numerical Simulations:

Use of computational models to simulate theoretical predictions and compare them against experimental data.

Algorithmic Consistency: Ensuring that the algorithms used in simulations and calculations are robust and produce consistent results.

2. High-Energy Experiments

Particle Colliders: Utilizing facilities like the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) to test predictions about particle interactions at high energies. It's going to also include matching up with their data from repositories.

Detector Sensitivity: Ensuring that detectors are sensitive enough to observe rare or subtle phenomena predicted by the theory.

3. Standard Classical Experiments

Reproducibility: Experiments must be reproducible by independent researchers under the same conditions.

Precision Measurements: High precision measurements to test the predictions of the theory, such as those in electromagnetism and gravity.

4. Quantum Verification

Wave Function Analysis: Verifying that the theory’s predictions about quantum states and their evolution match experimental observations.

Entanglement and Superposition: Testing predictions about quantum entanglement and superposition through experiments like the double-slit experiment.

5. Computational Authentication

Feynman Loop Calculations: Performing and verifying one-loop (and higher-loop) Feynman diagram calculations to ensure the theory is renormalizable.

Normalization Data: Comparing the renormalization data against known standards to ensure consistency.

Feynman Loop Validation: Validating the theory through detailed calculations of Feynman loops to ensure mathematical consistency.

6. Logical and Theoretical Framework Consistency

Group Theory and Symmetry: Ensuring that the theory adheres to established symmetries and group structures, such as those in the Standard Model (e.g., SU(3)xSU(2)xU(1)).

Lorentz Invariance: Maintaining Lorentz invariance in the regions where special relativity holds

Predictive Power and Experimental Validation

Predictions of New Phenomena: The theory should predict new phenomena that can be tested and potentially falsified by experiments.

Data Compatibility: Predictions must be compatible with existing experimental data, and any deviations must be accounted for and explained.

7. Peer Review and Publication

Publishing in Reputable Journals: The theory must be published in peer-reviewed journals where it can be scrutinized by the scientific community. Alternatively, to avoid gatekeeping, this can be done by simply consulting with experts in the field, which are within your peer network, and having them verify the work in some sort of documentable way.

Transparency and Collaboration: Maintaining transparency in methods and data, and encouraging collaborative efforts to test and validate the theory.

8. Research-Based Comparison

Comparison Against Known Models: Conducting research-based comparisons against known models that have low loop consistency to highlight the advantages of the new theory.

I was wondering if you would care to share your thoughts on:

Regards,

Yawar

I want to know what has happened to the concept of originality of architectural work in digital reproductions, has it disappeared or is it evolving with a new concept?

I am reviewing a paper for ANSYS application in Shape Memory Alloys snice the access denied for Our country to the web site is there a chance or a possibility there is a Margene of error in the results of Piracy's copy of Ansys

I have isolated granulosa cells from mice ovary using puncture method. Cells are healthy and growing in DMEM. Their morphology is same as granulosa cells. However I would like to use a molecular markers or Immunohistochemistry method to authenticate them further, before downstream use. Can anyone suggest the best methods and markers for the same ?

it is some Indian site.

Hi,

I intend to publish my article in the journal: Journal of Contemporary Issues in Business and Government

(Although websites suggest it is a legitimate journal, and i have verified the ISSN number)

However, Their have been frequent suspicious actions on part of the journal (Such as rapid requests for payments, recently changed website , and acceptance without review).

Can an expert please advise.

Below is the link for the journal:

some data shows direct and some inverse relation?

kindly share any authentic paper please.

Dear colleagues,

I require urgent assistance regarding the authenticity of the "Plasma Science and Technology" journal. Upon investigation, I found two websites bearing the same name and ISSN number "ISSN: 1009-0630":

This discovery raises concerns about the legitimacy of one of these platforms. I seek your expertise in discerning the genuine journal from any potential fraudulent counterpart.

Your prompt assistance in clarifying this matter is greatly appreciated.

Warm regards,

I begin my cosmologically metaphysical critique of the foundations of Heidegger’s work, with a statement of concern. Anyone who attempts to read this work without first reading my arguments in the book, Physics without Metaphysics?, (1) without being in favour of a new science-compatible metaphysics and concept of To Be, and (2) without a critical attitude to Heidegger – is liable to misunderstand my arguments here as misinformed, denigrative, or even trivial. But I do this critique in search of very general means of constructing a metaphysics capable of realising constant guidance and enhancement to scientific practice.

Contemporary mathematics, physics, cosmology, biology, and the human sciences have a shape after undergoing so much growth that we cannot think philosophically without admitting the existence (termed “To Be”) of all that exist, the cosmos and its parts. The general concept of existence is always as “something-s” that are processually out there, however far-fetched our concepts of the various parts of or of the whole cosmos are. “The existence of the totality (Reality-in-total) as the whole something whatever” and “particular existence in the minimally acceptable state of being something/s whatever that is not the whole totality” are absolutely trans-subjective and thus objectual presuppositions behind all thought.

Today we do not have to theoretically moot any idea of non-existence of the cosmos and its parts as whatever they are. This is self-evident. That is, basing philosophical thinking – of the very nature of the existence-wise metaphysical presuppositions of all that are subjective and objective – upon the allegedly subjective origin of thought processes and concepts – should be universally unacceptable.

Therefore, I think we should get behind Heidegger’s seemingly metaphysical words – all based on the human stage on which Being is thought – by chipping his prohibitively poetical and mystifying language off its rhetorically Reality-adumbrating shades, in order to get at the senses and implications of his Fundamental Ontology as Being-historical Thinking. It suffices here to admit that the history of Being is not the general concept of the history of the thought of Being, and not the history of the thought of Being.

Moreover, it is not a necessity for philosophy that the Humean-Kantian stress on the subject-aspect of thought be carried forward to such an extent that whatever is thought has merely subjectively metaphysical Ideal presuppositions. All subjective presuppositions must somehow be taken to possess the merely subjective character.

There are, of course, presuppositions with some conceptual character. But to the extent some of them are absolute, they are to be taken as absolutely non-subjective. These presuppositions are applicable without exception to all that is, e.g. To Be and all Categories that may be attributed to all that exist. HENCE, SUBJECTIVE PRESUPPOSITIONS ARE NOT A SUBSTITUTE FOR CONCEPTUAL PRESUPPOSITIONS.

This fact should be borne out while doing philosophy, without which no philosophy and science are possible. The weight of the subject-aspect continues to be true of thought insofar as we go to non-absolute details of metaphysical presuppositions and empirical details, and not when we think only of the metaphysical Ideals of all existents in themselves.

It is true that there is no complete chipping off of the merely subjective or anthropological aspect of the Heideggerian theory. Nor is there an analysis without already interpreting anything. The guiding differentiation here should be that between “the subjective” and the “conceptual”. The conceptual is not merely subjective, but also objective. It is objective due to the inheritance pattern behind it from the objectual.

Such a hermeneutic is basic to all understanding, speculation, feeling, and sensing. The linguistically and otherwise symbolic expression of concepts and their concatenations is to be termed as the denotative universals and their concatenations.

At the purely conceptual level we have connotation. These are purely conceptual universals and their concatenations. Since these are not merely a production of the mind but primarily that by the involvement of the generated data from the little selection of the phenomena from physical processes, which are from a highly selected group of levels of objectual processes, which belong to the things themselves.

At the level of the phenomena, levels of objectual processes, and the things themselves there are universals, which we shall term ontological universals and their conglomerations. These conglomerations are termed so because they have the objectual content at the highest level available within the processes of sensing, feeling, understanding, speculation, etc.

The above should not necessarily mean (1) that we cannot base thought fully on the Metaphysical Ideals of “To Be” and “the state of existents as somethings”, and (2) that we cannot get sufficiently deep into the fundamental implications of his work by side-lining the purely subjective concepts of the fundamental metaphysical concepts. This claim is most true of the concept of To Be.

To Be is the simultaneously processual-verbal and nomic-nominal aspect of Reality-in-total, and not merely that of any specific being, phenomenon, or concept. For Heidegger, To Be (Being) is somehow a private property of Dasein, the Being-thinking being. To Be which is the most proper subject matter of Einaic Ontology (metaphysics based completely on the trans-thought fact of the Einai, “To Be” of Reality-in-total) is not the Being that Dasein thinks or the Being that is given in Dasein, because To Be belongs to Reality-in-total together and in all its parts.

Even in Heidegger’s later phase highlighted best by his Contributions to Philosophy: From Enowning, his concept of To Be as belonging to the Dasein which is the authentically Being-thinking human being has not changed substantially. Even here he continues to project positively the history of Being-thinking human being as the authentic Being-historical process and as the essence of the history of all that can be thought of.

Against the above metaphysical backdrop of essentially anthropocentric definitions, I write this critique based on cosmological-metaphysical necessities in philosophy, and indirectly evaluate what I consider as the major ontological imperfection in Heidegger’s thought from the viewpoint of the Categorial demands of the history of metaphysics, various provincial ontologies and scientific ontology, and of the way in which I conceive the jolts and peaks in such history.

Along with the purely meta-metaphysical To Be, (1) I present the metaphysical abstract notions of Extension (= compositeness: i.e., having parts) and Change (= impacts by composites: i.e., part-to-part projection of impact elements) as the irreducibly metaphysical Categories of all existents and (2) argue that Extension-Change existence in their non-abstract togetherness as existents is nothing but Universal Causation (= everything is Existence-Change-wise existent, i.e. if not universally causal, existence is vacuous).

These are metaphysical principles that Heidegger and most philosophers till today have not recognized the primordiality of. Most of them tend to fix to existence universal or partial or absolutely no causality. In short, Universal Causation, even in some allegedly non-causal aspects of cosmology, quantum physics, philosophy of mind, and human sciences, is to be the taken as a priorias and co-implied by existence (To Be), because anything existent is extended and changing...! No more should sciences or philosophy doubt Universal Causality. Herein consists the merit of Einaic Ontology as a universally acceptable metaphysics behind all sciences – not merely of human sciences.

To Be is the highest Transcendental Ideal; Reality-in-total is the highest Transcendent Ideal; and Reality-in-general is the highest Transcendental-Transcendent Ideal of generalized theoretical concatenation of ontological universals in consciousness. These are meta-metaphysical in shape. They are not at all classificational (categorizing) of anything in this world or in thought.

Although Heidegger has not given a Categorial scheme of all existents or Categorial Ideals for all metaphysics and thinking, he is one of the few twentieth century thinkers of ontological consequence, after Aristotle (in favour of an abstract concept of Being) and Kant (against treating the concept of Being as an attribute), to have dealt extensively with a very special concept of Being and our already interpretive ability to get at To Be.

I present here in gist the difference between the Dasein-Interpreted concept of Being and the ontologically most widely committed, Einaic Ontological, nomic-nominal, and processual-verbal concept of To Be, which should be metaphysically the highest out-there presupposition of all thought and existence. This is the relevance of metaphysics as a trans-science.

Bibliography

(1) Gravitational Coalescence Paradox and Cosmogenetic Causality in Quantum Astrophysical Cosmology, 647 pp., Berlin, 2018.

(2) Physics without Metaphysics? Categories of Second Generation Scientific Ontology, 386 pp., Frankfurt, 2015.

(3) Causal Ubiquity in Quantum Physics: A Superluminal and Local-Causal Physical Ontology, 361 pp., Frankfurt, 2014.

(4) Essential Cosmology and Philosophy for All: Gravitational Coalescence Cosmology, 92 pp., KDP Amazon, 2022, 2nd Edition.

(5) Essenzielle Kosmologie und Philosophie für alle: Gravitational-Koaleszenz-Kosmologie, 104 pp., KDP Amazon, 2022, 1st Edition.

Blockchain and artificial intelligence (AI)" refers to the convergence of these two technologies, which brings new value to business through authenticity, augmentation and automation.

Blockchain is a shared, immutable ledger that provides an immediate, shared and transparent exchange of encrypted data simultaneously to multiple parties as they initiate and complete transactions. A blockchain network can track orders, payments, accounts, production and much more. Since permissioned members share a single view of the truth, they gain confidence and trust in their transactions with other businesses, along with new efficiencies and opportunities.

Artificial intelligence (AI) uses computers, data and sometimes machines to mimic the problem-solving and decision-making capabilities of the human mind. AI encompasses the sub-fields of machine learning and deep learning, which use AI algorithms that are trained on data to make predictions or classifications. The benefits of AI include automation of repetitive tasks, improved decision making and a better customer experience.

Combined values of blockchain and AI

Authenticity Blockchain’s digital record offers insight into the framework behind AI and the provenance of the data that it is using, addressing the challenge of explainable AI. This insight helps improve trust in data integrity and in the recommendations that AI provides. Using blockchain to store and distribute AI models provides an audit trail, and pairing blockchain and AI can enhance data security.

Augmentation AI can rapidly and comprehensively read, understand and correlate data at incredible speed, bringing a new level of intelligence to blockchain-based business networks. By providing access to large volumes of data from within and outside of the organization, blockchain helps AI scale to provide more actionable insights, manage data usage and model sharing, and create a trustworthy and transparent data economy.

Automation AI, automation and blockchain can bring new value to business processes that span multiple parties — removing friction, adding speed and increasing efficiency.

source: https://www.ibm.com/topics/blockchain-ai

I would like to hear your view on the relationship between authentic leadership and stress for those managers practicing (not working under someone who is authentic) authentic leadership ie if you are an authentic leader are you likely to have more or less stress. Would love to hear the scholarship that you are aware of that talks about this.

I have a concern regarding readjusting the intensities value of xrd data. In one the discussion in this platform, (the link is here- https://www.researchgate.net/post/What_could_be_the_reason_for_not_having_further_low_chi_square_value_better_agreement_in_my_refinement_result) it is said that the intensities value height can be readjusted to get good chi square value even though all the peaks are very well matched but the Chi square value is not low. Is this authentically correct or are we manipulating the data by resizing the height of the xrd peaks which we get. If it is correct, then who decides up to what resizing amount should the intensities be done/changed so to get good Chi square value?

I propose as a subject for a discussion the PDF-Powerpoint of the lecture "Analogies between Plotinus and Indian Philosophy" held on 1st March 2024 at the International Conference on Topic: Cultures in Transformation: A Subcontinental Experience International Conference organized by the Department of History in Collaboration with Northern Region Centre Indian Council of Social Science Research (ICSSR), 1-2 March 2024, Ram Lal Anand College, University of Delhi. I am working on a text connected to the PowerPoint. In my inquiry, I would like to expose some aspects of Plotinus’ thought which have, in my opinion, analogies with aspects of Indian Philosophy. I shall therefore concentrate my attention on Plotinus’ conception of the One, on the relations between One and multiplicity, on the separation of the individual from the One and on the return to the One. I shall then investigate the opposition expressed in the Upanishads between inauthentic reality and authentic reality, the initial position of the individual in the darkness and the return of the individual to the true dimension of reality. The individual’s ascent to the One in Plotinus and the liberation of the individual from the dimension of multiplicity will be a central theme of my exposition since it constitutes one of the analogies with some passages of the Upanishads in which the process of liberation of the individual from the ties of the average sense reality are described: the initial position of the individual as a position of decadence of the individual will be exposed by resorting to different passages of Plotinus’ Enneads.

The opposition between knowledge and opinion, on the one hand, and between intellect and sense perception, on the other hand, will be investigated in order to see the similarities with passages from the Upanishads in which the opportunity of a progressive detachment from the sense dimension is insisted on.

The common ground between Plotinus and the Upanishads proves to be the conception of philosophy as the revelation that the average way of living is inauthentic, that there is an authentic dimension of reality, that the individual ought to reach the authentic dimension of reality, and that a long process of training is needed for the individual to be able to reach the authentic dimension of reality. Furthermore, the description of the position of the One as an entity which is beyond all predicates can be analysed, in my opinion, with particular attention to the analogies which this subject can have with the descriptions of the nature of Brahman.

The main texts on which I will base my inquiry will be Plotinus’ Enneads, on the one hand, and the Upanishads, on the other hand.

Traditional student assessment does not achieve educational goals, so alternatives to assessment must be used

The effectiveness of a new species description hinges on the information it contains, particularly in terms of sufficiency and accuracy. Sufficiency is gauged by the amount of information pertaining to the morphological characters of the new species that allows a well-justified differentiation (textually asserted by the author) from its congeners. Accuracy refers to the alignment between the textual description and the authentic specimen. Such information can be conveyed, within a paper, in the form of either text or illustrations, or a combination of both.

The absence of advanced documentary techniques has necessitated an elaborative morphological description for new species in the past centruries, and a lack thatof renders a "poor" description that may hinder future studies by other researchers. In the absence of any form of illustrations, textual descriptions become the mere vehicle of information, with its sufficiency and accuracy largely deciding the convenience for further study. In the presence of hand-drawn illustrations, the description gains enhanced conceivability. However, hand-drawn illustrations are susceptible to biased accuracy. Modern technology allows the inclusion of photographs of the authentic specimen within paper, and the internet facilitates additional sources like webpage links to supplementary visuals (including videos).

Then, the question arises: considering the subjectivity in qualitative character descriptions and potential discordance between authors in quantitative character documentation, when sufficient photographs of the authentic specimen are available, is it still neccessary to provide a detailed "description" part for the new species?

Note that the premise demands sufficient and high-quality photographs as substitutions for textual descriptions, thus when the relevant equipments are unavaible, a detailed description remains pivotal. I can appreciate that some individuals may view the textual description as a formal assertion by the author, one that can be specifically addressed in subsequent studies.

I consistently offer a comprehensive species description because I believe it should be either highly concise or detailed. A succinct documentation can be achieved through the organization of a morphology matrix containing well-classified descriptors for straightforward comparison. The reason for posing this question stems from my occasional observation of complex or repetitive textual descriptions presented as blocks of paragraphs, occupying a substantial portion of the paper. Personally, I reckon that in the modern context, emphasis should be placed on other aspects that may be prone to errors, such as the examination procedure and between-species comparisons (due to subjectivity and sample sufficiency).

Dear Researchers,

Could anyone please let me know the authenticity of the following journal:

Journal of Oncology Research and Therapy

Abbreviation JONT

ISSN 2574-710X

Publication Type Peer Reviewed

Publishing Model Open Access

Impact Factor 4.32

DOI Prefix 10.29011/2574-710X

Journal Category Oncology Journals

Best regards

Dr. Bhuyan

Users may focus on its validity and authenticity.

...

هل يمكن للمملكه العربيه السعوديه ان تصل الى رؤيه 2030 وتحدو نفس حدو اليابان في الجمع بين الاصاله والمعاصره

Can anyone please share their feedback or review on the journal - Empirical Economics Letters (ISSN 1681 8997)? Can anyone confirm its authenticity and metrics? The articles published by the journal look really unstandardized, and their website looks questionable. I have also tried seeing their previous issues published only some have doi? is this journal predatory ?

Title:

Enhancing Privacy-Preserving Authentication through NIST, PCI, IETF, and ICANN Compliant Encryption and Zero-Knowledge Proofs

Abstract:

This proposal aims to develop an advanced mathematical framework for a third-party service provider to authenticate device users' activities while preserving privacy. The framework will utilize encrypted GPS coordinates and multi-factor authentication in compliance with NIST, PCI, IETF, and ICANN standards. It will focus on Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs) to maintain user privacy, exploring three distinct models: the plain model, the common random string model, and the random oracle model.

Introduction:

Standards and Compliance:

Methodology:

Expected Outcomes:

Significance:

I have heard that many predatory/fake groups organize international conferences and Magnus is one of them if anyone has previous experience of it. please share.

should I go to attend the conference or not??

How can I authenticate the measurements accuracy and precision of online downloaded software instrument.

Cougar represents the face of evolution so sunflower represents the phenomena of dominion like Gray's name in medicine and Grey's name in home entertainment of Oscar since Elizabeth Holmes is authenticity of the Grey's Anatomy of pine evolution and blood proprietary with magnolia tree seed pods insure mercury.

Please share experience with Archives of Nephrology and Urology journal. Is it authentic or fake/predatory.

Early Childhood

Primary

authentic commercial services for MD simulation, preferably in Pakistan

Is it not lowering the quality of education? What has been the purpose of exam invigilation over the years before the COVID-19 pandemic? Will their degrees be authentic? Will they not be half-baked? Is it not an online copy-paste game? What do you think?

Is measuring lexical density worth while? What are the uses of doing so? What different ways of measuring lexical density are there and which is the most authentic?

Dear Researchers,

It is generallized that below 6 Ghz known as sub-6 GHz.

On different articals and web links various ranges given for the sub-6 GHz band.

Some articles telling 410 MHz to 7100 MHz is the range of sub-6 GHz, whereas some closes this range to 4.4GHz.

Which range is authentic. can 4-7 GHz can be considered in sub-6 GHz.

Please help in this regard.

I have decided to launch a discussion on my text "The Drama of the Human Condition. Notes on the Causes and Origins of Evil in Plato's Republic", since the text is the basis of my interview "Il dramma della condizione umana nell'opera di Platone. (La idea del mal en Platón)", which will be broadcast on Friday, 2nd June at 3 p.m. CET on YouTube at the address: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Enba6HUJS84 I should like very much to thank Professor Tayron Achury and all the members of Ethos Filósofico for their invitation. This text has been published in the Revue Roumaine de Philosophie 63(1), pp.19-35 in June 2019. In my analysis, I deal with some causes and origins of evil and of moral degeneration in the human dimension. My analysis focuses on Plato's Republic. The origins and causes of the presence of injustice and of vice lie in the very structure of the human soul. The division of the soul into parts which are at least reciprocally independent of each other implies that there is the possibility that they are in conflict with each other. This is the origin of injustice and the root of every form of evil. The correct equilibrium among the parts of the soul, which, in my opinion, are to be interpreted as authentic potencies, can be achieved only by developing the rational part. This development requires a thorough education in philosophy. Throughout my analysis I quote passages in which Plato points out the presence of bad instincts and, in general, of a morally difficult component in our soul. The kind of soul considered in my analysis is the embodied soul.

From where I can get access metabolites profiling facility in India.

If anyone has any experience on this topic (metabolomic analysis) please response.

In the field of research, survey type research is very popular and widely used as a research method. But some times I felt that collecting data by closed ended questionnaire may lead to socially desirable responses or behavior, example - if anyone is conducting a research on "Current Status Professional Development of Secondary Teacher" and the researcher is putting questions about the activities like - Are you a enrolling in refresher courses, are you participating in seminar, workshop or Faculty development programme etc

Then the respondent here may answer in his positive side whether he/she is doing these activities or not (So these type of socially desirable behavior they are giving and happening also). It is very much affecting the authenticity of the data we got from our sample and what we report for the development of the society may be wrong and we are providing to some extend the wrong data. So how can we mitigate or limit or reduce this effect.

Please help me find authentic email address or phone no. of Herbarium Bogoriense.

I am looking for a public health research conference around the middle east

Hi,

I'd like to publish my already published journal article as a book. My article was published under a Creative Commons Attribution license. Is it possible to also find a well-known publisher who would publish my article? A couple of months back, a publisher from India offered to publish my article under a Creative Commons Attribution license as a text book in India, however, I declined their offer as I didn't trust the authenticity of their publications.

My question is: are their other well-known publishers who might publish my article, preferably in the Western world? As the publisher from India showed interest in publishing my article for their text book, I am very keen to know. Could you please also suggest some publishers, if possible?

My article examines how social media (SM) activeness affects the work-life balance of Bangladeshi white collar work force and suggests measures to reduce their negative and reinforce their positive aspects. Primary research has been conducted using an online questionnaire-based survey using judgement sampling. The study recommends several measures to reinforce the positive impacts and reduce the negative ones, and it was published in the SciMedCentral Archives of Palliative Care journal.

Citation: Mujeri, N. (2021). Social Media Activeness and Work-Life Balance in the Bangladesh Context: A Descriptive Study. Archives of Palliative Care.

Attached: journal article for your viewing.

Would it be possible to publish this journal article as a book? Would it impact the willingness of an editor to publish my work as a book? What do you think?

It would be great to hear your experience about publishing articles from your previously published journal articles and then making it into a book.

Thank you!

Neaz Mujeri

I have planed for animal experiments in India. We need a chemical reagent for our experiment, the cost of it is less in ChemFaces, Wuhan, China (https://m.chemfaces.com/) and the cost is slightly high in ChemScene (https://www.chemscene.com/). Which company among these two is very authentic, provides high-quality chemical compounds? Which chemical vendor can I place an order from?

Your suggestion will be of great help. Looking forward to hearing from you all

Majority of the teachers at present are not millennials. They are digital migrants who are able to still teach with the help of trainings and workshops. Many of them have limited awareness on the use of new gadgets and applications being utilized by students at present. With the emergence of Artificial Intelligence, and it being used by students, much more they become dependent on it from simple to most complicated school tasks and requirements. It is very challenging for teachers to identify which work is authentic, which are copied from what this technology is providing them. Therefore, I am thinking that a school policy specifically centered on the use of AI should be crafted and this must be initiated by school admin.

Can anyone please share their feedback or review on the journal - The Seybold report? I recently sent them an article which was accepted in 1 day. Can anyone confirm its authenticity and metrics?

As raw meat microbiological testing and raw meat species, molecular identification is required. is it necessary for raw meat and cooked meat DNA isolation and PCR to avoid cross-contamination and microbial contamination to use Biosafety cabinet type II? If it is necessary to use a biosafety cabinet then an authentic source document for this regard.

Friends, can you recommend an authentic pamphlet or a good book for the water quality management course?

ACGAN can generate the corresponding target image according to the tag, and its discriminator acts as the tag identification and authenticity judgment in this process. Can a good ACGAN discriminator directly perform multi-classification tasks based on test data sets?If it can't, is there a discriminator in others kind of GAN that can do it? Or need it to add a secondary classifier?

too many lists of journals stating that they are predatory exist but i have no idea how the lists are compiled

Dear Fellow Researchers,

I am researching on authentic leadership style and require a self-reported questionnaire to measure it. Can you please suggest the questionnaire? I will be obliged if you share it with me.

Regards,

Vikas.

We wish to carryout some simulation with authentic radar and camera data. Can any one suggest some open source data bases

I want to distinguish authentic rice from fraudulent rice.

After AD Scientific index, I see many posts on social networks where researchers and universities are flaunting their ranking as per Stanford classification at:

I do not believe that the classification is sponsored by Stanford University in any way, but the person who calculates the classification (J. Ioannidis) works at Stanford University and has published the results of his calculations for the classification in a scientific journal annually for the past three years. The abstract on the ranking site never refers to Stanford University. The list contains the top 2% (195605) cited researchers.

Like the AD Scientific index, I believe it is a good effort and informative but not something reliable where a lot of scrutinizing is needed to authenticate it. So, I will take it with a grain of salt!

I am currently involved in the learning lab at a Cat 1 football club in the UK. What research and insight would be useful for constraints based coaching practice? How do we design authentic research that takes account of the reality of coaching practice but that is also theoretically underpinned?