Artificial - Science topic

discuss

I propose a discussion on my text "Notes on Amartya Sen’s interpretation of cultural identity". The text has been published in Progetto Montecristo – Editoriale Delfino, 2024 (Part 1, 17th October 2024; Part 2, 13th October 2024; Part 3, 5th November 2024). My version of the text is available at the bottom of this announcement as an attachment. The printed text can be read at the following web addresses: https://progettomontecristo.editorialedelfino.it/notes-on-amartya-sens-interpretation-of-cultural-identity-part-1/?fbclid=IwY2xjawF-LO5leHRuA2FlbQIxMQABHcksJSIA5mmlR36zzHgGEDR7CF3t3zBmlVl7hcfm4DSXQKZN0fK_Z6Ck7A_aem_UUlZA9crjYqCO-rI22wBBA https://progettomontecristo.editorialedelfino.it/notes-on-amartya-sens-interpretation-of-cultural-identity-part-2/?fbclid=IwY2xjawGF_i1leHRuA2FlbQIxMQABHRV3C-JbUiuvxiKFWvr0HAjR1y4g5zQFFR4Y8eRS4UZ2W-3HF0ooC7WLcA_aem_BNrERzoP9mu6XDskwUz63A https://progettomontecristo.editorialedelfino.it/notes-on-amartya-sens-interpretation-of-cultural-identity-part-3/?fbclid=IwY2xjawGWrLFleHRuA2FlbQIxMAABHbXCqP7QOzBkC1mXRe1du63cQqqI1C54Miq4yKUonC_S4Znq6ilgK-0z8w_aem_JBI6HiMQHbA6_Zci1IM0rw In our study, we analyse aspects of Sen’s criticism of specific interpretations of cultural identity. We shall see that, in Sen’s view, different interpretations of cultural identity can be given. The different ways in which the concept of cultural identity is interpreted correspond to different ways of living one’s culture; they are connected to different interpretations of religion and religious identity too. Throughout Sen’s inquiry, we shall find the following interpretations of cultural identity: - The first interpretation of cultural identity, which corresponds to Sen’s interpretation of cultural identity, considers cultural identities as the results of a plurality of components which constantly evolve (this might be defined as the flexible, dynamic, and inclusive view of identity). - The second interpretation considers identity as rigid, complete, isolated, and given once and for all (this could be defined as the rigid and static conception of identity). The second conception of identity corresponds to the aim of producing people and groups as isolated systems. Sen investigates the psychological mechanisms connected to the rigid interpretation of cultural identity. Individuals can be manipulated through the rigid interpretation of identity. Sen shows that the rigid interpretation of cultural identities can be used to marginalise all those who do not belong to those same cultural identities. This interpretation of the cultural identity aims to divide individuals, groups, peoples, and nations from each other. Cultural identities can be used to create a group which, as such, does not exist at all or is not so homogeneous and uniform as those who support this concept of identity aim to let appear. The group is created artificially by an artificial cultural identity. The rigid cultural identity of some groups means the exclusion of other groups. This kind of cultural identity serves to bring about enmity between individuals, groups, nations, countries, and communities: it is thought out to produce hostility from a group towards other groups. In Sen’s view, cultural identities always result from a plurality of cultural components. Cultural identities take elements from other cultural identities. Therefore, cultural identities are not isolated systems: they are the product of a historical development which involves the participation of different individuals, groups, and cultures. Moreover, cultural identities are not made once and for all: on the contrary, cultural identities are dynamic phenomena which continuously take in new elements. For our investigation, we shall refer to Amartya Sen’s study "Identity and Violence. The Illusion of Destiny".

Hi folks,

I need to make clusters of small peptides (7-8 amino acid residues).

Ideally, these clusters would group peptides that share residues with similar physical-chemical properties, but of course, identical residues as well. I have groups of about 300 peptides to evaluate, and I don't expect them to be in a single artificial cluster, such as those made by ClustalW. Would you suggest some online tool to do that? Suggestions are very welcome! Many thanks!

I asked this question a year ago but as this industry is moving very fast I would like to know if there are any tools available today that can be highly effective in detecting content generated by artificial intelligence, since the ones used do not distinguish between human and artificial writing. I am attentive to your answers.

Can artificial polyploid plant have less flavonoid content than diploid, though phenolic content is more in polyploid than diploid? Does it affect the biological activities of the plant extract obtained from the polyploid plant? Is there any modification that we need to include in the protocol?

For river reservoir sediments, how can they be processed and improved into Technosols using existing biomass such as straw?Turning river reservoir sediments into plant-friendly artificial soils.

MOST human actions are subconscious. The more close-ended the task, the easier to automate. Perhaps SOME subconscious human acts are more close-ended, therefore easier to automate.

1)

2)

3)

Is it feasible to employ an artificial sun in the experimental investigation of concentrated solar energy systems, specifically linear Fresnel systems? If the answer is affirmative, what type of artificial sun simulates the spectral distribution and irradiance of natural sunlight for accurate and reliable experimentation?

Its very interesting topic, when the AI can be implemented in personal counselling.

Volcanic ash can be used to grow crops without irigation in Lanzarote. Is there a way of artificially replicating these properties to help areas adapt to climate change where volcanoes are not present locally to provide a natural resource?

Is it possible to make the fault resistant and prevent it from breaking?

There are different ways to prevent the vibration of faults. According to most geologists, the thing that causes the fault to rupture and the strong value of the fault and the energy to leave the earthquake center from the fault and the L or Law waves from the Earth's cycle is the pressure over the fault over millions of years. And most importantly, the infiltration of water, moisture, and cold into the faults occurs mostly in the cold season of the year, such as autumn, winter, and spring, as well as in the early morning and at night. and cause the energy inside them to be released, and check this over the time series of earthquakes over several years, we understand the cause of cold and water penetration into the faults, especially at night and early in the morning when the weather gets colder, this rupture There are more faults in the early morning and most of the earthquakes happen in the early morning and from 4 am to 6 am or from 9 pm to 2 am. Easier to underground and faults. And now geologists have realized that humans themselves can create earthquakes, that is, artificial earthquakes through 3 or 4 methods. For example, in the faults and in the parts where there are displacements and displacements in the folded layers of the earth, by digging Amin wells and injecting water pressure into these wells, they penetrate into the layers inside the faults and cause the release of earth's energy and rupture. A fault was created and the center of the artificial earthquake was created, so that it did not shake too much and stopped it from constantly shaking. By filling it with reinforced concrete, it becomes like nails in the ground, which can prevent the faults from breaking, because it is also mentioned in the Holy Qur'an. that mountains are like nails in the earth because mountains prevent the earth from shaking and we humans can create artificial nails in the earth and prevent faults from forming and it is not only nature that has nails like mountains, humans themselves Costs can cause a fault with these nails and tighten them and prevent them from constantly shaking. Of course, this experiment was done by geologists in the Texas region of the United States in 1946 in the Texas region of the United States, when the oil well was at a low depth and they had to dig a well next to the oil well to inject water or a solution of water and salt. cause the well oil to rise; after a while they saw; An earthquake occurred in the Texas region of America for a week, and then geologists realized that the injection of salt and water solution in the anticline region of the region, where there was also a fault, caused the rupture of the faults and caused an artificial earthquake in the region and the release of energy, and this earthquake It shows that humans can also cause earthquakes. Of course, earthquakes can be caused by other methods, one is like exploding a bomb on a fault. Like the bomb explosion in Mallard Karaj area in Alborz province in 1377 at 2 o'clock in the afternoon of Tahar, 5 provinces that were on the Mesha fault shook and everyone felt it because with the explosion of this bomb which was for testing in the military area, it suddenly exploded and took responsibility They were killed and injured, but because it was on the Mesha fault, and this fault starts about 400 kilometers from Abik Qazvin and continues to the north of Semnan, it caused the fault to vibrate and release energy, and maybe there are other ways of fault rupture, for example, using There are many dams in the area of ​​faults and folds of the earth where there are dips and anticlines. Because the dams intensify the infiltration of water into the earth. Of course, other methods have also been proposed, such as using waste and sewage, which causes more environmental destruction, because burying waste and sewage at fault sites, even though it has water, leads to more environmental destruction on the ground. Therefore, the fault can be broken and strong concrete and cement can be created in it and sewn. But all this is a theory, no country has done this yet and it is only a theory.

I am leaning towards a different construction of personality than that in psychology and psychiatry, believing both are top down and dependent on artificial notions. I have recently read East of Eden by Steinbeck and Sanctuary by William Faulkner and the description of psychopathology in both, a description not evident before although itemised. It goes without saying that this is complex but there is far more proof for this idea than genuine evidence for psychiatry.

How to make buildings resistant to earthquakes?

Now in Iran, according to my suggestion, Unilit roof is used in the roofs of residential and office buildings, which is very light. I took this suggestion in an article for the seismological organization in Tehran and gave 14 suggestions to prevent the Tehran earthquake, including 2 They implemented it. One of them removed the bricks from the roof of residential and office buildings and put unilite and poured concrete on top of it, which is very resistant because there is a round rod inside the bits and it was mixed with concrete, and I also said that in metal buildings from 7 or 8 should be used next to the walls because it makes the Masguni houses stronger and also 2 parking spaces should be used under the buildings, like palm trees or dates, which have deep roots and will not fall during an earthquake. Buildings must have deep roots and also in the science of retrofitting structures, divergence is used, that is, natural or artificial rubber is used under the pillars of the houses, and steel springs are used in the middle, so that during an earthquake, the building, like a car or A car that has a spring and the springs play, the building goes up and down but does not fall, and this is a building engineering science that makes buildings resistant to earthquakes and natural disasters. And secondly, through the injection of water and salt solution, the energy of the faults can be removed. Because it comes from the earth's core, which has 6000 degrees Celsius of heat. At any moment, this heat transfers to the surface of the earth. Therefore, the energy inside the earth must be removed, and by transferring the water and salt solution that all the oil extraction companies have, which is known as the injection of water and salt solution, like a tiny needle that is inserted into a balloon so that the balloon does not burst, we humans can create an artificial earthquake. Let's prevent the earthquake explosion and create an artificial earthquake ourselves and release the pressure inside the earth. And 3, we should not build residential or office buildings where there is a fault line, because the buildings are heavy and the taller and bigger they are, the more pressure is placed on the faults. So either we have to build a single floor or not at all to prevent an earthquake from happening.

How to make buildings resistant to earthquakes?

Hi,

I am trying to complete a buckling analysis on a tube with an external pressure. This solves itself easily by adding radial constraint on the internal edge of the tube, one axial constraint at one node and one tangential constraint on one node on each end. See pictures.

However, the radial constraint creates a artificial stiffness. Ideally, it shall represent a O-ring with some stiffness. My question is how I can easily do this. Is it possible to use radial spring elements, if so, how? Could not find anything in the manual about it.

Sincerely

David

I just found many protocols but not specific for bacterial growth

Importantly the features and the parameters to be considered

Trying to know the plight of AI in academic writing

Hello,

I would like to know if someone could advice me about the best device to use to measure artificial light at night in coastal areas, outside and inside water (just few meters)?

Thank you very much,

Best regards,

Nathalie

Are the intelligent and learning humanoid robot "Artificial Friends" , AFs, envisaged by Kazuo Ishiguro in his recent novel "Klara and the Sun" feasible and likely to be mass produced in reality?

If so, wnat are the implications for human society?

IMPORTANT: the entife novel is the life story of KLARA, an artificial friend ie an AF, as told FROM HER INNER PERSPECTIVE, that is it tells her inner thoughts whether outwardly expressed or not.

"Klara and the Sun", Published Faber and Faber 2021

Artificial intelegince

mean how to reduce lateral vibration during earthquake or wind load using AI

Artificial intelegince

Could artificial run own simulation by assuming initial condition as per convenient way

My object is to create a shapefile to distinguish between geological features and artificial features.

how to fill in blur and gaps in Landsat 7 images. What can I do if the Landsat images are blurred in my work to calculate the area of lakes?

the second question is whether it is better to use level-1 Landsat 7 image or level-2 when calculating the surface of lakes?

The four Nobel Awarded cases are suggested for this discussion. Please add your voice and opinion on the following considerations or possible new ones:

Einstein’s theories of relativity and its derivatives are being “proved” for more than hundred years, involving enormous cost of intellectual, technological, natural and financial resources of humanity, artificially involving hundreds of scientists around the world as a career-building enterprise, seeking consensus. All profound scientific theories of the past history, including classical mechanics, thermodynamics, Maxwell’s electromagnetism, Darwin’s theory of evolution, even atomic theory, never needed any “proof”; as those arose from practical activities or accidental discoveries and are being proved millions of times a day through the social/historical practice and technologies of men.

The question is, why so many and never-ending “proofs” (more are in the offing) are necessary for one axiomatic and mainly mathematically derived theory? It seems that these “proofs” are subjectively motivated and most probably contrived; and arises from lingering doubt about the scientific merit of this theory; which is used as the marvel of official science and as the ruling idea of modern society, bolstering theology. The “Big Bang” theory itself, the most important derivative of Einstein’s General Relativity (GR) was adopted in a conference at the Vatican, which excluded the most prominent astrophysicists and the astronomers of the time, as the following quote from Geoffrey Burbidge would testify: “By 1982, when a conference on cosmology was held at the Vatican, a new approach was taken. The radicals around, such as F. Hoyle, V. Ambartsuminan and this speaker (to mention a few) were not even invited. The conference was confined completely to Big Bang cosmology and its proponents. In fact in the introduction to the published volume of the proceedings of the meeting (Pontifical Academy of Sciences, 1982) it was emphasized that only believers (in the Big Bang) were present; and that there was clearly a deliberate decision of the organizers”: G Burbidge, In “The Universe at Large: Key Issues in Astronomy and Cosmology.

1. Black Hole: 2020 Nobel Prize in Physics Awarded to 3 Scientists for Work on Black Holes. The prize was awarded half to Roger Penrose for showing how black holes could form and half to Reinhard Genzel and Andrea Ghez for discovering a supermassive object at the Milky Way's center.

Albert Einstein in published article dismissed the possibility of “Black Hole” formation even in theory: "The essential result of this investigation is a clear understanding as to why the "Schwarzschild singularities" do not exist in physical reality. Although the theory given here treats only clusters whose particles move along circular paths it does not seem to be subject to reasonable doubt that more general cases will have analogous results. The "Schwarzschild singularity" does not appear for the reason that matter cannot be concentrated arbitrarily. And this is due to the fact that otherwise the constituting particles would reach the velocity of light.

This investigation arose out of discussions the author conducted with Professor H. P. Robertson and with Drs. V. Bargmann and P. Bergmann on the mathematical and physical significance of the Schwarzschild singularity. The problem quite naturally leads to the question, answered by this paper in the negative, as to whether physical models are capable of exhibiting such a singularity." Albert Einstein. A. Einstein, The Annals of Mathematics, Second Series, Vol. 40, No. 4 (Oct., 1939), pp. 922-936

2. Gravitational Waves: The 2017 Nobel Foundation awarded half of the million-dollar prize to Weiss, and the other half to Barish and Thorne, “for decisive contributions to the LIGO detector and the observation of gravitational waves.”

The intended aim of this “discovery” of the Gravitational Waves (GWs) was to commemorate the 100th anniversary of Einstein’s theory of General Relativity (GR). In a 1936 manuscript (“Do gravitational waves exist?”) submitted to the Physical Review, Albert Einstein and Nathan Rosen famously claimed that gravitational waves do not exist. That paper was rejected for publication, but Einstein did not change his mind on the possibility of GWs until his death in 1955. Einstein in a letter to his friend Max Born, wrote: “Together with a young collaborator, I arrived at the interesting result that gravitational waves do not exist, though they had been assumed a certainty to the first approximation.” https://www.discovermagazine.com/the-sciences/even-einstein-doubted-his-own-gravitational-waves

Arthur Eddington, who promoted Einstein’s GR from the start, had already dismissed the reality of GWs in 1922 as: “the only speed of propagation relevant to them is “the speed of thought”; in a lengthy publication in: “The Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character. “The Propagation of Gravitational Waves”, By A.S. Eddington, F.R.S. (Received October 11, 1922)

“The problem of the propagation of disturbance of the gravitational field was investigated by Einstein in 1916 and again in 1918*. It has usually been inferred from his discussion that a change in the distribution of matter produces gravitational effects which are propagated with the speed of light; but I think that Einstein really left the question of the speed of propagation rather indefinite. His analysis shows how the co-ordinates must be chosen if it is desired to represent the gravitational potentials as propagated with the speed of light; but there is nothing to indicate that the speed of light appears in the problem, except as the result of this arbitrary choice.

3. Accelerated Expansion of the universe: The 2011 Nobel Prize in physics was awarded today to Saul Perlmutter at the Lawrence Berkeley National Lab, Brian Schmidt at the Australian National Lab and Adam Reiss at Johns Hopkins University for their discovery of the accelerating expansion of the universe.

“Expanding or accelerated expansion” of the universe is assumed on the basis of faulty and contrived assignments of redshift of the galaxies and the so-called Hubble’s Law; which was contested by the two greatest astronomer/astrophysicists of 20thcentury, namely Halton C. Arp and Hubble himself as the following quote would show: "… if redshift are not primarily due to velocity shift … there is no evidence of expansion, no trace of curvature … and we find ourselves in the presence of one of the principles of nature that is still unknown to us today … whereas, if redshifts are velocity shifts which measure the rate of expansion, the expanding models are definitely inconsistent with the observations that have been made … expanding models are a forced interpretation of the observational results." ("Effects of Red Shifts on the Distribution of Nebulae" by E. Hubble, Ap. J., 84, 517, 1936)

A recent publication in the journal Nature contested this Nobel Awarded claim:

J. T. Nielsen, A. Guffanti & S. Sarkar , https://www.nature.com/articles/srep35596

4. Big Bang Creation: The 2006 Nobel prize for physics was awarded to John Mather and George Smoot for their contribution to the big bang theory of the origin of the universe. The pair were honoured for “their discovery of the blackbody form and anisotropy of the cosmic microwave background radiation”, the jury said. George Smoot ascribed the Cosmic Microweb Background Radiation (CMBR) as the “Face of God”, who is believed to have created the universe through a “Big Bang”, proposed by the Belgian priest Georges Lemaître. Per Carlson, the Chairman of Nobel Physics Committee said, according to press reports that “they have not proven the Big Bang theory, but they give it very strong support”.

A rebuttal of this claim by Mather and Smoot have been published: “Ambartsumian, Arp and the

Breeding Galaxies”: http://redshift.vif.com/JournalFiles/V12NO2PDF/V12N2MAL.pdf

Astronomer and astrophysicist Halton Arp, one of the most famous opponents of the Big Bang theory had this to say in a personal communication in reference to this Nobel Award, “The intergalactic medium has to have some temperature. Eddington calculated about 2.7 deg. in 1926. In the 1940’s Max Born calculated 2.7 deg. on the basis of tired light. Gamow calculated 50 deg. before Pezias and Wilson measured 2.73 deg. But a Canadian astronomer, McKellar had already measured it from the excitation of the inter-stellar CN molecule. The ultimate irony is that it is a primary reference frame which violates Einstein’s assumption about no preferred reference frames.”

Now, after many years, the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) is raising big question about the “Big Bang” theory: ‘If we can truly believe what we are seeing, is it time to reappraise our understanding of the dawn of time? “We're peering into the unknown”, Mason says’: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/jwsts-first-glimpses-of-early-galaxies-could-break-cosmology/

..

..

At present, all the dominant and most recognizable brands of technology companies and those developing online information services either already offer their intelligent chatbots online or are working on such solutions and will soon make them available online. Based on advanced generative language models, technologies for intelligent chatbots that are taught specific "human skills" through the use of deep learning and artificial neural networks are constantly being improved. Leading technology companies are also competing to build advanced systems of general artificial intelligence, which will soon far surpass the capabilities of human intelligence, far surpass the processing capabilities that take place in the human central nervous system, in human neurons, the human brain. Some scientific institutes conducting research in the development of robotics, including androids equipped with generative artificial intelligence are striving to build autonomous, intelligent androids, which people will be able to cooperate with humans in various situations, will be able to be employed in companies and enterprises instead of humans, with which it will be possible to have discussions similar to those that humans have among themselves, and which will provide assistance to humans, will perform tasks ordered by humans, will perform difficult work for humans. In the laboratories of such scientific institutes developing this kind of intelligent robotics technology, research work is also being carried out to create artificial emotional intelligence and artificial consciousness. In order for the artificial emotional intelligence and artificial consciousness built in the future not to turn out to be just a dummy and/or simulation of human emotional intelligence and human consciousness it is first necessary to fully understand what human emotional intelligence and human consciousness are and how they work.

In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:

And what is your opinion about it?

What is your opinion on this issue?

Please answer,

I invite everyone to join the discussion,

Thank you very much,

Best wishes,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

Current industry practice of using High pressure High temperature to artificially enhance the Durability and in some cases Color of the Natural or Synthetic Diamonds for Industrial and Fashion purposes, but the results are not economically satisfactory.

Looking for collaboration with Material Scientist or relevant experienced individual to create research on the same for Greater good.

Thank you in advance

Saggar

Need to know the best recipe for silkworm rearing when mulberry leaves are unavailable.

I have the conception which allows the development of artificial universal rational autonomous subjects (AURAS) and looking for partners in the development.

Preferred partner should have a team proficient in the development of humanoids.

With my participation we are will be able to develop an artificial autonomous subject in 3 years.

artificiallabor@artificiallabor.co

WhatsApp number is +1 917 816-4477

Michael Zeldich

My question concerns using low-quality ghee products manufactured and used in Pakistan. Is there any evidence or research available that could point towards severe health conditions, especially increasing heart disease, in our country?

A few other follow-up questions might be:

how is it the Chinese are using the terra Nellus in its action of building the artificial island in South China Sea. is it abide with the unclos?

With artificial progress, is there any need for designers and architects anymore? In your opinion, in which parts can artificial intelligence be replaced and in which part designers and architects?

Will creativity still remain in architecture despite artificial intelligence?

If there is a book about these topics, please write.

I want to know the form of energy with the smallest energy density that can exist independently. Independent existence here means that there is no need to depend on other forms of energy like mechanical energy, internal energy, etc. In this form of energy, when the energy is propagated, it is artificially intercepted and displayed as some independent energy.

I have written, elsewhere, that “…through subjectification, [a] ToM assumes a rationality of action that may be irrationally violated by an ‘Other’. We are shaken when an absurd action is taken by an ‘Other’ that appears to us as irrational, or wrong, or immoral, or illegal; we question mental states we have ascribed to that ‘Other’, and whether they are an ‘other’ at all. Thus …the axiomatic variability of an individual’s mental state ensures there can be no level of universal access to reality…” Allowing AI to (imaginatively) attribute mental states as part of its outputs raises ethical concerns we perhaps have not yet begun to grasp. Is the real problem here that, perhaps ironically, generative AI is more human-like in its processing (flaws and all) than we might have anticipated.

Interested in other perspectives...

..

Can anyone share the protocol for preparing synthetic urine?

The development of artificial intelligence, like any new technology, is associated with various applications of this technology in companies, enterprises operating in various sectors of the economy, and financial and public institutions. These applications generate an increase in the efficiency of the implementation of various processes, including an increase in human productivity. On the other hand, artificial intelligence technologies are also finding negative applications that generate certain risks such as the rise of disinformation in online social media. The increasing number of applications based on artificial intelligence technology available on the Internet are also being used as technical teaching aids in the education process implemented in schools and universities. On the other hand, these applications are also used by pupils and students, who use these tools as a means of facilitating homework, the development of credit papers, the completion of project work, various studies, and so on. Thus, on the one hand, the positive aspects of the applications of artificial intelligence technologies in education are recognized as well. However, on the other hand, serious risks are also recognized for students, for people who, increasingly using various applications based on artificial intelligence, including generative artificial intelligence in facilitating the completion of certain various works, may cause a reduction in the scope of students' use of critical thinking. The potential dangers of depriving students of development and critical thinking are considered. The development of artificial intelligence technology is currently progressing rapidly. Various applications based on constantly improved generative artificial intelligence subjected to learning processes are being developed, machine learning solutions are being created, artificial intelligence is being subjected to processes of teaching the implementation of various activities that have been previously performed by humans. In deep learning processes, generative artificial intelligence equipped with artificial neural networks is taught to carry out complex, multifaceted processes and activities on the basis of large data sets collected in database systems and processed using Big Data Analytics technology. Since the processing of large data sets is carried out by current information systems equipped with computers of high computing power and with artificial intelligence technologies many times faster and more efficiently than the human mind, so already some research centers conducting research in this field are working on an attempt to create a highly advanced generative artificial intelligence, which will realize a kind of artificial thought processes, however, much faster and more efficiently than it happens in the human brain. However, even if someday artificial consciousness technology could be created that would imitate the functioning of human consciousness, humans should not be deprived of critical thinking. Above all, students in schools should not be deprived of artificial thinking in view of the growing scale of applications based on artificial intelligence in education. The aim should be that the artificial intelligence-based applications available on the Internet used in the education process should support the education process without depriving students of critical thinking. However, the question arises, how should this be done?

In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:

What do you think about this topic?

What is your opinion on this issue?

Please answer,

I invite everyone to join the discussion,

Thank you very much,

Warm regards,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

I want someone to help me develop an artificial neural network ANN. if you have any idea on how to develop such, please send me an email, at woadu@csir.brri.org

I now that alot of artificial networks has appeared now. And may be soon we wil not read articles and do our scientific works and AI will help us. May be it is happening now? Wat is your experience working with AI and neural networks in science?

I design two component.

1. A 18 GHz patch antenna which feed by coaxial cable feeding.

2. 18 GHz AMC, which phase 0 at 18GHz.

I want to embed AMC between patch antenna and ground for enhancing the gain.But when i embeded it, the resonant frequency went to 16GHz. So i modified the patch antenna length for adjusting the frequency from 16 to 18 GHz. No matter what i adjust, the frequency still at 16 GHz.

Do anyone know what happen?

I need help!

Thank you

Have a nice day

For the little I understand of lorentz force is that when high current pass through wires, they tend to electromagnetically attract each other.

So I was wondering if, by passing high current, low voltage (like the "reverse" of electrostatic) one would be able to make an electromagnetic artificial muscle.

I came across this video these 3 videos that shows the effect in different manners:

Would be possible to build a coiled artificial muscle made out of high current passing through copper wire (water cooled to avoid damage) that could both use the lorentz force and the electromagnetic field created by the coil in order to make a contraction similar to a muscle?

Is it okay to get TA values in the range of 3000-4000 micromole per liter

Has it occurred to any of you AI/AGI people, that if my writings are of a science of truly empirical psychology , even if just an outline with just clear or clear-types needed for such ... !!!!!

... If you make that input central whenever it is (would be) relevant, that would be good material for a Generalized Artificial machine.

Also see my Answer (to this same Question) below for more stimulation of insight ! (Click the Question's title to see it and my answer. )

The theoretical basis for the concept of the essence of artificial intelligence has been developing since the 1960s. Since then, black scenarios of futurological visions, in which autonomous robots equipped with artificial intelligence will be able to reproduce themselves, self-improve, become independent of human control and become a threat to humans, have been created in literature and film of the genre of scence fiction. Nowadays, in the situation of dynamic development of artificial intelligence and robotics technologies, the above-mentioned considerations return to topicality.

In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:

And what is your opinion about it?

What is your opinion on this topic?

Please answer,

I invite everyone to join the discussion,

Thank you very much,

Best regards,

Dariusz Prokopowicz

looking for a method for detection the artificial coloring agent in honey sample?

like E133, E102, E120 ....

Role of AI

Importance

Structure

Hello good time

Does anyone know what collection of live engineered insects exist in the world?

Dear colleagues ,

As part of the submission of my scientific article to the journal 'Plant Science', I am on a search for a potential reviewer of my work.

To this end, I am pleased to invite you to give me, as soon as possible if it is possible of course, an opinion on my research work entitled "Model for prediction of the flowering stage in the common walnut Juglans regia L., with a view to intervention with artificial pollination".

Please find attached the abstract and keywords of the article. I wish you a happy reading.

Note : Your opinion is very important to me, it helps me to give more value to the work, because it will be added in the submission of the article.

Sincerely,

Recently, Artificial Intelligence (AI) has transformed healthcare, including hemodialysis care. Do you believe that the future of hemodialysis treatment lies in artificial intelligence-driven technologies, which have the potential to significantly enhance patient outcomes and quality of life?

If yes, How and why?

The goal of this project is to develop a better understanding of how AI and humans can effectively communicate with each other, and to develop tools and frameworks that can enhance this communication. By using taxonomic structures to classify the actions of questions that arise during interactions with AI, we can create a more comprehensive understanding of how these systems work and how they can be improved. This research has practical applications in a wide range of fields, including natural language processing, machine learning, and human-computer interaction.

Continuation of discussion of 2018 -see attached archive file:

(27) Agroglyphes - are they natural or of artificial origin_.pdf

Do flowers exhibit sound of any frequency? Lightning has a sound which we can't create artificially. We can create current which is inaudible. What should or can be done to make the violet colour audible?

The force is equal to minus gradient of the potential, therefore, minus gradient of the potential is equal to the acceleration.

Keywords: mobile robot, path planning, artificial potential fields method

Illustrate please

If it is, it could be used to glue broken bones or it could be used to replace some of the surgeries like SI joint fusion.

What does "subjectivity" mean in terms of the human mind and the artificial mind?

Can the components of "subjectivity" be distinguished?

Is it possible to create an artificial Mind without achieving the phenomenon of "subjectivity"?

"Ignorance" and "religion" are integral parts of "subjectivity"?

What should be the model for "subjectivity"?

AGI is possible without the phenomenon of "subjectivity"?

And what exactly are artificial intelligence (AI) and artificial stupidity (AS)?

How do they differ from natural ones?

What are the differences between a set of artificial neurons of an ANNs being correlated with a certain feature and a human person's creating a concept, neural pattern of which is correlated with the use of this concept? Do you think that they are functionally equvalent or similar enough to support the idea that AGI is possible with the current algorithms?

There is a big difference between natural intelligence and artificial intelligence. Natural intelligence is something we are born with and is based on our genetic makeup. Artificial intelligence is something that is created by humans and is based on algorithms and software.

source:

1) What Is The Difference Between Artificial And Natural Intelligence – Surfactants

2) The Third Millennium AI-Driven Humanoid Robots-SwissCognitive

I am looking for the growth rate of the various parts of the strangler fig under best conditions including artificial irrigation with nutrient solution and a spot without shade. Location is GOA

Support and guidance is required in probability elicitation of the child nodes in expert driven bayesian network using GeNIe software.

So... I need to clarify: I’m not an engineer or a university student.

I was trying to read a myriad of different papers in an attempt of finding a way of calculating how much force, pressure and dimensions I should make McKibben Artificial muscles.

But as you can guess, my level of expertise didn’t help and I couldn’t really grasp the equations and evaluations needed to make conceptualise the artificial muscles

I intend to make a 5 ton hydraulic McKibben muscle, but I don’t know the dimensions I should make it. I do not have the materials, so I was trying to find a simplified way of guessing the general numbers (dimensions, pressure, force) required for it.

I tried using the basic “triangle equation” for Force, Pressure or Area. "F = P x A" or "A = F ÷ P", but this formula is meant to be used for solid hydraulic cylinders, not artificial muscles.

But I tried to calculate the surface area of a solid cylinder with the same dimensions of the muscle. With 30 cm of length, 5 cm of radius, which would have a surface area of 170.3 in² (1099cm²).

F = P x A

And the result was 10200 pounds (4626,6422 kg).

However, this equation is meant to be for the surface of a hydraulic piston, but the surface input was the entire membrane. So I’m assuming that is the force applied to the membrane, how much of that force would be translated into linear action?

Hi all,

I am a practioner in LCA, and I am thinking how methodologies from data science, as for example data mining, machine learning, and artificial inteligence can be used in uncertainty analysis.

One possibility involves the development of simplified LCA models, based on the data, but that depends on the training datra. Does anyone have any otherr ideas?

Regards,

António Martins