Science topics: Art
Science topic
Art - Science topic
Art is a diverse range of human activities, including painting, sculpture, printmaking, photography, music, theatre, film, dance, and many more.
Questions related to Art
Almost everything is evolving around patterns:
- Our brain is continuously looking for patterns
- Marketing is about repeating patterns
- Music is about patterns
- Art is about beautiful patterns
- Universe laws are repeating patterns
- Data science is about finding patterns Patterns are here and everywhere, they just need to be discovered.
I'm writing my dissertation on the visual aspeacts of the 80s Memphis Design Movement and I'd love to know any information anyopne has or any opinions on said movement from those who lived thought it.
CREATIVITY AND HUMOR
In his The Act of Creation (1964), Arthur Koestler suggests that there are three types of creativity:
Type I: Artistic Originality:
A work of art is a distortion of reality ranging from dada to realism, as follows:
Dada
Abstract Expressionism
Cubism
Surrealism
Impressionism (Puntilism)
Expressionism
Realism
Camille Saint Saëns’ “Carnival of the Animals”
Ferde Grofé’s “On the Trail” from “Grand Canyon Suite” (Impressionism)
Edvard Munch’s “The Scream” (Expressionism)
Salvador Dali’s art (Surrealism)
Pablo Picasso’s art (Cubism)
Gertrude Stein’s writing (Cubism)
Jackson Pollock’s art (Abstract Expressionism)
Type II: Scientific Discover and Invention:
There are two types of scientific creativity: Discovery, and Invention.
Scientific discovery is epiphanal, and is accompanied by such expressions as
The Bisociative Click!
The Eureka Cry!
The epiphany! or
Das “aha” Erlebniss!
After scientists had discovered the relationships between the moon’s and sun’s gravitation pull, the ocean tides, amber (and static electricity), the lodestones, and the magnet field at the North Pole. They could invent magnets and compasses, AC and DC currents, electro-magnetic engines, etc.
Type III: Comic Inspiration:
But sometimes the bi-association or the incongruity and incongruity resolution, are greater than what is commonly seen in art or in science. This requires a greater suspension of disbelief, because the bi-association is thought to be Incongruous, Incompatible, Ironic, Ludicrous, Paradoxical, Ridiculous, Satiric, or Sardonic.
Examples would include such anachronisms in Science Fiction as the Grandfather’s paradox, where a person goes back in time and kills his own grandfather.
Other examples would be Othello with the hiccups, or a chess player who gives his opponent a double martini.
Fulton’s Folly was still another example of comic inspiration.
When Fulton told the world that he would be able to build a fire that would boil water to make steam to produce the power to make a paddle wheel steam boat paddle upstream, everybody showed up to watch him fail.
They thought that such an attempt was Ludicrous, Ridiculous, or Laughable.
But the audience was wrong. Fulton’s steam boat actually worked. That’s why Arthur Koestler calls this type of creativity “Comic Inspiration.”
CREATIVITY AND HUMOR
In his The Act of Creation (1964), Arthur Koestler suggests that there are three types of creativity:
Type I: Artistic Originality:
A work of art is a distortion of reality ranging from dada to realism, as follows:
Dada
Abstract Expressionism
Cubism
Surrealism
Impressionism (Puntilism)
Expressionism
Realism
Camille Saint Saëns’ “Carnival of the Animals”
Ferde Grofé’s “On the Trail” from “Grand Canyon Suite” (Impressionism)
Edvard Munch’s “The Scream” (Expressionism)
Salvador Dali’s art (Surrealism)
Pablo Picasso’s art (Cubism)
Gertrude Stein’s writing (Cubism)
Jackson Pollock’s art (Abstract Expressionism)
Type II: Scientific Discover and Invention:
There are two types of scientific creativity: Discovery, and Invention.
Scientific discovery is epiphanal, and is accompanied by such expressions as
The Bisociative Click!
The Eureka Cry!
The epiphany! or
Das “aha” Erlebniss!
After scientists had discovered the relationships between the moon’s and sun’s gravitation pull, the ocean tides, amber (and static electricity), the lodestones, and the magnet field at the North Pole. They could invent magnets and compasses, AC and DC currents, electro-magnetic engines, etc.
Type III: Comic Inspiration:
But sometimes the bi-association or the incongruity and incongruity resolution, are greater than what is commonly seen in art or in science. This requires a greater suspension of disbelief, because the bi-association is thought to be Incongruous, Incompatible, Ironic, Ludicrous, Paradoxical, Ridiculous, Satiric, or Sardonic.
Examples would include such anachronisms in Science Fiction as the Grandfather’s paradox, where a person goes back in time and kills his own grandfather.
Other examples would be Othello with the hiccups, or a chess player who gives his opponent a double martini.
Fulton’s Folly was still another example of comic inspiration.
When Fulton told the world that he would be able to build a fire that would boil water to make steam to produce the power to make a paddle wheel steam boat paddle upstream, everybody showed up to watch him fail.
They thought that such an attempt was Ludicrous, Ridiculous, or Laughable.
But the audience was wrong. Fulton’s steam boat actually worked. That’s why Arthur Koestler calls this type of creativity “Comic Inspiration.”
How to create a system of digital, universal tagging of various kinds of works, texts, photos, publications, graphics, videos, etc. made by artificial intelligence and not by humans?
How to create a system of digital, universal labelling of different types of works, texts, texts, photos, publications, graphics, videos, innovations, patents, etc. performed by artificial intelligence and not by humans, i.e. works whose legal, ethical, moral, business, security qualification .... etc. should be different for what is the product of artificial intelligence?
Two days earlier, in an earlier post, I started a discussion on the question of the necessity of improving the security of the development of artificial intelligence technology and asked the following questions: how should the system of institutional control of the development of advanced artificial intelligence models and algorithms be structured, so that this development does not get out of control and lead to negative consequences that are currently difficult to foresee? Should the development of artificial intelligence be subject to control? And if so, who should exercise this control? How should an institutional system for controlling the development of artificial intelligence applications be built? Why are the creators of leading technology companies developing ICT, Internet technologies, Industry 4.0, including those developing artificial intelligence technologies, etc. now calling for the development of this technology to be periodically, deliberately slowed down, so that the development of artificial intelligence technology is fully under control and does not get out of hand? On the other hand, while continuing my reflections on the indispensability of improving the security of the development of artificial intelligence technology, analysing the potential risks of the dynamic and uncontrolled development of this technology, I hereby propose to continue my deliberations on this issue and invite you to participate in a discussion aimed at identifying the key determinants of building an institutional control system for the development of artificial intelligence, including the development of advanced models composed of algorithms similar or more advanced to the ChatGPT 4.0 system developed by the OpenAI company and available on the Internet. It is necessary to normatively regulate a number of issues related to artificial intelligence, both the issue of developing advanced models composed of algorithms that form artificial intelligence systems; posting these technological solutions in open access on the Internet; enabling these systems to carry out the process of self-improvement through automated learning of new content, knowledge, information, abilities, etc.; building an institutional system of control over the development of artificial intelligence technology and current and future applications of this technology in various fields of activity of people, companies, enterprises, institutions, etc. operating in different sectors of the economy. Recently, realistic-looking photos of well-known, highly recognisable people, including politicians, presidents of states in unusual situations, which were created by artificial intelligence, have appeared on the Internet on online social media sites. What has already appeared on the Internet as a kind of 'free creativity' of artificial intelligence, creativity both in terms of the creation of 'fictitious facts' in descriptions of events that never happened, in descriptions created as an answer to a question posed for the ChatGPT system, and in terms of photographs of 'fictitious events', already indicates the potentially enormous scale of disinformation currently developing on the Internet, and this is thanks to the artificial intelligence systems whose products of 'free creativity' find their way onto the Internet. With the help of artificial intelligence, in addition to texts containing descriptions of 'fictitious facts', photographs depicting 'fictitious events', it is also possible to create films depicting 'fictitious events' in cinematic terms. All of these creations of 'free creation' by artificial intelligence can be posted on social media and, in the formula of viral marketing, can spread rapidly on the Internet and can thus be a source of serious disinformation realised potentially on a large scale. Dangerous opportunities have therefore arisen for the use of technology to generate disinformation about, for example, a competitor company, enterprise, institution, organisation or individual. Within the framework of building an institutional control system for the development of artificial intelligence technology, it is necessary to take into account the issue of creating a digital, universal marking system for the various types of works, texts, photos, publications, graphics, films, innovations, patents, etc. performed by artificial intelligence and not by humans, i.e. works whose legal, ethical, moral, business, security qualification ..., should be different for what is the product of artificial intelligence. It is therefore necessary to create a system of digital, universal labelling of the various types of works, texts, photos, publications, graphics, videos, etc., made by artificial intelligence and not by humans. The only issue for discussion is therefore how this should be done.
In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:
How to create a system for the digital, universal marking of different types of works, texts, photos, publications, graphics, videos, innovations, patents, etc. made by artificial intelligence and not by humans, i.e. works whose legal, ethical, moral, business, security qualification .... etc. should be different for what is the product of artificial intelligence?
How to create a system of digital, universal labelling of different types of works, texts, photos, publications, graphics, videos, etc. made by artificial intelligence and not by humans?
What do you think about this topic?
What is your opinion on this subject?
Please respond,
I invite you all to discuss,
Thank you very much,
Best regards,
Dariusz Prokopowicz

Is merely combining art and technology equate creativity?
The idea that artworks (music, painting, performance, sculpture) can be art as generators of solidarity is not new but deserves more investigation. How can artworks be used to generate genuine solidarity? What concepts operate in this phenomenon?
All suggestions are welcome! :-)
How has the courts interpreted the OAU and the African Charter in relation to application of the non-refoulement principle in cases involving terrorists? Is the principle held to be absolute like the ECHR (art 3) or is it not? can anyone help me with these questions
"The word art, science, and engineering are closely related" contains over fifty innovative keys. Moreover, every creative key adds new information and knowledge to art, science, and engineering words.
What is the unified and stable art of any word?
To learn this, we must find definitive answers to the following questions.
Please answer the following questions:
What is the art of the word? And this is.
It raises other questions, and one of them resulted in a new science called the art of abstraction by Fayad (FAA):
What is the significance of the word?
What is the value of the word?
What are the advantages and ethics of the word?
What are the aesthetic qualities of the word?
What is the final and comprehensive definition of any word?
What are the uses of the word technically?
What is the visual art of the word?
What is the beauty of the word?
What is the creativity of the word?
and others
Let us discuss - what is your view on management, is it an art or a science ? What are your arguments for the position you have taken?
What characterizes a novel concept? How do innovative ideas manifest in the domains of science, art, and politics? How do new ideas come about in science and art? In what ways do new ideas in science and art differ from each other?
In a bustling city, Sarah, a young artist, decides to paint a mural on a blank wall in her neighborhood. The mural depicts scenes of unity, diversity, and hope, intending to inspire a sense of community among the residents. At first glance, it may seem like just another artwork in a city full of vibrant street art, but little does Sarah know that her small action is about to set off a ripple effect that will transform the entire neighborhood.
One morning, a curious journalist named Emma stumbles upon the mural during her daily walk. Intrigued by the beauty and message behind the artwork, Emma decides to write an article about it, hoping to shine a light on the positive impact of public art in urban spaces. The article gains traction quickly and is shared widely across social media platforms, attracting the attention of city officials and community leaders.
Impressed by the impact of Sarah's mural, the city council decides to launch an initiative to promote public art throughout the city. They allocate funds for local artists to create more murals and sculptures in various neighborhoods, aiming to beautify the city and foster a sense of pride and unity among its residents.
As the city becomes an open canvas for creativity, a newfound sense of community emerges. People from diverse backgrounds come together to celebrate the artworks, organizing art walks and community events. Businesses in the neighborhood notice an increase in foot traffic, leading to economic growth in the area.
Inspired by the success of the art initiative, local schools integrate art education into their curriculum, nurturing the creativity of young minds. Sarah's mural becomes a symbol of hope and empowerment, motivating the next generation to pursue their dreams and make a positive impact on their communities.
In an unexpected turn of events, Sarah's mural also catches the eye of a prominent art gallery owner. Impressed by her talent and the impact of her work, the gallery owner offers Sarah an opportunity to showcase her art in a solo exhibition. Sarah's career takes off, and her artwork gains international recognition, drawing attention to the importance of public art in transforming communities.
As the years pass, Sarah's mural stands tall as a symbol of the power of small actions. The once overlooked blank wall has become a landmark, attracting tourists and art enthusiasts from all over the world. The ripple effect of her small action has not only transformed her neighborhood but has also ignited a citywide movement celebrating the role of art in creating positive change.
In this narrative, Sarah's decision to paint a mural exemplifies how a single small action can lead to a chain reaction of positive changes, creating a significant impact on the community, city, and even the art world at large. It showcases the potential power that lies within each individual to make a difference, no matter how small their actions may seem.
What is the state of the art in multimodal 3D rigid registration of medical images with Deep Learning?
I have a 3d multimodal medical image dataset and want to do rigid registration.
What is the art of 3d multimodal rigid registration?
Example of the shape of the data:
The fixed image 512*512*197 and the moving images 512*512*497.
You are invited to Join:
Fayad's Art of Abstraction (FAA)
LinkedIn Group
Every field of Knowledge depends on ABSTRACTIONS. Unfortunately, current Abstractors could be doing better on the abstraction process and the type of abstractions because it is based mainly on tangibility and ignores other more essential conceptions.
Fayad's Art of Abstraction (FAA) shows how to abstract over 50 innovative keys per concept (Noun and Noun Phrase) within the natural language dictionary. These Innovative Keys require more than 200 FAA techniques or algorithms, where FAA techniques will be shown per each innovative key and done once per concept, avoiding reinventing the wheels.
The FAA will be used and utilized in both application and system developments. As a unique system, every concept has more than 50 discoveries, including functional requirements, special non-functional requirements, stable and Unified design, contexts, challenges, constraints, applicability, measure-ability, and more.
FAA led to unified, stable discoveries and included unlimited advantages (that will be addressed in many different publications, videos, books, panels, discussion groups, courses, training, and others).
1. Understand and appreciate our natural languages --
2. The future of technology depends on these discoveries.
3. Unification of domain analysis of any field of Knowledge
4. Know how to generate stable and unified requirements and the ultimate design of any system.
5. Knowledge Unification
7. Limit and control maintenance problems
8. Explore and create a massive number of new systems
9. Generate better methodologies for developing unified and stable systems
10. Stop reinventing the wheels
11. Develop and executable self-manageable, self-adaptable, self, extendable, and self-configurable systems with unlimited applicability and reuse.

pls do answer the possibility as per the state of the art current technology
Because it is difficult to define SUSTAINABILITY in scientific sense. I believe it is an art that when practised and fine tuned more will give better results. E.g. Art of singing when practised to perfection will lead to a sustainable singer.
Can paintings painted or sculptures created, unique architectural designs by robots equipped with artificial intelligence be recognised as fully artistic works of art?
In recent years, more and more perfect robots equipped with artificial intelligence have been developed. New generations of artificial intelligence and/or machine learning technologies, when equipped with software that enables the creation of unique works, new creations, creative solutions, etc., can create a kind of artwork in the chosen field of creativity and artistry. If we connect a 3D printer to a robot equipped with an artificial intelligence system that is capable of designing and producing beautiful sculptures, can we thus obtain a kind of work of art?
When a robot equipped with an artificial intelligence system paints beautiful pictures, can the resulting works be considered fully artistic works of art?
If NO, why not?
And if YES, then who is the artist of the works of art created in this way, is it a robot equipped with artificial intelligence that creates them or a human being who created this artificial intelligence and programmed it accordingly?
What is your opinion on this topic?
What do you think about this topic?
Please reply,
I invite you all to discuss,
Thank you very much,
Best regards,
Dariusz Prokopowicz

We used to have some project that discussed these interesting topics. I hope some of you will start this discussion going from your own perspective. How does art connect with science? My husband works in science and I am definitely one of those "mind wanderers" who get so easily distracted because in art we think associatively.
I almost daily have to think why I don't mind how my mind works. What are your thoughts in these two very different styles of cognitive activity?
If a new piece of music is created, but created by an artificial intelligence, how is the question of creativity to be assessed and how will copyright work, what part of the resulting artistic work will be regarded as a manifestation of the creativity of a technologically advanced tool such as certain artificial intelligence solutions, and what part will be regarded as the creativity of a human being who operates, questions, teaches etc. the artificial intelligence so that it performs in a certain way tasks which until recently were regarded as possible only by humans?
In the context of the development and successive but also relatively fast emerging new applications of artificial intelligence technology, reflections on the essence of creativity, which until recently was considered an exclusively human trait, are emerging. However, rapidly emerging new applications of increasingly refined artificial intelligence, which can be taught to process increasingly creative and much more efficient multi-criteria processing of ever larger data sets, is becoming the basis for consideration of creative task solving by specific artificial intelligence solutions, including generative language models, i.e. ChatGPT 4.0. Among the many different fields in which humans develop their capacity for creativity is the arts. Within the framework of artistic activity, humans have been developing several key artistic fields such as painting, sculpture, architecture, literature, theatre, music and singing since ancient times. On the other hand, modern artistic fields such as photography and film are also developing, thanks to the technological revolutions that have taken place over the past two centuries. In recent years, a large proportion of the artworks collected in art galleries, libraries etc. have been digitised and have their digital counterparts, which are made available on the Internet. During the Coronavirus pandemic of 2020, the processes of digitisation of various types of artistic works and other products of human activity and creativity accelerated significantly. New ICT information technologies and Industry 4.0 have become of great help in the processes of digital processing, analysis and use of increasingly large amounts of data, including artistic works. Artificial intelligence technologies currently under development, after the application of specific learning processes, i.e. the application of machine learning and/or deep learning technologies, are capable of combining different types of data, including on different types of digitised media and digitised artistic works, to create something new, which can be considered a kind of new form of creativity. Sometimes, the effects of this kind of creativity realised by artificial intelligence are such a new field of application of this technology that the relevant legal regulations, including but not limited to copyright, have not yet been established. Well, if with the help of artificial intelligence it is possible to create pictures of an event that did not happen, i.e. as if one were to photograph a media-famous person in a situation and place where he or she has never really been, one can create a film with a cast of people who are no longer alive or who did not really exist at all, etc., then where does the creativity of those using artificial intelligence end? where does the creativity of people using artificial intelligence as a tool to achieve a specific goal end and where does the creativity of this technology begin, which, understanding the commands of humans, more and more precisely creates a kind of innovative solutions, more and more efficiently performs specific tasks and more and more creatively creates a kind of artistic works that are difficult to distinguish from their analytical works created traditionally, i.e. without the use of advanced information technology by humans. One particularly interesting thing that has already happened is the creation, with the help of artificial intelligence, of a new musical work of a song, in which the voice of a certain real existing singer is used, combined with new music and new song lyrics, and in this way a recording of a song sung by a singer who in reality never wrote the music and never sang the song is created. And if a song created in this way finds its way to the top of the charts, how will the question of honouring copyright be resolved, who is and to what extent the creator of such a work, to whom should the key part of the creativity in such a creation of a musical work be attributed? But of course, this is only an example, as similar, as yet unregulated complex processes for the creation of artistic works with the involvement of artificial intelligence in this process can and probably will be applied in other fields of art as well. In addition, the question of the creativity of artificial intelligence in the context of human creativity, in which also thought processes, consciousness, emotions, etc. are involved, also remains to be resolved.
In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:
If a new piece of music is created, but created by an artificial intelligence, how is the question of creativity to be assessed and how will copyright work, what part of the resulting artistic work will be considered as a manifestation of the creativity of a technologically advanced tool such as certain artificial intelligence solutions, and what part will be considered as the creativity of a human being who operates, questions, teaches, etc. the artificial intelligence so that it performs in a certain way tasks that until recently were considered to be possible only by a human being?
What do you think about it?
What is your opinion on this subject?
Please respond,
I invite you all to discuss,
Thank you very much,
Best wishes,
Dariusz Prokopowicz

is it really important to understand the technical details or judging without knowledge is fine?
This question seeks to determine how art connects with society. Comments and forwarded studies, art exhibits, plays, music, literature, all have roles to play in this. Please add your thoughts.
Gloria McMillan
It seems that almost all humans tend to judge art easily and confidently. Without any solid and objective reference, how can they decide boldly and confidently about something that is to a great extent not mathematically rateable?
People say easily and confidently "This person has a very good voice", or "That actor nailed it in his latest movie", etc.
How and why?
More detail:
For example, on talent shows, I see judges confidently talk about the high or mediocre quality of a contestant's performance. In many shows, the performance is not even relevant to the profession and expertise of a judge. Yet he confidently talks about the art piece. So it is mostly (if not only) the judge's personal opinion, and can't be something learned by them or objective. They are merely guessing, yet they are so sure about it.
How and why?
In some cases, it is somehow easier to GUESS if an art piece is good or not. This is the case perhaps in paintings or drawings or an overall impression of a movie, as well as when an art piece is exceptionally unique. But in many other situations, it is really not easy or clear at all to say if this is beautiful or mediocre.
So despite the impossibility of purely objective assessments, how can people decide so certainly about esthetics and art?
ps. Perhaps TV judges are somehow pretending to be so confident because they are on a show. But this pattern is not limited to TV shows. Everybody is like this on and off TV.
I am a design student in the Netherlands currently writing my thesis about ''the healing properties of immersive art experiences and installations''.
Emotions and personal insight from the audience are key components that I want to study. Specifically how these other worlds relief stress and are decontextualizing.
However, the immersive art I want to study is quite specific. It is spatial installations, where the whole space is transformed and the viewer finds himself in another world basically- Moew Wolf, Karmanoia (Tilburg), Jardin d’hiver-Jean du Buffet.
Do you know of any studies or assessments to audiences perceptions/ reactions/ feelings that go into such ''experiences''?
Thank you
Different creative outlets, from music therapy to body art are known to promote healing for survivors of domestic violence. This can take a more structured form, such as art therapy, which is when a licensed mental health professional works with clients to “use art media, the creative process, and the resulting artwork to explore their feelings, reconcile emotional conflicts, foster self-awareness, manage behavior and addictions, develop social skills, improve reality orientation, reduce anxiety, and increase self-esteem”. Because it has the flexibility to “be molded and designed around each and every individual patient and issue, addressing not only the physical and mental aspects, but reaching deeper into the emotional and spiritual,” art therapy is particularly helpful for survivors of domestic violence. How art therapy can be “an effective tool for expression, personal growth, and recovery from traumatic events and emotional weight and be used to alleviate the physical and psychological effects of domestic violence? ”
Recently, many of my friends who have enrolled in post graduate studies, whether masters or PhD, have claimed that research is quite restricted to specific standards and formalities and that it lacks art and creativity.
Although I understand the reasons behind their claims, they raise further questions regarding the nature of both research and art.
What is art?
Can research be creative? And in what ways?
Can knowledge be artistic?
Can the research output be a type of artwork, just like when we refer to a painting or a sculpture or whatever?
Do the traditional art forms such as painting and sculpture serve a vital purpose today?
In his The Act of Creation (1964), Arthur Koestler suggests that there are three types of creativity:
Type I: Artistic Originality:
A work of art is a distortion of reality ranging from dada to realism, as follows:
Dada
Abstract Expressionism
Cubism
Surrealism
Impressionism (Puntilism)
Expressionism
Realism
Camille Saint Saëns’ “Carnival of the Animals”
Ferde Grofé’s “On the Trail” from “Grand Canyon Suite” (Impressionism)
Edvard Munch’s “The Scream” (Expressionism)
Salvador Dali’s art (Surrealism)
Pablo Picasso’s art (Cubism)
Gertrude Stein’s writing (Cubism)
Jackson Pollock’s art (Abstract Expressionism)
Type II: Scientific Discover and Invention:
There are two types of scientific creativity: Discovery, and Invention.
Scientific discovery is epiphanal, and is accompanied by such expressions as
The Bisociative Click!
The Eureka Cry!
The epiphany! or
Das “aha” Erlebniss!
After scientists had discovered the relationships between the moon’s and sun’s gravitation pull, the ocean tides, amber (and static electricity), the lodestones, and the magnet field at the North Pole. They could invent magnets and compasses, AC and DC currents, electro-magnetic engines, etc.
Type III: Comic Inspiration:
But sometimes the bi-association or the incongruity and incongruity resolution, are greater than what is commonly seen in art or in science. This requires a greater suspension of disbelief, because the bi-association is thought to be Incongruous, Incompatible, Ironic, Ludicrous, Paradoxical, Ridiculous, Satiric, or Sardonic.
Examples would include such anachronisms in Science Fiction as the Grandfather’s paradox, where a person goes back in time and kills his own grandfather.
Other examples would be Othello with the hiccups, or a chess player who gives his opponent a double martini.
Fulton’s Folly was still another example of comic inspiration.
When Fulton told the world that he would be able to build a fire that would boil water to make steam to produce the power to make a paddle wheel steam boat paddle upstream, everybody showed up to watch him fail.
They thought that such an attempt was Ludicrous, Ridiculous, or Laughable.
But the audience was wrong. Fulton’s steam boat actually worked. That’s why Arthur Koestler calls this type of creativity “Comic Inspiration.”
I'm wondering about the management is business world. Are there some roles can anyone go through them and be successful manager? Or it is an art not only specific people can be managers? Or both?
Following the rising popularity of AI-model generating tools, such as Midjourney, there have been multiple architects who have acquired such techniques in building their professional profile. Meanwhile, the foundational skills of geometric composition are being diluted gradually at the expense of fast-paced accessible technology.
From an academic perspective, it might sound threatening to the profession, as some academics fear the condition of being ignored or left behind. Hence, academic systems are continuously aiming to bridge their infrastructure with that of the global market to ensure their survival.
Will there be a time when the architect will submit to the machine? Is this the revival of Walter Benjamin's essay of cultural criticism, "The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Production", which criticizes mechanical structure during the Nazi regime and its devaluing effect on art?
Would love to hear your thoughts...
Recently, discussions about chatGPT have swept across the globe at an unprecedented pace, and it can be anticipated that this is the beginning of a productivity efficiency revolution. The future is already here, and we need to embrace it with a positive attitude, but how to make good use of chatGPT is a kind of art.
As researchers, how can we use chatGPT to improve our research efficiency? Experts and scholars are welcome to share their techniques or views on using chatGPT.
Many thanks!
bests
In your opinion, is creativity and innovation important in conducting scientific research?
It is a widely held opinion that creativity and innovation is important in various aspects of people's lives, in many different spheres of human activity.
Creativity and innovation is also important in many spheres of professional activities carried out in different sectors of the economy, in different professional positions and professions of work performed. In addition, creativity and innovation is particularly important in the arts, in the creation of works of art within various fields of art. Creativity and innovation is, in its essence, a key factor in the arts. Creativity and innovativeness is also important in business, in the management of business entities, in the establishment of startups, in the creation of new technological solutions, new technologies, product and other innovations, in the creation of inventions, and so on.
In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:
In your opinion, is creativity and innovation also important in conducting scientific research?
What do you think about this topic?
Please answer,
I invite everyone to join the discussion,
Thank you very much,
Best wishes,
Dariusz Prokopowicz

My expertise in Creating Art and object using graph equation in cartesian Space and plane, so please suggest me an article with the kind of my expertise if any.
Thank you
AI - the new Wild West, is challenging thinking about what counts as knowledge, who holds the knowledge, and the myriad ethics involved in claiming art, essays and a host of other areas as one's own. Rather than universities trying to devise ways to catch the thieves, I see this time as opportunity to finally think differently about ways to know what students' know.
How will assessment change and what are the benefits of that change.
Is Nanoart collective or individual art?
Congratulations, Dear Friends.
We are conducting research in which we reflect on the authorship of scientific art, namely, the Nanoart genre. Nanoart is the presentation of microscopic images as a cultural and artistic product. Microscope images are usually black and white. They are often coloured to give the image more aesthetic. In our research, we aim to answer the question: Is Nanoart collective or individual art? Who is the author of such a picture: a nanotechnologist (who created the nanostructure) or an artist (who painted it)? The opinions of experts, participants, and just viewers are important to us.
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSczmLjfYtcaswrn1jUzaG-LtuXC5nCUoISejdQzlB59jw-6dw/viewform?vc=0&c=0&w=1&flr=0
Devote some time on our research. The survey is anonymous and open. We will also appreciate if you will be able to share this survey with your colleagues and friends
Dear Coleagues. I'm in the process of writing a conceptual paper about how luxury brand-artist cooperations change aesthetic routines of stakeholders and what is the output of such changes. Here is one on the topics: limited explanation of the cooperation content promotes ignorancy.
The art-event makers: "the emblemating Kusama's polka dots". Consumers: "Awful", "designer went to kindergarten art class that day ..he came back happily with this bag". This is how the explanations of the art-project makers reduced to the signs provoke ignorant consumer valuations and turn Yayoi Kusama's art into decoration. And then scholars analyze the consumers' valuations as data in their studies. When you know "Narcissus Garden" you understand the diffenece between the sign (the dots) and the problem (anti-Narcisism) in Kusama's art. https://www.facebook.com/LouisVuitton/photos/a.341470190124/10167192333530125 Do you think that Social Practice Theory (E. Shove) is right to use in the conceptual paper about this? Any other methodological ideas? #luxury #brand #artist #art
We are looking for a bioinformatician who can help us with AI based deep docking system or you can provide us a training programm to learn such a art of bioinformatics.
Is Nanoart collective or individual art?
Congratulations, Dear Friends.
We are conducting research in which we reflect on the authorship of scientific art, namely, the Nanoart genre. Nanoart is the presentation of microscopic images as a cultural and artistic product. Microscope images are usually black and white. They are often coloured to give the image more aesthetic. In our research, we aim to answer the question: Is Nanoart collective or individual art? Who is the author of such a picture: a nanotechnologist (who created the nanostructure) or an artist (who painted it)? The opinions of experts, participants, and just viewers are important to us.
Devote some time on our research. The survey is anonymous and open. We will also appreciate if you will be able to share this survey with your colleagues and friends
I am trying to find background information about this poster made in 1918 by Theo Molkenboer. For now, I found out this poster was made during the art movement mentioned in the question.
Does anyone know why feminists picked this art movement for their propaganda?

How do we understand what literature means today having in mind that there are a number of great works (such as Homer's Iliad, or Don Quixote by Miguel de Cervantes, and Shakespeare's Hamlet) which we consider to be prime examples of literary art and the western canon, but, at the same time, that literature's essential properties are not indisputably established and have undergone critical changes throughout human history?
The margin between literary (novels, poems, plays) and non-literary (advertisements, news) texts is fairly well outlined but are there any texts which do not fit either of the two groups, or, to the contrary - which bear some essential characteristics of both groups and hence cannot be so easily categorized?
I work in a liberal art based university. I would like to propose a course about energy storage and conversion technologies. However, it is a challenge to find a textbook that could be used to teach this topic to non-science students.
Each nation has different culture, so their art works are modified according to their culture. What kinds of examples can be given?
It is always said that agriculture is science and art ..for instance, if we place seeds in soil, it wil get hydrolyzed by soaking up of the water so called imbibition, following emergence of redicle and plumule....
But proper placing the seeds isan art and skill exhibited by farmers or workers or drudgery to maintain definite and desired distance between plant to plant in order to get maximum production potential while eliminating the chances of competition among plants...
There is a big difference between the function of Christian art and Islamic art... which caused a difference in the general appearance between them even though they both grew up in almost the same place..


- Word growth
- Publications by year, publisher
- Geographic region
... or whether art and design is of central importance in the nationwide curricula (especially with regard to general competences)?
Do you have any suggestions to improve the storytelling skill in the literature review?
The 2023 ranking is available through the following link:
QS ranking is relatively familiar in scientific circles. It ranks universities based on the following criteria:
1- Academic Reputation
2- Employer Reputation
3- Citations per Faculty
4- Faculty Student Ratio
5- International Students Ratio
6- International Faculty Ratio
7- International Research Network
8- Employment Outcomes
- Are these parameters enough to measure the superiority of a university?
- What other factors should also be taken into account?
Please share your personal experience with these criteria.
I have written a paper addressing the issue of automatic colorization of black and white photographs. The perspective is an ethical one that addresses both pros and cons. Now I am searching for a peer-reviewed paper to publish my essay.
If you have any recommendations, I would be more than happy to see them.
Details about the paper:
Words: 3000
Style: APA 7
I am curious to learn the current state of the art to measuring SES, particularly across countries.
I try to run headers files containing in the nr3 the art of scientific computing with c/c++. Is there some tips ?
How do you research and bring work together?
You may use the technique of consilience without knowing it.
Read this definition and then let me know how you use consilience in your work.
Highlights:
In science and history, consilience (also convergence of evidence or concordance of evidence) is the principle that evidence from independent, unrelated sources can "converge" on strong conclusions. That is, when multiple sources of evidence are in agreement, the conclusion can be very strong even when none of the individual sources of evidence is significantly so on its own. Most established scientific knowledge is supported by a convergence of evidence: if not, the evidence is comparatively weak, and there will not likely be a strong scientific consensus.
The principle is based on the unity of knowledge; measuring the same result by several different methods should lead to the same answer. For example, it should not matter whether one measures distances within the Giza pyramid complex by laser rangefinding, by satellite imaging, or with a meter stick – in all three cases, the answer should be approximately the same. For the same reason, different dating methods in geochronology should concur, a result in chemistry should not contradict a result in geology, etc.
The word consilience was originally coined as the phrase "consilience of inductions" by William Whewell (consilience refers to a "jumping together" of knowledge).[1][2] The word comes from Latin com- "together" and -siliens "jumping" (as in resilience).[3]
Artists often incorporate the humor, parody, paradox, exaggeration (caricature) and irony in their art and architecture. This especially true in the art of Salvador Dali, Marcel Du Champs, M. C. Escher, Pablo Picasso, Jackson Pollack. We also discuss humor in public art, and architecture. Because art is a distortion of reality, we classify art as Abstract Expressionism, Dadaism, Expressionism, Minimalism, Maximalism (e.g. Gothic), Realism, Surrealism etc. Can you give other examples of humor, parody, paradox, (exaggeration (caricature) or irony in art or architecture?
I have a question for the art historians. Is it necessary to have a permission to publish the images of artist's creative works after 58 years of his death in the PhD thesis? It's not a commercial goal, only the research work. Thanks!
Dear all,
I have read the paper “An Assessment of the State of the Art from the 2019 ARO Dynamic Stall Workshop” by Prof. M.J. Smith et al . where she said that the experimental database on 2-D dynamic stall of airfoils NACA0012, VR 7 and VR12 is available online or by request. I would be grateful if someone who has the web address for getting this experimental database, send it to me.
Best regards,
This is a painting of Islamic art dating back to the thirteenth century.. How can we analyze the elements of the painting?

The new deadline is July 31.
Description
Ecological awareness can be traced back to the 1960s with the publication of Rachel Carson’s watershed work, Silent Spring, which drew public attention to the enormous environmental impact of pesticides and other pollutants on delicate ecosystems. Her work anticipated other key eco-political awakenings, such as the energy crisis of the early 1970s and the series of international environmental agreements politically defined at the Rio Earth Summit in 1992, which constituted a significant shift in global awareness and action of ecological crisis. Artists were already on high alert by the early 1990s, responding to the environmental crisis through activist and educational stances. Today, the world is faced with multiple aspects and consequences of the climate crisis, but there has been a change in citizens’ relationships to more than thirty years of overwhelming environmental issues. Works of art, architecture, and design that reside in the public realm and contend with the environmental crisis have begun to occupy a new, discursive terrain as agents of public enlightenment. They adopt an educational stance choosing to address politics, culture, ethics, economics, business, or even provide solutions. These works, which might be called “eco-didactic”, do not simply demonstrate their concern about pressing ecological issues; rather, they are driven by an urgent need to explain, to teach and maybe even implicate viewers and visitors about the crisis as well as the consequences of inaction.
For this special issue of Sustainability, we invite essays that focus on environmentally-driven architecture, landscape design, and public art practices that have emerged over the last two decades (2000-2020). We are interested in practices that manifest a distinctively “didactic” environmental discourse, i.e. one that aims to educate and influence the public. This special issue invites papers that present cases and contribute to the reflection of the following:
- How have art, architecture, and design come together in recent decades to express ecological and environmental concerns?
- How does this “eco-didactic turn” cross disciplines, specifically art, design and architecture?
- By what means do these eco-didactic installations establish public platforms for raising awareness?
- To what extent do these eco-didactic works in the public realm lead to public enlightenment?
- How do such creative practices contribute to the potential of public space as a political forum?
- Can these eco-didactic art, design, and architecture practices influence small businesses, corporations, governments, and policy?
Prof. Dr. Carmela Cucuzzella
Prof. Dr. Jean-Pierre Chupin
Prof. Dr. Cynthia Hammond
Guest Editors
As someone that wants to go into scientific illustration this topic interests me greatly. Does anyone know of artists or engineers that loosely base their craft on protest structures (or any other biological structures)? I've only been able to find Ernst Haekals artwork but no other biomimicry architecture or art.
I recently started a Art/Scince project but the book chapter title is incorrect. How do I edit or delete and start again?
Obviously, an artist is someone who creates art, just a baker is someone who makes bread. These are simply trades and professions; that is, means by which different people make their livings. Unlike baking however, the difficulty lies in defining "art." Art is pretty much whatever anybody says it is, and an artist is similarly anybody who says he is one. This leaves any definition of "artist" and "art" so vague as to be meaningless. In your opinion, who is an Artist?
Yes, colors matter. For example, the red color often means activity and action, the blue color is gentleness and peaceful disposition, while the green color rests our eyes to the greatest degree.
What do you think are given specific colors and / or characteristics to colors? What is the symbolism of each color?
Are the embossed features and symbolism given to colors?
Please reply
I invite you to the discussion
Thank you very much
Best wishes

I think this is about applying various art forms in a constructivist way.
Does the development of online information technologies and the Internet of Things contribute to the popularization of art and culture in society?
More and more museums present their collections of works of art in the form of reproductions published on the Internet. The development of Internet information technologies and the Internet of Things contributes to the popularization of art and culture in society.
Do you agree with me on the above matter?
Please reply
I invite you to the discussion
Thank you very much
Best wishes

In many countries, reading is reportedly declining, we read less and less books, which is reportedly related to the development of information media on the Internet. Perhaps the development of social media also contributes to the declining readability of books.
I have a favor to ask:
Please enter the title of the book on literature you read last time?
Please reply
