Science topics: Higher EducationAcademia
Science topic

Academia - Science topic

Explore the latest questions and answers in Academia, and find Academia experts.
Questions related to Academia
  • asked a question related to Academia
Question
3 answers
Government-sponsored Ph.D. awards that come from the applicant's home country should be discontinued! It breaks my heart to see people receiving this scholarship despite the fact that they are not qualified, however just because they were recommended by their home countries. Unfortunately, after beginning their Ph.D. with the help of this scholarship, they do nothing except spend their stipend on activities other than research. In the end, they are having a Dr. title without any qualification in research. That's quite terrible and is damaging academia on a daily basis. This is also unjust to other candidates who possess the necessary qualifications and the desire to begin a Ph.D. degree. It is time to tighten up the selection process for Ph.D., and candidates should be picked by a committee made up of members of the host nation in a fair and open manner.
#academia #research #phd #fellowship
Relevant answer
Answer
İmran Sarıhasan There are several reasons why government-sponsored Ph.D. honors may be viewed negatively:
1. Lack of credentials: As you noted, some recipients may lack the qualifications required to finish a Ph.D. degree, which can have a negative impact on the quality of research performed in the sector.
2. Misappropriation of funds: Some recipients may misuse their stipends by utilizing them for purposes other than research, which can be viewed as a waste of government resources.
3. Unfairness to other candidates: If the procedure is not fair and open, some candidates with the required qualifications and a willingness to begin a Ph.D. may be overlooked.
4. Affect to academia: The poor quality of research performed by unqualified individuals can tarnish academia's reputation and have a detrimental influence on the field as a whole.
It is also crucial to highlight that government-sponsored Ph.D. prizes can be useful in other ways, such as giving financial support to students who might not otherwise be able to pursue a Ph.D. degree.
To address your concerns, a more rigorous screening procedure for Ph.D. applicants and a committee comprised of residents of the host nation that may evaluate candidates based on their qualifications and ability to contribute to the field may be advantageous. This would guarantee that candidates are chosen fairly and that government resources are used effectively.
  • asked a question related to Academia
Question
5 answers
What was your experience searching for academic jobs for the first time? Were you able to obtain a tenure-track position? How many jobs did you apply to, where did you apply, and what was the hiring process like? Do certain disciplines have better or worse academic job prospects?
What advice do you have for emerging scholars who will start applying for academic jobs in the future?
Relevant answer
Answer
We have different experiences in the rudiments of job hunting with different challenges.
In my case, I was still a graduating student when the president's secretary called me and told me to submit my application for a teaching job. Without a doubt, I drafted my application, did some polishing, and submitted it to the president's office. The Guidance office called me and instructed me to take the psychological examination. I passed the preliminary shortlisting from 165 applicants down to 15. Out of 15, we were cut short to five of us were hired.
Apart from that, I did not experience any other job applications. There were several job offerings from government agencies and even abroad, but I did not find a reason to leave my work at SCC. I started my job as a junior high school instructor, and it lasted for 13 years. I was uprooted from my department to take over the Guidance center's directorship, which I declined for six months because I love teaching and the students. After 14 long years, I loved the job and again created my comfort zone until the president told me to prepare myself for the Vice President for Administration post.
Looking back to my academic job journey, I never aspired to have any of the senior ranks in the academe. My only purpose initially was to get a decent job with decent pay to support my family. For aspiring academic job seekers, simply love your work with all your mind, heart, and soul. Embrace every challenge that comes along and learn from it. Most importantly, take advantage of all the trials and improve by surpassing the more enormous challenges ahead by being innovative and creative and boosting yourself with the necessary soft skills for survival. Don't stop learning. Constant upskilling is a must in the post-modern era to be globally competitive.
  • asked a question related to Academia
Question
2 answers
Apps such as https://chat.openai.com can now collate diverse information in response to a question and compose well phrased readable essays. The are likely to become more capable over time and through better ‘algorithms’ and larger training datasets.
Possible impact areas (more please) :
- ethics
- the process or craft of research
- academic institution processes
- how academic research is owned and monetised
- the drift of academia‘s attention moving to what the apps best facilitate
Relevant answer
Answer
In my opinion, I can see the potential impact of AI-powered text generation in those areas. For instance, ChatGPT or other similar AI systems have the potential to revolutionize several areas of society, including the field of research. They can be used to collate and summarize large amounts of information, provide expert advice, and even generate text, making them a powerful tool for researchers. However, there are also other considerations to take into account.
In terms of ethics, there are concerns about the potential for AI-generated text to be used for malicious purposes, such as impersonation or spreading misinformation. The use of AI-generated text also raises questions about authorship and accountability.
The process or craft of research may be impacted by the ease and speed at which AI can generate text, potentially leading to a decrease in the value placed on originality and creativity in research. It may also make it easier for researchers to quickly produce large quantities of text, potentially leading to a decrease in the quality of research.
Academic institution processes may also be impacted. One potential impact is on academic integrity, as the technology may make it easier for students to plagiarize or cheat on assignments. Additionally, these systems may pose a challenge to the detection of plagiarism and academic misconduct, as they are able to generate unique and original text. Educators may need to adapt their methods for detecting and preventing plagiarism and may need to use technology tools to help them identify AI-generated text. Other areas where AI may impact academic institutions include the automation of repetitive tasks and resource management, which can help educators to focus more on teaching and learning.
The ownership and monetization of academic research may also be impacted. In fact, AI-generated text is making it easier for researchers to produce and publish large quantities of research. Therefore, leading to a decrease in the value placed on original research.
Finally, the drift of attention from academia is moving to what AI best facilitates. As AI-generated text becomes more sophisticated, it may become more useful. Specifically, useful for certain types of research, leading to a shift in the focus of academic research.
  • asked a question related to Academia
Question
50 answers
Both, EU and UK worked intensively for many years to establish close collaborative links in academia and research.
Relevant answer
Answer
Westminster is “still hopeful” on Horizon Europe association, with forthcoming plans for a UK alternative perhaps nudging Brussels to “pick up the phone”, according to the science minister...
  • asked a question related to Academia
Question
3 answers
How can AI tools such as chatGPT be used to conduct research without compromising the value and process?
Relevant answer
Answer
Ask ChatGPT to write you a negative review for movie. ChatGPT can't give you a negative review. It was programmed not to. ChatGPT is smart, but it is not human. Also ChatGPT was disconnected from the internet since before 2022 so it doesn't know about current events. It was disconnected from the internet because the internet corrupts either by satire or misinformation. Also every answer that CHATGPT gives is an essay so it is always confident and even when it doesn't know better it is thus confidently wrong.
A human would say I don't know, but ChatGPT would never say that it doesn't know even if it doesn't know, it thinks it knows. It is dangerous to have it write publications for you since it doesn't know about current events and it is confidently wrong. You can certainly do cool experiments with it to test the limits of AI knowledge.
  • asked a question related to Academia
Question
5 answers
Academic inbreeding is the practice when Ph.D. holders are employed by the same institution that trained them. We invite you to participate in a survey about academic inbreeding in ecology. This survey aims to assess the effect of academic inbreeding on the scientific outputs of ecologists.
If you are an ecologist with Ph.D. and still researching, please share your opinion in the form available on the link below:
Completing the questionnaire will take ca. 5 minutes, the information you shared will be treated as confidential, and your identity remains anonymous.
The survey is available until September 30th, 2022.
Thank you for taking the time to contribute to our project. We have been circulating this survey on Twitter (https://tinyurl.com/22hhmt8z). Please feel free to share this survey with your colleagues in your institution or in your research network.
Best Regards,
Jana Růžičková & Zoltán Elek
Ecologists from ELKH-ELTE-MTM Integrative Ecology Research Group and ELHK Centre for Agricultural Research, Plant Protection Institute, Budapest, Hungary.
Relevant answer
Answer
Hello
I read with interest the comment by Dr @Conroy. I think it points to a problem that is not just in ecology or pathology. It seems to be everywhere and in all areas. Do you think there will ever be any way to “stop” this?
  • asked a question related to Academia
Question
4 answers
I think it depends on the job one looks for. I had some colleagues that landed a job after their Ph.D. with no publication, but the company did not care about that either. If one intends to continue in academia, having publications would definitely help.
Looking forward sharing thoughts, dear colleagues :)
Relevant answer
Answer
No, you have only one chance to write a PhD thesis, but many to publish in the future. A thesis is more detailed and creative than papers, so write a real thesis and publish later :)
  • asked a question related to Academia
Question
8 answers
Dear Colleagues,
I have been formally teaching since 2009 at the university level. Also, I have been pursuing my Ph.D. at the University of Malaya since 2018, now waiting for the final viva.
I am very passionate about teaching and always enjoy sharing my understanding with future generations. Also, my heart is whispering for the Post-Doc.
I am requesting your kind suggestions or directions, especially, regarding what should be my future plan. What is the best time to start my Post-Doc?
Regards
Azizur
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Mr. Rahman!
You spotted a very important topic. Career planning is a great challenge for many during the ongoing turbulent times. Below I searched for YOU articles that might be of value in this regard:
1) Caroline Hill (2022). A lab leader’s guide to hiring a postdoc: It’s worth waiting for the right postdoctoral researcher to come along, says Caroline Hill. But how do you choose the best candidate? Nature 607, 624-625 (2022), Free access: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-022-01729-5
2) Sandra A. Murray, Elsie C. Spencer, Antentor Hinton, The postdoctoral blueprint part one: creating a niche, Trends in Cell Biology, Volume 32, Issue 5, 2022, Open access:
3) Sandra A. Murray, Elsie C. Spencer, Antentor Hinton, The postdoctoral blueprint part two: the faculty application, Trends in Cell Biology, Volume 32, Issue 6, 2022, Open access:
4) E., Degtyarova, I., Kersschot, M., & Boman, J. (2022). Labour market perspectives for PhD graduates in Europe. European Journal of Education, 57, 395–409. h t t p s : //d o i .org/10.1111/ejed.12514, Open access:
5) Fork, M. L., Anderson, E. C., Castellanos, A. A., Fischhoff, I. R., Matsler, A. M., Nieman, C. L., Oleksy, I. A., and Wong, M. Y.. 2021. Creating community: a peer-led, adaptable postdoc program to build transferable career skills and overcome isolation. Ecosphere 12( 10):e03767. 10.1002/ecs2.3767 Open access:
Yours sincerely, Bulcsu Szekely
  • asked a question related to Academia
Question
1 answer
I am PhD candidate in environmental sociology and currently waiting for the viva voce examination that will be expected in December 2022. I just would like to know, what is a good or minimum h-index for Scopus that we can say is a baseline for PhD graduates to be eligible to apply for senior lecturer/ academician post in university?
Relevant answer
Answer
In general this is virtually impossible to say. I depends on numerous variables, think of:
-Difference between the various disciplines
-Differences between countries (and between different universities)
-Other criteria than H-index. I see here on RG that in some countries it depends on number of publications in Scopus and/or papers in journals with an impact factor
-Etc.
I found a source that not looked at number of publications but indeed to the closely related metric the h-index (for more info, and criticism, see for example https://www.aacc.org/cln/articles/2019/september/scientific-impact-and-the-h-index).
They studied your question and they found “A colleague and I surveyed typical values for academic physicians in 14 medical specialties (Am J Clin Pathol 2019;151:286-91). We found that, on average, assistant professors have an h-index of 2-5, associate professors 6-10, and full professors 12-24. These are mean or median values only—the distribution of values at each rank is very wide. If you hope to win a Nobel Prize, your h-index should be at least 35 and preferably closer to 70.”
But this is only studied in the field of medicine. In general I hope that selection is based on more than just counting numbers (publications, citations, etc.).
Best regards.
  • asked a question related to Academia
Question
26 answers
  • the questionable behaviors and actions of some researchers and faculty members in the world of academia are gaining momentum. most of them in the forms of publications, (there might be more, but not In front of eyes)
  • we clearly see that many journals, even top ones allow their EDITORIAL BOARD MEMBERS publish astonishing number of articles in where they edit.
  • take it into consideration that journals are autonomous, outsiders can not ask the reasons
  • but yet an alarming issue is that if we seek the names of those people in other journals that they don't serve (in the same field) , we almost fail to find any articles from them...
  • how is it possible? what could be the value of such papers? how to trust them? what could be their aim(s)?
Relevant answer
Answer
The problem is that very often the authorship is determined without much difficulty (or at least the scientific school to which the author belongs). So "blind" peer review doesn't fully work. There are features in the text (citations, or for example, style) that indicate the author of the publication. Moreover, an experienced reviewer can easily distinguish an article by a "great" scientist from a student's work. Another thing is when the signature of a famous person is put on the work of a beginner (unfortunately, this has become a common practice). The general belief is that a work becomes much more "passable" if a well-known scientist is among the authors (in my opinion, this is name trading, akin to piracy "in the basement" with the subsequent sticker with a brandname). Sometimes journales are created simply to serve own needs - and they can publish yourself as well as "friends", and "trade" the possibility of publication (not always for money, there are other potential advantages). In principle, the decisive word could have been given the consumers - the scientific community, but publishers have consistently excluded its influence - with the advent and expansion of APS and open-access, the consumer does not affect the profitability of the journal in any way. Everything is paid by the author. If somebody have money, print whatever you want.
  • asked a question related to Academia
Question
6 answers
I have a query :
I had written a paper few months ago and its prepreint is floating online.
Query: I want to add more additional results along with modeling in that paper and submit it to some other journal. Can I do the same because a preprint is already floating online? Won't it count in the plagiarism count by the detector? I mean I know preprint is also my earlier version of the same paper but software dont.
Kindly help me with this.
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Prof. Amit Das,
Preprints are defined as an author’s version of a research manuscript prior to formal peer review at a journal, which is deposited on a public server. ResearchGate (RG) said about "Preprints": "early-stage research" and "Draft paper before peer review".
On the other side, RG is not a publisher and, in turn, uploaded unpublished text is not regarded as a publication. Hence, a preprint is an author's own original or draft version of their paper before any peer review has taken place and before it is published. As soon as it's posted, a preprint becomes a permanent part of the scientific record and, in turn, it can be citable with its own unique DOI.
Now, before answering this valuable question of Prof. Aijaz Panhwar, please let me give my own opinion about the preprint dilemma (مُعضلة ما قبل الطباعة):
I have a different perspective on uploading any preprint anywhere before it has been published. Why do you let others know about your insights and methodologies before publication? You should avoid telling the other researchers about the details of any one of your papers until it has been published and seeing your name by yourself. You may say that I am somewhat old-fashioned, but I have a different perspective on uploading any preprint anywhere before it has been published by your name. My advice is not to put your research anywhere until it is published. It is a security issue:
  • Your manuscript may be copied and then published by others before you can do that. This stealing of your paper might be happening. So, you must wait until the paper is accepted and then published in that journal. Then, upload that research item on any platform you wish.
  • You should avoid telling the other researchers about the details of any one of your papers until it has been published and you are seeing your name by yourself.
  • A journal may have automated plagiarism software to check the paper before admitting it to the reviewing process. There are chances that your paper can get a rejection at any point. Thus, to avoid this problem. Publish the preprint after you got the paper as "ACCEPTED".
  • There may be a "cold war" between the professors of a given department. They do not like to discuss ideas as others will "steal" them and publish an article on them without giving credit to the one from whom they got the idea. My suggestion is to keep your work "private" and share it only with those who are really interested.
  • Academic publishing remains a competitive process. If someone else has recently published a paper very similar to mine, mine is less likely to be accepted. So although I may share my topic, I prefer to keep my methodology, findings, and discussion private, until published in a peer-reviewed journal. So, there is a high chance that someone may claim your idea as theirs!
  • Preprint gives a false feeling of security. Personally, I would always wait until the paper is accepted by the editor of a journal. After that, I can post it as a regular research item on any platform you wish.
  • A reminder for all respected researchers: Don't put any research, including preprint, anywhere until you are certain that it is published and tagged with your name. The information presented in the preprint is potentially available to be stolen and republished. There is also a chance that someone may plagiarize your paper!
Finally, for the coming future, do not upload any paper anywhere until it is published with your name. Even if it is a "preprint"! For the time being, If you had done something like that as a "preprint", for instance, I advise you to delete the preprint from any elsewhere and wait for two months before sending the paper to any journal.
  • asked a question related to Academia
Question
3 answers
I wish to know if a PhD in hydrogeology is relevant in getting a job outside Academia, and if it is, what are the possible job opportunities?
Relevant answer
Answer
Yes, a Ph.D holder in hydrogeology can work in the following areas:
*Designing of dewatering schemes
* Urban water planning
* Water treatment industries
*Mining operations
* Groundwater Exploration Industries
*Oil Companies ...in the areas involving working with prediction of pore pressures
* Research institutes
* Companies involved with geothermal exploration
* Cleaning of polluted aquifers in coastal areas by various companies
  • asked a question related to Academia
Question
8 answers
I am interested to know the various possibilities and job opportunities in geology that are outside academia. Which fields of geology are relevant in finding jobs outside Academia?
Relevant answer
Answer
Are you a member of the American Association of Petroleum Geologists? If not, I strongly encourage you to join. Student membership is only $10 per year. Their newsletter, The Explorer, has information every month about alternatives to careers in oil and gas. There is an emphasis on the role of geologic careers in bringing the world through the energy transition to net zero. Another good source of career information is the US Geological Survey Publication Warehouse (https://pubs.er.usgs.gov/). Pick some keywords that describe your interests like hydrogeology and do a search. The reports will show you the kind of work being done by geoscientists at USGS. Other governmental agencies in many countries do similar kinds of work so do some research on places you would like to live. Good luck!
  • asked a question related to Academia
Question
9 answers
Colleagues,
Please what is the average number of publications required before one can qualify to be an Associate Professor?
This information is not clearly written in the cyberspace/public domain, hence I need comments from experts in the Academia.
I look forward to hearing from you soon
Relevant answer
Answer
In general, this is as indicated by Wolfgang R. Dick impossible to say. I found a source that not looked at number of publications but at a closely related metric the so-called h-index (for more info, and criticism, see for example https://www.aacc.org/cln/articles/2019/september/scientific-impact-and-the-h-index). They studied your question and they found “A colleague and I surveyed typical values for academic physicians in 14 medical specialties (Am J Clin Pathol 2019;151:286-91). We found that, on average, assistant professors have an h-index of 2-5, associate professors 6-10, and full professors 12-24. These are mean or median values only—the distribution of values at each rank is very wide. If you hope to win a Nobel Prize, your h-index should be at least 35 and preferably closer to 70.”
But this is only studied in the field of medicine. I assume as said by others that it will be different in other disciplines, in different countries (and between different universities) and hopefully depend on more than just counting numbers (publications, citations, etc.).
Bes regards.
  • asked a question related to Academia
Question
1 answer
Defining the dilution factor is very important when we are working at the level of ppb (parts per billion) or ppt (parts per trillion). Other day, I was working on plant biomass samples to analyze available Si (Silicon) in plant biomass. I have gone through several steps of dilution and became so confused about what is DILUTION FACTOR. I did several dilutions at several steps (digestion, adding chemicals, again diluting to come up with the range of AAS) and it became so complicated. As always, I approached Dr. Rafael Santos and he solved this problem very easily, I would say just in 10 minutes when I was struggling for an hour. Finally, Dr. Santos made a good explanation with their whiteboard and step by step he came up with the solution. Again, doing a Ph.D. is not just collecting and analyzing data but also needs to understand the chemistry happening in between. If you don't know how to do it then seek help. Asking someone doesn't mean your basics are not strong, asking someone means you know what you're looking for but you don't know how to approach it. I am thankful to have Dr. Santos as my mentor, peer and guide. PS: Here's complex whiteboard solution in the picture :) #ppb #ppt #help #academia #PhD #chemistry #data #AAS
Relevant answer
Answer
Asking for guidance is the best learning method after attempting a solution.
Sounds like you have a great mentor.
  • asked a question related to Academia
Question
73 answers
What is the best method of avoiding plagiarism when writing a publication, thesis or dissertation in academia?
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear respected colleagues,
Let me point to another critical issue related to plagiarism software-detectors. My friend was accused of plagiarism. Why?
After about five months, his promotion process to associate professor was rejected because of plagiarism. When he checked the promotion report, he found that one of his papers was accused of plagiarism and with a 100% percentage. The reason is that his manuscript was checked by his co-author using one of these checkers. It took him several months time of following up to solve the problem and removing the manuscript from their database. After that long period, he re-apply the promotion order for the second time.
Therefore, plagiarism software may retain a copy of the manuscript in its database. To state the truth, this is depending upon the settings and type of account subscription.
So, you may face a similar situation when you submit your manuscript after plagiarism checking to a journal. It may be rejected instantly because it would show up 100% similarity index.
To solve the problem, it may take several months time of following up and removing the manuscript from their database.
If there were accusations of plagiarism, it is not well for your reputation, in any meaning.
  • asked a question related to Academia
Question
7 answers
I'm not entirely certain how this "Start a discussion" feature works, but I'll give it a shot anyways.
I can't be the only one experiencing a co-author paraphrasing all my work so that person can maintain complete control over the publishing process. Some have said this issue happens often at the graduate level but never at the undergraduate level. I'm a non-traditional 40-something year old student who has extensive experience with civil rights and so I'm particularly sensitive to people trying to pull a fast-one on me.
In this case, the professor glitched a few times which had me researching copyrights and IP laws a long time ago. However, I waited until after graduation to raise the issue because the university has a history of retaliation when people express concerns of possible civil rights violations. The corruption runs deep at this particular institution, which bases most of its decisions on their intentional lack of policies and procedures addressing fundamental rights such as free speech and intellectual property. In other words, they remain silent on key issues in order to have as much lateral discretion as possible when making critical decisions even when those decisions are inconsistent with both laws and ethics and could potentially ruin a student's entire academic career.
One of the biggest red flags I noticed early on was the professor neglected to go over the section in our textbook that addresses authorship order and publishing rights in the chapter titled "Research Ethics."
I think my mistake was taking for granted that I viewed this entire project as my own because it was based almost entirely on my research into safe consumption sites. The experimental design, methodologies, protocols, and procedures were created by myself during her class in "Research Methods" as graded assignments. It was, and always has been, my original ideas and content from the very beginning; it just never occurred to me that this professor could, or would, even try to scrub me out like this. I trusted this person and considered her a friend and mentor!
Looking back, I cannot remember even a single instance where we had this conversation despite it being a core principle of the American Psychology Association Code of Ethics. The professor is a licensed psychologist and my degree was in psychology so you'd think that would have been something we should have covered at least once. Right?
Has anyone else experienced issues similar to this? How did you handle it? What should I do, or have done, to prevent this from becoming an issue?
Relevant answer
I find the following important note on the Wikipedia:
"A study found that over half of the uploaded papers appear to infringe copyright because the authors uploaded the publisher's version."
To see this note, you can refer to the following link
  • asked a question related to Academia
Question
28 answers
It is the trending topic for a publisher this week.
I want to learn the opinion of Academia members. Is it due to environmental factors or personal over-ambition?
Why does anyone commit fraud?
Relevant answer
Dear Prof. Ferhan Kuyucak Sengur and all the respected RG colleagues,
This respected portal (i.e. RG) defines plagiarism as:
The term “plagiarism” has different meanings, but it usually includes copying somebody else’s work without permission.
On the other side, self-plagiarism is when the author republishes portions of his/her own previously written research work while authoring a new work.
I may be somewhat old-fashioned, but please have a look at the following golden principles on how to avoid plagiarism in academic writing, especially Self-Plagiarism:
  1. Never use the "Copy-Paste" trend: Use your own words instead of copying the words of others. Needless to say that if you are using your own words, then there is no chance of plagiarism accusing.
  2. Never repeat yourself: There are many re-published articles that are slightly or even considerably modified, and still not changed!
  3. If you have co-authors, just trust your words!
  4. If you use your own words, there should be no plagiarism issue. In turn, there is no need for the tools of plagiarism checking. Since there is no guarantee that the original content of your manuscript might not be copied and sold to others before it is published by you, I discourage using any free-software checkers for plagiarism; some of them are betrayers. Despite that offline ones are rare and if you are insisting to use anti-plagiarism software, offline checker programs are safer than online ones.
  5. In some cases, you can paraphrase the sentences in the original document. But don't forget to write a reference.
  6. You must always insist on honesty. Furthermore, you have to always remember that there should be a new added value.
  7. You must always insist on doing real research, not "Wikipedia" research.
  8. Do not put any of your research work anywhere until it is published and tagged with your name. Please wait until the paper is accepted and then published in that journal. Then, upload that research item on any platform you wish.
  9. Despite that offline ones are rare and if you are insisting to use anti-plagiarism software, offline checker programs are safer than online ones.
  10. In my opinion, most of the free-software-checkers for plagiarism don't work effectively. Unfortunately, you have to pay for the sake of getting good results.
  11. Try to develop your own style for the text writing.
  12. Try to read as much scientific literature as possible, especially in your own research field area.
  13. A reminder for all respected researchers: In order to maintain research integrity, plagiarism (الاستلال) has to be given up. However, many people do not know whether they are committing plagiarism intentionally or unintentionally.
Finally, believe me, or not: If you make one plagiarizing, you may solve one problem and fall into many others where some of which may be described as a knockout. Again and again, please always remember that if there were accusations of plagiarism, it is not well for any researcher's reputation, in any meaning.
  • asked a question related to Academia
Question
8 answers
A preprint is a version of a scientific manuscript posted on a public server prior to formal peer review. As soon as it's posted, the preprint becomes a permanent part of the scientific record, citable with its own unique DOI.
Relevant answer
One of my friends was accused of plagiarism; do you know why?
After about three months, his research paper was rejected because of plagiarism. When he checked the journal report, he found that his paper was accused of plagiarism with a 61% percentage. The reason is that his manuscript was previously uploaded as a preprint. It took him another two months to solve the problem and remove the manuscript from the database of the preprint.
So, in order to solve this type of issue, it may take several months of following up to remove the manuscript from the database of the preprint. Anyhow, If there were accusations of plagiarism, it is not well for any researcher's reputation, in any meaning.
  • asked a question related to Academia
Question
54 answers
The question is prompted by this terrific talk by Jonathan Haidt, which I urge you to watch in full: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gatn5ameRr8
Relevant answer
Answer
For starters, let's call social justice what it really is: activism. Activism should never be the goal of a university. Now, that is not to say that activism has no place in the academic community, but it should never be the goal of a university.
The primary reason social justice should not be the goal of a university is because it is motivated by ideology, not understanding. The moment an educational institution shifts it's focus from truth to ideology, we've effectively transitioned from education to indoctrination.
  • asked a question related to Academia
Question
1 answer
Are you a PhD holder working outside academia in the UK and graduated between 2014-2019? Do you want to contribute to a research project? How is your experience? Do you carry out research in your organisation? Does the PhD has helped you in your position?
We'd like to interview you to learn about your trajectory! Check the project’s website for more details: http://tinyurl.com/phdproj
If you want to participate, reply to this discussion or leave your contact information at this link: http://tinyurl.com/phdout.
We’d welcome your spreading this message.
Thanks! #beyondacademia #phd #careeradvancement #leavingacademia
Relevant answer
Answer
Although I haven't done PhD yet, I would like to participate. Is it possible?
  • asked a question related to Academia
Question
3 answers
As an old-generation researcher, a teacher educator and a university teacher for two decades, I have the following endless frustrations and uncertainties.
Many old-generations of top-rank professors and reputable academic giants [not me] have high-quality research publications (e.g. books, monographs, unpublished keynote speech papers and high-rank international journal papers) which have no electronic version or no doi so far. Scanned copies for sharing at RG or other circumstances might infringe copyrights or intellectual property rights (especially co-authored research works). And figures in citation index, citations, research interests and RG scores do not necessarily infer their prolific research works or vice versa which seem NOT to be transparent in ResearchGate or other academic citation platforms like Academia.
New RG measures like intuitive, transparent, robust and relevant might not help much in such case (especially measuring the quality of old-generations scholars)!
So my questions posed to the intellectual world: How to evaluate the quality of research works? What are reliable and valid measurement indicators for comparing young and old generations' academic works?
Could you share with me your novel ideas and possible answers here? And once you get some answers from your university colleagues and students towards these forwarded questions, please put them here afterwards for further reflections.
Many thanks!
From Percy KWOK
Relevant answer
Answer
I agree that one method is the use of the number of citations of the article. Typically if an article has 5 to 10 citations, that's considered very good!
Also look at the impact factor of the journal where the article is published, which is essentially the journal's overall citation factor. An impact factor of 10 or more is generally considered very good. A score of 3 or less is good or average. In most disciplines there's a journal with an exceptionally high impact score. They are cited a lot!
In healthcare, which I consider home base, The New England Journal of Medicine has an impact score of 91. If the article you are evaluating is in a journal with a high impact score, you can be assured the article has been reviewed very stringently.
Good luck with your study!
  • asked a question related to Academia
Question
5 answers
Does a good CV with an extensive publication record, industry and academia experience, pedagogy/teaching experience in universities, multidisciplinary interests and a variety of skills and trainings really create uncertainty in postdoc hiring?
Does it look like exaggerate? Should CVs be simpler?
Do professors prefer people with less extensive profiles when hiring as postdocs or is it something else?
I have been applying for postdoc positions recently but someone told me that your CV is too detailed and looks exaggerated. It might confuse professors. Is that true?
#postdoc
Relevant answer
Answer
I am not asking for a personal advice guys, neither is this about me. The question is whether it happens or not and if it happens what is the reason behind it? You are learned scholars expected to have better comprehension and understanding of the issue. Please respond to what’s being asked in the question and keep it generalised if you want to add to the discussion. Thanks!
  • asked a question related to Academia
Question
5 answers
Through the usage of PERMA Profiler developed by Butler and Kern (2016) that is model by Dr. Martin Seligman's PERMA Theory of Well Being. Is there a relationship between the well being and academic performance in the field of academia?
Relevant answer
Answer
Er. Surinder Paul Sondhi.. Thank you for answering my question. My follow up question is what is your claim that there really is a significant relationship of well being and academic performance by using the PERMA profiler?
  • asked a question related to Academia
Question
8 answers
Recently all Peer-Reviewed (SCI) Journals are consistently supporting open access publishing practices. My concern is that, it will not be very arduous for researchers from poor country to publish articles in such journals?. Most of researchers from different countries who cannot afford that much money due to lack of research grants including funds crisis etc.. Is this really a good move in scientific academia?. It is like benefiting the same rich sections and it seem like scientific business rather than good freely quilty research? Now the house is open for enlightened thought in this regard.
Relevant answer
Answer
Your worries are valid and I am with you on this one. However, I believe that researchers from poor countries can choose to partner with foreign institutions to get their papers funded. Like any other industry, it is always the fittest that gets served. Football, for instance, does not consider that some poor countries might not have the resources toward the best coaches and players. It has become an it-is-what-it-is world.
  • asked a question related to Academia
Question
4 answers
Closed
Relevant answer
Best wishes. I'm believing my inputs can be of importance.
  • asked a question related to Academia
Question
1 answer
Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces (RIS/IRS) research area has received too much hype by academia, but very little attention from Industry and telecom companies around the world (except for ZTE, which is doing something not really exactly IRS, but they call it IRS to benefit from the insane hype going on in order to market and promote their products).
So, if anyone knows the reason for this, then please share your thought with the research community to provide the researchers with new insights and help save them time, effort, and money.
My humble thought is that the reason why RIS/IRS didn't get the attention of companies is because of the fact that most of the research related to Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces (RIS/IRS) is built on top of many impractical assumptions.
Relevant answer
Answer
My humble thought on that is this Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces (RIS/IRS) didn't get the attention and interest of the industry because most of the research conducted on Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces (RIS/IRS) is built on top of many impractical assumptions.
  • asked a question related to Academia
Question
1 answer
Hi all,
I am currently working out a PhD topic and working with tight timelines.
I am thinking of doing a research on how 'wokeness' and heightened sensitivity to racial and gender is impacting team cohesion and productivity.
Some studies have argued that having a racially diverse team for example leads to less workplace complains. I however think that this could simply be a symptom of workers doing just their bit, avoiding socialisation lest they risk being 'mistaken'.
1. Can I get some opinions regarding this area.
2. Will it be more appropriate to pick one end (Either gender or race)?
3. Can I leave this open to workers in General or narrow down to a sector e.g Care homes or Academia?
4. Could someone please help me with how such a topic would be drafted?
Please Help.
Dennis
Relevant answer
Answer
Hello Dennis Otieno re: How wokeness' and heightened sensitivity to racial... [word missing racial diversity? or do you mean racism?] and gender is impacting team cohesion and productivity
I always advise some definition of terms before plunging ahead with literature reviews and topic focus. (I am not a specialist in your topic and my comments are made with best intentions - not trying to be critical).
I see from your profile you are studying in economics and business. How are you using and defining "wokeness?"
  • Have you considered the degree to which the concept of 'woke' has been co-opted - especially by those who by definition are not and cannot be 'woke'?
  • Have you reflected on how the meaning of 'woke' has been diluted - especially by marketing and economics (woke capitalism and corporate woke) usage?
How are you using the term gender?
  • Are you referring to biological sex or are you using gender in terms of people's self identification, expression and presentation regardless of biological or assigned sex?
  • A you prepared and equipped to take on a multivariate and fluid contemporary spectrum of meaning for the term gender?
Once you clarify your thoughts on those terms then I suggest you conference with your thesis advisors(s) and map out a promiscuous literature review, not just in terms of teams (cohesion and productivity) but also in other related contexts.
Just some thoughts and best wishes,
Leo
  • asked a question related to Academia
Question
4 answers
As A PHD Student, I accumulate resources that are important such as Power Points and other documents. I have learnt my initiation into academia that it is important to make reference to sources. Is it different with online research?
Relevant answer
Answer
Not at all. Using another author's work is a serious violation of academic honesty. It is known by various names: stealing and, of course, plagiarism. However, your question was good. First, it shows you have the insight to suspect it's not right. Second, many students think that if it is on the Internet, you can just take it. I commend you for asking and now you will avoid the consequences.
  • asked a question related to Academia
Question
1 answer
In many universities, notably in North America but most likely around the world, there are five-year reviews of professors throughout the careers. The reviews can take the form of assembling pretty well everything they have done in the previous five-year period, including providing vast documentary evidence of satisfactory (or even outstanding) performance in teaching, research and scholarship, and service (and, if applicable, in administration). This is generally an extremely time-consuming, intense and potentially stressful experience, and, equally, it is not always clear what the value of this exercise is. In addition to the potential for (conscious and unconscious) bias throughout the process as well as a number of forms and sometimes quantitative configurations, there is also the normative consideration of ensuring that full weight of given to the contributions that are presented for review. Although the broader public may not be aware of the working conditions within academia, it is important to note that, generally speaking, there are a number of regular evaluation-points that professors routinely must face, including: annual reviews, tenure and promotion reviews, grant proposals, conference presentations, articles and other publications, sabbaticals, teaching evaluations by students, some positions and committees, research chairs, etc.. My question seeks to understand—if there is already robust, intense, high-stakes, regular and relatively comprehensive evaluation of academic performance—is there (significant) added value to these five-year reviews? I am aware of some universities that have eliminated them, and others that have re-negotiated the requirements, but they do remain for the most part intact. Do they support and cultivate more enhanced engagement and performance? How? Would the time and resources required for this process be better spent in cultivating more enhanced engagement and performance?
Relevant answer
Answer
I think it is a system that the university can encourage its staff, and to qualify them for the future.Regards.
  • asked a question related to Academia
Question
9 answers
I want to ask others opinion on what career choices should one make right after a PhD in Engineering.
1) Should one choose academia, or the industry (R&D) etc.? What are the pros and cons?
Or,
2) Should one find a Post Doctoral position first for 1-2 years. Then move towards an academic career as an Assistant Professor? Does the post-Doc cause a major difference to your career prospects?
3) Can one start an industry career after a Post-Doc?
4) In some countries, one can become an Assistant Professor right after PhD? is this Path advisable?
Please share your thoughts.
Relevant answer
Answer
I personally recommend choosing an Industrial R&D position for the following reasons:
1. It will expand your capabilities far beyond academia.
2. You will be able to explore new areas of research under the guidance of experts.
3. Solving real-life problems is a different experience.
4. From the conceptual design of the product to the market landing, you are learning and acquiring knowledge about the product.
5. Have high career development opportunities and considerable income.
6. After gaining some industry experience, you can move into academia while maintaining an industry touch.
7. Industrial exposure will help you instruct students in a more practical way.
There's a lot more to say, but please take this as a comprehensive summary.
Hope this helps you.
  • asked a question related to Academia
Question
1 answer
Have you seen any references to how many surveys and respondents are engaged per year outside of academia. I found one reference on SurveyMonkey's usage, but would love help in finding more.
Relevant answer
Answer
It is not usually a good practice to reference things outside of peer-reviewed content, as non-academic content has great risk of bias and faulty instrument(s).
  • asked a question related to Academia
Question
3 answers
Dear all,
I am currently recruiting participants to take part in my thesis project. I am investigating the relationship between self-efficacy, learned helplessness and parental psychological control from a transgenerational perspective.
The study has received ethical approval from Northumbria University (45055).
We are looking for participants who meet the following criteria:
• A resident in the United Kingdom (UK)
• Grew up in a two-parent household
• Currently have school-aged children
• Parent those children with a stable long-term partner who lives in the same household
The study will involve answering a set of demographic questions, questions about the parenting style received from your own parents, the parenting style you use with your own children, and questions measuring your levels of both self-efficacy and learned helplessness.
If you have any further questions regarding the study, please contact me at beth.sheerin@northumbria.ac.uk.
To find out more information about the study and to take part, please go to:
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi Beth,
One of my Ph.D. constructs is Self-efficacy. I have taken this component as motivation in my research. Do not hesitate to any other matter for your future endeavor.
Best, DM, Nepal
  • asked a question related to Academia
Question
24 answers
What is the highest amount of rounds of peer review one of your publications has gone through with a single journal before receiving a final decision? Also, how long did it take to go through all those rounds of peer review? I'm trying to get a sense of what is typical.
Relevant answer
Answer
Usually two rounds, with a record of five, including a "Editor-in-Chief" review once officially accepted by the Article editor.
  • asked a question related to Academia
Question
3 answers
Any suggestions on how to pivot to policy making?
I saw that there are PhD about it, but I'm not sure to be qualified for them.
How could I increase the chances of being admitted to one without pursuing another master?
I'm finishing a double master in plant sciences and plant biotechnology at Wageningen University & Research. My specialisations are functional plant genomics and phytopathology and entomology, with a minor in nematology and one still to define (around biophysics and omics).
I did a thesis in nematology at the ETH Zurich, one in plant molecular biology at INRAE (French national institute for Agro-Environmental research) and one still to define at SLU (Swedish Agricultural University).
I'd like to pivot toward policy making, but I only have a few courses about transversal skills such as "Negotiation skills", "Communication & Persuasion", "Scientific Writing" etc. and none about policy itself.
Relevant answer
Answer
Great suggestion by Sally Elkady . I would suggest that you get into a PhD program focusing on Transdisciplinary research which straddles both policy-making and Biology. You have studied Phytobiology ( plant ecology), entomology, and genomics. I think it is a great combo to explore the impact of GM seeds and variants on friendly insects and plant ecology. This is exactly what is needed to influence policy. Your research comes would be suggested policy direction or changes that would ensure that ecology and friendly insects are protected for sustainable farming. Hope this helps.
  • asked a question related to Academia
Question
13 answers
Different cultures have different standards on issues such as plagiarism and authorship.
Relevant answer
Answer
First, ethics is indivisible principles because it is a system of values, constants and standards. Second, ethics, like other concepts, are subject to change, declining or progressing according to the ethics, beliefs and freedoms prevailing in each society. The more societies adhere to history, originality and values, the stronger their system will be, and vice versa.
  • asked a question related to Academia
Question
3 answers
Dear all, starting tomorrow, from 4pm GMT (Lisbon time), a Webinar on "Sustainable tourism in action" will take place, where interesting new insights on the topic will be discussed by speakers from all over, representing the Academia, Government, Business and Citizens. Register, watch, participate by asking questions! Here's the registration link that will then allow you to assist the event in real time: https://lnkd.in/gZ8jV3r Cheers and hope to see you tomorrow!
Relevant answer
Answer
For anyone who missed it and would like to watch it, here's the link of the webinar:
--
Cheers,
Ivana
  • asked a question related to Academia
Question
3 answers
I'm finishing a double master in plant sciences and plant biotechnology at Wageningen University & Research. My specialisations are functional plant genomics and phytopathology and entomology, with a minor in nematology and one still to define (around biophysics and omics).
I did a thesis in nematology at the ETH Zurich, one in plant molecular biology at INRAE (French national institute for Agro-Environmental research) and one still to define at SLU (Swedish Agricultural University).
I'd like to pivot toward policy making, but I only have a few courses about transversal skills such as "Negotiation skills", "Communication & Persuasion", "Scientific Writing" etc. and none about policy itself.
Any suggestions on how to pivot to policy making? I saw that there are PhD about it, but I'm not sure to be qualified for them. How could I increase the chances of being admitted to one without pursuing another master?
Relevant answer
Answer
You're simply trying to vilify me to cover your inappropriate behaviour. Again, please refrain from continuing.
  • asked a question related to Academia
Question
3 answers
Academia journals (https://www.academiajournals.com) is a predatory publisher? I think so, but I still haven't found it on any blacklist. Could someone point me to a place where this editorial can be evidenced please?
Relevant answer
Answer
This is a tough one. They are part of PDHTech, LLC which was established in San Antonio, TX in 2006 (https://www.academiajournals.com/pdhtech ). They are (indeed) not included in for example the Beall’s list, not because they are good but most likely because they used to publish subscription-based journals (only since 2020 they publish according to the open access model). They seem to focus on organizing conference but according to https://www.academiajournals.com/inicio-revistas they publish a number of journals as well. Hard to say whether they are predatory or not. I do see some disturbing things:
-One of their journals is called “Journal of Industrial Engineering” (Revista de la Ingeniería Industrial) ISSN 1940-2163 which looks suspiciously similar as “Revista Ingeniería Industrial” e-ISSN: 0718-8307 p-ISSN: 0717-9103 http://revistas.ubiobio.cl/index.php/RI (which looks like a genuine and legit journal)
-After quite some effort (their website is not that informative) one can find the physical address info (346 Grassmarket, San Antonio, Tx 78259-2322, Texas) which corresponds to a nice residence but is not resembling anything close to a headquarter/office
-According to https://www.academiajournals.com/inicio-revistasthey charge a fee of 190 USD for all their journals
-Besides EBSCO none of their journals have any kind of indexing (despite the fact that some are around for quite some years)
-The papers are poorly edited and lack received and acceptance info (and have no DOI)
-I was unable to find editorial board info
So, predatory? I tent to say no but looking at above points I think that there is not much to gain by publishing with them. They still have to take a lot of steps before they can be considered as a serious publisher.
Best regards.
  • asked a question related to Academia
Question
3 answers
In my upcoming research on Big Data architecture, I'd like to make use of data from some of the best conferences I've attended ( practice-led conferences not academic ones )
What's the most rigorous methodology to capturing data from a video in academia ?
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Pouya Ataei,
I think you have got your answer. Ajit Singh has explained the most preferred methodology for capturing data from video and also the procedure to analyze video data elaborately and very clearly.
Best wishes,
Razina Sultana
  • asked a question related to Academia
Question
3 answers
Scientist-entrepreneur Javier Garcia Martinez recalls combining an academic role at the University of Alicante, Spain, while getting a catalyst start-up called Rive Technology off the ground.
The experience, he says, taught him that a so-called barrier between academia and other sectors is no more than a state of mind. “To me, it feels all part of the same thing. It’s our own mindset that puts different activities in different silos,” he tells Julie Gould. Martinez adds: “I was studying, discovering better catalysts, you know, in my academic lab, also in my company, and at the same time talking to customers, to investors, to raise money, and to put that into a commercial plan.
Relevant answer
Answer
I previously taught at 4 different universities while conducting my own clinical research so as to avoid a potential conflict of interest involving these two roles. So I was very careful in this regard.
Now being retired, I am free to be me!!
Rich
  • asked a question related to Academia
Question
32 answers
Dear friends
One thing I noted in academia is that competition can sometimes be just as fierce as in the world of business.
Sometimes it can be small and petty like who should be first author, often triggered by purely selfish reasons and following justifications.
In other cases competition can be about grands, effectively rendering someone unemployed in some cases. I have seen bullying, discrimination more frequently than in the world of business, the place I come from.
This is truly the dark side of academia, there are also positive things but these are things that make me sick to my stomach.
What is your experience? Do you agree with my rather dark view? If not, why? If yes, how can we fix it?
Best wishes Henrik
Relevant answer
Answer
A first offhand very general remark: Market rules and habits infiltrated into sciences tend to deform scientific explorations and divert individual efforts to some sort of racing competitions...
  • asked a question related to Academia
Question
9 answers
How could you judge someone by publication and impact factor of journal or publisher?
What you think it’s easy to publish work in a high impact factor journal without funding? Nature and MDPI and Hindwai and PlosOne and other good journals are open access...and having Article processing charges...
  • asked a question related to Academia
Question
2 answers
Complexity is an area (field, paradigm???) that presently spans through many scientific fields. From Mathematics and (so called) Econophysics to Biology and Social Sciences.
And, yes, there are many researchers of Complexity in all of them.
But in my literature revision, when writing an article, I realized that Edgar Morin's La Méthode (a work of six volumes) does not have an English version.
The fact that Morin is alive at 100 years old and perhaps one of the most important philosophers of our time (in Complexity, certainly) is just as incomprehensible as to know that I read in Portuguese with a very good translation and it is also published in Spanish (I did not research other possible translations).
What makes me also conviced that, if a person of that magnitude can be ignored by academia establishment, what to ponder about the thousands of scientic minds not living in the so called "central countries" that might have relevant contributions to science.
Relevant answer
Answer
It might have the English version. Just share this comment with the RG community to see if they have it or not.
  • asked a question related to Academia
Question
99 answers
How do you judge the success of a particular presentation st conferences, workshops and seminars?
Kindly share your valued opinion. Best regards
Relevant answer
Answer
Clarity and coherence of the presented ideas
  • asked a question related to Academia
  • asked a question related to Academia
Question
11 answers
People are searching for certainty in Science and that’s the opposite of what leads to scientific breakthroughs. How to deal with this?
Relevant answer
Answer
Skepticism is an important part of scientific progress, since Xenophanes and Democritus .The Greek word skepsis means investigation; by calling themselves skeptics, the ancient skeptics and Hellenic philosophers described themselves as investigators. Doubt is an essential part of the scientific measurement method to match data and real phenomena by experimental and empirical testing, with respect to select a 'working hypothesis', in terms of applying knowledge successfully and tech-know-logically.
  • asked a question related to Academia
Question
3 answers
Hi guys,
Can you tell me the most efficient way to find the top conferences (e.g., 1-3) in different research disciplines?
The top conferences should be well-known and well-recognised ones, which is popular that attracting leading researchers and scientists from both academia and the industry to contribute and participate.
Thanks in advance!
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Zongchen Li,
It is impossible to rank "the top international conferences"! What kind of variables/indicators should be used?
The rankingmania is a very dangerous issue and it would be better to build our opinion looking for objective data: the number of past editions, the number of participant, the number/type of scientific partners (universities, research labs...), the availability of grant/awards for young researchers, the proceedings' publication (printed or on-line, with ISBN or ISSN)...
So, the better way to choose the best option is to keep informed (newsletters and feeds in your discipline) and to detect the predatory congress (see https://beallslist.net/).
Best wishes,
  • asked a question related to Academia
Question
11 answers
There are varying views on the age, relevance and adequacy of reference materials acceptable for use in academic writings. Might be project papers, conference and journal papers as well as thesis write-ups for Masters and PhD assessments.
Some say 4-5 years or younger references, Some say as long as it is relevant, some say there should be an acceptable ratio of old references to new references eg 20%(old) :80%(new). Some would boldly say for a conference paper not less than 15, for a review paper not less than 120 etc
How would you consider the relevancy of references?
How about the adequacy of references?
Relevant answer
Answer
I absolutely agree with Dr Muhammad Zia Aslam opinion.
  • asked a question related to Academia
Question
9 answers
What makes a researcher independent and how this can be practised? How to enable any such skill among PhD/Post-Doc students, or even before that stage? Please Feel Free to add your observation, arguments and experience.
Relevant answer
Answer
Thanks, Dr. Aung Ze Ya.
  • asked a question related to Academia
Question
7 answers
If one is working in R&D, the company allows/wants to publish information that proves claims of the company and its cutting-edge technology- Clearly, the company prevents the publication of any information that might harm its business. Additionally, the company has no interest in having an employee publishing reviews or anything else.
How can someone publish independently from the company?
For sake of argument, let's assume that one wants to write a review on his own time at home without any data acquired through the company.
Relevant answer
Answer
This depends on the content of the publication. If it is not related to the work in the company, than there is no problem. The constitutions of many countries guarantee the freedom of science. However, if the publication contains results obtained at the company, the situation is more complicated. If possible, one should consult with someone responsible in the company to avoid legal actions.
  • asked a question related to Academia
Question
14 answers
Reputed journals like Nature, Scientific Reports, PlosOne, BMC series few Springer, Elsevier Journals are all charging hefty amounts from authors just to put their reseach open access,
Its only a pdf to be put online
Mo printing charges
No formatting charges
Relevant answer
Answer
Here are some of my replies from several previous discussions:
There is no direct connection between the subscription business model of a journal and publication fees. Whether there is a publication fee or not depends on the finance model of the journal in general. Some journals have low costs and sells well or get donations, so they may publish without fees for authors.
The publication of scientific articles always costs money (paying the staff of the publisher, servers, printing costs, taxes, ...). Most of the large scientific journals are being published on the basis of subcriptions by libraries, at least partially. Other parts of their financial models are APCs (Article Processing Charges) and payments for downloading articles. The question is, who raises this money - the readers, the authors or third institutions; at least not the publishers, who are private enterprises and have to work economically. To demand financing from the publishers is unrealistic. Today there are not enough paying subscribers, so that the authors, sponsors or readers have to pay.
The real question is who can finance the publication. Since there are not enough subscribers for the many journals and the authors often cannot cover the costs, sponsors must be sought. Publication costs must be taken into account as early as the research planning stage.
For developing countries the question is how these additional costs for publication of the results can be raised. There is no such thing as "free" publication, in all cases someone has to pay the costs.
The problem of financing scientific publications is as old as science is. When you read, e.g., an extended biography of Johannes Kepler (beginning of 17th century), you will learn about his problems when seaking financial support for printing his works. "Open access and free of charge" does not mean that it is free of costs. In this case, an institution is paying the costs of staff, server maintainance, printing, etc. To "create a platform in which we control our science and make it completely free of access", there has to be an international organization which will organize and finance it. You will need a staff similar to privat publishers. Where will its finances come from? Those who are familiar with international organizations like UN know the difficulties of organizing large projects on an international level. If you wish a single platform for all sciences, the difficulties will be tremendous. It is possible to publish free and open-access journals at the level of institutes and societies, but each of them is for a narrow field. Although I agree that a "free" and open access platform for all sciences would be a nice thing, I do not see ways to realize it.
Publishers are privat enterprises, so they have to pay their staff, pay for their offices, for all hardware, for software, for advertisement, pay taxes, etc. Large publishers with high-ranking journals are mostly stock companies or similar and therefore they also have to pay dividends to stockholders. However, as for all companies it is nearly impossible to get details of their business model.
Publication fees are mainly there to cover the publisher's costs, fully or partially. The profit comes from the sale of printed or online journals by subscription and the sale of individual articles as PDF files.
Extreme costs for publishing are also a consequence of the monopolization. The tendency to publish only in "high-impact" journals is another reason for monopolization. This tendency is a consequence of the "fixation on bibliometric indicators" by the actors in science governance - see demand No. 3 of the petition "Stop Tracking Science" (https://www.researchgate.net/post/Petition_Stop_Tracking_Science).
Publishing is a private business. Therefore, when you ask whether high costs for open access are ethical or not you may also ask whether profits of billions of dollars by private companies like Google, Amazon, etc. and by their private owners are ethical in general. Indeed, the profit rates of some large publishers are extremely high. One of the reasons is the run for high-impact journals and the monopolization which follows from this preference. Although there are many small publishers, the free market does not really work. Another negative side of the impact-factor fetish are manipulation, fraud and other scientific misconduct.
I do not agree at all with the way some publishers do business. However, this is a free market as any other business. There is no worldwide conspiracy by publishers to suck scientists dry. If there is so much money to be made here, why aren't there more big publishers? Of course, there is also monopolization, as everywhere in the economy. But there are also many small publishers and small journals. The problem also lies with the scientists themselves. The greed for high-impact journals leads to the situation that some journals hardly need to fear competition. The whole problem is very complex, and there is no point in portraying publishers as the bogeymen. It requires concrete proposals for improvement. - One of the problems is also that more and more is published and less and less is read. Libraries are no longer able to acquire all the books and journals. As a result, sales figures are falling, so publishers have to raise prices. A vicious circle. More than 50 years ago, Polish philosopher and science fiction writer Stanislaw Lem satirically envisioned a future in which scientists get paid if they don't publish anything. As soon as they publish something, they get a pay cut.
  • asked a question related to Academia
Question
8 answers
How scholarly are the papers and articles published on ACADEMIA Letters in meeting the standards of peer-reviewed articles? Could one confidently cite them in research that is meant for publication in a scholarly journal? I am curious because I appreciate many of the works published with the ACADEMIA Letters and I want to know the value to place on them in the bibliography of my research.
Relevant answer
Answer
I think it's a kind of new initiative that aims at traditional marketing, kindly check:
  • asked a question related to Academia
Question
5 answers
Hi,
I am interesting what is in bioinformatic most requested from companies and academia to find easiest a job? DNA sequence analysis or? Can someone suggest that if you know how to work with something would be in moest companies requested and have good chance to get a job? and is in industry and academia same situation, or is acadamia are different things needed?
What you suggest?
  • asked a question related to Academia
Question
9 answers
Hello Everyone!
This is what I found on the website about the payment
"We aim to publish research worth reading, regardless of the financial circumstances of the author. We offer a waiver program to authors who are unable to pay their APC because of financial hardship. You can apply for the waiver once your submission has been accepted."
So, how reliable is this?
Relevant answer
Answer
If you look at the various discussions here about “Academia Letters” you see two things. First not that many people are enthusiastic about this new initiative of Academia.edu and second that not that long ago they were not transparent about the costs. See for example:
Nowadays they are at least clearer about it: it costs 400 USD. Looking at the text you refer to https://www.academia.edu/letters/submission_faqI personally find this rather vague.
If you decide to try (which I personally would not do see for arguments the various discussions) I would discuss first with the editor (or another contact they refer to) about which amount of payment you need to pay (after a possible waiver) to avoid unpleasant surprises.
Best regards.
  • asked a question related to Academia
Question
3 answers
Looking to use Cas9 for research in a startup (possibly lentiviral), and would like input on what are the legal requirements and how to obtain Cas9 expression vectors (Cas13 is available from Addgene, but Cas9 is available only to academia).
Relevant answer
  • asked a question related to Academia
Question
5 answers
Differentiating Science from Pseudoscience is becoming a challenge at so many levels these days. How can we separate the two and acknowledge a grey area in between?
Relevant answer
Answer
The page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pseudoscience gives a rather good overview about the distinction between science and pseudoscience, about indicators of possible pseudoscience, and about the resons for it. For a discussion of the reasons, see also https://www.researchgate.net/post/What_is_the_explanation_for_the_appearance_of_some_people_who_believe_that_the_earth_is_not_round_and_that_man_has_not_reached_the_moon.
See also these discussions about astrology - for me as an astronomer it is hard to believe how many scientists believe in it:
  • asked a question related to Academia
Question
6 answers
Let me know your thoughts on this topic. Personal experiences are most welcomed especially from those of us who worked in the UK and in other developed economies.
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Kehinde Mary Bello thank you for such interesting news. I believe this may have a lot to do with their salaries not catching up with the inflation, and the same has been the case for several years now, i.e., falling purchasing power or their salaries.
Best wishes
Michal
  • asked a question related to Academia
Question
5 answers
Hi there, I am starting a discussion on working in the academia field. Aside to interest and passion in the field of research, what are the major benefits and disadvantages of working in the academia field?
To me, being a researcher is due to my passion for the property and finance field. While practicing real estate in the corporate world is monetary rewarding, research brings excitement and stimulating, especially when you get to collaborate with researchers from other countries. Aside to these, its also about attending conferences worldwide, able to meet new people, experience and share knowledge.
Feel free to share your thoughts here!
Relevant answer
Answer
What I love about it: flexibility, freedom, independence, conferences, holiday, respect, self-fulfilment, working with mostly smart open-minded colleagues and students, the feeling of making the world a better place through my research and teaching.
potential drawbacks (e.g., in the UK) falling real salary, relatively low salary, too much paperwork and bureaucratic waste of time, forms on top of forms and more forms to fill.
  • asked a question related to Academia
Question
8 answers
As public research is the dominant model, it is interesting to notice that private lucrative publication is the major dissemination channel in academia.
I'm interested in studies about the willingness to share among the researchers.
Understanding why the expensive and in english journal model still impedes knowledge production and dissemination is key in many field of study.
The study of academian capitalism, with journal publications as currencies could help if economist were to see this interrogation.
Relevant answer
  • asked a question related to Academia
Question
14 answers
  1. Reading, working, and researching on the fundamental issues of the Research itself. I , like some others believe that honorary authorship (among other related ideas) is not a healthy act in the world of academia. It is against the goals of higher education. There are too many proofs. But sadly, it is practiced, widely, everywhere, in advanced or developing countries. The negative effects of this phenomenon are mind-blowing.
2. I would like to hear from others. As this (in part) is an outgoing project (added to my RG profile, if you would like to know more).
Thank You
Relevant answer
Answer
I agree with you that honorary authorship should not be considered within the realm of academic research because it merely recognizes individuals based on their contributions in other life aspects.
  • asked a question related to Academia
Question
70 answers
Many humanities scholars, such as from disciplines of literary, cultural and film studies, etc., practice academic journalism which is published in newspapers/magazines. Can Academia Letters be considered a reasonable platform to publish such articles (other than peer-reviewed publications)?
Relevant answer
Answer
In response to Roderic Girle – I cannot help but disagree with your points:
1. Academia.edu may not cost money up front but you pay by giving your data to them and they try lock you in to the platform. This is precisely the trap the world fell in with social media platforms. The cost of making papers open access with traditional publishers is high, but Academia Letters is not the solution for it is not open access.
2. Real academic journals have editorial boards made up of academics who act as the guardians of academic knowledge. Copyrights may be owned by commercial publishing giants but the content is still governed by academics. This is not the case with Academia Letters.
3. The issue is not speed but quality. It is better to have too slow process that produces solid academic knowledge than rapid-fire of low quality publications. Anyone can publish in SSRN or in other open repository in a truly open access manner things that did not make to journals. Therefore, Academia Letters does not seem to solve any real problem in academic publishing.
If 95% of academic papers are not read maybe it is partly that too much low-quality material gets into journals so why do we need another outlet for this kind of stuff?
Also, if only abstracts are read then we should be able to trust the editorial process that the actual papers are solid – which is certainly not the case with Academia Letters.
  • asked a question related to Academia
Question
3 answers
How would i link my research gate paper/ssrn/academia with google scholar account. so published paper will see on google scholar?
Relevant answer
Answer
On Google Scholar you can add manually and add a link to your journal paper.
Go to my citation and edit the required information.
Hope this can help you!
  • asked a question related to Academia
Question
7 answers
Recently I have read the which examined the monetory cost of time spent on peer review by researchers. At this time of the open science movement gradually getting its momentum, a need has arisen to re-examine/re-visit the existing peer review and publishing model.
Relevant answer
Answer
that's what makes science go on: our donations, expertise, time, effort, attitude.
  • asked a question related to Academia
Question
33 answers
Academic incubators of innovation and entrepreneurship are developed at universities to support innovation and entrepreneurship of students. Incubators are also a supplement to the educational program in the field of activating the innovation and entrepreneurship of students. Incubators sometimes also perform functions or cooperate with a career office for students. Career offices collect employment offers and organize internships for students through cooperation with companies and institutions that employ or give practice to students.
Sometimes academic incubators of innovation and entrepreneurship also cooperate with various institutions and companies in which students find employment or take apprenticeships. In addition, academic incubators of innovation and entrepreneurship, cooperating with various institutions and companies, enable the establishment of clusters of innovation, in which various economic entities, public institutions, scientific institutes and universities cooperate with each other. In this way, the possibilities of entrepreneurship development and generation of innovative solutions in assumed and developed research projects and startups are increasing.
Sometimes, also with the innovation cluster or business incubator, financial institutions cooperate, primarily banks offering financial support in the form of preferential loans for developing innovative startups. However, at the early stage of the establishment of business activity by students and organizations, the most important role is provided by substantive support in the field of advising on the formal and legal issues and accounting service of the university, lecturers and employees of the academic entrepreneurship incubator.
Do you agree with my opinion on this matter?
In view of the above, I am asking you the following question:
What is the role of academic business incubators?
Please reply
I invite you to the discussion
Thank you very much
Best wishes
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Roberto - Minadeo,
Yes. I, too, believe, like you, that academic business incubators are an important source of social and business innovation and entrepreneurship.
Thank you, Regards,
Dariusz Prokopowicz
  • asked a question related to Academia
Question
33 answers
Dear all!
I hope you had a wonderful weekend. At the moment Im in the later stages of planning a hopefully good quantitative article in entrepreneurship. I will use connections in the industry (to do the dirty work of actually convincing people to participate )where Im active and my question is, what do you deem to be an acceptable sample size for a questionnaire about decision making, connecting into other areas?
It is a relatively small business community in our country so sample size can not be 1000, if yes there must be a discussion about expanding the geographical area.I know what the literature says but what is your experience regarding minimum sample size in different level journals. No need to say Im a qualitative researcher seeking to make an excursion into enemy territory :-)
Thank you so much for your input in advance.
Best wishes Henrik
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Henrik,
For such quantitative size of survey as You want the best thing is to use Paniott formula. Please, take a glance on Paniott formula on Google.
  • asked a question related to Academia
Question
18 answers
Our research world has become dependant on research output.
Many academic jobs depend on a certain sustained level of research.
Is this unhealthy?
Does it stunt creativity? Does it create pointless research? Does it lead to plagiarism?
Should we have different outcome measures eg a Research Quality Score per article, rather than number of articles?
Relevant answer
Answer
Publication is necessary for sharing knowledge, but publication because you are in an academic race is wrong, it creates Journals and publication houses who thrive on the need.
You need to pull out academicians from this race, by providing ample time and resources for quality research, instead of counting number of publications for career advancement.
  • asked a question related to Academia
Question
4 answers
Hi everyone,
Not really a technical question here, but it has to do very closely with research.
I'm very fascinated by the potential for university-industry collaboration and technology transfer, and I'm curious to understand the perspective of researchers.
What is your experience working with industry as a university researcher?
What works well? What doesn't?
Where do you find the most value in joint projects in collaboration with industry and where are the most critical risks for you?
Relevant answer
Answer
Please have look on our(Eminent Biosciences (EMBS)) collaborations.. and let me know if interested to associate with us
Our recent publications In collaborations with industries and academia in India and world wide.
EMBS publication In association with Universidad Tecnológica Metropolitana, Santiago, Chile. Publication Link: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33397265/
EMBS publication In association with Moscow State University , Russia. Publication Link: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32967475/
EMBS publication In association with Icahn Institute of Genomics and Multiscale Biology,, Mount Sinai Health System, Manhattan, NY, USA. Publication Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29199918
EMBS publication In association with University of Missouri, St. Louis, MO, USA. Publication Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30457050
EMBS publication In association with Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA. Publication Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27852211
EMBS publication In association with ICMR- NIN(National Institute of Nutrition), Hyderabad Publication Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23030611
EMBS publication In association with University of Minnesota Duluth, Duluth MN 55811 USA. Publication Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27852211
EMBS publication In association with University of Yaounde I, PO Box 812, Yaoundé, Cameroon. Publication Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30950335
EMBS publication In association with Federal University of Paraíba, João Pessoa, PB, Brazil. Publication Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30693065
Eminent Biosciences(EMBS) and University of Yaoundé I, Yaoundé, Cameroon. Publication Link: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31210847/
Eminent Biosciences(EMBS) and University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, 48080, Leioa, Spain. Publication Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27852204
Eminent Biosciences(EMBS) and King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Publication Link: http://www.eurekaselect.com/135585
Eminent Biosciences(EMBS) and NIPER , Hyderabad, India. Publication Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29053759
Eminent Biosciences(EMBS) and Alagappa University, Tamil Nadu, India. Publication Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30950335
Eminent Biosciences(EMBS) and Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, Hyderabad , India. Publication Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28472910
Eminent Biosciences(EMBS) and C.S.I.R – CRISAT, Karaikudi, Tamil Nadu, India. Publication Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30237676
Eminent Biosciences(EMBS) and Karpagam academy of higher education, Eachinary, Coimbatore , Tamil Nadu, India. Publication Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30237672
Eminent Biosciences(EMBS) and Ballets Olaeta Kalea, 4, 48014 Bilbao, Bizkaia, Spain. Publication Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29199918
Eminent Biosciences(EMBS) and Hospital for Genetic Diseases, Osmania University, Hyderabad - 500 016, Telangana, India. Publication Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28472910
Eminent Biosciences(EMBS) and School of Ocean Science and Technology, Kerala University of Fisheries and Ocean Studies, Panangad-682 506, Cochin, India. Publication Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27964704
Eminent Biosciences(EMBS) and CODEWEL Nireekshana-ACET, Hyderabad, Publication Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26770024
Eminent Biosciences(EMBS) and Bharathiyar University, Coimbatore-641046, Tamilnadu, India. Publication Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27919211
Eminent Biosciences(EMBS) and LPU University, Phagwara, Punjab, India. Publication Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31030499
Eminent Biosciences(EMBS) and Department of Bioinformatics, Kerala University, Kerala. Publication Link: http://www.eurekaselect.com/135585
Eminent Biosciences(EMBS) and Gandhi Medical College and Osmania Medical College, Hyderabad 500 038, India. Publication Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27450915
Eminent Biosciences(EMBS) and National College (Affiliated to Bharathidasan University), Tiruchirapalli, 620 001 Tamil Nadu, India. Publication Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27266485
Eminent Biosciences(EMBS) and University of Calicut - 673635, Kerala, India. Publication Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23030611
Eminent Biosciences(EMBS) and NIPER, Hyderabad, India. ) Publication Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29053759
Eminent Biosciences(EMBS) and King George's Medical University, (Erstwhile C.S.M. Medical University), Lucknow-226 003, India. Publication Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25579575
Eminent Biosciences(EMBS) and School of Chemical & Biotechnology, SASTRA University, Thanjavur, India Publication Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25579569
Eminent Biosciences(EMBS) and Safi center for scientific research, Malappuram, Kerala, India. Publication Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30237672
Eminent Biosciences(EMBS) and Dept of Genetics, Osmania University, Hyderabad Publication Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25248957
EMBS publication In association with Institute of Genetics and Hospital for Genetic Diseases, Osmania University, Hyderabad Publication Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26229292
Sincerely,
Dr. Anuraj Nayarisseri
Principal Scientist & Director,
Eminent Biosciences.
Mob :+91 97522 95342