Discover the world's scientific knowledge

Polymath or Generalist learning is when the individual has knowledge of multiple fields, in contrast with Mastery or Specialist learning which consists on being able to domain a single field of knowledge.

The idea behind the questions argues that in modern day with the fast development of technology, the need for specalists will progressively decrease causing the current teaching philosophy in higher education, to teach a single career for the student to excel in a determined field, to become obsolete and unsustainable. Instead, a polymath learning approach would encourage diversity in the students skills allowing for it to innovate various fields of knowledge and being able to participate in more than a single specialised career.

Thank you vary much for you contributions.

Many teacher are faced with the challenge to quickly transition an in-person class to online delivery for the rest of this semester.

Based on my research and experience, I prepared this podcast for my school today, with advice for teachers as they make decisions about how to restructure their classes. While it is geared mostly to my campus you may be interested in the ideas about evaluating and making use of the different learning tools that are available.

I think that it is important to remember to ground our redesign in theory, even though we need to do it quickly.

I am interested in your feedback and other thoughts (and you will be able to hear my voice).

STEM: Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics

Scholars are in agreement that the leadership role of the principal is critical in the implementation of ICT for teaching and learning. However, teachers seems to be reluctant in using ICTs to enhance professional curriculum practice.

In the US at least - we are somewhat hampered by policy related mandates on what should be taught and how it should be taught and assessed. This inhibits the integration of technology for many of the high impact practices that theory would lead us to believe will make a large difference in student learning. What changes do you think need to be put in place to change the current architecture in such a way to afford better technology-mediated/integrated learning? I would love to hear not just about changes to US policy - but also policies that other countries have put in place that are making a difference with respect to the use of technology in the classroom.

Interactive Radio Instruction (IRI) involves the use of radio to bring curriculum and teacher training to classrooms in some of the most underserved areas globally. It is a cost-effective and widely available medium that has helped rebuild and revitalize education programs in some of the least developed countries

IRI episodes guide learners through the learning process by means of a progression of activities related to measurable learning objectives.

Interactive Radio Instruction (IRI) is encompased under the more general term Interactive Audio Instruction (IAI), as evolving technology has allowed different forms of delivering these audio programs including CD players and MP3 players.

I would like to incorporate researcher opinion into my comparison of validated instruments to measure motivation of students in higher education.

Ex. Contructivist 5E's vs. Inquiry method

Collaborative Learning vs. Direct Instruction

Hello,

I'm bored with these kind of e-mails that invites you in congress, like below (from e. g. hpblb3@si, 2018icpc@vegoolee.comna.com, iches3@spenbarper.com...).

I'm not sure that those who send this kind of stuff have checked previously my research field...

Have a look:

The 3rd Int'l Conference on Hydraulic Engineering and Safety (ICHES 2018) will be held during May 29-31, 2018 in Chengdu, China. You are invited to submit papers or abstracts to our conference through paper submission system. All the accepted papers will be published by "World Journal of Engineering and Technology" (ISSN:2331-4222). Conference Website: www.engii.org/conference/ICHES2018/ Paper Submission Due: Jan. 25, 2018 Invited Speakers If you wish to serve the conference as an invited speaker, please send email to us with your CV for evaluation. As an Invited Speaker, you will enjoy a free registration. Prof. Jueyi Sui, Science and Management Dr. Jin Su Jeong, Technical University of Madrid, Spain Dr. Ching-Tai Ng, The University of Adelaide, Australia Prof. José Luís Barroso de Aguiar, Departamento de Engenharia Civil，Portuguese Prof. Chih-Ta Tsai, National Cheng Kung University, China Prof. Kheir Al-Kodmany, University of Illinois at Chicago, USA Prof. Hua Yang, Chinese People's Armed Police Forces Academy, China Prof. Carol Anne Mutch, University of Auckland Standard Prof. Magiswary d/o Dorasamy, Multimedia University, India Prof. HAGE CHEHADE Fadi, Lebanese University, France Prof. Mu-Song Chen, Department of Electrical Engineering of Da-Yeh UniversityChanghua, China Dr. Padmavathi Ganapathi, Department of Computer Science, Avinashilingam Institute of Home Science and Higher Education for Women, India Contact Us Email: eng_sep@engii.org Tel: 86 156 2908 5792 WeChat: Engii_vivian

Another one (quite funny):

2018-5-30】第三届智能与交互式系统及应用国际会议

地点：香港

时间：2018年6月29-30日

出版社：斯普林格

检索类型：EI/ISTP双检索

往届检索：IISA2016 & IISA2017所有文章全部被EI检索

会议官网：www . iisa2018 . org/（请删除空格键点击查看更多详情）

联系电话：153 8711 8351（IISA会务组）

座机电话：027-87153536（周一至周五,8:30-12:30;12:30-18:00）

咨询QQ: 3357066350 （及时为您解答各种疑问）

投稿邮箱: iisa2018 @ 163 . com(先投稿先审稿先录用）

注意事项：

1.本次会议只接受英文全文投稿

2.所投论文需在国内外未曾公开发表过

3.所投文章符合议题方向且内容完善

4.每篇论文的作者需要有一位出席会议，并进行口头或海报的陈述（若有特殊情况不能参会者，需提前告知）

5.截稿时间：2018年5月30日

友情提示：需要评职称或者毕业的作者以及您身边有需要的同事，学生，同学，朋友，请把握这次论文发表的机会！

Please do you have a translator?

I don't understand something; as you are invited everywhere all the time as chaiman/speaker, where do you find (free) time for your research?

Science curricula is still largely being implemented in the traditional 'chalk and talk' way. The actual curricula focuses on inquiry-based strategies which, therefore, is what is taught in teachers' college science education curricula. Lip service has been given to integrating science with technology. A more relevant science curriculum could theoretically be implemented by integrating science with not only technology, but other subject areas such as mathematics, social studies and engineering.