Discover the world's scientific knowledge
With 135+ million publication pages, 20+ million researchers and 1+ million questions, this is where everyone can access science
You can use AND, OR, NOT, "" and () to specify your search.
Question
- Nov 2012
I need some information about smart solutions that help healthcare organizations for:
Improving quality of care
Reducing the cost of services
Providing secure & compliant solutions
…
Question
- May 2016
I've located older versions of the articles by Cameron, K., and Freeman, S., but I've not located the actual instrument.
…
Question
- Sep 2015
We need a relation of AAPP to ask if innovation practices are being developed.
…
Question
- Aug 2015
its obvious that nurse educators and instructors working abroad undergo a lot of stress at workplace and struggle to cope up. are there any studies done to assess the resilience among nurse educators ?
…
Question
- Apr 2013
When I think of gay and lesbian marriages my heart jumps from its position.It is life but weird.
When I think of gay couples adopting children my tears come out. It dreadful for the children. The children may neither be gay nor lesbian. There is no democracy. It is a contradiction on children safety laws. Children are just minors sacrificed for the weird life of adults. Society needs to rethink.
The benefits of gay and lesbian marriages must be limited to those adults in love. The children here never consented to this love, union or institution.
There is no family created by this marriage. Everything is artificial to say the least. If the union fails to produce children why comfort it, benefit, propagate it, vindicate it or democratize it and legitimize it.
Being gay or lesbian is natural but unique, rare and abnormal to the commonly expected and legitimately - legal known human world over principles of relating and loving for marriage purposes. The condition indicates a shortcoming, a disorder and an abnormality that is real but natural.
Legalizing the marriage could be acceptable to certain societies but should not be projected as a democratic principle because cultural acceptance defer with contents, regions or countries. Europe Acceptance of gay marriages should not be forced on other people under to pretext of democracy. Being gay or lesbian is never a political philosophy or political but generally a biological disorder that societies need to tolerate but not to campaign for.
Sacrificing children is again a blunder the western systems wanted to portray as good after seemingly moral and cultural decay in their societies. From the beginning the union of the same sex individual is doomed of reproducing. If the union is done to satisfy other tensions besides producing children then why support the adoption of normal children by an abnormal couple. What will happen to the children adopted when they mature and discover themselves in a family institution which they do not accept. Does it mean that the same children must be defended legally so that they can criminalize the current leadership who are supporting their adoption into an informal and abnormal union.
I think the purpose of same sex marriage is not to bring children in the union. The seemingly normal and democratic persons are unilaterally distortion the life of other human being despite the fact that they are minors. Let us rethink our positions about gays adopting children.
The gays and lesbians are not cripples who are failing to have children. Their condition is God determined and they like relationship with someone like them. The children now adopted are born out of a man and wife and it is also God determined. Let us not be crooks and systematic murders by sacrificing non consenting souls to a marriage of convenience and abnormality. The people supporting adoption of children by gay and lesbian couples are criminals and unGodly to the extent that they are crucifying the children at Gologotha.
All most everyone like what could be classified as normal life, normal family. But to these children we are not giving them normal life. The people supporting this misdemeanor are pretender, crooks and they are politicking to the extreme with the lives of children.
The gay and lesbians are not the majority and can not start a culture because they will become extinct as a result of the incapacity of their marriage institution to reproduce. The existence of gays and lesbians in dependent on the normal marriage of man and woman. It is this reasoning that makes it rational to allow the normal -God accepted (in the bible -it is written-- God created a woman for adam. God created all animals male and female.........God said go and multiple).
Who are these persons who are support the otherwise. Why do they want to sacrifice other people's children? Does it mean that if you do not have a known or available mother and father you can be abused like what we are now trying to do? Can these politicians and the so called democrats accept it if their children are taken away and given to gay couples? Is it a fantasy of political dreams? Do we have sympathy?
I think we have people who are fade up with helping or persons who are just cruel who would want to take unjustified methods to deal with the poor, impoverished, and especially children. But why is wrong with the same sex couples live a life of there on. They want to have a soul outside their life. Having a family outside your life. Just imagine the couples kissing or caressing when these normal children are 7-10 years. Is this world now happy to support unnatural things as we are always screening the films about vampires.
Africa must think twice about this democracy. Someone once acknowledge too much democracy is mobcracy and it is not functional for everyone. The western cultures, behaviours and likes are not democratic ethics. Also the world must guard against western intimidation and lies that are systematic and filthy.
The idea of handing up defenseless children to gay couples is filthy and as polluted as raw sewerage.
Let us accept lesbian and gay marriage but let us fight against children being abused by systems and same sex institutions.
(WILL BE CONTINUED- NOT REVISED- I am crying. Society is deceptive and socially and mentally raping the children.)
LiWhen I think of gay and lesbian marriages my heart jumps from its position.It is life but weird.
When I think of gay couples adopting children my tears come out. It dreadful for the children. The children may neither be gay nor lesbian. There is no democracy. It is a contradiction on children safety laws. Children are just minors sacrificed for the weird life of adults. Society needs to rethink.
The benefits of gay and lesbian marriages must be limited to those adults in love. The children here never consented to this love, union or institution.
There is no family created by this marriage. Everything is artificial to say the least. If the union fails to produce children why comfort it, benefit, propagate it, vindicate it or democratize it and legitimize it.
Being gay or lesbian is natural but unique, rare and abnormal to the commonly expected and legitimately - legal known human world over principles of relating and loving for marriage purposes. The condition indicates a shortcoming, a disorder and an abnormality that is real but natural.
Legalizing the marriage could be acceptable to certain societies but should not be projected as a democratic principle because cultural acceptance defer with contents, regions or countries. Europe Acceptance of gay marriages should not be forced on other people under to pretext of democracy. Being gay or lesbian is never a political philosophy or political but generally a biological disorder that societies need to tolerate but not to campaign for.
Sacrificing children is again a blunder the western systems wanted to portray as good after seemingly moral and cultural decay in their societies. From the beginning the union of the same sex individual is doomed of reproducing. If the union is done to satisfy other tensions besides producing children then why support the adoption of normal children by an abnormal couple. What will happen to the children adopted when they mature and discover themselves in a family institution which they do not accept. Does it mean that the same children must be defended legally so that they can criminalize the current leadership who are supporting their adoption into an informal and abnormal union.
I think the purpose of same sex marriage is not to bring children in the union. The seemingly normal and democratic persons are unilaterally distortion the life of other human being despite the fact that they are minors. Let us rethink our positions about gays adopting children.
The gays and lesbians are not cripples who are failing to have children. Their condition is God determined and they like relationship with someone like them. The children now adopted are born out of a man and wife and it is also God determined. Let us not be crooks and systematic murders by sacrificing non consenting souls to a marriage of convenience and abnormality. The people supporting adoption of children by gay and lesbian couples are criminals and unGodly to the extent that they are crucifying the children at Gologotha.
All most everyone like what could be classified as normal life, normal family. But to these children we are not giving them normal life. The people supporting this misdemeanor are pretender, crooks and they are politicking to the extreme with the lives of children.
The gay and lesbians are not the majority and can not start a culture because they will become extinct as a result of the incapacity of their marriage institution to reproduce. The existence of gays and lesbians in dependent on the normal marriage of man and woman. It is this reasoning that makes it rational to allow the normal -God accepted (in the bible -it is written-- God created a woman for adam. God created all animals male and female.........God said go and multiple).
Who are these persons who are support the otherwise. Why do they want to sacrifice other people's children? Does it mean that if you do not have a known or available mother and father you can be abused like what we are now trying to do? Can these politicians and the so called democrats accept it if their children are taken away and given to gay couples? Is it a fantasy of political dreams? Do we have sympathy?
I think we have people who are fade up with helping or persons who are just cruel who would want to take unjustified methods to deal with the poor, impoverished, and especially children. But why is wrong with the same sex couples live a life of there on. They want to have a soul outside their life. Having a family outside your life. Just imagine the couples kissing or caressing when these normal children are 7-10 years. Is this world now happy to support unnatural things as we are always screening the films about vampires.
Africa must think twice about this democracy. Someone once acknowledge too much democracy is mobcracy and it is not functional for everyone. The western cultures, behaviours and likes are not democratic ethics. Also the world must guard against western intimidation and lies that are systematic and filthy.
The idea of handing up defenseless children to gay couples is filthy and as polluted as raw sewerage.
Let us accept lesbian and gay marriage but let us fight against children being abused by systems and same sex institutions.
It seems the dead were genius and intellectual than the dead. The aspect of gay marriage seems to be useless for a debate because even if societies agrees with the concept or philosophy there is no benefit to it currently or in the future. It is a dead end kind of debate. It is a debate of people or societies that gone burst - societies whose morals have been seriously contaminated and now filthy like raw sewerage. This is never a principle. It is not democracy at all. If people call it democracy -yes! it is negative democracy. A democracy for a people who are going berserk or insane. It is extreme. We need to protect other culture form this contamination. A contamination that requires quarantining.
Yes man to man love! It sounds unique but very empty. I mean empty of purpose and future. A life that is typically meant to satisfy a biologically defective system. A system that has no products and now a weird world of uncertainties concur to give the couple children whose biology is correct. I mean if the world is a democracy- it could identify biologically defective children and give to such a couple. This will avoid a disgrace to the adopted children.
The question still stands - 'WHY ARE WE SUPPORTING THIS INVASION OF SOCIETY BY GAYS AND LESBIANS?" What is the future for those who are not? Why are we not giving the mad/insane republics of their own? Are we not oppressive to the insane? This is because we are judging them from are standard. Anyone who does not fit into this standard is categorized as mad. But there is not mad person because people just differ in their degrees of intelligence. Those who qualify to be normal just have their degrees of intelligence closely related. Now they frame laws for others. This is exactly the dictatorship of the majority against the minority. I hope societies initiated laws to avoid extremes. This is why societies accept certain behaviours and reject others. The is exactly the point why for ages society had reject the idea of gays and lesbians and many are still opposing the the gay marriage. It is fruitless and future less.
If we select any inhabited land and maroon a mad woman and man there it is possible that in future they can have children who could be mentally stable. They have a future. It is even supported by the Bible. It is a union of two people- a woman and a man. The attraction is real. Marriage or sex life becomes normal or legitimate.
If you maroon the gays or lesbians in the same uninhabited land they will fruitless and futureless. It is a union of the same person. It is not normal. It is an abnormality that needs control. We are subverting the world in the name of democracy.
Certain continents need to reject, fight, prevent speak out against infiltration and pollution from western cultural systems. Cultural systems that are a threat to normal life.
We are becoming empty. Empty of progressive life. Lets Africa have time to reconsider this new philosophy. A philosophy marring two man. It is weird to the normal mind but interesting and democratic to those who support mystery. I hope normal children will never be adopted by an abnormal couple
(WILL BE CONTINUED- NOT REVISED- I am crying. Society is deceptive and socially and mentally raping the children.)
…
Question
- Mar 2014
Labor diversity in education, experience, and skills may be beneficial to the organization due to better decision making, improved problem solving, and better knowledge about foreign markets.
At the same time, ineffective communication and lower social ties may negatively affect organizational performance.
…
Question
- Sep 2016
I am doing a research on this topic. In particular I'll study how the single players of the cluster could collaborate to save environment and share materials, resource ecc between them. In my opinion is very interesting to analyze the single business model of the companies but in the same time how to manage the cluster and the interactions inside. Any idea?
…
Question
- Mar 2017
For developing countries
…
Question
- Jul 2015
I am interested to know more on studies and ideas on challenges for Competency based HRM practices ( recruitment, training, assessment ….) in project-based organization ( success, perfomance,..)
…