Discover the world's scientific knowledge
With 160+ million publication pages, 25+ million researchers and 1+ million questions, this is where everyone can access science
You can use AND, OR, NOT, "" and () to specify your search.
Question
- Sep 2024
I,m researching on The role of artificial intelligence in the field of banking law.Any researcher who has ideas or article in this field can help me.
…
Question
- Apr 2022
While the regulation of artificial intelligence (AI) is still at its infancy in the EU and the US, it is already becoming apparent that there are different approaches among countries on how to regulate AI. Does this mean that an international agreement will become necessary later on? What are the pros and cons of such an international regulatory approach?
…
Question
- May 2023
Everyone should watch this groundbreaking hearing on AI oversight...
...think hard, and voice your ideas (and crucially the reasons for those ideas).
So, what are your thoughts?
…
Question
- Jul 2023
The development of AI-powered autonomous weapons raises ethical concerns, such as loss of human control, potential misuse, and adherence to international humanitarian law.
…
Question
- Mar 2023
The use of AI in judicial systems is being explored by judiciaries, prosecution services and other domain specific judicial bodies around the world. What are various horizons in judicial system where AI can contribute.
…
Question
- Nov 2023
AI-induced murder and manslaughter are possibilities that are foreseeable in the not far future from now. How can international communities especially the common law countries going to handle such crimes and are there enough provisions within the various countries' legal framework to tackle such issues head on? Countries such as Ghana, India and US and UK have unique criminal law systems. Are these criminal law systems even within the common law framework depart significantly from each other in dealing with such AI-induced crimes? Or they will be treated similarly based on the common law principles that has widely been accepted among these countries?
…
Question
- May 2023
How to bring AI and electromagnetic in Law Court ?
Many things are invisible :-)
…
Question
- Feb 2024
Kindly research on how AI is going to impact on legal sevices and in particular arbitraration.Right now some firms have started using AI for research,due diligence and data analytics.
…
Question
- Sep 2020
After considerable research, I have found several use cases which can be used to exemplify some implementations of AI on law firms. However, there is clearly a disadvantage for this segment when compared to medium or large law firms.
Now for the question, are there key components that we can identify in law firms that have succesfully adopted AI? If so, can these be directly implemented on small firms or are we to find a specific set of methodologies for this group?
…
Question
- Jan 2025
Recently, I was using Visual Studio Copilot while learning from Corey Schafer’s videos, and I noticed something concerning. The autocomplete suggestions were identical to the tutorial—down to every variable name and value. Yet, Copilot doesn’t credit Corey, who invested time, money, and effort into creating those videos. What’s worse is that the AI is essentially using his hard work for free and could even profit from it by charging me a monthly subscription fee later!
This issue reminded me of a broader problem I came across recently—AI training data being scraped from platforms like LibGen and Sci-Hub. Not only does this violate copyright laws, but it also completely disregards crediting the original creators. It’s troubling to think that their work is being used, repackaged, and sold without them receiving any recognition or benefits.
If you’re a well-known researcher in your field, chances are your work is being used freely by these models. Ironically, AI systems trained on such data could eventually replace the very people who contributed to this knowledge base—especially in fields like programming.
Copyright laws and patenting have long been drivers of innovation. They gave creators and researchers the motivation to invest their time and resources, knowing they’d be rewarded. But now, major corporations are mining vast amounts of information from the internet without giving anything back to society. In the near future, what incentive will a scientist or creator have to innovate when they know an advanced AI model might freely use their work, improve upon it, and profit without sharing the rewards?
For example, when I watch Corey Schafer’s videos on YouTube, he earns a small amount of money. I can also recommend his content to friends, bringing him more viewers and, in turn, more revenue. This gives Corey motivation to create more high-quality content. However, if an AI uses even a single piece of his information, it should also compensate him—just like YouTube does. Otherwise, this system will eventually demotivate creators, scientists, and the entire tech community, leading to a collapse of innovation.
What are your thoughts on this?
…
© 2008-2025 ResearchGate GmbH. All rights reserved.