Zilla Roose’s research while affiliated with University of Lucerne and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (1)


Figure 1. Researchers' motivations for involving practitioners in the research project (percentages of researchers selecting different motives; n ¼ 67 researchers responded; more than one option could be selected). Source: Balthasar et al. (2018).
Figure 2. Practitioners' motivations for participating in the research project (percentages of practitioners selecting different motives; n ¼ 36 practitioners responded; more than one option could be selected). Source: Balthasar et al. (2018).
Figure 3. Percentage of researchers and practitioners who have perceived different forms of collaboration (n ¼ 66 researchers, n ¼ 36 practitioners, multiple answers possible; Percentages of n ¼ 36; more than one option could be selected). *p < 0.05; þ non-significant tendency with p < 0.1 (Chi-square tests); Source: Balthasar et al. (2018).
Figure 4. Ratings of the frequency of the contact between researchers and practitioners in the phases of (1) the definition of the research questions, (2) the scientific working phase aiming to answer the research questions and the (3) the communication of the findings. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001 (Mann-Whitney U-tests); Source: Balthasar et al. (2018).
Figure 5. Significant aspects related to the usefulness of the research project for practitioners according to the analysis of the responses of researchers and practitioners (* p < 0.05, **p <.0.01).

+1

Increasing the relevance of science for practice and practice for science: Quantitative empirical insights
  • Article
  • Full-text available

December 2020

·

141 Reads

·

10 Citations

Science and Public Policy

·

·

·

[...]

·

Zilla Roose

We present results of a survey conducted with researchers and practitioners involved in a Swiss National Research Programme on steering energy consumption. We analyse what motivates practitioners and researchers to engage in a collaborative research project, their perception of the collaboration intensity in different project phases, and the extent to which the research project provided useful results for practitioners. Our analyses demonstrate that the intensity of collaboration is a key driver of successful collaboration as it fosters trust between researchers and practitioners. Thereby, it increases the usefulness of the research project for practitioners and their perceived contribution to the success of the research project. Research programmes should thus (1) foster trust through incentivising collaboration between research and practice; (2) facilitate the development of a shared understanding of researchers’ and practitioners’ respective roles; and (3) support the inclusion of practitioners in the project development phase through financial support during the proposal-writing phase.

Download

Citations (1)


... While there are studies on research-practice partnerships investigating, for example, motives for engaging in practice-based research (Fritz et al, 2019) and perceived success factors (Binder et al, 2020), few have attempted to define what a highquality outcome of such a process is or, in other words, what constitutes excellence in practice-based health research. One exception is a paper by Glasgow et al (2012) that describes five 'aspired tenets' of dissemination and implementation research that reflect the tension in practice-based research: rigour and relevance, efficiency and speed, collaboration, improved capacity and cumulative knowledge. ...

Reference:

When academic impact is not enough: a concept mapping study characterising excellence in practice-based research
Increasing the relevance of science for practice and practice for science: Quantitative empirical insights

Science and Public Policy