Zhenlan Yao’s research while affiliated with University of California, Los Angeles and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (5)


Interaction of chikungunya virus glycoproteins with macrophage factors controls virion production
  • Article

September 2024

·

14 Reads

·

1 Citation

The EMBO Journal

Zhenlan Yao

·

Sangeetha Ramachandran

·

Serina Huang

·

[...]

·

Melody MH Li

Despite their role as innate sentinels, macrophages can serve as cellular reservoirs of chikungunya virus (CHIKV), a highly-pathogenic arthropod-borne alphavirus that has caused large outbreaks among human populations. Here, with the use of viral chimeras and evolutionary selection analysis, we define CHIKV glycoproteins E1 and E2 as critical for virion production in THP-1 derived human macrophages. Through proteomic analysis and functional validation, we further identify signal peptidase complex subunit 3 (SPCS3) and eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit K (eIF3k) as E1-binding host proteins with anti-CHIKV activities. We find that E1 residue V220, which has undergone positive selection, is indispensable for CHIKV production in macrophages, as its mutation attenuates E1 interaction with the host restriction factors SPCS3 and eIF3k. Finally, we show that the antiviral activity of eIF3k is translation-independent, and that CHIKV infection promotes eIF3k translocation from the nucleus to the cytoplasm, where it associates with SPCS3. These functions of CHIKV glycoproteins late in the viral life cycle provide a new example of an intracellular evolutionary arms race with host restriction factors, as well as potential targets for therapeutic intervention.


Chikungunya virus glycoproteins transform macrophages into productive viral dissemination vessels
  • Preprint
  • File available

May 2023

·

38 Reads

·

1 Citation

Despite their role as innate sentinels, macrophages are cellular reservoirs for chikungunya virus (CHIKV), a highly pathogenic arthropod-borne alphavirus that has caused unprecedented epidemics worldwide. Here, we took interdisciplinary approaches to elucidate the CHIKV determinants that subvert macrophages into virion dissemination vessels. Through comparative infection using chimeric alphaviruses and evolutionary selection analyses, we discovered for the first time that CHIKV glycoproteins E2 and E1 coordinate efficient virion production in macrophages with the domains involved under positive selection. We performed proteomics on CHIKV-infected macrophages to identify cellular proteins interacting with the precursor and/or mature forms of viral glycoproteins. We uncovered two E1-binding proteins, signal peptidase complex subunit 3 (SPCS3) and eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 (eIF3k), with novel inhibitory activities against CHIKV production. These results highlight how CHIKV E2 and E1 have been evolutionarily selected for viral dissemination likely through counteracting host restriction factors, making them attractive targets for therapeutic intervention.

Download

Alphavirus replication shows differential sensitivity to endogenous ZAP in 293T cells. (A,C) ZAP KO and WT 293T cells untreated (A) or treated with 5 U/mL IFN-β for 24 h (C) were infected with GFP-expressing RRV, SINV, ONNV, or CHIKV vaccine strain 181/clone 25 (MOI = 1 PFU/cell). Cells were harvested and fixed at 24 h post-infection (h.p.i.), and their percentage of infection was determined by flow cytometry. Data are combined from three independent experiments performed with biological replicates in triplicate wells. Error bars represent the standard deviations (SD). Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences (unpaired T test with Holm–Šídák’s multiple comparisons test: ***, p < 0.001; ****, p < 0.0001). (B,D) Fold inhibition of alphavirus replication by ZAP. Data from panels A (B) or C (D) are represented. Fold inhibition relative to ZAP KO was calculated by dividing the percentage of infection of each virus in ZAP KO 293T cells by the percentage of infection in WT 293T cells. Error bars represent the standard deviations (SD). Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences (one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparisons test: ***, p < 0.001; ****, p < 0.0001).
Alphavirus production shows differential sensitivity to IFN-induced endogenous ZAP in 293T cells. Following treatment with 5 U/mL IFN-β for 24 h, ZAP KO and WT 293T were infected with RRV (A), SINV (B), ONNV (C), and the CHIKV vaccine strain (181/clone 25) (D) at MOI = 0.1 PFU/cell. Media overlaying the cells were harvested at 0, 8, 24, and 48 h.p.i., and the viral titer was determined by infection of BHK-21 cells in standard plaque assays. Mean values from four biological replicates across two independent experiments are plotted, and error bars represent the SD. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences (two-way ANOVA and Bonferroni posttest: **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001; ****, p < 0.0001).
ZAPS and ZAPL binding to alphavirus genomic RNA do not correlate with alphavirus replication sensitivity to ZAP. (A,C) Lysates of ZAP KO 293T cells with induced expression of RFP-ZAPS (A) or RFP-ZAPL (C) were incubated with biotinylated Fluc RNA or gRNA of RRV, SINV, ONNV, or CHIKV. Following streptavidin-mediated pull-down of biotinylated RNA, ZAP associated with each RNA and in whole cell lysate (input) was assayed by immunoblot (IB). Expected sizes: RFP-ZAPS = 106 kDa, RFP-ZAPL = 130 kDa. Data are representative of results from three independent experiments. (B,D) ImageJ quantifications of panel A (B) or C (D). Data are combined from three independent experiments. Error bars represent the SD. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences (one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparisons test: *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ****, p < 0.0001).
The alphavirus nsP gene region contains the ZAP sensitivity determinant. (A) Schematics of chimeric viruses generated. The GFP construct is the same across all viruses. (B) ZAP KO 293T cells with doxycycline-inducible expression of ZAPS or ZAPL were infected with GFP-expressing SINV, ONNV, or ONNV nsP/SINV sP chimeric virus at MOI = 0.1 PFU/cell for 18 h before their percentage of infection was determined by flow cytometry. Fold inhibition by ZAP relative to doxycycline-untreated (-dox) cells is shown here. Error bars represent the SD. Data representative of two independent experiments performed with biological replicates in triplicate wells. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences (two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparisons test: **, p < 0.01; ****, p < 0.0001). ns—not significant.
ZAPS and ZAPL binding to alphavirus nsP RNA do not correlate with alphavirus replication sensitivity to ZAP. (A,C) Lysates of ZAP KO 293T cells with induced expression of RFP-ZAPS (A) or RFP-ZAPL (C) were incubated with biotinylated Fluc RNA or nsP RNA of RRV, SINV, ONNV, or CHIKV. Following streptavidin-mediated pull-down of biotinylated RNA, ZAP associated with each RNA and in whole cell lysate (input) was assayed by immunoblot. Expected sizes: RFP-ZAPS = 106 kDa, RFP-ZAPL = 130 kDa. Data are representative of results from three independent experiments. (B,D) ImageJ quantifications of panel A (B) or C (D). Data are combined from three independent experiments. Error bars represent the SD. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences (one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparisons test: *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01).

+3

Alphavirus Evasion of Zinc Finger Antiviral Protein (ZAP) Correlates with CpG Suppression in a Specific Viral nsP2 Gene Sequence

March 2023

·

70 Reads

·

12 Citations

Certain re-emerging alphaviruses, such as chikungunya virus (CHIKV), cause serious disease and widespread epidemics. To develop virus-specific therapies, it is critical to understand the determinants of alphavirus pathogenesis and virulence. One major determinant is viral evasion of the host interferon response, which upregulates antiviral effectors, including zinc finger antiviral protein (ZAP). Here, we demonstrated that Old World alphaviruses show differential sensitivity to endogenous ZAP in 293T cells: Ross River virus (RRV) and Sindbis virus (SINV) are more sensitive to ZAP than o’nyong’nyong virus (ONNV) and CHIKV. We hypothesized that the more ZAP-resistant alphaviruses evade ZAP binding to their RNA. However, we did not find a correlation between ZAP sensitivity and binding to alphavirus genomic RNA. Using a chimeric virus, we found the ZAP sensitivity determinant lies mainly within the alphavirus non-structural protein (nsP) gene region. Surprisingly, we also did not find a correlation between alphavirus ZAP sensitivity and binding to nsP RNA, suggesting ZAP targeting of specific regions in the nsP RNA. Since ZAP can preferentially bind CpG dinucleotides in viral RNA, we identified three 500-bp sequences in the nsP region where CpG content correlates with ZAP sensitivity. Interestingly, ZAP binding to one of these sequences in the nsP2 gene correlated to sensitivity, and we confirmed that this binding is CpG-dependent. Our results demonstrate a potential strategy of alphavirus virulence by localized CpG suppression to evade ZAP recognition.


Figure 2. The iBMECs recapitulate in vivo neuroinvasiveness of alphavirus (A and B) Fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) profiles and quantification of (A) iBMECs and (B) HUVECs after infection with alphaviruses. Cells were collected for flow cytometry 24 h post infection (hpi). Multiplicity of infection (MOI) = 3. (C) FACS profile and quantification of iBMECs after infection with SVN mutants. Cells were collected at 24 hpi. MOI = 3. (D) Virus titer of supernatants collected from iBMECs infected with alphaviruses. Supernatants were collected 24 hpi for titration quantified as plaque-forming units (PFU). MOI = 3.. Values are shown as mean ± SD from two independent infection experiments.
Figure 3. Differential infection of the iBMECs by neurotropic versus non-neurotropic flaviviruses
Figure 5. The iBMECs intrinsically express IFITM1, which restricts DENV but not ZIKV infection (A) Representative images of mixed culture of H9-iBMECs and Vero cells challenged with DENV-2. Mixed cells were cultured in the same well and fixed at 48 hpi. MOI = 1. Areas of either only Vero cells (top) or a mixed population (bottom) on the same slide are shown. Scale bars, 100 μm. (B) mRNA expression levels of IFITM1, IFITM2, and IFITM3. Values are shown as mean ± SD from three biological replicates. (C) Western blot analysis of DENV-2 and ZIKV infection in H9-iBMECs with or without IFITM1 KO . Cell lysates were collected at 48 hpi. MOI = 1. (D and E) Analysis of DENV-2 and ZIKV PR infection in SNB-19 cells that ectopically express IFITM1. Results shown are (D) infection rates and (E) NS1 expression. SNB-19
Figure 6. Primary human SerCs and RMECs constitutively express IFITM proteins and are selectively resistant to DENV infection (A) mRNA expression of IFITMs. (B and C) Western blot analysis of protein expression of IFITMs in (B) BTB and (C) BRB cells. (D) Infection of the three types of barrier cells by DENV-2 and ZIKV PR . Cells were infected at MOI = 1 and collected 48 hpi for staining. Scale bars, 100 μm. (E and F) Viral production by (E) SerCs and (F) RMECs in comparison with Huh7.5 cells. Supernatants were collected 48 hpi. MOI = 1. Virus titers were quantified as FFUs. A two-way ANOVA was performed. (G and H) Flow cytometry analysis of DENV-2 infection of (G) SerCs and (H) RMECs cocultured with Huh7.5-GFP cells. SerCs or RMECs were mixed with GFP-tagged Huh7.5
Intrinsic antiviral immunity of barrier cells revealed by an iPSC-derived blood-brain barrier cellular model

May 2022

·

234 Reads

·

16 Citations

Cell Reports

Physiological blood-tissue barriers play a critical role in separating the circulation from immune-privileged sites and denying access to blood-borne viruses. The mechanism of virus restriction by these barriers is poorly understood. We utilize induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived human brain microvascular endothelial cells (iBMECs) to study virus-blood-brain barrier (BBB) interactions. These iPSC-derived cells faithfully recapitulate a striking difference in in vivo neuroinvasion by two alphavirus isolates and are selectively permissive to neurotropic flaviviruses. A model of cocultured iBMECs and astrocytes exhibits high transendothelial electrical resistance and blocks non-neurotropic flaviviruses from getting across the barrier. We find that iBMECs constitutively express an interferon-induced gene, IFITM1, which preferentially restricts the replication of non-neurotropic flaviviruses. Barrier cells from blood-testis and blood-retinal barriers also constitutively express IFITMs that contribute to the viral resistance. Our application of a renewable human iPSC-based model for studying virus-BBB interactions reveals that intrinsic immunity at the barriers contributes to virus exclusion.


A CRISPR Activation Screen Identifies an Atypical Rho GTPase That Enhances Zika Viral Entry

October 2021

·

253 Reads

·

16 Citations

Zika virus (ZIKV) is a re-emerging flavivirus that has caused large-scale epidemics. Infection during pregnancy can lead to neurologic developmental abnormalities in children. There is no approved vaccine or therapy for ZIKV. To uncover cellular pathways required for ZIKV that can be therapeutically targeted, we transcriptionally upregulated all known human coding genes with an engineered CRISPR–Cas9 activation complex in human fibroblasts deficient in interferon (IFN) signaling. We identified Ras homolog family member V (RhoV) and WW domain-containing transcription regulator 1 (WWTR1) as proviral factors, and found them to play important roles during early ZIKV infection in A549 cells. We then focused on RhoV, a Rho GTPase with atypical terminal sequences and membrane association, and validated its proviral effects on ZIKV infection and virion production in SNB-19 cells. We found that RhoV promotes infection of some flaviviruses and acts at the step of viral entry. Furthermore, RhoV proviral effects depend on the complete GTPase cycle. By depleting Rho GTPases and related proteins, we identified RhoB and Pak1 as additional proviral factors. Taken together, these results highlight the positive role of RhoV in ZIKV infection and confirm CRISPR activation as a relevant method to identify novel host–pathogen interactions.

Citations (3)


... It also interacts with various cellular proteins that may act as cofactors, enhancing its antiviral effects [29]. Furthermore, ZAP can augment other antiviral systems [30,31]. Recent studies, including our own, have demonstrated that flaviviruses such as Zika virus, JEV, and WNV are susceptible to ZAP antiviral effects in VERO cells [30,32,33]. ...

Reference:

Infectious Subgenomic Amplicon Strategies for Japanese Encephalitis and West Nile Viruses
Alphavirus Evasion of Zinc Finger Antiviral Protein (ZAP) Correlates with CpG Suppression in a Specific Viral nsP2 Gene Sequence

... It is known that endothelial cells produce a robust type-I interferon (IFN-I) response, expressing a high level of interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs) at a basal level, and with strong induction after infection [37,38]. Indeed, based on our previous co-localization analysis of CHIKV infection in vivo, we have seen an increase in the amount of actively replicating CHIKV-IOL colocalizing with cardiac endothelial cells in hearts from type-I IFN receptor deficient mice as compared to WT C57BL/6J mice [16]. ...

Intrinsic antiviral immunity of barrier cells revealed by an iPSC-derived blood-brain barrier cellular model

Cell Reports

... These groups were enriched for less intuitive GO terms, including "GTPase activator activity" (Fig. 4D) and "transmembrane receptor protein tyrosine kinase activity (GO:0004714)" (Fig. 4F). Many flaviviruses, including ZIKV, enter host cells through clathrin-mediated endocytosis, a process that depends heavily on small GTPases (27) and tyrosine kinase receptors to facilitate viral entry, replication, and egress (28). Consequently, while the exact roles of groups 5 and 8 in viral response remain unclear, these findings suggest additional biological processes may contribute to ZIKV infection dynamics. ...

A CRISPR Activation Screen Identifies an Atypical Rho GTPase That Enhances Zika Viral Entry