Zhaoyu Gu’s research while affiliated with China Agricultural University and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (9)


CiNF‐YB8 and CiLDL1 interact with CiNF‐YC1/CiNF‐YA3 to form CiNF‐Y and CiNF–LDL1 complexes in C. indicum. (a) Interactions among CiNF‐Y subunits and CiLDL1 as analyzed using a yeast two‐hybrid assay. Transformed yeast cells were grown on synthetic defined medium lacking Trp and Leu (SD(−LW)) or lacking Trp, Leu, His, and Ade (SD(−LWHA)). All SD(−LWHA) medium contained BD‐YB8 were added with 100 ng ml⁻¹ aureobasidin A (AbA) to inhibit self‐activation. BD‐YC1/BD‐LSD1‐LIKE1 (LDL1) without self‐activation. Cells concentration was adjusted to OD600nm = 0.2 and were cultured with 1×, 10×, 100×, 1000×, and 10 000× dilutions. These experiments were repeated three times with similar results. AD, pGADT7; BD, pGBKT7. (b, c) Interactions among CiNF‐Y subunits and CiLDL1 was analyzed using a firefly luciferase (LUC) complementation imaging assay. nLUC‐GUS and GUS‐cLUC were used as negative controls. nLUC, N‐terminal fragment of LUC; cLUC, C‐terminal fragment of LUC; GUS, β‐Glucuronidase. (d, e) Interactions among CiLDL1 and CiNF‐Y subunits was analyzed using co‐immunoprecipitation (Co‐IP). Total proteins were extracted 3 d after infiltration of N. benthamiana leaves with the indicated constructs. The supernatant containing the soluble proteins was incubated with anti‐GFP antibodies (d) or anti‐FLAG antibodies (e) for immunoprecipitation. The precipitates were analyzed using immunoblotting with anti‐FLAG, anti‐mCherry, anti‐HA, and anti‐GFP antibodies. 35S:GFP (GFP) and 35S:HDP2‐FLAG (HDP2‐FLAG) were used as negative controls. GFP, green fluorescent protein; HA, hemagglutinin; mCherry, monomeric Cherry.
CiNF‐Y and CiNF–LDL1 heterotrimers bind to the ‘CCAAT’ box of the cin‐MIR156ab locus in C. indicum. (a) Schematic diagram of cin‐MIR156ab locus. 3′UTR, 3′ untranslated region; bp, base pair; CCAAT1, NF‐Y‐specific DNA‐binding site 1 in cin‐MIR156ab locus; Pre‐miR156a/b, precursor‐miR156a/b; TSS, transcription start site. (b, c) Chromatin immunoprecipitation quantitative PCR (ChIP‐qPCR) analysis showing the enrichment of CiNF‐YB8 (b) and CiLDL1 (c) at the Nuclear factor Y (NF)‐Y‐specific DNA‐binding site (CCAAT) of the cin‐MIR156ab promoter. Chromatin from CiNF‐YB8‐GFP, CiLDL1‐GFP, and GFP‐OX C. indicum was immunoprecipitated with anti‐GFP antibodies, and the amount of the indicated DNA was determined by qPCR. Data are means ± SD (s.d.) from three biological replicates. P‐values were calculated using a Student's t‐test. ns, no significance. (d) Domain architectures of CiNF‐YB8, CiNF‐YC1, and CiLDL1 are illustrated, with amino acid numbers indicated. Colored boxes highlight the protein boundaries utilized for structure prediction. HFD, histone‐like fold domain; SWIRM, Swi3p, Rsc8p, and Moira domain. (e, f) Structures of the CiNF‐Y/DNA and CiNF–LDL1/DNA complexes predicted by AlphaFold3. The images display cartoons and surface representations of CiNF‐Y and CiNF–LDL1 heterotrimers in complex with the cin‐MIR156ab 25‐bp CCAAT‐box oligonucleotide. Secondary structure elements of CiNF‐YA3 are labeled, with the ‘CCAAT’ nucleotides highlighted in red. The structures of CiNF‐YA3, CiNF‐YB8, CiNF‐YC1, and CiLDL1 are colored green, salmon, blue, and pink, respectively. The α1 helix of CiNF‐YA3 docks into NF‐YB8/YC1 or LSD1‐LIKE1 (LDL1)/YC1 dimers, and the α2 helix of CiNF‐YA3 binds to the DNA minor groove. All structure figures were prepared with the tool ChimeraX.
CiLDL1 competes with CiNF‐YB8 for binding to the histone fold domain of CiNF‐YC1 in C. indicum. (a) Structure of the CiNF‐YB8/CiNF‐YC1 dimer. The left panel shows the overall structure of the CiNF‐YB8/CiNF‐YC1 dimer. The right panel provides a zoomed‐in view of the detailed interaction network within the dimer. (b) Structure of the CiLDL1/CiNF‐YC1 dimer. The left panel shows the overall structure of the CiLDL1/CiNF‐YC1 dimer. The right panel provides a zoomed‐in view of the detailed interaction network within the dimer. Contacts are marked as green dashed lines. All structure figures were prepared with the tool ChimeraX. (c, d) Yeast two‐hybrid (Y2H) assays showing that the histone fold domain of CiNF‐YC1 is required for the interaction with CiNF‐YB8 or CiLDL1. Diagram of full‐length CiNF‐YC1 and its truncated derivatives used in the Y2H assay (c and d in right). Cells concentration was adjusted to OD600nm = 0.2 and were cultured with 1×, 10×, 100×, 1000×, and 10 000× dilutions. These experiments were repeated three times with similar results. Transformed yeast cells were grown on synthetic defined medium lacking Trp and Leu (SD(−LW)) or lacking Trp, Leu, His, and Ade (SD(−LWHA)) or SD(−LWHA) + AbA (100 ng/μl) medium. AD, pGADT7; BD, pGBKT7; Ct, C‐terminal; HFD, histone‐like fold domain; Nt, N‐terminal. (e, f) Firefly luciferase (LUC) complementation imaging assay showing that the presence of CiLDL1 weakens the interaction between CiNF‐YB8 and CiNF‐YC1, while CiNF‐YB8 weakens the interaction between CiLDL1 and CiNF‐YC1 in N. benthamiana leaves. Super1300‐GFP empty vector (GFP), GUS‐nLUC, and GUS‐cLUC were used as negative controls. GFP, green fluorescent protein; GUS, β‐Glucuronidase; nLUC, N‐terminal fragment of LUC; cLUC, C‐terminal fragment of LUC. (g, h) Quantification of the luminescence intensity in (e, f). P‐values were calculated using a Student's t‐test. The values are means ± SD from biological triplicates. ns, no significance. (i) Quantification of binding affinity between fluorescent CiNF‐YB8‐GFP or CiLDL1‐GFP and CiNF‐YC1 by microscale thermophoresis. Three independent thermophoresis measurements were performed. The values are means ± SD from biological triplicates. Kd, dissociation constant.
CiLDL1 and CiNF‐YB8 control cin‐MIR156ab expression to influence vegetative stage transition and flowering time in C. indicum. (a) CiNF‐YB8 gene structure and genotypes of the selected biallelic mutants. Green boxes, exons; black lines, introns; orange boxes, sgRNA target sites; bp, base pair. (b) Relative CiLDL1 expression levels in wild‐type (WT), Cinf‐yb8 mutants, Cinf‐yb8 + LDL1‐RNAi and LDL1‐RNAi C. indicum. RNAi, RNA interference. (c) Flower bud emergence time. d, day. (d) Morphology of the first seven leaves of 10‐leaf‐old plants. (e) Leaf number of the first adult leaf appearance. Juvenile leaves were defined as narrow, with no, or minimal, marginal serration. (f) Relative expression of primary transcript of cin‐MIR156ab. (g) Relative expression of cin‐miR156, with U6 used as the housekeeping gene in C. indicum. (h) Schematic diagram of the cin‐MIR156ab locus for chromatin immunoprecipitation quantitative PCR (Chip‐qPCR) in (i, j). 3′UTR, 3′ untranslated region; CCAAT1/2, Nuclear factor Y (NF‐Y)–specific DNA‐binding sites 1/2 in the cin‐MIR156ab locus; Pre‐miR156a/b, precursor‐miR156a/b; TSS, transcription start site. (i, j) ChIP‐qPCR analysis showing the enrichment of CiLDL1 at the NF‐Y‐binding sites (CCAAT1, CCAAT2) at the cin‐MIR156ab promoter by immunoprecipitation with anti‐GFP antibody in 35S:CiLDL1‐GFP in WT (CiLDL1‐GFP) and Cinf‐yb8 (Cinf‐yb8 + CiLDL‐GFP) C. indicum plants (i) or with an anti‐CiLDL1 antibody in WT and Cinf‐yb8 C. indicum plants (j). The amount of the indicated fragment was determined by qPCR. GFP, green fluorescent protein. Data in (b, f, g, i and j) are means ± SD from three biological replicates. Data in (c) are means ± SD from six biological replicates. Data in (e) are means ± SD from eight biological replicates. P‐values in (b, c, e, f, g, i, and j) were calculated using a Student's t‐test. ns, no significance.
CiLDL1 and CiNF‐YB8 influence H3K4me2 levels at the cin‐MIR156ab locus in C. indicum. (a) Chromatin immunoprecipitation quantitative PCR (ChIP‐qPCR) analysis of H3K4me2 levels at the cin‐MIR156ab locus (P0–P6 fragments) in the leaves of 20‐ to 40‐d‐old C. indicum plants (shown in Supporting Information Fig. S15a). H3, Histone H3; H3K4me2, Histone H3 Lysine 4 dimethylation. (b, c) ChIP‐qPCR analysis showing the levels of H3K4me2 at the cin‐MIR156ab locus in the leaves of 30‐d‐old CiLDL1‐GFP and CiNF‐YB8‐GFP C. indicum plants, with ubiquitin (UBI) as the housekeeping gene. Graphs are aligned with the genomic structures of the cin‐MIR156 locus. 3′UTR, 3′ untranslated region; bp, base pair; CCAAT1/2, Nuclear factor Y (NF‐Y)–specific DNA‐binding sites 1/2 in cin‐MIR156ab locus; Pre‐miR156a/b, precursor‐miR156a/b; TSS, transcription start site. Data in (a–c) are shown as the ratio of H3K4me2 levels relative to that of histone H3, and are means ± SD from three biological replicates. P‐values in (b) and (c) were calculated using a Student's t‐test. GFP, green fluorescent protein; ns, no significance. (d) Proposed model of the contribution of the CiNF‐Y/CiNF–LDL1 module to the aging pathway in chrysanthemum.
Aging‐dependent temporal regulation of MIR156 epigenetic silencing by CiLDL1 and CiNF‐YB8 in chrysanthemum
  • Article
  • Publisher preview available

January 2025

·

100 Reads

Xuekai Gao

·

·

·

[...]

·

Temporal decline in microRNA miR156 expression is crucial for the transition to, and maintenance of, the adult phase and flowering competence in flowering plants. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying the temporal regulation of miR156 reduction remain largely unknown. Here, we investigated the epigenetic mechanism regulating the temporal silencing of cin‐MIR156 in wild chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum indicum), focusing on the role of the lysine‐specific demethylase CiLDL1 and the nuclear factor Y complex. CiLDL1 and CiNF‐YB8 interact with the classical histone‐like fold domain (HFD) of CiNF‐YC1 and CiNF‐YA3, which form distinct heterotrimers binding to the ‘CCAAT’ box in the promoter region of cin‐MIR156ab. CiLDL1 and CiNF‐YB8 have opposing effects on cin‐MIR156ab expression, with influencing histone 3 lysine 4 demethylation (H3K4me2) levels at the cin‐MIR156ab locus. During aging, decreased CiNF‐YB8 expression leads to a quantitative switch from the CiNF‐YA3–CiNF‐YC1–CiNF‐YB8 heterotrimer to the CiNF‐YA3–CiNF‐YC1–CiLDL1 heterotrimer, which reduces H3K4me2 levels at the cin‐MIR156ab locus, thus temporal silencing its expression. Our results thus reveal that the dynamic regulatory shift between CiLDL1 and CiNF‐YB8 ensures proper aging‐dependent flowering in chrysanthemum.

View access options


Fig. 3. CmGID1B-RNAi plants undergo an accelerated juvenile vegetative phase. 726 a. Morphology of leaves of WT and CmGID1B-RNAi chrysanthemum plants grown 727 under LD conditions for 40 days. The first row shows the leaf morphology at 1-6 weeks 728 of normal growth. Juvenile leaves are small with no, or minimal, marginal serrations. 729 Samples were photographed at the same time and images were digitally extracted for 730 comparison. Scale bars, 1 cm. b. Morphology of leaves of WT and CmGID1B-RNAi 731 chrysanthemum plants grown under LD conditions for 90 days. The parts in the red box 732 are partially enlarged for observation. c. Percentage of juvenile leaves among the first 733 five leaves in WT and CmGID1B-RNAi chrysanthemum plants. d. Heatmap showing 734 the expression of differentially expressed genes in WT and CmGID1B-RNAi plants. 735
Fig. 7. Schematic model of CmGID1B-mediated integration of photoperiodic 832 signals and the aging pathway regulating the floral transition in chrysanthemum. 833 In juvenile WT plants, the increase of endogenous GA contents and raised CmPHR2-834 CIB1 complex promoted the expression of CmGID1B and activated GA signal in 835 response to SD. Therefore, miR156 expression was inhibited and CmSPL3 transcription 836 level was up-regulated to initiate the transition from seedlings to adults, and finally 837 promoted the flowering transition through activation of CmFTL1 transcription. In 838 CmGID1B-RNAi plants, there are more bioactive GA contents and higher expression 839 of CmGID1A and CmGID1C, and the enhanced perception of GA signals further 840 inhibits miR156 expression, resulting in increased transcription levels of CmSPL3 and 841 CmFTL1, which accelerated the transition from juvenile to adult and flowering. The 842 number and location of red dots represent the contents and distribution of active GAs, 843 respectively. The dotted line represents indirect regulation, and the solid line represents 844 direct regulation. The lighter color of the same protein or the smaller font size of the 845 same gene represent the lower expression level, and the darker color or the thicker font 846 size represent the higher expression level. SD, short day; WT, wild type; GAs, 847
PHOTOLYASE/BLUE LIGHT RECEPTOR2 regulates chrysanthemum flowering by compensating for gibberellin perception

September 2023

·

93 Reads

·

12 Citations

Plant Physiology

The gibberellins (GA) receptor GA INSENSITIVE DWARF1 (GID1) plays a central role in GA signal perception and transduction. The typical photoperiodic plant chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum morifolium) only flowers when grown in short-day photoperiods. In addition, chrysanthemum flowering is also controlled by the aging pathway, but whether and how GAs participate in photoperiod- and age-dependent regulation of flowering remain unknown. Here, we demonstrate that photoperiod affects CmGID1B expression in response to GAs and developmental age. Moreover, we identified PHOTOLYASE/BLUE LIGHT RECEPTOR2 (PHR2), an atypical photocleavage synthase, as a CRYPTOCHROME-INTERACTING bHLH1 (CIB1) interactor with which it forms a complex in response to short days to activate CmGID1B transcription. Knocking down CmGID1B raised endogenous bioactive GA contents and GA signal perception, in turn modulating the expression of the aging-related genes MicroRNA156 (miR156) and SQUAMOSA PROMOTER BINDING PROTEIN-LIKE3 (SPL3). We propose that exposure to short days accelerates the juvenile-to-adult transition by increasing endogenous GA contents and response to GAs, leading to entry into floral transformation.


Analysis of fragrance compounds in flowers of Chrysanthemum genus

June 2023

·

256 Reads

·

7 Citations

Ornamental Plant Research

Chrysanthemum is one of the four major cut flowers in the world, with high ornamental and economic value. Fragrance is an important ornamental character of chrysanthemum flowers, especially those consumed as tea and other foods, and the flower fragrance is the major determinant of the commercial value of chrysanthemum cultivars. Currently, however, the research on chrysanthemum flower fragrance is mainly focused on the composition and content of fragrant compounds, and a clear classification of fragrance types is lacking. Here, we divided chrysanthemum fragrance into six categories based on sensory evaluation and determined the identity and content of fragrant compounds of chrysanthemum accessions representative of each fragrance type by GC-MS. In addition, we analyzed the conserved aromatic substances responsible for the fruity fragrance type chrysanthemum with multi-functional development potential, providing a theoretical basis for creating new chrysanthemum germplasm with specific fragrance types. The results of this study can accelerate the breeding process of chrysanthemum accessions with new fragrance types.


Fragrance compounds analysis of chrysanthemum

February 2023

·

93 Reads

·

2 Citations

Chrysanthemum morifolium is one of the four major cut flowers in the world and has important ornamental and economic value. Flower fragrance is an important ornamental character of chrysanthemum, especially for tea and edible chrysanthemum, and the excellent fragrance determines its commercial value. At present, however, chrysanthemum is mostly chrysanthemum fragrance and medicinal fragrance, and the research on chrysanthemum flower fragrance mainly focuses on the composition and content of fragrancetic substances, and there is no clear classification of fragrance types. Here, we divided chrysanthemum fragrance into six categories by sensory evaluation, and detected the fragrance components and contents of every representative chrysanthemum with different fragrance types by GC-MS. In addition, we analyzed the genetic conservative substances of fruity fragrance chrysanthemum with multi-functional development potential, which provided a theoretical basis for creating new chrysanthemum germplasm with specific fragrance types, which was conducive to accelerating the biological breeding process of chrysanthemum with new fragrance types.


HbNST1 is a positive regulator of the lignin accumulation in strawflower bracts

January 2023

·

25 Reads

·

1 Citation

Horticultural Plant Journal

Strawflower (Helichrysum bracteatum) capitula have papery bracts and thus have the qualities of a naturally dried flower. The involucral bract cells have a secondary cell wall (SCW) of which a crucial component is lignin. Although the constituents of SCWs have been studied extensively in plants, little is known of the mechanism regulating SCW formation, especially lignin biosynthesis in the involucral bracts of strawflower. In this study, a homolog of NAC SECONDARY WALL THICKENING PROMOTING FACTOR 1, designated HbNST1, was identified as a positive regulator of lignin biosynthesis in strawflower. The transcript level of HbNST1 was the highest in the involucral bracts. Subcellular localization analysis indicated that HbNST1 was localized to the nucleus. Overexpression of HbNST1 in Chrysanthemum indicum promoted the expression of a gene related to lignin biosynthesis, a homolog of cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase, designated CiCAD, suggesting that HbNST1 was associated with the accumulation of lignin in the SCW of the involucral bracts. Taken together, the results suggested that HbNST1 positively regulated lignin accumulation in the involucral bracts and mediated the expression of lignin biosynthesis-related genes in strawflower.


Chrysanthemum MAF2 regulates flowering by repressing gibberellin biosynthesis in response to low temperature

October 2022

·

134 Reads

·

18 Citations

Chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum morifolium) is well known as a photoperiod‐sensitive flowering plant. However, it has also evolved into a temperature‐sensitive ecotype. Low temperature can promote the floral transition of the temperature‐sensitive ecotype, but little is known about the underlying molecular mechanisms. Here, we identified MADS AFFECTING FLOWERING 2 (CmMAF2), a putative MADS‐box gene, which induces floral transition in response to low temperatures independent of day length conditions in this ecotype. CmMAF2 was shown to bind to the promoter of the GA biosynthesis gene CmGA20ox1 and to directly regulate the biosynthesis of bioactive GA1 and GA4. The elevated bioactive GA levels activated LEAFY (CmLFY) expression, ultimately initiating floral transition. In addition, CmMAF2 expression in response to low temperatures was directly activated by CmC3H1, a CCCH‐type zinc‐finger protein upstream. In summary, our results reveal that the CmC3H1–CmMAF2 module regulates flowering time in response to low temperatures by regulating GA biosynthesis in the temperature‐sensitive chrysanthemum ecotype.


Flower color mutation, pink to orange, through CmGATA4 - CCD4a-5 module regulates carotenoids degradation in chrysanthemum

April 2022

·

30 Reads

·

11 Citations

Plant Science

The carotenoids biosynthesis pathway in plants has been studied extensively, yet little is known about the regulatory mechanisms underlying this process, especially for ornamental horticulture plants. In this study, a natural variation of chrysanthemum with orange coloration was identified and compared with the wild type with pink coloration; the content and component of carotenoids were largely enriched in the mutant with orange coloration. CmCCD4a-5, the DNA sequence in both ‘Pink yan’ and the mutant, was identified and shown to function as a carotenoid degradation enzyme. Compared with ‘Pink yan’, the mutant shows lower expression level of CmCCD4a-5. Furthermore, CmGATA4 was found to have an opposite expression trend to CmCCD4a-5, and it could directly bind with the CmCCD4a-5 promoter. Taken together, this study demonstrates that CmGATA4 acts as a negative regulator of CmCCD4a-5 and, furthermore, low expression of CmCCD4a-5 resulted in carotenoid accumulation in the mutant.


Characteristic Volatile Fingerprints of Four Chrysanthemum Teas Determined by HS-GC-IMS

November 2021

·

56 Reads

·

26 Citations

Volatile composition is an important feature that determines flavor, which actively affects the overall evaluation of chrysanthemum tea. In this study, HS-GC-IMS (headspace-gas chromatography-ion mobility spectrometry) was performed to characterize the volatile profiles of different chrysanthemum tea subtypes. Forty-seven volatiles of diverse chemical nature were identified and quantified. Partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) revealed that four chrysanthemum teas were distinct from each other based on their volatile compounds. Furthermore, this work provides reference methods for detecting novel volatile organic compounds in chrysanthemum tea plants and products.

Citations (6)


... Bars, 25 μm Plant Molecular Biology (2025) 115:60 internodes, smaller leaves, and delayed flowering (Liang et al. 2014). CmGID1A, B, and C have been shown to regulate early flowering in chrysanthemum, with CmGID1B playing a more significant role (Zhao et al. 2023). The ectopic expression of SvGID1b and SvGID1c in Salix viminalis caused early bolting, budding, and flowering, resulting in taller plants (Liu et al. 2023a). ...

Reference:

Unveiling the power of PavGID1s: the critical player in sweet cherry flower bud dormancy release
PHOTOLYASE/BLUE LIGHT RECEPTOR2 regulates chrysanthemum flowering by compensating for gibberellin perception

Plant Physiology

... [7] , Pyrus communis L. [8] , Dendrobium officinale [9] , Nymphaea tetragona [10] , Rhododendron simsii [11] , Jasminum sambac [12] , studies were conducted on Chrysanthemum morifolium [13] , Osmanthus fragrans [14] , Camellia japonica [15] , Malus [16] , and Iris tectorum Maxim. [17] Historically, research has focused on factors such as flower shape, color, blooming season, and resilience, with less attention given to the floral scent [18] . ...

Analysis of fragrance compounds in flowers of Chrysanthemum genus

Ornamental Plant Research

... Furthermore, Chrysanthemum morifolium is one of the world's four great cut flowers, with significant ornamental and commercial value. Flower fragrance is a significant ornamental characteristic of chrysanthemum, particularly for tea and edible chrysanthemum, and the quality of the scent influences its commercial value (Wang et al., 2023). Chrysanthemums have long been used in the perfume industry; many perfumes are derived from these flowers, such as Serge Lutens' De Profundis, a Floral fragrance for men and women. ...

Fragrance compounds analysis of chrysanthemum
  • Citing Preprint
  • February 2023

... During the long evolutionary process, chrysanthemums have developed different types of photoperiod-responsive flowering, including SD-dependent autumn chrysanthemum, which blooms in autumn, and summer-autumn chrysanthemum, which blooms in summer to autumn and is less sensitive to photoperiod. The former of these is an obligatory SD chrysanthemum and the latter is a facultative SD chrysanthemum [33,34]. In this study, by comparing the flowering characteristics of different chrysanthemums in response to photoperiod, we found that 'A44', 'C60', and '183' were sensitive to SD conditions and were classified as obligatory SD chrysanthemum, and 'A20', 'C1', 'C27', and 'C31' were not sensitive to SD conditions and were classified as facultative SD chrysanthemum. ...

Chrysanthemum MAF2 regulates flowering by repressing gibberellin biosynthesis in response to low temperature

... There are previously reported examples of GATA genes being involved in these processes in A. thaliana, where GATA proteins have been found to be involved in chlorophyll synthesis and foral development (Bi et al., 2005). In chrysanthemum, CmGATA4 can directly bind to the key gene CmCCD4a-5 for carotenoid degradation, acts as a negative regulator to lower the expression of CmCCD4a-5 resulting in carotenoid accumulation in the mutant (Huang et al., 2022). Additionally, in tomato, SlGATA17 protein interacts with SlHY5, and SlHY5 plays a role upstream of SlGATA17, which inhibits SlGATA17 gene expression by binding to its promter (Wang et al., 2023). ...

Flower color mutation, pink to orange, through CmGATA4 - CCD4a-5 module regulates carotenoids degradation in chrysanthemum
  • Citing Article
  • April 2022

Plant Science

... Beyond their visual appeal, Chrysanthemum species are also renowned for their medicinal and culinary uses, with various plant parts being used in traditional medicine and tea beverage [19,20,21]. In Chrysanthemum species, the pharmacological activities are primarily linked to their component of flavonoids, alkaloids, and sesquiterpene lactones, while the distinctive floral scent is largely attributed to terpenoids, encompassing camphor, α-pinene, cineole, and caryophyllene [22,23,24,25]. Although studies on closely related species highlighted the role of CYP450 genes in the biosynthesis of several important secondary metabolites, such as the artemisinin in Artemisia annua (CYP71AV1), the pyrethrin I in Tanacetum cinerariifolium (CYP82Q3), and the parthenolide in T. parthenium (CYP71CB1), researches on the characteristics and functions of CYP450s in Chrysanthemum remain limited [26,27,28]. ...

Characteristic Volatile Fingerprints of Four Chrysanthemum Teas Determined by HS-GC-IMS