Yin Lin’s research while affiliated with R.O.C. Military Academy and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (1)


Evaluating the best main battle tank using fuzzy decision theory with linguistic criteria evaluation
  • Article

October 2002

·

1,477 Reads

·

673 Citations

European Journal of Operational Research

·

Yin Lin

To face the reality of practical multiple criteria problems usually possessing characters of fuzziness, and to consider group decision making with various subjective–objective backgrounds usually participating in decision-making process. In this paper, the experts' opinions are described by linguistic terms which can be expressed in trapezoidal (or triangular) fuzzy numbers. To make the consensus of the experts consistent, we utilize fuzzy Delphi method to adjust the fuzzy rating of every expert to achieve the consensus condition. For the aggregate of many experts' opinions, we take the operation of fuzzy numbers to get the mean of fuzzy rating, and the mean of weight, . In multi-alternatives and multi-attributes cases, the fuzzy decision matrix is constructed by the mean of the fuzzy rating, . Then, we can derive the aggregate fuzzy numbers by multiplying the fuzzy decision matrix with the corresponding fuzzy attribute weights. The final results become a problem of ranking fuzzy numbers. We also propose an easy procedure of using fuzzy numbers to rank aggregate fuzzy numbers . In this way, we can obtain the best selection for evaluating system. For practical application, we propose an algorithm for evaluating the best main battle tank by fuzzy decision theory and compare it with other method.

Citations (1)


... This indicates that the level of expert consensus on each item was sufficiently high. According to the established guidelines (Cheng & Lin 2002;Dawood et al. 2020), if the average value and the level of expert agreement for the items are less than the threshold value of 0.2, it confirms that consensus among the experts has been achieved for these items. Furthermore, the data reveals that the percentage of expert agreement for all items exceeds the 75% threshold, showing strong alignment among the expert panel on the relevance and appropriateness of each item. ...

Reference:

Validation of Burnout Prevention Module Elements for Informal Caregivers of Depressed Individuals: Fuzzy Delphi Method
Evaluating the best main battle tank using fuzzy decision theory with linguistic criteria evaluation
  • Citing Article
  • October 2002

European Journal of Operational Research