Yael Niv’s scientific contributions

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (1)


Improving the Reliability of Cognitive Task Measures: A Narrative Review
  • Literature Review

February 2023

·

80 Reads

·

61 Citations

Biological Psychiatry Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging

Samuel Zorowitz

·

Yael Niv

Cognitive tasks are capable of providing researchers with crucial insights into the relationship between cognitive processing and psychiatric phenomena. However, many recent studies have found that task measures exhibit poor reliability, which hampers their usefulness for individual-differences research. Here we provide a narrative review of approaches to improve the reliability of cognitive task measures. Specifically, we introduce a taxonomy of experiment design and analysis strategies for improving task reliability. Where appropriate, we highlight studies that are exemplary for improving the reliability of specific task measures. We hope that this article can serve as a helpful guide for experimenters who wish to design a new task, or improve an existing one, to achieve sufficient reliability for use in individual-differences research.

Citations (1)


... Although alternative measures, such as event-related potentials (Versace et al., 2016(Versace et al., , 2019, physical Pavlovian conditioning tasks (Colaizzi et al., 2023;Cope et al., 2023;Joyner et al., 2018) and value-modulated attention capture (VMAC) tasks (Duckworth et al., 2022;Liu et al., 2021;Watson et al., 2024), have been explored for human ST and GT classification, they face both theoretical and practical limitations (see Colaizzi et al., 2020;Heck et al., 2024 for details), therefore the original paradigm implemented by Garofalo and di Pellegrino (2015) currently remains the most widely used (Cherkasova et al., 2024;Degni et al., 2024a;Degni et al., 2024c;Dinu et al., 2024;Schad et al., 2019;Schettino et al., 2024). Nevertheless, the psychometric properties of such measures are unexplored, posing the critical but often underestimated issue of assessing the reliability of measures used in cognitive tasks (Enkavi et al., 2019;Hedge et al., 2018;Pennington et al., 2025;Saeedpour et al., 2023;Zorowitz & Niv, 2023). ...

Reference:

Test–retest reliability of eye-tracking metrics for the measurement and classification of sign- trackers and goal-trackers
Improving the Reliability of Cognitive Task Measures: A Narrative Review
  • Citing Article
  • February 2023

Biological Psychiatry Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging