Xu Chi’s research while affiliated with Beijing Genomics Institute and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (4)


Fig. 2 | The topological graph and the Petri net constructed for neurofibroma. A The topological graph extracted from GIN. B The mEPN-styled Petri net model converted by GINtoSPN.
Fig. 3 | Construction of Petri net model for neurofibromatosis type I. A The Upset plot of the intersections between NF-1-related phenotypes. The blue shade marks the six phenotypes and their intersections. The red rectangles mark the intersections and the shared genes. B The Petri net model constructed for NF-1, without input tokens.
Fig. 4 | Simulation of the normal and NF1-mutated SPN model. A Diagram of the NF1 gene's function. NF1 catalyzes the hydrolysis of the active form of Ras proteins (Ras-GTP), which generates their inactive forms, Ras-GDP. Mutation of the NF1 gene will cause the abnormal accumulation of active Ras proteins and activate the downstream signaling pathways promoting survival, cell growth, and proliferation. B Simulation results of the tokens of KRAS with CHEBI:37038 (purine ribonucleoside 5'-diphosphate) or CHEBI:37045 (purine ribonucleoside 5'-triphosphate) under normal or NF1 mutated conditions. This plot shows only one individual from the 143 human samples of skin fibroblast cells. C Dot-plot of the fold changes and the significance (calculated by −log(p-value)) of the significantly changed molecules in the model under normal or NF1-mutated conditions. Each row is a node in the model. Each column is an individual. The names with ".state" refer to the gene's promoter.
Fig. 5 | Introductions to Petri nets, mEPN, and GINtoSPN conversion. A Basic components of a Petri net. B A simple demonstration of how firing a transition affects token distribution in a marked Petri net. C Components of mEPN notations and an example network. The example illustrates an integrated network of transcription factor bindings, RNA transcriptions, protein translations, protein complex formations, and metabolite reactions. D The conversion of GIN components to mEPN. Intermediate nodes of GIN may be converted to transition nodes of "Binding" or "Catalysis", depending on the products of the reactions. Arrows with
Recent advances in automatic construction of network models
Automatic construction of Petri net models for computational simulations of molecular interaction network
  • Article
  • Full-text available

November 2024

·

25 Reads

·

1 Citation

npj Systems Biology and Applications

Xuefei Lin

·

Xiao Chang

·

Yizheng Zhang

·

[...]

·

Xu Chi
Download

Fig. 1 Construction of global integrative network for human. The workflow consists of (a, b), the extraction of reactions from the BioPAX level3 (owl) files of 10 databases, (c) the conversion of the data into meta-pathways, and (d) the analysis of overlaps and the integration of the databases. The upper part of (b) represents a metabolic reaction and the lower part represents a signaling reaction.
Fig. 2 The overlap analysis of the databases. a The number of human genes and chemical IDs in the ten databases. b-d Upset plots showing the overlap of the genes, chemicals and edges between the 10 databases. Each column in the matrix at the lower part of the plot shows the sources of the set whose number is displayed as a bar in the upper part of the plot.
Fig. 3 GINv2.0 constructed from 10 databases. a Visualization of GINv2.0 by Cytoscape. The largest 20 sub-networks are shown in colors. The small and fragmented interactions which do not connect to the major network are shown on the right bottom. b The node composition of the top 20 sub-networks. n_itmd, number of intermediate nodes. c Zoomed visualization of cluster16. d Dot-plot showing the contribution of different databases to the edges of the clusters. The size of the circle represents the percentage of the edges. The color represents the log10 transformed counts of the overlapping edges.
GINv2.0: a comprehensive topological network integrating molecular interactions from multiple knowledge bases

January 2024

·

65 Reads

·

1 Citation

npj Systems Biology and Applications

Knowledge bases have been instrumental in advancing biological research, facilitating pathway analysis and data visualization, which are now widely employed in the scientific community. Despite the establishment of several prominent knowledge bases focusing on signaling, metabolic networks, or both, integrating these networks into a unified topological network has proven to be challenging. The intricacy of molecular interactions and the diverse formats employed to store and display them contribute to the complexity of this task. In a prior study, we addressed this challenge by introducing a “meta-pathway” structure that integrated the advantages of the Simple Interaction Format (SIF) while accommodating reaction information. Nevertheless, the earlier Global Integrative Network (GIN) was limited to reliance on KEGG alone. Here, we present GIN version 2.0, which incorporates human molecular interaction data from ten distinct knowledge bases, including KEGG, Reactome, and HumanCyc, among others. We standardized the data structure, gene IDs, and chemical IDs, and conducted a comprehensive analysis of the consistency among the ten knowledge bases before combining all unified interactions into GINv2.0. Utilizing GINv2.0, we investigated the glycolysis process and its regulatory proteins, revealing coordinated regulations on glycolysis and autophagy, particularly under glucose starvation. The expanded scope and enhanced capabilities of GINv2.0 provide a valuable resource for comprehensive systems-level analyses in the field of biological research. GINv2.0 can be accessed at: https://github.com/BIGchix/GINv2.0 .


Fig. 2 Construction of the global integrative networks. A The workflow of constructing GINs. The kgml files of 7077 species containing the relations of pathways were downloaded from KEGG. For each pathway of each species, we extracted the information of metabolic reactions and signaling cascades and converted them into meta-pathways. Each meta-pathway has the uniformed data structure for both of metabolic reactions and signaling cascades, then we merged the meta-pathways into the global integrative networks (GINs). ITM, intermediate. B-D The GINs of four species, human, mouse, rice and Arabidopsis. The nodes of compounds or intermediates containing compounds are in red. The nodes of proteins or intermediates containing no compounds are in light blue
The global integrative network: integration of signaling and metabolic pathways

September 2022

·

64 Reads

·

4 Citations

aBIOTECH

Unlabelled: The crosstalk between signaling and metabolic pathways has been known to play key roles in human diseases and plant biological processes. The integration of signaling and metabolic pathways can provide an essential reference framework for crosstalk analysis. However, current databases use distinct structures to present signaling and metabolic pathways, which leads to the chaos in the integrated networks. Moreover, for the metabolic pathways, the metabolic enzymes and the reactions are disconnected by the current widely accepted layout of edges and nodes, which hinders the topological analysis of the integrated networks. Here, we propose a novel "meta-pathway" structure, which uses the uniformed structure to display the signaling and metabolic pathways, and resolves the difficulty in linking the metabolic enzymes to the reactions topologically. We compiled a comprehensive collection of global integrative networks (GINs) by merging the meta-pathways of 7077 species. We demonstrated the assembly of the signaling and metabolic pathways using the GINs of four species-human, mouse, Arabidopsis, and rice. Almost all of the nodes were assembled into one major network for each of the four species, which provided opportunities for robust crosstalk and topological analysis, and knowledge graph construction. Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s42994-022-00078-1.


Representative pathway interactions and the design of GESTIA. a. Visualization of the gene interactions between REACTOME_MAPK1_ERK2_ ACTIVATION and REACTOME_MAPK3_ERK1_ACTIVATION. Vertices in red represent genes in the first of the two pathways, yellow represent genes in the second, and blue represent shared genes. b. Visualization of the gene interactions between REACTOME_MAPK1_ERK2_ACTIVATION and REACTOME_PI3K_ AKT_ACTIVATION. The color set of the vertices is the same as in a. c. Visualization of the gene interactions between BIOCARTA_MTOR_PATHWAY and REACTOME_PI3K_ AKT_ACTIVATION. from MSigDB. The color set of the vertices is the same as in a. d. The design of GESTIA. The color set of the vertices is the same as in a, and green represent pseudo-vertices
Demonstration of the similarities and upstream/downstream relationships between oncogenic pathways and DNA repair pathways. a. The heatmap of the Jaccard Index matrix of oncogenic pathways and DNA repair pathways. Fonts in blue represent oncogenic pathways, fonts in pink represent DNA repair pathways. b. The heatmap of the GESTIA scores between oncogenic pathways and DNA repair pathways. The color set and orders of the rows and columns are the same as in a. c. The undirected weighted network constructed using the Jaccard Index matrix as an adjacency matrix. The weights of the edges are proportional of the Jaccard Index scores in the matrix. Blue represent oncogenic pathways, pink represent DNA repair pathways. d. The directed weighted network constructed using the GESTIA matrix as an adjacency matrix. Negative values were filtered out because of the symmetry of the matrix. The color set are the same as in c
Assembly of enriched pathways from two real datasets based on GESTIA scores. a. The directed weighted network constructed using the GESTIA scores of the enriched pathways in Lin et al. 2018. Red vertices represent pathways that were up-regulated, and blue vertices represent down-regulated pathways. b. Visualization of the gene interactions between BIOCARTA_MAPK_PATHWAY and HALLMARK_XENOBIOTIC_METABOLISM (from MSigDB). Red vertices represent the genes in the first of the two pathways; the yellow ones represent genes in the second. To avoid overcomplicating the figure, we only showed the part of the figure where the two pathways interact with each other. c. Visualization of the gene interactions between GO_CELL_CYCLE and GO_MITOCHONDRIAL_ MEMBRANE_PART (from MSigDB). The color set of the vertices is the same as in b. d. The directed weighted network constructed using the GESTIA scores of the enriched pathways in Giustacchini et al. 2017. The color set of the vertices is the same as in a
Assembly of pathways/modules with/without crosstalk analysis. a. Assembly of the enriched pathways from the fat remodelling study of Donato et al. 2013. b. Assembly of the pathways/modules after filtering by crosstalk analysis on the fat remodelling study. c. Assembly of the enriched pathways from the cervical ripening study of Hassen et al. 2009. d. Assembly of the pathways/modules from Hassen et al. 2009 after filtering by crosstalk analysis. Green vertices are pathways/modules that are known to be related to the study. Red vertices are obvious false positive pathways/modules. White vertices are uncertain pathways/modules
Analysing the meta-interaction between pathways by gene set topological impact analysis

October 2020

·

54 Reads

·

3 Citations

BMC Genomics

Background Pathway analysis is widely applied in transcriptome analysis. Given certain transcriptomic changes, current pathway analysis tools tend to search for the most impacted pathways, which provides insight into underlying biological mechanisms. Further refining of the enriched pathways and extracting functional modules by “crosstalk” analysis have been proposed. However, the upstream/downstream relationships between the modules, which may provide extra biological insights such as the coordination of different functional modules and the signal transduction flow have been ignored. Results To quantitatively analyse the upstream/downstream relationships between functional modules, we developed a novel GEne Set Topological Impact Analysis (GESTIA), which could be used to assemble the enriched pathways and functional modules into a super-module with a topological structure. We showed the advantages of this analysis in the exploration of extra biological insight in addition to the individual enriched pathways and functional modules. Conclusions GESTIA can be applied to a broad range of pathway/module analysis result. We hope that GESTIA may help researchers to get one additional step closer to understanding the molecular mechanism from the pathway/module analysis results.

Citations (4)


... Higher-token Petri net computad projects could include: • Categorical Alzheimer's dynamics (Norton et al. 2024) • Enzyme kinetics (Michaelis-Menten) for epigenetic mutation and damage repair rates (Bardini et al. 2016) • 2-Segal space immune pathway analysis (Lin et al. 2024) • AQFT-FQFT field theory of senescent cell clearance • Feynman category fibration analysis of inflammaging • Open Petri net model of longevity SIR (Baez et al. 2022) ...

Reference:

Categorical Longevity: Higher Tokens, Petri Net Computads, and Well-being
Automatic construction of Petri net models for computational simulations of molecular interaction network

npj Systems Biology and Applications

... Conversion of meta-pathways to Petri nets We previously introduced the concept of the meta-pathway structure by the construction of GIN, first from KEGG data for over 7000 species (the GIN version 1) and later by integrating 10 human knowledge bases (the GIN version 2) 32,44 . The key feature of the meta-pathway structure is the "intermediate" nodes we introduced in the graph to link the substrates, enzymes, and the products of biochemical reactions. ...

GINv2.0: a comprehensive topological network integrating molecular interactions from multiple knowledge bases

npj Systems Biology and Applications

... Metabolomics can be combined with other omics technologies to reveal the regulatory mechanisms of metabolic networks (Lin et al. 2022). By integrating genomics and transcriptomics data, key genes regulating metabolic processes and the underlying pathways can be identified, offering insights into the regulation of metabolic processes (Fernie et al. 2004;Lau and Sattely 2015;Lu et al. 2023). ...

The global integrative network: integration of signaling and metabolic pathways

aBIOTECH

... However, inconsistent naming conventions, particularly for lipid species (Casbas Pinto et al., 2017), could have presented challenges as well, as many metabolites of these classes may be excluded due to inconsistent naming. Other 'omics, such as transcriptomics, have applied pathway summary scores or similar metrics to evaluate the importance of pathways, rather than individual 'omic markers, using a meta-analysis approach (Yan et al., 2020), and this may represent a future direction for metabolomics meta-analyses. Future work in the field of metabolomics may benefit from evaluating the utility of pathway-level meta-analysis tools in metabolomic data, which could ultimately offer an advantage over reliance on consistent reporting of individual metabolites. ...

Analysing the meta-interaction between pathways by gene set topological impact analysis

BMC Genomics