Xinyue Cui’s research while affiliated with Anhui Agricultural University and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (4)


MoSMI1 is important for vegetative growth, mycelial morphology, conidiation, and conidial morphology of Magnaporthe oryzae. (a) Colonies of the wild‐type strain Guy11 (WT), ΔMosmi1 mutant, and the complemented strain ΔMosmi1/MoSMI1 on complete medium (CM) plates were observed and captured after 7 days at 28°C. (b) Colony diameters were measured and statistically analysed. For each strain, three independent biological experiments were performed with four replicates each time. Error bars represent SD and asterisks indicate significant differences between the WT strain Guy11 and ∆Mosmi1 mutant estimated using Student's t test (**p < 0.01). (c) The hyphal morphology of all tested strains. All the tested strains were cultured in liquid CM for 48 h and photographed under an inverted fluorescent microscope. Bar, 20 μm. (d) All the strains were incubated on an artificial hydrophobic surface for 24 h at 28°C. Conidia and conidiophore formation were observed and photographed using an inverted fluorescent microscope. Bar, 50 μm. (e) Statistical analysis of the conidiation of all tested strains. For each strain, three independent biological experiments with four replicates were performed each time. Error bars represent SD and asterisks indicate significant differences between the wild‐type strain Guy11, ΔMosmi1 mutant estimated using Student's t test (**p < 0.01). (f) Conidial morphology of the tested strains. Conidia collected from the WT strain Guy11, ΔMosmi1 mutant and complemented strain ΔMosmi1/MoSMI1 were stained with calcofluor white (CFW) and photographed under an inverted fluorescent microscope. Bar, 20 μm. (g) Proportion of each conidial type. One hundred conidia were counted for each strain and three experiments were performed. Error bars represent SD and asterisks indicate significant differences (*p < 0.05).
MoSMI1 is required for the organization of microtubule and cytoplasmic division in Magnaporthe oryzae. (a) Colonies of the wild‐type strain Guy11, ΔMosmi1 mutant, and complemented strain ΔMosmi1/MoSMI1 were cultured in complete medium (CM) plates containing 15 μg/mL benomyl in darkness at 28°C for 7 days. (b) Statistical analysis of the relative inhibition rate (%) of the tested strains. For each strain, three independent biological experiments with four replicates were performed each time. Error bars represent SD, and asterisks above the columns indicate significant differences between the wild‐type strain Guy11, ΔMosmi1 mutant estimated by Student's t test (**p < 0.01). (c) Subcellular localization of β‐tubulin‐RFP in the wild‐type strain Guy11, and the ΔMosmi1 mutant, and the complemented strain ΔMosmi1/MoSMI1 in vegetative hyphae stage. Bar, 10 μm. (d) Subcellular localization of H1‐RFP in the wild‐type strain Guy11 and ΔMosmi1 mutant in vegetative hyphae. Bar, 10 μm. Cell wall was visualized using calcofluor white (CFW). The fluorescence signals were observed using a laser scanning confocal microscope. (e) Statistical analysis of the proportion of abnormal number of cell nuclei in a single cell. At least 100 hyphal cells were counted in each strain. Three experiments were performed. Error bars represent SD and asterisks indicate significant differences (**p < 0.01).
MoSMI1 is required for pathogenicity of Magnaporthe oryzae. (a) Pathogenicity on barley leaves. Mycelial agar plugs of all tested strains were inoculated on 7‐day‐old barley leaves and photographed at 5 days post‐inoculation (dpi). U, unwounded (intact) leaf; W, wounded leaf. Bar, 10 mm. (b) Statistical analysis of the lesion area of all tested strains on barley leaves using ImageJ software. Three experiments were performed. Error bars represent SD and asterisks indicate significant differences (**p < 0.01). (c) Pathogenicity on barley leaves. Conidial suspensions (5 × 10⁴ conidia/mL) of all tested strains were dropped on 7‐day‐old barley leaves and photographed at 5 dpi. Bar, 10 mm. (d) Statistical analysis of the lesion area of all tested strains on barley leaves using ImageJ software. Three experiments were performed. Error bars represent SD and asterisks indicate significant differences (**p < 0.01). (e) Pathogenicity on rice seedlings. Conidial suspensions (5 × 10⁴ conidia/mL in a 0.2% wt/vol gelatin solution) from each tested strain were sprayed onto 14‐day‐old rice seedlings and photographed at 5 dpi. Bar, 10 mm. (f) Lesion numbers were counted within a 5 cm length of leaf from each strain, and a minimum of three leaves were assessed for each strain. Three experiments were performed. Error bars represent SD and asterisks indicate significant differences (**p < 0.01).
MoSmi1 affects appressorium formation, invasive hyphae (IH) expansion, and host reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavenging. (a) Conidial suspensions (5 × 10⁴ conidia/mL) of all the tested strains were inoculated on an artificial hydrophobic surface and viewed at 6, 12, and 24 h post‐inoculation (hpi). Bar, 20 μm. (b) Statistical analysis of appressorium formation rate (%) of all tested strains. A minimum of 100 conidia were observed and counted in each strain. Three experiments were performed. Error bars represent SD and asterisks indicate significant differences (**p < 0.01). (c) Conidial suspensions (5 × 10⁴ conidia/mL) of all tested strains were dropped on the back of barley leaves, and barley epidermal cells were observed at 24, 36, and 48 hpi. Type I, only penetration peg without invasive hypha; Type II, only one single invasive hypha without branches; Type III, more than one branch but restricted to one host cell; Type IV, more than one branch and extended to neighbouring host cells. Bar, 20 μm. (d) Statistical analysis of four types of IH. At least 100 penetration sites were counted for each strain. Three experiments were performed. Error bars represent SD. (e) Conidial suspensions of all tested strains were inoculated onto barley leaves for 30 h and stained with 3,3′‐diaminobenzidine (DAB) solution. Bar, 25 μm. (f) Statistical analysis of the proportion of infected cells stained by DAB. For each strain, at least 100 invading cells were observed and the number of stained cells was counted. Error bars represent SD and asterisks indicate significant differences (**p < 0.01). (g) Barley leaves were inoculated with conidial suspensions of all tested strains treated with diphenyleneiodonium (DPI), and IH growth was observed at 30 hpi. Dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO) treatment was a control that was used to dissolve DPI. Bar, 25 μm. (h) Relative expression of 10 ROS detoxification‐related genes in the wild‐type Guy11 and ΔMosmi1 mutant. The β‐tubulin gene (MGG_00604) was used as the reference gene. Three independent biological experiments with three replicates were performed. Error bars represent SD and asterisk represents significant differences (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, NS, p > 0.05).
MoSMI1 affects septin ring formation in Magnaporthe oryzae. (a, b) The conidial suspensions (5 × 10⁴ conidia/mL) of the wild‐type Guy11 and ΔMosmi1 mutant expressing Sep3‐GFP or Sep5‐GFP were inoculated on an artificial hydrophobic surface and the appressoria were observed at 24 h post‐inoculation under a laser scanning confocal microscope. The distribution of the fluorescence signal in a transverse section (indicated by the white dotted line) was analysed using ImageJ software. Bar, 5 μm.

+3

A novel MAP kinase‐interacting protein MoSmi1 regulates development and pathogenicity in Magnaporthe oryzae
  • Article
  • Full-text available

July 2024

·

74 Reads

·

1 Citation

·

Xinyue Cui

·

Junlian Xiao

·

[...]

·

The cell wall is the first barrier against external adversity and plays roles in maintaining normal physiological functions of fungi. Previously, we reported a nucleosome assembly protein, MoNap1, in Magnaporthe oryzae that plays a role in cell wall integrity (CWI), stress response, and pathogenicity. Moreover, MoNap1 negatively regulates the expression of MoSMI1 encoded by MGG_03970. Here, we demonstrated that deletion of MoSMI1 resulted in a significant defect in appressorium function, CWI, cell morphology, and pathogenicity. Further investigation revealed that MoSmi1 interacted with MoOsm1 and MoMps1 and affected the phosphorylation levels of MoOsm1, MoMps1, and MoPmk1, suggesting that MoSmi1 regulates biological functions by mediating mitogen‐activated protein kinase (MAPK) signalling pathway in M. oryzae. In addition, transcriptome data revealed that MoSmi1 regulates many infection‐related processes in M. oryzae, such as membrane‐related pathway and oxidation reduction process. In conclusion, our study demonstrated that MoSmi1 regulates CWI by mediating the MAPK pathway to affect development and pathogenicity of M. oryzae.

Download

Protein disulfide isomerase MoPdi1 regulates fungal development, virulence, and endoplasmic reticulum homeostasis in Magnaporthe oryzae

March 2024

·

45 Reads

Journal of Integrative Agriculture

Rice blast, caused by Magnaporthe oryzae, is a fungal disease that causes devastating damage to rice production worldwide. During infection, pathogens secrete effector proteins that modulate plant immunity. Disulfide bond formation catalyzed by protein disulfide isomerases (PDI) is essential for protein folding and maturation. However, the biological function of Pdi1 in M. oryzae has not yet been characterized. In this study, we identified the endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-located protein, MoPdi1, in M. oryzae. MoPdi1 regulates conidiation, cell wall stress, and pathogenicity of M. oryzae. Furthermore, the CGHC active sites in the a and a' redox domain of MoPdi1 were essential for the biological function of MoPDI1. Further tests demonstrated that MoPdi1 was involved in the regulation of ER stress and positively regulated ER phagy. We also found that MoPdi1 interacted with MoHut1. Deletion of MoPDI1 led to the bereft of MoHut1 dimerization, which depends on the formation of disulfide bonds. In addition, MoPdi1 affected the normal secretion of the cytoplasmic effector AVR-Pia. We provided evidence that MoHut1 is important for the vegetative growth, conidiation, and pathogenicity in M. oryzae. Therefore, our findings could provide a suitable target point for designing antifungal agrochemicals against rice blast fungus.


FIGURE Venn diagrams of OTU distribution of the eeS rRNA gene (A, C) and the ITS gene (B, D) among the eight treatments in two seasons.
FIGURE Cladograms plotted from the LEfSe analysis show significant diierences (P < ...) in the relative abundance of ffS rRNA gene-based bacterial taxa among the four treatments before maize planting (A). The results of LEfSe analysis show taxa that diiered significantly among the four treatments before maize planting (B). The cladogram plotted from LEfSe analysis shows significant diierences (P < ...) in the relative abundance of the ITS gene-based fungal taxa among the four treatments (C). The results of LEfSe analysis show taxa that diiered significantly among the four treatments (D).
Effect of different straw retention techniques on soil microbial community structure in wheat–maize rotation system

January 2023

·

91 Reads

·

20 Citations

Rotational straw return technique is considered an effective measure for improving soil quality and maintaining soil microorganisms. However, there are few reports on the influence of wheat–maize crop rotation and straw-returning tillage on crop soil microbial communities in China. This study aimed to investigate how wheat or maize straw-incorporation practices affect bacterial and fungal communities under wheat–maize rotational farming practices. To clarify the effects of straw incorporation on microbial composition, microbial communities from soils subjected to different treatments were identified using high-throughput sequencing. Our results showed that, before corn planting, wheat and maize straw returning reduced bacterial density and increased their diversity but had no effect on fungal diversity. However, before wheat planting, returning wheat and corn stalks to the field increased the diversity of soil bacteria and fungi, whereas returning corn stalks to the field reduced the diversity of fungi and other microorganisms. Straw return significantly increased the relative abundance of Ascomycota in the first season and decreased it in the second season; however, in the second season, wheat straw return increased the relative abundance of Bradyrhizobium , which can promote the soil microbial nitrogen cycle and provide nitrogen to the soil. Wheat and maize straw return increased the relative abundance of Chaetomium , whereas, individually, they decreased the relative abundance. In addition, we detected two fungal pathogens ( Fusarium and Trichoderma ) under the two planting patterns and found that the relative abundance of pathogenic Fusarium increased with wheat straw return (FW and SW). Trichoderma increased after treatment with maize straw return before wheat planting (S group). These results suggest that wheat straw return (FW and SW) and maize straw return might have a negative impact on the pathogenic risk. Therefore, further studies are needed to determine how to manage straw returns in agricultural production.


MoNap1, a Nucleosome Assemble Protein 1, Regulates Growth, Development, and Pathogenicity in Magnaporthe oryzae

December 2022

·

79 Reads

·

2 Citations

Nap1 is an evolutionarily conserved protein from yeast to human and is involved in diverse physiological processes, such as nucleosome assembly, histone shuttling between the nucleus and cytoplasm, transcriptional regulation, and the cell cycle regulation. In this paper, we identified nucleosome assemble protein MoNap1 in Magnaporthe oryzae and investigated its function in path-ogenicity. Deletion of MoNAP1 resulted in reduced growth and conidiation, decreased appresso-rium formation rate, and impaired virulence. MoNap1 affects appressorium turgor and utilization of glycogen and lipid droplets. In addition, MoNap1 is involved in the regulation of cell wall, oxidation , and hyperosmotic stress. The subcellular localization experiments showed that MoNap1 is located in the cytoplasm. MoNap1 interacts with MoNbp2, MoClb3, and MoClb1 in M. oryzae. Moreover , deletion of MoNBP2 and MoCLB3 has no effects on vegetative growth, conidiation, and path-ogenicity. Transcriptome analysis reveals that MoNAP1 is involved in regulating pathogenicity, the melanin biosynthetic process. Taken together, our results showed that MoNap1 plays a crucial role in growth, conidiation, and pathogenicity of M. oryzae.

Citations (2)


... Because bacteria are more sensitive to environmental changes while fungi are more adaptable to long-term stable soil conditions. Furthermore, bacterial communities show more variety than fungi in complex cropping systems (such as continuous or rotational cropping) [32][33][34]. Different crop types have different root structures, secretions, and residues [35], affecting soil physicochemical properties and greatly influencing the structure and diversity of soil microbial communities [36]. For example, Neha et al. (2022) found differences in soil microbial biomass and microbial community structure across crops (chickpea, mustard, soybean, and maize) in tropical agroecosystems [35]. ...

Reference:

Rare Taxa as Key Drivers of Soil Multi-Nutrient Cycling Under Different Crop Types
Effect of different straw retention techniques on soil microbial community structure in wheat–maize rotation system

... We previously reported a nucleosome assembly protein, MoNap1, that regulates appressorium formation, response to cell wall stresses, cytoplasmic division, and virulence (Zhang, Wang, et al., 2022). Based on transcriptome data previously, we screened for differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between the wild-type Guy11 and ΔMonap1 mutant and identified MGG_03970. ...

MoNap1, a Nucleosome Assemble Protein 1, Regulates Growth, Development, and Pathogenicity in Magnaporthe oryzae