Xin Bin’s scientific contributions

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (1)


Intertextuality from a Critical Perspective
  • Article

June 2009

·

273 Reads

·

14 Citations

Chinese Semiotic Studies

Xin Bin

The Intertextual nature of texts has drawn little attention from linguists, though its important role in determining the production and interpretation of texts has long been recognized by literary critics. An intertextual approach to text study has been an attempt to break up the unquestioned organism of text and to promote the idea that any text may be multi-levelled and resistant to unification. " Intertextuality" is a very complicated concept and the intertextual approach to the study of text has been facing lots of difficulties and problems in its implementation. This paper suggests a critical perspective to this approach from which we may hopefully overcome some of the difficulties and achieve some satisfactory results in non-literary text analysis.

Citations (1)


... However, the classifications of different discourse types are highly complicated and that may hinder the studies on them. In addition, though the former studies on discourse types have ever mentioned the relationships among different discourse types [7][8][9][10][11], they rarely focus on the classifications of the discourse types. Recently, Xinfang Liu, a Chinese scholar who is an expert in Rhetoric and Writing, has turned his attention to the specialized investigations of the categorizations of different discourse types in On the Symbiosis of Discourse Types. ...

Reference:

A Review on the Book of On the Symbiosis of Discourse Types
Intertextuality from a Critical Perspective
  • Citing Article
  • June 2009

Chinese Semiotic Studies