Xiaoxi Han’s research while affiliated with First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (4)


Study workflow.
Identification of core prognostic genes and enrichment analysis. (A) Venn diagram illustrating the intersection of 685 genes associated with autophagy, senescence, and STAD. (B) Volcano plot of DEASRGs based on intersected genes. (C) GO functional annotation of DEASRGs. (D) KEGG enrichment analysis of DEASRGs. (E) Univariate Cox regression analysis identifying 29 genes. (F) Frequencies of CNV gain and loss among 29 prognostic genes. (G) Circular plots visualizing chromosome distributions of core prognostic genes.
Development and verification the ASRGs signature. (A) LASSO regression model selection curve with log(λ) on the x-axis and partial likelihood deviance on the y-axis. (B) Coefficients of the LASSO regression model. (C, D) KM survival curves of OS. (E, G) Survival curves of patients with GC. (F, H) Distribution of survival status based on risk score. (I, J) Heatmaps of gene expression for the prognostic model genes. (K, M) Comparison of ROC curves. (L, N) ROC curve using temporal information (time-dependent ROC curves).
Association of the prognostic signature with gene clusters and immunological features. (A) The heat map display of consensus clustering is categorized into three cluster (C1 = 277; C2 = 63; C3 = 26). (B) PCA showing the perfect separation of C1, C2 and C3. (C) KM survival curves with three distinct clusters. (D) A Sankey diagram illustrating the link between gene clusters, risk group, and survival status. (E) Variations in risk score among the three gene subtypes. (F-H) ESTIMATE algorithm results for three gene clusters. (I) Expression of immune checkpoints related genes. (J) The heat map depicting variations in immune cell infiltration as determined using TIMER, CIERSORT, quanTIseq, MCPcounter, xCell, and EPIC algorithms.
Establishment and validation of the nomogram. (A, E) A nomogram was established to forecast the 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year OS. (B, F) Calibration plots illustrating the agreement of predicted survival rates compared to the actual observed survival rates. (C, G) A DCA was carried out to compare the net benefits of the nomogram incorporating the prognostic signature, the nomogram excluding the prognostic signature, and other factors. (D, H) The AUC was employed to compare the predictive accuracy of the nomogram with other prognostic markers.

+4

A prognostic model based on autophagy-and senescence-related genes for gastric cancer: implications for immunotherapy and personalized treatment
  • Article
  • Full-text available

March 2025

·

15 Reads

Shuming Chen

·

Xiaoxi Han

·

Yangyang Lu

·

[...]

·

Weiwei Qi

Background The process of human aging is accompanied by an increased susceptibility to various cancers, including gastric cancer. This heightened susceptibility is linked to the shared molecular characteristics between aging and tumorigenesis. Autophagy is considered a critical mediator connecting aging and cancer, exerting a dynamic regulatory effect in conjunction with cellular senescence during tumor progression. In this study, a combined analysis of autophagy- and senescence-related genes was employed to comprehensively capture tumor heterogeneity. Methods The gene expression profiles and clinical data for GC samples were acquired from TCGA and GEO databases. Differentially expressed autophagy- and senescence-related genes (DEASRGs) were identified between tumor and normal tissues. Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analyses were carried out to provide insights into biological significance. A prognostic signature was established using univariate Cox and LASSO regression analyses. Furthermore, consensus clustering analyses and nomograms were employed for survival prediction. TME and drug sensitivity analyses were conducted to compare differences between the groups. To predict immunotherapy efficacy, the correlations between risk score and immune checkpoints, MSI, TMB, and TIDE scores were investigated. Results A fourteen-gene prognostic signature with superior accuracy was constructed. GC patients were stratified into three distinct clusters, each exhibiting significant variations in their prognosis and immune microenvironments. Drug sensitivity analysis revealed that the low-risk group demonstrated greater responsiveness to several commonly used chemotherapeutic agents for gastric cancer, including oxaliplatin. TME analysis further indicated that the high-risk group exhibited increased immune cell infiltration, upregulated expression of ICs, and a higher stromal score, suggesting a greater capacity for immune evasion. In contrast, the low-risk group was characterized by a higher proportion of microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) cases, an elevated TIDE score, and a greater TMB, indicating a higher likelihood of benefiting from immunotherapy. In addition, Single-cell sequencing demonstrated that TXNIP was expressed in epithelial cells. Cellular experiments preliminarily verified that TXNIP could promote the proliferation and migration of gastric cancer cells. Conclusion This study presents a robust predictive model for GC prognosis using autophagy- and senescence-related genes, demonstrating its ability to predict immune infiltration, immunotherapy effectiveness, and guide personalized treatment.

Download

An investigation of the molecular characterization of the tripartite motif (TRIM) family and primary validation of TRIM31 in gastric cancer

July 2024

·

13 Reads

·

2 Citations

Human Genomics

Most TRIM family members characterized by the E3-ubiquitin ligases, participate in ubiquitination and tumorigenesis. While there is a dearth of a comprehensive investigation for the entire family in gastric cancer (GC). By combining the TCGA and GEO databases, common TRIM family members (TRIMs) were obtained to investigate gene expression, gene mutations, and clinical prognosis. On the basis of TRIMs, a consensus clustering analysis was conducted, and a risk assessment system and prognostic model were developed. Particularly, TRIM31 with clinical prognostic and diagnostic value was chosen for single-gene bioinformatics analysis, in vitro experimental validation, and immunohistochemical analysis of clinical tissue microarrays. The combined dataset consisted of 66 TRIMs, of which 52 were differentially expressed and 43 were differentially prognostic. Significant survival differences existed between the gene clusters obtained by consensus clustering analysis. Using 4 differentially expressed genes identified by multivariate Cox regression and LASSO regression, a risk scoring system was developed. Higher risk scores were associated with a poorer prognosis, suppressive immune cell infiltration, and drug resistance. Transcriptomic data and clinical sample tissue microarrays confirmed that TRIM31 was highly expressed in GC and associated with a poor prognosis. Pathway enrichment analysis, cell migration and colony formation assay, EdU assay, reactive oxygen species (ROS) assay, and mitochondrial membrane potential assay revealed that TRIM31 may be implicated in cell cycle regulation and oxidative stress-related pathways, contribute to gastric carcinogenesis. This study investigated the whole functional and expression profile and a risk score system based on the TRIM family in GC. Further investigation centered around TRIM31 offers insight into the underlying mechanisms of action exhibited by other members of its family in the context of GC. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40246-024-00631-7.


Table 1 (continued)
Table 2 (continued)
Baseline characteristics of patients in the total SEER population, modeling cohort, and internal validation cohort
Modeling cohort for Gray's test Variables Death risk of cancer Death risk of com- petitive events
Constructing a prognostic model for colorectal cancer with synchronous liver metastases after preoperative chemotherapy: a study based on SEER and an external validation cohort

June 2024

·

17 Reads

·

1 Citation

Clinical and Translational Oncology

Background The combination of preoperative chemotherapy and surgical treatment has been shown to significantly enhance the prognosis of colorectal cancer with liver metastases (CRLM) patients. Nevertheless, as a result of variations in clinicopathological parameters, the prognosis of this particular group of patients differs considerably. This study aimed to develop and evaluate Cox proportional risk regression model and competing risk regression model using two patient cohorts. The goal was to provide a more precise and personalized prognostic evaluation system. Methods We collected information on individuals who had a pathological diagnosis of colorectal cancer between 2000 and 2019 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Database. We obtained data from patients who underwent pathological diagnosis of colorectal cancer and got comprehensive therapy at the hospital between January 1, 2010, and June 1, 2022. The SEER data collected after screening according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria were separated into two cohorts: a training cohort (training cohort) and an internal validation cohort (internal validation cohort), using a random 1:1 split. Subgroup Kaplan–Meier (K–M) survival analyses were conducted on each of the three groups. The data that received following screening from the hospital were designated as the external validation cohort. The subsequent variables were chosen for additional examination: age, gender, marital status, race, tumor site, pretreatment carcinoembryonic antigen level, tumor size, T stage, N stage, pathological grade, number of tumor deposits, perineural invasion, number of regional lymph nodes examined, and number of positive regional lymph nodes. The primary endpoint was median overall survival (mOS). In the training cohort, we conducted univariate Cox regression analysis and utilized a stepwise regression approach, employing the Akaike information criterion (AIC) to select variables and create Cox proportional risk regression models. We evaluated the accuracy of the model using calibration curve, receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), and area under curve (AUC). The effectiveness of the models was assessed using decision curve analysis (DCA). To evaluate the non-cancer-related outcomes, we analyzed variables that had significant impacts using subgroup cumulative incidence function (CIF) and Gray’s test. These analyses were used to create competing risk regression models. Nomograms of the two models were constructed separately and prognostic predictions were made for the same patients in SEER database. Results This study comprised a total of 735 individuals. The mOS of the training cohort, internal validation cohort, and QDU cohort was 55.00 months (95%CI 46.97–63.03), 48.00 months (95%CI 40.65–55.35), and 68.00 months (95%CI 54.91–81.08), respectively. The multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that age, N stage, presence of perineural infiltration, number of tumor deposits and number of positive regional lymph nodes were identified as independent prognostic risk variables ( p < 0.05). In comparison to the conventional TNM staging model, the Cox proportional risk regression model exhibited a higher C-index. After controlling for competing risk events, age, N stage, presence of perineural infiltration, number of tumor deposits, number of regional lymph nodes examined, and number of positive regional lymph nodes were independent predictors of the risk of cancer-specific mortality ( p < 0.05). Conclusion We have developed a prognostic model to predict the survival of patients with synchronous CRLM who undergo preoperative chemotherapy and surgery. This model has been tested internally and externally, confirming its accuracy and reliability.


Development and verification of a manganese metabolism- and immune-related genes signature for prediction of prognosis and immune landscape in gastric cancer

May 2024

·

16 Reads

·

2 Citations

Background Gastric cancer (GC) poses a global health challenge due to its widespread prevalence and unfavorable prognosis. Although immunotherapy has shown promise in clinical settings, its efficacy remains limited to a minority of GC patients. Manganese, recognized for its role in the body’s anti-tumor immune response, has the potential to enhance the effectiveness of tumor treatment when combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Methods Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) databases was utilized to obtain transcriptome information and clinical data for GC. Unsupervised clustering was employed to stratify samples into distinct subtypes. Manganese metabolism- and immune-related genes (MIRGs) were identified in GC by univariate Cox regression and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analysis. We conducted gene set variation analysis, and assessed the immune landscape, drug sensitivity, immunotherapy efficacy, and somatic mutations. The underlying role of NPR3 in GC was further analyzed in the single-cell RNA sequencing data and cellular experiments. Results GC patients were classified into four subtypes characterized by significantly different prognoses and tumor microenvironments. Thirteen genes were identified and established as MIRGs, demonstrating exceptional predictive effectiveness in GC patients. Distinct enrichment patterns of molecular functions and pathways were observed among various risk subgroups. Immune infiltration analysis revealed a significantly greater abundance of macrophages and monocytes in the high-risk group. Drug sensitivity analysis identified effective drugs for patients, while patients in the low-risk group could potentially benefit from immunotherapy. NPR3 expression was significantly downregulated in GC tissues. Single-cell RNA sequencing analysis indicated that the expression of NPR3 was distributed in endothelial cells. Cellular experiments demonstrated that NPR3 facilitated the proliferation of GC cells. Conclusion This is the first study to utilize manganese metabolism- and immune-related genes to identify the prognostic MIRGs for GC. The MIRGs not only reliably predicted the clinical outcome of GC patients but also hold the potential to guide future immunotherapy interventions for these patients.

Citations (3)


... Additionally, several TRIM proteins, including TRIM15, TRIM47, and TRIM55, have been implicated in EMT. These proteins facilitate EMT by modulating key molecular markers such as E-cadherin, N-cadherin, and Vimentin, contributing to increased cancer cell invasiveness and metastatic potential [74][75][76]145,[151][152][153][154][155][156][157][158][159]. ...

Reference:

The Role and Mechanism of TRIM Proteins in Gastric Cancer
An investigation of the molecular characterization of the tripartite motif (TRIM) family and primary validation of TRIM31 in gastric cancer

Human Genomics

... The rate of EO-CRC has almost doubled since the early 1990s with the widespread use of screening tests, leading to a decrease in overall CRC incidence (3,4). The liver metastasis (LM) rate among patients with CRC generally ranges from 17% to 26.5% (5,6). The liver is also the primary site of metastasis in patients with EO-CRC compared to CRC. ...

Constructing a prognostic model for colorectal cancer with synchronous liver metastases after preoperative chemotherapy: a study based on SEER and an external validation cohort

Clinical and Translational Oncology

... In a univariate analysis, the risk score and TNM stage emerged as significant predictors of survival in gastric cancer patients (P < 0.001) (Fig. 6F); furthermore, multivariate analysis indicated a statistically significant correlation (P < 0.001) between the risk score, age, and survival, even after controlling for other variables (Fig. 6G). We compared our own model to 14 other published GC models to better highlight its predictive capability [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31]. When compared to other models, ours has a higher C-index (Fig. 6H). ...

Development and verification of a manganese metabolism- and immune-related genes signature for prediction of prognosis and immune landscape in gastric cancer