Xianghui Liang’s research while affiliated with South China University of Technology and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (52)


Synthesis of Ni─Ni3S2 mesh/BMOF a) Schematic illustration of Ni─Ni3S2 mesh/BMOF synthesis. b,d) XRD spectra of Ni─Ni3S2 (b), MIL‐101 (Cr), and BMOF (d). c,e) XPS spectra of Ni─Ni3S2 mesh in S 2p and Ni 2p regions (c), and BMOF in Cr 2p and C 1s regions (e). f) Digital photographs of Ni mesh, Ni─Ni3S2 mesh, and Ni─Ni3S2 mesh/BMOF. g,h) SEM image of Ni─Ni3S2 mesh (g) and its corresponding EDS elemental mapping (h). i) SEM image of BMOF.
Water adsorption ability of Ni─Ni3S2 mesh/BMOF. a) Time‐dependent contact angle to water of BMOF. b,c) Isothermal (b) and static water adsorption (c; 60%RH) curves of MIL‐101 (Cr), BMOF, Ni─Ni3S2/BMOF with different Ni─Ni3S2 structures at 25 °C. d,e) Schematic illustration of water migration channels (d) and different adsorption types (e) of Ni─Ni3S2 mesh/BMOF and Ni─Ni3S2 foil/BMOF. f) Static water adsorption curves of Ni─Ni3S2 mesh/BMOF and Ni─Ni3S2 foil/BMOF with different adsorption types at 25 °C, 60% RH.
Water desorption ability of Ni─Ni3S2 mesh/BMOF. a) Linear fitting for the desorption activation energy of MIL‐101 (Cr) and BMOF. b,d) Photothermal heating (b) and desorption (d) curves of MIL‐101 (Cr), BMOF, and Ni─Ni3S2/BMOF with different Ni─Ni3S2 configurations at 25 °C and 1.0 kW m⁻². c) Schematic illustration of irradiated and shaded Ni─Ni3S2 in Ni─Ni3S2 mesh/BMOF and Ni─Ni3S2 granule/BMOF. e) Heating curves of Ni/BMOF with different Ni structures at 25 °C and 1.0 kW m⁻². f) Schematic illustration of heat conduction in Ni─Ni3S2/BMOF and heat convection from Ni─Ni3S2 to BMOF. g) Desorption curves of BMOF at 25 °C and 1.0 kW m⁻² when L0 were 2.5, 5.0, and 10.0 mm. h) Bar graph of the sorption rates of MIL‐101 (Cr) and BMOF, as well as Ni─Ni3S2/BMOF and Ni/BMOF with different structures. i) Desorption curves of MIL‐101 (Cr) and Ni─Ni3S2 mesh/BMOF at 25 °C (0.6 and 0.8 kW m⁻²).
Heat transfer simulation of Ni─Ni3S2 mesh/BMOF. a) Infrared thermal images of Ni─Ni3S2 mesh/BMOF (upper) and MIL‐101 (Cr) (lower) at 25 °C and 1.0 kW m⁻². b) TG curves of BMOF and Ni─Ni3S2 mesh/BMOF. c) Schematic diagram of the meshed model of Ni─Ni3S2 mesh/BMOF. d) Experimental and simulated temperature curves of Surface 2 in Ni─Ni3S2 mesh/BMOF and their deviations. e) Simulated temperature cloud maps of Contour 1 and Contour 2 in Ni─Ni3S2 mesh/BMOF.
Stability of Ni─Ni3S2 mesh/BMOF. a) Cyclic dynamic water adsorption–desorption curve of Ni─Ni3S2 mesh/BMOF. b) Schematic diagram of the chamber with airflow. c) Daily water release curves of sorbents at 25 °C and 60%RH.
Enhancing Atmospheric Water Harvesting of MIL‐101 (Cr) MOF Sorbent with Rapid Desorption Enabled by Ni─Ni3S2 Photothermal Bridge
  • Article
  • Full-text available

September 2024

·

101 Reads

·

3 Citations

Weicheng Chen

·

Yangxi Liu

·

Bolin Xu

·

[...]

·

Sai Kishore Ravi

Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) have emerged as leading candidates for atmospheric water harvesting (AWH). Despite their high water uptake capacity, challenges persist in effective solar‐driven desorption for water collection. Addressing this, a photothermal bridge is introduced by in situ growth of Ni₃S₂ coating on a thermally conductive nickel mesh, enhancing heat transfer to the MOF and accelerating desorption kinetics. MIL‐101 (Cr) MOF in bulk form (BMOF) is bonded to the lightweight Ni─Ni3S2 mesh using adhesive, forming a dual‐layer Ni─Ni₃S₂ mesh/BMOF assembly. This hybrid retains a high water uptake of ≈0.63 g g⁻¹ at 60% relative humidity (RH) with superior sorption kinetics. Photothermally driven heat transfer from Ni─Ni₃S₂ to BMOF achieves complete water desorption within 40 min under 1 kW m⁻². Compared to other configurations like foil, granules, and foam, the mesh‐based hybrid has the highest single‐cycle adsorption–desorption kinetic of 3.18 × 10⁻³ g g⁻¹ min⁻¹. Additionally, the hybrid demonstrates exceptional hydrothermal stability over 50 cycles and maintains morphological stability with airflow, ensuring consistent performance. Heat transfer simulations confirm the thermal distribution across the Ni─Ni₃S₂ mesh/BMOF, corroborating the rapid and uniform desorption. This approach paves the way for efficient AWH in high‐RH, water‐scarce regions by enhancing desorption kinetics through solar energy.

Download




The preparation process of CuxS‐Cu/Al‐MOF a) Schematic illustration of the formation of CuxS‐Cu/Al‐MOF. b) The growth schematic illustration of multilayered MOF on Al foil. c) XPS spectra of Al 2p, C 1s, and O 1s regions in MOF layer. d) XRD spectra of CuxS and MOF layers. e) SEM images of CuxS and MOF layers. f) SEM image of CuxS‐Cu/Al‐MOF and its corresponding EDS elemental mapping.
The H2O vapor adsorption ability of CuxS‐Cu/Al‐MOF. a,b) Pore size distributions (a) and N2 adsorption‐desorption curves (b) of MOF and CuxS‐Cu/Al‐MOF. c) Time‐dependent contact angles to H2O of MOF layer. d) Water adsorption isotherms of MOF and CuxS‐Cu/Al‐MOF. e) Dynamic H2O vapor adsorption curves of CuxS‐Cu/Al‐MOF.
Photothermal conversion ability of CuxS‐Cu/Al‐MOF. a) UV–vis–NIR light adsorption spectra of CuxS and MOF. b–d) Time‐dependent temperature curves (b) and IR thermal imaging images (c,d) of MOF and CuxS‐Cu/Al‐MOF at 1 sun illumination. e) Schematic diagram of experimental set‐up for the test of photothermal conversion efficiency. f) Time‐dependent temperature curves of samples in the set‐up. g,h) Time‐dependent H2O desorption curves of CuxS‐Cu/Al‐MOF and powdery MOF at different temperatures (g), and 1 sun illumination (h).
Practical application of CuxS‐Cu/Al‐MOF. a) Cycling performances of CuxS‐Cu/Al‐MOF. b) Digital photograph of the device set‐up. c,d) Schematic illustrations of the device(c) structure and the function (d) of the AWG. e) Time‐dependent temperature (T) and RH curves inside the AWG with CuxS‐Cu/Al‐MOF and MOF. f) An image of the generated H2O in the AWG with CuxS‐Cu/Al‐MOF and MOF for 120 min.
A Functionally Asymmetric Janus Hygro‐Photothermal Hybrid for Atmospheric Water Harvesting in Arid Regions

February 2024

·

32 Reads

·

4 Citations

Metal‐organic frameworks (MOFs) are high‐performance adsorbents for atmospheric water harvesting but have poor water‐desorption ability, requiring excess energy input to release the trapped water. Addressing this issue, a Janus‐structured adsorbent with functional asymmetry is presented. The material exhibits contrasting functionalities on either face – a hygroscopic face interfaced with a photothermal face. Hygroscopic aluminum fumarate MOF and photothermal CuxS layers are in‐situ grown on opposite sides of a Cu/Al bimetallic substrate, resulting in a CuxS‐Cu/Al‐MOF Janus hygro‐photothermal hybrid. The two faces serve as independent “factories” for photothermal conversion and water adsorption‐desorption respectively, while the interfacing bimetallic layer serves as a “heat conveyor belt” between them. Due to the high porosity and hydrophilicity of the MOF, the hybrid exhibits a water‐adsorption capacity of 0.161 g g⁻¹ and a fast adsorption rate (saturation within 52 min) at 30% relative humidity. Thanks to the photothermal CuxS, the hybrid can reach 71.5 °C under 1 Sun in 20 min and desorb 97% adsorbed water in 40 min, exhibiting a high photothermal conversion efficiency of over 90%. CuxS‐Cu/Al‐MOF exhibits minimal fluctuations after 200 cycles, and its water‐generation capacity is 3.21 times that of powdery MOF in 3 h in a self‐designed prototype in one cycle.




FESEM images of a) Al‐fumarare, b) MIL‐88A, and c) BMOF(3). d) PXRD patterns of five MOFs consisting of different ratios of Al‐fumarate and MIL‐88A. e) Specific surface distribution of five obtained MOFs. f) Pore size distribution of five obtained MOFs. g) Survey XPS spectrums of I) Al‐fumarate, II) BMOF(3), III) BMOF(5), IV) BMOF(7), and V) MIL‐88A. h) The crystal structure of BMOF(3).
a) Water adsorption isotherms of Al‐fumarate, BMOF(3), BMOF(5), BMOF(7), and MIL‐88A. b) Schematic illustration of BMOF(3) capturing water molecules and storing them in the pore structure. c) Kinetic plots of water vapor diffusion at 25 °C and 30% RH. d) Kinetic plots of water vapor diffusion at 25 °C and 60% RH. e) Kinetic plots of water vapor diffusion at 25 °C and 90% RH. f) TG curve of Al‐fumarate, BMOF(3) and MIL‐88A. g) Derivative thermogravimetry (DTG) curve of Al‐fumarate, BMOF(3) and MIL‐88A. h) Comparison of water vapor sorption rate for the designed BMOF(3) and other potential MOFs under arid (RH ≤ 30%), humid (RH = 30–60%), and fog regions (RH = 60–90%).
a) Schematic diagram of the design strategy for the preparation of PGF‐BMOF by bottom‐up assembly technique. b) FESEM image of GF. c) FESEM image of PGF. d–f) FESEM images of PGF‐BMOF at different magnifications. g) HAADF‐SEM corresponding elemental mapping images of PGF‐BMOF. h) PXRD patterns of GF, PGF, BMOF(3), and PGF‐BMOF. i) N2 adsorption/desorption isotherms of powdery BMOF(3) and PGF‐BMOF. Insets represent practical images of the respective samples.
a) Water adsorption isotherm of PGF‐BMOF. b) Water uptake rate of PGF‐BMOF at 25 °C and RHs of 30%, 60%, and 90%. c) Schematic illustration of the vapor‐out processes of PGF‐BMOF under sunlight irradiation. d) The water adsorption/desorption cycle of BMOF(3) and PGF‐BMOF at 25 °C and 90% RH for 2 h, where water desorption occurs at 70 °C for 1 h). e) The UV–vis–NIR absorption spectrum of GF, PGF, and PGF‐BMOF. f) Time‐correlated temperature evolution of different samples under one sun irradiation (100 mW cm⁻²). g) Water desorption of PGF‐BMOF under different light intensities. h) Infrared images of PGF‐BMOF placed under one sunlight irradiation after different times.
a) Photograph of BMOF‐based module fabricated using honeycomb‐like GF. b) FESEM image of BMOF‐based module fabricated using honeycomb‐like GF. c) EDS spectra of BMOF‐based module. d) Digital photo of the exquisite water‐harvesting equipment in the outdoor environment. e) A transport and condensation of released water from BMOF in the equipment. f) Digital photos showing the water desorption process in the AWH device under natural sunlight. g) Water harvesting in 24 h under natural environment humidity. h) Quality assessment of the collected water.
Bimetallic MOF‐Derived Solar‐Triggered Monolithic Adsorbent for Enhanced Atmospheric Water Harvesting

July 2023

·

44 Reads

·

17 Citations

The development of economical, energy‐saving, and efficient metal‐organic framework (MOF)‐based adsorbents for atmospheric water collection is highly imperative for the rapid advancement of renewable freshwater resource exploitation. Herein, a feasible one‐step solvothermal formation strategy of bimetallic MOF (BMOF) is proposed and applied to construct a solar‐triggered monolithic adsorbent for enhanced atmospheric water collection. Benefiting from the reorganization and adjustment of topology structure by Al atoms and Fe atoms, the resultant BMOF(3) consisting of Al‐fumarate and MIL‐88A has a higher specific surface area (1202.99 m² g⁻¹) and pore volume (0.51 cm³ g⁻¹), thereby outperforming the parental MOFs and other potential MOFs in absorbing water. Expanding upon this finding, the solar‐triggered monolithic adsorbent is further developed through a bottom‐up assembly of polyaniline/chitosan layers and hybridized BMOF(3) skeletons on a glass fiber support. The resultant monolithic adsorbent exhibits superior sorption‐desorption kinetics, leading to directional water transport and rapid solar‐assisted vapor diffusion. As a proof‐of‐concept demonstration, an exquisite water harvester is constructed to emphasize a high water yield of 1.19 g g⁻¹ per day of the designed monolithic adsorbent. Therefore, the design and validation of bimetallic MOF‐derived solar‐triggered adsorbent in this work are expected to provide a reference for the large‐scale applications of MOF‐based atmospheric water harvesting.




Citations (46)


... It harnesses the capabilities of porous materials that can extract water molecules from the air even in low-humidity environments, thus making it feasible to operate in arid zones [9]. To date, only a handful of designable Metal-Organic Frameworks (MOFs) have proven effective in augmenting the AWH technique [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. In contrast to other reviews or perspectives that focus on enumerating various adsorbent materials or delving into the thermal engineering aspects of assisted AWH, this perspective focuses on the progress of MOFs within assisted AWH and suggests that MOFs have the potential to emerge as the most cost-effective and efficient method for providing fresh water. ...

Reference:

Metal–Organic Framework-Assisted Atmospheric Water Harvesting Enables Cheap Clean Water Available in an Arid Climate: A Perspective
Enhancing Atmospheric Water Harvesting of MIL‐101 (Cr) MOF Sorbent with Rapid Desorption Enabled by Ni─Ni3S2 Photothermal Bridge

... Metal-Organic Frameworks (MOFs) constitute a class of crystalline porous materials, characterized by metal ions or clusters as nodes and organic ligands as linkers [46][47][48][49][50][51][52]. The design flexibility of MOFs holds promise for their application in assisted AWH [26,28,53]. ...

A Functionally Asymmetric Janus Hygro‐Photothermal Hybrid for Atmospheric Water Harvesting in Arid Regions

... A higher initial temperature can affect the apparent melting point by causing the PCM to reach its phase change state more quickly, which may slightly shift the observed melting point due to kinetic effects [46][47][48]. Additionally, the thermal conductivity is influenced by the initial temperature, as higher temperatures generally increase the kinetic energy of molecules, enhancing their ability to transfer heat [49]. This improved heat transfer capability results in higher thermal conductivity, facilitating more efficient energy distribution within the PCM [50]. ...

Myristic acid-tetradecanol-capric acid ternary eutectic/SiO2/MIL-100(Fe) as phase change humidity control material for indoor temperature and humidity control
  • Citing Article
  • December 2023

Journal of Energy Storage

... Both the isotherms (Fig. 10) and QE-TPDA profiles (Fig. 11) reveal complex patterns of adsorption and desorption of water, with four distinct steps and substantial hysteresis. This behavior is different from that reported by Luo et al. [32], who observed a three-step adsorption isotherm, with a considerably lower saturation sorption capacity of 340 mg/g. Although MIL-88 A has been known since 2005, we could not find any other reports on water sorption in this material. ...

Bimetallic MOF‐Derived Solar‐Triggered Monolithic Adsorbent for Enhanced Atmospheric Water Harvesting

... Zhongbao Liu et al. [36] introduced a composite phase change heat storage material for radiant floor heating, achieving a balance between heating comfort and economic efficiency, making it a promising solution for building energy efficiency. Weicheng Chen et al. [37] evaluated the use of macro-encapsulated phase change material in radiant floor heating systems, with optimization of thermal conductivities and input power further enhancing efficiency by reducing daily electricity costs and increasing comfort time ratio compared to systems without PCM. ...

Experimental and numerical investigations on radiant floor heating system integrated with macro-encapsulated phase change material
  • Citing Article
  • July 2023

Energy

... When exposed to sunlight, it releases its maximum adsorbed water entirely within 90 min, completing a single sorption−desorption cycle within 210 min. Luo et al. 98 introduced a holistic approach that entailed constructing tiers of chitosan/polydopamine and hybrid MOF structures onto a glass fiber base, resulting in a multifunctional monolithic adsorbent. Notably, in dry climates (RH ≤ 30%), this MOF exhibited higher moisture adsorption capacity (0.44 g/g) compared to its parent MOF. ...

High-efficient and scalable solar-driven MOF-based water collection unit: From module design to concrete implementation
  • Citing Article
  • April 2023

Chemical Engineering Journal

... Optimal composition (23 % wt TiO 2 @AlCl3-Fuma) yields 24.5 % higher water vapor harvesting at low pressure (0.2 P/P0) at 25 • C and increased UV light absorption across full-wave bands. Luo et al. (2022) designed a stable monolithic water-adsorbent for efficient atmospheric water utilization in arid climates, using CGF-mixed-MOFs(Al) on functionalized glass fiber paper. The mixed-MOFs(Al) monolith exhibits superior water harvesting and faster adsorption kinetics at low humidity, offering more active adsorption sites than CGF-MIL-160(Al) and CGF-Al-fumarate. ...

Two-linker MOFs-based glass fiber paper monolithic adsorbent for atmospheric water harvesting in arid climates
  • Citing Article
  • August 2022

Journal of Cleaner Production

... 162 It was later reported that the photothermocatalysis could dramatically enhance the H 2 production rates. 163,164 Photo-thermocatalytic materials are a complex of two different types of materials that ideally have to possess fullspectrum light harvesting ability, effective photo-to-thermal conversion, and abundant active sites. Some of the materials that can be utilised are the inorganic semiconductors, plasmonic metals, metal-organic framework catalysts and even polymers. ...

High-performance macro-encapsulated composite for photothermal conversion and latent heat storage
  • Citing Article
  • November 2022

Journal of Energy Storage

... The adsorption phenomenon has been known for more than a century and since its discovery, it has served in many applications, including air purification [1], recovery of nutrients [2], detection of chemicals [3], humidity removal [4], purification of fuels [5,6], solar energy conversion [7], wastewater treatment [8] and water purification [9] among others. Adsorption is a mass transfer process whose driving force is the difference of concentration between adsorbate in the fluid (liquid or gas) and solid (adsorbent surface) phases [10]. ...

Solar-driven smart ceramic fiber-based monolithic adsorbent for autonomous indoor humidity control
  • Citing Article
  • December 2022

Chemical Engineering Journal

... 131 An effective combination of PCMs and photoresponsive materials can integrate photothermal conversion, energy storage, and heat release. 132 In the presence of sunlight, photothermal materials initiate the light-to-heat conversion, raising the temperature to a higher value than the transition temperature of the PCM. Then, the PCM absorbs significant heat energy through its phase change and stores it as latent heat. ...

Phase Change Composite with Core–Shell Structure for Photothermal Conversion and Thermal Energy Storage
  • Citing Article
  • July 2022

ACS Applied Energy Materials