William R. Lenderking’s research while affiliated with Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute and other places

Background The total burden of migraine includes not only the episodes with headache pain but extends throughout the interictal periods. Interictal symptoms and associated psychological responses may profoundly impact well-being and drive treatment-seeking behavior. Methods A cross-sectional online survey was conducted with participants aged ≥ 18 years, 250 with episodic migraine (EM) and 250 with chronic migraine (CM), having ≥ 4 monthly migraine headache days. All were naïve to galcanezumab or began ≤ 6 months before survey completion. The study evaluated factors associated with the Migraine Interictal Burden Scale (MIBS-4), including social determinants of health and well-being. Multiple linear regression, logistic regression, and random forests (RF) were used to explore predictors of MIBS-4. Results The majority of participants (90%) were female with a mean (standard deviation) age of 40.6 (± 12.0) years and 18.1 (± 12.7) years since the first migraine episode. Sociodemographically, the EM and CM groups were similar. Common comorbidities were anxiety disorder (45%) and depression (44%). Migraine family history was reported in 59% of participants. MIBS-4 was correlated with a number of diverse variables, including well-being, anxiety sensitivity, income, aura symptoms, and the worst migraine pain in the year before starting galcanezumab. Linear and logistic regression identified years since the first symptom, worst migraine attack pain, premonitory symptoms, and income as significant predictors. RF explained more of the variance than multiple linear regression and introduced additional concepts to the prediction of MIBS, identifying well-being (WHO-5 total score), the WHO-5 item “cheerful and in good spirits,” worry about exercise, and fear of missing social obligations as significant predictors. Socioeconomic status and income were also critical explanatory variables for interictal burden (IIB) based on regression modeling and RF. Still, income was the only variable significantly associated with IIB across regression and RF methods. Conclusions Interictal burden should be considered in the medical care of people with migraine. This additional burden is holistic, with psychosocial and socioeconomic elements in addition to residual symptoms. It is essential to consider this when assessing the impact of IIB.

Migraine is under-diagnosed and under-treated. Many people with migraine do not seek medical care, and those who do may initially receive a different diagnosis and/or be dissatisfied with provided care on their journey before treatment with a CGRP-mAb (calcitonin-gene-related-peptide monoclonal antibody). This is a cross-sectional, self-reported, online survey of subjects in Lilly’s Emgality® Patient Support Program in 2022. Questionnaires collected insights into subjects’ prior experiences with migraine and interactions with healthcare professionals before receiving CGRP-mAbs. Of the 250 participants with episodic and 250 with chronic migraine, 90% were female and white with a mean age of 26.2 years (± 11.9) at diagnosis and 40.6 (± 12.0) years at survey enrollment. Many participants (71%) suspected they had migraine before diagnosis, with 31% reluctant to seek help. Of these, approximately one-third were unaware of treatment, did not think that a physician could do anything more for migraine, would not take them seriously, or were reluctant due to a previous unhelpful experience. Participants mainly received information from friends/family (47%) or the internet (28%). Participants initially sought treatment due to an increase in migraine frequency (77%), attacks interfering with work or school (75%), or increased pain intensity (74%). Subjects saw a mean of 4.1 (± 4.3) healthcare providers before migraine diagnosis, and 20% of participants previously received a different diagnosis. Participants reported migraine causes included stress/anxiety/depression (42%), hormonal changes (30%), nutrition (20%), and weather (16%). Acute treatment of migraine included prescription (82%) and over-the-counter (50%) medications, changes in nutrition (62%), adjusting fluid intake (56%), and relaxation techniques (55%). Preventive medications included anticonvulsants (61%), antidepressants (44%), blood pressure-lowering medications (43%), and botulinum toxin A injections (17%). Most discontinuations were due to lack of efficacy or side effects. People with migraine describe reluctance in seeking health care, and misunderstandings seem common especially in the beginning of their migraine journey. Graphical abstract available for this article.

Background Health‐related quality of life (HRQL) is an important goal for patients with major depressive disorder (MDD), but whether antidepressants improve HRQL in these patients is unclear. Here, we describe the real‐world effects of trazodone once‐a‐day (TzOAD) and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) treatments on HRQL and functioning in adults with MDD. Methods This 8‐week prospective, observational, open‐label, multicenter study was conducted in adults with moderate or severe MDD for whom TzOAD or SSRI were prescribed as monotherapy. The primary outcome was life enjoyment and satisfaction assessed via the patient‐reported Quality‐of‐Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire Short Form (Q‐LES‐Q‐SF) from baseline to week 8. Secondary outcomes included change in Q‐LES‐Q‐SF from baseline to weeks 1 and 2; severity of depressive symptoms using the Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and sleep disturbance via the PROMIS SF‐SD 8b questionnaire at weeks 1, 2, and 8; and overall functioning via the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS), hedonic capacity using the Snaith–Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS), and cognitive dysfunction using the Perceived Deficits Questionnaire (PDQ‐5) at baseline and week 8. Results The study included 208 adults with MDD (mean [SD] age = 50.2 [14.3] years; 68.6% female; 98.4% White). Life enjoyment and satisfaction improved from baseline to week 8 for both treatment groups: Q‐LES‐Q‐SF mean (SD) scores were 27.5 (20.4) for the SSRI group and 39.0 (22.1) for the TzOAD group. Depressive symptoms and sleep disturbances also reduced from baseline to week 8: MADRS (SSRI, −15.7 [8.3]; TzOAD, −21.0 [9.8]); PROMIS SF‐SD 8b (SSRI, −9.9 [12.6]; TzOAD, −22.0 [12.6]). Mean change scores in Q‐LES‐Q‐SF, MADRS, and PROMIS SF‐SD 8b improved as early as week 1 in both groups. Mean scores also improved from baseline to week 8 on SDS (SSRI, −9.2 [7.4]; TzOAD, −14.3 [7.5]), SHAPS (SSRI, −6.6 [4.3]; TzOAD, −8.3 [4.4]), and PDQ‐5 (SSRI, −5.8 [4.5]; TzOAD, −7.7 [5.0]). Conclusions In adults with MDD who received TzOAD or SSRIs, overall and individual HQRL domains improved rapidly and in parallel with improvements in depressive symptoms, with a slightly greater improvement observed in the TzOAD group.

Background The Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) is a widely used measure of insomnia severity. Various ISI research findings suggest different factor solutions and meaningful within-individual change (MWIC) to detect treatment response in patients with insomnia. This study examined an ISI factor solution and psychometric indices to define MWIC in a robust patient sample from clinical trial settings. Methods We endeavored to improve upon previous validation of ISI by examining structural components of confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) models using two large, placebo-controlled clinical trials of lemborexant for insomnia. Using the best-fitting two-factor solution, we evaluated anchor-based, distribution-based and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve methods to derive an estimate of the MWIC. Results The model structure for the 7-item scale proposed in other research did not fit the observed data from our two lemborexant clinical trials (N = 1956) as well as a two-factor solution based on 6 items did. Using triangulation of anchor-based, distribution-based, and ROC methods, we determined that a 5-point reduction using 6 items best represented a clinically meaningful improvement in individuals with insomnia in our patient sample. Conclusions A 6-item two-factor scale had better psychometric properties than the 7-item scale in this patient sample. On the 6-item scale, a reduction of 5 points in the ISI total score represented the MWIC. Generalizability of the proposed MWIC may be limited to patient populations with similar demographic and clinical characteristics. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41687-024-00744-6.

Background Cognitive impairment associated with schizophrenia (CIAS) represents a distinct, persistent, and core group of schizophrenia symptoms. Cognitive symptoms have been shown to have an impact on quality of life. There are several published CIAS measures, but none based on direct patient self-report. It is important to capture the patient’s perspective to supplement performancebased outcome measures of cognition to provide a complete picture of the patient’s experience. This paper describes additional validation work on the Patient-Reported Experience of Cognitive Impairment in Schizophrenia (PRECIS) instrument. Methods Data from two large, international, pharmaceutical clinical trials in medically and psychiatrically stable English-speaking patients with schizophrenia and 88 healthy controls were analyzed. An exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted in one trial ( n = 215), using the original 35-item PRECIS. The factor structure suggested by EFA was further evaluated using item response theory (IRT; Samejima’s graded response model), and tested using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Both EFA and CFA results were tested in a second trial with similar inclusion/exclusion characteristics ( n = 410). Additional statistical properties were evaluated in healthy controls. Results EFA suggested that the best solution after item reduction suggested a factor structure of 6 factors based on 26 items (memory, communication, self-control, executive function, attention, sharpness of thought), supporting a total score, with an additional 2-item bother score (28 items in all). IRT analysis indicated the items were well-ordered within each domain. The CFA demonstrated excellent model fit, accounting for 69% of the variance. The statistical properties of the 28-item version of the PRECIS were confirmed in the second trial. Evidence for internal consistency and test-retest reliability was robust. Known-groups validity was supported by comparison of healthy controls with patients with schizophrenia. Correlations indicated moderate associations between PRECIS and functioning instruments like the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS), but weak correlations with performance-based outcomes like MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB). Discussion Using two clinical trial samples, we identified a robust factor structure for the PRECIS and were able to replicate it in the second sample. Evaluation of the meaningful score difference (MSD) should be repeated in future studies, as these samples did not show enough change for it to be evaluated. Conclusions This analysis provides strong evidence for the reliability and validity of the PRECIS, a 28-item, patient-reported instrument to assess cognitive impairment associated with schizophrenia. The correlation with functioning and the weak correlation with performance on cognitive tasks suggests that patient reports of cognitive impairment measure a unique aspect of patient experience.

CONCLUSION Alpha (α)- and beta (β)-thalassemia are inherited red blood cell disorders with a wide spectrum of symptoms, functional manifestations, and disease burden. The standard of care for α- and -β-thalassemia major is regular transfusions and iron chelation therapy. However, symptoms may persist despite treatment. Patients with non-transfusion dependent (NTD) thalassemia are historically considered to have less severe disease than patients who are transfusion-dependent (TD), yet they may experience considerable disease burden negatively affecting their health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Additionally, little is known about the HRQoL of α- thalassemia patients, of whom a majority are NTD. This qualitative research study sought to understand the patient perspective of disease burden experienced with these disorders and explore any differences that might be related to genotype of thalassemia (α or β) or transfusion requirements. Twenty-six adult participants (13 α, 13 β) who have made no changes to their thalassemia treatment for at least 6 months were interviewed about symptoms, impact, quality of life, and transfusion-dependence in a cross-sectional, non-interventional qualitative study. There were 8 males and 18 females; 18 were TD (5 α and 13 β) and 8 were NTD (all α). Symptoms and their impact were elicited via open-ended, semi-structured interviews. Symptom severity and bothersomeness were rated by participants on a 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS) with 0 meaning no severity or bothersomeness, and 10 meaning extreme severity or bothersomeness. Frequency of participants reporting each symptom during the interview were calculated as a percent of the total participants in each group. Mean symptom severity and bothersomeness among participants reporting the symptom were calculated from responses to the 0-10 NRS. The results were then presented for α- and β-thalassemia, and for TD and NTD groupings of the 26 participants.All participants provided informed consent and all interviews were audio recorded and transcribed for analysis. The most frequently reported symptoms among all participants were fatigue (100%), weakness (73%), shortness of breath (69%) and difficulty focusing (73%). Mean severity and bothersomeness scores for these 4 symptoms were generally similar across genotype and transfusion status, with mean severity scores for all participants ranging from 6.6 to 7.8, and mean bothersomeness scores ranging from 6.9 to 8.0 (Figures 1 and 2). Pain was reported by all groups but more frequently by TD than NTD (72% vs 50%) and β- compared to α-thalassemia participants (77% vs 54%). Pain bothersome ratings ranged from 6.4 to 8.7 indicating many of these patients are bothered or distressed by the symptom. Other frequently described and bothersome symptoms included difficulty with focused attention and memory (6 to 7.5 across all subgroups), as well as headaches (>6 across all subgroups) Nearly half of the participants (12/26, 46%) reported considerable impact on their function and daily activities regardless of transfusion status or genotype, and a majority (14/26, 54%) reported having to make lifestyle changes because of their thalassemia. The most frequently reported limitations were physical activities, along with interference in sport and leisure activities. More than half of participants (18/26, 69%) reported emotional challenges (including being stigmatized) and having difficulty getting quality sleep. Patients with α-NTDT and α-TD reported a similar degree of symptoms and impact on their HRQoL as patients with β-TDT, despite a historical perception of α-thalassemia as a more benign disease. The fact that many symptoms were commonly reported and were similarly severe and bothersome in both NTDT and TDT, and in both α- and β-thalassemia, suggests that patients with thalassemia are negatively impacted by their disease, regardless of transfusion dependency and genotype. Although the small sample size of this qualitative study precludes any statistical inference, the findings describe the patient experience of thalassemia and helps to inform the development of patient-relevant endpoints for future clinical trials. Additional research is needed to explore the relationship between these symptoms/HRQoL impact and clinical/pathophysiologic correlates.

Purpose: Spasticity is common in multiple sclerosis (MS), often leading to functional limitations and disability. We developed a conceptual model of spasticity in MS integrating expert opinion, recent literature, and experiences of clinicians and people with MS spasticity. Methods: A conceptual model was developed based on a targeted literature review of articles published between 2014 and 2019, followed by input from clinicians, then input from participants with MS spasticity. Multidisciplinary experts on spasticity provided guidance at each step. Results: Key concepts of the integrated spasticity conceptual model included: moderators; triggers; modifiers; treatment; objective manifestations; subjective experience; physical, functional, social, and emotional/psychological impacts; and long-term consequences. Participants with MS spasticity most frequently endorsed spasms, tightness, and pain as descriptors of spasticity. Some participants with MS spasticity had difficulty distinguishing spasticity from other MS symptoms (e.g. muscle weakness). Some triggers, emotional/psychological impacts, and long-term consequences of spasticity reported by participants with MS spasticity were not previously identified in the published literature. Conclusions: This conceptual model of spasticity, integrating published literature with the experience of clinicians, people with MS spasticity, and experts, demonstrates the complex, multidimensional nature of MS spasticity. This model may be used to improve clinician-patient dialogue, research, and patient care.

The novel mechanisms of action (MOA) derived from some recently introduced molecular targets have led to regulatory approvals for rapid acting antidepressants (RAADs) that can generate responses within hours or days, rather than weeks or months. These novel targets include the N-methyl-D-glutamate receptor antagonist ketamine, along with its enantiomers and various derivatives, and the allosteric modulators of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptors. There has also been a strong resurgence in interest in psychedelic compounds that impact a range of receptor sites including D1, 5-HT7, KOR, 5-HT5A, Sigma-1, NMDA, and BDNF. The RAADs developed from these novel targets have enabled successful treatment for difficult to treat depressed individuals and has generated a new wave of innovation in research and treatment. Despite the advances in the neurobiology and clinical treatment of mood disorders, we are still using rating instruments that were created decades ago for drugs from a different era (e.g., The Hamilton and Montgomery-Åsberg depression rating scales, HDRS, and MADRS) continue to be used. These rating instruments were designed to assess mood symptoms over a 7-day time frame. Consequently, the use of these rating instruments often requires modifications to address items that cannot be assessed in short time frames, such as the sleep and appetite items. This review describes the adaptative approaches that have been made with the existing scales to meet this need and examines additional domains such as daily activities, side effects, suicidal ideation and behavior, and role functioning. Recommendations for future studies are described, including the challenges related to implementation of these adapted measures and approaches to mitigation.