William R. Jarvis’s research while affiliated with University of Montana and other places

Background: Alcohol-based hand rubs (ABHRs) are the primary form of hand hygiene in healthcare settings globally. Many developed countries, and most US hospitals utilize wall-mounted ABHR dispensers throughout the facility. The adoption of automated touch-free dispensers is increasing. However, data on the efficacy of ABHRs when used at dispensed amounts are limited. The evidence is strong, showing that formulation matters (not just alcohol concentration) and that agent volume impacts efficacy. Objective: We evaluated the efficacy of ABHR foams on human hands using 2 controlled test methods at variable volumes (ie, typical doses and realistic volumes that healthcare personnel could use in patient care practice). Methods: We tested 8 commercially available ABHR products, the WHO hand-rub formulation, (P1–P9) and a nonantibacterial foam handwash control (P10) on human participants at 2 different application frequencies (“1 application” and “10 applications”) using 2 different ASTM test methods (E1174 and E2755). Studies using ASTM-E1174 evaluated 3 different application volumes (0.7 mL, 1.1 mL, and 2.0 mL) of the 10 products, each tested on 12–13 subjects. Studies using ASTM-E2755 evaluated a single 1.1 mL volume for the 9 ABHR products (P1–P9), each on 2–12 subjects. A linear mixed-effects model was fit separately to log reductions with random effects for subject and date, and a fixed effect for product. Results: Four different foam formulations (P1–P4) consistently outperformed all other formulations by the E1174 method, especially with increasing volumes and after 10 product applications (Fig. 1). When tested with E2755, all formulations performed similarly, with only P1 and P2 differentiating after 10 applications (Fig. 2). ABHR efficacy consistently increased with larger application volumes, whereas the handwash control (P10) achieved a similar efficacy (∼2 log reduction) at all volumes. Efficacy for some ABHR formulations increased, whereas others decreased with repeated applications. Alcohol concentration did not correlate with log reduction. Conclusions: Formulation and the product application volume affect the antimicrobial efficacy of ABHR; therefore, those data should be critically assessed by healthcare personnel assessing ABHR product performance. Test methods matter: when E1174 was used, greater differentiation between formulations was observed. This may be due to the larger contamination volume and greater soil load used in E1174. Funding: GOJO Industries, Inc., provided Funding: for this study. Disclosures: James W. Arbogast and David R. Macinga report salary from GOJO Industries.

As providers of frontline clinical care for patients with acute and potentially life-threatening infections, emergency departments (EDs) have the priorities of saving lives and providing care quickly and efficiently. Although these facilities see a diversity of patients 24 hours per day and can collect prospective data in real time, their ability to conduct timely research on infectious syndromes is not well recognized. EMERGEncy ID NET is a national network that demonstrates that EDs can also collect data and conduct research in real time. This network collaborates with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and other partners to study and address a wide range of infectious diseases and clinical syndromes. In this paper, we review selected highlights of EMERGEncy ID NET’s history from 1995 to 2017. We focus on the establishment of this multisite research network and the network’s collaborative research on a wide range of ED clinical topics.

Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of a multimodal hand hygiene intervention program in reducing health care insurance claims for hygiene preventable infections (eg, cold and influenza), absenteeism, and subjective impact on employees. Methods: A 13.5-month prospective, randomized cluster controlled trial was executed with alcohol-based hand sanitizer in strategic workplace locations and personal use (intervention group) and brief hand hygiene education (both groups). Four years of retrospective data were collected for all participants. Results: Hygiene-preventable health care claims were significantly reduced in the intervention group by over 20% (P < 0.05). Absenteeism was positively impacted overall for the intervention group. Employee survey data showed significant improvements in hand hygiene behavior and perception of company concern for employee well-being. Conclusion: Providing a comprehensive, targeted, yet simple to execute hand hygiene program significantly reduced the incidence of health care claims and increased employee workplace satisfaction.

This article has been retracted: please see Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal (http://www.elsevier.com/locate/withdrawalpolicy). This article has been retracted at the request of the Editor-in-Chief. An investigation into an alleged failure to disclose COI was conducted by an interdisciplinary scientific review committee convened by senior leadership at Georgia Regents University (GRU). The committee reached the findings of a failure to properly disclose the relationship. During the course of that investigation, questions were raised about the methods and data presented in this article. The questions focused in particular on the consistency of the statistics over various study periods as well as the methods by which study sites were chosen. The investigation concluded that the science was flawed.

This was a multicenter, quasiexperimental, 140-month, acute care study comparing central line-associated bloodstream infection rates associated with positive or negative intravenous connectors to a zero fluid displacement connector. A decrease in central line-associated bloodstream infections was found after changing from either negative or positive intravenous connectors to the zero fluid displacement connector (P = .005) with total cost savings of over $3 million.

To determine factors associated with colonization by carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and multiresistant Acinetobacter spp. Surveillance cultures were collected from patients admitted to the intensive care unit at admission, on the third day after admission and weekly until discharge. The outcome was colonization by these pathogens. Two interventions were implemented: education and the introduction of alcohol rubs. Compliance with hand hygiene, colonization pressure, colonization at admission and risk factors for colonization were evaluated. The probability of becoming colonized increased during the study. The incidence density of colonization by carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa and multiresistant Acinetobacter spp. and colonization pressure were different between periods, increasing gradually throughout the study. The increase in colonization pressure was due to patients already colonized at admission. The APACHE II score, colonization pressure in the week before the outcome and male gender were independent risk factors for colonization. Every 1% increase in colonization pressure led to a 2% increase in the risk of being colonized. Colonization pressure is a risk factor for carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa and multiresistant Acinetobacter spp. colonization. When this pressure reaches critical levels, efforts primarily aimed at hand hygiene may not be sufficient to prevent transmission.

This in vitro study's purpose was to assess antibacterial activity of 3 different connectors: V-Link (Baxter, Deerfield, IL), Ultrasite Ag (B. Braun, Bethlehem, PA), and MaxGuard (Medegen/CareFusion, Ontario, CA), impregnated with silver nanoparticles after blood exposure. All 3 silver-coated/impregnated connectors grew Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis. Log reduction of bacteria was not significant (range, +0.19 to -1.82). There was substantial bacterial recovery from all 3 connectors (mean ranges, 2.09 × 10(7) to 4.00 × 10(8)) indicating that, once blood comes in contact with silver-coated/impregnated needleless connectors, their antibacterial activity is significantly reduced.