William C Nelson’s research while affiliated with The Ohio Environmental Protection Agency and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (3)


It's about time: A comparison of Canadian and American time–activity patterns
  • Article

December 2002

·

216 Reads

·

647 Citations

Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology

Judith A Leech

·

William C Nelson

·

Richard T Burnett

·

[...]

·

Mark E Raizenne

This study compares two North American time-activity data bases: the National Human Activity Pattern Survey (NHAPS) of 9386 interviewees in 1992-1994 in the continental USA with the Canadian Human Activity Pattern Survey (CHAPS) of 2381 interviewees in 1996-1997 in four major Canadian cities. Identical surveys and methodology were used to collect this data: random sample telephone selection within the identified telephone exchanges, computer-assisted telephone interviews, overselection of children and weekends in the 24-h recall diary and the same interviewers. Very similar response rates were obtained: 63% (NHAPS) and 64.5% (CHAPS). Results of comparisons by age within major activity and location groups suggest activity and location patterns are very similar (most differences being less than 1% or 14 min in a 24-h day) with the exception of seasonal differences. Canadians spend less time outdoors in winter and less time indoors in summer than their U.S. counterparts. When exposure assessments use time of year or outdoor/indoor exposure gradients, these differences may result in significant differences in exposure assessments. Otherwise, the 24-h time activity patterns of North Americans are remarkably similar and use of the combined data set for some exposure assessments may be feasible.


Figure 1: Pie chart showing the mean percentage of time the NHAPS respondents spent in six different locations on the diary day (weighted). Time spent indoors (composed of time in a residence, in an office or factory, in a bar or restaurant, or in some other indoor location) is represented by lightly shaded slices. The percentages in the figure are the mean percentages taken over individual percentages for people in the NHAPS sample. Individual percentages were calculated from the time spent in each location over the total amount of time spent, which was equal to 24 h (1440 min) for each individual (see Table 6 for the number of doers for each location).
Table 1 . The NHAPS sample sizes and participation rates.
Figure 2: Pie chart showing the mean percentage of time the NHAPS respondents spentwith a smoker in six different locations on the diary day (weighted). Time spent indoors (composed of time in residence, in an office or factory, in a bar or restaurant, or in some other indoor location) is represented by lightly shaded slices. The percentages in the figure are means taken over individual percentages for people in the NHAPS sample that reported being with a smoker for at least 1 min on the diary day (the doers). Individual percentages were calculated as the time spent in the presence of a smoker in each location divided by the total amount of time spent with a smoker (see Table 7 for the total number of doers and the number of doers for each location). (Please see the text for a discussion of SRP — SERD biases inherent in the NHAPS database with respect to the time respondents reported spending with a smoker.)
Table 2 . Summary of factors and question types for versions A and B of the NHAPS questionnaire.
Figure 4: Stacked plot showing the weighted percentage of NHAPS respondents in each of ten different locations according to the time-of-day. The original minute-by-minute diary data have been smoothed for clarification. 

+7

The National Human Activity Pattern Survey (NHAPS): A resource for assessing exposure to environmental pollutants
  • Article
  • Full-text available

March 2001

·

4,153 Reads

·

3,961 Citations

Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology

Because human activities impact the timing, location, and degree of pollutant exposure, they play a key role in explaining exposure variation. This fact has motivated the collection of activity pattern data for their specific use in exposure assessments. The largest of these recent efforts is the National Human Activity Pattern Survey (NHAPS), a 2-year probability-based telephone survey ( n=9386) of exposure-related human activities in the United States (U.S.) sponsored by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The primary purpose of NHAPS was to provide comprehensive and current exposure information over broad geographical and temporal scales, particularly for use in probabilistic population exposure models. NHAPS was conducted on a virtually daily basis from late September 1992 through September 1994 by the University of Maryland's Survey Research Center using a computer-assisted telephone interview instrument (CATI) to collect 24-h retrospective diaries and answers to a number of personal and exposure-related questions from each respondent. The resulting diary records contain beginning and ending times for each distinct combination of location and activity occurring on the diary day (i.e., each microenvironment). Between 340 and 1713 respondents of all ages were interviewed in each of the 10 EPA regions across the 48 contiguous states. Interviews were completed in 63% of the households contacted. NHAPS respondents reported spending an average of 87% of their time in enclosed buildings and about 6% of their time in enclosed vehicles. These proportions are fairly constant across the various regions of the U.S. and Canada and for the California population between the late 1980s, when the California Air Resources Board (CARB) sponsored a state-wide activity pattern study, and the mid-1990s, when NHAPS was conducted. However, the number of people exposed to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) in California seems to have decreased over the same time period, where exposure is determined by the reported time spent with a smoker. In both California and the entire nation, the most time spent exposed to ETS was reported to take place in residential locations.

Download

Citations (3)


... The nine foundations of a healthy building include ventilation, air quality, thermal health, moisture, dust and pests, safety and security, water quality, noise, and lighting and views [71]. With North Americans spending an average of nearly 90% of their time indoors and an additional 6% in an enclosed vehicle, ample occasion exists for direct and indirect contact with chemical and biological sources and reservoirs [72,73]. A wide variety of chemicals from building materials, furnishings, consumer products and other household items can migrate into air or dust becoming a source of exposure [20,74,75]. ...

Reference:

Environmental public health research at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: A blueprint for exposure science in a connected world
The National Human Activity Pattern Survey (NHAPS): A Resource for Assessing Exposure to Environmental Pollutants

... Nowadays, people spend about 90% of their lifetime indoors, where almost all human activities within professional and personal daily life occur. 1 For this reason, a proper building design that considers a human-centered perspective is needed, not only from an occupants' wellbeing standpoint but also from an energy-related concern. 2 Indeed, building operations account for a significant percentage of the total primary energy consumption in many countries: heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) systems need to satisfy the increasing demand for investigate the relationship between IEQ and human wellbeing, highlighting how the first can have both short and long-term impacts on the second. 28,29 At the same time, given the significant role that occupants play in buildings' final operational costs, researchers agree on the economic benefit that a good IEQ can bring, especially in terms of occupancy performance in working environments, overall satisfaction with living spaces, and potential energy consumption reduction. ...

The National Human Activity Pattern Survey (NHAPS): A resource for assessing exposure to environmental pollutants

Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology

... People typically spend about 90% of their time in indoor spaces, and depending on individual context and lifestyle, different proportions of their time are spent in a variety of microenvironments such as home, work, school, and other public and private buildings [20]. The patterns of exposure that take place in different microenvironments and the combined exposure with the mixture of hazardous chemicals that co-exist in the indoor air in each microenvironment can be determinants of IAQ-related health outcomes [21][22][23][24][25]. Thus, efforts targeting a thorough understanding of chemical air pollution patterns in realworld environments are essential for establishing representative risk assessment protocols and effective policies to reduce emissions and protect health. ...

It's about time: A comparison of Canadian and American time–activity patterns
  • Citing Article
  • December 2002

Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology