W.L. Anderson's scientific contributions
What is this page?
This page lists the scientific contributions of an author, who either does not have a ResearchGate profile, or has not yet added these contributions to their profile.
It was automatically created by ResearchGate to create a record of this author's body of work. We create such pages to advance our goal of creating and maintaining the most comprehensive scientific repository possible. In doing so, we process publicly available (personal) data relating to the author as a member of the scientific community.
If you're a ResearchGate member, you can follow this page to keep up with this author's work.
If you are this author, and you don't want us to display this page anymore, please let us know.
It was automatically created by ResearchGate to create a record of this author's body of work. We create such pages to advance our goal of creating and maintaining the most comprehensive scientific repository possible. In doing so, we process publicly available (personal) data relating to the author as a member of the scientific community.
If you're a ResearchGate member, you can follow this page to keep up with this author's work.
If you are this author, and you don't want us to display this page anymore, please let us know.
Publication (1)
This paper examines the utility of 3 different methodologies for estimating Canada goose (Branta canadensis) harvest in 2 quota zones in southern Illinois from 1982 to 1992. For the Southern Illinois Quota Zone (4 counties), daily registration forms xβ = 24,855), the Illinois Waterfowl Hunter Survey (state survey; xβ 25,143), and the U.S. Fish and...
Citations
... The number of light goose hunters (Huntsp), days afield (Dayssp), birds crippled but not retrieved (Cripsp) and harvest (Harvsp) were calculated as follows: The 2022 estimates for number of hunters, days hunted, and light geese harvested were based on 3,100 HIP registrants who reported they hunted during the 2021 LGCO on their 2021-22 HIP registration. Estimated light goose harvest was not adjusted for reporting bias using 0.478 as has been done in previous years (for discussion of this estimator related to waterfowl harvest, see Anderson et al. 1996). Ninety-five percent confidence intervals were calculated for number of hunters, days hunted, and geese harvested, as described in Lischka et al. (2006). ...
