W. Rauh's scientific contributions
What is this page?
This page lists the scientific contributions of an author, who either does not have a ResearchGate profile, or has not yet added these contributions to their profile.
It was automatically created by ResearchGate to create a record of this author's body of work. We create such pages to advance our goal of creating and maintaining the most comprehensive scientific repository possible. In doing so, we process publicly available (personal) data relating to the author as a member of the scientific community.
If you're a ResearchGate member, you can follow this page to keep up with this author's work.
If you are this author, and you don't want us to display this page anymore, please let us know.
It was automatically created by ResearchGate to create a record of this author's body of work. We create such pages to advance our goal of creating and maintaining the most comprehensive scientific repository possible. In doing so, we process publicly available (personal) data relating to the author as a member of the scientific community.
If you're a ResearchGate member, you can follow this page to keep up with this author's work.
If you are this author, and you don't want us to display this page anymore, please let us know.
Citations
... First, root tissue must be similar to callus tissue, which is sensitive to phytohormone signals; and second, this tissue must possess a source of undifferentiated cells available for differentiation to shoots or roots. These two conditions might be fulfilled by the lateral cambium in a secondarily thickened root (Bartušková et al., 2021), pericycle (Kerstetter and Hake, 1997) or callus tissue formed on a wounded root (Rauh, 1937). The idea that lateral cambium is the most suitable receptive tissue is supported by the fact that most root-sprouting plants are eudicots capable of secondary thickening, while other taxonomical groups that do not have secondary growth largely lack this ability (Bartušková et al., 2021). ...
