W Harkam’s research while affiliated with Graz University of Technology and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (3)


How many people are able to operate an EEG-based brain-computer interface (BCI)?
  • Article
  • Full-text available

July 2003

·

845 Reads

·

568 Citations

IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering: a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society

·

·

W Harkam

·

[...]

·

Ninety-nine healthy people participated in a brain-computer interface (BCI) field study conducted at an exposition held in Graz, Austria. Each subject spent 20-30 min on a two-session BCI investigation. The first session consisted of 40 trials conducted without feedback. Then, a subject-specific classifier was set up to provide the subject with feedback, and the second session--40 trials in which the subject had to control a horizontal bar on a computer screen--was conducted. Subjects were instructed to imagine a right-hand movement or a foot movement after a cue stimulus depending on the direction of an arrow. Bipolar electrodes were mounted over the right-hand representation area and over the foot representation area. Classification results achieved with 1) an adaptive autoregressive model (39 subjects) and 2) band power estimation (60 subjects) are presented. Roughly 93% of the subjects were able to achieve classification accuracy above 60% after two sessions of training.

Download

Current trends in Graz Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) research

July 2000

·

362 Reads

·

546 Citations

IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering

This paper describes a research approach to develop a brain-computer interface (BCI) based on recognition of subject-specific EEG patterns. EEG signals recorded from sensorimotor areas during mental imagination of specific movements are classified on-line and used e.g. for cursor control. In a number of on-line experiments, various methods for EEG feature extraction and classification have been evaluated.


Figure 3: A device driver for the RTI800a board (DAQ board from Analog Device) realizes the connection to the real world. In this case the input block represents analog input channel 1 to 3 (bipolar EEG channel C3, bipolar EEG channel C4, Trigger) and reads the data into the Simulink environment with a sampling frequency at 128 Hz. Channel 1 and 2 are connected to the 'RLS+LDA' algorithm blocks and channel 3 is the trigger signal used to initialize the RLS-algorithms at the beginning of every trial. 'RLS+LDA' calculate the RLS-algorithm with a sampling rate inherited from the blocks driving them (128 Hz). The output of the RLSalgorithms consists of six (p=6) time varying AR-coefficients for each EEG channel and is classified with a weight vector previously obtained from a linear discriminant analysis (LDA). The on-line classification result is gained and displayed with the Scope block 'Classification Result' and controls also the movement of the prosthesis. Either outcome of this real-time process (greater or lower than zero) will close or open the prosthesis a little bit more. The complete closing or opening time was set to 1 second. This means if the classification output was greater than zero for at least 1 second, then the prosthesis was closed for sure.
Figure 4: Timing of one trial of the experiment with feedback.
Figure 5: The error rate (100 % minus correct classification) is displayed over classification time points and different sessions for one subject.
Prosthetic Control by an EEG-based Brain- Computer Interface (BCI)

3,725 Reads

·

162 Citations

Citations (3)


... . Historical perspective NM-controlled WAs are typically utilized by individuals who have all their limbs. Interestingly, the technology for these augmentations often originates from innovations aimed at restoring functions for those who have lost one or more limbs, such as prosthetic devices for amputees (Battye et al., 1955;Horn, 1972;Guger et al., 1999;Bitzer and Van Der Smagt, 2006;Ferris et al., 2006;Bai et al., 2015). ...

Reference:

Neuro-motor controlled wearable augmentations: current research and emerging trends
Prosthetic Control by an EEG-based Brain- Computer Interface (BCI)

... There are two primary methods for the automated development of existing BCIs [16][17][18]. The first method involves collecting and training EEG signals for a specific population, which typically achieves high recognition accuracy but has limited applicability. ...

Current trends in Graz Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) research
  • Citing Article
  • July 2000

IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering

... Results show that six users out of nine (approximately 67%) had enough control in at least one training session, considering that an accuracy greater than 70% is considered as the threshold for BCI control and it is a typical criterion level of BCI control [12]. This percentage of 67% users in control seems to be relatively comparable with other studies that analyzed the accuracy in just one BCI training session [72,73]. This behaviour is expected since BCI designs that are based on ERD detection show greater illiteracy compared to designs that detect evoked potentials [14]. ...

How many people are able to operate an EEG-based brain-computer interface (BCI)?

IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering: a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society