Victor Barkhatov’s research while affiliated with Chelyabinsk State University and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (20)


Bad students
  • Article

January 2022

·

3 Reads

Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University

Victor I. Barkhatov

·



Fig. 1 Dynamics of the number of enterprises and organizations in Russia by type of ownership (private property -blue line, state property -red line). The increase in property in the period 2002 to 2018 occurred due to increased private property. The movement of state property also presents non-linear development, but with smaller slopes of the curve. The number of state-owned enterprises decreased from 367.4 thousand in 2000 to 288.7 in 2018. The maximum growth point was 2005; there were 412.5 thousand state-owned enterprises during this period, and then the number of state-owned enterprises decreased. From 2000 to 2018, transformations and shifts took place in the property structure. The capitalism development was accompanied by ratio change between state and private property in favor of the latter. During this period, the capitalist structure was fully formed, new property subjects, "owners of capital," arose. The economic base has wholly changed. From 2000 to 2005, the share of private property increased from 75 percent in 2000 to 80.5% in 2005. The share of state property decreased from 11.0 to 8.7%, respectively. From 2005 to 2015, private property share increased and in 2015 amounted to 86.8%, and state property -6.4% (the minimum value in the period). In 2018, the share of private property was 83.9%, and state -6.9%. A change in the proportion of ownership (an increase in private property) is a trend of ongoing changes, it characterizes a non-linear development process within the cyclical limits. The main element of the property is fixed assets. They are the central part of wealth. Therefore, it is vital to study the dynamics of fixed assets in the Russian economy. 2. Considering the period from 1990 to 2019, we can conclude that the dynamics of fixed assets is a non-linear process associated with the cyclical development of the economy. In the privatization of state property and its transformation into private property, the growth of fixed assets of both state and private property was minimal. From 1997 to 2008, there was a uniform increase in fixed assets of state and private enterprises, but the slope of the curves changed: the slope of the curve characterizing private fixed assets was higher than the curve for fixed assets of state enterprises. Since 2000, the growth of private fixed assets has been acquiring higher rates than the growth rates of state fixed assets. The divergence of the movement of fixed assets begins in 1995 and reaches a maximum in 2019. In 2018, there is a jump in private fixed assets. Their volume reaches a maximum. During this period, we can talk about creating prerequisites for a multiplier effect in the development of private fixed assets.
Property transformation as driver of Russia’s sustainable development
  • Article
  • Full-text available

May 2021

·

41 Reads

E3S Web of Conferences

A plurality of subjects of ownership characterizes the Russian economy. The transformation processes that began in 1991 continue to the present day. Until now, the question of the comparative effectiveness of various ownership forms remains open. Based on the analysis of trends in public and private property in Russia in 1992-2018, the article examines the correspondence of these processes to important systemic properties: cyclicity, cumulativeness, nonlinearity, and evolutionary character. Special attention is paid to such indicators of transformation processes as investments in fixed assets under various ownership forms. The conclusion is made about the low efficiency of the existing ownership structure in ensuring the Russian economy’s sustainable development. A hypothesis is put forward about the need to further develop forms and relations of ownership based on the development of alternative forms of ownership, including shared ownership.

Download

Fig. 1. Gross regional product growth rate (%) in 2001-2019, Ural federal district.
Fig. 2. Consumer prices growth rate (%) in 2001-2019, a Ural federal district.
Fig. 3. Investment in fixed assets growth rate (%) in 2001-2019, a Ural federal district.
Fig. 4. Industrial production growth rate (%, in fixed prices) in 2001-2019, a Ural federal district.
Variance coefficients of instability indicators Ural's regions of Russia.
Instability of socio-economic and sustainable development of Ural regions

January 2021

·

34 Reads

·

1 Citation

E3S Web of Conferences

Problems of development stability of regional economies are of particular importance in current conditions. The article presents the analysis of the sustainability of the development of Russian regions included in one of the most industrially developed federal districts - the Ural. The study used data from Rosstat for 2001-2019. The tendencies of the instability of indicators of socio-economic development of regions are revealed: gross regional product, investments in fixed assets, industrial production, and consumer prices. It has been established that the dynamics of the growth rates of these indicators are volatile. At the same time, all trends demonstrate a reasonably rapid recovery after the external shocks of 2008 and 2014. These indicators’ volatility was assessed using the variation coefficient in three different periods: 2001-2008, 2010-2014, and 2015-2019. The conclusion is made about the high instability of regional socio-economic development, while the level of instability in regions with a lower level of development turned out to be higher than in more developed ones. Particular attention is paid to trends in the level of instability, and it is noted that over time, less developed regions increase instability at a faster pace.



Fig. 1. Average monetary income in CR, PR-1 and PR-2 (RUR per month).
Fig. 2. Median employees wage in CR, PR-1 and PR-2 (RUR per month). The next indicator characterizing the standard of living of the population CR, PR-1 and
Fig. 3. Meat consumption in CR, PR-1 and PR-2 (kg per year).
Fig. 4. Deaths in road accidents in CR, PR-1 and PR-2 (persons per 100000 residents). The fifth indicator characterizing the differentiation of life quality by groups of regions is tourists traveling abroad. This indicator allows one to judge both the level of income and the choice of recreation options, which is associated with the convenience of transport routes. The difference in this indicator's values for CR and PR-1 reached 2 times by 2019 (while in 2015, it reached 3 times). The values for PR-2 are even lower. This indicates the presence of stable differences in the values of indicators for regions of different groups.
Life quality in the Center and Periphery of the Urals and the Volga regions

January 2021

·

43 Reads

·

8 Citations

E3S Web of Conferences

The quality of life plays a crucial role in ensuring sustainable development and improving human interaction with the environment, solving environmental problems. On the other hand, there is a tendency for the outflow of both people and their capital from peripheral regions to the centers, worsening the quality of life throughout the country. The article assesses the quality of life in the Urals and Volga regions using the center-periphery framework. The data of the regional statistics of Rosstat and the data of the RA RIA rating were used. The article uses the methods of statistical analysis, generalization, and abstraction. The stable types of regions (Center, Periphery 1, Periphery 2) were identified, the type of each region was identified. The assessment of trends in the level of monetary incomes, meat consumption, the number of tourists traveling abroad, and other life quality indicators by groups of regions. It is concluded that the division of regions according to the quality of life is stable, and the differences only increase.






Citations (7)


... According to the Russian law regulation, the criteria for business size are the following. The total revenue of small-sized is up to 800 mln RUR, middle-sized firms' total revenue is between 800 mln RUR and 2000 mln RUR, large-sized firms have the more significant total revenue (Pletnev, Barkhatov & Naumova, 2021). ...

Reference:

Russian transport high-growth firms during the COVID-19 pandemic
SME’s Criteria in National Economies and Its Scale: A Comparative Study

Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University

... O. S. Vakulenko and S. A. Grachev conduct a comprehensive assessment of the sustainable development of Russian regions, analyzing socio-economic and environmental indicators in order to form a standardized methodological approach to assessing the parameters of sustainable development and identifying donor regions [7]. D. A. Pletnev and V. I. Barkhatov assess the quality of life in the Ural and Volga regions using the center-periphery concept [8]. V. I. Belov analyzes the sustainable development of Russian regions, focusing on the economic and social aspects that affect long-term growth [9]. ...

Life quality in the Center and Periphery of the Urals and the Volga regions

E3S Web of Conferences

... At the same time, consistent with Zhou (2019) [62], the social system development levels of Beijing, Shenzhen, Guangzhou, Shanghai, Suzhou, and Hangzhou were at the forefront. Barkhatov (2021) and found that the quality of urban life interacts with the level of economic development, and the stability of economic development greatly affects the level of sustainable development in the region; they also observed that the GDP per capita was an important indicator for measuring the level of economic development [63,64]. This point of view is consistent with the results of our study, which also revealed that there is a strong correlation between the per capita GDP and the spatial pattern of the sustainable development level of urban human settlements. ...

Instability of socio-economic and sustainable development of Ural regions

E3S Web of Conferences

... For information in 1983 a square meter on average cost 250 rubles across in the country[3]. Statistics on average prices in the housing market for 1 square meter of the total area (figure 2) shows a trend of annual price growth from 2005 to 2019[4]. Although there are certain exceptions. ...

Reproduction of human potential in the Ural federal district in Russia under the new normal conditions

E3S Web of Conferences

... Turning agricultural land into commercial and residential space leads to a rising number of issues, which are particularly apparent in developing countries [36]. Our results corroborated other studies conducted in other Vietnamese cities, which found that, under pressure from population growth, flat agricultural land regions were consistently given precedence for conversion to built-up land [37,38]. This is especially true for Hue city, where during the previous 20 years, a sizable portion of the city's rice fields in the east and north have been transformed into residential zones. ...

The policy on agricultural land and its impact on agricultural production and peasant’s life in Vietnam

E3S Web of Conferences

... 2008-2009 гг. в разы превосходила их распространенность на Западе, а затем резко упала (Полунин, Юданов, 2016;Pletnev, Barkhatov, 2020). Одна из наиболее острых дискуссий о БРК прямо связана с проблемой цикла жизни: насколько закономерен или случаен их рост, можно ли продлить стадию взрывного роста и, следовательно, с помощью государственного стимулирования увеличить вклад газелей в развитие страны? ...

Ups and Downs of High-Growth Firms in Russia
  • Citing Chapter
  • May 2020

... Today, the Russian electric power industry faces both issues of implementing digital programs within the framework of the balance between reliability and efficient use of energy equipment, and issues related to the topic of increasing the efficiency of Russian corporations in the energy sector in the current geopolitical situation caused by sanctions pressure, increased competition in global markets and rising energy costs [4][5][6][7][8]. ...

Human Capital in Russian Power Generating Corporations

E3S Web of Conferences