V. N. Gavrin’s research while affiliated with Russian Academy of Sciences and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (197)


Experiment BEST-2 with 58Co neutrino source
  • Preprint

January 2025

·

4 Reads

V. N. Gavrin

·

·

T. V. Ibragimova

·

The article describes a new experiment with an artificial neutrino source 58Co on a gallium target GGNT (SAGE). The goal of the experiment is to study the gallium anomaly. The experiment makes it possible to find the parameters of oscillation transitions of electron neutrinos to sterile states in a wide range of parameters. Including the parameter {\Delta}m2, the experimental determination of which usually causes significant difficulties. An important feature of the experiment is the possibility of identifying the dependence of the gallium anomaly on the neutrino energy.





Gallium neutrino absorption cross section and its uncertainty

September 2023

·

15 Reads

·

12 Citations

Physical Review C

In the recent Baksan Experiment on Sterile Transitions (BEST), a suppressed rate of neutrino absorption on a gallium target was observed, consistent with earlier results from neutrino source calibrations of the SAGE and GALLEX/GNO solar neutrino experiments. The BEST Collaboration, utilizing a 3.4 MCi Cr51 neutrino source, found observed-to-expected counting rates at two very short baselines of R=0.791±0.05 and 0.766±0.05, respectively. Among recent neutrino experiments, BEST is notable for the simplicity of both its neutrino spectrum, line neutrinos from an electron-capture source whose intensity can be measured to a estimated precision of 0.23%, and its absorption cross section, where the precisely known rate of electron capture to the gallium ground state, Ge71(e−,νe)Ga71(g.s.), establishes a minimum value. However, the absorption cross section uncertainty is a common systematic in the BEST, SAGE, and GALLEX/GNO neutrino source experiments. Here we update that cross section, considering a variety of electroweak corrections and the role of transitions to excited states, to establish both a central value and reasonable uncertainty, thereby enabling a more accurate assessment of the statistical significance of the gallium anomalies. Results are given for Cr51 and Ar37 sources. The revised neutrino capture rates are used in a reevaluation of the BEST and gallium anomalies.



Baksan large neutrino telescope: current status

July 2023

·

8 Reads

Известия Российской академии наук Серия физическая

The status of the Baksan Large Neutrino Telescope project and some selective results of the first stage of the project, namely a prototype detector with a liquid scintillator mass of 0.5 tons are described. The results of the second stage of the project, a prototype with a liquid scintillator mass of 5 tons, and the prospects for the project are discussed.



Figure 3.1: A Cartoon of the BEST experiment configuration.
Figure 3.2: A photograph of the two-target volume during assembly.
Figure 3.4: A photograph of the BEST source as it is being removed from its transport container. To the right side of the photo, the calorimeter can be seen.
Figure 3.5: A photograph of a BEST proportional counter.
Figure 4.1: The dimensionless distribution L(D) which encodes detector and source geometry needed to compute the distribution of neutrino captures within the Ga volumes as a function of baseline (the distance D between the points where the neutrino is produced in the source and detected in the Ga volume). The total rate in the presence of oscillations is proportional to the integral over the convolution of L(D) with the oscillation probability Pee(E i ν , D) (see Sec. 2.4). Figure courtesy of Ralph Massarczyk.

+4

The Gallium Anomaly
  • Preprint
  • File available

June 2023

·

138 Reads

·

2 Citations

In order to test the end-to-end operations of gallium solar neutrino experiments, intense electron-capture sources were fabricated to measure the responses of the radiochemical SAGE and GALLEX/GNO detectors to known fluxes of low-energy neutrinos. Such tests were viewed at the time as a cross-check, given the many tests of 71Ge recovery and counting that had been routinely performed, with excellent results. However, the four 51Cr and 37Ar source experiments yielded rates below expectations, a result commonly known as the Ga anomaly. As the intensity of the electron-capture sources can be measured to high precision, the neutrino lines they produce are fixed by known atomic and nuclear rates, and the neutrino absorption cross section on 71Ga is tightly constrained by the lifetime of 71Ge, no simple explanation for the anomaly has been found. To check these calibration experiments, a dedicated experiment BEST was performed, utilizing a neutrino source of unprecedented intensity and a detector optimized to increase statistics while providing some information on counting rate as a function of distance from the source. The results BEST obtained are consistent with the earlier solar neutrino calibration experiments, and when combined with those measurements, yield a Ga anomaly with a significance of approximately 4sigma, under conservative assumptions. But BEST found no evidence of distance dependence and thus no explicit indication of new physics. In this review we describe the extensive campaigns carried out by SAGE, GALLEX/GNO, and BEST to demonstrate the reliability and precision of their experimental procedures, including 71Ge recovery, counting, and analysis. We also describe efforts to define uncertainties in the neutrino capture cross section. With the results from BEST, an anomaly remains.

Download

FIG. 3. Shaded region: numerically generated probability distribution for the 51 Cr cross section with excitedstate contributions extracted from forward-angle (p,n) cross sections of [57] (see text). Dashed line: the analytic split-normal fit to these data.
FIG. 4. The allowed regions for oscillations into a sterile state derived from the BEST inner and outer results. Left: the neutrino absorption cross section derived using the (p,n) data of [57] to constrain excited-state contributions. Right: results using the ( 3 He,t) data of [58]. The best-fit points are sin 2 2θ = 0.41 and ∆m 2 = 6.1 eV 2 and sin 2 2θ = 0.45 and ∆m 2 = 6.5 eV 2 , respectively (see text).
FIG. 5. As in Fig. 4, but combining the results of the two GALLEX and two SAGE calibrations with those of BEST. The best-fit points are sin 2 2θ = 0.32 and ∆m 2 = 1.25 eV 2 (left) and sin 2 2θ = 0.34 and ∆m 2 = 1.25 eV 2 (right).
The Gallium Neutrino Absorption Cross Section and its Uncertainty

March 2023

·

44 Reads

·

1 Citation

In the recent Baksan Experiment on Sterile Transitions (BEST), a suppressed rate of neutrino absorption on a gallium target was observed, consistent with earlier results from neutrino source calibrations of the SAGE and GALLEX/GNO solar neutrino experiments. The BEST collaboration, utilizing a 3.4 MCi 51Cr neutrino source, found observed-to-expected counting rates at two very short baselines of R=0.791 plus/minus 0.05 and 0.766 plus/minus 0.05, respectively. Among recent neutrino experiments, BEST is notable for the simplicity of both its neutrino spectrum, line neutrinos from an electron-capture source whose intensity can be measured to a estimated precision of 0.23%, and its absorption cross section, where the precisely known rate of electron capture to the gallium ground state, 71Ge(e,nue)71Ga(g.s.), establishes a minimum value. However, the absorption cross section uncertainty is a common systematic in the BEST, SAGE, and GALLEX/GNO neutrino source experiments. Here we update that cross section, considering a variety of electroweak corrections and the role of transitions to excited states, to establish both a central value and reasonable uncertainty, thereby enabling a more accurate assessment of the statistical significance of the gallium anomalies. Results are given for 51Cr and 37Ar sources. The revised neutrino capture rates are used in a re-evaluation of the BEST and gallium anomalies.


Citations (58)


... The LSND experiment [112] first reported such a signature using accelerator neutrinos, followed by MiniBooNE [113]. Later, similar anomalies were detected in gallium experiments [114][115][116][117][118]. Evidence for sterile oscillations has been found in reactor-based experiments [119] but may instead be a consequence of poor understanding of fission products inside reactors [120]. ...

Reference:

Accessing new physics with an undoped, cryogenic CsI CEvNS detector for COHERENT at the SNS
The gallium anomaly
  • Citing Article
  • October 2023

Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics

... In both zones they observe consistent deficits of R in = 0.79 ± 0.05 and R out = 0.77 ± 0.05 [8,9], so the current combined level of the deficit is R GALLEX+SAGE+BEST = 0.80 ± 0.05 [8,9] promoting the statistical significance of the anomaly beyond 4σ. Careful scrutiny [10,11] of the neutrino capture cross sections and its uncertainties does not provide an explanation of The idea that ν e may disappear during propagation from source to detector is no surprise nowadays, as the phenomenon of mass-induced neutrino flavour oscillations has been established beyond doubt (see for example the review in Ref. [12]) and the involved masses and mixing are being determined with increasing accuracy by the combined results of solar, reactor, atmospheric and long-baseline neutrino experiments (see Ref. [13] for the latest global analysis). Unfortunately, it is precisely such accuracy which puts in jeopardy the possible interpretation of the Gallium anomaly in terms of neutrino oscillations. ...

Gallium neutrino absorption cross section and its uncertainty
  • Citing Article
  • September 2023

Physical Review C

... First, the neutrino sources employed are well understood, as their intensities can be measured in multiple ways, to sub-1% precision, and as the spectra they produce are lines with precisely known energies and branching ratios. Second, the cross section for neutrino absorption on 71 Ga is tightly constrained by the known electron-capture lifetime of 71 Ge, which establishes a lower bound on the cross section, leaving only a ∼6% correction due to transitions to excited states in 71 Ge to be determined through a combination of experiment and theory: the cross section has been recently re-examined in an analysis that carefully propagates all known sources of uncertainty [3]. Third, the efficiency of the extraction of Ge from the Ga targets is independently verified by tracer experiments, in every experimental run. ...

The Gallium Neutrino Absorption Cross Section and its Uncertainty

... We propose to place radioactive neutrino sources such as 51 Cr near liquid xenon detectors to search for the neutrino anapole moment. The monoenergetic neutrino flux of a MCi 51 Cr source placed at 1-10 meters from the detector can exceed the solar neutrino flux by orders of magnitude, which may allow to detect electronic recoil rates sensitive to the neutrino anapole moment with current and near future planned experimental exposures at large volume liquid xenon experiments [34,35]. ...

Production of the artificial 51 Cr neutrino source in the BEST project
  • Citing Article
  • August 2022

Journal of Instrumentation

... There have also been numerous anomalous neutrino results which have been interpreted as disappearance with ∆m 2 's inconsistent with those that are well established. To date, there is one main results that remains unexplained and is at > 5σ which is in gallium experiments [71][72][73]. ...

Results from the Baksan Experiment on Sterile Transitions (BEST)
  • Citing Article
  • June 2022

Physical Review Letters

... Despite the strong skepticism and controversy regarding the existence of eV-scale sterile neutrinos, considerable interest in these neutrinos still remains. Prompted by LSND [1], MiniBooNE [2], and then the Gallium calibration anomaly [3][4][5][6][7][8][9] and some reactor antineutrino experiments [10], the existence of sterile neutrinos was further supported by the Neutrino-4 [11,12] and BEST data [13] and a recent hint from IceCube [14]. At the same time, these positive signals are in contradiction with a number of bounds from disappearance oscillation experiments at accelerators and reactors (a partial list of references is [15][16][17][18][19]) and experiments with solar neutrinos and KATRIN [20]. ...

Search for electron-neutrino transitions to sterile states in the BEST experiment
  • Citing Article
  • June 2022

Physical Review C

... It was also reported about JUNO, a reactor neutrino experiment under construction in China [21], which is particularly intriguing for cosmic neutrinos in combination with sensitivities of ORCA or IceCube-Upgrade. Also, BAKSAN, a multi-purpose liquid scintillator detector targeting geo-neutrinos and neutrinos from the CNO cycle is currently in an R&D stage of 5 t with a target mass of 10 kt [22]. ...

A new Baksan Large Neutrino Telescope: the project's status

... The source intensity in these experiments is measured calorimetrically [55], and since the decay is via electron capture, the main heat sources are X-rays from the de-excitation of the electron shell and gamma rays from the de-excitation of the daughter nucleus, with the latter contribution dominant by far. In fact, ∼ 10% of all 51 Cr decays populate the first excited state of 51 V at 320.0835(4) keV instead of the ground state. ...

Erratum: Measurement of neutrino source activity in the experiment BEST by calorimetric method

Journal of Instrumentation

... The BEST calorimetry results [58,59] were complimented by measurements of the γ radiation from the source between exposures. successful history, combined with multiple supporting measurements, as described above, gives one confidence the the source intensities were very well determined. ...

Measurement of neutrino source activity in the experiment BEST by calorimetric method
  • Citing Article
  • April 2021

Journal of Instrumentation