V. Gordon Rose’s research while affiliated with Simon Fraser University and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (3)


Jurors and Juries
  • Chapter
  • Full-text available

April 2006

·

84 Reads

·

1 Citation

·

Sonia R. Chopra

·

·

[...]

·

Download

Evaluating the Comprehensibility of Jury Instructions: A Method and an Example

August 2001

·

147 Reads

·

65 Citations

Methodological problems in jury simulation research involve issues of sampling, choice of stimulus materials, appropriate unit of analysis, appropriate dependent variable, corroborative data, and problems of role playing. Despite these issues, comprehension of jury instructions may be suitable for examination by jury simulation techniques--if certain of these methodological concerns can be satisfied. In a series of 5 experiments using typical Canadian legal instructions on criminal conspiracy and the coconspirator exception to the hearsay rule, this study attempted to validate a simple and inexpensive technique for testing the incomprehensibility of a given set of jury instructions by requiring participants to apply those legal instructions to a set of facts. The results demonstrate the utility of an application test, and suggest that for assessing the comprehensibility of jury instructions, it may be acceptable to use undergraduate students as participants, to use individual participants without group deliberation, and to employ written stimulus materials.


Citations (1)


... Ambiguity and a lack of feedback might make legal decisions harder for individuals for whom a court setting is unfamiliar, relying highly on asking for clarification of instructions. Mock jurors have been found to have low comprehension and application of instructions, and similar confidence in correct and incorrect answers (Gordon Rose & Ogloff, 2001). By having a gap between standardized instructions and comprehension, jurors rely on other factors for information. ...

Reference:

Understanding Convicting and Sentencing Decision Biases: A Review of Psychological Perspectives on Judicial Decision-Making
Evaluating the Comprehensibility of Jury Instructions: A Method and an Example