Trevor Cooper’s scientific contributions

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (4)


Figure 2: Portal Concept Diagram developed by participants in the Phase 2 Project Start-up Workshop in March, 2008 (Source: Arden, 2009)
Figure 3: GraniteNet Community Engagement Continuum (Source: Arden, 2009. Adapted from the IAP2 Public Participation Spectrum, 2004)
Flying blind, or going with the flow?: Using constructivist evaluation to manage the unexpected in the GraniteNet project
  • Article
  • Full-text available

January 2010

·

111 Reads

·

2 Citations

The Journal of Community Informatics

·

·

Trevor Cooper

The GraniteNet Project is a research and development collaboration between the University of Southern Queensland, Australia, and the community of Stanthorpe – a rural community of just over 10,000 people located within the university’s regional catchment area. The vision of this Community Informatics project, which commenced in 2007 and is now in its third phase, is the development of a sustainable community designed, owned and managed web portal that will support Stanthorpe’s development as a ‘learning community’. With funding from the State Government, the GraniteNet Board commissioned an evaluation of the second phase of the project which focussed on the design, development and trial of an incubator community portal environment, a portal governance framework and community engagement strategy. Participatory Action Research (PAR) and constructivist (or “Fourth Generation”) evaluation methodologies were adopted to guide the evaluation with the aims of documenting the project, establishing an evidence base to inform future decision-making, identifying and exploring significant contextual factors impacting on the project, evaluating the effectiveness of the models and processes used to guide the project, and building a culture of evaluation that would help to ensure ongoing review and critical reflection on progress. The evaluation design encompassed formative, summative and research evaluation. This paper reports the evaluation processes and outcomes, with a focus on exploring the ways in which these methodologies can be used to help Community Informatics researchers and practitioners learn from and about the unexpected and unanticipated in a field where learning through experimentation is the name of the game, imagination, creativity and collaborative design the keys to innovation and transformation, and where more traditional evaluation methodologies are becoming increasingly irrelevant.

Download

Building Capacity through Sustainable Engagement: Lessons for the Learning Community from the "GraniteNet" Project

January 2009

·

37 Reads

·

21 Citations

Australian Journal of Adult Learning

This paper reports an exploration into critical success factors for the sustainability of the partnership between the University of Southern Queensland and the Stanthorpe community during the GraniteNet Phoenix Project--the first phase of a three-phase participatory action research project conducted during 2007-2008. The concepts of learning community, social capital, university-community engagement and partnerships, and co-generative learning through participatory action research and evaluation are brought together to provide a framework for evaluating the sustainability and efficacy of the university-community relationship in the context of the GraniteNet project. Implications of the findings for the ongoing sustainability of the partnership are discussed, as well as for the relevance and utility of identified critical success factors. The paper also discusses implications of the findings for university-community engagement partnerships that utilise participatory action research and evaluation processes to build capacity through co-generative learning. (Contains 1 table and 1 figure.)


A learning community two years on: reflecting on successes and framing futures

June 2008

·

44 Reads

·

5 Citations

This paper reports the results of a participatory action research (PAR) evaluation conducted with the members of the Granite Belt Learners Group in their rural 'learning community' in South East Queensland, and presents an action research and evaluation framework to guide the community on the next stage of its journey.


Evaluating community engagement: Lessons from an Australian regional university

October 2007

·

11 Reads

·

6 Citations

Community engagement, along with personal fulfilment and economic resilience, is an integral element of lifelong learning (Global Learning Services, 2001). This paper reports the processes and outcomes of a collaborative community engagement research project undertaken by university researchers, local and state government and community partners that provides a testing ground for the principles and practices of community engagement, lifelong learning and e-democracy in a rural community context. The purpose of the research project was to evaluate the Granite Belt Community Engagement Network (GBCEN) project being conducted as part of Stanthorpe's Learning Community initiative. The evaluation used a Participatory Action Research (PAR) approach to evaluation designed to foster as well as measure effective community engagement practices. The paper reports the evaluation findings in terms of the perceived benefits, limitations and challenges of using e-democracy for improving local government community engagement and the potential for utilising schools, community leaders, local networks and interactional infrastructure to enhance lifelong learning and community engagement in rural and regional communities. The paper also discusses implications for the enhancement of university regional and community engagement through collaborative research and evaluation projects that build bridging and linking ties between formal education institutions and situated non-formal and informal learning that occurs in communities and organisations. The paper concludes with recommendations for enhancing the relevance of research and scholarship in a regional university to the needs of the communities it serves.

Citations (4)


... Mutual benefits were lost as the focus of the engagement turned to the minutiae and to issues outside the projects scope. Unfortunately, failures in engagement between stakeholders are often not accidental [12]. Many engagements are limited to superficial planning, cursory input, limited discussions of the real ramifications of decisions, and poor supports to help stakeholders become informed and capable of exerting a real influence. ...

Reference:

Developing the Synergy between University and Industry-based Nursing Courses: Lessons in Engagement
Evaluating community engagement: Lessons from an Australian regional university
  • Citing Article
  • October 2007

... On the related question of who serves to benefit most from community learning projects such as GraniteNet, evaluation data from Phases 2 and 3 (Arden, McLachlan, Cooper & Stebbings, 2008;Arden, 2009;) reveal a tendency to privilege the already privileged rather than those at the margins in whose interests the project was originally conceived. For example, whilst engagement and empowerment of all sectors of the communityand particularly more marginalised groupsis one of the characteristics of the participatory action research method as well as an explicit objective of the GraniteNet project, the data indicated that it is primarily individuals who are already engaged in formal education and mainstream employment who tend to benefit the most. ...

A learning community two years on: reflecting on successes and framing futures

... González and Healey (2005) note that community involvement foster innovation and enhance capacity which contributes to sustainability. The study by Arden et al (2009) analyse the sustainability of relationships between the universities and their communities. Their aim is to add to the existing body of knowledge on building capacity through sustainable engagement that seeks to build capacity and support the development of learning community between university and community. ...

Building Capacity through Sustainable Engagement: Lessons for the Learning Community from the "GraniteNet" Project
  • Citing Article
  • January 2009

Australian Journal of Adult Learning

... For detailed evaluation reports see (seeArden, 2009;McLachlan & Arden, 2009;Arden, McLachlan & Cooper, 2010) ...

Flying blind, or going with the flow?: Using constructivist evaluation to manage the unexpected in the GraniteNet project

The Journal of Community Informatics