Tong Zhao’s research while affiliated with Lanzhou University Second Hospital and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (5)


Relationship between DDR1 repression and CCL4-induced liver fibrosis. Mouse liver tissue stained with (A) H&E, (B) Masson, and (E) DDR1; n = 6. Original magnification: ×100. (C) Quantification of Masson-positive areas in liver sections. (F) Quantification of immunostained areas in liver sections. (G) Representative immunoblot and quantification of DDR1 protein levels; n = 4. β-Tubulin was used as a loading control. (H) Gene expression of DDR1 in mouse livers via RT-qPCR; n = 3. (D) Relative ALT and AST activities in serum from WT and DDR1-KO mice after being treated with CCl4; n = 6. Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. *P <0.05, **P <0.01, and ***P <0.001.
Effect of DDR1 on the activation of HSC in CCL4-induced liver fibrosis.
(A) Immunohistochemical staining of αSMA in mouse livers; n = 6. Original magnification: ×100. (B) Quantification of αSMA-stained areas in liver sections. (C) Western blot analyses of αSMA and COL1; n = 4. GAPDH was used as a loading control. (D) Gene expression of αSMA and COL1 in mouse livers via RT-qPCR; n = 3. Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. *P <0.05, **P <0.01, and ***P <0.001.
The effects of DDR1 on LX2 cells in vitro experiments. (A) Protein expression of DDR1 in control or DDR1 overexpression (OE) LO2 cells. Collecting the conditioned medium (CM) from control and DDR1-OE LO2 cells with or without collagen treated, after LX2 cells exposed to the above CM 48h,(B) the gene expression of αSMA and COL1, (C) protein expression of αSMA and COL1 and (D) cell proliferation in LX2 cells were assessed by RT-qPCR, Western blot, and CCK-8, respectively. (E) Western blot confirmed the knock-down (KD) of DDR1 in HepG2 cells. LX2 cells exposed to CM from control or DDR1-KD cells with or without collagen treated, the results of (F) gene expression of αSMA and COL1, (G) protein expression of αSMA and COL1, and (H) cell proliferation in LX2 cells was assessed after 48h by RT-qPCR, Western blot, and CCK-8, respectively. Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation; n = 3. *P <0.05, **P <0.01, and ***P <0.001.
DDR1-mediated upregulation of IL6, TNFα, TGFβ1. Relative gene expression in DDR1-OE LO2 cells (A) and DDR1-KD HepG2 cells (E) with collagen treated were assessed by RT-qPCR. Protein levels of IL6, TNFα, and TGFβ1 in supernatants from DDR1-OE LO2 cells (B-D) and DDR1-KD HepG2 cells (F-H) with or without collagen treated were quantified by ELISA. (I-K) Gene expression of IL6, TNFα, TGFβ1 in mouse livers via RT-qPCR. Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation; n = 3. *P <0.05, **P <0.01, and ***P <0.001.
The inhibitory effects of neutralizing antibodies(anti-IL6, anti-TNFα, and anti-TGFβ1) on LX2 cell activation and proliferation induced by CM from collagen-treated DDR1-OE LO2 cells. DDR1-OE LO2 Cells CM were pretreated with anti-IL6, anti-TNFα, anti-TGFβ1 or control antibodies (mouse IgG1 or goat IgG), and (A and B) the protein expression of αSMA and COL1, (C and D) the gene expression of αSMA and COL1 and (E) proliferation in LX2 cells induced by DDR1-OE LO2 cells CM were assessed by RT-qPCR, Western blot, and CCK-8, respectively. Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation; n = 3. *P <0.05, **P <0.01, and ***P <0.001. ns: nonsignificant difference.

+2

DDR1-Induced Paracrine Factors of Hepatocytes Promote HSC Activation and Fibrosis Development
  • Article
  • Full-text available

January 2024

·

43 Reads

·

1 Citation

Ying Meng

·

Tong Zhao

·

·

[...]

·

Background This study investigated the role and potential mechanisms of Discoidin domain receptors-1 (DDR1) during liver fibrogenesis. Methods Blood and livers were collected from mice. In the in vitro experiments, human normal hepatocyte (LO2 cell line) and human hepatoma cells (HepG2 cell line) with overexpressed DDR1 (DDR1-OE) or DDR1 knockdown (DDR1-KD) were constructed by transfecting the corresponding lentivirus. Human hepatic stellate cells (LX2 cell line) were incubated with a conditioned medium (CM) of the above stable transfected cells treated with collagen. The cells and supernatants were collected for molecular and biochemical analyses. Results DDR1 expression was increased in hepatocytes from carbon tetrachloride (CCL4)-induced fibrotic livers compared to normal livers in wild-type (WT) mice. Liver fibrosis was relieved, and hepatic stellate cells (HSC) activation was decreased in CCL4-treated DDR1 knockout (DDR1-KO) mice compared with CCL4-treated WT mice. LX2 cells cultured in CM of LO2 DDR1-OE cells revealed increased α-smooth muscle actin (αSMA) and type I collagen (COL1) expressions and cell proliferation. Meanwhile, cell proliferation and the expression levels of αSMA and COL1 in LX2 cells cultured in CM of HepG2 DDR1-KD cells were decreased. Moreover, IL6, TNFα, and TGFβ1 in CM of DDR1-OE cells appeared to promote LX2 cell activation and proliferation, regulated by NF-κB and Akt pathways. Conclusion These results indicated that DDR1 in hepatocytes promoted HSC activation and proliferation and that paracrine factors IL6, TNFα, and TGFβ1 induced by DDR1 through activating NF-κB and Akt pathways may be the underlying mechanisms. Our study suggests that collagen-receptor DDR1 may be a potential therapeutic target for hepatic fibrosis.

Download


Figure 1 -Flow chart of literature selection.
Figure 2 -A) Forrest plot of hazard ratio (HR) for the association between serum albumin (SA) and all-cause mortality; B) Forrest plot of the hazard ratio for the association between SA and the composite endpoint of all-cause mortality and HF rehospitalization; C) Forrest plot of the hazard ratio for the association between geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) and all-cause mortality; D) Forrest plot of the hazard ratio for the association between GNRI and cardiovascular mortality; E) Forrest plot of the hazard ratio for the association between prognostic nutritional index (PNI) and all-cause mortality. Heterogeneity among studies was determined using I2 statistics at a significance level of p < 0.05. CI: confidence interval; HR: hazard ratio.
Significado Prognóstico de Marcadores Associados à Nutrição na Insuficiência Cardíaca com Fração de Ejeção Preservada: Uma Revisão Sistemática e Metanálise

April 2023

·

9 Reads

·

1 Citation

Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia

Background: The prognostic significance of nutrition indicators in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is unclear. Objectives: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the prognostic value of serum albumin (SA), the geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI), and the prognostic nutritional index (PNI) in patients with HFpEF. Methods: Databases of PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were systematically searched for all studies published up to January 2022. The prognostic significance of SA, GNRI, and PNI for HFpEF was explored. Pooled hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated using the STATA 15.0 software. The Quality of Prognosis Studies tool was used to assess the quality of studies. Results: Nine studies met the inclusion criteria, and 5603 adults with HFpEF were included in the meta-analysis. The analyses showed that a decreased SA or GNRI was significantly related to high all-cause mortality (HR: 1.98; 95% CI: 1.282-3.057; p = 0.002; and HR: 1.812;95% CI: 1.064-3.086; p = 0.029, respectively). Furthermore, a lower SA indicates a bad composite outcome of all-cause mortality and HF rehospitalization (HR: 1.768; 95% CI: 1.483-2.108; p = 0.000), and a lower GNRI was significantly associated with high cardiovascular mortality (HR: 1.922; 95% CI: 1.504-2.457;p = 0.000). However, a lower PNI did not correlate with all-cause mortality (HR: 1.176; 95% CI: 0.858-1.612, p=0.314). Conclusions: Our meta-analysis indicates that SA and GNRI may be useful indicators to predict the prognosis of patients with HFpEF.


Metabolic changes in the liver microenvironment.
The changes of immune microenvironment in liver fibrosis.
Vascular changes in the liver microenvironment.
changes in ECM in the liver microenvironment.
The role of hepatic microenvironment in hepatic fibrosis development

November 2022

·

41 Reads

·

17 Citations

Aim Fibrosis is a common pathological feature of most types of chronic liver injuries. There is no specific treatment for liver fibrosis at present. The liver microenvironment, which fosters the survival and activity of liver cells, plays an important role in maintaining the normal structure and physiological function of the liver. The aim of this review is to deeply understand the role of the liver microenvironment in the dynamic and complicated development of liver fibrosis. Methods After searching in Elsevier ScienceDirect, PubMed and Web of Science databases using ‘liver fibrosis’ and ‘microenvironment’ as keywords, studies related to microenvironment in liver fibrosis was compiled and examined. Results The homeostasis of the liver microenvironment is disrupted during the development of liver fibrosis, affecting liver cell function, causing various types of cell reactions, and changing the cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions, eventually affecting fibrosis formation. Conclusion Liver microenvironment may be important for identifying potential therapeutic targets, and restoring microenvironment homeostasis may be an important strategy for promoting the reversal of liver fibrosis. KEY MESSAGES The homeostasis of the liver microenvironment is disrupted in liver fibrosis; A pro-fibrotic microenvironment is formed during the development of liver fibrosis; Restoring microenvironment homeostasis may be an important strategy for promoting the reversal of liver fibrosis.


Citations (2)


... Moreover, TGF-β1-induced increased levels of ROS and 8-OHdG, a DNA damage marker, were inhibited by circABHD3 knockdown (Fig 2D and 2E). In addition, hepatic fibrosis is associated with mitochondrial dysfunction, which can lead to hepatocyte damage, immune cell activation, inflammation, and trans-differentiation of hepatic stellate cells [30][31][32]. We found that TGF-β1-induced increased JC-1 monomer and decreased JC-1 aggregate in TGF-β1-treated THLE-2 and AML12 cells were reduced by circABHD3 knockdown, suggesting that circABHD3 knockdown suppressed TGF-β1-induced impaired mitochondrial membrane potential (Fig 2F). ...

Reference:

MEOX1-mediated transcriptional regulation of circABHD3 exacerbates hepatic fibrosis through promoting m6A/YTHDF2-dependent YPEL3 mRNA decay to activate β-catenin signaling
The role of hepatic microenvironment in hepatic fibrosis development

... Though a large amount of data is available which gives an explanation on the association of the cardiac functions and subclinical hypothyroidism. (1,5,7,8) Another viewpoint of our study can be, despite the nonsignificant difference in the levels of TSH in pairs of group 1& group 2 and group 3 & 4, there exists a significant rise in the levels of the cardiac markers. These results may point towards a need for revised reference ranges for the cardiac markers with respect to SCH in elderly in cases of acute chest pain or MI in order to reduce the over diagnosis of MI patients based on cardiac markers. ...

Association between sub-clinical hypothyroidism and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Chinese Medical Journal