Tina Katharina Amann's research while affiliated with Hof University of Applied Sciences and other places
What is this page?
This page lists the scientific contributions of an author, who either does not have a ResearchGate profile, or has not yet added these contributions to their profile.
It was automatically created by ResearchGate to create a record of this author's body of work. We create such pages to advance our goal of creating and maintaining the most comprehensive scientific repository possible. In doing so, we process publicly available (personal) data relating to the author as a member of the scientific community.
If you're a ResearchGate member, you can follow this page to keep up with this author's work.
If you are this author, and you don't want us to display this page anymore, please let us know.
It was automatically created by ResearchGate to create a record of this author's body of work. We create such pages to advance our goal of creating and maintaining the most comprehensive scientific repository possible. In doing so, we process publicly available (personal) data relating to the author as a member of the scientific community.
If you're a ResearchGate member, you can follow this page to keep up with this author's work.
If you are this author, and you don't want us to display this page anymore, please let us know.
Publications (2)
Background
The aim of this work is to analyze reports of migraine attacks collected online in the citizen science project CLUE with respect to gender- and migraine type-specific differences in drug effectiveness and pain perception. Citizen science project data collection opens the possibility to examine these differences based on a large number of...
Background
The aim of this work is to analyze the reports on cluster headache attacks collected online in the citizen science project CLUE with respect to the effectiveness of drugs taken during the attacks. The collection of data within the framework of citizen science projects opens up the possibility of investigating the effectiveness of acute m...
Citations
... 22 Additional evidence suggesting subtle pathophysiological differences between patients with ECH and CCH include differences in response to the same treatment, as seen in examples from clinical trials to date with lithium 26,27 (efficacious in CCH but not ECH) and galcanezumab 28,29 (efficacious in ECH but not CCH) in preventive treatment, as well as non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation for acute treatment (efficacious in ECH but not CCH). 30,31 However, some CH treatments, particularly acute treatments such as subcutaneous and intranasal triptans and oxygen are efficacious in both ECH and CCH, [32][33][34][35][36] although some studies have reported differences in the magnitude of response. 32,33,35 Treatments to interrupt cluster periods or reduce the frequency of attacks (i.e., preventive treatment) are generally based on recommendations from treatment guidelines. ...