Timothy G. Hegstrom's research while affiliated with San Jose State University and other places
What is this page?
This page lists the scientific contributions of an author, who either does not have a ResearchGate profile, or has not yet added these contributions to their profile.
It was automatically created by ResearchGate to create a record of this author's body of work. We create such pages to advance our goal of creating and maintaining the most comprehensive scientific repository possible. In doing so, we process publicly available (personal) data relating to the author as a member of the scientific community.
If you're a ResearchGate member, you can follow this page to keep up with this author's work.
If you are this author, and you don't want us to display this page anymore, please let us know.
It was automatically created by ResearchGate to create a record of this author's body of work. We create such pages to advance our goal of creating and maintaining the most comprehensive scientific repository possible. In doing so, we process publicly available (personal) data relating to the author as a member of the scientific community.
If you're a ResearchGate member, you can follow this page to keep up with this author's work.
If you are this author, and you don't want us to display this page anymore, please let us know.
Publication (1)
Two situational constraints are examined, a dissent condition, which fosters tolerance for dissent, and a mimetic condition, which inhibits dissent. The organizational theory concern that organizational values may dominate over individual values, and the rhetorical theory concern regarding the quality of mimesis, are likely the same problem and lea...
Citations
... Organizational dissent enables organizations to adapt to changing conditions and be sustainable (Kassing 2011a). In addition, organizational dissent has many positive results such as increasing innovation and creativity (Aksel 2013), job satisfaction (Lutgen-Sandvik et al. 2011;Avtgis et al. 2007), perception of justice (Avery and Quinones 2002), and improving decision-making processes (Hegstrom 1990;Redding 1985). However, when managers do not consider or suppress the employees' dissenting issues, the organization becomes autocratic by moving away from being a democratic structure. ...
