Thomas Kunze’s research while affiliated with TU Dresden and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (12)


Figure 4: Turnaround AOBT values compared to the appropriate GMAN TOBT prediction spectrum, LEJ, September 2013
Figure 5: 4 microscopic process scenarios for boarding
Turnaround prediction and controling with micrsocopic process modelling GMAN proof of concept & possiblities to use microscopic process szenarios as control options
  • Article
  • Full-text available

June 2014

·

104 Reads

·

1 Citation

Bernd Oreschko

·

Thomas Kunze

·

Tobias Gerbothe

·

For most flight phases automated and reliable target time predictions for an efficient resource management are common, but during the turnaround on ground best guessing by staff is still the standard. The turnaround prediction concept of TU-Dresden, called GMAN, is an approach to predict the Total Turnaround Time and the appropriate Target Off Block Time. The proof of concept in a real airport environment shows it ability to work reliable in an automated ATM-system, with suitable adjustments to the local information environement. Further an approach with microscopic process definition to offer control options is shown.

Download

Modelling and evaluation of automated arrival management considering air traffic demands

November 2013

·

2,221 Reads

·

12 Citations

·

·

T Kunze

·

[...]

·

P Kappertz

This paper describes the major results of the UTOPIA project. UTOPIA is part of the SESAR Work Package E program, which is addressing long-term and innovative research for the Single European Sky. One of the greatest challenges that the future ATM system will need to face in the next decades is the integration of new airspace users and the continuous increase in delegating capacity and safety critical traffic management functions to automated systems. The accommodation of these new airspace users, which will have to coexist with conventional users, a widely reorganized airspace and the increased level of automation will necessarily need a paradigm shift with regard to the trajectory management functions. The objective of the UTOPIA project was to provide a better understanding of essential trajectory management functions to efficiently manage heterogeneous traffic considering the increasing presence of autonomous ATM systems. In particular, UTOPIA focused on data models, synchronization requirements and algorithms needed to ensure the safe management of merging traffic in an extended terminal maneuvering area, executed by an autonomous arrival management function acting as separator. The converging flows of traffic that was studied comprise heterogeneous airborne systems, in particular, advanced and legacy flight management systems, representing airspace users with different synchronization capabilities.


Microscopic Process Modelling for Efficient Aircraft Turnaround Management

July 2013

·

1,392 Reads

·

21 Citations

While the current turnaround handling shows potential for prediction and reliability improvement, the turnaround management approach (GMAN) of the Department of Air Traffic Technology and Logistics at TU Dresden describes a scientific foundation using a stochastic approach for process description and delay modeling. Based on recent air traffic network and delay analysis, new delay input data could be derived for Euro-pean airports. In a first step to integrate open and closed-loop process control for higher automation levels in turnaround management , the sub-processes of aircraft cleaning and boarding have been modeled and implemented, showing great potential of minimizing aircraft ground time in case of disturbances. Further enhancements to the turnaround model include the integration of the processes pushback and deicing, which by definition are not a part of the turnaround, but can significantly contribute to aircraft delay and therefore need to be considered for airport ground operations.


Boarding on the critical path of the turnaround

June 2013

·

4,453 Reads

·

43 Citations

Due to the fact that the boarding is always on the critical path of the aircraft turnaround, efficient boarding strategies are an essential for a reliable turnaround progress. Since the boarding time mainly depends on the amount of passengers, arrival rate, passenger boarding sequence and aircraft type we investigate different boarding scenarios on three reference aircraft: Airbus A320 (single aisle), Boeing B777 and Airbus A380 (both with a twin aisle configuration). The proposed microscopic approach of modeling the passenger behavior is primarily based on the asymmetric simple exclusion process, where the passenger motion is defined as a one dimensional, stochastic, and time/space discrete transition process. The provided analysis focuses on substantial boarding strategies and the scenarios are evaluated with common statistical criteria (e.g. expected value, variance, quantiles). In the context of both reliable boarding progress and delay compensation during the turnaround our results basically emphasize the use of an additional door for the boarding process (20 - 25 % savings), followed by a change of the boarding strategy (10 - 15 % savings), and the potential application of different seat layouts (3 % savings). First validation checks are performed against measurements of field trials with Airberlin. These tests point out the high reliability of the proposed stochastic aircraft boarding model.


Table 1 : Process times for cleaning process
An approach for efficient Aircraft Turnaround Operations using automated decision support

January 2013

·

340 Reads

·

1 Citation

While the current turnaround handling shows potential for prediction and reliability improvement, the turnaround management approach of the Department of Air Traffic Technology and Logistics at TU Dresden describes a scientific foundation using a stochastic approach for process description and delay modelling. Based on recent air traffic network and delay analysis, new delay input data could be derived for European airports. In a first step to integrate open and closed-loop process control for higher automation levels in turnaround management, the sub-processes of aircraft cleaning and boarding have been modelled and implemented, showing great potential to minimize aircraft ground time in case of disturbances.


Modeling external disturbances for aircraft in flight to build reliable 4D trajectories

January 2013

·

287 Reads

·

10 Citations

The introduction of trajectory based operation in future Air Traffic Management Systems is driven by the European SESAR and American NextGen Initiatives and relies on a common view for four-dimensional trajectories. Herein, Decision Support Tools will play an important role as automation will certainly increases over time to allow predicting and amending current 3D trajectories in a real-time environment by taking into account external disturbances to the aircraft such as weather or wind. This paper presents a model to generate 4D trajectories based on stochastic disturbances acting on the aircraft in flight. It was developed within the UTOPIA Project, part of SESAR Work Package E. Definitions for momentary position uncertainty and its projection over time as "corridor of uncertainty" are presented in this paper paving the way for a model transferring external disturbances into position uncertainty adhering to the trajectory. Results from the implemented model show quantified position uncertainties along the corridor of uncertainty based on the Eurocontrol BADA 3 aircraft performance model. The research shows that the presented approach to transfer stochastic disturbances into position uncertainty is suitable for dedicated applications but not in general.


Effizientes Bodenprozessmanagement unter Berücksichtigung stochastischer Planabweichungen

January 2013

·

65 Reads

Alle Prozesse und Koordinationserfordernisse zur Abfertigung eines LFZ ab dem Erreichen der Parkposition (In-Block) bis zum Verlassen dieser (Off-Block) werden als Turnaround bezeichnet. Die Prozesse des Turnarounds umfassen dabei im Kern das De-boarding, Fuelling, Catering, Cleaning, Loading und Boarding. Diese können aus rechtlichen und verfahrenstechnischen Gründen nur zum Teil parallelisiert werden. Kritisch ist also jene Kopplung von sequenziellen Prozessen zu werten, die bei einer Verzögerung in einem Prozess die Dauer des Turnarounds direkt beeinflussen. Der Turnaround ist im Rahmen des A-CDM zeitlich determiniert, so kann die Zielzeit für das Ende des Turnarounds (Target Off-Block-Time TOBT) bereits vor Erreichen der Parkposition festgelegt werden. Durch die Berücksichtigung der TOBT innerhalb der Verkehrsflusssteuerung und durch eine gezielt angepasste Reihenfolge des Ausparkens (Pushback) wird die Kapazität des Flughafens besser ausgenutzt. Das A-CDM Konzept lässt allerdings offen, wie und wann die TOBT konkret zu bestimmen ist. Auch existiert bisher kein standardisierter Algorithmus, um die Abfertigungsdauer eines Luftfahrzeuges mit einer vorzugebenden Mindestqualität und Zuverlässigkeit unter Berücksichtigung der Bedarfsplanung von Personal und technischen Ressourcen zu ermitteln. Im heutigen Bodenprozessmanagement werden hierfür nur feste Prozesszeiten in Abhängigkeit der Art des Flughafens (Hub versus Zubringer) und des Luftfahrzeugtyps unterstellt, ohne dabei die systemimmanenten Streuungen in der Prozessrealisierung abzubilden.


Uncertainty Handling and Trajectory Synchronization for the Automated Arrival Management

November 2012

·

385 Reads

·

22 Citations

One of the greatest challenges that the future ATM system will need to face in the next decades is the integration of new airspace users and the continuous increase in delegating capacity and safety critical traffic management functions to automated systems. The accommodation of these new airspace users, which will have to coexist with conventional users, a widely reorganized airspace and the increased level of automation will necessarily need a paradigm shift with regard to the trajectory management functions. The objective of the UTOPIA project is to provide a better understanding of essential trajectory management functions to efficiently manage heterogeneous traffic considering the increasing presence of autonomous ATM systems. In particular, we will focus on the data models, synchronization requirements and algorithms needed to ensure the safe management of merging traffic in an extended TMA, executed by an autonomous arrival management function acting as separator. The converging flows of traffic that will be studied comprise heterogeneous airborne systems, in particular, advanced and legacy flight management systems, representing airspace users with different synchronization capabilities.


Turnaround Prediction with Stochastic Process Times and Airport Specific Delay Pattern

June 2012

·

1,640 Reads

·

32 Citations

The A-CDM's (Airport Collaborative Decision Making) goal of accurate turnaround time prediction in not met by traditional deterministic models or best guessing. During this research, the influence of the stochastic arrival process on the turnaround process is captured by modeling stochastically all elements of the turnaround as part of a Ground Manager (GMAN). Since arrival delay is one major factor influencing turnaround time process duration and variance, and delay occurs in larger amplitudes at U.S. airports compared to European ones due the absence of slot control, the presented GMAN concept is tested with arrival delay data from the U.S. NAS (National Airspace System). The arrival delay is collected from ASPM (Aviation System Performance Metrics) and custom probability distributions were fitted on the data for different airport categories. The results obtained from this analysis by showing the proof of concept of the GMAN, are discussed in this paper Turnaround, prediction, processes, buffers, delay, A-CDM


Fig. 1. Turnaround time schedule of A380 (90 min, baseline [8]).
Fig. 8: Sources for process description and Trigger Information for GMAN process prediction 
Dynamic turnaround management in a highly automated airport environment

January 2012

·

3,353 Reads

·

7 Citations

The aircraft turnaround is a time-critical process linking flight legs with various potential disruptions far beyond those appearing during flight. This is often caused due to the lack of substantial automation and limited standardization in aircraft ground handling ranging from human resource skills to equipment types. Whenever a disturbance occurs (e.g. while boarding or fueling) as part of the so-called critical path, these effects immediately cause a disruption propagation resulting in accumulating delay through the whole air traffic network. To allow for an efficient process control and prediction, the turnaround management will have to be systematically standardized ensuring the compatibility to the expected increase of the automation level. Our proposed turnaround model is using closed-loop stochastic dynamic process optimization considering input and state constraints to bridging the efficiency gap between ground and airborne operations. It will also use stochastic models to describe every turnaround sub-process, to be shaped according to expected behavior resulting from increased automation which is based on previous research results.


Citations (11)


... This paper revises the linkage between inbound and outbound flights by assessing aircraft operational flow (turnaround integration in the air traffic network). This approach is in line with past analyses [24,[32][33][34]. Our main contribution in this field is the construction of a Business Process Model (BPM) that shapes the airspace/airside integration, by extending the spatial scope to the Extended Terminal Manoeuvring Area (E-TMA) boundaries. ...

Reference:

Uncertainty Management at the Airport Transit View
Turnaround prediction and controling with micrsocopic process modelling GMAN proof of concept & possiblities to use microscopic process szenarios as control options

... The principle of Trajectory Uncertainty has been introduced to incorporate these inaccuracies in the TP. The Trajectory Uncertainty is divided into three Cartesian dimensions as the Along-Track Uncertainty (ATU), Vertical-Track Uncertainty (VTU), and Cross-Track Uncertainty (XTU) with reference to a certain point in time of the trajectory [1], [8]. Therefore, two different forms are used to characterize the Trajectory Uncertainty. ...

Modeling external disturbances for aircraft in flight to build reliable 4D trajectories

... It might be of interest for further investigation, what influence on the parameters of the fitting functions would be raised by using specific turnaround models. For example, the distribution of actual in-block time deviations used in the simulations could be replaced by Weibull distributions which might consider airport specific delay patterns [7][8] [9]. In addition, the different flight operations (short haul vs. long haul, low budget vs. regular flight) and the characteristics of aircraft types motivate further studies on the subject due to their individual turnaround processing chains. ...

An approach for efficient Aircraft Turnaround Operations using automated decision support

... Te duration of certain ground handling operations and, consequently, of the entire turnaround may change depending on the aircraft type, the number of passengers, and quantity of cargo. Furthermore, TAT can be infuenced by the efciency of turnaround operations and the airport's operational conditions [36]. TAT calculated in this paper are based on the assumption that the time of each activity of the turnaround process is guaranteed to be seamless, which means that when the previous activity is completed, the next activity will begin immediately after it. ...

Turnaround Prediction with Stochastic Process Times and Airport Specific Delay Pattern

... None has actually investigated the impact that the low-cost carriers' constructs, specifically turn-time, would have on their market share, and to a large extent, the mechanism through which it would achieve that. Several studies i.e. [17][21] have investigated about the models for the turn-around operations that would minimize delays, and consequently, costs. References [4] [6] [8] [12] employ descriptive statistics in analyzing their data on the effect of low cost carriers on the network carriers' market share. ...

Aircraft Turnaround Management in a Highly Automated 4D Flight Operations
  • Citing Conference Paper
  • January 2011

... Based on the aforementioned simulation methodologies, several key [18], and machine learning [19] to predict the turnaround time. Te Critical Path Method (CPM), among the optimization methodologies has been applied to model the turnaround process [20,21]. However, the existence of the operational uncertainties such as delays or the propagation of delays [3,20,[22][23][24][25][26] has made the calculation of the turnaround time based on the CPM inaccurate. ...

Microscopic Process Modelling for Efficient Aircraft Turnaround Management

... Other studies end at the airport slot allocation and are not interested in the effect of trajectory deviations on the delay costs [37][38][39][40][41]. Other authors focus on the absorption of delays, neglecting negative effects as increased costs by gaining speed [42]. ...

UTOPIA - Universal Trajectory Synchronization for Highly Predictable Arrivals Enabled by Full Automation

... Introduction A three-fold or more increase in air traffic is expected by 2025, as predicted by Joint Planning and Development Office (JPDO) of which FAA is one member [1,2]. Single European Sky ATM Research (SESAR) launched by the European Community aims at implementing Trajectory Based Operations (TBO) to allow for desired flexibility, which rely on airborne system function as well as ground based Decision-Support Tools (DSTs) [3,4,5 ]. The DSTs are responsible for trajectory prediction and also for managing the trajectories between incoming aircraft and the ATC. ...

Uncertainty Handling and Trajectory Synchronization for the Automated Arrival Management

... Further three critical operational parameters TAT, MCT and arrival delays are varied to analyze their interactions with one another (cf. [28]). Finally all these sub-components are integrated in an optimized gate allocation scenario, to analyze their impacts upon missed connections. ...

Dynamic turnaround management in a highly automated airport environment

... With the advancement of information technology and data science, various types of automation tools have been applied in the air traffic management (ATM) field. For example, AMAN (arrival manager) and DMAN (departure manager) are two commonly used DSTs that provide optimized flight sequences to approach controllers [2]. As a human-center complex system, ATCOs still play a vital role, even though automation could change their role from managing air traffic to monitoring and supervising system operations. ...

Modelling and evaluation of automated arrival management considering air traffic demands