Taylor Tyger’s research while affiliated with Aalto University and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (1)


Figure 1.  The process of integrating the PPGIS tool into the master plan process of Helsinki. 
Figure 2.  PPGIS mapping pages of the survey for Helsinki 2050 City plan explored various themes for future development of the city. 
Figure 3.  To help disseminating the results of the PPGIS survey, we developed an online analysis tool for urban planners and a visualization tool that was accessible for the general public. 
Figure 4.  The respondent demographics compared to the population of Helsinki. 
Figure 5.  Respondents found nearly 9,000 places for new residential buildings. 

+3

Let the Citizens Map—Public Participation GIS as a Planning Support System in the Helsinki Master Plan Process
  • Article
  • Full-text available

December 2015

·

3,827 Reads

·

238 Citations

Planning Practice and Research

·

·

·

Taylor Tyger

Current public participation methods are laborious, reach few participants and are ineffective at gathering usable information for planning. This situation leads often to mistrust and dissatisfaction in the process and outcome. This article identifies the critical conditions for meaningful use of public participation GIS (PPGIS) tools to support the making of master plan in Helsinki. With PPGIS tools, residents’ insight of their living environment can be reached and utilized along the planning process. The results are divided to conceptual and empirical points. Whereas the conceptual points emphasize better understanding of the locus of the PPGIS tools in planning process, the empirical findings reveal new ways to study how residents’ perceptions align with the plan proposal. Though new tools, data and analysis can support representativeness, independence, early involvement, influence and transparency, planners and residents need more understanding of the benefits of these tools. The study indicates that though planners found the collected data and the analysis valuable, they still lacked the skills and institutional motivation to use the data effectively. The results point out that when PPGIS tools can be integrated to the mainstream planning practices, the tools have the ability to evolve to a more comprehensive participatory planning support system.

Download

Citations (1)


... Studies in urban development have long emphasised the importance of civic participation in ensuring effective governance and sustainable development outcomes (Allmendinger & Haughton, 2019;Bacău et al., 2020;Booher & Innes, 2002;Fung, 2006;Große, 2021;Healey, 1997;Innes & Booher, 2004;Kahila-Tani et al., 2016;Kalandides, 2018;Lane, 2005;Mäkinen, 2021;Sager, 2020;UN-DESA, 2016). As noted by Fung (2006), Sager (2020), and Healey (1997), the engagement of citizens in the planning process enhances the accountability and responsiveness of urban development initiatives. ...

Reference:

Rethinking participation in urban planning: analytical and practical contributions of social network analysis
Let the Citizens Map—Public Participation GIS as a Planning Support System in the Helsinki Master Plan Process

Planning Practice and Research