Tamara Ehresmann’s scientific contributions

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (1)


Index proband with a Parkes Weber syndrome and a postzygotic RASA1 variant. (A) Large capillary stain on the left lower limb with associated segmental overgrowth, especially of the second toe. (B) NGS gene panel analysis and Sanger sequencing detected a RASA1 variant [c.1428dup; p.(Lys477*)] with a variant allele frequency of approx. 20% in two independent blood samples and an additional buccal mucosa sample of the patient. The pathogenic RASA1 variant was not detected in the blood samples of the parents.
Novel postzygotic RASA1 mutation in a patient with Parkes Weber syndrome: A case report and literature review
  • Article
  • Full-text available

November 2024

·

21 Reads

·

·

Tamara Ehresmann

·

[...]

·

Key Clinical Message Not only germline but also postzygotic mutations in the RASA1 or EPHB4 genes can lead to capillary malformation‐arteriovenous malformation (CM‐AVM) syndrome. As it is not always possible to clinically distinguish between constitutional variants and postzygotic mosaicism, a sufficiently high sequencing depth must be used in genetic diagnostics to detect both. Abstract Capillary malformation‐arteriovenous malformation (CM‐AVM) syndrome, with or without Parkes Weber syndrome, is a rare autosomal dominant disease caused by pathogenic RASA1 or EPHB4 variants. Up to 80% of CM‐AVM cases have an affected parent. Gene panel sequencing was performed for a 4‐year‐old girl with multiple CMs, two capillary stains on the left leg, and associated overgrowth of the second toe. We also reviewed published cases with mosaic RASA1 and EPHB4 mutations. A mosaic RASA1 loss‐of‐function mutation was detected with a variant allele frequency (VAF) of 20% in the blood and oral epithelial cells of the index patient. The literature review illustrates that the severity of the clinical phenotype does not correlate with the VAF. We also identified a germline nonsense variant in the patient's TEK gene. However, inactivating TEK variants do not cause a vascular phenotype but can confer an increased risk for primary congenital glaucoma with variable expressivity. The case presented here illustrates that the choice of the sequencing depth of a diagnostic next‐generation sequencing test for CM‐AVM patients should always take mosaicism into account and that a good knowledge of the sequenced genes and associated disease mechanisms is necessary for adequate genetic counseling.

Download