T R Oxland’s research while affiliated with University of British Columbia and other places

The application of mechanical principles to problems of the spine dates to antiquity. Significant developments related to spinal anatomy and biomechanical behaviour made by Renaissance and post-Renaissance scholars through the end of the 19th century laid a strong foundation for the developments since that time. The objective of this article is to provide a historical overview of spine biomechanics with a focus on the developments in the 20th century. The topics of spine loading, spinal posture and stability, spinal kinematics, spinal injury, and surgical strategies were reviewed.

Understanding proximal femur fracture may yield new targets for fracture prevention screening and treatment. The goal of this study was to characterize force–displacement and failure behaviours in the proximal femur between displacement control and impact loading fall simulations. Twenty-one human proximal femurs were tested in two ways, first to a sub-failure load at a constant displacement rate, then to fracture in an impact fall simulator. Comparisons of sub-failure energy and stiffness were made between the tests at the same compressive force. Additionally, the impact failure tests were compared with previous, constant displacement rate failure tests (at 2 and 100 mm/s) in terms of energy, yield force, and stiffness. Loading and displacement rates were characterized and related to specimen stiffness in the impact tests. No differences were observed between the sub-failure constant displacement and impact tests in the aforementioned metrics. Comparisons between failure tests showed that the impact group had the lowest absorbed energy, 24% lower maximum force and 160% higher stiffness than the 100 mm/s group ( for all), but suffered from low statistical power to differentiate the donor age and specimen BMD. Loading and displacement rates for the specimens tested using impact varied during each test and between specimens and did not show appreciable viscoelasticity. These results indicate that constant displacement rate testing may help understand sub-failure mechanical behaviour, but may not elucidate failure behaviours. The differences between the impact and constant displacement rate fall simulations have important ramifications for interpreting the results of previous experiments.

Purpose Determine the effects of dynamic injurious axial compression applied at various lateral eccentricities (lateral distance to the centre of the spine) on mechanical flexibilities and structural injury patterns of the cervical spine. Methods 13 three-vertebra human cadaver cervical spine specimens (6 C3–5, 3 C4–6, 2 C5–7, 2 C6–T1) were subjected to pure moment flexibility tests (±1.5 Nm) before and after impact trauma was applied in two groups: low and high lateral eccentricity (1 and 150 % of the lateral diameter of the vertebral body, respectively). Relative range of motion (ROM) and relative neutral zone (NZ) were calculated as the ratio of post and pre-trauma values. Injuries were diagnosed by a spine surgeon and scored. Classification functions were developed using discriminant analysis. Results Low and high eccentric loading resulted in primarily bony fractures and soft tissue injuries, respectively. Axial impacts with high lateral eccentricities resulted in greater spinal motion in lateral bending [median relative ROM 3.5 (interquartile range, IQR 2.3) vs. 1.4 (IQR 0.5) and median relative NZ 4.7 (IQR 3.7) vs. 2.3 (IQR 1.1)] and in axial rotation [median relative ROM 5.3 (IQR 13.7) vs. 1.3 (IQR 0.5), p

Although acoustic emission (AE) signals from isolated spinal ligament failures have lower amplitudes and frequencies than those from vertebral body fractures, it is not known if AE signals could be used to differentiate between injured structures in spine segment testing. The objectives of this study were to evaluate differences in AE signal amplitudes and frequencies resulting from injuries of various tissue types, tested as part of a spine segment, during dynamic loading. Three-vertebra specimens from the human cadaver cervical spine were tested in dynamic eccentric axial compression with lateral eccentricities. Specimens were tested with low (n=6) and high (n=5) initial eccentricities of 5 and 150% of the lateral diameter of the vertebral body, respectively. AE signals were recorded using two sensors. The time of injury initiation was identified for seven vertebral body and/or endplate fractures and five intertransverse and/or facet capsule ruptures. Hard tissue injuries resulted in higher peak amplitude AE signals than soft tissue injuries. Characteristic frequencies of AE signals from the sensor on the concave side of the lateral bend from failures of hard tissues were greater than those from failure of soft tissues. These findings suggest that AE signals can assist in delineating injured structures of the spine.

Current neck injury criteria do not include limits for lateral bending combined with axial compression and this has been observed as a clinically relevant mechanism, particularly for rollover motor vehicle crashes. The primary objectives of this study were to evaluate the effects of lateral eccentricity (the perpendicular distance from the axial force to the centre of the spine) on peak loads, kinematics, and spinal canal occlusions of subaxial cervical spine specimens tested in dynamic axial compression (0.5m/s). Twelve 3-vertebra human cadaver cervical spine specimens were tested in two groups: low and high eccentricity with initial eccentricities of 1 and 150% of the lateral diameter of the vertebral body. Six-axis loads inferior to the specimen, kinematics of the superior-most vertebra, and spinal canal occlusions were measured. High speed video was collected and acoustic emission (AE) sensors were used to define the time of injury. The effects of eccentricity on peak loads, kinematics, and canal occlusions were evaluated using unpaired Student t-tests. The high eccentricity group had lower peak axial forces (1544±629 vs. 4296±1693N), inferior displacements (0.2±1.0 vs. 6.6±2.0mm), and canal occlusions (27±5 vs. 53±15%) and higher peak ipsilateral bending moments (53±17 vs. 3±18Nm), ipsilateral bending rotations (22±3 vs. 1±2°), and ipsilateral displacements (4.5±1.4 vs. -1.0±1.3mm, p<0.05 for all comparisons). These results provide new insights to develop prevention, recognition, and treatment strategies for compressive cervical spine injuries with lateral eccentricities.

Acoustic emission (AE) sensors are a reliable tool in detecting fracture; however they have not been used to differentiate between compressive osseous and tensile ligamentous failures in the spine. This study evaluated the effectiveness of AE data in detecting the time of injury of ligamentum flavum (LF) and vertebral body (VB) specimens tested in tension and compression, respectively, and in differentiating between these failures. AE signals were collected while LF (n=7) and VB (n=7) specimens from human cadavers were tested in tension and compression (0.4m/s), respectively. Times of injury (time of peak AE amplitude) were compared to those using traditional methods (VB: time of peak force, LF: visual evidence in high speed video). Peak AE signal amplitudes and frequencies (using Fourier and wavelet transformations) for the LF and VB specimens were compared. In each group, six specimens failed (VB, fracture; LF, periosteal stripping or attenuation) and one did not. Time of injury using AE signals for VB and LF specimens produced average absolute differences to traditional methods of 0.7 (SD=0.2) ms and 2.4 (SD=1.5) ms (representing 14% and 20% of the average loading time), respectively. AE signals from VB fractures had higher amplitudes and frequencies than those from LF failures (average peak amplitude 87.7 (SD=6.9) dB vs. 71.8 (SD=9.8)dB for the inferior sensor, p<0.05; median characteristic frequency from the inferior sensor 97 (interquartile range, IQR, 41) kHz vs. 31 (IQR 2) kHz, p<0.05). These findings demonstrate that AE signals could be used to delineate complex failures of the spine.

Digitizing bony landmarks is a common technique used to measure scapular position, but it has not been validated against a gold standard. The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of this technique for four physiological arm movements using optoelectronic markers mounted on scapular bone pins as a gold standard. Eight subjects had bone pins inserted into their lateral scapular spine. Three points were digitized on the scapula with an optoelectronic probe: the medial root of the scapular spine, the posterolateral corner of the acromion, and the inferior angle of the scapula. The four active movements tested in this study were glenohumeral abduction, glenohumeral horizontal adduction, hand behind back, and forward reaching. The three bony landmarks were digitized six times in three different positions for each movement. Data from one subject were rejected secondary to pin loosening. The overall position-specific r.m.s. errors ranged from 2.0 degrees to 12.5 degrees. The full abduction position had considerably higher r.m.s. errors than the other positions (posterior tipping, 12.5 degrees; upward rotation, 7.3 degrees; internal rotation, 12.0 degrees). It appears that the digitization of bony landmarks may be a valid method for measuring changes in scapular attitude with the following caveats: the full abduction position has a high r.m.s. error, and small scapular motions have high percentage errors.

Our primary objective was to validate the Bone Strength Index for compression (BSIC) by determining the amount of variance in failure load and stiffness that was explained by BSIC and bone properties at two distal sites in human cadaveric tibiae when tested in axial compression. Our secondary objective was to assess the variance in failure moment and flexural rigidity that was explained by bone properties, geometry and strength indices in the tibial diaphysis when tested in 4-point bending. Twenty cadaver tibiae pairs from 5 female and 5 male donors (mean age 74 yrs, SD 6 yrs) were measured at the distal epiphysis (4 and 10% sites of the tibial length from the distal end) and diaphysis (50 and 66% sites) by peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography (pQCT; XCT 2000, Stratec). After imaging, we conducted axial compression tests on the distal tibia and 4-point bending tests on the diaphysis. Total bone mineral content and BSIC (product of total area and squared density of the cross-section) at the 4% site predicted 75% and 85% of the variance in the failure load and 52% and 57% in stiffness, respectively. At the diaphyseal sites 80% or more of the variance in failure moment and/or flexural rigidity was predicted by total and cortical area and content, geometry and strength indices corresponding to the axes of bending.

Experimental measurement of the load-bearing patterns of the facet joints in the lumbar spine remains a challenge, thereby limiting the assessment of facet joint function under various surgical conditions and the validation of computational models. The extra-articular strain (EAS) technique, a non-invasive measurement of the contact load, has been used for unilateral facet joints but does not incorporate strain coupling, i.e. ipsilateral EASs due to forces on the contralateral facet joint. The objectives of the present study were to establish a bilateral model for facet contact force measurement using the EAS technique and to determine its effectiveness in measuring these facet joint contact forces during three-dimensional flexibility tests in the lumbar spine. Specific goals were to assess the accuracy and repeatability of the technique and to assess the effect of soft-tissue artefacts. In the accuracy and repeatability tests, ten uniaxial strain gauges were bonded to the external surface of the inferior facets of L3 of ten fresh lumbar spine specimens. Two pressure-sensitive sensors (Tekscan) were inserted into the joints after the capsules were cut. Facet contact forces were measured with the EAS and Tekscan techniques for each specimen in flexion, extension, axial rotation, and lateral bending under a ±7.5 N m pure moment. Four of the ten specimens were tested five times in axial rotation and extension for repeatability. These same specimens were disarticulated and known forces were applied across the facet joint using a manual probe (direct accuracy) and a materials-testing system (disarticulated accuracy). In soft-tissue artefact tests, a separate set of six lumbar spine specimens was used to document the virtual facet joint contact forces during a flexibility test following removal of the superior facet processes. Linear strain coupling was observed in all specimens. The average peak facet joint contact forces during flexibility testing was greatest in axial rotation (71±25 N), followed by extension (27±35 N) and lateral bending (25±28 N), and they were most repeatable in axial rotation (coefficient of variation, 5 per cent). The EAS accuracy was about 20 per cent in the direct accuracy assessment and about 30 per cent in the disarticulated accuracy test. The latter was very similar to the Tekscan accuracy in the same test. Virtual facet loads (r.m.s.) were small in axial rotation (12 N) and lateral bending (20 N), but relatively large in flexion (34 N) and extension (35 N). The results suggested that the bilateral EAS model could be used to determine the facet joint contact forces in axial rotation but may result in considerable error in flexion, extension, and lateral bending.

This study explored the relationship between the initial stability of the femoral component and penetration of cement into the graft bed following impaction allografting. Impaction allografting was carried out in human cadaveric femurs. In one group the cement was pressurised conventionally but in the other it was not pressurised. Migration and micromotion of the implant were measured under simulated walking loads. The specimens were then cross-sectioned and penetration of the cement measured. Around the distal half of the implant we found approximately 70% and 40% of contact of the cement with the endosteum in the pressure and no-pressure groups, respectively. The distal migration/micromotion, and valgus/varus migration were significantly higher in the no-pressure group than in that subjected to pressure. These motion components correlated negatively with the mean area of cement and its contact with the endosteum. The presence of cement at the endosteum appears to play an important role in the initial stability of the implant following impaction allografting.