Susana T. Valente’s research while affiliated with The Scripps Research Institute and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (6)


FUBP3 enhances HIV-1 transcriptional activity and regulates immune response pathways in T cells
  • Article

June 2025

·

2 Reads

·

1 Citation

Molecular Therapy — Nucleic Acids

Quentin M.R. Gibaut

·

·

Anqi Cheng

·

[...]

·

Susana T. Valente

Simplified Version of Factors Recruited to the Transcriptionally Active and Latent HIV Promoter. Both 1A and 1B are adapted from reviews by Gibaut and Mori published in Current Opinion in HIV and AIDS in 2023 and Viruses in 2020 respectively. A Active Promoter: Upon activation, transcriptional repressors are replaced by transcriptional activators, marking the beginning of the transcription process. The initial step involves the assembly of the PIC at the promoter region. This assembly is orchestrated by the synchronized binding of general transcription factors (GTFs), including the TATA-binding protein (TBP) to the TATA box within TFIID, TFIIA, TFIIB, and TFIIF, along with the mediator complex. Additional activator TFs, such as NF-κB and Sp1, further contribute to the assembly by binding to the long terminal repeat (LTR). While PIC formation initially proceeds independently of Tat, the presence of Tat significantly enhances this process. Tat recruits TBP to the HIV-1 LTR, bypassing the requirement for other TFIID components like TAFs, through its interaction with P-TEFb. The final stages of PIC assembly involve the recruitment of RNAPII and the remaining GTFs, TFIIE and TFIIH. Under basal condition, BRD4, which belongs to the bromodomain-containing protein family (BRD), competes with the HIV Tat protein for P-TEFb binding. This competitive interaction inhibits efficient Tat-dependent transcription elongation. When Tat protein reaches a sufficient concentration, it recruits P-TEFb (CDK9 and Cyclin T1) to the transactivation response element (TAR) RNA. CDK9 acts as an early elongation kinase, overcoming promoter proximal pausing by phosphorylating Ser2 on the RNAPII CTD, as well as two elongation factors associated with paused RNAPII: NELF and DSIF. Phosphorylation of DSIF by the CDK9 subunit of P-TEFb transforms it into a positive elongation factor that accompanies RNAPII through the gene body. Conversely, phosphorylation of NELF by P-TEFb leads to its dissociation from the transcription complex, allowing RNAPII to efficiently elongate. Tat also recruits the PBAF complex, which repositions Nuc-1 further downstream of the TSS, further enhancing transcriptional elongation. Histone acetyltransferases (HATs) are subsequently recruited to acetylate histones, relaxing the chromatin structure and rendering it more accessible for the transcriptional machinery. B Latent Promoter: During latency, the positive transcription elongation factor b (P-TEFb), composed of CDK9 and CycT1, is sequestered in an inactive complex with the 7SK small nuclear RNA (7SK snRNA), HEXIM, MEPCE and LARP7. Several transcription factors (TFs) such as YY1 directly bind to DNA, facilitating the recruitment of histone deacetylases (HDACs) and histone methyltransferases (HMTs). HDACs remove acetyl groups from histones, while HMTs add methyl groups to histones. Additionally, the BAF complex, a member of the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling family, positions Nuc-1 downstream of the transcription start site (TSS), in an unfavorable position for transcriptional elongation. DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs) are also thought to hypermethylate the CpG islands near the TSS, leading to the recruitment of HDACs through interacting with Methyl-CpG binding domain protein 2 (MBD2), contributing to latency.
Nucleosomal Structure of the HIV-1 Promoter. A The integrated HIV-1 viral genome is 9719 nucleotides long. The genes encoded by the viral genome are depicted relative to their positions within the genome. Each long terminal repeat (LTR) consists of three regions: U3, R, and U5. B An expanded view of the 5' LTR highlights four key regions: the modulatory region, the enhancer (E) region, the core promoter, and the transactivation response (TAR) region. C The positioning of nucleosomes relative to the HIV transcription start site (TSS) is illustrated. The TSS is indicated by a black arrow, and the nucleosomes (Nuc-0, Nuc-1, and Nuc-2) are represented as mint-colored ovals. The regions between the nucleosomes are labeled as DNase hypersensitivity sites (DHS-1 and DHS-2), signifying areas of increased chromatin accessibility. B and C Numbers are relative to the TSS.
Chromatin Remodeler Families and Their Associated Core ATPase Subunits. This figure presents the four major chromatin remodeler families, highlighting their members and associated core ATPase subunits. The central, brightly colored subunit in each illustration represents the core ATPase, while the size of each shape depicts the relative size of each subunit within the complex. A BAF and PBAF complexes and their relative subunits. B ISWI family members and their subunits. The preferred ATPase subunits of the RSF and CERF complexes are underlined. C CHD family members and their subunits. D INO80 family members and their subunits.
Examples of Compounds Targeting the SWI/SNF Family of Chromatin Remodelers. A Chemical structure of JQ1. B Chemical structure of BRD-K98645985. C Chemical structure of ZL0580.
Examples of Compounds Inhibiting the Tat-TAR Interaction. A Chemical structure of didehydro-cortistatin A (dCA). B Chemical structure of T0516-4834, T6780107, and T5628834 (from left to right). C Chemical structure of 460-G06.
Human chromatin remodelers regulating HIV-1 transcription: a target for small molecule inhibitors
  • Literature Review
  • Full-text available

April 2025

·

13 Reads

Epigenetics & Chromatin

HIV-1 can establish a lifelong infection by incorporating its proviral DNA into the host genome. Once integrated, the virus can either remain dormant or start active transcription, a process governed by the HIV Tat protein, host transcription factors and the chromatin landscape at the integration site. Histone-modifying enzymes and chromatin-remodeling enzymes play crucial roles in regulating this chromatin environment. Chromatin remodelers, a group of ATP-dependent proteins, collaborate with host proteins and histone-modifying enzymes to restructure nucleosomes, facilitating DNA repair, replication, and transcription. Recent studies have highlighted the importance of chromatin remodelers in HIV-1 latency, spurring research focused on developing small molecule modulators that can either reactivate the virus for eradication approaches or induce long-term latency to prevent future reactivation. Research efforts have primarily centered on the SWI/SNF family, though much remains to be uncovered regarding other chromatin remodeling families. This review delves into the general functions and roles of each chromatin remodeling family in the context of HIV and discusses recent advances in small molecule development targeting chromatin remodelers and the HIV Tat protein, aiming to improve therapeutic approaches against HIV.

Download

The Far Upstream Element Binding Protein 3 enhances HIV-1 transcriptional activity and regulates immune response pathways in T cells

March 2025

·

19 Reads

·

1 Citation

Molecular Therapy — Nucleic Acids

Far-upstream element-binding protein 3 (FUBP3) was identified at actively transcribing HIV promoters through chromatin affinity purification and mass spectrometry. Known for regulating cellular processes such as transcription and translation by binding to DNAs and RNAs, FUBP3’s role in HIV transcriptional regulation was previously unrecognized. This study reveals that FUBP3 enhances HIV-1 transcriptional activation by interacting with Tat and trans-activation response (TAR)-RNA, critical for boosting viral transcription through recruitment of activating factors that promote RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) elongation. Transcriptomic analysis, chromatin immunoprecipitation, and biochemical assays demonstrated that FUBP3 associates with and stabilizes TAR-RNA, in a Tat-dependent manner, and enhances Tat steady-state levels via interaction with Tat’s basic domain. Suppressing FUBP3 decreased HIV-1 transcription and altered expression of host genes linked to T cell activation and inflammation, underscoring its broad regulatory impact. Additionally, FUBP3 was enriched at active promoters, confirming its role in transcriptional regulation at specific genomic locations. These findings highlight FUBP3’s critical role in the HIV-1 life cycle and suggest its potential as a therapeutic target in HIV-1 infection. Additionally, this study expands our understanding of FUBP3’s functions in oncogenic and inflammatory pathways.




Regulation of HIV transcription. (A) Tat-mediated HIV-1 transcription. The transition from transcriptional initiation to elongation implies the replacement of transcriptional repressors by activators, including NF-κB, SP-1, and histone acetyltransferases (HATs), such as p300/CREB-binding protein (CBP). HATs promote open chromatin and recruitment of polybromo-associated factor (PBAF). PBAF repositions Nuc-1 further downstream of the transcription start site (TSS), enabling efficient transcriptional elongation. Furthermore, the secondary structure of the nascent TAR RNA is also accessible for the biding of Tat protein and further transcription activation. P-TEFb-associated CDK9 phosphorylates the CTD of RNAPII at serine 2, enabling the production of full-length HIV-1 transcripts, which are spliced to produced Tat and an active transcription elongation is established. A Tat-dependent positive feedback loop is generated by increasing HIV-1 transcription and, consequently, exponential replication. (B) Establishment of HIV-1 latency. Several proteins are implicated in the establishment of HIV-1 latency. These include transcription factors such as YY-1 and CBF, enabling the recruitment of histone deacetylases (HDACs). HDACs remove acetyl groups from core histones, namely, at Nuc-1, restricting the accessibility of positive transcription factors to the promoter, promoting viral latency. Histone methyltransferases (HMTs) involved in the establishment of HIV-1 latency include SUV39H1 and G9a, which are involved in Lys9 trimethylation of histone H3 (H3K9me3) and H3K9 dimethylation (H3K9me2), respectively. Two factors, DSIF and NELF, co-operate to pause RNAPII. Repressive factors such as BAF favor HIV-1 latency by positioning Nuc-1 in an energetically unfavorable position downstream of the TSS. Finally, P-TEFb is inactive through its association with the 7SK snRNP, preventing the transition from transcriptional initiation to elongation.
Shock-and-kill approach to eradicate HIV-1 from latently infected cells. During HIV-1 infection, the majority of CD4⁺ T cells are eliminated through cytopathic effects; the few surviving cells revert to a resting memory state harboring latent proviruses. The shock-and-kill approach uses latency reversal agents (LRA) to increase HIV-1 transcription/replication and virions production. This reactivation leads to the elimination of infected cells by cell cytolysis or immune clearance, and simultaneously the remaining viruses are blocked from novel infections by ART.
Block-and-lock approach as a functional cure for HIV-1 infection. The block-and-lock approach entails the long-term durable silencing of viral gene expression. Supplementation of ART with a latency promoting agent (LPA), such as the Tat inhibitor didehydro-Cortistatin A (dCA), could suppress ongoing transcriptional events, induce epigenetic silencing over time and promote a state of “deep latency”, blocking or limiting viral rebound upon treatment interruption.
RNA-based strategies against HIV infection. RNA-based strategies include the use of miRNAs, siRNAs, RNA aptamers, and mRNAs. These RNAs can be synthesized to specifically bind to CCR5, the major co-receptor for HIV entry, or bind to crucial regions into HIV proviral genome. siRNAs assemble with cellular host proteins to form an RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC). Only one strand (guide) is maintained and produces an active RISC that triggers the targeted mRNA degradation, culminating in translational silencing.
CRISPR/Cas system to generate CCR5-resistant stem cells. Hematopoietic stem cells are collected from bone marrow of infected individuals. These cells are expanded ex vivo upon genome editing by the CRISPR/Cas system targeting the CCR5 co-receptor. Subsequently, the CCR5-modified stem cells are infused back to the same individual.
Block-and-Lock: New Horizons for a Cure for HIV-1

December 2020

·

430 Reads

·

71 Citations

HIV-1/AIDS remains a global public health problem. The world health organization (WHO) reported at the end of 2019 that 38 million people were living with HIV-1 worldwide, of which only 67% were accessing antiretroviral therapy (ART). Despite great success in the clinical management of HIV-1 infection, ART does not eliminate the virus from the host genome. Instead, HIV-1 remains latent as a viral reservoir in any tissue containing resting memory CD4+ T cells. The elimination of these residual proviruses that can reseed full-blown infection upon treatment interruption remains the major barrier towards curing HIV-1. Novel approaches have recently been developed to excise or disrupt the virus from the host cells (e.g., gene editing with the CRISPR-Cas system) to permanently shut off transcription of the virus (block-and-lock and RNA interference strategies), or to reactivate the virus from cell reservoirs so that it can be eliminated by the immune system or cytopathic effects (shock-and-kill strategy). Here, we will review each of these approaches, with the major focus placed on the block-and-lock strategy.

Citations (1)


... The reason for the lack of correlation is likely due to the multiple mechanisms that operate in vivo the maintain HIV latency which are not fully replicated in vitro. Studies show cells carrying HIV-1 proviruses can be located in a broad range of tissue reservoirs vary widely in their susceptibility to LRAs [56,59]. Susceptibility to LRAs in vivo is likely to be influenced by the impact of genetic and epigenic factors and interaction with viral components; there are potentially multiple possible integration sites for the HIV provirus DNA which have be observed in vivo which are not recapitulated in vitro [56]. ...

Reference:

The Possibilities of Finding a Cure for HIV: A Literature Review
Block-and-Lock: New Horizons for a Cure for HIV-1