Susan Breen’s research while affiliated with The University of Warwick and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (4)


Rapid local and systemic jasmonate signalling drives initiation and establishment of plant systemic immunity
  • Preprint

May 2023

·

60 Reads

Trupti Gaikwad

·

Susan Breen

·

·

[...]

·

Successful recognition of pathogen effectors by plant disease resistance proteins (effector triggered immunity, ETI) contains the invading pathogen through a localized hypersensitive response (HR). In addition, ETI activates long-range signalling cascades that establish broad spectrum systemic acquired resistance (SAR). Using a novel and sensitive reporter we have been able to image the spatio- temporal dynamics of SAR. We demonstrate that local ETI triggered SAR signal generation, followed by rapid propagation and establishment in systemic responding leaves, is dependent on both jasmonate biosynthesis and perception. Further, ETI initiates calcium- and jasmonate-dependent systemic surface electrical potentials, reminiscent of those activated by herbivory but with slower propagation kinetics. Thus, jasmonate signalling is crucial to the initiation and establishment of systemic defence responses against a diverse range of phytopathogens.


The chloroplast plays a central role in facilitating MAMP-Triggered Immunity, pathogen suppression of immunity and crosstalk with abiotic stress
  • Article
  • Full-text available

July 2022

·

91 Reads

·

8 Citations

Plant Cell and Environment

Microbe associated molecular pattern (MAMP) triggered immunity research has traditionally centred around signal transduction pathways originating from activated membrane localised pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), culminating in nuclear transcription and post translational modifications. More recently, chloroplasts have emerged as key immune signalling hubs, playing a central role in integrating environmental signals. Notably, MAMP recognition induces chloroplastic ROS (cROS) which is suppressed by pathogen effectors, which also modify the balance of chloroplast‐synthesised precursors of the defence hormones, jasmonic acid (JA), salicylic acid (SA) and abscisic acid (ABA). This study focuses on how well characterised PRRs and co‐receptors modulate chloroplast physiology, examining whether diverse signalling pathways converge to similarly modulate chloroplast function. Pre‐treatment of receptor mutant plants with MAMP and D(Damage)AMP peptides usually protect against effector modulation of chlorophyll fluorescence and prevent Pseudomonas syringae effector mediated quenching of cROS and suppression of maximum dark‐adapted quantum efficiency (Fv/Fm). The MAMP‐triggered immunity (MTI) co‐receptor double mutant, bak1‐5/bkk1‐1, exhibits a remarkable decrease in Fv/Fm compared to control plants during infection, underlining the importance of MTI mediated signalling in chloroplast immunity. Further probing the role of the chloroplast in immunity we unexpectedly found that even moderate changes in light intensity can uncouple plant immune signalling. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Download

The chloroplast plays a central role in facilitating MAMP-Triggered Immunity, pathogen suppression of immunity and crosstalk with abiotic stress.

June 2022

·

54 Reads

Microbe associated molecular pattern (MAMP) triggered immunity research has traditionally centred around signal transduction pathways originating from activated membrane localised pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), culminating in nuclear transcription and post translational modifications. More recently, chloroplasts have emerged as key immune signalling hubs. Chloroplasts play a central role in integrating environmental signals. Notably MAMP recognition induces chloroplastic ROS (cROS) which is suppressed by pathogens effectors, which also modify the balance of defence hormone precursors, jasmonic acid (JA), salicylic acid (SA) and abscisic acid (ABA), whose precursors are chloroplast synthesised. This study focuses on how well characterised PRRs and co-receptors modulate chloroplast physiology, examining whether diverse signalling pathways converge to similarly modulate chloroplast function. Pre-treatment of receptor mutant plants with MAMP and D(Damage)AMP peptides usually protect against effector modulation of chlorophyll fluorescence and prevent Pseudomonas syringae effector mediated quenching of cROS and suppression of F/F . The MAMP-triggered immunity (MTI) co-receptor double mutant, bak1-5/bkk1-1, exhibits a remarkable decrease in F/F compared to control plants during infection, underlining the importance of MTI mediated signalling in chloroplast immunity. Further probing the role of the chloroplast in immunity we unexpectedly found that high light uncouples plant immune signalling.


Photosystem II quantum efficiency (Fv/Fm) captures early chloroplast changes in response to virulent and avirulent pathogens. (a,b) Challenge with the virulent apoplastic bacterial phytopathogen P. syringae pv. tomato DC3000 (Pst) but not mock (MgCl2) or the disarmed hrpA mutant results in reduced Fv/Fm 7–8 hpi (h post‐infection) as illustrated visually (a) or quantitatively during disease establishment (b). (c) Pst multiplication significantly increase above initial inoculation levels at 8 h post‐infiltration, coincident with reduction in Fv/Fm. Error bars, ± SD. (d) Spray infection with spores of the virulent rice pathogen Magnaporthe oryzae Guy11 similarly induces localized decreases in Fv/Fm. (e) Challenge with the vascular pathogen Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris (Xcc) or P. syringae pv. maculicola suppresses Fv/Fm during infection, the extent of which is directly correlated with virulence of the strains. Pretreatment with ABA, which is rapidly induced de novo following virulent bacterial infections, dramatically enhances suppression of Fv/Fm in both Xcc and Pst. (f) ETI induced either by RPM1 or RPS4 following challenge with Pst carrying the respective avirulence genes, AvrRpm1 or AvrRps4, causes a rapid suppression of Fv/Fm, the timing of which is unique to the specific R protein and correlates with speed of HR development. Kindly provided by: (a–c, f) M. Grant & S. Breen; (d) G. Littlejohn; (e) de Torres et al. (2015: Fig. S4).
An outline of the photosynthetic electron transport system showing the main sources of reactive oxygen species (ROS; singlet oxygen (¹O2), superoxide (O2⁻) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2)) at photosystems I and II. Proteins that are validated effector targets are shown in red. APX, ascorbate peroxidase; 2‐Cys Prx, 2‐cysteine peroxiredoxin; Fd, ferredoxin; FNR, ferredoxin‐NADPH reductase; GPX, glutathione peroxide‐like; NTRC, NADPH‐dependent thioredoxin reductase; PQ, plastoquinone; PC, plastocyanin; SOD, superoxide dismutase; Trx, thioredoxin.
Convergent targeting of Thylakoid formation 1 (Thf1), a negative regulator of cell death, by diverse pathogens. Thf1 plays an important role in photosystem II (PSII) – light harvesting complex II dynamics and is targeted by necrotrophs, biotrophs and viruses. (a) The effector protein ToxA found in a variety of necrotrophic wheat fungal pathogens, Parastagonospora nodorum (Pn), Pyrenophora tritici‐repentis (Ptr) and Bipolaris sorokiniana (Bs), targets the wheat Thf1 orthologue, ToxA Binding Protein 1 (ToxABP), inducing necrosis via ROS accumulation through reduction in PSI and PSII protein complex abundance. The wheat sensitivity protein, Tsn1, is required for ToxA‐dependent necrosis and may monitor binding of ToxA to ToxABP1. (b) The hemibiotrophic bacterium Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato (Pst) delivers effectors (yellow circles) which appear to disrupt Thf1 function, again leading to enhanced lesion formation, although it remains to be determined whether this is by direct or indirect interaction. (c) TheTobamovirus (TBV) N′ virus resistance protein, belongs to the conserved Solanaceae I2 class of CC‐NBS‐LRR resistance protein.that also confersresistance to Phytophthora and Fusarium sp.TBV's CC domain physically targets and destabilizes TBV‐coat protein in a light‐dependent manner to enhance resistance. Based on analogy to the cyanobacterium Synechocystis Thf1 orthologue, Psb29, Thf1 destabilization affects accumulation of the FtsH ATP‐dependent zinc metalloproteases, FTSH2 and FTSH5 (also known as VAR2 and VAR1 respectively), which are involved in the selective degradation of PSII subunits, such as D1 during PS repair. This would lead to PSII disassembly and increased ROS production.
Modulation of calcium and reactive oxygen species (ROS) during suppression of PAMP‐triggered immunity (PTI). (a) PTI initiates stromal Ca²⁺ spikes via mitogen‐activated protein kinase (MAPK) activation of the chloroplast‐localized CAS (calcium sensing protein), and these changes in [Ca²⁺]cp are necessary for callose deposition and stomatal closure. cas mutants are compromised in resistance to both virulent and avirulent Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 (Pst). (b) The integrin‐like effector SsITL (blue) from the soil fungal pathogen Sclerotinia sclerotiorum directly targets CAS to suppress immunity. Virulent Pst attenuates cROS by rapid induction of de novo ABA synthesis. Pst effector delivery rapidly induces expression of NCED3 and AAO3, encoding key enzymes in ABA biosynthesis while concomitantly suppressing expression of the PP2Cs, encoding negative regulators of ABA signalling. ABA application suppresses PTI‐induced chloroplastic ROS generation and enhances effector suppression of Fv/Fm. RipAL and RipAD, Ralstonia solanacearum effectors, also target the chloroplast and suppress cROS, although the mechanism remains to be determined. CAS, Ca²⁺‐sensing protein; NCED, 9‐cis‐epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase; AAO3, abscisic aldehyde oxidase 3; PP2C, protein phosphatase 2C; Rip, Ralstonia‐injected protein; PQ, plastocyanin; SsITL, Sclerotinia sclerotiorum integrin‐like protein; PS, photosystem; PQ, plastocyanin (see Fig. 2 for more details).
Physical responses of chloroplasts to pathogen infection. Stromule formation is common to both ETI and PTI, possibly providing a conduit of physical retrograde communication. (a) Confocal micrographs of tobacco N protein TMV p50‐mediated ETI with chloroplasts visualized in N‐containing NRIP1‐Cerulean plants. Upper left: stromules wrapped around nuclei (maximum‐intensity projection of a z stack). Upper right: direct connection to the nucleus of clusters of stromule tips (single z stack plane). Lower panels: nuclei with a mixture of tip or surrounding stromule connections (transparent projections of z stacks). Bars, 10 μm (from Caplan et al., 2015). (b) Confocal images of reactive oxygen species (visualized by 2′,7′‐dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate [H2DCFDA] staining) in nucleus and chloroplasts of leaf cells challenged with the nonvirulent Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato (Pst) hrpA mutant eliciting PAMP‐triggered immunity (PTI; left panel, bar 20 μm) or virulent Pst capturing effector‐triggered susceptibility (ETS; right panel, bar 10 μm) visualized c. 5 h post‐inoculation. White arrows denote chloroplasts sitting on the nucleus – both organelles show strong H2DCFDA staining. Yellow arrow represents an H2DCFDA F‐stained chloroplast whose stromule is associated with the nucleus. Red fluorescence corresponds to Chl and green channel to the H2DCFDA signal. Bars, 10 μm. (c) Compared with mock challenge (left panel) chloroplast aggregation is seen during Pst ETS in A. thaliana (18 h post‐infection (hpi)). Red fluorescence signal is derived from Chl and green fluorescence from Pst labelled with GFP (adapted from Hutt et al., 2014).

+2

Chloroplast immunity illuminated

December 2020

·

382 Reads

·

101 Citations

The chloroplast has recently emerged as pivotal to co‐ordinating plant defence responses and as a target of plant pathogens. Beyond its central position in oxygenic photosynthesis and primary metabolism – key targets in the complex virulence strategies of diverse pathogens – the chloroplast integrates, decodes and responds to environmental signals. The capacity of chloroplasts to synthesize phytohormones and a diverse range of secondary metabolites, combined with retrograde and reactive oxygen signalling, provides exquisite flexibility to both perceive and respond to biotic stresses. These processes also represent a plethora of opportunities for pathogens to evolve strategies to directly or indirectly target ‘chloroplast immunity’. This review covers the contribution of the chloroplast to pathogen associated molecular pattern and effector triggered immunity as well as systemic acquired immunity. We address phytohormone modulation of immunity and surmise how chloroplast‐derived reactive oxygen species underpin chloroplast immunity through indirect evidence inferred from genetic modification of core chloroplast components and direct pathogen targeting of the chloroplast. We assess the impact of transcriptional reprogramming of nuclear‐encoded chloroplast genes during disease and defence and look at future research challenges.

Citations (2)


... Chloroplasts are also important contributors to disease resistance. They produce a chloroplast-derived reactive oxygen species (cROS) burst and are the sites for production of precursors for the plant hormones salicylic acid (SA) and jasmonic acid ( JA), which regulate immunity 7,8 . In addition, some chloroplast-localized proteins are involved in defence responses 9 . ...

Reference:

Chloroplast elongation factors break the growth–immunity trade-off by simultaneously promoting yield and defence
The chloroplast plays a central role in facilitating MAMP-Triggered Immunity, pathogen suppression of immunity and crosstalk with abiotic stress

Plant Cell and Environment

... Chloroplasts in plant cells have their own DNA containing approximately 120-130 genes that drive photosynthesis in chloroplasts and are translated into proteins [60]. Several key proteins encoded by chloroplasts play vital roles in coordinating effective plant immune responses [61]. Plants have two immune systems: One is membrane-localized pattern recognition receptors that respond to pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) via PAMP-triggered immunity. ...

Chloroplast immunity illuminated